1. Implementation and use of the Safewards model in healthcare services: A scoping review.
- Author
-
Ward‐Stockham, Kristel, Daniel, Catherine, Bujalka, Helena, Jarden, Rebecca J., Yap, Celene Y. L., Cochrane, Lindy, and Gerdtz, Marie Frances
- Subjects
- *
MENTAL health services , *HUMAN services programs , *NURSING models , *MEDICAL care , *CONFLICT (Psychology) , *CINAHL database , *AGGRESSION (Psychology) , *SYSTEMATIC reviews , *MEDLINE , *MEDICAL databases , *PSYCHIATRIC nursing , *PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems - Abstract
Safewards is a multi‐intervention mental health nursing model of practice improvement aimed at preventing and reducing conflict and containment. The use of Safewards has now extended beyond mental health settings. Implementation of Safewards has been reported to be challenging and therefore requires an evidence‐informed and structured approach. This review's objectives were to: (i) Comprehensively map approaches used to implement Safewards interventions; (ii) Characterise the outcomes measured in Safewards implementation studies; and (iii) Identify the facilitators and barriers to Safewards training and its implementation in practice. All quantitative, qualitative and mixed‐methods publications of Safewards, the interventions, evaluations, barriers and facilitators from all healthcare services internationally were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews were used to guide methodology. Data were reported according to the 12 items of the TIDieR. Twenty‐seven publications reported the implementation of Safewards. Descriptions were limited for reporting items such as intervention descriptions, materials, resources, specific procedures and processes, modifications made to interventions and delivery of interventions and training. No consistent theoretical implementation framework was reported. Collaboration, leadership, feedback and co‐design were strong drivers for staff buy‐in, engagement and success for implementation in mental health and acute settings. Transparency, replicability and generalisation require a detailed description of all elements of an intervention being implemented. Without adequate information, only assumptions can be drawn about the clinical governance and process of the implementation and training, and it is difficult to conclude when attempting to replicate the interventions. Reporting of #Safewards lacked descriptions of interventions, implementation, & outcomes. Collaboration, leadership & feedback were crucial for success. A standardised implementation method is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF