Search

PURPOSE: To report our experience of performing immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in patients with visually significant cataracts and reduced preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). METHODS: Data of patients who underwent ISBCS for visually significant cataracts and had preoperative CDVA ≤20/32 (≤0.2 logMAR) in each eye were retrospectively reviewed. Refractive and visual outcomes were evaluated for the last available postoperative visit. Intraoperative and serious postoperative adverse events occurring within the first three months of surgery were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1335 patients (2670 eyes) were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 71.9 ± 9.5 years. On the last visit, 50.2% and 89.1% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 (0.0 logMAR) and ≥20/32 (0.2 logMAR), respectively. Of all eyes, 83.8% were within ±0.50D, and 96.4% were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia. Ten patients had postoperative bilateral ametropia of more than 1.00D in each eye, but eight of them still achieved binocular UDVA ≥20/40. Intraoperative events occurred in 14 eyes of 13 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.524% or 1 in 191 eyes). A total of 86 postoperative adverse events occurred in 80 eyes of 53 patients (per-eye incidence 2.996% or 1 in 33 eyes), of which cystoid macular edema was the most common. Only three eyes had CDVA reduced by more than two Snellen lines compared to preoperative CDVA, two of which were not related to cataract surgery. There was no patient with bilateral CDVA loss. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients with visually significant cataracts, ISBCS resulted in good refractive predictability and a low incidence of serious adverse events.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to report the visual and refractive outcomes of nanophthalmic eyes undergoing phacoemulsification at a tertiary cataract center. Methods: This is a prospective consecutive case series. Patients with an axial length of ≤20.5 mm who underwent phacoemulsification at a tertiary cataract center in Hong Kong were included. Eyes undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction or with a previous history of intraocular surgery including trabeculectomy were excluded. The outcome measures were the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and refractive status at four months post-operation. Different intraocular lens formulas were used to compare the refractive outcomes. Results: Out of 22,847 cataract surgeries performed from May 2011 to March 2020, 14 eyes (0.06%) of 10 patients had axial lengths of ≤20.5 mm and underwent phacoemulsification. The mean axial length was 20.13 ± 0.44 mm. Out of these fourteen eyes, three (21%) had postoperative myopic shift with spherical equivalent refraction of more than or equal to 1D compared to the original target. Eleven eyes (79%) had postoperative refraction within 0.5D compared to the original target. Nine out of fourteen eyes (64%) had improvements in postoperative vision. There were no intraoperative complications. When comparing the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis and Hill-RBF 2.0 formulas, there was no significant difference in the absolute errors between the five formulas (p = 0.072). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the mean absolute errors between the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis and Hill-RBF 2.0 formulas. Myopic shift was not uncommon, and more studies on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for short eyes are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of the biometry device (IOL Master 500 or IOL Master 700), patient age, time elapsed between biometry and surgery, gender, and insurance status, as well as biometric parameters (anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal curvature), on postoperative refractive outcomes, specifically the deviation from target refraction. Results: The choice of the IOL Master device did not result in a statistically significant difference between the two devices (p = 0.205). Age (p = 0.006) and gender (p = 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of refractive outcomes, with older patients and males experiencing slightly more hyperopic outcomes compared to younger patients and females, respectively. The time elapsed between biometry and surgery and insurance status did not significantly influence the refractive outcomes. Conclusions: Our study, supported by a large cohort and a diverse group of patients representing typical anatomical variants seen in cataract surgery, supports the thesis that the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 can be regarded as equivalent and effective for biometry in cataract surgery. The differences between the devices were negligible. Therefore, switching between the devices is safe for bilateral patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose To assess rotational stability and refractive outcomes of a new toric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design Single-center, prospective, interventional clinical trial. Methods A total of 130 eyes of 82 patients with age-related cataract and total corneal astigmatism of greater than 1.0 diopters (D) received a hydrophobic acrylic toric IOL Clareon CNW0T3-9. Baseline measurement for rotational stability evaluation was performed at the end of surgery (EOS), with the patient still supine on the operating table, using non-movable vessels as reference landmarks. Postoperative retroillumination pictures were taken at 1 h, 1 week, 1 month and 4–6 months postoperatively. Subjective manifest refraction was assessed at the 6 months follow-up visit. Results Final results were obtained in 126 eyes of 80 patients. Mean absolute rotation from EOS to 6 months was 1.33 ± 2.00 [0.01, 19.80] degrees. Rotational stability values from EOS to 1 h, 1 h to 1 week, 1 week to 1 month and 1 month to 6 months were 0.86 ± 0.82 [0.00, 3.90], 1.06 ± 1.94 [0.00, 19.45], 0.47 ± 0.42 [0.00, 2.03] and 0.38 ± 0.40 [0.00, 2.56] degrees. Mean preoperative corneal astigmatism was 1.78 ± 0.83 [1.00, 4.76] D which changed to a mean postoperative refractive astigmatism of 0.33 ± 0.27 [0.00, 1.25] D at 6 months. Conclusion The Clareon toric IOL presented very good rotational stability with a mean absolute rotation below 1.4° from EOS to 6 months. Only two IOLs rotated more than 5° with none of them requiring repositioning surgery. Refractive outcomes were satisfying with a mean residual refractive astigmatism below 0.50 D. Trial registration Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03803852 ; on May 17, 2022.

Assess refractive outcomes following uveitic cataract surgery and identify factors associated with deviations from the target refractive goal. A multicenter retrospective chart review was performed for 216 subjects with uveitis undergoing cataract surgery. Prediction error was calculated and tested for association with demographic and clinical characteristics using single variable and multiple regression analysis. 39.8% of eyes deviated from the intended refractive target by at least 0.5 diopters (D). The mean prediction error was 0.56 ± 0.67 D. Younger age (p = 0.042), preoperative inflammatory corneal findings (keratic precipitates and/or band keratopathy) (p = 0.0004), and poorer postoperative visual acuity (p = 0.0054) were associated with a deviation from the intended refractive target by at least 1 D. A higher percentage of eyes undergoing uveitic cataract surgery deviated from the intended refractive target when compared to reported refractive outcomes in normal subjects. Younger age, preoperative inflammatory corneal sequelae, and poorer postoperative visual acuity were associated with this outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dasi Raju,1 Stephen J Hannan,1 Mirna Belovari,1 Noelle C Hannan,1 Colin W Berry,1 Jan A Venter,1 David Teenan,1 Steven C Schallhorn,2,3 Julie M Schallhorn2,4 1Optical Express, Glasgow, UK; 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; 3Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USA; 4F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Dasi Raju, Clinical Services Department, Optical Express, 200 Street Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5SG, UK, Email DasiRaju@opticalexpress.comPurpose: To report our experience of performing immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in patients with visually significant cataracts and reduced preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).Methods: Data of patients who underwent ISBCS for visually significant cataracts and had preoperative CDVA ≤ 20/32 (≤ 0.2 logMAR) in each eye were retrospectively reviewed. Refractive and visual outcomes were evaluated for the last available postoperative visit. Intraoperative and serious postoperative adverse events occurring within the first three months of surgery were reviewed.Results: A total of 1335 patients (2670 eyes) were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 71.9 ± 9.5 years. On the last visit, 50.2% and 89.1% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/20 (0.0 logMAR) and ≥ 20/32 (0.2 logMAR), respectively. Of all eyes, 83.8% were within ± 0.50D, and 96.4% were within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia. Ten patients had postoperative bilateral ametropia of more than 1.00D in each eye, but eight of them still achieved binocular UDVA ≥ 20/40. Intraoperative events occurred in 14 eyes of 13 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.524% or 1 in 191 eyes). A total of 86 postoperative adverse events occurred in 80 eyes of 53 patients (per-eye incidence 2.996% or 1 in 33 eyes), of which cystoid macular edema was the most common. Only three eyes had CDVA reduced by more than two Snellen lines compared to preoperative CDVA, two of which were not related to cataract surgery. There was no patient with bilateral CDVA loss.Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with visually significant cataracts, ISBCS resulted in good refractive predictability and a low incidence of serious adverse events.Keywords: immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery, visual outcomes, refractive outcomes, adverse events

Nitya Devireddy, Rucha Borkhetaria, Nathan Cannon, Esther Bowie, Seth M Pantanelli Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USACorrespondence: Seth M Pantanelli, Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, HU19, Hershey, PA, 17033-0850, USA, Tel +1 717-531-5690, Fax +1 717-531-5009, Email spantanelli@pennstatehealth.psu.eduPurpose: To investigate refractive, visual, and safety outcomes of cataract surgery performed after scleral buckling (SB) for retinal detachment (RD).Patients and methods: A chart review at an academic medical center identified eyes with history of SB followed by subsequent cataract extraction between 2010 and 2022. Eyes with less than 3 weeks follow-up, silicone oil at time of biometry measurement, previous cornea surgery, or co-existing pathology impacting refractive outcomes were excluded. Predicted postoperative spherical equivalents (SE) were calculated with the Barrett Universal II (BU2), Kane, and SRK/T formulas for the implanted intraocular lens (IOL), and complications occurring within 1 year of surgery were abstracted.Results: Sixty eyes of 60 patients met criteria for inclusion, and 40 (66.7%) had postoperative refraction recorded. Absolute prediction errors were 0.49, 0.45, and 0.52D with BU2, Kane, and SRK/T, respectively. Actual postoperative refraction was within 0.5 and 1.0 D of predicted in 26 (65.0%) and 36 (90.0%) using BU2, 23 (58%) and 37 (93%) using Kane, and 21 (52.5%) and 36 (90.0%) using SRK/T. In eyes with macula-on RD, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of logMAR 0.301 (≈20/40) and logMAR 0.544 (≈20/70) or better was achieved in 12 (75.0%) and 15 (93.8%) of eyes. For macula-off RD eyes, these proportions were 19 (63.3%) and 24 (80.0%), respectively. Posterior capsular opacification requiring Nd: YAG capsulotomy was the most frequent complication in 30 (56.7%) eyes.Conclusion: Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery following SB may be modestly reduced, even when using modern formulas. Nevertheless, cataract surgery in this population results in favorable visual outcomes.Plain Language Summary: The retina is the part of the eye that is responsible for converting incoming light into a signal that the brain can interpret. A retinal detachment is an emergent condition in which the retina is torn away from its normal position. Scleral buckling is one method of surgically reattaching the retina. Although quite successful, scleral buckling can cause changes to the shape of the eye, and also increases the risk of opacification of the natural lens of the eye, otherwise known as a cataract. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with prior scleral buckle surgery. The results show that despite advancements in methods of measuring the shape of the eye, calculating the appropriately powered IOL to implant, and surgical technique, cataract surgery in eyes with prior scleral buckling may result in poorer outcomes compared to eyes with no history of scleral buckling.Keywords: Barrett Universal II, cataract surgery, refractive outcomes, SRK/T, scleral buckle, retinal detachment

Abstract Purpose To evaluate short-term visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract patients with phacoemulsification (PHACO) and femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). Setting Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital, China. Design A retrospective, observational study. Methods Patients who underwent cataract surgery combined with Acrysoft IQ PanOptix trifocal IOL implantation were enrolled and divided into three groups: PHACO group, LAstig-FLACS group (astigmatism less then 1D) and HAstig-FLACS group (astigmatism more than 1D). Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity of uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), near visual (UNVA), defocus curve, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were evaluated in 1 months postoperatively and wavefront aberrations were evaluated in 6 months. Results 101 eyes of 60 patients were included with 31 eyes in PHACO group, 45 eyes in LAstig-FLACS group and 25 eyes in HAstig-FLACS group. Significant difference was found of internal Strehl Ratio (SR) between PHACO and LAstig-FLACS group (P = 0.026). In PHACO group, 79.31%, 86.21%, 72.41% of eyes gain visual acuity LogMAR 0.1 or more in UDVA, UIVA and UNVA, while 83.72%, 93.02%, 93.02% of those in LAstig-FLACS group and 92.00%, 84.00%, 76.00% in HAstig-FLACS group. Conclusions Panoptix diffractive trifocal IOL provides satisfied visual outcome in no matter FLACS or PHACO. Besides, trifocal IOL implantation via FLACS can provide a better accumulative visual acuity outcome at all distance than PHACO in 1 month. Femtosecond laser assisted limbal relaxing incisions (FLLRIs) is an excellent way to reduce a patient’s corneal astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare refractive, visual, and patient-reported outcomes associated with a 1st generation wavefront-guided (WFG) treatment with those associated with a 3rd generation WFG treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia/myopic astigmatism. Two random stratified samples of patients who underwent either 1stgeneration (WaveScan, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) or 3rd generation (iDesign 2.0, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) treatment matched on preoperative refraction were compared (4290 eyes of 2145 patients in each group). One-month postoperative visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Refractive and monocular visual acuity analyses were performed using one random eye of each patient. RESULTS: The percentage of eyes achieving 20/20 or better uncorrected vision was 91.3% (1958/2145) in the 1st generation group and 95.9% (2056/2145) in the 3rd generation group (p

