Search

Objective: Organophosphates are the insecticides commonly used worldwide. Inadequate treatment in organophosphates poisoning increases morbidity, and mortality. Purpose of the work was to determine the effect of standard treatment alone versus standard treatment plus plasmapheresis on the levels of serum pseudo-cholinesterase, and erythrocyte acetyl cholinesterase in severe patients with organophosphates poisoning. Material and Method: This research is a prospective study. Patients diagnosed with organophosphates poisoning were included in the work. The patients were divided into two groups as the intervention group, and the standard group. The intervention group, plasmapheresis was performed in addition to the standard treatment. Results: The research was conducted with forty cases. (Intervention group n:21, standard group n:19). Serum pseudo-cholinesterase values were 482.5 u/L at baseline, 3723 u/L after plasmapheresis. Erythrocyte acetyl cholinesterase values were 1.91 u/mL on admission, 2.53 u/mL after plasmapheresis. Erythrocyte acetyl cholinesterase and serum pseudo-cholinesterase values were compared between the two groups daily from the admission of patients to intensive care units during the first 5 days, and on the last day in the intensive care units. There was no statistical difference between two groups (p gt; 0.05), except for the second day. It was observed that there was a statistically significant difference between the pseudo-cholinesterase values in the second day comparison of both groups (p=0.028). Conclusion: In conclusion, plasmapheresis treatment may contribute positively to pseudo-cholinesterase level. This treatment may have provided additional time for the organophosphates to be eliminated from the body. Although acetyl cholinesterase reactivation is achieved with oxime treatment, the clinical effect of this treatment is not clear.

Objective: Organophosphates are the insecticides commonly used worldwide. Inadequate treatment for organophosphates poisoning increases morbidity, and mortality. Purpose of the work was to determine the effect of standard treatment alone versus standard treatment plus plasmapheresis on the levels of serum pseudo-cholinesterase, and erythrocyte acetyl cholinesterase in severe patients with organophosphates poisoning. Material and Method: This research is a prospective study. Patients diagnosed with organophosphates poisoning were included in the work. The patients were divided into two groups as the intervention group, and the standard group. The intervention group, plasmapheresis was performed in addition to the standard treatment. Results: The research was conducted with forty cases. (Intervention group n=21, standard group n=19). Serum pseudo-cholinesterase values were 482.5 u/L at baseline, 3723 u/L after plasmapheresis. Erythrocyte acetyl cholinesterase values were 1.91 u/mL on admission, 2.53 u/mL after plasmapheresis. Erythrocyte acetyl cholinesterase and serum pseudo-cholinesterase values were compared between the two groups daily from the admission of patients to intensive care units during the first 5 days, and on the last day in the intensive care units. There was no statistical difference between two groups (p> 0.05), except for the second day. It was observed that there was a statistically significant difference between the pseudo-cholinesterase values in the second day comparison of both groups (p=0.028). Conclusion: In conclusion, plasmapheresis treatment may contribute positively to pseudo-cholinesterase level. This treatment may have provided additional time for the organophosphates to be eliminated from the body. Although acetyl cholinesterase reactivation is achieved with oxime treatment, the clinical effect of this treatment is not clear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Organophosphorus poisoning (OPP) is a major global public health problem. Pralidoxime has been used in a complimentary role to atropine for the management of OPP. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of pralidoxime but studies regarding its role have been inconclusive, ranging from being ineffective to harmful or beneficial. Materials and Methods: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of pralidoxime. Eddleston′s study was the most compelling factor for our study, as he showed worst outcomes using pralidoxime. Our practice of continuous use of pralidoxime was based on the WHO guidelines and the study by Pawar (2006), which showed better outcome with higher doses of pralidoxime. These conflicting results suggested that a re-evaluation of its use in our clinical practice was indicated. Results: There was no difference in mortality rates, hemodynamic parameters and atropine requirements between the AP and A groups. Mean duration of ventilation (3.6 ± 4.6 in AP group vs. 3.6 ± 4.4 in A group) and Intensive Care Unit stay (7.1 ± 5.4 in AP group vs. 6.8 ± 4.7 in A group) was comparable. Serum sodium concentrations showed a correlation with mortality, with lower concentrations associated with better outcomes. Conclusion: The study suggests that add-on WHO-recommended pralidoxime therapy does not provide any benefit over atropine monotherapy. Adding pralidoxime does not seem to be beneficial and at the same time does not result in increased mortality rates. Our practice changed after completion of this study, and it has proven to be of significant benefit to patients who had to bear the expense of treatment.

Background: Organophosphorus poisoning (OPP) is a major global public health problem. Pralidoxime has been used in a complimentary role to atropine for the management of OPP. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of pralidoxime but studies regarding its role have been inconclusive, ranging from being ineffective to harmful or beneficial. Materials and Methods: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of pralidoxime. Eddleston’s study was the most compelling factor for our study, as he showed worst outcomes using pralidoxime. Our practice of continuous use of pralidoxime was based on the WHO guidelines and the study by Pawar (2006), which showed better outcome with higher doses of pralidoxime. These conflicting results suggested that a re-evaluation of its use in our clinical practice was indicated. Results: There was no difference in mortality rates, hemodynamic parameters and atropine requirements between the AP and A groups. Mean duration of ventilation (3.6 ± 4.6 in AP group vs. 3.6 ± 4.4 in A group) and Intensive Care Unit stay (7.1 ± 5.4 in AP group vs. 6.8 ± 4.7 in A group) was comparable. Serum sodium concentrations showed a correlation with mortality, with lower concentrations associated with better outcomes. Conclusion: The study suggests that add-on WHO-recommended pralidoxime therapy does not provide any benefit over atropine monotherapy. Adding pralidoxime does not seem to be beneficial and at the same time does not result in increased mortality rates. Our practice changed after completion of this study, and it has proven to be of significant benefit to patients who had to bear the expense of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]