Search

Copyright of Filosofija, Sociologija is the property of Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filosofija, Sociologija is the property of Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Teorija in Praksa is the property of Teorija in Praksa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bohemistyka is the property of Instytut Filologii Slowianskiej Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

U ovom radu ćemo se vratiti u antički polis i sagledati kakva je bila situacija među građanima Atine koju je tada zahvatio talas demokratije i kako se ideja obrazovanja, posađena upravo tad, počela razvijati među njenim najznačajnijim nosiocima – sofistima. Proćićemo kroz sofistička učenja te utvrditi na koji način su sofisti uticali na izgradnju mladih Atinjana, te koja je njihova zasluga u dodjeljivanju baklje obrazovanja svakome ko je to sebi mogao priuštiti, bez obzira bio on dio aristokratskog društva ili ne. Naš rad će se usredsrediti na ukazivanje sofističkog uticaja u prelasku sa klasičnog ka demokratskom obrazovanju i isticanje za taj period novih i drugačijih nauka: retorike i političke nauke.

Copyright of Croatica et Slavica Iadertina is the property of University of Zadar, Department of Croatian & Slavic Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract. Over the past three decades, youth ministry and homiletic experts have offered several strategies to help youth ministers in their efforts to preach effectively to young people. However, the attempt has the potential to become a human-centered attempt. This paper attempted to see how the effort to preach to young people does not become a human-centered effort. Using the literature study method, the author answers the subject matter based on Paul's theology of preaching. The results of this study indicate that youth ministers must try to convey the Gospel of Christ clearly and must fully believe in the power of God, both in terms of delivery and in terms of the faith response of young people after listening to a sermon. Abstrak. Sejak tiga dekade lalu, banyak ahli pelayanan kaum muda dan homiletika yang menawarkan beberapa strategi untuk dapat menolong pelayan kaum muda dalam usahanya berkhotbah secara efektif kepada kaum muda. Namun, usaha tersebut berpotensi menjadi usaha yang berpusat pada manusia. Tulisan ini berupaya untuk melihat bagaimana agar usaha berkhotbah kepada kaum muda tidak menjadi sebuah usaha yang berpusat pada manusia (men-centered). Dengan menggunakan metode studi pustaka, penulis menjawab pokok permasalahan tersebut berdasarkan perspektif teologi khotbah Paulus. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa para pelayan kaum muda harus berusaha untuk menyampaikan Injil Kristus dengan jelas (being clear) dan harus percaya penuh pada kuasa Allah, baik dalam hal penyampaian maupun dalam hal respons iman kaum muda setelah mendengarkan sebuah khotbah.

Copyright of Teorija in Praksa is the property of Teorija in Praksa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The object of the study is the linguistic expression of comments posted under articles about the coronavirus on the social network Facebook. The aim of the study is to identify and analyze the linguistic features of comments, to capture recurring trends, and to discuss and evaluate it in a wider cultural, social and political context. The research material consists of comments posted under pandemic articles on Facebook accounts of main Lithuanian news portals (alfa.lt, delfi.lt, lrytas.lt, 15min). Chronologically the study covers the period of the first and second pandemic waves (from March 2020 to January 2021). The research uses descriptive analytical, stylistic and rhetorical analysis methods. The stylistic discourse analysis allows to document the means of style and reveal the tendencies of its use and previously unregistered functions. The rhetorical approach assesses the persuasive power of these devices: determines which elements of linguistic expression function as instruments of influence. Analysis of comments reveals public reactions to pandemic threat, the quarantine, and measures used to manage the situation. The spectrum of negative emotions in the majority of comments range from outpouring of resentment and intense anger at the government's decisions, to incitement to disobedience, which exacerbates the effects of the crisis. The comments are full of expressions belonging to the linguistic periphery: colloquial language elements, jargon, swear words, vulgarities, dysphemisms of everyday language as well as idioms, proverbs, proverbial quotations, allusions which imply the intertext. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Teorija in Praksa is the property of Teorija in Praksa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Govor is the property of Sekcija za Fonetiku Hrvatskog Filoloskog Drustva and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui retorika Presiden Joko Widodo dalam mempersuasi masyarakat Indonesia dalam rangka menghadapi pandemi Covid-19 dengan perspektif sosiolinguistik. Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif, bahwa sistematika penulisan ataupun metode penelitian kualitatif itu merupakan satu prosedur penelitian yang kata-kata atau tulisan orang yang kita jadikan obyek tersebut serta prilakunya dapat kita amati serta dideskripsikan, yang kemudian penelitian ini disebut dengan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kalimat ataupun kata-kata yang diucapkan oleh Presiden Joko Widodo semuanya mengandung politis, karena dari sepuluh pokok pikiran Jean Stilwell Peccei dan Jason Jones, hanya satu pokok pikiran saja yang tidak penulis temukan dalam kalimat maupun kata Presiden Joko Widodo yaitu pokok pikiran Paralelisme. Menurut peneliti itu merupakan hal yang lumrah bagi seorang Presiden, karena ia merupakan pemimpin politik tertinggi di Indonesia, karena setiap kata maupun kalimat yang ia lontarkan, akan sangat berpengaruh bagi pemerintahannya serta masyarakat umumnya.

Raksts veltīts dialoga jēdziena izpētei. Šāda izpēte nepieciešama, lai noskaidrotu, vai dialogs noris arī tiesas procesā. Rakstā secināts, ka dialoga jēdziens aptver trīs sarunu veidus un ka viens no tiem attiecināms arī uz tiesas procesu. Rakstā paustie secinājumi dod pamatu tālākiem pētījumiem, kuros tiesas process aplūkots no dialoga skatpunkta.

Copyright of Filosofija, Sociologija is the property of Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article discusses Kenneth Burke’s theory of the symbol, which considers the use of the sign as a specifically human activity associated with the formation of meaning. In Burke’s view, the symbol is a meaning-making device that can influence human action and thoughts, and therefore represents the key to understanding the nature of human communication. In this article, Burke’s ideas are compared to other sign-symbol theories — namely, the semiotics of Umberto Eco and Juri Lotman, Charles Sanders Peirce’s semeiotics, as well as Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms —, with analysis on the way each of these theorists defines the nature of the symbol and its conventional acceptation, principle of identification, and the characteristics of the symbolisation process itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retoričke vještine važne su za propovjednika jer se riječ Božja prenosi govorom. Od samih početaka kršćanske tradicije i svetoga Augustina ističe se kako elokvencija može pomoći propovjedniku da lakše dođe do svojih vjernika. U ovome radu analizira se i uspoređuje nekoliko izabranih propovijedi dviju najvećih kršćanskih vjeroispovijesti: katoličke i protestantske, kako bi se utvrdilo postoje li značajne retoričke razlike među propovjednicima. Primijenila se deskriptivna retorička analiza koja je uključila strukturu propovijedi, stil (izbor riječi i figura) te govorničku izvedbu (u-porabu neverbalnih i prozodijskih znakova tijekom propovijedi). Analiza je pokazala da među propovjednicima postoje određene razlike, ali su one u manjoj mjeri uvjetovane pripadnošću vjeroispovijesti, a više ovise o govorničkim vještinama svakoga pojedi-noga propovjednika.

