Search

Objective: To compare ultrasound‐assessed fetal head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), HC/AC ratio, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) in prediction of large‐for‐gestational‐age (LGA) at birth in pregnancies affected by type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all women with T1DM and T2DM giving birth to singletons between 2010 and 2019 at Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark. Ultrasound scans were performed at 16, 20, 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. LGA was defined as birth weight deviation of 15% or greater from the expected for gestational age (≥90th centile). Prediction of LGA was assessed by logistic regression adjusted for maternal characteristics and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: Among 180 T1DM pregnancies, 118 (66%) had an LGA neonate at birth. At 28 weeks of pregnancy, they were predicted with AUCHC/AC = 0.67, AUCAC = 0.85, and AUCEFW = 0.86. The multivariate analysis did not improve the predictive performance of the HC/AC ratio or AC. Among 87 T2DM pregnancies, 36 (41%) had an LGA neonate at birth. At 28 weeks, they were predicted with AUCHC/AC = 0.73, AUCAC = 0.83, and AUCEFW = 0.87. In T2DM, the multivariate analysis significantly improved the predictive performance for both HC/AC ratio and AC from 20 weeks of pregnancy. Conclusion: In T1DM and T2DM pregnancies, LGA is characterized by a general fetal overgrowth including both AC and HC. Therefore, AC and EFW perform better than the HC/AC ratio in the prediction of LGA. In T2DM, as opposed to T1DM, the predictive performance was improved by the inclusion of maternal characteristics and HbA1c in the analysis. Synopsis: In pregnancies involving type 1 and type 2 diabetes, estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference are superior to head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio, in predicting large‐for‐gestational‐age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes distress has been shown to be highly prevalent in adults living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with important implications for glycemic control, self-care, and self-management behaviors. Despite considerable focus on self-management and glycemic targets during pregnancy, current literature lacks information on diabetes distress in pregnancy, particularly in women with type 2 diabetes. This article outlines an explanatory sequential mixed methods research protocol to examine diabetes distress during pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes. The aims of the study were to: (1) establish the prevalence and correlates of diabetes distress in women attending a diabetes and pregnancy clinic; (2) use this quantitative data to inform development of an interview guide and plan for sampling for telephone interviews; and (3) explore and describe the experiences of diabetes distress during pregnancy. The quantitative strand was a cross-sectional survey of 76 women using self-reported questionnaires to collect demographic and clinical data, and validated tools to assess health variables, including the outcome of interest of diabetes distress using the Problem Area in Diabetes scale. The qualitative strand applied interpretive description methodology to explore the quantitative results using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 18 women to obtain patient perspectives of diabetes distress and experiences of managing diabetes in pregnancy. The explanatory sequential mixed methods research will provide an opportunity to add contextual qualitative experiences from women with pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy to provide a comprehensive picture of diabetes distress. The results will inform further research priorities that protect and promote mental health, psychosocial well-being, and self-management practices for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbimortality. Dietetic, phenotypic, and genotypic factors influencing HDP were analyzed during a nutrigenetic trial in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2016–2020). Pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (n = 70) were randomly assigned to a traditional or DASH diet group. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured during prenatal visits and HDP were diagnosed using international criteria. Phenotypic data were obtained from medical records and personal interviews. Genotyping for FTO and ADRB2 polymorphisms used RT-PCR. Linear mixed-effect models and time-to-event analyses were performed. The variables with significant effect on the risk for progression to HDP were: black skin color (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 8.63, p = 0.01), preeclampsia in previous pregnancy (aHR 11.66, p < 0.01), SBP ≥ 114 mmHg in the third trimester (aHR 5.56, p 0.04), DBP ≥ 70 mmHg in the first trimester (aHR 70.15, p = 0.03), mean blood pressure > 100 mmHg (aHR 18.42, p = 0.03), and HbA1c ≥ 6.41% in the third trimester (aHR 4.76, p = 0.03). Dietetic and genotypic features had no significant effect on the outcome, although there was limited statistical power to test both. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this work was to investigate the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) following a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pre-existing diabetes among Aboriginal women in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia. Methods: We undertook a longitudinal study of linked healthcare datasets. All Aboriginal women who gave birth between 2000 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Diabetes status in the index pregnancy was as recorded in the NT Perinatal Data Collection. Outcomes included any stage of CKD and ESKD as defined by ICD-10 coding in the NT Hospital Inpatient Activity dataset between 2000 and 2018. Risk was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Among 10,508 Aboriginal women, the mean age was 23.1 (SD 6.1) years; 731 (7.0%) had GDM and 239 (2.3%) had pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy. Median follow-up was 12.1 years. Compared with women with no diabetes during pregnancy, women with GDM had increased risk of CKD (9.2% vs 2.2%, adjusted HR 5.2 [95% CI 3.9, 7.1]) and ESKD (2.4% vs 0.4%, adjusted HR 10.8 [95% CI 5.6, 20.8]). Among women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy, 29.1% developed CKD (adjusted HR 10.9 [95% CI 7.7, 15.4]) and 9.9% developed ESKD (adjusted HR 28.0 [95% CI 13.4, 58.6]). Conclusions/interpretation: Aboriginal women in the NT with GDM or pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy are at high risk of developing CKD and ESKD. Pregnancy presents an important opportunity to identify kidney disease risk. Strategies to prevent kidney disease and address the social determinants of health are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pregnancy is a risk factor for the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in women with pre‐gestational diabetes. However, a minority of pregnant women with diabetes adhere to retinal screening recommendations. The introduction of an onsite retinal camera at our tertiary maternity hospital significantly increased the proportion of women who received at least one retinal screen during pregnancy (93.0% vs 54.3%, P < 0.001) and the identification of both DR and DR progression. We conclude that the use of a retinal camera in similar clinics is a feasible option to improve DR screening and diagnosis rates in pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbimortality. Dietetic, phenotypic, and genotypic factors influencing HDP were analyzed during a nutrigenetic trial in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2016–2020). Pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (n = 70) were randomly assigned to a traditional or DASH diet group. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured during prenatal visits and HDP were diagnosed using international criteria. Phenotypic data were obtained from medical records and personal interviews. Genotyping for FTO and ADRB2 polymorphisms used RT-PCR. Linear mixed-effect models and time-to-event analyses were performed. The variables with significant effect on the risk for progression to HDP were: black skin color (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 8.63, p = 0.01), preeclampsia in previous pregnancy (aHR 11.66, p < 0.01), SBP ≥ 114 mmHg in the third trimester (aHR 5.56, p 0.04), DBP ≥ 70 mmHg in the first trimester (aHR 70.15, p = 0.03), mean blood pressure > 100 mmHg (aHR 18.42, p = 0.03), and HbA1c ≥ 6.41% in the third trimester (aHR 4.76, p = 0.03). Dietetic and genotypic features had no significant effect on the outcome, although there was limited statistical power to test both.

Aims: To examine maternal fear of hypoglycaemia, glycaemia and pregnancy outcomes in women with impaired and normal awareness of hypoglycaemia. Methods: A pre‐planned sub‐study of 214 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes who participated in the CONCEPTT trial. Participants completed hypoglycaemia fear surveys (HFS‐II) at baseline. Logistic regression and Poisson regression analyses were used to obtain an adjusted estimate for the rate ratio relating awareness to the number of severe hypoglycaemic episodes, and for several neonatal outcomes in relation to the total HFS‐II score. The role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use was examined. Results: Overall, 30% of participants reported impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (n = 64). Women with impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia had more episodes of severe hypoglycaemia (mean 0.44 vs. 0.08, p < 0.001) (12–34 weeks gestation) and scored higher on the HFS‐II scale (43.7 vs. 36.0, p 0.008), indicating more fear of hypoglycaemia. They spent more time below range (CGM <3.5 mmol/L) and exhibited more glycaemic variability at 12 weeks gestation. Higher overall HFS‐II scores were associated with a higher risk of maternal severe hypoglycaemia episodes (Rate Ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.39–2.27). Women with impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia had less maternal weight gain but there were no differences in neonatal outcomes between women with impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and normal hypoglycaemia awareness. Higher HFS‐II scores were associated with more nephropathy (Odds Ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.06–3.4). CGM use after 12 weeks was not associated with the number of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49–1.15; p = 0.18). Conclusions: In pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia is associated with more maternal severe hypoglycaemia episodes and more fear of hypoglycaemia. Having impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and/or fear of hypoglycaemia should alert clinicians to this increased risk. Reassuringly, there was no increase in adverse neonatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Associations of acute glycemic complications with season and ambient temperature have been reported in general population with diabetes. However, little is known about the risks of acute glycemic complications in relation to season and ambient temperature in pregnant women, who are likely to be even more vulnerable. This work aimed to investigate the associations of season and ambient temperature with pregnancies complicated with hyperglycemia emergency or severe hypoglycemia. Methods: Two separate case-control studies were nested within 150,153 pregnancies by women with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes between 2009 and 2014 in Taiwan. Hyperglycemia emergency (mainly diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state) and severe hypoglycemia occurred in 77 and 153 diabetic pregnancies (cases), respectively. Ten control pregnancies were randomly selected for each case by matching each case pregnancy on type of diabetes (i.e., T1DM, T2DM, or GDM), maternal age on the date of acute glycemic complication occurrence (i.e., index date), and “length of gestation at risk” (i.e., period between conception and index date). Meteorological parameters were retrieved from 542 meteorological monitoring stations across Taiwan during 2008–2014. Conditional logistic regression analysis with generalized estimation equation was separately performed to estimate the covariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of each of the two acute glycemic complications in association with season and ambient temperature within 30 days prior to the index date. Results: Compared to summer, winter season was associated with a significantly elevated risk of severe hypoglycemia with an OR of 1.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–2.79). The OR of hyperglycemic emergency was also elevated in winter season at OR of 1.88, but the significance is only marginal (95% CI 0.97–3.64, p = 0.0598). Subgroup analyses further noted that such seasonal variation was also observed in pregnancies with pre-pregnancy type 1 diabetes and gestational diabetes. On the other hand, ambient temperature was not significantly associated with the two acute glycemic complications. Conclusions: A moderately but significantly elevated risk of severe hypoglycemia was found in pregnant women with diabetes during winter season, and such increased risk was more evident in pregnancies with T1DM.

The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) criteria have been heavily scrutinised with concerns that the consequent GDM prevalence increase has not been associated with improved perinatal outcomes. At a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia we aimed to evaluate prevalence trends for GDM, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), maternal obesity and large-for-gestational age (LGA) and assess changes in perinatal outcomes following IADPSG criteria uptake in 2015. A retrospective cohort study of singleton births from 20 weeks' gestation was conducted between 1st January 2011 and 31st December 2020. Maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes were extracted from medical records. 52,795 pregnancies were included. GDM prevalence increased 2.7 times from 8.9% in 2011 to 23.7% in 2020 and increased annually by 8.59% (95%CI 7.77, 9.42). The rate of T2DM increased annually by 11.69% (95%CI 7.72, 16.67). Obesity prevalence increased annually by 3.18% (95%CI 2.58, 3.78). Induction of labour (IOL) prevalence increased annually by 8.35% (95%CI 5.69, 11.06). LGA prevalence remained unchanged. Increasing maternal obesity was the major contributing factor for LGA prevalence. From 2011 to 2020 GDM, obesity and T2DM prevalence increased significantly, with associated increased IOL, without change in LGA rates. Prospective studies are required to explore interactions between GDM, obesity, LGA and obstetric interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJETIVO: identificar e descrever a prevalência de anticorpos antifosfolípides (anticorpo anticardiolipina e anticoagulante lúpico) em gestantes diabéticas. MÉTODOS: estudo prospectivo de prevalência, realizado no período de julho de 2003 a março de 2004. Foram estudadas 56 gestantes diabéticas gestacionais e pré-gestacionais que ingressaram ao pré-natal e aceitaram participar do estudo. Nenhuma gestante foi excluída. Se um ou outro anticorpo estivesse presente, a gestante seria tratada com