Search

Annually, 172 million fall events cause temporary or permanent impairment in older adults, and this number is increasing. Contributing factors that increase the risk for falls include age, polypharmacy, and malnutrition. This study evaluated medications mainly included in the EU(7)-PIM (potentially inappropriate medication) list. From March 21, 2022, to July 6, 2022, 945 patients who experienced a fall and visited the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre of the University of Szeged in Hungary. Data from 886 patients were collected (study group). The control group included 1364 patient data collected from three general practice in Hungary. The use of ≥ 2 EU(7)-PIM drugs was found to be associated with increased risk for falls (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.88). Piracetam (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.28–2.57) and trimetazidine (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.17–2.24) were associated with increased risk for falls. Doxazosin was associated with a low risk for falls (AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41–0.86). Tiapride (AOR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.75–7.17), gliclazide (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02–2.43), and vinpocetine (AOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.29–2.95) are not included in the EU(7)-PIM list; however, they are associated with increased risk for falls. Long-acting benzodiazepines (AOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.20–2.68), antidepressants (AOR, 1.89; 95% 95% CI, 1.37–2.61), serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (AOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.41–5.67; p < 0.01), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (AOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.24–2.85) were also associated with increased risk for falls. However, Z-drugs were associated with a low risk for falls (AOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36–0.92). With the help of this tool, trimetazidine and piracetam are filtered as EU(7)-PIM drugs associated with increased risk for falls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are associated with worse health outcomes among older adults. Our objective was to examine the association between PIM prescription and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) among older adults in the United States using nationally representative data. Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing 2011–2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. Community dwelling US adults aged 65 years or older were included. A qualified definition operationalized from the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® was used to define exposure to PIMs during the study period. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Medical Outcomes Study 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) were used to measure HRQoL. Survey‐weighted linear regression models were constructed to investigate the association between PIM exposure and participants' PCS and MCS scores. Analyses were stratified across three age cohorts (65–74, 75–85, and ≥85 years). Results: Unadjusted analysis showed poorer scores in the PIM exposed group for both PCS and MCS (all p < 0.001). PIM exposure was associated with poorer PCS scores across all age groups with those aged 65–74 years (adjusted regression coefficient = −1.60 [95% CI = −2.27, −0.93; p < 0.001]), those 75–84 years (adjusted regression coefficient: −1.49 [95% CI = −2.45, −0.53; p = 0.003]), and those 85 years and older (adjusted regression coefficient = −1.65 [95% CI = −3.03, −0.27; p = 0.02]). PIM exposure was also associated with poorer MCS scores in participants aged 65–74 years (adjusted regression coefficient = −0.69 [95% CI = −1.16, −0.22; p = 0.004]) and 85 years and older (adjusted regression coefficient = −2.01 [95% CI = −3.25, −0.78; p = 0.002]). Conclusions: Our results suggest that patients' exposure to PIMs is associated with poorer HRQoL. Further work is needed to assess whether interventions to deprescribe PIMs may help to improve patients' HRQoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Medication utilization has been increasing in the U.S. year‐over‐year for several decades. As older adults take more medications, there is a higher risk of them being exposed to drug–drug or drug‐disease interactions. The American Geriatrics Society in 2019 updated their Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) Use in Older Adults. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of utilization of medications included in the 2019 Beers Criteria. Methods: An analysis was conducted using the Medicare Part D Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use File for calendar‐year 2020. Medications identified in the 2019 Beers Criteria were applied to the analysis. Two categories of medications were assessed: (1) "Avoid" and (2) "Use With Caution." Results: In 2020, 56 million prescriptions were dispensed to Medicare patients 65 years and older that are recommended to be avoided without exception (4.7% of all prescriptions) totaling $957 million in medication costs. The most utilized medication classes in this category were benzodiazepines (25,949,994 prescriptions), "Z‐drugs" (6,204,909 prescriptions), long‐acting sulfonylureas (5,306,577 prescriptions), 1st‐generation antihistamines (5,049,289 prescriptions), and tricyclic antidepressants (4,190,062 prescriptions). Additionally, 135 million prescriptions were dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older for medications which the Beers Criteria states to use caution (11.3% of all prescriptions) exceeding $2.85 billion in medication costs. The most utilized medications for this category were diuretics (74,599,126 prescriptions), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (30,033,121 prescriptions), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (11,858,968 prescriptions), tramadol (11,450,878 prescriptions), and mirtazapine (5,737,304 prescriptions). Conclusion: Even with the existence of the AGS Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults and its continued updated versions, 16% of medications dispensed to Medicare Part D were potentially inappropriate. Future studies are needed to assess if this has led to worsened outcomes among older adults who utilized these PIM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyse the reliability and validity of the Swedish indicator 'Drugs that should be avoided in older people'. Methods: From a previous study that included consecutive primary care patients ≥ 65 years of age, all patients ≥ 75 years of age were analysed. Two physicians independently screened their medication lists and medical records, applying the Swedish indicator which includes potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs): long-acting benzodiazepines, drugs with anticholinergic action, tramadol, propiomazine, codeine, and glibenclamide. The clinical relevance of identified PIMs was independently assessed. Thereafter, the physicians determined in consensus whether some medical action related to the drug treatment was medically justified and prioritised before the next regular visit. If so, the drug treatment was considered inadequate, and if not, adequate. Results: A total of 1,146 drugs were assessed in 149 patients (75‒99 years, 62% female, 0‒20 drugs per patient). In 29 (19%) patients, at least one physician identified ≥ 1 PIM according to the indicator at issue; 24 (16%) patients were concordantly identified with ≥ 1 such PIM (kappa: 0.89). Of 26 PIMs concordantly identified, the physicians concordantly assessed four as clinically relevant and 12 as not clinically relevant (kappa: 0.17). After the consensus discussion, six (4%) patients had ≥ 1 PIM according to the studied indicator that merited action. Using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the indicator did not outperform chance in identifying inadequate drug treatment: 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 0.66). Conclusion: The Swedish indicator has strong reliability regarding PIM detection but does not validly reflect the adequacy of drug treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Medication‐related problem is a concerning issue in older adults with multimorbidity due to complexity of disease conditions and polypharmacy, and may lead to increase in risk for adverse health outcomes. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of potentially inappropriate medication use among the growing population of older adults with multimorbidity in Taiwan. Method: The study population was composed of patients who were aged 65 years or older with multimorbidity (two or more chronic diseases) and had at least one outpatient clinic visit with drug prescription in 2018 identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Potentially inappropriate medication use was defined using the 2019 Beers criteria for drugs to be avoided for older adults. Multiple logistic regression model was conducted to examine patient‐related and prescriber‐related factors associated with PIM use. Results: A total of 2 432 416 patients (69.7% of the entire older adult population) had multimorbidity and received at least one drug prescription at the outpatient clinic in Taiwan in 2018. The prevalence of having at least one PIM in this population was found to be 85.6%. Patient‐related factors (age, sex, specific chronic diseases, frequency of outpatient visits) and prescriber‐related factors (physician characteristics, healthcare setting, total number of medications, prior PIM use) were found to be associated with use of PIM. Conclusion: High prevalence of PIM use was found in older patients with multimorbidity in Taiwan. Both patient‐related and prescriber‐related factors had been found to be predictors of PIM use, and should be addressed when trying to improve the medication quality in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Managing medication use in older orthopedic patients is imperative to extend their healthy life expectancy in an aging society. However, the actual situation regarding polypharmacy, the intake of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and fall risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) among older orthopedic patients is not well characterized. This study aimed to investigate the medication-based profiles of older orthopedic patients to highlight the critical points of concern. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent orthopedic surgery at two acute care hospitals between April 2020 and March 2021. The cutoff number of prescribed drugs for polypharmacy was set at 6. According to the specified guidelines, 19 categories of drugs were identified as PIMs, and 10 categories were classified as FRIDs. Results: A total of 995 older patients with orthopedic surgery were assessed, of which 57.4% were diagnosed with polypharmacy, 66.0% were receiving PIMs, and 41.7% were receiving FRIDs. The prevalence of FRID intake did not significantly differ among patients with degenerative spinal disease (n = 316), degenerative disease of extremities (n = 331), and fractures (n = 272). Compared with patients with degenerative disease of the extremities, the multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of polypharmacy and PIM intake were significantly higher in patients with degenerative spinal disease (1.26 [confidence intervals (CI): 1.11–1.44] and 1.12 [CI: 1.00–1.25]), respectively. Use of antiemetic drugs (adjusted PR, 13.36; 95% CI: 3.14–56.81) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (adjusted PR, 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05–1.78) was significantly higher in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Among patients with degenerative spinal disease, the prevalence of antiemetic drug intake was 8.7% in lumbar spinal patients and 0% in cervical spinal patients. Conclusions: More than half of the orthopedic patients in this study were affected by polypharmacy, and approximately two-thirds were prescribed some form of PIMs. Patients with degenerative spinal disease showed a significantly higher prevalence of polypharmacy and PIM use compared with other orthopedic diseases. Particular attention should be paid to the high frequency of antiemetic drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intake among patients with degenerative lumbar spine conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is associated with increased risk of hospitalizations and emergency room visits and varies by racial and ethnic subgroups. Medicare's nationwide medication therapy management (MTM) program requires that Part D plans offer an annual comprehensive medication review (CMR) to all beneficiaries who qualify, and provides a platform to reduce PIM use. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of CMR on PIM discontinuation in Medicare beneficiaries and whether this differed by race or ethnicity. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of community‐dwelling Medicare Part D beneficiaries ≥66 years of age who were eligible for MTM from 2013 to 2019 based on 5% Medicare fee‐for‐service claims data linked to the 100% MTM data file. Among those using a PIM, MTM‐eligible CMR recipients were matched to non‐recipients via sequential stratification. The probability of PIM discontinuation was estimated using regression models that pooled yearly subcohorts accounting for within‐beneficiary correlations. The most common PIMs that were discontinued after CMR were reported. Results: We matched 24,368 CMR recipients to 24,368 CMR non‐recipients during the observation period. Median age was 74–75, 35% were males, most were White beneficiaries (86%–87%), and the median number of PIMs was 1. In adjusted analyses, CMR receipt was positively associated with PIM discontinuation (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.20–1.32). There was no evidence of differential impact of CMR by race or ethnicity. The PIMs most commonly discontinued after CMR were glimepiride, zolpidem, digoxin, amitriptyline, and nitrofurantoin. Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries who are using a PIM, CMR receipt was associated with PIM discontinuation, suggesting that greater CMR use could facilitate PIM reduction for all racial and ethnic groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical context of drug interactions detected by automated analysis systems is particularly important in older patients with multimorbidities. We aimed to provide unique, up-to-date data on the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in the Polish geriatric population over 80 years old and determine the frequency and the most common PIMs involved in DDIs. We analyzed all non-prescription and prescription drugs in a representative national group of 178 home-dwelling adults over 80 years old with excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). The FORTA List was used to assess PIMs, and the Lexicomp® Drug Interactions database was used for DDIs. DDIs were detected in 66.9% of the study group, whereas PIMs were detected in 94.4%. Verification of clinical indications for the use of substances involved in DDIs resulted in a reduction in the total number of DDIs by more than 1.5 times, as well as in a nearly 3-fold decrease in the number of interactions requiring therapy modification and drug combinations that should be strictly avoided. The most common PIMs involved in DDIs were painkillers, and drugs used in psychiatry and neurology. Special attention should be paid to DDIs with PIMs since they could increase their inappropriate character. The use of automated interaction analysis systems, while maintaining appropriate clinical criticism, can increase both chances for a good therapeutic effect and the safety of the elderly during treatment processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older adults with dementia often face the risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. The quality of PIM evaluation is hindered by researchers' unfamiliarity with evaluation criteria for inappropriate drug use. While traditional machine learning algorithms can enhance evaluation quality, they struggle with the multilabel nature of prescription data. Aim: This study aimed to combine six machine learning algorithms and three multilabel classification models to