Copyright of Language: Meaning & Form / Valoda: Nozime un Forma is the property of University of Latvia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ars & Humanitas is the property of Ars & Humanitas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of PISMO: Journal for Linguistics & Literary Studies / Zeitschrift für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft is the property of Bosnian Philological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Acta Illyrica / Godišnjak Udruženja BATHINVS ACTA ILLYRICA is the property of Association for the Study & Promotion of Illyrian Heritage, Ancient & Classical Civilizations and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Social Sciences & Humanities Studies / Društvene i Humanističke Studije (DHS) is the property of Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Tuzla and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Lituanistica is the property of Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Early Lithuanian Literature / Senoji Lietuvos literatūra is the property of Institute of Lithuanian Literature & Folklore and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article offers insights into the issue of the integrity of the First Letter to the Corinthians whose compositional unity has been challenged. On the one hand, we have supporters of the integrity and the compositional unity of the letter, and, on the other hand, we have supporters of various partition theories that view the letter as a compilation of many different original letters and emphasize its composite nature. The main goal of the article is to fortify the position of integrity and the notion that this letter is a unified literary composition that can be easily understood even without the divisive partition theories. The structure of this work discloses an additional intention to differentiate between the issue of authenticity, which deals exclusively with the person of the author and the issue of the integrity, which is concerned with the composition of the letter. The first part provides a brief examination of the authenticity and supplies both external and internal evidence in its favour. Whereas Paul's authorship has not been seriously doubted, the unity of the letter has been questioned by many scholars, even though most of the modern scholars support the integrity (unity) of the letter. The second part lays down the main points of various partition theories that view the letter as a compilation of many letters and of a middle ground hypothesis that wishes to take a neutral stand by suggesting different editions of the letter. However, the latter hypothesis appears to be only a variant of the composite theory since the end-proposition suggests that First Corinthians is a twofold composite letter. Each of the two groups of proposals receive significant responses by the supporters of the integrity who refute the scarce evidence by the former and offer further evidence in favour of the literal unity of the letter. The third and final part synthesizes and expands the claims of the letter's integrity and underlines its unified composition. In addition, it conveys the results of a literary-rhetorical analysis that provides a convincing rhetorical and epistolary structure of First Corinthians which demonstrates both thematic and rhetorical unity of the letter when regarded as a unified deliberative letter urging concord. The concluding synthesis emphasizes the fact that the middle ground hypothesis is still in the search of its supposed neutral position and that the partition theories still lack convincing and conclusive evidence against the integrity and unity of the letter. The multitude of often contradicting partition hypotheses and similar attempts to explain the letter as a compilation of many letters or as a product of different editions, represents the best evidence against their validity. This article emphasizes that the present letter that we have at our disposal is not a compilation of many letters, but a single non-composite document that Paul the Apostle himself originally wrote, even if it was written over an extended period. In the final instance, as long as the First Letter to the Corinthians remains intelligible as a whole and as long as it successfully transmits Paul's authentic message of the Gospel of Christ, there is no need for partition hypotheses, they become obsolete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A tanulmány célja, hogy bemutassa az amerikai és kínai politikai diskurzus különbségeit, megvizsgálja, hogy az amerikai és kínai politikusok miként szólnak a hallgatósághoz, milyen verbális és nonverbális eszközökkel élnek. Ennek vizsgálata az amerikai és a kínai politikai élet aktuálisan legjelentősebb eseményein elhangzott felszólalások – Donald Trump évértékelő beszédeinek (2017[1]–2020) és Xi Jinping 19. pártkongresszus előtt elmondott beszámolójának – elemzésével történik. A vezetők beszédeiben a következő retorikai eszközöket vizsgálom: 1) a múlt megjelenítése; 2) a jövő megjelenítése; 3) egység; 4) humor, irónia; 5) a kapcsolatteremtés kiszélesítése; 6) metakommunikációs eszközök.

Copyright of Two Homelands / Dve Domovini is the property of Scientific Research Centre of Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of ANAFORA is the property of Anafora and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Gerundium is the property of University of Debrecen and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Analizom mnogih retoričkih sredstava može se utvrditi kako je njihova učinkovitost utemeljena na suglasju više jezičnih razina, od fonološke do sintaktičke i da se upravo u njihovoj konstrukcijskoj simboličkoj strukturi, u smislu Langackera (1987), koja povezuje fonološku i značenjsku razinu može naći razlog njihovoj univerzalnosti i uporabnoj vrijednosti otpornoj na protok vremena. Jedna od retoričkih figura koja se analizom političkog i javnog diskursa općenito pojavila kao vrlo uspješna u svojoj retoričkoj funkciji uvjeravanja jest i apofaza ili pretericija (Škarić 2008) jer u formi negacije sadržaja zapravo privlači pozornost slušatelja i stvara koncept koji se, na prvi pogled, želi negirati. Apofastičke se strukture najčešće rabe u svrhu difamacije ili neizravne pohvale osoba ili pojava i oslanjaju se na izazivanje zanimanja slušatelja stvaranjem određenih očekivanja na temelju naočigled negiranog sadržaja. Korpusna analiza tipičnih apofastičkih konstrukcija u hrvatskom jeziku na primjerima iz političkog i medijskog diskursa u korpusu hrWaC pokazala je da se npr. zavisne objektne rečenice nakon glagola govorenja vrlo često rabe kao metoda uvođenja određenog pojma ili sadržaja koji se, površinski gledano, želi negirati suprotnim ili isključnim rečenicama. Tako se pretragom korpusa na slučajnom odabiru 100 rečenica s konstrukcijom Ne želim reći da…, ali/nego/no… utvrdilo da je čak 26 % primjera imalo tipičnu apofastičku funkciju uvođenja određenih tvrdnji zaobilaznim putem, tj. njihovom negacijom: Pritom ne želim reći da ona laže, nego samo to da imamo isključivo njezinu stranu priče. Polazeći od konstrukcijske naravi jezičnih izraza, u radu ćemo detaljno analizirati tipičnu sintaktičku strukturu apofastičkih konstrukcija s fokusom na pretericijske primjere i ulogu složenih rečenica u stvaranju željenih retoričkih i kognitivnih učinaka.