Purpose: To evaluate short-term visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract patients with phacoemulsification (PHACO) and femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital, China. Design: A retrospective, observational study. Methods: Patients who underwent cataract surgery combined with Acrysoft IQ PanOptix trifocal IOL implantation were enrolled and divided into three groups: PHACO group, LAstig-FLACS group (astigmatism less then 1D) and HAstig-FLACS group (astigmatism more than 1D). Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity of uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), near visual (UNVA), defocus curve, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were evaluated in 1 months postoperatively and wavefront aberrations were evaluated in 6 months. Results: 101 eyes of 60 patients were included with 31 eyes in PHACO group, 45 eyes in LAstig-FLACS group and 25 eyes in HAstig-FLACS group. Significant difference was found of internal Strehl Ratio (SR) between PHACO and LAstig-FLACS group (P = 0.026). In PHACO group, 79.31%, 86.21%, 72.41% of eyes gain visual acuity LogMAR 0.1 or more in UDVA, UIVA and UNVA, while 83.72%, 93.02%, 93.02% of those in LAstig-FLACS group and 92.00%, 84.00%, 76.00% in HAstig-FLACS group. Conclusions: Panoptix diffractive trifocal IOL provides satisfied visual outcome in no matter FLACS or PHACO. Besides, trifocal IOL implantation via FLACS can provide a better accumulative visual acuity outcome at all distance than PHACO in 1 month. Femtosecond laser assisted limbal relaxing incisions (FLLRIs) is an excellent way to reduce a patient's corneal astigmatism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare axial length (AL) and the refractive outcome after phacoemulsification surgery from 2014 to 2019 at Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Terengganu, Malaysia. Method: This was a retrospective record review of all cataract patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent uneventful superior wound phacoemulsification with nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2019. Using optical biometry or immersion technique, the preoperative AL determined solely via the Sanders, Retzlaff and Kraff 2 (SRK2) formula was selected. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at 6 weeks-12 weeks was retrieved. Using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0, the mean differences between targeted and actual postoperative SE were analysed based on the AL. Result: In this study, 490 eyes of 472 patients aged 25 years old--88 years old (mean age 65.72 years old [SD 8.83]) were involved. There were 162 eyes (33%) in Group A (< 23 mm), 189 eyes (39%) in Group B (23.01 mm-24.0 mm) and 139 eyes (28%) in Group C (> 24.0 mm). The mean AL was 23.63 mm (SD 1.19). The mean differences between the targeted and actual postoperative SE were: -0.09 D (SD 0.60) in Group A, -0.07 D (SD 0.53) in Group B and -0.16 D (SD 0.52) in Group C. No significant difference was found between these groups (P = 0.327). Conclusion There was no significant difference in the refractive outcome using the SRK2 formula in different ALs after phacoemulsification surgery. Hence, there is no reason to modify or adjust the targeted SE based on AL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study reports the outcomes of a secondary IOL implantation technique in patients that suffered from rhegmatogenous retinal detachment combined with a cataract, which included reopening the capsular bag, enabling secondary intracapsular intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. We included consecutive cases with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade, and subsequent secondary IOL implantation during silicone oil removal between September 2019 and June 2022. Demographics, pre- and postoperative clinical data, and complications were collected. Visual and refractive outcomes and IOL position were evaluated. Thirty eyes were included and followed up for a mean of 24.2 ± 5.06 months. Compared with the preoperative values, no significant changes were observed in the intraocular pressure (p = 0.170) and endothelial cell density (p = 0.336); however, the best-corrected visual acuity (Snellen: 20/83 vs. 20/38; logMAR: 0.66 ± 0.23 vs. 0.37 ± 0.32; p < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (p < 0.001) improved significantly. The mean prediction error (ME) was −0.45 ± 0.68 D (−1.9–0.54 D), and the mean absolute prediction error (MAE) was 0.62 ± 0.52 D (0.01–1.9 D). The macula-on subgroup demonstrated significantly better refractive outcomes than the macula-off subgroup (ME, p = 0.046; MAE, p = 0.008). The IOL was well positioned, with a mean horizontal and vertical tilt and decentration of 0.53 ± 0.49° and 0.21 ± 0.16 mm, and 0.54 ± 0.45° and 0.22 ± 0.16 mm, respectively. Secondary intracapsular IOL implantation provided a good and stable IOL position and satisfactory refractive outcomes, and is a feasible treatment option for patients with RRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stephen J Hannan,1 David Teenan,1 Jan A Venter,1 Keith A Hettinger,1 Colin W Berry,1 Noelle C Hannan,1 Huba J Kiss,1 Dasi Raju,1 Julie M Schallhorn2,3 1Optical Express, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 2University of California, San Francisco, Department of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CA, USA; 3F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Stephen J Hannan, Clinical Services Department, Optical Express, 200 St Vincent St, Glasgow, G2 5SG, United Kingdom, Tel +44 7740592389, Email StephenHannan@opticalexpress.comPurpose: To compare refractive, visual, and patient-reported outcomes associated with a 1st generation wavefront-guided (WFG) treatment with those associated with a 3rd generation WFG treatment.Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia/myopic astigmatism. Two random stratified samples of patients who underwent either 1stgeneration (WaveScan, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) or 3rd generation (iDesign 2.0, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) treatment matched on preoperative refraction were compared (4290 eyes of 2145 patients in each group). One-month postoperative visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Refractive and monocular visual acuity analyses were performed using one random eye of each patient.Results: The percentage of eyes achieving 20/20 or better uncorrected vision was 91.3% (1958/2145) in the 1st generation group and 95.9% (2056/2145) in the 3rd generation group (p< 0.01). Binocularly, the percentage of patients with 20/20 or better UDVA was 97.0% (2080/2145) and 99.2% (2127/2145) in the 1st and 3rd generation groups, respectively (p< 0.01). The mean postoperative MSE was − 0.01 ± 0.33 D in the 1st generation group and +0.19 ± 0.33 D in the 3rd generation group (p< 0.01). Postoperative refractive astigmatism had a mean value of − 0.20 ± 0.26 D and − 0.18 ± 0.24 D in the 1st and 3rd generation groups, respectively (p< 0.01). The mean correction index of refractive astigmatism was 1.09 ± 0.53 in the 1st generation group and 1.02 ± 0.38 in the 3rd generation group, p< 0.01. The overall percentage of patients satisfied with vision was 92.8% (1991/2145 patients) in the 1st generation group and 97.3% (2087/2145 patients) in the 3rd generation group (p< 0.01).Conclusion: For the majority of postoperative variables, there were significant differences between 1st and 3rd generation treatments. The 3rd generation treatments had better visual acuity outcomes and higher patient satisfaction.Keywords: wavefront-guided LASIK, myopia, aberrometer, refractive outcomes, patient-reported outcomes

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial ocular surface disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis with associated ocular symptoms, like dryness, foreign body sensation, and inflammation. Numerous reports confirm an increase in dry eye symptoms after cataract surgery. DED also significantly disturbs preoperative biometric measurements, mainly by changes in keratometry measurements. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of DED on biometric measurements before cataract surgery and postoperative refractive errors. PubMed database was searched for [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background: To evaluate the influence of preoperative optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction. Methods: In this retrospective clinical study, 581 eyes from 316 patients underwent SMILE were selected, including 117 eyes in the small optical zone group (range from 6.0 to 6.4 mm) and 464 eyes in the large optical zone group (range from 6.5 to 6.8 mm). The measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical, and cylinder were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed with age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry and preoperative spherical equivalent between two different groups. The influence of optical zones on postoperative refractive outcomes were evaluated using univariate regression analysis. Results: In total, 78 pairs of eyes were selected by PSM (match ratio 1:1). There were no differences in the age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry or preoperative spherical equivalent between the small and large optical zone groups. However, the difference of postoperative spherical equivalent was significantly between groups. Patients with larger optical zones had a trend towards less undercorrection (P = 0.018). Univariate linear regression model analysis found that each millimeter larger optical zone resulted in 8.13% or 0.39D less undercorrection (P

