Search

Objective: Although quetiapine has been approved for use in schizophrenic patients, its individualized dosage regimen remains unclear, especially with respect to drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Thus, we investigated the potential DDIs and optimal initial dosage of quetiapine in schizophrenic patients based on population pharmacokinetics (PPK). Methods: Ninety-six schizophrenic patients treated with quetiapine were included to establish the PPK model, which also includes coadministration of multiple drugs. Results: It was found that the patient weights and fluvoxamine or duloxetine coadministration affected quetiapine clearance in schizophrenic patients. Without fluvoxamine or duloxetine coadministration, 16 and 12 mg/kg/day of quetiapine were recommended to schizophrenic patients whose weights were in the ranges of 40–50 and 50–120 kg, respectively. With fluvoxamine coadministration, 8 mg/kg/day of quetiapine was recommended to patients with weights in the range of 40–120 kg. With duloxetine coadministration, 8 mg/kg/day of quetiapine was recommended to patients with weights in the 40–120 kg range. With simultaneous coadministration of fluvoxamine and duloxetine, 4 mg/kg/day of quetiapine was recommended to patients with weights in the 40–120 kg range. Conclusion: The present study was a pilot effort at investigating the potential DDIs and optimal initial dosage of quetiapine in schizophrenic patients based on PPK. The initial dosages of quetiapine administered to the patients were optimized according to the coadministration of fluvoxamine or duloxetine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Within the scope of this study, bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) nanoparticles have been synthesized by a simple method, and the usability of these nanoparticles as adsorbents has been investigated. For this purpose, Bi2O3 nanoparticles were synthesized by a chemical method. These particles were characterized by various methods such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area, scanning electron microscopy, and X‐ray diffraction. The nature of the synthesized nanoparticles was confirmed by characterization results and the synthesized particles were found to be nanoscale. As a result of the characterization, the average particle diameters and surface areas were found to be 22.24, 32.24 and 49.98 nm, and 5.95, 3.54 and 0.75 m2 g−1 for different calcination temperatures of 105, 250 and 600 °C, respectively. Adsorption parameters such as initial quetiapine concentration, bismuth oxide nanoparticle dosage, temperature, equilibrium contact time, and pH were also studied. Moreover, kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamics modeling of adsorption have been performed to account for the adsorption mechanism of quetiapine by Bi2O3 nanoparticles. RESULTS: The thermodynamic study has specified that adsorption has been spontaneous and exothermic. The kinetic study has pointed out that a pseudo‐second‐order model (R2 = 0.9853) has been favorable to the data. Furthermore, a Freundlich isotherm model (R2 = 0.8258) has been better fitted to the experimental adsorption results. The maximum adsorption capacity and percentage of adsorption values were 27.38 mg g−1 and 76.81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The outcomes demonstrate that synthesized Bi2O3 nanoparticle is an influential adsorbent for removing quetiapine. Also, the obtained results enabled us to estimate the possibility of using Bi2O3 nanoparticles to remove active pharmaceutical ingredients by adsorption. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antipsychotic prescribing trends vary internationally, albeit off-label use remains high (i.e., target symptoms). We aim to describe antipsychotic use, target conditions, target symptoms and dosing regimens in children and adolescents in Ireland. We used a sampled cohort from a national audit of children and adolescents attending mental health services with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria from Jul-2021 to Dec-2021 who were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication and up to and including 17-years of age (n = 3528). Each service provided anonymised data. We described the frequency of antipsychotic medication, medication type, target condition, target symptom and medication doses. We used multivariable logistic regression, adjusted with available co-variates to assess the association of being prescribed an antipsychotic medication. Twelve percentage (n = 437) were prescribed an antipsychotic and 16–17-years (n = 211, 48.3%) was the most common age category. The commonest reason for prescribing an antipsychotic was target symptoms (i.e., off-label use) (n = 329; 75.%) and of these symptoms, agitation (n = 77/329; 25%) and irritability (56/239; 25%) were the most common. Quetiapine (n = 127; 29%) was the most common antipsychotic, followed by risperidone (n = 125; 28.6%), aripiprazole (n = 107; 24.5%), and olanzapine (n = 66; 15.1%). In adjusted analysis, having a psychotic disorder ((adjusted-odds-ratio) aOR: 39.63, CI 95%, 13.40–117.22), bipolar disorder (aOR: 16.96, CI 95%, 3.60–80.00), autism spectrum disorder (aOR: 3.24, CI 95%, 2.45–4.28) or aggression symptoms (aOR: 16.75, CI 95%, 7.22–38.89) was associated with prescribing an antipsychotic medication. This is the first study in children and adolescents that describes the target conditions and target symptoms for antipsychotic use in Ireland. Our results show a high proportion of antipsychotic prescribing based on target symptoms rather than target condition or diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Metamizole is quite an old drug with analgesic, antipyretic and spasmolytic properties. Recent findings have shown that it may induce several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, especially CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The clinical relevance of these properties is uncertain. We aimed to unravel potential pharmacokinetic interactions between metamizole and the CYP3A4 substrate quetiapine. Methods: Plasma concentrations of quetiapine from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database were analysed. Two groups of 33 patients, either receiving quetiapine as a monotherapy (without CYP modulating comedications) or with concomitantly applied metamizole, were compared addressing a potential impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine being reflected in differences of plasma concentrations of quetiapine and dose‐adjusted plasma concentrations. Results: Patients comedicated with metamizole showed >50% lower plasma concentrations of quetiapine (median 45.2 ng/mL, Q1 = 15.5; Q3 = 90.5 vs. 92.0 ng/mL, Q1 = 52.3; Q3 = 203.8, P =.003). The dose‐adjusted plasma concentrations were 69% lower in the comedication group (P =.001). Subgroup analyses did not suggest a dose dependency of the metamizole effect or an influence of quetiapine formulation (immediate vs. extended release). Finally, the comedication group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients whose quetiapine concentrations were below the therapeutic reference range (78.8% in the metamizole group vs. 54.4% in the control group, P =.037) indicating therapeutically insufficient drug concentrations. Conclusion: The combination of metamizole and quetiapine leads to significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, probably via an induction of CYP3A4. Clinicians must consider the risk of adverse drug reactions, especially treatment failure under quetiapine when adding metamizole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Morbid hunger and hyperphagia (MHH) is a rare neurological disorder that can manifest following damage to the right frontal and temporal lobes. It can lead to detrimental short and long-term complications such as electrolyte imbalances, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. This report details the case of a young male patient who developed MHH five months post-traumatic brain injury. Method: Single-case report. The patient exhibited colossal appetite, overeating, food-demanding behavior, and rapid weight gain. The prescription of quetiapine to manage his visual and auditory hallucinations was suspected of exacerbating the hyperphagia. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach was implemented, encompassing a meticulous dietary regime, environmental modifications, behavioral management, physical activities, therapeutic exercises, and pharmacological interventions, which included switching the anti-psychotics and introducing low-dose escitalopram. Results: Over the course of 6 months, the MHH gradually subsided, and the patient achieved the target bodyweight. The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended improved from 3 to 5. Conclusion: This is the first report on the use of escitalopram to manage secondary eating disorders. Our findings underscore the necessity to formally catalog and recognize disorders like MHH in diagnostic classifications to facilitate the systematic study of their pathophysiology, natural history, prognosis, and management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long‐term sample stability of five atypical antipsychoticdrugs risperidone, paliperidone, clozapine, quetiapine and olanzapine and the antidepressant drug mirtazapine in serum was studied by use of a newly developed and validated analytical method based on solid‐phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Ascorbic acid was used as an antioxidative agent to stabilize olanzapine during storage and sample preparation. We assessed analyte stability on long‐term storage in serum samples at 25°C, 5°C, −20°C and −80°C, and during five freeze–thaw cycles. Analytes were stable for 23 days at room temperature except for olanzapine and mirtazapine (17 days). All analytes were stable for at least 30 days at 5°C. All analytes were stable for 270 days at −20°C, except for paliperidone and mirtazapine with 60 days and 180 days, respectively. All analytes were stable for 270 days at −80°C. Furthermore, all analytes were stable for five freeze–thaw cycles. We recommend storage at −80°C when samples drawn for analysis of antipsychotic drugs are stored for more than 60 days, whereas a temperature of −20°C is sufficient for storage less than 60 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine (QTP) is a moderately water-soluble biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) class II antipsychotic drug used to treat schizophrenia. Carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) microspheres were prepared using a co-precipitation approach. The Quetiapine was translocated to the brain through a nasal route using carboxymethyl chitosan-calcium carbonate (CMC-CaCO3) hybrid microspheres. During this process, optimization controlled the size of the microspheres by controlling the volume of solution, precipitating agent, and concentration ratios of the precursors. The optimized batch showed a narrow size distribution with high stability in the dispersed phase as characterized by dynamic light scattering. Preliminary characterization revealed crosslinking formation between the carboxymethyl groups of chitosan and the CaCO3 may be responsible for the spherical structure. The preliminary evaluations were done with Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and UV visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis). The surface morphology was assessed by scanning electron microscopy that showed the microscale range of the spherical-shaped particles. The ex-vivo mucoadhesive studies suggested a high binding affinity toward mucin, having a sustained release effect for up to 8 h. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine myristate (QM), an ester‐bonded lipophilic prodrug of quetiapine (QTP), is synthesized and converted into an amphiphilic structure in acidic pH to trigger a novel self‐assembled QM nanosuspension (QMN). Following injection, this QMN rearranges within physiological pH to form nanoaggregates in structure, resulting in enhanced physicochemical properties and in vivo therapeutic performance without an initial burst release. The 200‐nm‐sized QMN exhibits less invasive injection, higher drug content, and better storage stability profile than conventional poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) (PLGA) nanosuspensions containing QTP or QM. Following a single intramuscular injection to beagle dogs (35 mg kg−1 QTP), QMN undergoes pH‐responsive nanoaggregation to form the lipophilic prodrug, providing esterase‐oriented sustained release for five weeks compared with the two‐week period of PLGA nanosuspensions. Notably, QMN exhibits improved in vivo pharmacokinetic performance with long‐acting delivery while minimizing issues associated with polymeric PLGA formulations, including the initial massive burst release, cellular toxicity, and adverse side effects. These results support the further development of QMN as a novel long‐acting injectable to improve patient compliance and dosing frequency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A sustainable HPTLC-densitometric method was developed for quantitative determination of Quetiapine (QUET), Levodopa (LD) and Carbidopa (CD) in presence of Dopamine (DOP) as an internal standard. This applicable technique was achieved by spiking human plasma and extraction was performed using the protein precipitation approach. The mobile phase used was acetone, dichloromethane, n-butanol, glacial acetic acid and water (3: 2.5: 2: 2: 1.75, by volume). Method validation was done according to US-FDA guidelines and was able to quantify Quetiapine, Levodopa and Carbidopa in the ranges of 100–4000, 200–8000 and 30–1300 ng/mL, respectively. Bioanalytical method validation parameters were assessed for the studied drugs. Finally, the analytical suggested methodology was evaluated using various green and white analytical chemistry metrics and other tools, such as the green solvent selection tool, analytical eco-scale, green analytical procedure index, analytical greenness metric approach and the red–green–blue algorithm tool. The results revealed that the applied analytical method had a minor impact on the environment and is a relatively greener option than other previously reported chromatographic methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine is a second-generation atypical antipsychotic drug that has been commonly prescribed for the treatment of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (depression), and other psychological disorders. Targeted inhibition of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide gated (HCN) channels, which generate Ih, may provide effective resistance against schizophrenia and depression. We investigated if HCN channels could contribute to the therapeutic effect of quetiapine, and its major active metabolite norquetiapine. Two-electrode voltage clamp recordings were used to assess the effects of quetiapine and its active metabolites 7-hydroxyquetiapine and norquetiapine on currents from HCN1 channels expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Norquetiapine, but not quetiapine nor 7-hydroxyquetiapine, has an inhibitory effect on HCN1 channels. Norquetiapine selectively inhibited HCN1 currents by shifting the voltage-dependence of activation to more hyperpolarized potentials in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 13.9 ± 0.8 µM for HCN1 and slowing channel opening, without changing the kinetics of closing. Inhibition by norquetiapine primarily occurs from in the closed state. Norquetiapine inhibition is not sensitive to the external potassium concentration, and therefore, likely does not block the pore. Norquetiapine inhibition also does not dependent on the cyclic-nucleotide binding domain. Norquetiapine also inhibited HCN4 channels with reduced efficacy than HCN1 and had no effect on HCN2 channels. Therefore, HCN channels are key targets of norquetiapine, the primary active metabolite of quetiapine. These data help to explain the therapeutic mechanisms by which quetiapine aids in the treatment of anxiety, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, and may represent a novel structure for future drug design of HCN inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pimavanserin is an efficacious, atypical neuroleptic. It ameliorates the frequency and severity of hallucinations and delusions in patients with Parkinson's disease with psychosis. Most antipsychotic drugs directly block dopamine receptors and thus worsen motor behavior. In contrast, pimavanserin reduces the activity of excitatory serotonin receptor subtypes. They stimulate dopaminergic pathways in the mesolimbic system. As a result, onset of psychosis may occur particularly in patients on a chronic dopamine-substituting treatment regimen, like in Parkinson's disease. Areas covered: This narrative drug evaluation describes the properties and effects of pimavanserin. It is approved for the treatment of psychosis in Parkinson's disease. A literature search was performed using the terms dopamine, levodopa, psychosis, and Parkinson's disease without standardized selection of cited references. Expert opinion: An essential advantage of pimavanserin is the focus in the pivotal trials on the treatment of psychosis in patients with Parkinson's disease. Main competitors for the use in clinical practice are the atypical neuroleptic compounds quetiapine and clozapine. Both share considerable structural and pharmacological similarities, i.e. certain anticholinergic properties. They are recommended in guidelines. Once pimavanserin will become available as a generic drug, its use will probably increase worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 100,306 drug overdose deaths occurred in the US during a 12-month period ending in April 2021. Opioids were involved in 75% of these related deaths. Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a constantly evolving public health crisis with potentially lethal consequences. In 2017, 900 adolescents began to misuse opioids every day. Nearly 10% of high school seniors reported using opioids nonmedically. Additionally, the incidence for hospitalizations for adolescents among children 1-19 years of age increased nearly 2-fold from 1997 to 2012. This data emphasizes the dangers associated with the increasing accessibility of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical opioids, particularly for adolescents. All three of the currently FDA approved medications for OUD have shown clear efficacy in decreasing all-cause mortality in adults. It is proposed that the same effects should be seen in adolescents but limited data is present. A recent study analyzed buprenorphine and naltrexone treatment amongst OUD in adolescents between 2001-2014; only 1 in 4 youth received any medication therapy within six months of diagnosis. Adolescents under 16 were the most likely to receive medications. However, even adolescents aged 17, for whom buprenorphine is FDA approved for, were less likely to receive therapy than adults over 18 years of age. The following case report aims to demonstrate how subcutaneous extended release buprenorphine treatment can be initiated effectively as an outpatient in an adolescent with OUD. It is critical that clinicians work to expand access to pharmacotherapy for adolescents struggling with OUD to ensure proper management and reduction of opioid-related overdoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Bipolar disorder is a recurrent mental health disorder with a prevalence rate of 1.4%. On average, there can be a delay of 9.5 years from the initial presentation of symptoms to a confirmed diagnosis. Individuals living with bipolar disorder have a reduced life expectancy. There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of antidepressants in treating bipolar disorder. The ASCEnD clinical trial will test the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of the aripiprazole/sertraline combination in comparison with quetiapine for the treatment of bipolar depression (individuals who suffer from depressive episodes in bipolar disorder) and will include a nested qualitative study. Methods: The qualitative study will use semi‐structured interviews to explore pilot trial participants' and clinicians' perspectives on recruitment procedures, the acceptability of the intervention, the management of bipolar disorder and attitudes to medication combinations. Conclusion: Findings will inform recruitment strategies and optimise training for the participating sites in the ASCEnD full trial. They will also help to illuminate the lived experience of people with bipolar disorder and the clinicians who work with people with bipolar disorder. The discussion will explore perspectives on the delay in diagnosis, having a diagnosis, the impact of living with bipolar disorder and attitudes to treatment, including drug combinations. Patient or Public Contribution: A Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) has been convened with the support of the McPin Foundation, which will contribute to the ASCEnD trial and its nested qualitative study to provide input on the design and delivery of the trial and qualitative study, analysis of qualitative data and dissemination of findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past decade, increasing off‐label use of quetiapine has been reported worldwide from various sources. We wanted to investigate how this is reflected in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data. Requisitions for serum concentration measurements of quetiapine from a TDM service in Central Norway during 2001–2019 were obtained and analysed for age, gender, trends in quetiapine doses, serum concentrations and indicators of diagnoses. There were 19 759 requisitions from 7459 individuals. Daily doses of quetiapine decreased by 24 mg per year (95% CI: −25.61 to −21.48, p < 0.001, N = 4505). A corresponding decrease in quetiapine serum concentrations was not seen. The proportion of requisitions with diagnoses indicating reimbursable use was 13% for the whole study period. Mean daily doses were slightly higher in the reimbursable group, but declined over time in these samples, as well. To our understanding, these results signal a trend towards lower prescribed doses of quetiapine, possibly reflecting drug repurposing and/or off‐label use. The discrepancy in the decrease of doses versus serum concentrations may reflect the intake of higher doses than prescribed and/or inappropriate TDM sampling. Our findings show that TDM data have limitations when it comes to making inferences about the use of quetiapine based on serum concentrations and clinical information on the requisitions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microneedles (MNs) are minimally invasive transdermal drug delivery systems capable of penetrating the stratum corneum to overcome the barrier properties. The primary objective of this research was to prepare dissolving microneedle patches (DMNP) loaded with quetiapine (QTP). DMNP were fabricated employing the solvent casting technique, utilizing various polymer feed ratios including polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 (PVP-K30), and polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) polymers. The loaded DMNP with QTP underwent a comprehensive characterization process encompassing assessments for compatibility, thickness, insertion potential, morphology, thermal behavior, X-ray diffraction, ex-vivo permeation, skin irritation, and histopathological changes. FTIR studies confirmed the compatibility of QTP with the microneedle patch composites. The thickness of the drug-loaded DMNP ranged from 0.67 mm to 0.97 mm. These microneedles exhibited an impressive penetration depth of 480 μm, with over 80% of the needles maintaining their original shape after piercing Parafilm-M. SEM analysis of the optimized DMNP-2 revealed the formation of sharp-tipped and uniformly surfaced needles, measuring 570 μm in length. Remarkably, the microneedles did not elicit any signs of irritation upon application of the prepared DMNP. The DMNP-2 showcased an impressive cumulative ex-vivo permeation of QTP, reaching 17.82 µg/cm2/hr. Additionally, histopathological assessment of vital organs in rabbits attested to the safety profile of the formulated microneedle patches. In conclusion, the developed microneedle patch represents a promising strategy for enhancing the transdermal delivery of QTP. This innovative approach has the potential to increase patient compliance, offering a more efficient and patient-friendly method of administering QTP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Evidence of the effects of chronic caffeine (CAFF)-containing beverages, alone or in combination with agomelatine (AGO) or quetiapine (QUET), on electroencephalography (EEG), which is relevant to cognition, epileptogenesis, and ovarian function, remains lacking. Estrogenic, adenosinergic, and melatonergic signaling is possibly linked to the dynamics of these substances. Objectives: The brain and ovarian effects of CAFF were compared with those of AGO + CAFF and QUET + CAFF. The implications of estrogenic, adenosinergic, and melatonergic signaling and the brain-ovarian crosstalk were investigated. Methods: Adult female rats were administered AGO (10 mg/kg), QUET (10 mg/kg), CAFF, AGO + CAFF, or QUET + CAFF, once daily for 8 weeks. EEG, estrous cycle progression, and microstructure of the brain and ovaries were examined. Brain and ovarian 17β-estradiol (E2), antimullerian hormone (AMH), estrogen receptor alpha (E2Rα), adenosine receptor 2A (A2AR), and melatonin receptor 2 (MT2R) were assessed. Results: CAFF, alone or combined with AGO or QUET, reduced the maximum EEG peak, which was positively linked to ovarian E2Rα, negatively correlated to cortical neurodegeneration and ovarian MT2R, and associated with cystic ovaries. A large corpus luteum emerged with AGO + CAFF and QUET + CAFF, antagonizing the CAFF-mediated increased ovarian A2AR and reduced cortical E2Rα. AGO + CAFF provoked TTP delay and increased ovarian AMH, while QUET + CAFF slowed source EEG frequency to δ range and increased brain E2. Conclusions: CAFF treatment triggered brain and ovarian derangements partially antagonized with concurrent AGO or QUET administration but with no overt affection of estrus cycle progression. Estrogenic, adenosinergic, and melatonergic signaling and brain-ovarian crosstalk may explain these effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sepsis constitutes a condition that involves life-threatening organ dysfunction induced by severe infection. This nested case–control study investigated risk factors for severe sepsis and whether antipsychotic use is associated with severe sepsis risk in patients with schizophrenia, a topic that has not been comprehensively explored in previous studies. Methods: We selected 39,432 patients with schizophrenia aged between 15 and 65 years from Taiwan's Psychiatric Inpatient Medical Claims database for the period 2000–2012. The case group comprised patients with severe sepsis after their first psychiatric admission (n = 1382). The case and control groups were randomly matched (1:4) by age, sex and first psychiatric admission (year) and finally comprised 1382 and 5528 individuals, respectively. We employed multivariable conditional logistic regression to identify (1) risk factors (physical illnesses and nonpsychiatric medications) and (2) antipsychotic–severe sepsis associations. Results: Higher numbers of psychiatric admissions and physical illnesses such as delirium, cerebrovascular disease and cancer were significantly associated with a higher risk of severe sepsis. Furthermore, severe sepsis was associated with the use of antithrombotic agents, systemic corticosteroids and agents targeting the renin–angiotensin system. Clozapine (adjusted risk ratio = 1.65) and quetiapine (adjusted risk ratio = 1.59) use were associated with an increased risk of severe sepsis. The use of more than one antipsychotic drug could further increase this risk. Conclusion: Several physical illnesses and nonpsychiatric medications increase the risk of severe sepsis in patients with schizophrenia. Specifically, clozapine or quetiapine use significantly increased the risk of severe sepsis in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The administration of sedatives to critically ill patients is a common practice in intensive care units (ICU) and has been associated with negative outcomes. To mitigate this, atypical antipsychotics are utilized as adjunctive therapy. This study aims to review and quantify overall effectiveness of the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine on reduction in the amount of continuous infusion propofol utilized in the ICU. Methods: This was an observational study that took place from February 27, 2021 to December 31, 2022. The primary outcome of this study was the percentage change in average propofol infusion rate (mcg/kg/min) from baseline to the greater than 24 to 48 hours period after atypical antipsychotic initiation. Secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, QTc interval monitoring, and continuation of the antipsychotic without a valid indication. Descriptive statistics were utilized for the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The average baseline propofol rate was 31 mcg/kg/min, which reduced 8.6% to 28.35 mcg/kg/min over the 0 to 24 hours period, was reduced by 19.4% compared to baseline to a rate of 25 mcg/kg/min during the greater than 24 to 48 hours period, and finally a percent reduction of 54.2% seen during the greater than 48 to 72 hours period to a rate of 14 mcg/kg/min. Conclusions: Patients who received an adjunctive antipsychotic saw resulting propofol rate reductions of 8.6% at 24 hours, 19.4% at 48 hours, and 54.2% at 72 hours. However, research on this topic should not end here, as further investigation with higher-level study design is needed to determine the true impact of these agents for this indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the population of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), most studies compared the use of atypical antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, with the use of traditional haloperidol in patients with delirium of various forms and etiologies. The role of such agents in patients with hyperactive delirium is not fully understood. This study compares the effectiveness of quetiapine with haloperidol in treating the hyperactive form of delirium in terms of their effects on the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98), length of stay in the ICU, and mortality in critically ill patients. Methods: One hundred adult patients diagnosed with hyperactive delirium were randomly assigned to receive either oral quetiapine (25–50 mg/day) or haloperidol (1–2 mg/day). The response, defined as "a DRS-R-98 severity score reduction from baseline of 50% or more" and a DRS-R-98 severity score of 12 or less without relapse, was the primary outcome. Results: The mean age of all patients was 68 ± 6 years. The study population's overall response rate was 92%. Response rates for the two groups were remarkably equal (p = 0.609). Secondary outcomes were comparable in both groups, such as ICU mortality (p = 0.496), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.321), in-hospital stay (p = 0.310), and the need for mechanical ventilation (p > 0.99). But the quetiapine group showed a statistically reduced mean ICU stay (10.1 ± 2.0 vs. 11.7 ± 2.6 days, p = 0.018) and increased sleeping hours per night (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Quetiapine may be equally as effective as haloperidol in treating the symptoms of hyperactive delirium in critically ill patients, with no mortality benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) is a prevalent non-motor symptom associated with Parkinson's disease. The treatment options for PDP are limited, and its pharmacological management remains ambiguous. This study aimed to evaluate the existing evidence in relation to clinical practice. Methods: This multi-methods study consisted of a systematic review of reviews, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered with PROSPERO. Following data extraction and assessment using the AMSTAR 2 tool, a narrative synthesis was performed. In the second phase of the study, a questionnaire was developed, validated, piloted, and distributed to the heads of specialized PD clinics in Germany and Austria. Results: The search resulted in the inclusion of eleven reviews. The quality of eight of these reviews was rated as high (n = 7) or moderate (n = 1). The reviews indicated that clozapine and pimavanserin demonstrated the highest efficacy and tolerability. Other antipsychotic medications either failed to alleviate PDP symptoms or resulted in distinct motor complications. The survey findings also favored clozapine for its efficacy in managing PDP and improving quality of life, although quetiapine was regarded as effective and pimavanserin was not available. Clinicians reported initiating antipsychotic treatment at various stages of PDP, with a tendency to reduce the dosage or discontinue D2 agonists or anticholinergics. Conclusions: The reviewed literature and the survey results consistently favored clozapine for its efficacy and tolerability in treating PDP. It may be considered the first-line treatment, with pimavanserin as an alternative option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to investigate the ambiguous findings of earlier research regarding the reduction of quetiapine plasma levels when combined with lamotrigine, most likely via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase induction by lamotrigine. Methods: One thousand one hundred and fifty samples, divided into four groups of patients receiving either quetiapine immediate- (IR) or extended-release (XR) without or in combination with lamotrigine were compared regarding absolute and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations. Furthermore, samples of intra-individual controls were analyzed. Results: Patients receiving quetiapine IR in combination with lamotrigine showed 31% lower plasma (p = 0.002) and 23% lower dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (p = 0.004) compared to those receiving IR monotherapy. The proportion of patients with quetiapine plasma concentrations below the lower limit of the therapeutic reference range was 50% and 30% in the combination group and in patients receiving monotherapy, respectively (p = 0.03). However, no significant differences regarding plasma concentration (p = 0.13) and dose-adjusted plasma concentration (p = 0.42) were observed in patients with combination vs. monotherapy with the XR formulation of quetiapine. In the intra-individual controls, no trends could be identified, possibly due to insufficient number of samples (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The combination of quetiapine IR with lamotrigine is associated with significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, potentially impacting quetiapine effectiveness. For quetiapine ER, a significant interaction is less likely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract A sustainable HPTLC-densitometric method was developed for quantitative determination of Quetiapine (QUET), Levodopa (LD) and Carbidopa (CD) in presence of Dopamine (DOP) as an internal standard. This applicable technique was achieved by spiking human plasma and extraction was performed using the protein precipitation approach. The mobile phase used was acetone, dichloromethane, n-butanol, glacial acetic acid and water (3: 2.5: 2: 2: 1.75, by volume). Method validation was done according to US-FDA guidelines and was able to quantify Quetiapine, Levodopa and Carbidopa in the ranges of 100–4000, 200–8000 and 30–1300 ng/mL, respectively. Bioanalytical method validation parameters were assessed for the studied drugs. Finally, the analytical suggested methodology was evaluated using various green and white analytical chemistry metrics and other tools, such as the green solvent selection tool, analytical eco-scale, green analytical procedure index, analytical greenness metric approach and the red–green–blue algorithm tool. The results revealed that the applied analytical method had a minor impact on the environment and is a relatively greener option than other previously reported chromatographic methods. Graphical Abstract

The involvement of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the metabolism of quetiapine has been proposed, though conclusive evidence is lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the impact of CYP3A5 genetic variability on quetiapine exposure in a Chinese patient population. Patient data were retrospectively collected from the database of the Mental Health Centre at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, covering the period from September 1, 2019, to July 1, 2023. The study included patients genotyped for CYP3A5 who were treated with quetiapine. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, such as serum concentrations of the drug and its metabolites, included oral administration of quetiapine, availability of information on the prescribed daily dose and concomitant medications, and the determination of steady-state blood levels at the time of sampling (after at least 3 days of continuous administration at the same dose). Exclusion criteria comprised polypharmacy with known CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors, as well as patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the exposure to quetiapine and N-dealkylquetiapine, measured using dose-corrected concentrations (C/D). The secondary endpoint was the metabolism of quetiapine to N-dealkylquetiapine, assessed by the ratio of metabolite to parent drug concentrations. The third endpoint is the differences in adverse reactions, QTc intervals, and biochemical parameters among patients with different CYP3A5 genotypes. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, clinical data from 207 patients were ultimately included in the study. Of these, 20 patients had the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype, 78 had the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype, and 109 had the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. The CYP3A5*3 variant was found to significantly impact the metabolism of quetiapine. The C/D values for both quetiapine and N-dealkyl quetiapine were notably higher in individuals with the *3/*3 genotype compared to those with the *1/*1 and *1/*3 genotypes (P 1 < 0.001 and P 2 = 0.002, respectively). A comparison of the variability in metabolic ratios among different genotype groups revealed no significant difference (P = 0.067). However, a post hoc analysis indicated that the metabolic ratio in poor metabolizers was significantly lower than that in intermediate metabolizers (P = 0.021). The analysis of adverse reaction incidence and QTc intervals among different genotypes showed no statistically significant differences (P = 0.652, P = 0.486). However, comparison of biochemical parameters across different genotype groups revealed that alanine aminotransferase, uric acid, hemoglobin, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were significantly higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype compared to those with the CYP3A5*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 genotypes. The results indicated that the genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5*3 significantly influences the metabolism of quetiapine. Specifically, carriers of the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype exhibited higher blood levels of quetiapine, with a greater likelihood of these levels exceeding the therapeutic range. This finding underscores the need for clinicians to pay special attention to the efficacy and occurrence of adverse reactions when prescribing quetiapine to patients carrying the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. • The study investigated CYP3A5 polymorphisms in the Chinese population and their impact on quetiapine. • CYP3A5 polymorphisms significantly slowed the metabolism of quetiapine. • No significant difference in quetiapine dosing among different genotypes. • CYP3A5 polymorphisms were linked to higher quetiapine plasma concentrations above the therapeutic range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Individuals with bipolar disorders (BD) have heterogenic pre‐onset illness courses and responses to treatment. The pattern of illness preceding the diagnosis of BD may be a marker of future treatment response. Here, we examined associations between psychiatric morbidity preceding the diagnosis of BD and pharmacological treatment patterns in the 2 years following diagnosis. Methods: In this register‐based study, we included all patients with a diagnosis of BD attending Danish Psychiatric Services between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016. We examined the association between a diagnosis of substance use disorder, psychosis (other than schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder), unipolar depression, anxiety/OCD, PTSD, personality disorder, or ADHD preceding BD and pharmacological treatment patterns following the diagnosis of BD (lithium, valproate, lamotrigine, antidepressants, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine) via multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, sex, and year of BD diagnosis. Results: We included 9594 patients with a median age of 39 years, 58% of whom were female. Antidepressants, quetiapine, and lamotrigine were the most commonly used medications in BD and were all linked to prior depressive illness and female sex. Lithium was used among patients with less diagnostic heterogeneity preceding BD, while valproate was more likely to be used for patients with prior substance use disorder or ADHD. Conclusion: The pharmacological treatment of BD is linked to psychiatric morbidity preceding its diagnosis. Assuming that these associations reflect well‐informed clinical decisions, this knowledge may inform future clinical trials by taking participants' prior morbidity into account in treatment allocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many articles suggest that clozapine was strongly associated with a higher incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus, and the issue has remained unsettled. Many articles have compared clozapine with FGAs, but few have compared clozapine with SGAs. We aimed to compare the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in adults with schizophrenia treated with clozapine and other SGAs. We conducted a comprehensive search of databases from their inception up until August 26, 2023. The specific databases include PubMed, Embase and others. We included non-randomized controlled trials involving the use of SGAs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, amisulpride, and zotepine, with a focus on new-onset diabetes mellitus as an outcome. We utilized odds ratio with 95 % credible intervals (95 % CI) as our effect size measures. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42024511280. We included 7 studies with sufficient data to include in the meta-analysis. A total of eight studies with 641,48 participants met the eligibility criteria. The OR of the incidence rates of new-onset diabetes between clozapine and olanzapine was 0.95 (95 % CI:[0.82–1.09]), between clozapine and risperidone was 1.25 (95 % CI: [1.09–1.44]), between clozapine and quetiapine was 1.44 (95 % CI: [0.92–2.25]). In patients with schizophrenia, clozapine has been found to have a higher rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to risperidone. However, there was no significant difference in incidence rate between clozapine versus olanzapine and quetiapine. These findings can assist clinicians in balancing the risks and benefits of those drugs. • Differences in the incidence of new-onset diabetes caused by second-generation antipsychotics were compared. • Clozapine and olanzapine cause a similar incidence of new-onset diabetes. • Clozapine is more likely to cause new-onset diabetes than risperidone. • Explored relationship between therapy duration and incidence [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Sleep-related disorders are associated with pain, fatigue, and deficits in cognitive performance, which may interfere with successful rehabilitation. The study objectives were to (1) quantify outpatient prescriptions for insomnia medications during the first year following combat-related amputations, (2) examine longitudinal changes in prescriptions for insomnia medications, and (3) analyze patient characteristics associated with prescriptions for insomnia medications. Material and Methods This was a retrospective study of DoD casualty records from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Dataset and prescriptions for outpatient medications from the Pharmacy Data Transaction Service. Patients were a total of 1,651 U.S. service members who sustained major limb amputations in Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom from 2001 