identify correlations in prescription information and develop an optimal model to identify PIMs in older adults with dementia. Method: This study was conducted from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. We used cluster sampling to obtain prescription data from patients 65 years and older with dementia. We assessed PIMs using the 2019 Beers criteria, the most authoritative and widely recognized standard for PIM detection. Our modeling process used three problem transformation methods (binary relevance, label powerset, and classifier chain) and six classification algorithms. Results: We identified 18,338 older dementia patients and 36 PIMs types. The classifier chain + categorical boosting (CatBoost) model demonstrated superior performance, with the highest accuracy (97.93%), precision (95.39%), recall (94.07%), F1 score (95.69%), and subset accuracy values (97.41%), along with the lowest Hamming loss value (0.0011) and an acceptable duration of the operation (371s). Conclusion: This research introduces a pioneering CC + CatBoost warning model for PIMs in older dementia patients, utilizing machine-learning techniques. This model enables a quick and precise identification of PIMs, simplifying the manual evaluation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics (KIDs) List raises awareness of medications and excipients that should be used cautiously in specific age groups, appropriately monitored, or avoided. This project used the KIDs List to identify opportunities to improve our clinical decision support program and adjust the medication formulary. Methods: Our team used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle to assess items and take actions that included no change, creation of an alert or task for pharmacists or providers, referral for additional study, inventory modification, and modification of dose range alerts. Results: Our initial assessment of 34 formulary items identified 10 items (29%) with the recommendations from the KIDs list in place; 72% (24/34) were referred for further study. In the preliminary phase, 15% (5/34) were submitted to pharmacy information technology (IT) to develop an alert, 24% (8/34) needed inventory modifications, 24% (8/34) required dose range alert adjustments, and 9% (3/34) were referred for additional study. Final actions included the development of six new alerts, inventory modification for nine medications, dose range checking for eight medications, and no change for 11 medications. Discussion: The PDSA cycle was an effective process that allowed the team to assess each medication using a systematic approach and encouraged additional analysis when needed. We were able to compare the KIDs List recommendations to current clinical decision support parameters and make adjustments or develop new alerts within the electronic health record to match the current standard. This initiative had a team‐based approach, included key stakeholders, and is replicable in other institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Managing medication use in older orthopedic patients is imperative to extend their healthy life expectancy in an aging society. However, the actual situation regarding polypharmacy, the intake of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and fall risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) among older orthopedic patients is not well characterized. This study aimed to investigate the medication-based profiles of older orthopedic patients to highlight the critical points of concern. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent orthopedic surgery at two acute care hospitals between April 2020 and March 2021. The cutoff number of prescribed drugs for polypharmacy was set at 6. According to the specified guidelines, 19 categories of drugs were identified as PIMs, and 10 categories were classified as FRIDs. Results A total of 995 older patients with orthopedic surgery were assessed, of which 57.4% were diagnosed with polypharmacy, 66.0% were receiving PIMs, and 41.7% were receiving FRIDs. The prevalence of FRID intake did not significantly differ among patients with degenerative spinal disease (n = 316), degenerative disease of extremities (n = 331), and fractures (n = 272). Compared with patients with degenerative disease of the extremities, the multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of polypharmacy and PIM intake were significantly higher in patients with degenerative spinal disease (1.26 [confidence intervals (CI): 1.11–1.44] and 1.12 [CI: 1.00–1.25]), respectively. Use of antiemetic drugs (adjusted PR, 13.36; 95% CI: 3.14–56.81) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (adjusted PR, 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05–1.78) was significantly higher in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Among patients with degenerative spinal disease, the prevalence of antiemetic drug intake was 8.7% in lumbar spinal patients and 0% in cervical spinal patients. Conclusions More than half of the orthopedic patients in this study were affected by polypharmacy, and approximately two-thirds were prescribed some form of PIMs. Patients with degenerative spinal disease showed a significantly higher prevalence of polypharmacy and PIM use compared with other orthopedic diseases. Particular attention should be paid to the high frequency of antiemetic drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intake among patients with degenerative lumbar spine conditions.

