Search

Background/Objective: Patients with severe asthma (SA) and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) without microbiological colonization represent a unique and understudied population. Type 2-targeted biologic therapies have emerged as a promising treatment for these patients. However, predictive factors for achieving clinical remission remain unclear. This study aims to identify the predictive factors for achieving clinical remission in patients with severe asthma and non-colonized bronchiectasis undergoing type 2-targeted biologic therapies. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal analysis was conducted on 14 patients with severe asthma and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis without microbiological colonization. Clinical remission was assessed at baseline (T0) and after 12 months (T1) of biologic therapy. Clinical remission was defined according to the Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) criteria, including the absence of oral corticosteroid use, no asthma-related symptoms, stable lung function, and no exacerbations. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of remission. ROC curves were constructed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of lung function parameters, specifically FEV1 and FVC. Results: After 12 months of biologic therapy, 28.6% of patients (n = 4) achieved clinical remission. The mean FEV1 percentage at baseline was significantly higher in the remission group (92.25 ± 15.64%) compared to the non-remission group (65.10 ± 23.36%, p = 0.034). Logistic regression analysis identified baseline FEV1 as a significant predictor of remission (OR = 1.008, p = 0.050). ROC curve analysis revealed that an FEV1 cutoff of 72.5% had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 70% (AUC = 0.900, p = 0.024) for predicting clinical remission. Conclusions: FEV1 is a crucial predictor of clinical remission in patients with severe asthma and non-colonized bronchiectasis treated with type 2-targeted biologic therapies. An FEV1 threshold of 72.5% can guide clinicians in identifying patients most likely to achieve remission. These findings underline the importance of preserving lung function to optimize therapeutic outcomes in this complex population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe asthma is a syndromic label assigned to patients based on clinical parameters, yet there are diverse underlying molecular endotypes in severe asthma pathobiology. Immunophenotyping of asthma biospecimens commonly includes a mixture of granulocytes and lymphocytes. Recently, a subset of patients with severe asthma was defined as non-type 2 with neutrophil-enriched inflammation associated with increased Th17 CD4+ T cells and IL-17 levels. Here, we used an allergen-driven mouse model of increased IL-17 and mixed granulocyte lung inflammation to determine the impact of upstream regulation by an Anticalin protein that specifically binds IL-23. Airway administration of the IL-23-binding Anticalin protein (AcIL-23) decreased lung neutrophils, eosinophils, macrophages, lymphocytes, IL-17+ CD4 T cells, mucous cell metaplasia, and methacholine-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Selective targeting of IL-23 with a monoclonal antibody (IL-23p19; αIL-23) also decreased macrophages, IL-17+ CD4 T cells, and airway hyperresponsiveness. In contrast, a monoclonal antibody against IL-17A (αIL-17A) had no significant effect on airway hyperresponsiveness but did decrease lung neutrophils, macrophages, and IL-17+ CD4 T cells. Targeting the IL-23 pathway did not significantly change IL-5+ or IL-13+ CD4 T cells. Together, these data indicate that airway AcIL-23 mirrored the activity of systemic anti-IL-23 antibody to decrease airway hyperresponsiveness in addition to mixed granulocytic inflammation and that these protective actions were broader than blocking IL-17A or IL-5 alone, which selectively decreased airway neutrophils and eosinophils, respectively. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: This is the first report of an Anticalin protein engineered to neutralize IL-23 (AcIL-23). Airway administration of AcIL-23 in mice regulated allergen-driven airway inflammation, mucous cell metaplasia, and methacholine-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. In mixed granulocytic allergic lung inflammation, immune regulation of IL-23 was broader than neutralization of either IL-17 or IL-5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Calprotectin, a calcium-binding protein, plays a crucial role in inflammation and has been associated with various inflammatory diseases, including asthma. However, its regulation and impact on steroid hyporesponsiveness, especially in severe asthma, remain poorly understood. Methods: This study investigated the regulation of calprotectin proteins (S100A8 and S100A9) by IL-17 and its role in steroid hyporesponsiveness using in vitro and in vivo models. Calprotectin expression was assessed in primary bronchial fibroblasts from healthy controls and severe asthmatic patients, as well as in mouse models of steroid hyporesponsive lung inflammation induced by house dust mite (HDM) allergen and cyclic-di-GMP (cdiGMP) adjuvant. The effects of IL-17A stimulation on calprotectin expression and steroid response markers in bronchial epithelial and fibroblast cells were examined. Additionally, the therapeutic potential of paquinimod, a calprotectin inhibitor, in mitigating airway inflammation and restoring steroid response signatures in the mouse model was evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated upregulation of calprotectin expression in asthmatic bronchial fibroblasts compared to healthy controls, as well as in refractory asthma samples compared to non-refractory asthma. IL-17 stimulation induced calprotectin expression and dysregulated glucocorticoid response signatures in lung epithelial and fibroblast cells. Treatment with paquinimod reversed IL-17-induced dysregulation of steroid signatures, indicating the involvement of calprotectin in this process. In the HDM/cdiGMP mouse model, paquinimod significantly attenuated airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, and restored steroid response signatures, whereas dexamethasone showed limited efficacy. Mechanistically, paquinimod inhibited MAPK/ERK and NF-κB pathways downstream of calprotectin, leading to reduced lung inflammation. Conclusion: These findings highlight calprotectin as a potential therapeutic target regulated by IL-17 in steroid hyporesponsive asthma. Targeting calprotectin may offer a promising approach to alleviate airway inflammation and restore steroid responsiveness in severe asthma. Further investigations are warranted to explore its therapeutic potential in clinical settings and elucidate its broader implications in steroid mechanisms of action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical remission has recently been proposed as a possible treatment goal even in severe asthma. In this real-world study, we aimed to assess the achievement rate and predictive factors of clinical remission using omalizumab in patients with severe asthma. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with severe asthma initiated with omalizumab therapy and recruited from the asthma clinic of the Akdeniz University Hospital, Turkey. Clinical remission was defined as patients who received no oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy; showed no exacerbations; showed an asthma control questionnaire score of ≤ 1, asthma control test (ACT) of ≥ 20, or both and, FEV1 of ≥ 80% predicted. Results: A total of 58 patients were included in the study, with an average age of 56.4 ± 13.6 years. The mean duration of asthma was 23.5 ± 11.8 years and the mean duration of omalizumab treatment was 80.05 ± 35.04 months. Clinical remission rates were 25.9% in the first and second year, 34.0% in the third year, 34.1% in the fourth year and 47.4% in the fifth year. Pre-omalizumab ACT, FEV1 (%) and OCS use were significantly higher in patients with clinical remission at 1 year. Logistic regression analyses showed that none of the factors predicted clinical remission. Conclusion: Omalizumab has the potential to induce disease remission in a significant proportion of people with severe asthma, and this is maintained and improved over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Although respiratory distress is encountered infrequently in equine practice, it can be serious and potentially fatal, requiring immediate and decisive intervention. History and physical examination can often give sufficient clues to identify the cause of respiratory distress and initiate emergency treatment. Ultrasonography can also be invaluable when assessing distress caused by lower respiratory tract issues. Upper respiratory tract obstruction, tension pneumothorax and occasionally pulmonary oedema can be rapidly fatal and require immediate intervention by emergency tracheotomy, thoracocentesis and evacuation of pleural air or administration of furosemide and oxygen, if available. Acute severe asthma and substantial pleural effusion are often not an immediate threat to life but nonetheless require fast intervention including administration of bronchodilators and corticosteroids or pleurocentesis, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in asthmatic breath may be associated with sputum eosinophilia. We developed a volatile biomarker signature to predict sputum eosinophilia in asthma. Methods: VOCs emitted into the space above sputum samples (headspace) from patients with severe asthma (n = 36) were collected onto sorbent tubes and analyzed using thermal desorption gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Elastic net regression identified stable VOCs associated with sputum eosinophilia ⩾ 3% and generated a volatile biomarker signature. This VOC signature was validated in breath samples from: 1) patients with acute asthma according to blood eosinophilia ⩾0.3 × 109cells/L or sputum eosinophilia of ⩾3% in the UK EMBER (East Midlands Breathomics Pathology Node) consortium (n = 65) and 2) U-BIOPRED-IMI (Unbiased Biomarkers in Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes Innovative Medicines Initiative) consortium (n = 42). Breath samples were collected onto sorbent tubes (EMBER) or Tedlar bags (U-BIOPRED) and analyzed by GC-MS (GC × GC-MS for EMBER or GC-MS for U-BIOPRED). Measurements and Main Results: The in vitro headspace identified 19 VOCs associated with sputum eosinophilia, and the derived VOC signature yielded good diagnostic accuracy for sputum eosinophilia ⩾3% in headspace (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.99; P < 0.0001), correlated inversely with sputum eosinophil percentage (rs = −0.71; P < 0.0001), and outperformed fractional exhaled nitric oxide (AUROC 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35–0.86). Analysis of exhaled breath in replication cohorts yielded a VOC signature AUROC (95% CI) for acute asthma exacerbations of 0.89 (0.76–1.0) (EMBER cohort) with sputum eosinophilia and 0.90 (0.75–1.0) in U-BIOPRED, again outperforming fractional exhaled nitric oxide in U-BIOPRED (0.62 [0.33–0.90]). Conclusions: We have discovered and provided early-stage clinical validation of a volatile biomarker signature associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Further work is needed to translate our discovery using point-of-care clinical sensors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MicroRNA (miR)-155-5p increases in innate and adaptive immune cells in response to IL-13 and is associated with the severity of asthma. However, little is known about its role in airway structural cells. Bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) isolated from healthy donors and patients with severe asthma were stimulated with IL-13. miR-155-5p expression and release were measured by real-time (RT)-PCR in BECs and in their derived exosomes. Modulation of miR-155-5p in BECs was performed using transfection of miR-155-5p inhibitor and mimic. IL-13 receptor α1 (IL-13Rα1), IL-13Rα2, MUC5AC, IL-8, and eotaxin-1 expression was measured by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. The BEC repair process was assessed by a wound-healing assay. IL-13Rα1 and IL-13Rα2 expression and downstream pathways were evaluated by Western blot analysis. A dual luciferase assay was used to identify miR-155-5p target genes associated with IL-13R signaling. BECs from patients with severe asthma showed increased expression and exosomal release of miR-155-5p at baseline with amplification by IL-13 stimulation. BECs from patients with asthma expressed more IL-13Rα1 and less IL-13Rα2 than those from healthy donors, and IL-13Rα1 but not IL-13Rα2 induced miR-155-5p expression under IL-13 stimulation. miR-155-5p overexpression favored MUC5AC, IL-8, and Eotaxin-1 through the IL-13Rα1/SOCS1/STAT6 pathway while delaying the repair process by downregulating IL-13Rα2/MAPK14/c-Jun/c-fos signaling. The dual luciferase assay confirmed that miR-155-5p modulates both IL-13R pathways by directly targeting SOCS1, c-fos, and MAPK14. miR-155-5p is overexpressed in BECs from patients with severe asthma and regulates IL-13Rα1 and IL-13Rα2 expression and signaling, favoring expression of mucin- and eosinophil-related genes to the detriment of airway repair. These results show that miR-155-5p may contribute to airway epithelial cell dysfunction in patients with severe asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

People with severe asthma often lead sedentary lifestyles, which adversely affects overall health and asthma-specific outcomes. To inform future sedentary behaviour- interventions, this study aimed to explore perceptions of sedentary behaviour among people with severe asthma. Adults (≥ 18 years) with severe asthma (n = 21) participated in face-to-face interviews. Participants were asked open-ended questions about factors influencing their sitting behaviour. A thematic analysis was conducted on phrases and sentences relevant to sedentary behaviour. Participants were predominantly females (62%), with controlled asthma (median [Q1, Q3]: ACQ6 0.5 [0.2,1.8]) and receiving monoclonal antibody therapy (71%). Almost half of the participants were not meeting the physical activity guidelines (47%) and were sedentary (10.8 [9.7, 11.4] hours of sedentary behaviour per day). The analysis generated four main themes: (1) Sedentary behaviour often stems from habits and routines, (2) Asthma and associated health issues contribute to sedentary behaviour, (3) Participants' responsibilities influence their activity levels, and; (4) Participants' conscious balance between being physically active and sedentary. The results of this qualitative study offers insights into the perspectives of people with severe asthma regarding sedentary behaviour, highlighting the identification of strategies that can be implemented to improve sedentary behaviour in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to study the impact of biological therapies in Saudi Arabia on patients with severe asthma (SA) combined with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in terms of clinical outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort research that was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital of the Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, from March to September 2022 to delineate the effects of 3 biological therapies (dupilumab, benralizumab, and omalizumab) in adults with SA and concomitant CRS. Clinical outcomes assessed included asthma exacerbation frequency, hospitalization rates, use of oral corticosteroids (OCs), and the asthma control test (ACT) scores before and 1 year after biological therapies. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.68. There were 45 (56%) females and 35 (44%) males. There was a notifiable decrease in the frequency of exacerbations and hospitalization and in the number of patients who received OCs after 6 and 12 months of biological therapies compared to pre-biological therapies, respectively (p < 0.001 each), while there was a significant increase in the ACT scores at 6 and 12 months post-biological therapies, compared to pre-biological therapies, respectively (p < 0.001). These significant differences were maintained with all the 3 biologics used. Conclusions: Results from the first study from two large Saudi Arabian tertiary centers for patients with SA and CRS agree with and support those of worldwide real-life ones. One-year follow-up showed the effectiveness of the 3 drugs in terms of reduced frequency of asthma hospitalizations and exacerbations, the use of OCs, and improved ACT scores. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intruduction and purpose: Patients with severe asthma account for approximately 3% to 10% of all asthma patients. They have higher hospital utilization rates and treatment costs than patients with non-severe asthma. Previously, treatment options for these patients were limited due to unacceptable side effects. However, the advent of biologic therapies has provided promising targeted therapy for these patients. State of knowledge: Biologic therapies target inflammatory modulators that play a key role in the pathogenesis of asthma, particularly in patients with high T2 cells. These therapies have shown promising results in reducing asthma symptoms, improving lung function, decreasing the use of oral corticosteroids, and enhancing patients' quality of life. Conclusions: This article reviews the mechanism of action, efficacy, and indications of currently approved biologic drugs available in Poland, as well as potential therapeutic targets for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An increasing amount of evidence supports the relevance of epithelium across the wide spectrum of asthma pathobiology. On a clinical ground tezepelumab, selectively binding TSLP, a major epithelial cytokine, has demonstrated to be effective in asthma patients regardless their specific phenotype. In order to avoid the risk of considering tezepelumab as a not-specific option, the present perspective aims to sketch the tezepelumab best eligible patient profile and to propose some hallmarks of epithelial-driven disease by reviewing the published evidence on the drug mechanism of action and efficacy data. Main body: Although it cannot rely on standardised or exclusive "markers", the relationship between environment and poor asthma control might suggest a major relevance of the epithelial barrier dysfunction. In that light, allergy and asthma exacerbations concomitant with specific exposures (pathogens, pollutants, chemicals), as well as increased susceptibility to infections can be considered as the hallmark of an impaired epithelial immune response. Tezepelumab is effective in allergic patients, being able to reduce asthma exacerbations precipitated by the exposure to seasonal or perennial aeroallergens, including fungi. In addition, tezepelumab reduced the incidence of co-occurring respiratory illness and asthma exacerbations. In terms of inflammation, epithelial immune response has been related to an impaired mucus hypersecretion and plugging. A placebo-controlled trial demonstrated a significant reduction of mucus plugging in treated patient. Airways hyperreactivity (AHR), airways obstruction and remodelling have been described as an expression of epithelial orchestrated immunological activation. Of note, a significantly higher incidence of mannitol negative test in patients treated with tezepelumab when compared to placebo group has been observed. In addition, A 130 mL improvement in pre-BD FEV1 has been described in patients assuming Tezepelumab. The above-mentioned data suggest that bronchial reversibility and AHR can be considered "functional biomarkers" supporting patients' phenotyping and the identification of tezepelumab best responders. Conclusion: Integrating "functional biomarkers" to the inflammatory ones and a better characterization of asthma exacerbations might pave the way to a different and more transversal phenotyping, which overcomes the "restrictive" labels including T2 high, allergic/atopic or T2 low asthma. Precisely defining the disease characteristics and potential targets for a better control even in tezepelumab eligible subjects is essential to avoid the block buster temptation and optimize the personalized medicine approach according to each patient's individuality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fatigue is a commonly reported clinical symptom, yet research on fatigue in children with severe asthma is missing. We aimed to explore the extent of fatigue in severe pediatric asthma and identify associated factors. Method: This study was conducted within the Pediatric Asthma Non‐Invasive Diagnostic Approaches (PANDA), an observational cohort of 6‐ to 17‐year‐old Dutch children with severe asthma. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL™‐MFS) was used to measure self‐reported fatigue. Fatigue levels were compared with a general pediatric Dutch population using linear regression, and quantifying the prevalence of "fatigued" (−2 < Standard deviations [SD] ≤ −1) and "severely fatigued" (SD ≤ −2) children. Secondly, we performed linear regression analyses to explore whether fatigue levels were independently associated with asthma attacks, comorbidities, medication, pulmonary function, symptom control, and asthma‐related quality of life (QoL). Results: Severe pediatric asthma patients (n = 78, mean age 11.8 ± 3.1 years) reported significantly more fatigue than Dutch peers (n = 328, mean age 11.8 ± 3.2 years) mean difference in z‐score: −0.68; 95%CI −0.96, −0.40. In the severe asthma group, 28.2% scored as "fatigued" and 15.4% as "severely fatigued," compared with 14.0% and 3.4% in the general population. In pediatric asthma patients, asthma‐related QoL (β = 0.77, p <.01, ΔR2 =.43), symptom control (β = 0.56, p <.01, ΔR2 =.24) and a dysfunctional breathing pattern (β = −0.36, p <.01, ΔR2 =.12) were most strongly associated with fatigue scores. Conclusion: Fatigue is a common symptom in children with severe asthma and is associated with multiple clinical factors and patient‐reported outcomes. It should be considered as an important treatment target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe asthma is a challenging condition that often resists traditional treatments and requires high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and other controllers to manage uncontrolled symptoms. Recent advances include the use of biologic agents targeting specific inflammation pathways, which have improved symptom control and quality of life, although their effects on small airways remain less understood. Methods: This prospective observational study, conducted at Tor Vergata University Hospital in Rome from July 2021 to March 2024, aims to evaluate the efficacy of treatments in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. It involves baseline assessments and follow-ups at 1 and 3 months post-biological therapy initiation, focusing on both spirometric and non-spirometric (oscillometry) measurements of the small airways to provide a comprehensive evaluation of respiratory function. Results: This study, conducted from July 2021 to March 2024, enrolled 40 patients with severe asthma, ultimately analyzing data from 31 participants who underwent biological therapy. The results showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms, the ACT scores increased significantly from visit 1 to visit 2 (p = 0.00008) and from visit 1 to visit 3 (p = 0.00047), and pulmonary function tests, with notable increases in FEV1 (from visit 1 (74.97 ± 23.43%) to visit 2 (82.96 ± 26.57%, p = 0.041) and to visit 3 (88.89 ± 31.41%, p = 0.003)) and quality of life scores, and substantial reductions in specific airway resistance and small airway dysfunction markers (the PEF, %pr post-BD showed significant improvement from visit 1 to visit 3 (p = 0.012)). However, oscillometric measurements showed no significant changes post-therapy. Conclusions: The study concluded that there was an improvement in the small airways measured by non-oscillometric values, without significant improvements in oscillometric parameters. Additionally, a significant improvement in symptoms was observed after the first month of therapy. There was also a significant increase in respiratory function after one to three months of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: Sensitization to specific IgE Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins (SEs) is associated with an increased risk for severe asthma development. Limited data exist regarding the association of seropositivity for specific IgE SEs and the different aspects of severe asthma. We aimed to determine whether the presence of SEs is associated with asthma-related parameters such as inflammatory cells in the airways, features of airway remodeling, and other variables relating to asthma assessment and severity. Methods: Fifty patients with severe asthma were recruited in the study. Demographics, comorbidities, asthma duration, and asthma medication were recorded by treating physicians. Specific IgE SE measurement, lung function, atopic status, asthma control test (ACT), sputum induction, bronchoscopy with BAL, and indices of airway remodeling were also assessed. Results: Twelve patients were positive to enterotoxin sensitization. Patients seropositive to specific IgE SEs significantly differed in regard to FEV1% pred and FEV1/FVC ratio compared to seronegative ones. Analyzing the inflammatory variables obtained from induced sputum, BAL, and endobronchial biopsies, the only significant difference was that of smooth muscle area (SMA), which was greater in specific IgE SE seropositive patients. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed two significant associations of specific IgE SE seropositivity. We found a negative with FEV1% pred with beta standardized coefficient 95%CI −0.054 (−0.083, −0.031), p < 0.001, and a positive with SMA with beta standardized coefficient 95%CI 0.054 (0.081, 0.037), p < 0.001. Conclusions: Seropositivity to specific IgE SEs in severe asthma is associated with more severe airflow limitation, obstruction, and upregulation in SMA, indicating a possible role in the remodeling process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective Methods Results Conclusion Severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease with subtype classification according to dominant airway infiltrates, including eosinophilic (Type 2 high), or non‐eosinophilic asthma. Non‐eosinophilic asthma is further divided into paucigranulocytic or neutrophilic asthma characterized by elevated neutrophils, and mixed Type 1 and Type 17 cytokines in the airways. Severe non‐eosinophilic asthma has few effective treatments and many patients do not qualify for biologic therapies. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is dysregulated in multiple respiratory diseases including cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and has proven a valuable therapeutic target. We hypothesized that the CFTR may also play a role in non‐eosinophilic asthma.Patient‐derived human bronchial epithelial cells (hBECs) were isolated and differentiated at the air‐liquid interface. Single cell RNA‐sequencing (scRNAseq) was used to identify epithelial cell subtypes and transcriptional activity. Ion transport was investigated with Ussing chambers and immunofluorescent quantification of ionocyte abundance in human airway epithelial cells and murine models of asthma.We identified that hBECs from patients with non‐eosinophilic asthma had reduced CFTR function, and did not differentiate into CFTR‐expressing ionocytes compared to those from eosinophilic asthma or healthy donors. Similarly, ionocytes were also diminished in the airways of a murine model of neutrophilic‐dominant but not eosinophilic asthma. Treatment of hBECs from healthy donors with a neutrophilic asthma‐like inflammatory cytokine mixture led to a reduction in ionocytes.Inflammation‐induced loss of CFTR‐expressing ionocytes in airway cells from non‐eosinophilic asthma may represent a key feature of disease pathogenesis and a novel drug target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this document, 9 Indian experts have evaluated the factors specific to LMICs when it came to Severe Asthma (SA) diagnosis, evaluation, biologic selection, non-biologic treatment options, and follow-up. Data sources: A search was performed using 50 keywords, focusing on the Indian/LMICs perspective, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The key areas of the search were focused on diagnosis, phenoendotyping, non-biological therapies, selecting a biologic, assessment of treatment response, and management of exacerbation. Study selections: The initial search revealed 1826 articles, from these case reports, observational studies, cohort studies, non-English language papers, etc., were excluded and we short-listed 20 articles for each area. Five relevant articles were selected by the experts for review. Results: In LMICs, SA patients may be referred to the specialist for evaluation a little late for Phenoendotyping of SA. While biologic therapy is now a standard of care, pulmonologists in LMICs may not have access to all the investigations to phenoendotype SA patients like fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), skin prick test (SPT), etc., but phenotyping of SA patients can also be done with simple blood investigations, eosinophil count and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE). Choosing a biologic in the overlapping phenotype of SA and ACO patients is also a challenge in the LMICs. Conclusions: Given the limitations of LMIC, it is important to select the right patient and explain the potential benefits of biological therapy. Non-biologic add-on therapies can be attempted in a resource-limited setting where biological therapy is not available/feasible for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify genetic biomarkers and cellular communications associated with severe asthma in microarray data sets and single cell data sets. The potential gene expression levels were verified in a mouse model of asthma.Methods: We identified differentially expressed genes from the microarray datasets (GSE130499 and GSE63142) of severe asthma, and then constructed models to screen the most relevant biomarkers to severe asthma by machine learning algorithms (LASSO and SVM-RFE), with further validation of the results by GSE43696. Single-cell datasets (GSE193816 and GSE227744) were identified for potential biomarker-specific expression and intercellular communication. Finally, The expression levels of potential biomarkers were verified with a mouse model of asthma.Results: The 73 genes were differentially expressed between severe asthma and normal control. LASSO and SVM-RFE recognized three genes BCL3, DDIT4 and S100A14 as biomarkers of severe asthma and had good diagnostic effect. Among them, BCL3 transcript level was down-regulated in severe asthma, while S100A14 and DDIT4 transcript levels were up-regulated. The transcript levels of the three genes were confirmed in the mouse model. Infiltration of neutrophils and mast cells were found to be increased in severe asthma and may be associated with bronchial epithelial cells through BMP and NRG signalingConclusions: We identified three differentially expressed genes (BCL3, DDIT4 and S100A14) of diagnostic significance that may be involved in the development of severe asthma and these gene expressions could be serviced as biomarker of severe asthma and investigating the function roles could bring new insights into the underlying mechanisms [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experience high risk of exacerbations and reduced quality of life. Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody binding to IL-5 receptor α subunit, is an approved drug for its treatment. The objective was to describe clinical remission after benralizumab prescription in routine clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study with data from four hospitals in Valencian Community (Spain) with asthma units between 2019 and 2020. Data was gathered at baseline and after 12 months. We considered clinical remission after 1 year if the patient remained without exacerbations and use of systemic corticosteroids and with good clinical control and normal lung function. Results: Data from 139 patients was gathered. At the 12-month follow-up, 44.1% were in clinical remission, since 84.0%, 77.5%, 51.0% and 95.5% of patients did not experience exacerbations, had total asthma control test score of ≥20, prebronchodilator FEV1 of ≥80% and did not use systemic corticosteroids. A significant reduction of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (p = 0.0001), leukotriene receptor antagonists (p = 0.0326), oral corticosteroids (p < 0.0001) and short-acting beta agonists (p = 0.0499) was observed. Baseline factors with greatest individual influence on clinical remission were employment situation, tobacco use, comorbidity number, eosinophil value, number of exacerbations, FEV1, emergency visit number, and ACT, MiniAQLQ and TAI scores. Final analysis of multiple logistic regression indicated that having baseline FEV1 value below 80% increases remission chance 9.7 times a year compared to FEV1 >80%. Conclusion: Clinical remission after treatment with benralizumab is achievable in a high percentage of patients with severe asthma eosinophilia not controlled in real life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Switching biologics is now common practice in severe eosinophilic asthma. After insufficient response to anti–IL-5 or 5 receptor (anti–IL-5/5R), the optimal switch between an anti–IL-4R mAb (interclass) or another anti–IL-5/5R drug (intraclass) remains unknown. We sought to compare the effectiveness of these 2 strategies in asthma control in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and insufficient response to an anti–IL-5/5R mAb. We emulated a target randomized trial using observational data from the Recherche sur les AsthMes SEvèreS (RAMSES) cohort. Eligible patients were switched to an anti–IL-4R mAb or another anti–IL-5/5R drug after insufficient response to an anti–IL-5/5R mAb. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Test score at 6 months. Among the 2046 patients in the cohort, 151 were included in the study: 103 switched to an anti–IL-4R mAb and 48 to another anti–IL-5/5R. At 6 months, the difference in Asthma Control Test score improvement was not statistically significant (mean difference groups, 0.82 [−0.47 to 2.10], P =.213). The interclass group exhibited greater cumulative reduction in oral corticosteroid dose (P inter-intra , −1.05 g [−1.76 to −0.34], P =.041). The interclass group had a better effect, although not significantly, on reducing exacerbations (Δ inter-intra , −0.37 [−0.77 to 0.02], P =.124) and increasing lung function (FEV 1) (126.8 mL [−12.7 to 266.4], P =.124). After anti–IL-5/5R mAb insufficient response, switching to dupilumab demonstrated similar improvement in Asthma Control Test scores compared with intraclass switching. However, it appeared more effective in reducing oral corticosteroid use. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disorder. This study aimed to identify changes in gene expression and molecular mechanisms associated with moderate to severe asthma. Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed in GSE69683 dataset among moderate asthma and its controls as well as between severe asthma and moderate asthma. Key module genes were identified via co-expression analysis, and the molecular mechanism of the module genes was explored through enrichment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). GSE89809 was used to verify the characteristic genes related to moderate and severe asthma. Results: Accordingly, 2540 DEGs were present between moderate asthma and the control group, while 6781 DEGs existed between severe asthma and moderate asthma. These genes were identified into 14 co-expression modules. Module 7 had the highest positive correlation with severe asthma and was recognized to be a key module by STEM. Enrichment analysis demonstrated that the module genes were mainly involved in oxidative stress-related signaling pathways. The expression of HSPA1A, PIK3CG and PIK3R6 was associated with moderate asthma, while MAPK13 and MMP9 were associated with severe asthma. The AUC values were verified by GSE89809. Additionally, 322 drugs were predicted to target five genes. Conclusion: These results identified characteristic genes related to moderate and severe asthma and their corresponding molecular mechanisms, providing a basis for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Guidelines recommend systemic corticosteroids and inhaled β-agonists for patients with severe asthma exacerbation who are admitted to intensive care units. The benefits and utilization of adjunct treatments after guideline-recommended first-line treatments have been initiated are unclear. Objectives: Examine practice patterns of adjunct interventions in US intensive care units (ICUs) and their associations with outcomes for adults with severe asthma exacerbations. Methods: Using the multicenter PINC AI Healthcare Database of Premier Inc. (2016–2022), we sought to explore the use of adjunct interventions (medications [e.g., magnesium, leukotriene inhibitors, terbutaline, heliox] and procedures [e.g., invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation]) for adult patients admitted to U.S. ICUs with acute asthma exacerbations. We used hierarchical generalized linear models to calculate risk-adjusted rates of adjunct interventions and quantified between-hospital variation in adjunct interventions using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; higher values correspond to higher between-hospital variation). We then used K-means clustering to identify groups of hospitals with similar risk-adjusted practice profiles of all adjunct treatments and examined associations between identified hospital clusters and patient outcomes. Results: We identified 62,392 patients from 961 hospitals for inclusion. Adjunct interventions with the highest between-hospital variation after risk adjustment were heliox (ICC, 91%), inhaled steroids (ICC, 23%), invasive mechanical ventilation (ICC, 21%), terbutaline (ICC, 22%), paralytics (ICC, 16%), and noninvasive ventilation (ICC, 15%). K-means clustering identified two distinct hospital clusters: Patients who were admitted to Cluster 1 hospitals (399 hospitals) had higher risk-adjusted rates of noninvasive ventilation (51% vs. 33%), compared with patients who were admitted to Cluster 2 hospitals (234 hospitals), which had higher risk-adjusted rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (63% vs. 30%). Cluster 2 was associated with fewer hospital-free days (β = −0.75 d; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.95, −0.55) and increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI = 1.17, 1.40). Conclusions: The use of adjunct interventions for patients with severe asthma exacerbations vary widely across U.S. hospitals; however, hospitals generally fall into two clusters differentiated primarily by the use of invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. The cluster favoring noninvasive mechanical ventilation was associated with improved outcomes. Our results help to inform usual-care arms of future comparative effectiveness studies and efforts to standardize asthma practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionSevere asthma, which differs significantly from typical asthma, involves specific molecular biomarkers that enhance our understanding and diagnostic capabilities. The objective of this study is to assess the biological processes underlying severe asthma and to detect key molecular biomarkers.We used Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to detect hub genes in the GSE143303 dataset and indicated their functions and regulatory mechanisms using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) annotations. In the GSE147878 dataset, we used Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to determine the regulatory directions of gene sets. We detected differentially expressed genes in the GSE143303 and GSE64913 datasets, constructed a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model, and validated the model using the GSE147878 dataset and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to confirm the molecular biomarkers.Using WGCNA, we discovered modules that were strongly correlated with clinical features, specifically the purple module (r = 0.53) and the midnight blue module (r = −0.65). The hub genes within these modules were enriched in pathways related to mitochondrial function and oxidative phosphorylation. GSEA in the GSE147878 dataset revealed significant enrichment of upregulated gene sets associated with oxidative phosphorylation and downregulated gene sets related to asthma. We discovered 12 commonly regulated genes in the GSE143303 and GSE64913 datasets and developed a LASSO regression model. The model corresponding to lambda.min selected nine genes, including TFCP2L1, KRT6A, FCER1A, and CCL5, which demonstrated predictive value. These genes were significantly upregulated or under expressed in severe asthma, as validated by RT-qPCR.Mitochondrial abnormalities affecting oxidative phosphorylation play a critical role in severe asthma. Key molecular biomarkers like TFCP2L1, KRT6A, FCER1A, and CCL5, are essential for detecting severe asthma. This research significantly enhances the understanding and diagnosis of severe asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionSevere asthma presents significant management challenges, often requiring advanced treatments to control symptoms and reduce exacerbations. The use of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the clinical course of patients with severe asthma, showing a significant impact on exacerbations reduction, oral corticosteroids (OCS) cessation and on the improvement of lung function and quality of life. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for these patients.We conducted an observational, prospective, multicenter study including 20 patients with confirmed severe asthma according to ERS guidelines and GINA recommendations. Patients received Tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 wk due to uncontrolled asthma despite maximal inhalation treatment with ICS/LABA. Data were collected before treatment initiation (T0) and after three months from the first administration (T3).After three months of Tezepelumab treatment, we reported significant improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life, as well as a consistent reduction in exacerbations and OCS use. We found no statistically meaningful differences among main clinical and functional outcomes according to inflammatory biomarkers, while lung function improved significantly in patients with less allergic sensitization. No serious adverse event was reported during the follow up, while the rates of mild adverse effects were comparable to those from registration trials.Tezepelumab demonstrated short-term efficacy in improving asthma control and quality of life, showing a favorable safety profile. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up would confirm these findings and identify predictors of response to Tezepelumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe asthma (SA) poses a significant challenge to management and treatment, leading to a reduced quality of life and a heavy burden on society and healthcare resources. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has emerged as a non-pharmacological intervention for SA, demonstrating its efficacy and safety in improving patients' quality of life and reducing exacerbation rates for over a decade. In particular, BT encounters various obstacles in its clinical application. Since asthma is characterized by high heterogeneity, not all patients derive effective outcomes from BT. Furthermore, current knowledge of markers that indicate response to BT remains limited. Recent research has shed light on the intricate mechanism of action of BT, which extends beyond simple smooth muscle ablation. Therefore, to enhance the clinical practice and implementation of BT, this paper aims to elucidate the mechanism of action and identify potential markers associated with BT response. Plain language summary: A review of a non-drug treatment for asthma to better understand the potential mechanisms and markers of the treatment A non-drug treatment for asthma: Severe asthma leads to a low quality of life and places a heavy burden on society and healthcare resources. A non-drug treatment for asthma called bronchial thermoplasty is a technique that uses high temperatures to remove excess airway muscle. Its efficacy and safety in improving asthma patients' quality of life have been demonstrated for more than a decade. Barriers to the treatment development: When it comes to clinical application, bronchial thermoplasty faces several barriers. Asthma is characterized by high variability, and not all patients have good outcomes from bronchial thermoplasty. Understanding of the effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty remains limited. New insights into how the treatment works: Recent research has found that the effect of bronchial thermoplasty is complicated and goes beyond simple muscle removal. What is the aim of this review: To improve the use of bronchial thermoplasty by discussing its effects on the body and identifying ways to measure how effective the treatment is. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document presents two studies on the use of reslizumab as a treatment for severe asthma with persistent sputum eosinophilia. The first study examines the effects of higher doses of reslizumab on sputum eosinophils in patients who did not respond to the standard dose. The study found that 40% of patients achieved normalized sputum eosinophils after four infusions, while the remaining 60% required a higher dose. The second study focuses on the use of inhaled corticosteroids and found that higher doses of reslizumab led to better suppression of eosinophils and improved asthma control. The studies highlight the potential benefits of higher doses of reslizumab in treating severe asthma with persistent sputum eosinophilia and the importance of assessing and classifying patients based on sputum cytokines. [Extracted from the article]