through 2017 and had outpatient prescriptions for any medication during the first year postinjury. Prescriptions for medications recommended for insomnia were low-dose antidepressants, anxiolytic sedatives, benzodiazepines, melatonin receptor agonist, and low-dose quetiapine. These prescription medications were analyzed by medication type, postinjury time, and patient characteristics during the first year postinjury. Results During the first year postinjury, 78% of patients (1,291 of 1,651) had outpatient prescriptions for insomnia medications, primarily anxiolytic sedative drugs (e.g. zolpidem), averaging a total of 86 prescription days (median = 66). The prevalence of these prescriptions declined substantially during the first year, from 57% of patients during the first quarter to 28% during the fourth quarter postinjury. In univariate analyses, multiple patient characteristics, including high Injury Severity Score, continued opioid and non-opioid analgesic prescriptions, and diagnoses of chronic pain, mood disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder, were significantly associated with higher prevalence and duration of outpatient prescriptions for insomnia medications. Conclusions The present results indicate a high prevalence of outpatient prescriptions for insomnia medications following combat-related amputations, a prevalence that is substantially higher than previously reported among active duty personnel. These findings can inform DVA/DoD guidelines for amputation care and insomnia among military subpopulations. The results highlight the need for more research on the treatment of insomnia during early postinjury rehabilitation among patients who sustained serious combat injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Olanzapine is used for treating bipolar disorder (BPD); however, the optimal initial dosing regimen is unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) based on a real-world study. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with BPD from the real-world study were collected to construct the MIPD model. Results: Weight, combined used quetiapine influenced olanzapine clearances in patients with BPD, where the clearance rates were 0.152:1 in patients with or without quetiapine under the same weight. We simulated olanzapine doses once a day or twice a day, of which twice a day was optimal. Without quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.80, 0.70, and 0.60 mg/kg/day were suitable for 40- to 56-kg BPD patients, 56- to 74-kg BPD patients, and 74- to 100-kg BPD patients, respectively. With quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.05 mg/kg/day was suitable for 40- to 100-kg BPD patients. Conclusion: This study was the first to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via MIPD based on a real-world study, providing clinical reference for the precision medication of olanzapine in BPD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Voltage‐dependent K+ (Kv) channels play an important role in restoring the membrane potential to its resting state, thereby maintaining vascular tone. In this study, native smooth muscle cells from rabbit coronary arteries were used to investigate the inhibitory effect of quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent, on Kv channels. Quetiapine showed a concentration‐dependent inhibition of Kv channels, with an IC50 of 47.98 ± 9.46 μM. Although quetiapine (50 μM) did not alter the steady‐state activation curve, it caused a negative shift in the steady‐state inactivation curve. The application of 1 and 2 Hz train steps in the presence of quetiapine significantly increased the inhibition of Kv current. Moreover, the recovery time constants from inactivation were prolonged in the presence of quetiapine, suggesting that its inhibitory action on Kv channels is use (state)‐dependent. The inhibitory effects of quetiapine were not significantly affected by pretreatment with Kv1.5, Kv2.1, and Kv7 subtype inhibitors. Based on these findings, we conclude that quetiapine inhibits Kv channels in both a concentration‐ and use (state)‐dependent manner. Given the physiological significance of Kv channels, caution is advised in the use of quetiapine as an antipsychotic due to its potential side effects on cardiovascular Kv channels. The primary goal of this study was to examine the direct effect of quetiapine on vascular Kv channels. Our results indicate that quetiapine reduces Kv currents in both concentration‐ and use (state)‐dependent manners. This inhibition is characterized by a shift in the steady‐state inactivation curve, with no effect on the activation curve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), esketamine nasal spray (NS) significantly increased the probability of remission at Week 8, and of being relapse-free through Week 32 after remission at Week 8, versus quetiapine extended release (XR) in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Here, we explore the time course, burden and consequences of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the phase IIIb ESCAPE‑TRD trial. Patients with TRD were randomised 1:1 to esketamine NS or quetiapine XR, dosed per label alongside an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In this secondary publication, safety analyses (comprising patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment) included incidence, severity and durations (Kaplan‑Meier method) of TEAEs, and subsequent dispositional changes. P values were not adjusted for multiple testing. 336 patients were randomised to esketamine NS and 340 to quetiapine XR; 334 and 336 received ≥1 dose of study treatment, respectively. TEAEs were significantly more common with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (91.9 % versus 78.0 %; p < 0.001), but were typically mild/moderate and transient in nature: a greater proportion resolved on the same-day (92.0 % versus 12.1 %) and lead to treatment discontinuation in significantly fewer patients (4.2 % versus 11.0 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion of days spent with TEAEs was significantly lower with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (median: 11.9 % versus 21.3 %; p < 0.001). Although more frequent with esketamine NS, TEAEs were typically transient and mild, with discontinuation less likely versus quetiapine XR. Data were consistent with established safety profiles, with no new safety signals identified. Alongside greater efficacy, the demonstrably more favourable tolerability profile of esketamine NS versus quetiapine XR further supports its use for TRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to describe the patterns and trends in antipsychotic prescription among Dutch youth before and during the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (between 2017 and 2022). The study specifically aims to determine whether there has been an increase or decrease in antipsychotic prescription among this population, and whether there are any differences in prescription patterns among different age and sex groups. The study utilized the IADB database, which is a pharmacy prescription database containing dispensing data from approximately 120 community pharmacies in the Netherlands, to analyze the monthly prevalence and incidence rates of antipsychotic prescription among Dutch youth before and during the pandemic. The study also examined the prescribing patterns of the five most commonly used antipsychotics and conducted an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) analysis using data prior to the pandemic, to predict the expected prevalence rate during the pandemic. The prescription rate of antipsychotics for Dutch youth was slightly affected by the pandemic, with a monthly prevalence of 4.56 [4.50–4.62] per 1000 youths before COVID-19 pandemic and 4.64 [4.59–4.69] during the pandemic. A significant increase in prevalence was observed among adolescent girls aged 13–19 years. The monthly incidence rate remained stable overall, but rose for adolescent girls aged 13–19 years. Aripiprazole, and Quetiapine had higher monthly prevalence rates during the pandemic, while Risperidone and Pipamperon had lower rates. Similarly, the monthly incidence rates of Aripiprazole and Olanzapine went up, while Risperidone went down. Furthermore, the results from the ARIMA analysis revealed that despite the pandemic, the monthly prevalence rate of antipsychotic prescription was within expectation. The findings of this study suggest that there has been a moderate increase in antipsychotic prescription among Dutch youth during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in adolescent females aged 13–19 years. However, the study also suggests that factors beyond the pandemic may be contributing to the rise in antipsychotic prescription in Dutch youth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although guidelines recommend twice daily (BID) dosing of quetiapine for treatment of intensive care unit (ICU) delirium in most patients, once daily dosing at bedtime (HS) is commonly prescribed to reduce daytime somnolence. No studies have evaluated differences in outcomes. Objectives: To determine if twice daily vs bedtime dosing of quetiapine reduces the duration of ICU delirium. Methods: Retrospective analysis of ICU patients treated with twice daily vs bedtime dosing of quetiapine for ICU delirium. Health records were analyzed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Exclusions included alcohol withdrawal, history of psychiatric conditions requiring medication, receipt of <24 hours of therapy, alternative dosing schedules, and death or transfer from the ICU <24 hours after beginning quetiapine. The primary outcome was recovery of delirium per Confusion Assessment Method (CAM-ICU). Secondary outcomes included lengths of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, in-hospital death, and QTc prolongation. Results: Baseline characteristics differed for sex (30.4% vs 61.1% female) and admission diagnosis (39% vs. 17% COVID-19, respectively). Time to delirium recovery was 3.5 days for BID vs 2.5 days for QHS dosing (P =.484). Secondary outcomes of ICU (16 vs. 19 days) and hospital (22 vs. 25 days) lengths of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation (10 vs. 14), delirium recovery (70% vs. 56%), in-hospital death (61% vs. 50%), and QTc prolongation did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: Twice daily vs bedtime dosing of quetiapine did not significantly alter delirium outcomes, suggesting similar efficacy. Larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Good adherence to antipsychotic therapy helps prevent relapses in first-episode psychosis (FEP). We used data from the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration, an international consortium of observational cohorts, to emulate a target trial comparing antipsychotics, with treatment discontinuation as the primary outcome. Other outcomes included all-cause hospitalization. We benchmarked our results to estimates from the European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial, a randomized trial conducted in the 2000s. We included 1097 patients with a psychotic disorder and less than 2 years since psychosis onset. Inverse-probability weighting was used to control for confounding. The estimated 12-month risks of discontinuation for aripiprazole, first-generation agents, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone were 61.5% (95% CI, 52.5-70.6), 73.5% (95% CI, 60.5-84.9), 76.8% (95% CI, 67.2-85.3), 58.4% (95% CI, 40.4-77.4), 76.5% (95% CI, 62.1-88.5), and 74.4% (95% CI, 67.0-81.2), respectively. Compared with aripiprazole, the 12-month risk differences were -15.3% (95% CI, -30.0 to 0.0) for olanzapine, -12.8% (95% CI, -25.7 to -1.0) for risperidone, and 3.0% (95% CI, -21.5 to 30.8) for paliperidone. The 12-month risks of hospitalization were similar between agents. Our estimates support use of aripiprazole and paliperidone as first-line therapies for FEP. Benchmarking yielded similar results for discontinuation and absolute risks of hospitalization as in the original trial, suggesting that data from the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration sufficed to remove confounding for these clinical questions. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Researchers often conduct small studies on testing a drug's efficacy in off-label indications. If positive results from these exploratory studies are not followed up by larger, randomized, double-blinded trials, physicians cannot be sure of a drug's clinical value. This may lead to off-label prescriptions of ineffective treatments. We aim to describe the way clinical studies fostered off-label prescription of the antipsychotic drug quetiapine (Seroquel). Methods: In this systematic meta-epidemiological analysis, we searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL and PsycINFO databases and included clinical studies testing quetiapine for unapproved indications between May 1995 and May 2022. We then assessed the frequency with which publications providing low-level evidence suggesting efficacy of quetiapine for off-label indications was not followed up by large, randomized and double-blinded trials within 5 years. Results: In total, 176 published studies were identified that reported potential efficacy of quetiapine in at least 26 indications. Between 2000 and 2007, publication of exploratory studies suggesting promise for off-label indications rapidly outpaced publication of confirmatory trials. In the 24 indications with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up from the first positive exploratory study, 19 (79%) were not followed up with large confirmatory trials within 5 years. At least nine clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of quetiapine for seven off-label indications in which published confirmatory evidence is lacking. Conclusion: Many small, post-approval studies suggested the promise of quetiapine for numerous off-label indications. These findings generally went unconfirmed in large, blinded, randomized trials years after first being published. The imbalance of exploratory and confirmatory studies likely encourages ineffective off-label treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stevens–Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TNE) overlap is a rare skin disorder characterized by erythema, blisters, extensive exfoliation, epidermal detachment, the involvement of multiple mucosae, and positive Nikolsky's sign. SJS-TEN has a high mortality rate. Our case involves a rare occurrence of drug-induced Stevens–Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap with a delayed onset in the setting of quetiapine and famotidine therapy. Case presentation: An 82-year-old Taiwanese female was admitted to our hospital for decreased urine output, generalized edema, and multiple skin blisters and bedsores. With further spread of the lesions, multiple ruptured bullae with shallow erosions on the face, trunk, and limbs and mucosal involvement affected 20% of the total body surface area. Nikolsky's sign was positive. A diagnosis of Steven–Johnson syndrome was highly suspected. One month prior, she had started famotidine and quetiapine. Intravenous methylprednisolone treatment was initiated, which ameliorated the skin lesions after 3 days. However, new lesions developed after only 1 day of methylprednisolone tapering. The patient died 12 days after admission. Conclusion: Stevens–Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis is a rare skin disorder. Although it is mainly acute and has a high mortality rate, delayed onset can still occur. Quetiapine and famotidine are generally safe and effective for treating geriatric and gastrointestinal problems, but rare drug hypersensitivity reactions can lead to debilitating consequences. Therefore, increased clinical awareness and the initiation of supportive care are imperative. Optimal management guidelines are still lacking, and confirmation of developed guidelines through randomized controlled trials is needed. Collaboration for better management strategies is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, including hallucinations. The use of antipsychotic medications is a common strategy to manage hallucinations associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). However, careful consideration is necessary when selecting the most appropriate drug due to the potential risks associated with the available treatment options. Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs), such as Pimavanserin and Clozapine, have effectively controlled PDP symptoms. On the contrary, the support for utilizing quetiapine is not as substantial as other antipsychotics because research studies specifically investigating its application are still emerging and relatively recent. The broad mechanisms of action of AAPs, involving dopamine and serotonin receptors, provide improved outcomes and fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics. Conversely, other antipsychotics, including risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and lurasidone, have been found to worsen motor symptoms and are generally not recommended for PDP. While AAPs offer favorable benefits, they are associated with specific adverse effects. Extrapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, hypotension, constipation, and cognitive impairment are commonly observed with AAP use. Clozapine, in particular, carries a risk of agranulocytosis, necessitating close monitoring of blood counts. Pimavanserin, a selective serotonin inverse agonist, avoids receptor-related side effects but has been linked to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation, while quetiapine has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of mortality. This review aims to analyze the benefits, risks, and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic medications to assist clinicians in making informed decisions and enhance patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antipsychotics are frequently used for inpatients with alcohol withdrawal syndromes (AWS). While there is evidence on the effects of these medications in other settings there is little data on the mortality rate associated with these drugs for the treatment of AWS) We utilized the national COSMOS Epic database to identify inpatients with AWS. We then assessed the mortality rate for adult patients with or without the use of anti-psychotics along with subsets of patients based on age, gender, race, and ethnicity. We identified 233,821 patients of whom 26% received antipsychotic agents. The mortality rate was 1.5%. Patients aged 60 or over and those who received typical antipsychotic agents had a higher mortality rate. The use of typical antipsychotic agents is associated with a higher mortality rate. The use of any antipsychotic agent in patients aged 60 or over is associated with an increased mortality rate. Further study of this effect is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Τhe aim of the present study was to investigate the use of vitreous humor as an alternative biological material in forensic toxicology for the determination of quetiapine, 7-hydroxy-quetiapine, and nor-quetiapine. The distribution of these substances in vitreous humor was studied by determining and correlating their concentrations in vitreous humor with the respective concentrations in blood. Methods: During this study, a method for the determination of these substances was developed, validated and applied to postmortem samples obtained from 16 relative forensic cases. The sample preparation procedure included the isolation of the analytes from vitreous humor and blood samples using solid-phase extraction, with Bond Elut LRC C18 columns followed by derivatization with BSTFA with 1% TMCS prior to GC/MS analysis. Results: The developed method is characterized by a dynamic range of 10.0–1000.0 ng/mL (R2 ≥ 0.991) for the three substances, with a limit of detection and quantification of 3.0 and 10.0 ng/mL, respectively. Accuracy and precision were below 8.09% and 8.99%, respectively, for both biological materials, while absolute recovery for the three substances was greater than 81%. According to the results, quetiapine, 7-hydroxy-quetiapine, and nor-quetiapine are easily distributed in vitreous humor. Conclusion: The results of the study indicate the usefulness of vitreous humor in toxicological analysis for the determination of these substances, especially when the traditional biological materials are not available. The levels of quetiapine and its metabolites in vitreous humor as well as the vitreous humor to blood concentration ratios can provide important information for a more thorough toxicological investigation of forensic cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveBipolar affective disorder (BAD) is a mood disorder with high morbidity and mortality. Quetiapine can be used in the treatment of patients with BAD; however, the precise administration regimen of quetiapine in these patients is still unknown. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of quetiapine in patients with BAD was constructed based on model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) and real-world clinical data and an optimal initial dose of quetiapine in these patients was recommended.MethodsA total of 99 patients with BAD treated with quetiapine were included. At the same time, the quetiapine concentrations, the physical and chemical indices of the patients, and the drug combination information were collected. A quetiapine PPK model for patients with BAD was then constructed and an initial dose based on Monte Carlo simulation was recommended.ResultsIn the final model of quetiapine for patients with BAD, the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and the apparent volume of distribution (V/F) were 76.1 L/h and 530 L, respectively. For patients with BAD weighing 40–66 kg, the initial dose recommendation was 16 mg kg−1 day−1, the probability of reaching the therapeutic window was 78.8%–82.2%, and the probability of exceeding the upper limit of the therapeutic window was 5.2%–10.3%. For patients with BAD weighing 66–120 kg, the initial dose recommendation was 12 mg kg−1 day−1, the probability of reaching the therapeutic window was 81.5%–85.5%, and the probability of exceeding the upper limit of the therapeutic window was 3.6%–8.1%.ConclusionThe present study, for the first time, recommended an initial dose of quetiapine in patients with BAD based on MIPD and real-world data, providing an individualized reference for the administration of quetiapine in these patients.