The Screening Tool of Older Person's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) and the Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) were initially developed by a panel of experts from Cork University Hospital, Ireland in 2008, and underwent a second update in 2015. Since their inception, these criteria have played a pivotal role in identifying potentially inappropriate medication use in the elderly, enhancing oversight of medication misuse in older individuals, and reducing adverse drug events among the elderly. In 2023, the third edition of the STOPP/START criteria was released, providing updated and more practical evidence-based guidance. Building upon the second edition, this iteration includes the addition, revision, and removal of certain criteria, resulting in a total of 190 new standards for potentially inappropriate medication use. This latest version incorporates the most recent research findings and clinical evidence related to appropriate medication use in older adults. We provide a detailed analysis of the STOPP/START criteria (version 3), offering valuable insights for the updating and refinement of potentially inappropriate medication criteria in our country. Furthermore, it presents recommendations for future research in this field.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and polypharmacy constitute increasing healthcare costs and significant risk for adverse outcomes in older adults. The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria form a screening tool for the identification of PIMs and guidance for healthcare providers in prescribing appropriate medications. However, primary care physicians’ knowledge of screening tools, of Beers Criteria, in particular, is not known. Therefore, this study was to investigate primary care physicians in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and their awareness of Beers Criteria and knowledge of PIMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among primary care physicians working in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using an online self-administered questionnaire that consisted of sections on the general characteristics of respondents and their knowledge of Beers Criteria as a screening tool. Eight clinical-based vignettes concerning different therapeutic areas of medication use in the elderly were included, with a score of 1 and 0 for correct and wrong answers, respectively. Data presented as frequency and percentage. Chi-square test was used to determine the association between duration of practice and the level of awareness about Beers criteria. RESULTS: Of the 121 physicians who returned completed questionnaires, 41.3% of respondents knew about Beers Criteria. Most respondents (52.9%) were confident in prescribing appropriately for elderly patients. The association between the duration of practice and confidence level was statistically significant (P = 0.040). Respondents showed an above-average knowledge of the clinical vignettes with a correct answer rate >50% in all clinical scenarios. Online search (84.2%) and physician colleagues’ knowledge and experiences (39.2%) were the primary source of information reported by the respondents. CONCLUSION: Awareness of Beers Criteria of primary care physicians in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province is low. Therefore, our results will educate healthcare workers on the importance of Beers Criteria in Geriatric patients’ prescriptions, in order to significantly improve the well-being of the elderly.

Saleh Idrisnur,1 Nuru Abdu,2 Filipos Yohannes,3 Tomas Tewelde,4 Natnael Russom,5 Eyasu H Tesfamariam6 1Product Evaluation and Registration Unit, National Medicine and Food Administration, Ministry of Health, Asmara, Eritrea; 2Department of Pharmacy, Adi-Tekelezan Community Hospital, Ministry of Health, Adi-Tekelezan, Eritrea; 3Department of Pharmacy, Ghindae Zonal Referral Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ghindae, Eritrea; 4Gash-Barka Zonal Pharmaceutical Services, Ministry of Health, Barentu, Eritrea; 5Eritrean Pharmacovigilance Center, National Medicine and Food Administration, Ministry of Health, Asmara, Eritrea; 6Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Statistics, College of Sciences, Mai-Nefhi, EritreaCorrespondence: Saleh Idrisnur, Product Evaluation and Regulation Unit, National Medicine and Food Administration, Ministry of Health, Asmara, Eritrea, Tel +291-7455570, Email salehidrisnursct@gmail.comBackground: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is one of the main drug-related problems encountered in older adults. It is associated with adverse drug events, morbidity, mortality, increased economic costs, and negative effects on the quality of life that requires strict monitoring of prescriptions in older adults. Thus, the study aimed to assess potentially inappropriate medication use and its determinants among older adults.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all outpatient prescriptions dispensed to older adults (aged 65 years and above) in six community chain pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea. Data were collected retrospectively, between June 16 and July 16, 2023. PIMs were detected using the 2023 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers Criteria®. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed using IBM SPSS® (Version-26.0).Results: A total of 2680 outpatient prescriptions dispensed to older adults were included in this study. The prevalence of PIM among prescriptions was 18.1% (95% CI: 16.7, 19.6). Moreover, a total of 470 medications were found to be avoided in older adults. The most commonly prescribed PIMs were sulfonylureas (27.2%) and substituted alkylamines (16.2%). The prevalence of prescriptions containing medications to be used with caution in older adults was 13.2% (95% CI: 12.0, 14.5). Age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR))=0.98, 95% CI: 0.97, 0.99), polypharmacy (AOR=2.77, 95% CI: 1.49, 5.15), and general practitioner prescriber (AOR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.70) were significantly associated with PIMs.Conclusion: A considerable number of ambulatory older adults were exposed to PIMs which require a close attention by policymakers, program managers, and healthcare professionals.Keywords: potentially inappropriate medications, determinants, older adults, AGS Beers Criteria®, community chain pharmacy, Eritrea