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive outcomes of scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus in post-traumatic eyes using SRK/T formula. Methods: This single-center retrospective case series included 35 eyes from 35 post-traumatic patients undergoing scleral-suture of ErgomaX IOLs by a single experienced surgeon. Preoperative predicted refraction, procedure-related complications, and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at least 1 month after surgery were recorded. The prediction error (PE) was calculated as the difference between the postoperative SE and preoperative predicted refraction. Results: Of the 35 post-traumatic patients, 28 patients were aphakia without capsular support, and 7 patients were traumatic lens dislocation or subluxation. The mean age at surgery was 56.03 ± 14.56 years and 28 patients were men (80%). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and postoperative astigmatism were − 1.23 ± 0.82 D and 1.57 ± 1.14 D, respectively. The mean prediction error (ME) of SRK/T formula was − 0.17 D. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.48D. The prediction accuracy was 60.0% for refractive errors of ± 0.50 D and 85.7% for refractive errors of ± 1.00D. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that IOL power has positive correlation with PE. Conclusion: Assumption of in-the-bag IOL position when calculating IOL (52501TY, ErgomaX) power for standardizing scleral-sutured IOL 2 mm posterior to the limbus demonstrates acceptable refractive outcomes. The accuracy of IOL power calculation using the SRK/T formula for eyes needing low IOL power or high IOL power may be affected by the uncertain position of postoperative IOL and further studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the refractive results between sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOLs) (Carlevale, Soleko) and suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOLs (Sensar AR40, Johnson & Johnson) for secondary implantation in patients with IOL dislocation or aphakia. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study on 28 patients (28 eyes) with sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale IOL and 25 patients (25 eyes) with suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOL. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) evaluation, refractive measures and IOL tilt evaluation with anterior segment optical coherence tomography were conducted at one, three, six and twelve months after surgery. Point Spread Function (PSF) was measured using a total ocular aberrometer. Results: BCVA in both groups improved since the postoperative visit at 1 month and reached a stable value at 3 months At month 12, mean BCVA was 0.23 logMAR in group one and 0.32 logMAR in group two. Mean IOL tilt angle at 12 months was 2.76° ± 1.87 in group one and 2.51° ± 1.80 in group two. PSF at 12 months was 0.18 ± 0.09 in group one and 0.15 ± 0.05 in group two. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) for all comparisons. The post-operative complications were similar within the two groups. Conclusions: Our results show that secondary IOL implantation has similar visual and surgical outcomes when a sutureless Carlevale lens scleral fixation and a suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOL are used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the refractive outcomes of combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy compared to cataract surgery alone. Methods: This retrospective chart review study included two groups: (1) combined surgery in 103 eyes (101 patients) who underwent cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) placement by a single cataract surgeon and vitrectomy by a single vitreoretinal surgeon at the same surgical setting; (2) cataract surgery alone by the same surgeon in 107 eyes (84 patients). Refractive outcomes and complications between the combined and cataract surgery alone group were compared. The predicted refractive error was compared to postoperative refractive outcomes in both groups, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), intraoperative or postoperative complications of either cataract surgery or vitrectomy, and cystoid macular edema. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between predicted and actual postoperative refractive outcomes between the combined and cataract surgery alone groups (within ±0.5 diopters [D], p = 0.099; within ±1.0 D, p = 0.721). There was no difference in SIA refractive outcomes between the two groups (p = 0.509). The use of intraoperative gas for retina tamponade did not significantly affect postoperative refractive outcomes. Both cataract surgery and vitrectomy were successfully performed without unexpected complications from either procedure affecting the other. Discussion/Conclusion: Combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy allows excellent refractive outcomes equal to cataract surgery alone, allowing each procedure to be performed independently by separate anterior and posterior segment surgeons. Combined procedures can be performed in eyes with a variety of retinal indications and can include fluid-gas exchange with minimal risk of PCIOL malposition or change in targeted refraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study compares the visual and refractive performance of the TECNIS Synergy (DFR00V-DFW150-225-300-375) multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and the AcrySof IQ PanOptix (TFAT00-30-40-50-60) multifocal IOL. Patients who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received either a multifocal Synergy or PanOptix IOL were included. Monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), near (UNVA), and corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuities were assessed at three and six months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures of photic phenomena were also assessed. A total of 140 patients (224 eyes) were included in this study, with 69 patients (105 eyes) in the Synergy group and 71 patients (119 eyes) in the PanOptix group. There were no statistically significant differences in UIVA or CDVA measurements across all time points. When assessing UDVA, at three months postoperatively, there were more eyes in the PanOptix group with vision better than 20/40 (p = 0.04). At three and six months postoperatively, the average UNVA was superior in the Synergy group (p = 0.01, 0.002). While the Synergy group reported more night vision disturbances at one and three months (p = 0.01, 0.03), the PanOptix group had more night vision disturbances at six months (p = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, the AcrySof IQ PanOptix multifocal IOL demonstrated better UDVA and UIVA sooner postoperatively than the TECNIS Synergy multifocal IOL. The Synergy IOL provided statistically better UNVA compared to the PanOptix IOL at three and six months postoperatively. Synergy patients reported more early photic phenomena than PanOptix patients, which later diminished. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to summarize the results related to ocular biometry performed using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). A literature search was conducted to search articles reporting the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent examinations with commercially available SS-OCT machines. The available data were thoroughly analyzed, with a particular focus on all the biometric factors used to calculate the power of intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted during cataract surgery. The agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of several parameters among different devices were examined. The variations found for parameters obtained from agreement testing were evaluated in order to promote the interchangeability of devices. Swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers usually produce highly repeatable and reproducible results. The excellent results obtained led us to the conclusion that optical biometers based on SS-OCT technology will probably take the lead in ocular biometry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To assess the refractive outcomes in eyes with severe Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after treatment with the frequency-doubled neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd-YAG) laser 532 nm (green laser) at 1–2 years of age and compare with eyes that underwent spontaneous regression of ROP and to identify the risk factors associated with the refractive outcomes in laser-treated eyes with severe ROP. METHODOLOGY: Infants who underwent laser treatment with green laser were enrolled in Group 1 and those who had spontaneous regression of ROP were enrolled in Group 2. All these children underwent a visual assessment, refraction using 1% cyclopentolate eye drops and indirect ophthalmoscopy at 1–2 years of age. Data regarding the gestational age, sex, birth weight, inborn (born in our institution) or outborn (born outside and referred to us), stage and zone of ROP and laser spots given were obtained from the treatment records. Data were analyzed using SSPS 19.0 software for Windows (SSPS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). RESULTS: A total of 102 infants were enrolled, 51 in each group. Visual acuity ranged from 0.25–1 cycles per cm in both groups. Spherical equivalent (SE) ranged from − 8.25 D to + 5.50 D in Group 1 and −1.00D to +4.00D in Group 2. Group 1 had an incidence of 23.5% Myopia and 33.4% Astigmatism which was significantly more than Group 2. The linear regression model predicted a decrease in the SE by 0.658D if the number of laser spots increased by 1000 (P < 0.001). No other risk factors (gestational age/birth weight) were found to have a significant association with refractive errors in the lasered ROP group. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with laser-treated severe ROP are frequently associated with myopia and astigmatism when compared to spontaneously regressed ROP. The number of laser spots delivered has a direct association with the amount of refractive error.

Background: To evaluate the influence of preoperative optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction.Methods: In this retrospective clinical study, 581 eyes from 316 patients underwent SMILE were selected, including 117 eyes in the small optical zone group (range from 6.0 to 6.4 mm) and 464 eyes in the large optical zone group (range from 6.5 to 6.8 mm). The measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical, and cylinder were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed with age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry and preoperative spherical equivalent between two different groups. The influence of optical zones on postoperative refractive outcomes were evaluated using univariate regression analysis.Results: In total, 78 pairs of eyes were selected by PSM (match ratio 1:1). There were no differences in the age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry or preoperative spherical equivalent between the small and large optical zone groups. However, the difference of postoperative spherical equivalent was significantly between groups. Patients with larger optical zones had a trend towards less undercorrection (P = 0.018). Univariate linear regression model analysis found that each millimeter larger optical zone resulted in 8.13% or 0.39D less undercorrection (P < 0.001). The dependency between the optical zones and postoperative spherical equivalent was significant in the higher preoperative myopia group (r = 0.281, P < 0.001), but not significant in the lower myopia group (r = 0.028, P = 0.702).Conclusion: The diameter of optical zones would affect postoperative refractive outcomes in small incision lenticule extraction. This study indicated that larger optical zones induced less undercorrection, especially in patients with high myopia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To assess the refractive outcomes in eyes with severe Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after treatment with the frequency-doubled neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd-YAG) laser 532 nm (green laser) at 1-2 years of age and compare with eyes that underwent spontaneous regression of ROP and to identify the risk factors associated with the refractive outcomes in laser-treated eyes with severe ROP. METHODOLOGY: Infants who underwent laser treatment with green laser were enrolled in Group 1 and those who had spontaneous regression of ROP were enrolled in Group 2. All these children underwent a visual assessment, refraction using 1% cyclopentolate eye drops and indirect ophthalmoscopy at 1-2 years of age. Data regarding the gestational age, sex, birth weight, inborn (born in our institution) or outborn (born outside and referred to us), stage and zone of ROP and laser spots given were obtained from the treatment records. Data were analyzed using SSPS 19.0 software for Windows (SSPS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). RESULTS: A total of 102 infants were enrolled, 51 in each group. Visual acuity ranged from 0.25-1 cycles per cm in both groups. Spherical equivalent (SE) ranged from - 8.25 D to + 5.50 D in Group 1 and -1.00D to +4.00D in Group 2. Group 1 had an incidence of 23.5% Myopia and 33.4% Astigmatism which was significantly more than Group 2. The linear regression model predicted a decrease in the SE by 0.658D if the number of laser spots increased by 1000 (P < 0.001). No other risk factors (gestational age/birth weight) were found to have a significant association with refractive errors in the lasered ROP group. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with laser-treated severe ROP are frequently associated with myopia and astigmatism when compared to spontaneously regressed ROP. The number of laser spots delivered has a direct association with the amount of refractive error. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the refractive outcomes and the complications of implantation surgery by the Carlevale IOL to the Artisan iris-claw IOL., Methods: Retrospective comparative study of consecutive surgical cases between 2019 and 2021 in our tertiary centre in Paris, France., Results: We included 142 eyes in the Artisan group and 63 in the Carlevale group. Post-operative astigmatism at one month was 2.3 ± 1.6 D in the Carlevale group, 3.3 ± 2.5 D in the Artisan group with corneal incisions, and 1.8 ± 1.4 D in the Artisan group with scleral incisions ( p  = 0.015). Surgery duration was higher ( p  = 0.007) with the Carlevale IOL (70.8 ± 31.3 min) than with the Artisan IOL (58.3 ± 23.2 min). The complication rates were similar at one month between the two groups (25.4% in Artisan, 27% in Carlevale). The mean follow-up was longer in the Artisan group (234.5 days vs. 77 days, p  < 0.001)., Conclusion: Artisan iris-claw IOL seems to induce higher astigmatism than Carlevale sutureless scleral-fixated IOL at one month when injected through a corneal incision, but not when injected through a scleral incision. Therefore cataract surgeons should avoid wide corneal incisions in implantation surgery whenever possible., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the refractive outcomes following the combined intervention of silicon oil (SO) removal and ciliary sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in aphakic eyes after phacovitrectomy., Methods: A retrospective examination of medical records from patients who underwent a combined procedure of SO removal and ciliary sulcus IOL implantation from 2019 to 2022 was performed. The primary outcomes of interest included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), predictive error (PE) and mean absolute predictive error (MAE). Subgroup analyses were performed to compare outcomes between patients with and without intraoperative posterior capsulotomy., Results: The cohort comprised 40 eyes from 40 patients, with a mean duration of SO tamponade of 5.17 ± 1.48 months. A significant improvement in UDVA was observed from 1.58 ± 0.31 logMAR to 0.99 ± 0.31 logMAR one month postoperatively ( P  < 0.01). The PE was -0.73 ± 0.86 diopters (D), and the MAE was 0.90 ± 0.67 D, with 37.50% and 57.50% of cases achieving PE within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D, respectively. No significant differences in UDVA, PE, or MAE were found between the capsulotomy and non-capsulotomy subgroups (all P  > 0.05). However, a lower proportion of eyes in the capsulotomy group achieved PE within ±1.0 D compared to the non-capsulotomy group one month postoperatively (38.90% vs. 72.70%, P  = 0.03)., Conclusions: The combined procedure of SO removal and sulcus IOL implantation resulted in a mild myopic shift in postoperative refraction. Intraoperative posterior capsulotomy seems to increase the lability of postoperative refractive outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Larissa Gouvea,1,2 Kareem Sioufi,3 Colin E Brown,3 George Waring IV,4 Wallace Chamon,2 Karolinne Maia Rocha3 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 3Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 4Waring Vision Institute, Mount Pleasant, SC, USACorrespondence: Larissa Gouvea Toronto Western Hospital - 399 Bathurst Street, 6th Floor East Wing, Reception 1, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, CanadaTel +1 416 603-5401Fax +1 416 603-1993Email gouveaalarissa@gmail.comPurpose: To compare the refractive predictability of intraoperative aberrometry (IA, ORA, Alcon) and Barrett True-K/Universal II formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes.Methods: Retrospective study of normal and post-corneal refractive surgery eyes that underwent cataract surgery with IA at tertiary academic center. Preoperatively, IOL power calculations were performed using Barrett Universal II (normal eyes) or Barrett True-K (post-corneal refractive surgery eyes) formulas. Intraoperatively, aphakic IA measurements were used for IOL power calculations. Mean absolute refractive prediction error (MAE) and the percentage of eyes with prediction error within ± 0.50, ± 0.75 and ± 1.00 D were calculated. Refractive predictability was also evaluated in short, normal, and long eyes.Results: Two hundred and seventy-three eyes were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the MAE of preoperative formulas and IA for post-hyperopic laser vision correction (LVC), post-myopic LVC, post-radial keratotomy (RK) and normal eyes. For prediction error within ± 0.5 D in post-corneal refractive surgery eyes, range of agreement between Barrett True-K and IA ranged from 28% (7/25) of the time in post-RK eyes to 49% (40/81) of the time in post-hyperopic LVC; the corresponding value for Barrett Universal II/IA was 62% (64/103) in normal eyes. When there was disagreement, IA outperformed Barrett True-K in post-hyperopic LVC eyes and Barrett formula outperformed IA in post-myopic LVC, post-RK, and normal eyes.Conclusion: IA appears to be comparable to Barrett formulas for IOL power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes. In post-hyperopic LVC, IA yields better results compared to Barrett True-K formula; in real-life scenarios, IA reveals statistical advantage over the Barrett True-K no history formula for eyes post-hyperopic LVC.Keywords: intraoperative aberrometry, eyes post refractive surgery, refractive outcomes, Barrett True-K formula

The evolution of refractive cataract surgery has increased patient expectations for visual outcomes following cataract surgery. Precise biometry and keratometry are critical for accurate intraocular lens (IOL) selection and favorable surgical outcomes. In patients with the ocular surface disease and corneal pathologies, preoperative measurements can often be erroneous, leading to postoperative refractive surprises and dissatisfied patients. Conditions such as dry eye disease, epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, Salzmann’s nodular dystrophy, and pterygia need to be addressed thoroughly before performing cataract surgery to optimize the ocular surface, obtain high‑quality preoperative measurements, and ultimately determine the appropriate IOLs. In this review, the various ocular surface pathologies affecting cataract surgery outcomes and options for treatment are discussed and the importance of optimization of the ocular surface before cataract surgery is reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arthur B Cummings, Stephanie Naughton, Ann-Marie Coen, Elizabeth Brennan, Gabrielle E Kelly The Wellington Eye Clinic, Dublin, D18 T8P3, IrelandCorrespondence: Arthur B CummingsThe Wellington Eye Clinic, Beacon Court, Level 2, Ste 36 Beacon Hall, Sandyford, Dublin, D18 T8P3, IrelandTel +353 1 2930470Fax +353 1 293 5978Email abc@wellingtoneyeclinic.comPurpose: To compare the accuracy of pre-operative corneal measurements obtained with four devices, and the refractive outcomes of two optical biometers.Setting: Private practice.Design: Retrospective.Methods: Data taken from biometric measurements on 299 consecutive eyes prior to cataract surgery were retrospectively analyzed using the Argos SS-Optical Biometer and the Lenstar LS900 PCI optical biometer. As part of the standard cataract surgery pre-operative exam, patients also underwent placido disk topography and Scheimpflug tomography. Keratometry, anterior chamber depth, corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and axial length were all measured. The comparable measurements were compared. Finally, for those eyes where cataract surgery was performed, the post-operative refractive results were compared to the predictive results of the two biometers.Results: The SS-OCT Argos was able to measure all eyes, while five eyes could not be measured with the Lenstar LS900 PCI. Axial length measurements were performed only with the Argos and Lenstar devices. The eyes that could not be measured by the Lenstar LS900 PCI included dense grade IV nuclear sclerosis and large posterior subcapsular cataracts. In the primary endpoints, there was strong correlation between the Argos and the Lenstar devices in eyes with an axial length between 20 and 30 mm.Conclusion: The predictive accuracies of the Argos Optical Biometer and Lenstar LS900 PCI are similar, except in medium and long eyes, in which the predictive accuracy of Argos SS-OCT biometry was higher. The Argos system was found easier to use by technicians when compared to the other biometry devices.Keywords: comparative analysis, OCT, partial coherence interferometry biometers, cataract surgery, refractive outcomes