heparina e ácido acetilsalicílico. Foram caracterizados os perfis da gestante, a evolução da gestação e o recém-nascido. RESULTADOS: foram diagnosticados anticorpos antifosfolípides em apenas quatro gestantes das 56 estudadas, o que representou prevalência de 7% (IC 95% - 0,1-13,9). Nas gestantes diabéticas com anticorpos antifosfolípides a duração do diabetes foi de cinco anos ou mais. A idade variou de 27 a 38 anos, sendo uma primigesta, outra secundigesta e as outras duas multíparas. As gestantes com anticorpos antifosfolípides, que foram tratadas, tiveram recém-nascidos vivos, de termo, cujos pesos variaram entre 2.650 g e 4.000 g. CONCLUSÃO: a prevalência de anticorpos antifosfolípides em gestantes diabéticas gestacionais é baixa, e similar à população geral de grávidas. Está prevalência aumenta quando a gestante é diabética pré-gestacional.PURPOSE: to diagnose and treat diabetic pregnant women with antiphospholipid antibodies and to describe the gestational and perinatal results. METHODS: we evaluated 56 gestational and pregestational diabetic women who were attended at one specialized prenatal care unit, between July 2003 and March 2004. All of them had a blood test to quantify antiphospholipid antibodies. If positive, they were treated with heparin and aspirin at low doses and the usual treatment for diabetes. We calculated the prevalence and 95% confidence interval for all and also those for the pregestational ones. The characteristics of the pregnancies and the newborns are described. RESULTS: antiphospholipid antibodies prevalence among the diabetic pregnant women was 7% (95% CI - 0.1 to 13.9). Among pregestational diabetic women it was 12% (95% CI - 0.2 to 23.3). Among the diabetic women with antiphospholipid antibodies the duration of disease was five years or more. Maternal age in positive antiphospholipid antibodies diabetics ranged from 27 to 38 years; one was primiparous, another was secundiparous and two were multiparous. CONCLUSION: antiphospholipid antibodies prevalence in diabetic pregnant women was similar to that in the general population and lower than that of the pregestational diabetic women.

El estrés oxidativo es un estado que se caracteriza por un desequilibrio entre la producción de especies reactivas del oxígeno y la capacidad antioxidante de las células. La implicación del estrés oxidativo en diversas patologías, ha sido demostrada; entre ellas se encuentran la diabetes mellitus y el embarazo, aunque este último no es un estado patológico sino de adaptación metabólica. En el embarazo se producen modificaciones en el metabolismo de las biomoléculas celulares, en particular en los lípidos y proteínas, junto con modificaciones oxidativas que se incrementan si la embarazada es portadora de diabetes mellitusThe oxidative stress is a state that is characterized by an unbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species and the antioxidant capacity of the cells. The involvement of oxidative stress in different pathologies has been showed in, among others, diabetes mellitus and pregnancy, although the latter is not a pathological state but a state of metabolic adaptation. During pregnancy, there are modifications in the metabolism of cellular biomolecules, particularly in lipids and proteins, together with oxidative modifications that increase if the pregnant woman is a diabetes mellitus carrier

In February 2015 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published new guidance (NG3) on the management of diabetes in pregnancy. Care teams need to be aware of this guidance and implement its recommendations. These include preconception care with target HbA1c 48 mmol/mol. Women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) should have a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Diagnostic criteria for GDM have changed to fasting glucose of 5.6 mmol/L or above or 2 hour glucose of 7.8 mmol/L or above. Glycaemic targets in all diabetic pregnancies have changed to fasting glucose below 5.3 mmol/L (4-5.2 mmol/L if on insulin) and 1 hour postprandial glucose below 7.8 mmol/L if these can be achieved safely. Continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump therapy should not be used routinely but can be used if glycaemic control is problematic. Capillary ketone testing should be routine for women with type 1 diabetes when hyperglycaemic and for all women with diabetes including, GDM when acutely unwell. More flexibility is offered around recommended delivery timing: 37+0 weeks to 38+6 weeks for women with types 1 and 2 diabetes; prior to 40+6 in GDM (and earlier if complications arise). Postnatal testing following GSM should be by fasting glucose (not OGTT) at 6-13 weeks post partum. Testing later than this can use HbA[sub 1c]. Introducing these changes will have resource implications, including a likely increase in the number of women diagnosed with GDM. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2015;15:107-111 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In addition to increasing the risk of adverse birth outcomes, diabetes in pregnancy is thought to be an important driver of the epidemic of type 2 diabetes affecting Canada's First Nations population. The relative contributions of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pre-existing diabetes are not well understood. We generated a comprehensive epidemiological profile of diabetes in pregnancy over a 10-year period among the First Nations population of Alberta, Canada. Methods: De-identified administrative data for 427,058 delivery records were obtained for the years 2000-2009. Pregnancy risk factors and delivery outcomes were described and compared by ethnicity (First Nations vs. non-First Nations) and diabetes status. Age-adjusted prevalence values for GDM and pre-existing diabetes were calculated and were compared by ethnicity. Longitudinal changes over time were also examined. Predictors were explored using logistic regression analysis. Results: First Nations women had more antenatal risk factors and adverse infant outcomes that were compounded by diabetes. First Nations descent was an independent predictor of diabetes in pregnancy (p < 0.001). GDM prevalence was significantly higher among First Nations (6.1%) compared to non-First Nations women (3.8%; p < 0.001), but prevalence values increased significantly over time only in non-First Nations women (4.5 average annual percent change; p < 0.05). The prevalence of pre-existing diabetes was stable over time in both groups, but First Nations women experienced a 2.5-fold higher overall prevalence compared with non-First Nations women (1.5% vs. 0.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although First Nations women experience a higher overall prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy, the lack of increase in the prevalence over time is encouraging. However, because high-risk pregnancies and poor outcomes are more common among First Nations women, particularly those with diabetes, strategies to improve perinatal care must be implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Establishment, progressive development, expansion and organization of Cuba's National Comprehensive Diabetes and Pregnancy Program is described, including changes in related health services since 1959. Currently implemented throughout the country, the Program is supervised by a working group and addresses diabetic women's reproductive health and care during pregnancy. The importance of preconception care for diabetic women is emphasized, as well as the need to increase Program uptake nationally, including screening for gestational diabetes in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is accepted that tight glycaemic control is necessary during labour in women with pregestational or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Although policies vary, routine use of intravenous glucose and insulin remains a standard practice in some institutions. We present a retrospective review of a more conservative approach. Briefly, regardless of planned delivery method, maternal blood sugar level (BSL) is monitored during delivery and only if outside 4–7 mmol/L is action taken. We report the results of an audit of this practice. Methods: A retrospective (August 2001–July 2004) review of 137 singleton, term deliveries of women with diabetes (23 pregestational, 114 GDM). Predetermined outcomes reported were BSL achieved prior to delivery, first neonatal BSL and/or admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for hypoglycaemia. Results: With our management practice, most women had a BSL between 4 and 8 mmol/L prior to delivery (17 (74%) diabetes mellitus (DM), 37 (93%) diet-controlled GDM, 55 (89%) insulin-requiring GDM). Neonatal hypoglycaemia (< 2.6 mmol/L) was common ( n= 30 (22%)). However, most neonatal hypoglycaemia occurred in infants born to mothers with BSL 4–8 mmol/L ( n= 26 (87%)). Neonatal hypoglycaemia requiring NICU admission ( n= 13) was predominantly in infants born to mothers with BSL < 8mmol/L prior to delivery ( n= 10 (77%)). Three of eight maternal BSLs > 8 mmol/L occurred prior to emergency caesarean section in women with pregestational diabetes. Conclusion: These results suggest that our current practice, particularly in women with GDM, may offer an alternative to more aggressive regimes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The prevalence of preterm delivery is considerably elevated in women with type 1 diabetes. The aim of the study was to evaluate haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a predictor of preterm delivery. Two hundred thirteen consecutive pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and normal urinary albumin excretion were included prospectively. HbA1c was analyzed at 10, 20 and 28 weeks of gestation. Seventy-one women (33%) delivered pre term and 142 at term. At 10 weeks of gestation, HbA1c was 7.3% (S.D. 1.0) vs. 6.9% (S.D. 0.9) (P<.01), at 20 weeks of gestation 6.6% (S.D. 0.7) vs. 6.1% (S.D. 0.7) (P<.001) and at 28 weeks of gestation 6.7% (S.D. 0.8) vs. 6.1% (S.D. 0.7) (P<.001). When comparing HbA1c at 10, 20 and 28 weeks of gestation, HbA1c at 28 weeks of gestation (P<.001) was the best predictor of preterm delivery. The adjusted odds ratio per 1% increment in HbA1c at 28 weeks of gestation was 2.8 (95% CI 1.7–4.4). HbA1c at 28 weeks of gestation was a clinical significant predictor of preterm delivery in type 1 diabetes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Collegium Antropologicum is the property of Croatian Anthropological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective To compare antenatal and obstetric costs for multiple pregnancy versus singleton pregnancy risk groups and to identify factors driving cost differentials. Design Observational study over 15 months (2001–02). Setting Four district hospitals in southeast England. Population Consecutive women with multiple pregnancy and singleton women with risk factors for fetal congenital heart disease (CHD) (pregestational diabetes, epilepsy, or family history of CHD) or Down syndrome, and a sample of low-risk singleton women. Methods Clinical care was audited from the second trimester anomaly scan until postnatal discharge, and the resource items were costed. Multiple regression analysis determined predictors of costs. Main outcome measures NHS mean costs of antenatal and obstetric care for different types of pregnancy. Results A total of 959 pregnancies were studied. Three percent of 243 women with multiple pregnancy reached 40 weeks of gestation compared with 54–55% of 163 low-risk and 322 Down syndrome risk women and 36% of 231 cardiac risk women. Antenatal costs for cardiac risk (£1,153) and multiple pregnancy (£1,048) were nearly double the costs for other two groups ( P < 0.001). As 63% of multiple births were delivered by caesarean section, the obstetric cost for multiple pregnancy (£3,393) was £1,000 greater overall. Pregestational diabetes was the most influential factor driving singleton costs, resulting in similar total costs for multiple pregnancy women (£4,442) and for women with diabetes (£4,877). Conclusions Our analyses confirm that multiple pregnancies are substantially more costly than most singleton pregnancies. Identifying women with diabetes as equally costly is pertinent because of the findings of the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health that standards of maternal care for diabetics often are inadequate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/hypothesis: Pregnancy could damage kidney function in diabetic nephropathy. We investigated the long-term impact of pregnancy on the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Methods: Our observational follow-up study included all women patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus who developed diabetic nephropathy between 1970 and 1989 at Steno Diabetes Center (n = 93). Follow-up lasted 16 years (range 3–28) from the onset of diabetic nephropathy until death or the year 2000. A total of 26 women became pregnant after the onset of diabetic nephropathy (group A). The remaining 67 served as control subjects (group B). All patients received aggressive antihypertensive treatment (blood pressure goal < 140/90 mmHg). Results: The two groups were comparable at onset of diabetic nephropathy regarding blood pressure, albuminuria, s-cholesterol, smoking, retinopathy and s-creatinine (mean 79(SD 23) μmol/l). The slopes of 1/s-creatinine (1000 · l ·μmol–1· year–1) during the whole observation period were –0.39(0.40) compared with –0.41(0.70) (group A vs B – NS). The slopes of 1/s-creatinine before and after pregnancy were similar. Decline in creatinine clearance (ml/min/yr) was 3.2 (3.4) compared with 3.2 (5.1) (group A vs B -NS). At the end of follow-up, 35 % (95 %-CI:17–53) of the pregnant women had died and 19 % (7–39) had reached end stage renal disease compared to 34 % (23–45) and 24 %(14–34) of the control subjects, respectively(NS). Group A and B had similar blood pressure levels during the whole observation period: 136(13)/83(7) vs 139 (14)/85(7) mmHg (NS). Conclusion/interpretation: Pregnancy has no adverse long-term impact on kidney function and survival in Type I diabetic patients with well-preserved kidney function (normal serum creatinine) suffering from diabetic nephropathy. [Diabetologia (2002) 45: 36–41] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Systemic disease and hormonal changes have been implicated as complicating factors for periodontal disease. Diabetes has been identified as a risk factor for periodontal disease, and diabetics can experience periodontal destruction at an earlier age than non-diabetic individuals. Increased hormone levels during pregnancy can contribute to increased gingival inflammation. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) on the periodontal status of pregnant women. Methods: Thirty-three (13 diabetic and 20 non-diabetic) subjects, 20 to 39 weeks gestation, participated in this study. The mean age of the diabetics and non-diabetics was 29.5 ± 7.1 (SD) and 27.0 ± 7.3 years, respectively. The following parameters were assessed at Ramfjord's reference teeth: plaque index (PI), gingival inflammation (GI), probing depth (PD), gingival margin (GM) location, and clinical attachment level (CAL). Results: Diabetic subjects had significantly (P<0.001) higher PI (1.4S ± 0.69) and GI (1.77 ± 0.44) scores than non-diabetics (PI = 0.63 ± 0.38; GI = 0.93 ± 0.48). Mean PD for diabetics (2.95 = 0.69 mm) was significantly different (P <0.024) from that of non-diabetics (2.44 ± 0.32 mm). Although mean GM location was coronal to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) in both groups, gingival margins were at a more apical position (P<0.001] in the diabetics (-0.20 ± 1.24 mm) compared to non-diabetics (-1.75 ± 0.53 mm]. Mean CAL values also varied significantly (P<0.001) between diabetics (2.60 ± 1.54 mm) and non-diabetics (0.68 ± 0.65 mm). Significant differences were seen For GI (P<0.001), PD (P = 0.005), GM location (P<0.001), and CAL (P<0.001) when assessing the effect of diabetes and controlling for plaque. When assessing the effect of plaque and controlling for diabetes, the only significant difference was GI (P= 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that periodontal inflammation and destruction are increased in pregnant diabetics as compared to non-diabetic pregnant patients. These findings may have implications for diabetic control and, hence, maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant diabetic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. There is a need for solid evidence of the relative advantages of universal vs. selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Our study of a broad obstetric population determines the positive predictive value of the 50-g oral glucose challenge test for screening in the presence and absence of classical gestational diabetes risk factors. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was carried out with a total of 2,574 pregnant women. Clinical information was obtained from hospital records and each patient's medical history, and gestational diabetes risk factors were quantified for each pregnant woman. The positive predictive value of a screen was determined with respect to the number of risk factors. Results. Age 30 or over, family history of diabetes, obesity (BMI ≥27) and previous fetal macrosomia were established as the most frequent risk factors. Just over half (54.2%) of our population presented one or more risk factors. Screening covered 75% of the population, and was positive in 15% of the cases. Diagnosis was confirmed in 64 cases, 57 of them at risk, and seven with no risk factors. We obtained an overall positive predictive value of 21.8% (CI 17.3–27.0). This figure increases with the number of risk factors, from 12% for the women with no risk factors, to 40% for those presenting three or more risk factors. Conclusions. A selective screening program that takes into account the clinical background and characteristics of each pregnant woman allows a high yield of true positives while reducing the possible undesirable effects associated with false positives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Associations of acute glycemic complications with season and ambient temperature have been reported in general population with diabetes. However, little is known about the risks of acute glycemic complications in relation to season and ambient temperature in pregnant women, who are likely to be even more vulnerable. This work aimed to investigate the associations of season and ambient temperature with pregnancies complicated with hyperglycemia emergency or severe hypoglycemia., Methods: Two separate case-control studies were nested within 150,153 pregnancies by women with type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes between 2009 and 2014 in Taiwan. Hyperglycemia emergency (mainly diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state) and severe hypoglycemia occurred in 77 and 153 diabetic pregnancies (cases), respectively. Ten control pregnancies were randomly selected for each case by matching each case pregnancy on type of diabetes (i.e., T1DM, T2DM, or GDM), maternal age on the date of acute glycemic complication occurrence (i.e., index date), and "length of gestation at risk" (i.e., period between conception and index date). Meteorological parameters were retrieved from 542 meteorological monitoring stations across Taiwan during 2008-2014. Conditional logistic regression analysis with generalized estimation equation was separately performed to estimate the covariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of each of the two acute glycemic complications in association with season and ambient temperature within 30 days prior to the index date., Results: Compared to summer, winter season was associated with a significantly elevated risk of severe hypoglycemia with an OR of 1.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.79). The OR of hyperglycemic emergency was also elevated in winter season at OR of 1.88, but the significance is only marginal (95% CI 0.97-3.64, p = 0.0598). Subgroup analyses further noted that such seasonal variation was also observed in pregnancies with pre-pregnancy type 1 diabetes and gestational diabetes. On the other hand, ambient temperature was not significantly associated with the two acute glycemic complications., Conclusions: A moderately but significantly elevated risk of severe hypoglycemia was found in pregnant women with diabetes during winter season, and such increased risk was more evident in pregnancies with T1DM.