Abstract Background Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among older adults with cancer, but their association with overall survival (OS) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of PIMs and OS in patients with NSCLC. Methods In this cohort study, we included patients ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed NSCLC from January 2014 to December 2020. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is defined by the Beers criteria of 2019 at baseline and within six months following the initiation of systemic therapy. Multivariable Cox regression model was built to assess the association between PIMs and overall survival (OS). Results We finally included 338 patients with a median follow-up for OS of 1777 days. The prevalence of patients receiving at least one PIM was 39.9% (135/338) and 61.2% (71/116) at baseline and after systemic therapy, respectively. The most important factor associated with PIM use was the number of prescribed medications (P

Introduction: Elderly with cancer often have multimorbidity, which determines a higher risk of polypharmacy. This is related to negative clinical results such as adverse drug reaction and emergence service visits. Furthermore, polypharmacy increases the risk of using potentially inappropriate medications. Objective: To evaluate the use of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly with multiple myeloma and associated factors. Methods: The study was conducted with older adults with multiple myeloma treated at outpatient oncology and hematology services in a southeastern Brazilian capital. Potentially inappropriate medications were classified using the American Geriatric Society/Beers 2019 Criteria. Variables were described using frequency and proportions, performing multiple logistic regression to identify factors associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications. Results: One hundred fifty-three older adults with multiple myeloma were included, with a median age of 70.9 years. The median number of medications was 8, and 63% of patients used polypharmacy. More than half (54%) of the patients used potentially inappropriate medications, and proton pump inhibitors (46%) and benzodiazepines (8%) were the most employed therapeutic classes. Older adults who used potentially inappropriate medications differed from those who did not use them in the following characteristics: income up to three minimum wages, higher schooling level, private service, multimorbidity, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, depression, adverse event, and polypharmacy. Higher schooling levels and polypharmacy were independently associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Potentially inappropriate medication use was high in patients with multiple myeloma studied. The use of polypharmacy and higher schooling levels were independently and positively associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is one of the main drug-related problems encountered in older adults. It is associated with adverse drug events, morbidity, mortality, increased economic costs, and negative effects on the quality of life that requires strict monitoring of prescriptions in older adults. Thus, the study aimed to assess potentially inappropriate medication use and its determinants among older adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all outpatient prescriptions dispensed to older adults (aged 65 years and above) in six community chain pharmacies in Asmara, Eritrea. Data were collected retrospectively, between June 16 and July 16, 2023. PIMs were detected using the 2023 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers Criteria®. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed using IBM SPSS® (Version-26.0). Results: A total of 2680 outpatient prescriptions dispensed to older adults were included in this study. The prevalence of PIM among prescriptions was 18.1% (95% CI: 16.7, 19.6). Moreover, a total of 470 medications were found to be avoided in older adults. The most commonly prescribed PIMs were sulfonylureas (27.2%) and substituted alkylamines (16.2%). The prevalence of prescriptions containing medications to be used with caution in older adults was 13.2% (95% CI: 12.0, 14.5). Age (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR))=0.98, 95% CI: 0.97, 0.99), polypharmacy (AOR=2.77, 95% CI: 1.49, 5.15), and general practitioner prescriber (AOR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.70) were significantly associated with PIMs. Conclusion: A considerable number of ambulatory older adults were exposed to PIMs which require a close attention by policymakers, program managers, and healthcare professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Institutionalized older adults often face complex medication regimens, increasing their risk of adverse drug events due to polypharmacy, overprescribing, medication interactions, or the use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM). However, data on medication use and associated risks in this population remain scarce. This pilot study aimed to characterize the sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic profiles, and the use of PIM among institutionalized elders residing in Residential Structures for Elderly