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of the Kane formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in comparison with existing formulas by incorporating optional variables into calculation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective review consisted of 78 eyes of patients who had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification with intraocular implantation at Severance Hospital in Seoul, Korea between February 2020 and January 2021. The Kane formula was compared with six of the existing IOL formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer-Q, Haigis, Holladay1, Holladay2, Barrett Universal II) based on the mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentages of eyes within prediction errors of ±0.25D, ±0.50D, and ±1.00D. Results: The Barrett Universal II formula demonstrated the lowest MAEs (0.26±0.17D), MedAEs (0.28D), and percentage of eyes within prediction errors of ±0.25D, ± 0.50D, and ±1.00D, although there was no statistically significant difference between Barrett Universal II-SRK/T (p=0.06), and Barrett Universal II-Kane formula (p<0.51). Following the Barrett Universal II formula, the Kane formula demonstrated the second most accurate formula with MAEs (0.30±0.19D) and MedAEs (0.28D). However, no statistical difference was shown between Kane-Barrett Universal II (p=0.51) and Kane-SRK/T (p=0.14). Conclusion: Although slightly better refractory outcome was noted in the Barrett Universal II formula, the performance of the Kane formula in refractive prediction was comparable in IOL power calculation, marking its superiority over many conventional IOL formulas, such as HofferQ, Haigis, Holladay1, and Holladay2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using Victus platform (Technolas Bausch and Lomb (B&L), Munich, Germany) and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). Methods A retrospective study of 100 eyes operated for cataract. FLACS was performed in 50 eyes and CPCS was done in another 50 eyes. Preoperative and 6 months postoperative visual and refractive evaluation (efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism) as well as higher-order aberrations were analyzed. Efficacy index which equals post-operative mean of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) divided by preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was calculated in both groups. Safety index equals post-operative mean of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) divided by preoperative mean CDVA. Results Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR), UDVA improved in both groups after surgery (p

Purpose: To analyze the reliability of the refractive results prediction obtained in intraocular lens (IOL) calculation using bicylindric power calculation method, with the use of steep and flat keratometry readings compared with the classical mean keratometry calculation method. Methods: Fifty-seven eyes of 57 subjects who underwent cataract surgery were included in this prospective study. Optical biometry was performed with IOLMaster 700 and IOL power calculation was performed using both keratometry readings and the surgically induced astigmatism. Four weeks after surgery, subjective refraction was done. Finally, results obtained with both IOL calculation methods were compared. Results: Mean spherical equivalent using bicylindric IOL power calculation method was -0.082 ± 0.296D, and achieved mean spherical equivalent using classical IOL power method with Haigis formula was -0.088 ± 0.405D. Achieved mean spherical equivalent obtained in subjective refraction after surgery was -0.101 ± 0.265D. Linear correlation between bicylindric method spherical equivalent calculation and achieved spherical equivalent was statistically significant (r = 0.761, P < 0.001), also correlation between Haigis spherical equivalent calculation and achieved spherical equivalent was statistically significant (r = 0.339, P = 0.010). Emmetropia was achieved in 49 of 57 (85.86%) subjects and bicylindric method calculated that 49 of 57 (85.86%) of subjects would get emmetropia (P = 1.000). Classical IOL power calculation estimated that 38/57 subjects would get emmetropia (66.67%) (P = 0.026). Conclusion: The IOL power calculation including both keratometry readings and surgically induced astigmatism seems to be more accurate and provides more precision in refractive prediction than classical calculation method.

The purpose of this study was to summarize the results related to ocular biometry performed using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). A literature search was conducted to search articles reporting the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent examinations with commercially available SS-OCT machines. The available data were thoroughly analyzed, with a particular focus on all the biometric factors used to calculate the power of intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted during cataract surgery. The agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of several parameters among different devices were examined. The variations found for parameters obtained from agreement testing were evaluated in order to promote the interchangeability of devices. Swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers usually produce highly repeatable and reproducible results. The excellent results obtained led us to the conclusion that optical biometers based on SS-OCT technology will probably take the lead in ocular biometry.

Purpose: To compare two swept-source OCT optical biometers, the Anterion® (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and the IOLMaster 700® (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), in the analysis of biometric data, intraocular lens (IOL) calculation and postoperative spherical equivalent predictability., Methods: This was a real-life, single-center, retrospective study including 152 eyes of 81 consecutive patients referred for cataract surgery. All patients were examined with the IOLMaster 700® and the Anterion®. Biometric data (axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth [ACD], mean keratometry [Km], K1 [flat keratometry], K2 [steep keratometry] and axis, TK1 [flat total keratometry], TK2 [steep total keratometry], central pachymetry, lens thickness [LT], white-to-white distance [WTW]), IOL calculation with the SRK/T formula, and postoperative refractive outcome at 1 month were compared., Results: All biometric measurements were significantly different between the two biometers. Correlations were excellent for AL, pachymetry, ACD, LT and keratometry measurements, and for the IOL calculation (r>0.96, intraclass correlation coefficient=1). The IOL power for emmetropia was similar between both biometers when the SRK/T formula was used (20.84±3.24D versus 20.86±3.29D, P=0.61). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent prediction error calculated using the SRK/T formula was 0.03±0.5D for the IOLMaster 700® versus 0.01±0.47D for the Anterion® (P=0.12)., Conclusions: This study showed excellent correlation and agreement for the biometric measurements and the IOL power calculation with the SRK/T formula between both biometers., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare refractive results after cataract surgery using AL-Scan and IOL-Master500 optical biometers for intraocular lens power calculation. Methods: 78 eyes of 78 consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery and implanted with the same intraocular lens (Eyecryl Plus HSAS600) were included in the study. In Group 1, preoperative biometry was performed with AL-Scan, and in Group 2, with IOL Master 500. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and mean absolute refractive error (MARE) at preoperative and 6-month follow-up visits were recorded. Results: The postoperative mean MARE was -0.28±0.30 Diopter (D) and -0.32±1.13 D in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.38). At the 6th month visit, 92% of eyes in Group 1 were within 0.50 D of target refraction in Group 1 and, 93% of eyes in Group 2 were within 0.50 D (p=0.99). Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly in both groups (p<0.001). The mean postoperative UDVA were 0.72±0.12 and 0.66±0.16 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.20). No sight-threatening complication occurred during or after the operation in either group. Conclusion: These findings show the AL - Scan provides comparable postoperative results with the IOL Master after implantation of the same intraocular lenses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the outcomes of implanting a new polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) ring (Neoring; AJL Ophthalmic) in pre-descemet deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (PD-DALK) procedure for moderate-advanced keratoconus.Methods: This prospective study included 10 eyes of 10 patients with moderate-advanced keratoconus who underwent PD-DALK with Neoring implantation. Neoring was implanted in a pre-descemetic pocket. The post-operative examination included refraction, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal tomography, and endothelial cell density (ECD). The root mean squares (RMSs) for coma-like aberrations and spherical aberration were evaluated for a pupil size of 4.5 mm. The junctional graft (Tg) and host (Th) thicknesses were measured. The post-operative follow-up was 24 months.Results: Post-operative CDVA was 0.82 ± 0.14 (decimal scale), 100% of the eyes achieved a CDVA of 0.7 (decimal scale). The refractive cylinder was −2.86 ± 1.65 2-years after surgery. No eyes had a post-operative refractive cylinder ≥5.00 D and in five eyes (50%), it was ≤2.50 D. At the last visit, the mean keratometry was 45.64 ± 1.96 D, the RMS for coma-like aberrations was 0.30 ± 0.15 μm and spherical aberration was 0.22 ± 0.09. The mean ECD remains without changes over the follow-up (P = 0.07). At the last visit, Tg and Th were 679.9 ± 39.0 and 634.8 ± 41.2 μm, respectively. The thickness of the complex (host-Neoring) was 740.6 ± 35.6 μm. In all cases, this thickness was thicker than Tg.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that PD-DALK along Neoring implantation is a viable, effective, and safe option to optimize the post-operative results for moderate-severe keratoconus.

