Search

For the precise preoperative evaluation of complex congenital heart diseases (CHDs) with reduced radiation dose exposure, we assessed the diagnostic validity and reliability of low-dose prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT). Forty-two individuals with complex CHDs who underwent preoperative CCT as part of a prospective study were included. Each CCT image was examined independently by two radiologists. The primary reference for assessing the diagnostic validity of the CCT was the post-operative data. Infants and neonates were the most common age group suffering from complex CHDs. The mean volume of the CT dose index was 1.44 ± 0.47 mGy, the mean value of the dose-length product was 14.13 ± 5.4 mGy*cm, and the mean value of the effective radiation dose was 0.58 ± 0.13 mSv. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the low-dose prospective ECG-gated CCT for identifying complex CHDs were 95.6%, 98%, 97%, 97%, and 97% for reader 1 and 92.6%, 97%, 95.5%, 95.1%, and 95.2% for reader 2, respectively. The overall inter-reader agreement for interpreting the cardiac CCTs was good (κ = 0.74). According to the results of our investigation, low-dose prospective ECG-gated CCT is a useful and trustworthy method for assessing coronary arteries and making a precise preoperative diagnosis of complex CHDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy of prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT at 70 kV and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), with a single source, 512 slice MDCT in the diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease in infants. We retrospectively evaluated 47 infants (ages 1 day to 353 days) with prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT that was performed on a single source 512 slice CT at low tube voltage (70 kV) using a wide detector aperture, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASIR), and specific reconstruction software reducing coronary motion artifacts (SnapShot Freeze). All cardiac images were obtained during the first pass of contrast material through the anatomic structures of interest and the targets for the center of the acquisition window were set 45% of the R-R interval during one cardiac cycle without sedation and breath-hold. The median effective dose measured in our study was 0.64 ± 0.16 mSv. The average subjective overall image quality score was 4.34 ± 0.31 (range 3–5). For the determination of objective image quality, Mean Noise (HU), SNR, and CNR values ​​emerged as 20.8, 28.7(for pulmonary artery), and 27.1, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 100% for the main purposes for the main clinical indication. During cardiac CT examination, pathologies in addition to cardiac anomalies were found in 9/47 of cases (7 severe airway obstructions,1 posterior diaphragmatic hernia, 1 vertebral anomaly). Prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT scan at 70 kV and ASIR in infants with complex CHD provides low radiation dose (submillisievert) in a single heartbeat with a good objective and subjective image quality. It also provides important benefits in the diagnosis of additional pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the precise preoperative evaluation of complex congenital heart diseases (CHDs) with reduced radiation dose exposure, we assessed the diagnostic validity and reliability of low-dose prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT). Forty-two individuals with complex CHDs who underwent preoperative CCT as part of a prospective study were included. Each CCT image was examined independently by two radiologists. The primary reference for assessing the diagnostic validity of the CCT was the post-operative data. Infants and neonates were the most common age group suffering from complex CHDs. The mean volume of the CT dose index was 1.44 ± 0.47 mGy, the mean value of the dose-length product was 14.13 ± 5.4 mGy*cm, and the mean value of the effective radiation dose was 0.58 ± 0.13 mSv. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the low-dose prospective ECG-gated CCT for identifying complex CHDs were 95.6%, 98%, 97%, 97%, and 97% for reader 1 and 92.6%, 97%, 95.5%, 95.1%, and 95.2% for reader 2, respectively. The overall inter-reader agreement for interpreting the cardiac CCTs was good (κ = 0.74). According to the results of our investigation, low-dose prospective ECG-gated CCT is a useful and trustworthy method for assessing coronary arteries and making a precise preoperative diagnosis of complex CHDs.