ObjectiveAlthough quetiapine has been approved for use in schizophrenic patients, its individualized dosage regimen remains unclear, especially with respect to drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Thus, we investigated the potential DDIs and optimal initial dosage of quetiapine in schizophrenic patients based on population pharmacokinetics (PPK).MethodsNinety-six schizophrenic patients treated with quetiapine were included to establish the PPK model, which also includes coadministration of multiple drugs.ResultsIt was found that the patient weights and fluvoxamine or duloxetine coadministration affected quetiapine clearance in schizophrenic patients. Without fluvoxamine or duloxetine coadministration, 16 and 12 mg/kg/day of quetiapine were recommended to schizophrenic patients whose weights were in the ranges of 40–50 and 50–120 kg, respectively. With fluvoxamine coadministration, 8 mg/kg/day of quetiapine was recommended to patients with weights in the range of 40–120 kg. With duloxetine coadministration, 8 mg/kg/day of quetiapine was recommended to patients with weights in the 40–120 kg range. With simultaneous coadministration of fluvoxamine and duloxetine, 4 mg/kg/day of quetiapine was recommended to patients with weights in the 40–120 kg range.ConclusionThe present study was a pilot effort at investigating the potential DDIs and optimal initial dosage of quetiapine in schizophrenic patients based on PPK. The initial dosages of quetiapine administered to the patients were optimized according to the coadministration of fluvoxamine or duloxetine.

Quetiapine is a second-generation atypical antipsychotic drug that has been commonly prescribed for the treatment of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (depression), and other psychological disorders. Targeted inhibition of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide gated (HCN) channels, which generate Ih, may provide effective resistance against schizophrenia and depression. We investigated if HCN channels could contribute to the therapeutic effect of quetiapine, and its major active metabolite norquetiapine. Two-electrode voltage clamp recordings were used to assess the effects of quetiapine and its active metabolites 7-hydroxyquetiapine and norquetiapine on currents from HCN1 channels expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Norquetiapine, but not quetiapine nor 7-hydroxyquetiapine, has an inhibitory effect on HCN1 channels. Norquetiapine selectively inhibited HCN1 currents by shifting the voltage-dependence of activation to more hyperpolarized potentials in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 13.9 ± 0.8 μM for HCN1 and slowing channel opening, without changing the kinetics of closing. Inhibition by norquetiapine primarily occurs from in the closed state. Norquetiapine inhibition is not sensitive to the external potassium concentration, and therefore, likely does not block the pore. Norquetiapine inhibition also does not dependent on the cyclic-nucleotide binding domain. Norquetiapine also inhibited HCN4 channels with reduced efficacy than HCN1 and had no effect on HCN2 channels. Therefore, HCN channels are key targets of norquetiapine, the primary active metabolite of quetiapine. These data help to explain the therapeutic mechanisms by which quetiapine aids in the treatment of anxiety, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, and may represent a novel structure for future drug design of HCN inhibitors.

Objective: The study retrospectively evaluated the effects of quetiapine on sleep in primary insomnia and neurodegenerative diseases using polysomnographic data. Materials and Methods: Between January 1, 2010, and June 1, 2023, the records of 49 patients who were followed up in the sleep outpatient clinic of the neurology department of our hospital and who underwent polysomnography examination were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with primary insomnia and neurodegenerative diseases were included in the study. Results: The mean age of 49 patients (26 females and 23 males) were 56.67 years. The mean quetiapine dose was 59.37. Sleep latency, stage 1 (N1) duration, stage 2 (N2) duration, mean and minimum SO2 and apnea-hypopnea index were similar. Total sleep duration, stage 3 (N3) duration and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep duration were higher in neurodegenerative patients. N3 duration was shorter in patients with primary insomnia on quetiapine. Sleep duration and REM duration were longer in the neurodegenerative group and sleep latency was longer in primary insomnia in quetiapine users. Among quetiapine users, the N2 sleep percentage was higher and the nonREM 3 sleep percentage was lower in primary insomnia, whereas there was no difference in sleep percentages in neurodegenerative patients. Conclusion: Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent. It shortens sleep latency and decreases the percentage of REM sleep and wake time. It increases total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and N2 sleep. In this study, in primary insomnia patients using quetiapine, N3 sleep duration was shorter and sleep percentage was lower, whereas N2 sleep percentage was longer. There has been no placebo-controlled study of any antipsychotic drug for treating insomnia.