A post-operative manifest refractive error as close as possible to target is key when performing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, given that residual astigmatism and refractive errors negatively impact patients’ vision and satisfaction. This review explores refractive outcomes prior to modern biometry; advances in biometry and its impact on patients’ vision and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery; key factors that affect prediction accuracy; and residual refractive errors and the impact on visual outcomes. There are numerous pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors that can influence refractive outcomes after cataract surgery, leaving surgeons with a small “error budget” (i.e., the source and sum of all influencing factors). To mitigate these factors, precise measurement and correct application of ocular biometric data are required. With advances in optical biometry, prediction of patient post-operative refractory status has become more accurate, leading to an increased proportion of patients achieving their target refraction. Alongside improvements in biometry, advancements in microsurgical techniques, new IOL technologies, and enhancements to IOL power calculations have also positively impacted patients’ refractory status after cataract surgery.

Abstract Background Intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different diopter (D) intervals may have different tolerance, and may provide different accuracy of refractive outcome after cataract surgery. The aim of the study is to compare the accuracy of refractive outcome after implantation of IOLs with different D intervals after cataract surgery. Methods A total of 80 eyes from 40 patients who underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a 0.50 D interval Akreos AO IOL in one eye and a 0.25 D interval Softec HD™ IOL in the other eye were enrolled. The percentages of eyes with refractive prediction error within ±0.50 D at one month after surgery were compared. To evaluate the effect of the dioptric errors of the IOL itself on refractive prediction error, the percentage of eyes with refractive prediction error within ±0.25 D of the IOL with a standard deviation (SD) of ±0.40 D was compared with that of the IOL with a SD of ±0.11 D through Monte Carlo simulations. Results In this clinical study, the percentage of eyes with refractive prediction error within ±0.50 D by the Haigis formula in the Softec HD™ group (85.0%) was significantly greater than that in the Akreos AO group (57.5%; P = 0.027). In Monte Carlo simulations, all percentages of eyes with refractive prediction error within ±0.25 D by the Haigis and SRK/T formulas in the Softec HD™ group were significantly greater than those in the Akreos AO group. Conclusions The IOL with a 0.25 D interval was more accurate than the IOL with a 0.50 D interval in predicting refractive outcome after cataract surgery. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials KCT0002192, Retrospectively registered (Date of registration: 6 January 2017).

Abstract Background To investigate refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c) to correct high myopia. Methods Sixty seven eyes of 38 patients who underwent ICL V4c implantation were enrolled. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was − 12.44 ± 3.15 D (range: − 6.63 to − 20.50 D). The refractive outcomes and optical quality of the eyes at postoperative 1 and 3 months were evaluated and compared. Results At 3 months postoperatively, the mean safety and efficacy indexes were 1.33 ± 0.22 and 1.14 ± 0.23, respectively. The mean SE was − 0.32 ± 0.52 D; no patient lost 1 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 13% remained unchanged, 45% gained 1 line and 42% gained 2 or more lines. The mean modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTFcutoff), Strehl in two dimensions ratio, and objective scatter index (OSI) were 38.20 ± 9.96 cycles per degree, 0.21 ± 0.06, and 1.00 ± 0.73, respectively. No significant difference was found in any of the above parameters (P > 0.05) between 1 and 3 months. The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) did not change when compared with preoperative values (P > 0.05). Conclusions ICL V4c implantation is a safe, effective, and stable solution for high myopia. Patients will acquire high and stable postoperative optical quality. ICL V4c implantation has little influence on IOP.

Abstract Background To retrospectively analyse strategies for adjusting refractive surgery plans with reference to the preoperative manifest refraction. Methods We constructed seven nomograms based on the refractive outcomes (sphere, cylinder, axis [SCA]) of 150 consecutive eyes treated with laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism. We limited the initial data to the SCA of the manifest refraction. All nomograms were based on the strategy: if for x diopters (D) of attempted metric, y D is achieved; we can reverse this sentence and state for achieving y D of change in the metric, x D will be planned. The effects of the use of plus or minus astigmatism notation, spherical equivalent, sphere, principal meridians notation, cardinal and oblique astigmatism, and astigmatic axis were incorporated. Results All nomograms detected subtle differences in the spherical component (p