The updated National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines of 2017 state that new generation cardiac CT scanners (Aquilion ONE, Brilliance iCT, Discovery CT750 HD and Somatom Definition Flash) are recommended as an option for first-line imaging of the coronary arteries in people with suspected stable coronary artery disease (with an estimated likelihood of coronary artery disease of 10–29%) in whom imaging with earlier generation CT scanners is difficult. New generation cardiac CT scanners are also recommended as an option for first-line evaluation of disease progression, to establish need for revascularisation in people with known coronary artery disease in whom imaging with earlier generation CT scanners is difficult. CT scanning might not be necessary in situations in which immediate revascularisation is being considered. The European Society of Cardiology 2019 clinical practice guidelines recommend non-invasive functional imaging for myocardial ischaemia or coronary CT angiography (CTA) as the initial test to diagnose CAD in symptomatic patients in whom obstructive CAD cannot be excluded by clinical assessment alone. Given increased computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTCA) utilisation, radiation dose, contrast enhancement and image quality of prospective ECG-gated CTCA between 256-slice single-source and 192x2-slice dual-source CT scanners were retrospectively evaluated. Prospectively gated CTCA data from 63 patients on a 256-slice CT (group A) and 71 patients on a 192x2-slice dual source CT (group B) from January to December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated respectively. Scanner-reported dose length product values were used with a conversion factor (k = 0.014 mSv/mGy x cm) to estimate effective dose. Contrast enhancement was assessed with mean CT attenuation at selected regions of interest on axial coronary images. Image quality of the coronary arteries was assessed by a 4-point grading score (1 = non-diagnostic, 4 = excellent image quality). The radiation doses in group B were significantly lower than group A (3.68 + 2.13 mSv versus 4.81 + 1.56 mSv, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in contrast enhancement in the left coronary artery, proximal right coronary artery and left ventricular wall for both groups. Vessel image quality scores for group B were higher than group A (right coronary artery (RCA): 3.2 + 0.7 versus 2.4 + 0.7, p < 0.001; left anterior descending (LAD) artery: 3.0 + 0.8 vs 2.5 + 0.6, p < 0.001; left circumflex (LCx) artery: 3.3 + 0.7 vs 2.6 + 0.6, p < 0.001). Coronary artery contour scores for group B were significantly higher than group A (RCA: 3.2 + 0.8 versus 2.3 + 0.7, p < 0.001; LAD: 3.0 + 0.7 versus 2.4 + 0.6, p < 0.001; LCx: 3.3 + 0.6 versus 2.5 + 0.6, p < 0.001). Prospective ECG-gated CTCA performed on 192x2-slice CT results in better image quality and lower radiation dose than 256-slice CT. There were no significant differences in contrast enhancement in left main coronary artery (LMCA), proximal RCA and left ventricular wall in both groups. In institutions with both 256-slice and 192x2-slice CT scanners, we recommend that CTCAs be preferentially performed using the 192x2-slice CT scanner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a reliable imaging tool to evaluate children congenital heart disease (CHD) but requires radiation exposure. This study aims to investigate image quality and radiation dose with a prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 80 multi-slice CTA, in 182 consecutive children examinations with CHD. In total, 182 consecutive examinations performed with a prospective ECG-gated 80 multi-slice CTA from March 2016 to December 2017 in Nantes university hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Radiation dose was assessed by dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (E). Objective quality image was assessed by contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Subjective quality image was assessed by two radiologists with a 10-point scale evaluating visualization of coronary arteries. Correlation between quality image, radiation dose, age, weight, heart rate was analyzed. DLP and E were 29.3 ± 15.5 mGy.cm and 0.6 ± 0.2 mSv, respectively. Agreement between radiologists in assessment of subjective image quality was 0.79. Subjective image quality score was significantly better (P < 0.01) with higher age, weight, DLP and lower heart rate in univariate analysis. CNR was significantly lower with increasing weight and DLP (P < 0.05) but there was no correlation between CNR and age and heart rate. Prospective ECG-gated 80 multi-slice CTA is performing for the evaluation of children CHD with good image quality and low radiation dose. Visualization of small structures is better when age and weight increase, heart rate decreases and when radiation dose is more important. CNR evolves in the opposite side to subjective image quality score. It seems less appropriate to assess image quality from clinical viewpoint of the radiologist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]