Background: It is unclear how primary care physicians manage insomnia after the introduction of novel hypnotics such as orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists. This Web-based questionnaire survey aimed to examine treatment strategies for insomnia in Japanese primary care practice. Methods: One-hundred-and-seventeen primary care physicians were surveyed on the familiarity of each management option for insomnia on a binary response scale (0 = "unfamiliar"; 1 = "familiar") and how they managed insomnia using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "I never prescribe/perform it"; 9 = "I often prescribe/perform it"). Physicians who were unfamiliar with a management option were deemed to have never prescribed or performed it. Results: Regarding medication, most physicians were familiar with novel hypnotics. Suvorexant was the most used hypnotic, followed by lemborexant and ramelteon. These novel hypnotics averaged 4.8–5.4 points and 4.0–4.7 points for sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia, respectively. By contrast, most benzodiazepines were seldom used below two points. Regarding psychotherapy, only approximately 40% of the physicians were familiar with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and they rarely implemented it, at an average of 1.5–1.6 points. More physicians were familiar with single-component psychotherapies (i.e., relaxation, sleep restriction therapy, and stimulus control) compared to CBT-I, and 48–74% of them implemented it slightly more often, with scores ranging from 2.6 to 3.4 points. Conclusion: This study suggests that Japanese primary care physicians seldom use CBT-I to treat insomnia. In addition, they use novel sleep medications more frequently than benzodiazepines in terms of pharmacotherapy. The use and availability of CBT-I in Japanese primary care might be facilitated by: educating primary care physicians, implementing brief or digital CBT-I, and/or developing collaborations between primary care physicians and CBT-I specialists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quetiapine monotherapy is recommended as the first-line option for acute mania and acute bipolar depression. However, the mechanism of action of quetiapine is unclear. Network pharmacology and molecular docking were employed to determine the molecular mechanisms of quetiapine bidirectional regulation of bipolar depression and mania. Putative target genes for quetiapine were collected from the GeneCard, SwissTargetPrediction, and DrugBank databases. Targets for bipolar depression and bipolar mania were identified from the DisGeNET and GeneCards databases. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was generated using the String database and imported into Cytoscape. DAVID and the Bioinformatics platform were employed to perform the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses of the top 15 core targets. The drug-pathway-target-disease network was constructed using Cytoscape. Finally, molecular docking was performed to evaluate the interactions between quetiapine and potential targets. Targets for quetiapine actions against bipolar depression (126 targets) and bipolar mania (81 targets) were identified. Based on PPI and KEGG pathway analyses, quetiapine may affect bipolar depression by targeting the MAPK and PI3K/AKT insulin signaling pathways via BDNF, INS, EGFR, IGF1, and NGF, and it may affect bipolar mania by targeting the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction signaling pathway via HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, DRD2, and GRIN2B. Molecular docking revealed good binding affinity between quetiapine and potential targets. Pharmacological experiments should be conducted to verify and further explore these results. Our findings suggest that quetiapine affects bipolar depression and bipolar mania through distinct biological core targets, and thus through different mechanisms. Furthermore, our results provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of quetiapine and possible directions for new drug development. • Quetiapine affects bipolar depression and bipolar mania through different mechanisms. • Quetiapine affects depression by targeting MAPK and PI3K/AKT insulin signaling pathways via BDNF, INS, EGFR, IGF1, NGF. • Quetiapine affects mania through neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway via HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, DRD2, GRIN2B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Lamotrigine was previously reported to reduce serum concentration of quetiapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lamotrigine dose or quetiapine formulation was of importance for the drug interaction. Methods: Patients combining lamotrigine with quetiapine (cases) were included retrospectively from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, as were a control group of patients using quetiapine without any interacting drugs. The case and control groups were divided into groups using immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) quetiapine. The case group was further split into high-dose (> 200 mg/day) and low-dose (≤ 200 mg/day) lamotrigine users. Quetiapine concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (MPR) were compared between the control group and dose-separated case groups using ANOVA test and t-tests. Results: In total, 406 patients were included. The mean C/D ratio of IR quetiapine was 46% lower in the high-dose lamotrigine group compared with the control group (P < 0.001), while no interaction effect was present in the low dose lamotrigine group (P = 0.7). Regardless of lamotrigine dose, there was no difference in quetiapine C/D ratio for patients using the XR formulation (P = 0.4). The quetiapine MPR was unaffected regardless of formulation and lamotrigine dose (P ≥ 0.06). Conclusion: The effect of lamotrigine in reducing quetiapine concentration is only significant for patients using quetiapine IR tablets who are treated with lamotrigine doses > 200 mg/day. Because of high variability in the interaction effect, TDM of quetiapine should be recommended during co-prescription of high-dose lamotrigine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study retrospectively evaluated the effects of quetiapine on sleep in primary insomnia and neurodegenerative diseases using polysomnographic data. Materials and Methods: Between January 1, 2010, and June 1, 2023, the records of 49 patients who were followed up in the sleep outpatient clinic of the neurology department of our hospital and who underwent polysomnography examination were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with primary insomnia and neurodegenerative diseases were included in the study. Results: The mean age of 49 patients (26 females and 23 males) were 56.67 years. The mean quetiapine dose was 59.37. Sleep latency, stage 1 (N1) duration, stage 2 (N2) duration, mean and minimum SO2 and apnea-hypopnea index were similar. Total sleep duration, stage 3 (N3) duration and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep duration were higher in neurodegenerative patients. N3 duration was shorter in patients with primary insomnia on quetiapine. Sleep duration and REM duration were longer in the neurodegenerative group and sleep latency was longer in primary insomnia in quetiapine users. Among quetiapine users, the N2 sleep percentage was higher and the nonREM 3 sleep percentage was lower in primary insomnia, whereas there was no difference in sleep percentages in neurodegenerative patients. Conclusion: Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent. It shortens sleep latency and decreases the percentage of REM sleep and wake time. It increases total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and N2 sleep. In this study, in primary insomnia patients using quetiapine, N3 sleep duration was shorter and sleep percentage was lower, whereas N2 sleep percentage was longer. There has been no placebo-controlled study of any antipsychotic drug for treating insomnia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice. Objectives: We aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in delirium management with regard to best-practice recommendations. Primary outcomes investigated were prevalence of use, antipsychotic type, dosage and clinical indication. Methods: Eligibility criteria: studies of any design that examined antipsychotic use to manage delirium in adults in critical care, acute care, palliative care, rehabilitation, and aged care were included. Studies of patients in acute psychiatric care, with psychiatric illness or pre-existing antipsychotic use were excluded. Information sources: we searched five health databases on 16 August, 2023 (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest Health and Medical Collection) using MeSH terms and relevant keywords, including 'delirium' and 'antipsychotic'. Risk of bias: as no included studies were randomised controlled trials, all studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Synthesis of results: descriptive data were extracted in Covidence and synthesised in Microsoft Excel. Results: Included studies: 39 studies published between March 2004 and August 2023 from 13 countries (n = 1,359,519 patients). Most study designs were retrospective medical record audits (n = 16). Synthesis of results: in 18 studies, participants' mean age was ≥65 years (77.79, ±5.20). Palliative care had the highest average proportion of patients with delirium managed with antipsychotics (70.87%, ±33.81%); it was lower and varied little between intensive care unit (53.53%, ±19.73%) and non-intensive care unit settings [medical, surgical and any acute care wards] (56.93%, ±26.44%) and was lowest in in-patient rehabilitation (17.8%). Seventeen different antipsychotics were reported on. In patients aged ≥65 years, haloperidol was the most frequently used and at higher than recommended mean daily doses (2.75 mg, ±2.21 mg). Other antipsychotics commonly administered were olanzapine (mean 11 mg, ±8.54 mg), quetiapine (mean 64.23 mg, ±43.20 mg) and risperidone (mean 0.97 mg, ±0.64 mg). Conclusions: The use of antipsychotics to manage delirium is strongly discouraged in international guidelines. Antipsychotic use in delirium care is a risk for adverse health outcomes and a longer duration of delirium, especially in older people. However, this study has provided evidence that clinicians continue to use antipsychotics for delirium management, the dose, frequency and duration of which are often outside evidence-based guideline recommendations. Clinicians continue to choose antipsychotics to manage delirium symptoms to settle agitation and maintain patient and staff safety, particularly in situations where workload pressures are high. Sustained efforts are needed at the individual, team and organisational levels to educate, train and support clinicians to prioritise non-pharmacological interventions early before deciding to use antipsychotics. This could prevent delirium and avert escalation in behavioural symptoms that often lead to antipsychotic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to verify the real‐world efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumarate extended‐release tablets (Bipresso® 50 mg and 150 mg; marketing authorization holder is KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in patients with bipolar depression. Methods: We performed a post‐marketing surveillance with an observation period of 12 weeks. Results: In the safety analysis group (n = 345), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 111 patients (32.17%). The most common ADRs (>1%) were somnolence in 55 patients (15.94%), akathisia in 11 (3.19%), dizziness in 10 (2.90%), weight increase in 6 (1.74%), thirst in 5 (1.45%), and hypersomnia, constipation, and nausea in 4 patients each (1.16%). The only severe ADR was one patient of suicidal ideation, and "longer time since the onset of the first episode" (p = 0.011) and "presence of complications" (p < 0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs. In the efficacy analysis group (n = 265), the average changes from baseline in the total Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score were −7.3 ± 8.8, −12.2 ± 10.7, −16.8 ± 12.7, and −13.2 ± 12.7 points after 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and at the last evaluation, respectively. The mean MADRS total score decrease had no significant association with maximum daily dose, diagnosis, and presence or absence of prior or concomitant treatment for bipolar disorder with mood stabilizers/antipsychotics/antidepressants. Conclusion: The efficacy of quetiapine fumarate extended‐release tablets was confirmed in clinical practice, and no new safety concerns or risks were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]