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionsThis study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of allergic patients (AP) and non-allergic patients (NAP) with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with anti-IL5/IL5R biologic agents (mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab) over one year. Sub-analyses assessed treatment response variations between AP and NAP based on the biological used and compared outcomes among AP with and without fungal allergy.Observational retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, oral corticosteroid (OCS) usage, and exacerbation frequency were assessed at the initiation of biological treatment and after one year.Sixty-five patients with SEA were included, 41 AP and 24 NAP. 55.4% were treated with mepolizumab, 33.8% with benralizumab, and 10.8% with reslizumab. Before anti-IL5/5R treatment, AP had worse baseline outcomes but there were no differences in pulmonary function. Mean annual exacerbation rate and percentage of patients requiring OCS and dose of prednisone were higher in AP than NAP. AP had significantly higher total IgE values. After one year of treatment, more AP discontinued OCS than NAP (p = 0.025). Both experienced a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency (p = 0.001) and improved respiratory function. 70.7% of AP and 60% of NAP improved ACT ≥3 points. There was no significant difference between AP and NAP using mepolizumab (p = 0.145) or benralizumab (p = 0.174) in reducing OCS.Anti-IL5/IL5R reduced the need for OCS and improved asthma control, regardless of allergic status. Fungal allergy led to lower ACT scores and higher exacerbations than other allergens; both groups improved with anti-IL5/ILR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe asthma (SA) encompasses several clinical phenotypes with a heterogeneous airway microbiome. We determined the phenotypes associated with a low α‐diversity microbiome. Methods: Metagenomic sequencing was performed on sputum samples from SA participants. A threshold of 2 standard deviations below the mean of α‐diversity of mild‐moderate asthma and healthy control subjects was used to define those with an abnormal abundance threshold as relative dominant species (RDS). Findings: Fifty‐one out of 97 SA samples were classified as RDSs with Haemophilus influenzae RDS being most common (n = 16), followed by Actinobacillus unclassified (n = 10), Veillonella unclassified (n = 9), Haemophilus aegyptius (n = 9), Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (n = 7), Propionibacterium acnes (n = 5), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 5) and Tropheryma whipplei (n = 5). Haemophilus influenzae RDS had the highest duration of disease, more exacerbations in previous year and greatest number on daily oral corticosteroids. Hierarchical clustering of RDSs revealed a C2 cluster (n = 9) of highest relative abundance of exclusively Haemophilus influenzae RDSs with longer duration of disease and higher sputum neutrophil counts associated with enrichment pathways of MAPK, NF‐κB, TNF, mTOR and necroptosis, compared to the only other cluster, C1, which consisted of 7 Haemophilus influenzae RDSs out of 42. Sputum transcriptomics of C2 cluster compared to C1 RDSs revealed higher expression of neutrophil extracellular trap pathway (NETosis), IL6‐transignalling signature and neutrophil activation. Conclusion: We describe a Haemophilus influenzae cluster of the highest relative abundance associated with neutrophilic inflammation and NETosis indicating a host response to the bacteria. This phenotype of severe asthma may respond to specific antibiotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asthma is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases of childhood with a heterogeneous impact on health and quality of life. Mepolizumab is an antagonist of interleukin-5, indicated as an adjunct therapy for severe refractory eosinophilic asthma in adolescents and children aged >6 years old. We present the case of a 9 year-old boy with severe asthma who experienced several asthmatic exacerbations following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, necessitating therapy with short-acting bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids, and hospitalization. We follow the patient using validated questionnaires for the evaluation of asthma control: Children Asthma Control Test, Asthma Control Questionnaire, respiratory function tests, and evaluation of exhaled nitric oxide fraction. After 12 weeks from the start of therapy with mepolizumab, we found significant improvements in lung function, a reduction in the degree of bronchial inflammation, and improvements in quality of life. No asthmatic exacerbations have been reported since the initiation of treatment with mepolizumab. Respiratory infections, such as those related to SARS-CoV-2, represent a significant risk factor for exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe forms of asthma. In our experience, following new episodes of exacerbation, the initiation of treatment with mepolizumab has allowed us to improve asthma control and enhance the quality of life of patients from the first doses. Although mepolizumab showed promise in this child with severe asthma during SARS-CoV-2 infection, the results from this single case cannot be generalized. Further studies are needed to confirm its safety and effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with pulmonary function testing (PFT) for predicting the treatment outcome of patients with severe asthma receiving dupilumab. Methods: A total of 31 patients with severe asthma visiting our hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were included in this study, with 28 patients completing a 16-week course of dupilumab treatment. Baseline clinical data, including demographic information, blood eosinophil counts, serum IgE levels, FeNO, asthma control test (ACT), asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and other parameters, were collected. A predictive model using a generalized linear model was established. Results: Following the 16-week course of dupilumab treatment, 22 patients showed effective response based on GETE scores, while 6 patients were nonresponders. Notably, significant improvements were observed in clinical parameters such as blood eosinophil counts, serum IgE levels, FeNO, FEV1, FEV1%, ACT, and ACQ in both response groups (p < 0.05). FeNO and pulmonary function tests demonstrated AUC values of 0.530, 0.561, and 0.765, respectively, in predicting the clinical efficacy of dupilumab, which were lower than when FeNO was combined with FEV1%. The combination of FeNO and FEV1% had a sensitivity of 1.000 and specificity of 0.591 in predicting treatment response. Conclusion: The combined assessment of FeNO and FEV1% provides improved accuracy for predicting the clinical efficacy of dupilumab in managing severe asthma. However, further larger scale clinical studies with comprehensive follow-up data are needed to validate the therapeutic efficacy and applicability across diverse patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Increasing evidence is available about the presence of increased serum concentration of immunoglobulin (Ig) free light chains (FLCs) in both atopic and non‐atopic inflammatory diseases, including severe asthma, providing a possible new biomarker of disease. Methods: We analyzed clinical and laboratory data, including FLCs, obtained from a cohort of 79 asthmatic subjects, clinically classified into different GINA steps. A control group of 40 age‐matched healthy donors (HD) was considered. Particularly, HD have been selected according to the absence of monoclonal components (in order to exclude paraproteinemias), were tested for total IgE (that were in the normal ranges) and were negative for aeroallergens specific IgE. Moreover, no abnormality of common inflammatory markers (i.e., erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‐reactive protein) was detectable. Results: FLC‐k levels were significantly increased in the asthmatic population, compared to the control group. Despite the absence of statistically significant differences in FLC‐λ levels, the FLC‐k/FLC‐λ ratio displayed remarkable differences between the two groups. A positive correlation between FLC‐κ and FLC‐λ levels was found. FLC‐ λ level displayed a significant negative correlation with the FEV1 value. Moreover, the FLC‐κ /FLC‐ λ ratio was negatively correlated with the SNOT‐22 score and a positive correlation was observed between FLCs and Staphylococcus Aureus IgE enterotoxins sensitization. Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the role of FLCs in asthma as a potential biomarker in an inflammatory disease characterized by different endotypes and phenotypes. In particular, FLC‐κ and FLC‐k/FLC‐λ ratio could be a qualitative indicator for asthma, while FLC‐λ levels could be a quantitative indicator for clinical severity parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: One of the fundamental challenges of managing patients with severe asthma is treatment adherence, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids. Adherence is difficult to measure objectively and poor adherence is associated with worse outcomes. In this study, assess the ability of a 'smart' inhaler to record adherence in severe asthma patients and measure the impact of this on asthma control. Methods: Consecutive consenting patients meeting criteria for biologics had their existing high-dose ICS/LABA//LAMA combination inhaler/s switched to mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (114/46/136). Routine clinical data, including blood eosinophils, FeNO, and ACQ-6 scores were collected at baseline and at 4 wk. Adherence was then checked on the Propeller Health app, and good adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed usage. Participants were then followed-up at 12 months to record the proportion of patients who were initiated on biologics Results: 77 patients (mean [SD] age = 50.4 [15.7] years, 67.5% female [n = 52]) participated. 71 participants were able to use the device and 65% (n = 46) of these attained good asthma control and were not initiated on biologics at 12-month follow-up. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in ACQ6 score at follow-up (2.81 vs. 1.92, p < 0.001 and 3.05 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference in improvement between groups. Patients with optimal adherence also demonstrated a significant reduction in median FeNO at follow-up (47 ppb vs. 40 ppb, p = 0.003). Conclusions: In severe asthma patients, 'smart' inhalers may represent an effective management tool to improve adherence and asthma control, therefore avoiding the need for patients to commence biological therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Modification of the immune system with biologics raises theoretical concerns about the risk of infections but it is still unclear whether currently routinely used biologics in severe asthma may facilitate the development of pneumonia. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab are associated with pneumonia in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was performed using adverse event (AE) reports submitted to FAERS from January 2020 to September 30, 2023. MedDRA was used to identify infections and infestations and then pneumonia cases. ROR and PRR were used to measure disproportionality. Results: The percentage of reported cases of pneumonia compared to infections and infestations was highest for mepolizumab (36.8%), followed by omalizumab (32.6%), benralizumab (19.2%) and dupilumab (5.7%). We found a moderate or strong signal for increased risk of pneumonia with mepolizumab (ROR = 3.74, 95%CI 3.50–4.00), omalizumab (ROR = 3.26, 95%CI 3.06–3.49) and benralizumab (ROR = 2.65, 95%CI 2.49–2.83). Conclusions: Mepolizumab, omalizumab and benralizumab, but not dupilumab, were associated with high odds of reporting pneumonia. Our results represent only potential associations between these biologics and pneumonia but not causality. The nature of the FAERS database is such that the cause of the reported events is uncertain. Therefore, we can only roughly estimate the incidence of AEs by the signal strength (ROR value). Nevertheless, although causality could not be assessed, the signal from our study is interesting. We believe it deserves to be further substantiated by real-world studies with robust designs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lactotransferrin (LTF) has an immunomodulatory function, and its expression levels are associated with asthma susceptibility. We sought to investigate LTF messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels in human bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) as an anti–type 2 (T2) asthma biomarker. Association analyses between LTF mRNA expression levels in BECs and asthma-related phenotypes were performed in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) cross-sectional (n = 155) and longitudinal (n = 156) cohorts using a generalized linear model. Correlation analyses of mRNA expression levels between LTF and all other genes were performed by Spearman correlation. Low LTF mRNA expression levels were associated with asthma susceptibility and severity (P <.025), retrospective and prospective asthma exacerbations, and low lung function (P < 8.3 × 10−3). Low LTF mRNA expression levels were associated with high airway T2 inflammation biomarkers (sputum eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide; P < 8.3 × 10−3) but were not associated with blood eosinophils or total serum IgE. LTF mRNA expression levels were negatively correlated with expression levels of T H 2 or asthma-associated genes (POSTN, NOS2, and MUC5AC) and eosinophil-related genes (IL1RL1, CCL26, and IKZF2) and positively correlated with expression levels of T H 1 and inflammation genes (IL12A, MUC5B, and CC16) and T H 17-driven cytokines or chemokines for neutrophils (CXCL1, CXCL6, and CSF3) (P < 3.5 × 10−6). Low LTF mRNA expression levels in BECs are associated with asthma susceptibility, severity, and exacerbations through upregulation of airway T2 inflammation. LTF is a potential anti-T2 biomarker, and its expression levels may help determine the balance of eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Neutrophilic asthma (NA) is a severe asthma phenotype associated with steroid resistance and IL-1β overproduction; however, the exact mechanism remains unclear. Moreover, the dysfunction of TNF-α signaling pathway, a regulator of IL-1β production, was associated with the deficiency of ovarian tumor protease deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity (otulin) in autoimmune patients. We hypothesized that otulin downregulation in macrophages (Mφ) could trigger Mφ activation via the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome signaling pathway. We assessed the expressions of otulin in blood monocyte subsets from NA patients and in alveolar Mφ from NA mice. Additionally, we evaluated the functional consequences of otulin deficiency in bone marrow–derived Mφ. The effects of inhibiting receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK)-1 and RIPK-3 on neutrophils and group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) were assessed in vitro and in vivo. When comparing nonclassical monocytes, a significant downregulation of otulin in the intracellular components was observed in NA patients compared to healthy controls (P =.005). Moreover, isolated alveolar Mφ from the NA mice exhibited lower otulin expression compared to those from control mice. After otulin knockdown in bone marrow–derived Mφ, we observed spontaneous IL-1β production depending on NLRP3 inflammasome. Moreover, the infiltrated neutrophils and ILC3s were significantly decreased by combined treatment of RIPK-1 and RIPK-3 inhibitors through blocking IL-1β release in NA. IL-1β overproduction caused by a deficiency of otulin, an upstream triggering factor, could be a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target for NA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Juan Carlos Miralles-López,1,2 Francisco J Alvarez-Gutiérrez,3 Julio Delgado-Romero,4 Santiago Quirce,5,6 Jose Gregorio Soto-Campos,7 Ruben Andújar-Espinosa,2,8 Sheila Cabrejos-Perotti,2,9 Manuel Castilla-Martínez,2,10 Isabel Flores-Martín,2,11 Manuel José Pajarón-Fernández,2,12 José Valverde-Molina2,13,14 1Allergy Department, University General Hospital Reina Sofia, Murcia, Spain; 2Severe Asthma Association of the Region of Murcia. ASGRAMUR, Murcia, Spain; 3Medical and Surgical Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocío, Seville, Spain; 4Allergology Clinical Management Unit, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain; 5Department of Allergy, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; 6CIBER of Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; 7Pneumology and Allergy Clinical Management Unit, University Hospital of Jerez, Jerez, Spain; 8Pulmonology Department. H. U. Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; 9Allergy Department, University General Hospital Santa Lucia, Cartagena, Spain; 10Pulmonology Department, University General Hospital Los Arcos, San Javier, Spain; 11Allergy Department, Hospital Comarcal del Noroeste, Caravaca, Murcia, Spain; 12Allergy Department, Hospital de la Vega Lorenzo Guirao, Cieza, Spain; 13Paediatrics Department, University General Hospital Santa Lucia (Cartagena University Hospital Complex), Cartagena, Spain; 14IMIB Biomedical Research Institute, Murcia, SpainCorrespondence: Juan Carlos Miralles-López, Allergy Department, University General Hospital Reina Sofia, Murcia, Spain, Email juancmiralleslopez@gmail.comPurpose: With the advent of biological therapies, emerging concepts regarding establishing new targets in asthma management, such as disease modification, have entered the debate among the scientific community. The definitions that form the conceptual basis of this goal need to be agreed upon.Methods: A multidisciplinary expert group was assembled as the steering committee. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the scientific background for constructing appropriate definitions. Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the experts, the committee built a list of statements that could be applied to establish the definition of disease modification in asthma. After that, a Delphi validation was performed to assess the appropriateness of the list of statements. The questionnaire included a total of 22 statements, divided into “Essential criteria for disease modification in asthma” (5 statements) and “Disease modification indicators and other considerations” (17 statements). Panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to measure agreement on each statement. The cut-off point for high consensus was defined as a minimum score of 7 and had to be reached by at least two-thirds of the experts.Results: A total of 192 asthma experts voted on statements anonymously. Of those, 104 (54%) were Pneumologists, 65 (34%) were allergologists, and 23 (12%) were Pediatricians. An interim analysis of round 1 data was performed. All statements reached consensus on the first round, with a median score above 7 in all cases.Conclusion: In conclusion, in this Delphi study, a large number of experts in the management of severe asthma from different specialties agreed on the clinical-functional and pathophysiological aspects to be considered in order to try to achieve disease modification.Keywords: severe asthma, disease modification, delphi process, remission

Leonie Biener,1,&ast; Hussein Morobeid,1,&ast; Carmen Pizarro,1 Daniel Kuetting,2 Georg Nickenig,1 Dirk Skowasch1 1Department of Internal Medicine II – Cardiology, Pneumology, Angiology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Leonie Biener, Department of Internal Medicine II – Cardiology, Pneumology, Angiology, University Hospital of Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany, Email Leonie.Biener@ukbonn.deBackground: Patients with severe asthma (SA) benefit from biologic therapy substantially. However, the impact of smoking-related comorbidities remains unclear due to the exclusion of patients with ≥ 10 pack-years from asthma studies. Our aim was to examine the effects of emphysema on biologic treatment response in SA in this retrospective cohort study.Methods: Pulmonary emphysema was examined using computed tomography. Patients with SA were included and divided into two groups based on emphysema quantity (≥ 5% or < 5%). They received either anti-IgE (22.1%), anti-IL-5-(receptor) (52.3%), or anti-IL-4/IL-13 (25.6%) biologic therapy. Treatment response was assessed after 7.8 ± 2.5 months based on acute exacerbations (AE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).Results: This study comprised 86 patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.8 years; 54% female). Half (43, 50.0%) were never-smokers, half ex-smokers with an average of 26.9 ± 18.2 pack-years. Patients with ≥ 5% emphysema were more often ex-smokers (80% vs 41%, p=0.002), had poorer lung function (FEV1 median 1.3 [interquartile range: 1.0;1.6] vs 1.8[1– 2;2.4] L, p=0.037), and more comorbid COPD (50% vs 21%, p=0.012). However, no significant differences were noted in treatment response regarding annualized AE rate (− 2.5[− 5;-1] vs − 3.0[− 5;-2] n/year, p=0.295) and OCS reduction (− 4[− 10;0] vs − 5[− 10;0] mg, p=0.691), ACT score (5[3;9] vs 4[0;9] points, p=0.579) or FEV1 improvement (0.03[− 0.15;0.25] vs 0.23[− 0.5;0.49] L, p=0.052), BARS (p=0.312), and remission rates (15.0% vs 19.7%, p=0.753).Conclusion: In patients with severe asthma, those with comorbid emphysema show similar treatment response to biologic therapy. Therefore, suitable patients should not be denied biologics due to the presence of emphysema.Keywords: severe asthma, emphysema, smoking, biologic therapy

Abstract People with severe asthma often lead sedentary lifestyles, which adversely affects overall health and asthma-specific outcomes. To inform future sedentary behaviour- interventions, this study aimed to explore perceptions of sedentary behaviour among people with severe asthma. Adults (≥ 18 years) with severe asthma (n = 21) participated in face-to-face interviews. Participants were asked open-ended questions about factors influencing their sitting behaviour. A thematic analysis was conducted on phrases and sentences relevant to sedentary behaviour. Participants were predominantly females (62%), with controlled asthma (median [Q1, Q3]: ACQ6 0.5 [0.2,1.8]) and receiving monoclonal antibody therapy (71%). Almost half of the participants were not meeting the physical activity guidelines (47%) and were sedentary (10.8 [9.7, 11.4] hours of sedentary behaviour per day). The analysis generated four main themes: (1) Sedentary behaviour often stems from habits and routines, (2) Asthma and associated health issues contribute to sedentary behaviour, (3) Participants’ responsibilities influence their activity levels, and; (4) Participants’ conscious balance between being physically active and sedentary. The results of this qualitative study offers insights into the perspectives of people with severe asthma regarding sedentary behaviour, highlighting the identification of strategies that can be implemented to improve sedentary behaviour in this population.

Tham T Le,1 David B Price,2– 4 Clement Erhard,5 Bill Cook,6 Anna Quinton,7 Rohit Katial,8 George C Christoff,9 Luis Perez-de-Llano,10 Alan Altraja,11,12 Celine Bergeron,13 Arnaud Bourdin,14 Mariko Siyue Koh,15,16 Lauri Lehtimäki,17,18 Bassam Mahboub,19 Nikolaos G Papadopoulos,20,21 Paul Pfeffer,22,23 Chin Kook Rhee,24 Victoria Carter,2,3 Neil Martin,25,26 Trung N Tran1 On behalf of the EVEREST Study Working Group1BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 2Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; 3Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, UK; 4Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; 5BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 6Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 7BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 8Global Medical Respiratory, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 9Faculty of Public Health, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria; 10Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain; 11Department of Pulmonology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; 12Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia; 13Centre for Lung Health, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 14PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; 15Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; 16Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; 17Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; 18Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; 19Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; 20Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 21Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 22Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; 23Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; 24Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea; 25Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 26University of Leicester, Leicester, UKCorrespondence: Trung N Tran, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, Respiratory and Immunology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Email trung.tran1@astrazeneca.comIntroduction: Patients with severe asthma may be prescribed biologic therapies to improve disease control. The EVEREST study aimed to characterize the global disease burden of patients with severe asthma without access to biologics and those who have access but do not receive biologics, as well as the remaining unmet need despite use of these therapies.Methods: This was a historical cohort study of patients with severe asthma (aged ≥ 18 years) in the International Severe Asthma Registry receiving Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2018 step 5 treatment, or with uncontrolled disease at GINA step 4. Prospective data on patient clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and medication use over a 12-month period between December 2017 and May 2022 were assessed for the following five groups: biologics accessible (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, or dupilumab); biologics inaccessible; biologics accessible but not received; biologics accessible and received; and biologic recipients whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled.Results: Overall, 9587 patients from 21 countries were included. Among patients in the biologics accessible (n=5073), biologics inaccessible (n=3041), and biologics accessible but not received (n=382) groups, 41.4%, 18.7%, and 49.6% experienced at least two exacerbations, 11.5%, 10.5%, and 6.2% required at least one hospitalization, 47.9%, 54.6%, and 71.2% had uncontrolled asthma, and 23.9%, 8.6%, and 11.0% received long-term oral corticosteroids (LTOCS), respectively. Following biologic therapy, among patients who received biologics overall (n=2666) and among those whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled (n=1780), 19.1% and 23.0% experienced at least two exacerbations, 2.7% and 2.9% required at least one hospitalization, and 16.7% and 22.0% received LTOCS, respectively.Conclusion: There is a substantial disease burden in both patients without access to biologics and those with access who do not receive these therapies, although specific outcomes may vary between these groups. There also remains a high unmet need among biologic recipients, many of whom have a suboptimal response to treatment.Keywords: biologic, disease burden, healthcare resource utilization, severe asthma