Copyright of Res Humanitariae is the property of Res Humanitariae and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Starting from the assumption of the significance of verbal omission in the artistic literature this paper is based on the study of interpretative function of ellipsis, allusion and irony in lyrical poetry. Relying on relevant theoretical sources (C. Brooks, K. Guillen, L. Hutcheon, A. William, P. de Man, S. Newstok, H. Van Tress etc.) the paper considers these concepts both as rhetorical figures and structural procedures. Ellipsis is here theoretically considered as intrinsic deficiency, allusion as extrinsic deficinecy, and irony as intrinsic-extrinsic deficiency of possible verbal content. Special attention is paid to (non)verbal context and it's semantic influence as a widespread discursive tool in modern literature and art. As explicative examples the autor took poems of several promminent modern Serbian poets (M. Nastasijevic, S. Raickovic, A. Ristovic). At the end of the paper, the author exposes the theoretical and metodological cosequences of his study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Sarajevo Social Science Review is the property of University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Political Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study aims to describe the use of language within President Jokowi's Game of Thrones speech in opening Annual Meetings IMF-World Bank Group. The research method is descriptive qualitative. Data and sources data in the form of speech transcript published in TribunJabar.id. The results of the analysis showed that overall using official language style, mixed codes, medium language, high pitch, anaphoric reps, mesodiplosis reps, long analogies, rhetorical questions, hyperbole, metaphors, fresh humor, antithesis, and climax in closing. In substance and packaging, President Jokowi's speech was so good. The speech was able to amaze the audience. The listeners of the speech will understand better if they also master the Game of Trones reference series. Further research on the language style of President Jokowi's speech in different forums will reveal different language styles according to the forum that was delivered. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan penggunaan gaya bahasa dalam pidato Presiden Jokowi Game of Thrones saat pembukaan Annual Meetings IMF-World Bank Group. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Data dan sumber data berupa transkrip pidato yang dimuat di Tribun Jabar.id. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan menggunakan gaya bahasa resmi, campur kode, bahasa menengah, nada suara tinggi, repetisi anafora, repetisi mesodiplosis, analogi yang panjang, pertanyaan retoris, hiperbol, metafora, humor-humor segar, antitesis, dan klimaks sebagai penutup. Secara substansi dan kemasan, pidato Presiden Jokowi begitu baik. Pidato tersebut mampu memukau hadirin. Bagi pendengar pidato tersebut akan lebih memahami apabila juga menguasai referensi serial Game of Trones. Penelitian lanjutan tentang gaya bahasa pidato Presiden Jokowi dalam forum yang berbeda akan mengungkapkan gaya bahasa yang berbeda sesuai dengan forum yang disampaikan.

