Search

Introduction: Antipsychotic psychopharmacotherapy is associated with the risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). However, understanding specific risk factors remains challenging due to limited data. This study investigates the relationship between receptor binding affinities and occupancies of antipsychotics and their associated hepatotoxic risks. Methods: A disproportionality analysis with calculation of the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and the Information Component (IC) was conducted using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify signals related to the Standardised MedDRA Query "drug-related hepatic disorders", which served as a proxy for drug-induced hepatotoxicity. This was followed by a pharmacoepidemiologic-pharmacodynamic approach to investigate the relationship between the ROR and substance-related receptor binding affinities and occupancy, which was estimated based on in vitro receptor-binding profiles. Results: Significant signals were identified for several antipsychotics, including chlorpromazine, loxapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine, with chlorpromazine and loxapine showing the highest RORs for DILI. Gender-specific analysis revealed a higher frequency of signals in female patients. Statistically significant negative correlations were identified between the ROR for drug-related hepatic disorders and the affinity for serotonin receptor 5-HT1A (r (17) = -0.68, p = 0.0012), while a positive correlation was observed for cholinergic receptors (r (17) = 0.46, p = 0.048). No significant correlations were found related to other receptors or drug properties. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the serotonin and probably the cholinergic system may play a role in the development of DILI related to antipsychotic medications. The identification of antipsychotics with a higher association with DILI, such as chlorpromazine, underscores the need for careful monitoring in clinical practice. However, our findings need further longitudinal studies to confirm causality. A better understanding of the associations may inform clinical decision-making, particularly in patients with an increased susceptibility to liver damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionAntipsychotic psychopharmacotherapy is associated with the risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). However, understanding specific risk factors remains challenging due to limited data. This study investigates the relationship between receptor binding affinities and occupancies of antipsychotics and their associated hepatotoxic risks.MethodsA disproportionality analysis with calculation of the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and the Information Component (IC) was conducted using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify signals related to the Standardised MedDRA Query “drug-related hepatic disorders”, which served as a proxy for drug-induced hepatotoxicity. This was followed by a pharmacoepidemiologic-pharmacodynamic approach to investigate the relationship between the ROR and substance-related receptor binding affinities and occupancy, which was estimated based on in vitro receptor-binding profiles.ResultsSignificant signals were identified for several antipsychotics, including chlorpromazine, loxapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine, with chlorpromazine and loxapine showing the highest RORs for DILI. Gender-specific analysis revealed a higher frequency of signals in female patients. Statistically significant negative correlations were identified between the ROR for drug-related hepatic disorders and the affinity for serotonin receptor 5-HT1A (r (17) = -0.68, p = 0.0012), while a positive correlation was observed for cholinergic receptors (r (17) = 0.46, p = 0.048). No significant correlations were found related to other receptors or drug properties.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the serotonin and probably the cholinergic system may play a role in the development of DILI related to antipsychotic medications. The identification of antipsychotics with a higher association with DILI, such as chlorpromazine, underscores the need for careful monitoring in clinical practice. However, our findings need further longitudinal studies to confirm causality. A better understanding of the associations may inform clinical decision-making, particularly in patients with an increased susceptibility to liver damage.

Prucalopride has been used in adults with gastroparesis, accelerating gastric emptying. There are no studies with this drug in gastroparetic children. An 8-year-old boy is presented who consulted for a month of postprandial symptoms, with a diagnosis of gastroparesis by gastric emptying scintigraphy. He did not improve with metoclopramide, domperidone, erythromycin, and esomeprazole. He received prucalopride for two periods (for 178 and 376 days) at doses: 0.03 - 0.04 mg/ kg/day, presenting improvement in the follow-up with the cardinal gastroparesis symptom index and gastric emptying scintigraphy. Due to the good response, prucalopride may be a therapeutic option in pediatric gastroparesis.