Victoria S Benson,1,&ast; James Siddall,2,&ast; Adam Haq,2 Mark Small,2 Zhiliu Tang,3 Tao Ye,4 Peter Howarth,5 Anna Richards,6 Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho7 1Epidemiology, Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, London, UK; 2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK; 3Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Medical Affairs, Respiratory, GSK, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, UK; 6Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, London, UK; 7Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Tao Ye, Medical Affairs, Respiratory, GSK, 902 halei Road, Pudong, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Email ark.x.ye@gsk.comPurpose: To inform effective management strategies for severe asthma in China, this study aimed to comprehensively characterize clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, disease control status, and healthcare resource utilization among patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies by analyzing data from the Adelphi Asthma Disease Specific Program conducted in China.Patients and methods: All information was retrieved from medical records or collected from physicians and patients on the survey date (August–December 2018); no follow-up was conducted. Results were summarized descriptively for patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies, who were pooled from a consecutive sample (comprising three or more consecutive patients with physician-diagnosed asthma from each participating physician) and an oversample (comprising the next two patients with physician-perceived severe asthma from each participating physician).Results: Of the included patients (n=754), 51.5% had ever had a blood eosinophil measurement taken, 22.1% had available records for their most recent blood eosinophil measurements (68.9% of them had an elevated level ≥ 150 cells/μL), 39.9% had ever been tested for specific immunoglobulin E or radioallergosorbent, and 8.0% were prescribed maintenance oral corticosteroids. Asthma was not well controlled in 69.2% of patients. In the prior year, 27.1% experienced at least one severe exacerbation and 22.8% experienced at least one hospitalization (emergency visit or overnight stay) due to asthma.Conclusion: In Chinese patients with asthma on GINA Step 4/5 therapies, biomarker testing was underutilized, asthma was not well controlled, and severe exacerbations were not infrequent. These findings highlight the urgent need for optimized asthma management for patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies in China.Keywords: severe asthma, type-2 high asthma, real-world, phenotype, exacerbations, health care resource utilization, eosinophils

Abstract Background We aimed to study the impact of biological therapies in Saudi Arabia on patients with severe asthma (SA) combined with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in terms of clinical outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective observational cohort research that was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital of the Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, from March to September 2022 to delineate the effects of 3 biological therapies (dupilumab, benralizumab, and omalizumab) in adults with SA and concomitant CRS. Clinical outcomes assessed included asthma exacerbation frequency, hospitalization rates, use of oral corticosteroids (OCs), and the asthma control test (ACT) scores before and 1 year after biological therapies. Results Eighty patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.68. There were 45 (56%) females and 35 (44%) males. There was a notifiable decrease in the frequency of exacerbations and hospitalization and in the number of patients who received OCs after 6 and 12 months of biological therapies compared to pre-biological therapies, respectively (p

Abstract Background An increasing amount of evidence supports the relevance of epithelium across the wide spectrum of asthma pathobiology. On a clinical ground tezepelumab, selectively binding TSLP, a major epithelial cytokine, has demonstrated to be effective in asthma patients regardless their specific phenotype. In order to avoid the risk of considering tezepelumab as a not-specific option, the present perspective aims to sketch the tezepelumab best eligible patient profile and to propose some hallmarks of epithelial-driven disease by reviewing the published evidence on the drug mechanism of action and efficacy data. Main body Although it cannot rely on standardised or exclusive “markers”, the relationship between environment and poor asthma control might suggest a major relevance of the epithelial barrier dysfunction. In that light, allergy and asthma exacerbations concomitant with specific exposures (pathogens, pollutants, chemicals), as well as increased susceptibility to infections can be considered as the hallmark of an impaired epithelial immune response. Tezepelumab is effective in allergic patients, being able to reduce asthma exacerbations precipitated by the exposure to seasonal or perennial aeroallergens, including fungi. In addition, tezepelumab reduced the incidence of co-occurring respiratory illness and asthma exacerbations. In terms of inflammation, epithelial immune response has been related to an impaired mucus hypersecretion and plugging. A placebo-controlled trial demonstrated a significant reduction of mucus plugging in treated patient. Airways hyperreactivity (AHR), airways obstruction and remodelling have been described as an expression of epithelial orchestrated immunological activation. Of note, a significantly higher incidence of mannitol negative test in patients treated with tezepelumab when compared to placebo group has been observed. In addition, A 130 mL improvement in pre-BD FEV1 has been described in patients assuming Tezepelumab. The above-mentioned data suggest that bronchial reversibility and AHR can be considered “functional biomarkers” supporting patients’ phenotyping and the identification of tezepelumab best responders. Conclusion Integrating “functional biomarkers” to the inflammatory ones and a better characterization of asthma exacerbations might pave the way to a different and more transversal phenotyping, which overcomes the “restrictive” labels including T2 high, allergic/atopic or T2 low asthma. Precisely defining the disease characteristics and potential targets for a better control even in tezepelumab eligible subjects is essential to avoid the block buster temptation and optimize the personalized medicine approach according to each patient’s individuality.

Dennis K Ledford,1 Warner W Carr,2 Wendy C Moore,3 Njira L Lugogo,4 Arjun Mohan,4 Bradley Chipps,5 Alexander R Mackie,6 Andrew W Lindsley,7 Joseph Spahn,6 Christopher S Ambrose8 1Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; 2Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California, Mission Viejo, CA, USA; 3Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 5Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, CA, USA; 6BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA; 7US Medical Affairs, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; 8BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USACorrespondence: Christopher S Ambrose, AstraZeneca, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA, Tel +1 301-398-4454, Email chris.ambrose@astrazeneca.comPurpose: Younger age of asthma onset (AAO) has been associated with an allergic phenotype, whereas eosinophilic phenotypes have been associated with older AAO. In randomized trials, biologic efficacy among adults with severe asthma (SA) has varied by age at asthma onset. To determine whether these associations observed in trials apply to real-world outcomes, this study examined biologic effectiveness by AAO and biologic class in a large, real-world cohort.Patients and methods: CHRONICLE is an ongoing, real-world study of US adults with subspecialist-treated SA receiving biologics, maintenance corticosteroids, or who are uncontrolled on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. Patients enrolled between February 2018 and February 2022 who initiated a biologic for SA and had complete data for analysis were included. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) analysis was used to plot the relationship between percentage exacerbation rate reduction and AAO by biologic class.Results: Of 578 patients with complete data, 198, 149, and 231 were diagnosed with asthma at age < 18, 18– 39, and ≥ 40 years, respectively. Across subgroups, patients were predominantly White (72– 78%), female (67– 73%), and commercially insured (54– 71%). In the LOESS analysis, exacerbation rate reductions were similar for anti-IgE and anti–IL-5/5R and anti–IL-4R subgroups with younger AAO, but the exacerbation rate reduction diminished for patients with older AAO receiving anti-IgE therapy, particularly with asthma onset age ≥ 40 years.Conclusion: Clinicians should consider age of onset in biologic treatment decisions, given reduced effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with asthma onset at age ≥ 40 years.Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03373045.Keywords: Biologics, severe asthma, anti-interleukin therapy, anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, effectiveness, age of asthma onset

Over the last two decades, we have witnessed great advancements in our understanding of the immunological pathways of asthma, leading to the development of targeted therapies, such as biologic drugs, that have radically and definitively changed the clinical outcomes of severe asthma. Despite the numerous therapeutic options available, ~4–10% of all people with asthma have severe or uncontrolled asthma, associated with an increased risk of developing chronic oral corticosteroid use, fixed airflow limitation, exacerbations, hospitalization and, finally, increased healthcare costs. The new concept of disease modification in asthma comes from the evolution of asthma management, which encompasses phenotyping patients with different inflammatory endotypes characterizing the disease, followed by the advent of more effective therapies capable of targeting the proximal factors of airway inflammation. This treat-to-target approach aims to achieve remission of the disease. Because the novel treatment paradigm for severe asthma with the advent of biologic therapies is no longer clinical control but rather clinical remission – a step closer to the concept of cure – a deeper and more accurate understanding of the critical causal mechanisms and endotypes of asthma is necessary to achieve the goal of clinical remission, which has the potential to generate real life-changing benefits for patients. This review aims to frame the evolution of the debated concept of clinical remission and provide clinicians with insights that may be helpful in achieving remission in the greatest number of patients.