Test meals providing two levels of dietary protein (13% or 26% of the energy) were fed to eight pregnant (P), nine nonpregnant (NP), and two gestational diabetic (GDM) women. Plasma levels of amino acids were measured at 0 h and 2 h. Glucose and insulin were measured at 0, 1/2, and 2 h after the meals. In the fasting state, P women had significantly lower fasting concentrations ofmost ofthe amino acids. After the high-protein meal, rises of arginine, ornithine, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs: leucine, isoleucine, and valine), were sig- nificantly smaller in P women. Changes in BCAAs were normal in GDM women. P women had greater rises ofinsulin in response to both test meals than did NP women. This may facilitate increased BCAA uptake from the circulation. Rises in plasma glucose tended to be higher in P than NP women, suggesting that insulin's effects on glucose and BCAA uptake may be mediated separately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Twenty-four-hour metabolic profiles were performed in the third trimester of pregnancy in seven non-diabetic women (group A) and in two groups of mild gestational diabetics, at diagnosis (group B, seven patients) and after treatment with a 150-g carbohydrate diet (group C, seven patients). Mean 24-h blood metabolite levels (± SD) in groups A, B and C were: glucose: 4.65±0.82, 5.35±3.06 and 5.40±1.7 mmol/l; lactate: 1.05±0.18, 1.14±0.42 and 0.78 ±0.22mmol/l; alanine: 0.31±0.03, 0.31±0.10 and 0.27±0.07 mmol/l; ketone bodies: 0.11±0.04, 0.19 ±0.05 and 0.26±0.15mmol/l. Glucose levels were not significantly different between the groups. Ketone body levels were elevated in the diabetics prior to treatment ( p < 0.01) and rose higher on diet. Lactate levels were reduced on the diet (0.05 < P < 0.10). Abnormalities in the concentrations of total blood ketone body levels in gestational diabetics may be detrimental to fetal development and therapy should be designed to minimise changes in intermediary metabolites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Acta Diabetologica Latina is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Acta Diabetologica Latina is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is an acute life-threatening metabolic emergency characterized by ketoacidosis and relatively lower blood glucose (less than 11 mmol/L). The absence of hyperglycemia is a conundrum for physicians in the emergency department and intensive care units; it may delay diagnosis and treatment causing worse outcomes. Euglycemic DKA is an uncommon diagnosis but can occur in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. With the addition of sodium/ glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus management, euglycemic DKA incidence has increased. The other causes of euglycemic DKA include pregnancy, fasting, bariatric surgery, gastroparesis, insulin pump failure, cocaine intoxication, chronic liver disease and glycogen storage disease. The pathophysiology of euglycemic DKA involves a relative or absolute carbohydrate deficit, milder degree of insulin deficiency or resistance and increased glucagon/insulin ratio. Euglycemic DKA is a diagnosis of exclusion and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a sick patient with a history of diabetes mellitus despite lower blood glucose or absent urine ketones. The diagnostic workup includes arterial blood gas for metabolic acidosis, serum ketones and exclusion of other causes of high anion gap metabolic acidosis. Euglycemic DKA treatment is on the same principles as for DKA with correction of dehydration, electrolytes deficit and insulin replacement. The dextrose-containing fluids should accompany intravenous insulin to correct metabolic acidosis, ketonemia and to avoid hypoglycemia., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Prashant Nasa has received fees for serving as an advisory board member for Edward Life Sciences. Other authors declare no conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This study aimed to assess available epidemiological evidence of the relationship between diabetes during pregnancy and congenital abnormalities of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT)., Methods: POPLINE, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve 6962 articles of which 15 case-control and 11 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the association between CAKUT and diabetes during pregnancy., Results: Offspring born to mothers with any form of diabetes in pregnancy had a 50% increased risk of CAKUT compared with offspring of mothers without diabetes (relative risk [RR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.67). Compared with offspring with nondiabetic mothers, offspring of mothers with pre-existing diabetes had an almost 2-fold rate of CAKUT (RR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.52-2.54). Offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes had a 39% increased risk of CAKUT (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.55) compared with offspring of mothers with no diabetes. The subset of studies that adjusted for body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy showed similar associations. Population attributable risks for gestational diabetes were estimated to be 3.7% of cases of CAKUT in the United States, 4% of CAKUT cases in the United Kingdom, with up to 14.4% CAKUT cases in the South Asian population in the United Kingdom., Conclusion: This study suggests that 2.0% to 3.7% of cases of CAKUT in the United States, and up to 14% of CAKUT in some populations could be eliminated if gestational diabetes was prevented or eliminated., (© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)