Copyright of Res Humanitariae is the property of Res Humanitariae and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filozofija i Drustvo is the property of University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy & Social Theory and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Culture & Society: Journal of Social Research / Kultūra ir Visuomenė: Socialinių Tyrimų Žurnalas is the property of Vytautas Magnus University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ars & Humanitas is the property of Ars & Humanitas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Early Lithuanian Literature / Senoji Lietuvos literatūra is the property of Institute of Lithuanian Literature & Folklore and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik gaya bahasa kritikan Rizal Ramli. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode observasi dan dokumentasi dengan teknik catat. Sumber data berupa dokumen, yaitu tuturan kritikan Rizal Ramli yang dimuat dalam media cetak atau pun media daring. Metode analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dengan teknik interpretatif. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori wacana kritis. Hasil dan pembahasan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik gaya bahasa kritikan Rizal Ramli adalah gaya bahasa sederhana, metafora, personifikasi, ironi, dan sarkasme. Gaya bahasa sederhana dan berbagai gaya bahasa kiasan kritikan Rizal Ramli tersebut mendapat apresiasi dari masyarakat. Meskipun tegas dan cenderung ceplas-ceplos, kritikan Rizal Ramli masih dalam batas kesantunan. Akan tetapi, dalam konteks pemerintahan hal itu menimbulkan persepsi bahwa sinergi antarmenteri di kabinet tidak berjalan dengan baik. Dari hasil penelitian itu disimpulkan bahwa karakteristik gaya bahasa Rizal Ramli dapat memengaruhi keputusan Presiden Jokowi untuk menggantinya dari jabatan Menko Maritim dan Sumber Daya.

Tulisan ini mendeskripsikan jenis-jenis implikatur dan retorika pemakaian bahasa pada papan iklan. Kajian ini membahas perspektif pemakaian bahasa dan tindak tutur pada papan iklan. Bahasa pada papan iklan disampaikan dengan teknik persuasif. Persuasi yang muncul dalam implikatur papan iklan: (a) memuji keunggulan produk, (b) memerintah menggunakan produk secara langsung, dan (c) menegaskan nama produk. Implikatur ini muncul akibat simpulan yang didasari latar belakang pengetahuan tentang produk atau barang yang diiklankan. Dari segi penyampaiannya, bahasa papan iklan menggunakan kaidah retorika: (a) iklan dengan kaidah pernyataan netral disertai penilaian, (b) iklan dengan kaidah perkaitan konsep, (c) iklan dengan kategori keyakinan, (d) iklan dengan kaidah larangan, dan (e) iklan dengan kaidah suruhan.

Članak analizira Pavlovu poslanicu Galaćanima po principima retoričkog kriticizma. Ovakav pristup biblijskim tekstovima postao je prominentan u posljednjih četrdesetak godina. Rani zagovornici ove metode djelovali su pod pretpostavkom da je Pavao pisao u skladu s tada poznatim retoričkim priručnicima. U tom smislu, uvod članka propituje odnos Pavlovih poslanica i antičke retorike i literarnog svijeta. Također istražuje mogućnost prihvaćanja šireg koncepta retorike kojega pruža moderno proučavanje te discipline. Uvod članka zaključuju pitanje odnosa retorike i epistolografije, kao i pitanje raspodjele retoričkog čina i njegove primjene na Poslanicu Galaćanima. Zatim započinje analiza glavnih retoričkih elemenata Poslanice Galaćanima, koja će zbog ograničenosti prostora biti nastavljena u sljedećem članku.

This paper deals with the oxymoron — a rhetoric device which connects two words with contradictory or even opposite meanings. In modern French literature, the oxymoron is the most favorite procédé of Maurice Blanchot in whose works it expresses some paradoxes, not only of aesthetical, but also of ontological nature. We suggest that the omnipresent oxymoronic structures determine Blanchot’s conception of the human subject, the language and the writing. This trope is first approached through a triple prism: 1) a psychoanalytical one, where we relate the oxymoron to Freud’s article “The Antithetical Meaning of Primal Words” (1910) for interpreting the oxymoron as one of the archaic principles of the unconsciousness. 2) In a philosophical perspective, the oxymoron can be viewed, in proximity with the Kojève’s anthropological reading of Hegel’s dialectic, as a pattern of the ontological structure of the Dasein defined by the coexistence of the being and the nothingness. 3) Finally, we adopt the point a view of the paraconsistent, non-Aristotelian (postAristotelian) logic, which permits us to show the ramification of this figure throughout all textual levels of Blanchot’s fictional and theoretical works. The conclusion points out the analogy between the dialectic of the language and that of the human.