Purpose: To analyze the reliability of the refractive results prediction obtained in intraocular lens (IOL) calculation using bicylindric power calculation method, with the use of steep and flat keratometry readings compared with the classical mean keratometry calculation method.Methods: Fifty-seven eyes of 57 subjects who underwent cataract surgery were included in this prospective study. Optical biometry was performed with IOLMaster 700 and IOL power calculation was performed using both keratometry readings and the surgically induced astigmatism. Four weeks after surgery, subjective refraction was done. Finally, results obtained with both IOL calculation methods were compared.Results: Mean spherical equivalent using bicylindric IOL power calculation method was -0.082 ± 0.296D, and achieved mean spherical equivalent using classical IOL power method with Haigis formula was -0.088 ± 0.405D. Achieved mean spherical equivalent obtained in subjective refraction after surgery was -0.101 ± 0.265D. Linear correlation between bicylindric method spherical equivalent calculation and achieved spherical equivalent was statistically significant (r = 0.761, P < 0.001), also correlation between Haigis spherical equivalent calculation and achieved spherical equivalent was statistically significant (r = 0.339, P = 0.010). Emmetropia was achieved in 49 of 57 (85.86%) subjects and bicylindric method calculated that 49 of 57 (85.86%) of subjects would get emmetropia (P = 1.000). Classical IOL power calculation estimated that 38/57 subjects would get emmetropia (66.67%) (P = 0.026).Conclusion: The IOL power calculation including both keratometry readings and surgically induced astigmatism seems to be more accurate and provides more precision in refractive prediction than classical calculation method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using Victus platform (Technolas Bausch and Lomb (B&L), Munich, Germany) and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS).Methods: A retrospective study of 100 eyes operated for cataract. FLACS was performed in 50 eyes and CPCS was done in another 50 eyes. Preoperative and 6 months postoperative visual and refractive evaluation (efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism) as well as higher-order aberrations were analyzed. Efficacy index which equals post-operative mean of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) divided by preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was calculated in both groups. Safety index equals post-operative mean of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) divided by preoperative mean CDVA.Results: Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR), UDVA improved in both groups after surgery (p < 0.05). It was 0.23 ± 0.20 and 0.291 ± 0.311 log MAR in FLACS and CPCS groups respectively. Safety index was 1.777 in FLACS group and 1.744 in CPCS groups showing high degree of safety of both measures. Mean surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was 0.35 ± 0.67 D and 0.901 ± 0.882 D in FLACS and CPCS groups respectively (p = 0.015). The post-operative comparison between both groups was in favor of CPCS group vs. FLACS group regarding total aberrations (0.563 ± 0.386 vs. 0.91 ± 1.20) (p = 0.03), while low order aberrations were significantly less in FLACS group vs. CPCS group (0.64 + 0.63 vs. 2.07 + 3.15) (p = 0.027). RMS high order aberration was higher in FLACS group vs. CPCS group but of no statistical significance 0.54 ± 0.96 vs. 0.328 ± 0.360 (p = 0.082).Conclusion: Femtosecond laser -assisted cataract surgery was a safe and precise procedure but enhanced visual outcomes only minimally when compared to conventional cataract surgery in experienced hands. Both FLACS and manual surgeries can achieve a high efficacy, predictability and safety with slight superior outcomes in FLACS.Trial Registration Number: PACTR201804003256258 (date: 27 Mar 2018) Available at: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the refractive outcomes following cataract surgery using conventional keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) for intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in the SRK/T, HofferQ, Haigis, and Holladay 1 and 2, as well as Barrett and Barrett TK Universal II formulas. Methods: Sixty eyes of 60 patients from Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, were prospectively enrolled in this comparative study. Eyes were assessed using a swept-source optical biometer (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Posterior keratometry, K, TK, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, axial length, and white-to-white corneal diameter were recorded. Emmetropic IOL power was calculated using K and TK in all formulas. Selected IOL power and predicted refractive outcomes were recorded. Postoperative manifest refraction was measured 3 months postoperatively. Mean absolute errors (MAEs), median absolute errors (MedAEs), and percentage of eyes within ± 0.25, ± 0.50, and ± 1.00 D of predicted refraction were calculated for all formulas in both groups. Results: Mean difference between K and TK was 0.03 D (44.56 ± 1.18 vs. 44.59 ± 1.22 D), showing excellent agreement (ICC = 0.99, all p < 0.001). Emmetropic IOL powers in all formulas for both groups were very similar, with a trend toward lower MAEs and MedAEs for TK when compared with K. The Barrett TK Universal II formula demonstrated the lowest MAEs. Proportion of eyes within ± 0.25, ± 0.50, and ± 1.00 D of predicted refraction were slightly higher in the TK group. Conclusions: Conventional K and TK for IOL calculation showed strong agreement with a trend toward better refractive outcomes using TK. The same IOL constant can be used for both K and TK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare axial length (AL) and the refractive outcome after phacoemulsification surgery from 2014 to 2019 at Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Terengganu, Malaysia., Method: This was a retrospective record review of all cataract patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent uneventful superior wound phacoemulsification with nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2019. Using optical biometry or immersion technique, the preoperative AL determined solely via the Sanders, Retzlaff and Kraff 2 (SRK2) formula was selected. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at 6 weeks-12 weeks was retrieved. Using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0, the mean differences between targeted and actual postoperative SE were analysed based on the AL., Result: In this study, 490 eyes of 472 patients aged 25 years old-88 years old (mean age 65.72 years old [SD 8.83]) were involved. There were 162 eyes (33%) in Group A (< 23 mm), 189 eyes (39%) in Group B (23.01 mm-24.0 mm) and 139 eyes (28%) in Group C (> 24.0 mm). The mean AL was 23.63 mm (SD 1.19). The mean differences between the targeted and actual postoperative SE were: -0.09 D (SD 0.60) in Group A, -0.07 D (SD 0.53) in Group B and -0.16 D (SD 0.52) in Group C. No significant difference was found between these groups ( P = 0.327)., Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the refractive outcome using the SRK2 formula in different ALs after phacoemulsification surgery. Hence, there is no reason to modify or adjust the targeted SE based on AL., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: None., (© Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2024.)

Purpose: To report outcomes of phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) to correct high ametropia. Setting: Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal. Methods: Retrospective case series with 11 eyes submitted to phakic IOL implantation after DALK. Main outcomes measured were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), refractive error components, tomographic parameters and endothelial cell density (ECD). The minimum follow-up was 3 years for all cases. Results: Mean ECD loss was 8.7±6.7% at 1 year, 13.1±8.6% at 3 years (n=11; p=0.016, p=0.007, respectively) and 14.0±20.4% at 5 years (n=5, p=0.212). Mean logMAR UDVA increased from 1.27±0.90logMAR preoperatively to 0.16±0.15logMAR postoperatively (p≤0.001) and no statistically significant differences were registered during follow-up. All patients gained at least 5 lines of UDVA. 54.5% of the eyes gained 1 line in CDVA postoperative and only one eye lost one CDVA line through follow-up. Efficacy and safety indexes at 1 and 3 years were 1.01–0.97 and 1.24–1.21, respectively. Mean spherical equivalent was reduced from −7.84±4.63 D preoperatively to −1.05±1.07 D postoperatively (p=0.001). Mean percentage of reduction in refractive cylinder and spherical error was 83.8±15.8% and 73.1±31.5%, respectively, p≤0.001 for both. In one eye there was a significantly gradual ECD loss over 5 years follow-up and the patient will be submitted to IOL explant. Conclusion: Phakic IOLs were effective for correction high ametropia after DALK, showing high efficacy and safety indexes with stability over time. However, it was registered a continuing endothelial cell loss postoperatively, which assumed to be higher than those reported in eyes without DALK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate axial length (AL) measurements and refractive outcomes in vitrectomy combined with cataract operation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with wholly detached macula. Study design: Retrospective, consecutive, comparative, clinical study. Methods: We reviewed the data of patients treated by vitrectomy combined with cataract operation for RRD. The group "Attach" (n=31) consisted of eyes in which retina was not detached within 1.5 disc diameters from the foveal center, and the group "Detach" (n=33) consisted of eyes in which that area was detached entirely. Only those eyes inthe group "Detach", only the eyes (n=20) which AL were measured similar to those fellow eyes were compared to the group "Attach" (n=31). Refractive shift (RS) was defined as the average of the difference between postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and predicted SE. Results: AL was well measured by A-scan ultrasonography (A-scan) in all 31 eyes of the group "Attach" and their RS was ‒0.57 diopters (D). AL was measured by A-scan similar to the fellow eye in 20 of 33 eyes (60.6%) of the group "Detach", and the RS was ‒0.09 D. The AL difference as much as central subfield macular thickness (about 300um) can make this difference of RS (0.48 D, P=0.025) Conclusion: When AL can be measured by A-scan similar to its fellow eye in RRD with wholly detached macula, RS would be smaller than that of the wholly attached macula after phacovitrectomy. It assumed that AL was measured from the RPE under the detached macula in RRD with wholly detached macula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM:To study the outcomes of ReLEx® small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)for correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism in terms of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, aberrations, and dry eye.METHODS: In this prospective, non-randomized clinical study, done at Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, a total of 600 eyes that met the inclusion criteria underwent a thorough preoperative examination, including corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA), contrast sensitivity, aberrometry, and dry eye assessment. VisuMax femtosecond laser system was used to perform SMILE. Patients were followed up on 1, 15d and 3mo. Pre and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), CDVA, aberrations, dry eye, and contrast sensitivity during 3mo of follow-up were recorded. Data analysis was done with the help of a computer using SPSS for Windows Software(version 17.0, SPSS, Inc., New York, USA). A paired t-test was used to test the significance of difference between quantitative variables and Yate's Chi-square test for qualitative variables. P value less than 0.05 denoted a significant relationship.RESULTS: The study enrolled 600 eyes of 305 patients, of which 10 patients underwent SMILE in 1 eye only due to anisometropia. At 3mo, 98.83% of eyes had attained a UCVA of 20/20 or better. No patient had a loss of CDVA, and 37 eyes(6.17%)showed a gain in 1 line in postoperative CDVA. Postoperative induction of coma and spherical aberrations was minimal. Contrast sensitivity reduced immediate postoperatively(PP=0.43, 0.47, 0.46)CONCLUSION:Our results demonstrate the high refractive accuracy and safety of ReLEx® SMILE for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Increase in postoperative dryness and aberrations, both accepted drawbacks of any corneal refractive surgery were observed, while decrease in contrast sensitivity was insignificant at lower spatial frequencies.