5 results on '"simultaneous resections"'
Search Results
2. Procedure-specific risks of robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.
- Author
-
Radomski, Shannon N., Chen, Sophia Y., Stem, Miloslawa, Done, Joy Zhou, Atallah, Chady, Safar, Bashar, Efron, Jonathan E., and Gabre-Kidan, Alodia
- Abstract
An estimated 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, the most common site being the liver. Although prior studies have reported that a simultaneous approach to resections in these patients can lead to increased rates of complications, emerging literature shows that minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches can mitigate this additional morbidity. This is the first study utilizing a large national database to investigate colorectal and hepatic procedure-specific risks in robotic simultaneous resections for CRC and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP targeted colectomy, proctectomy, and hepatectomy files, 1,721 patients were identified who underwent simultaneous resections of CRC and CRLM from 2016 to 2021. Of these patients, 345 (20%) underwent resections by an MIS approach, defined as either laparoscopic (n = 266, 78%) or robotic (n = 79, 23%). Patients who underwent robotic resections had lower rates of ileus compared to those who had open surgeries. The robotic group had similar rates of 30-day anastomotic leak, bile leak, hepatic failure, and post-operative invasive hepatic procedures compared to both the open and laparoscopic groups. The rate of conversion to open (8% vs. 22%, p = 0.004) and median LOS (5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.022) was significantly lower for robotic compared to laparoscopic group. This study, which is the largest national cohort of simultaneous CRC and CRLM resections, supports the safety and potential benefits of a robotic approach in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Case report: Simultaneous resections of pulmonary segment and an esophageal leiomyoma during spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
- Author
-
Ding Y, Shan L, Li P, Li N, Zhang H, Cong B, Zhang H, Tian Z, Zhao X, and Zhao Y
- Abstract
Spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SV-VATS) has rapidly developed in recent years. The application scope is still being continuously explored. We describe a case in which a 40-year-old woman with mixed ground-glass opacity (GGO) and an esophageal leiomyoma successfully underwent simultaneous segmentectomy and leiomyoma resection through spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The perioperative course was uneventful. Postoperative pathology revealed minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and esophageal leiomyoma., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Ding, Shan, Li, Li, Zhang, Cong, Zhang, Tian, Zhao and Zhao.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Outcomes of simultaneous resections for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.
- Author
-
Slesser, A.A.P., Chand, M., Goldin, R., Brown, G., Tekkis, P.P., and Mudan, S.
- Subjects
COLON cancer treatment ,LIVER metastasis ,ONCOLOGIC surgery ,CANCER relapse ,HEMORRHAGE ,HEALTH outcome assessment - Abstract
Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes associated with simultaneous resections compared to patients undergoing sequential resections for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Method: Consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resections between 2000 and 2012 for synchronous colorectal liver metastases were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Results: Of the 112 hepatic resections that were performed, 36 were simultaneous resections and 76 were sequential resections. There was no difference in disease severity: number of metastases (P 0.228), metastatic size (P 0.58), the primary tumour nodal status (P 0.283), CEA (P 0.387) or the presence of extra-hepatic metastases (P 1.0). Major hepatic resections were performed in 23 (64%) and 60 (79%) of patients in the simultaneous and sequential groups respectively (P 0.089). Intra-operatively no differences were found in blood loss (P 1.0), duration of surgery (P 0.284) or number of adverse events (P 1.0). There were no differences in post-operative complications (P 0.161) or post-operative mortality (P 0.241). The length of hospital stay was 14 (95% CI 12.0โ18.0) and 18.5 (95% CI 16.0โ23.0) days in the simultaneous and sequential groups respectively (P 0.03). The 3-year overall survival was 75% and 64% in the simultaneous and sequential groups respectively (P 0.379). The 3-year hepatic recurrence free survival was 61% and 46% in the simultaneous and sequential groups respectively (P 0.254). Conclusion: Simultaneous resections result in similar short-term and long-term outcomes as patients receiving sequential resections with comparable metastatic disease and are associated with a significant reduction in the length of stay. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A meta-analysis comparing simultaneous versus delayed resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.
- Author
-
Slesser, A. A. P., Simillis, C., Goldin, R., Brown, G., Mudan, S., and Tekkis, P. P.
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer treatment , *METASTASIS , *SURGICAL excision , *LIVER metastasis , *LIVER cancer , *SURGICAL complications - Abstract
Introduction: The traditional surgical management for patients presenting with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLM) has been a delayed resection. However, in some centres, there has been a shift in favour of 'simultaneous' resections. The aim of this study was to use a meta-analytical model to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLM) undergoing simultaneous resections versus delayed resections. Method: Comparative studies published between 1991 and 2010 were included. Evaluated endpoints were intra-operative parameters, post-operative parameters, post-operative adverse events and survival. A random-effects meta-analytical model was used and sensitivity analysis performed to account for bias in patient selection. Results: Twenty-four non-randomized studies were included, reporting on 3159 patients of which 1381 (43.7%) had simultaneous resections and 1778 (56.3%) had delayed resections. The bilobar distribution (P = 0.01), size of liver metastases (P < 0.001) and the proportion of major liver resections (P < 0.001) was found to be higher in the delayed resection group compared to the simultaneous resection group. There was no significant difference in operative blood loss (95% CI, -279.28, 22.53; P = 0.1) or duration of surgery (WMD -23.83, 95% CI, -85.04, 37.38; P = 0.45). Duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced in simultaneous resections by 5.6 days (95% CI: 2.4-8.9 days, P = 0.007) No significant differences in post-operative complications (36% vs 37%, P = 0.27), overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 -1.15, P = 0.96) or disease free survival (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.02, P = 0.08) were found. Sensitivity analysis revealed that these findings were consistent for the duration of hospital stay, post-operative complications, overall survival and disease free survival. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the selection criteria for patients undergoing simultaneous or delayed resections differs resulting in a discrepancy in the metastatic disease severity being compared between the two groups. The comparable intra-operative parameters, post-operative complications and survival found between the two groups suggest that delayed resections may result in better outcomes. Similarly, the reduced length of hospital stay in simultaneous resections may only be as a result of the reduced disease severity in this group. Simultaneous resections can only be recommended in patients with limited hepatic disease until prospective studies comparing similar disease burdens between the two resection groups are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.