OBJECTIVE: Subphenotypes of asthma may be determined by age onset and atopic status. We sought to characterize early or late onset atopic asthma with fungal or non-fungal sensitization (AAFS or AANFS) and non-atopic asthma (NAA) in children and adults in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP). SARP is an ongoing project involving well-phenotyped patients with mild to severe asthma. METHODS: Phenotypic comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square test. Genetic association analyses were performed using logistic or linear regression. RESULTS: Airway hyper-responsiveness, total serum IgE levels, and T2 biomarkers showed an increasing trend from NAA to AANFS and then to AAFS. Children and adults with early onset asthma had greater % of AAFS than adults with late onset asthma (46% and 40% vs. 32%; P

Objective: Dupilumab has been approved for the treatment of severe asthma with type 2 inflammation by inhibiting interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling. However, dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia (HE) has been reported and should not be ignored. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dupilumab in Chinese patients with severe asthma, whether HE affects its efficacy, and the possible risk factors for HE. Methods: 20 patients with severe asthma who received dupilumab treatment for at least 12 months in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from 2019 to 2022 were included. We compared clinical data and laboratory tests results before dupilumab treatment and at 4 and 12 months after treatment. Based on whether dupilumab treatment triggers HE defined as blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥ 1.5x109 cells/L, the patients were allocated into non-HE and HE groups. Results: The patients showed a significant increase in asthma control test (ACT) scores, a decrease in the number of exacerbations, a decrease in the proportion of patients taking an oral corticosteroid (OCS) and in the dose, and a significant improvement in the pulmonary function parameters FEV1/FVC (%) and FEV1 (% predicted) after 4 and 12months of treatment with dupilumab. For type 2 inflammatory biomarkers, the levels of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), sputum eosinophil count percentage (SEC%) and total immunoglobulin E (TIgE) decreased significantly, whereas BEC were higher after 4months of treatment, but returned to baseline levels after 12 months. 8 patients (40%) developed asymptomatic HE after dupilumab, and the efficacy was not significantly different between the HE and non-HE groups. The earliest BEC elevation appeared at 1month after treatment, but most of them declined after 6months, and basically returned to the baseline level around 12months of treatment. In addition, we further found that when patients had FeNO ≥ 60 ppb, food allergens positive and combined eosinophilic otitis media (EOM), their BEC increased significantly more than that of the control group after 4months as well as 12months of treatment. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that dupilumab was efficacious in Chinese patients with severe asthma, and some patients developed asymptomatic, self-limited HE, which did not affect its efficacy. Additionally, FeNO ≥60 ppb, food allergens positive, and co-morbidities with EOM may be the risk factors for developing HE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Some patients with severe asthma may benefit from treatment with biologics, but evidence has been mostly collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which patients' characteristics are different from those encountered in asthma patients in the real-world setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of complete responders versus non-complete responders to long-term treatment with biologics in patients with severe asthma attended in routine daily practice. Methods: Data of a cohort of 90 patients with severe asthma who were treated with biologics (omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab) for at least 12 months and were followed up to March 2022. Data recorded included clinical characteristics and effectiveness of treatment (exacerbation, Asthma Control Test [ACT] score, lung function, use of maintenance oral corticosteroids [mOCS]), FeNO, and blood eosinophils at baseline, at 12months, and at the end of follow-up. Complete response is considered if, in addition to not presenting exacerbations or the use of mOCS, the ACT score was >20 and, the FEV1 >80% predicted. Results: An improvement in all asthma control parameters was observed after 12months of treatment and a mean follow-up of 55months. After 12months of treatment 27.2% of patients met the criteria of complete response and this percentage even increased to 35.3% at the end of follow-up. Long-term complete response was associated to better lung function with mepolizumab and omalizumab treatment and to less previous exacerbations in the benralizumab group. The main cause of not achieving a complete response was the persistence of an airflow obstructive pattern. Conclusions: This study shows that omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe asthma in a clinic environment with similar effect sizes to RCTs in the long term follow-up. Airflow obstruction, however, was a predictor of a non-complete response to biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that is not sensitive to glucocorticoid treatment. In the pathogenesis of severe asthma, T helper cell 17(Th17) and interleukin 17 (IL-17) play an important role, mainly by aggregating the infiltration of neutrophil to aggravate the severity of asthma. Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MBD2) plays an important role in the differentiation of Th17 cells from naive CD4+T cells,positively regulate Th17 differentiation and IL-17 expression. MBD2 binds to the CpG islands in the promoter region of interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and misshapen like kinase 1(MINK1), which leads to methylation, regulates the differentiation of Th17 cells, and participates in the pathogenesis of severe asthma.

Abstract Background Asthma is a heterogeneous, inflammatory disease with several phenotypes and endotypes. Severe asthmatics often exhibit mixed granulocytosis with reduced corticosteroid sensitivity. Bronchom is a newly developed Ayurvedic prescription medicine, indicated for the treatment of obstructive airway disorders. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the in-vivo efficacy of Bronchom in mouse model of mixed granulocytic asthma with steroidal recalcitrance. Methods High-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) and Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) were employed to identify and quantitate the phytometabolites present in Bronchom. The preclinical effectiveness of Bronchom was assessed in house dust mite (HDM) and Complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-induced mixed granulocytic asthma model in mice. High dose of dexamethasone was tested parallelly. Specific-pathogen-free C57BL/6 mice were immunized with HDM and CFA and nineteen days later, they were intranasally challenged with HDM for four consecutive days. Then the mice were challenged with nebulized methacholine to evaluate airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Inflammatory cell influx was enumerated in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) followed by lung histology. Additionally, the concentrations of Th2 and pro-inflammatory cytokines was assessed in the BALF by multiplexed immune assay. The mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and Mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) was also evaluated in the lung. Results HPTLC fingerprinting and UHPLC quantification of Bronchom revealed the presence of bioactive phytometabolites, namely, rosmarinic acid, gallic acid, methyl gallate, piperine, eugenol and glycyrrhizin. Bronchom effectively reduced AHR driven by HDM-CFA and the influx of total leukocytes, eosinophils and neutrophils in the BALF. In addition, Bronchom inhibited the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lung as well as goblet cell metaplasia. Further, it also suppressed the elevated levels of Th2 cytokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the BALF. Similarly, Bronchom also regulated the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as MUC5AC in mice lungs. Reduced effectiveness of a high dose of the steroid, dexamethasone was observed in the model. Conclusions We have demonstrated for the first time the robust pharmacological effects of an herbo-mineral medicine in an animal model of mixed granulocytic asthma induced by HDM and CFA. The outcomes suggest the potential utility of Bronchom in severe asthmatics with a mixed granulocytic phenotype.

Background: Patients with severe asthma are often dependent on oral corticosteroids (OCS) and have frequent exacerbations. This article aims to report very long-term data of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma assessing asthma control, lung function, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose reduction, and clinical and biological parameters of patients treated with mepolizumab. Methods: Four cases of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were treated for 60 months or more with mepolizumab 100 mg/4 weeks, leading to the stable discontinuation of OCS, are presented. ICS dose, OCS dose and withdrawal date, lung function, eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and asthma control test were recorded as well as exacerbations in the 12 months before commencing mepolizumab and in the 12 months before the last follow-up visit. Results: Three of the patients were men, median age was 52.5 years (range 79–53), median length of asthma before mepolizumab start was 67.5 months (range 24–240), three had chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis and two were atopic. All had eosinophil counts >300 cells/μL at baseline. The median follow-up was 73.5 months (range 71–74), and OCS withdrawal from baseline occurred after a median of 13 months of mepolizumab treatment (range 12–39). A substantial reduction of ICS treatment was registered as well as improvement in asthma control test, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and functional parameters, and a significant reduction of exacerbations in the last 12 months before last visit was observed as compared to the 12 months before baseline (from a median of 4 (range 3–6) to 0; p=0.0286). Conclusions: Mepolizumab could be a ‘disease-modifying’ agent, with high tolerability and a good efficacy profile in the long term.

Abstract Background This study’s purposes were to evaluate the impact of biological therapies on outcomes in patients with severe asthma (SA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to compare these effects among those with NP (CRSwNP) versus those without NP (CRSsNP) in the “real-world” setting in Saudi Arabian patients. Methods From March to September 2022, a retrospective observational cohort study was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital—Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, to delineate the effects of dupilumab therapy. Outcomes were assessed, including clinical outcomes, FEV1, and laboratory findings before and one year after dupilumab. Post-therapy effects were compared between CRSwNP and CRSsNP. Results Fifty subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.56. There were 27 (54%) females and 23(46%) males. Significant improvements in clinical parameters (frequency of asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, the use of OCs, anosmia, SNOTT-22, and the ACT), FEV1, and laboratory ones (serum IgE and eosinophilic count) were observed 6 and 12 months after using dupilumab (p