People (ERPI) in the Faro municipality, located in the Portuguese region of the Algarve. We conducted a cross-sectional study in a non-randomized sample of 96 participants (mean age: 86.6 ± 7.86 years) where trained researchers reviewed medication profiles and identified potentially inappropriate medications using the EU(7)-PIM list. Over 90% of participants exhibited polypharmacy (≥5 medications), with an average of 9.1 ± 4.15 medications per person. About 92% had potential drug interactions, including major and moderate interactions. More than 86% used at least one potentially inappropriate medication, most commonly central nervous system drugs. This pilot study demonstrates that institutionalized older adults may be at high risk of potential medication-related problems. Implementing comprehensive medication review programs and promoting adapted prescribing practices are crucial to optimize medication use and improve the well-being of this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among older adults with cancer, but their association with overall survival (OS) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of PIMs and OS in patients with NSCLC. Methods: In this cohort study, we included patients ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed NSCLC from January 2014 to December 2020. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is defined by the Beers criteria of 2019 at baseline and within six months following the initiation of systemic therapy. Multivariable Cox regression model was built to assess the association between PIMs and overall survival (OS). Results: We finally included 338 patients with a median follow-up for OS of 1777 days. The prevalence of patients receiving at least one PIM was 39.9% (135/338) and 61.2% (71/116) at baseline and after systemic therapy, respectively. The most important factor associated with PIM use was the number of prescribed medications (P < 0.001). Baseline PIM use and PIM after systemic therapy were significantly associated with inferior OS (476 days vs. 844 days, P = 0.044; and 633 days vs. 1600 days, P = 0.007; respectively). In multivariable analysis, both baseline PIM use and PIM after systemic therapy were independent predictors of poor prognosis (adjusted HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01–1.75; P = 0.041; and adjusted HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.11–3.14; P = 0.020; respectively). Conclusions: PIMs are prevalent among older patients with NSCLC and are independent predictors of NSCLC prognosis. There is an urgent need for clinicians to conduct medication reconciliation and appropriate deprescribing for this population, especially for patients with multiple PIMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is considered an important quality indicator for older adults seen in the ambulatory care setting. To evaluate the pattern of potentially inappropriate medication (PIMs) use as specified in the Beers Criteria, for older adults during emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) we identified older adults (age 65 or older) discharged home from an ED visit in 2019. We defined PIMs as those with an 'avoid' recommendation under the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) 2019 Beers Criteria in older adults. Logistic regression models were used to assess demographic, clinical, and hospital factors associated with the use of any PIMs upon ED discharge. Overall, 5.9% of visits by older adults discharged from the ED included administration or prescriptions for PIMs. Among those who received any PIMs, 25.5% received benzodiazepines, 42.5 % received anticholinergics, 1.4% received nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics, and 0.5% received barbiturates. A multivariable model showed statistically significant associations for age 65 to 74 (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.39–2.62 vs. age >=75), dementia (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21–0.95), lower immediacy (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.56–3.84 vs. higher immediacy), and Northeastern rural region (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21–0.55 vs. Midwestern rural). We found that younger age and lower immediacy were associated with increased prescriptions of PIMs for older adults seen, while dementia and Northeastern rural region was associated with reduced use of PIMs seen and discharged from EDs in United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) impose a burden on patients with advanced cancer near the end of their lives. However, only a few studies have addressed factors associated with PIMs in such patients. Objective: To examine polypharmacy and factors associated with PIMs in end-of-life patients with advanced cancer. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting/Subjects: We analyzed 265 patients with advanced cancer who died in a palliative care unit (PCU) or at home in a home medical care (HMC) from April 2018 to December 2022 in Japan. Measurements: Sociodemographic, clinical, and prescription data at the time of PCU admission or HMC initiation were collected from electronic medical records. PIMs were assessed using OncPal Deprescribing Guidelines. Results: Patients with advanced cancer with an average age of 76.3 years and median survival days of 20 were included in the analyses. The average number of medications was 6.4 (standard deviation = 3.4), and PIMs were prescribed to 50.2%. Frequent PIMs included antihypertensive medications, peptic ulcer prophylaxis, and dyslipidemia medications. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥75 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30–4.05), referral from an outpatient setting compared with inpatient setting (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.12–3.80), more than two comorbidities (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.08–3.29), and more than five medications (aOR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.03–3.28) were associated with PIMs. Conclusions: Medication reconciliation is recommended at the time of transition to a PCU or HMC, especially for older patients with advanced cancer who were referred from an outpatient setting and present more comorbidities and prescriptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Deprescribing opportunities may differ across health care systems, nursing home settings, and prescribing cultures. The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of STOPPFrail medications according to frailty status among residents of nursing homes in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain. Secondary cross-sectional analyses of data from 4 cohort studies. A total of 1142 residents in 31 nursing homes. Medication data were extracted from resident records. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL-NH scale (non-frail 0–2; frail 3–6; most-frail 7–14). Chi-square tests and prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare STOPPFrail medication use across cohorts. In total, 84.7% of non-frail, 95.6% of frail, and 90.6% of most-frail residents received ≥1 STOPPFrail medication. Overall, the most prevalent STOPPFrail medications were antihypertensives (53.0% in China to 73.3% in Australia, P <.001), vitamin D (nil in China to 52.7% in Australia, P <.001), lipid-lowering therapies (11.1% in Japan to 38.9% in Australia, P <.001), aspirin (13.5% in Japan to 26.2% in China, P <.001), proton pump inhibitors (2.1% in Japan to 32.0% in Australia, P <.001), and antidiabetic medications (12.3% in Japan to 23.5% in China, P =.010). Overall use of antihypertensives (PR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06–1.25), lipid-lowering therapies (PR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.45–2.18), aspirin (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04–1.64), and antidiabetic medications (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00–1.72) were more prevalent among non-frail and frail residents compared with most-frail residents. Antihypertensive use was more prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Japan, but less prevalent with increasing frailty in Australia. Antidiabetic medication use was less prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Spain but was consistent across frailty groups in Australia and Japan. There were overall and frailty-specific variations in prevalence of different STOPPFrail medications across cohorts. This may reflect differences in prescribing cultures, application of clinical practice guidelines in the nursing home setting, and clinician or resident attitudes toward deprescribing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Medicina (Buenos Aires) is the property of Medicina (Buenos Aires) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older individuals are widespread phenomena that are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. The Beers Criteria is a tool that helps to identify patients that are prescribed with PIMs, thereby reducing the risk of associated harm. Amongst other populations, the criteria identify drugs that should not be used by the majority of older patients. Aim: Determining the proportion of older inpatients who were discharged from hospitalization with polypharmacy (a prescription for more than seven drugs), or with a PIM as defined by the Beers Criteria. Methods: A descriptive cross‐sectional study based on patients aged 65 and over who were hospitalized in the years 2019–2021 in the internal medicine, orthopedic and surgical wards at a medium‐size hospital. Demographic information and details about drug treatment were collected from the electronic patient records system. Patients who died during hospitalization were excluded from the study group. Main Outcome Measures: The proportion of inpatients with polypharmacy or a PIM as part of their regular prescription, at the time of admission and at discharge. Results: 49 564 patients were included in the study cohort. At discharge, 19% of the patients were given a prescription for a PIM, with a small but significant decrease compared with the rate admission (22.1%). At discharge, 42.8% of patients had polypharmacy, representing a small but significant increase compared with the rate on admission (40.6%). Conclusions: The study demonstrated high baseline rates of PIM prescription and polypharmacy. Hospitalization was associated with a decrease in PIM prescription and an increase in polypharmacy. This highlights the importance of medication review during admission to reduce the potential risk to older adults from polypharmacy and PIM prescription. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionPotentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) cause adverse events and death. We evaluate the Care Ecosystem (CE) collaborative dementia care program on medication use among community-dwelling persons living with dementia (PLWD).MethodsSecondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing CE to usual care (UC) on changes in PIMs, over 12 months between March 2015 and May 2020. Secondary outcomes included change in number of medications, clinically relevant PIMs, and anti-dementia medications.ResultsOf 804 PLWD, N = 490 had complete medication data. The CE resulted in significantly fewer PIMs compared to UC (-0.35; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.20; P

Background The prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), including NSAIDs, first-generation antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and benzodiazepines among elderly inpatients in Thailand, based on the 2019 Beers criteria, is insufficiently investigated. Methods This study retrospectively examined 300 elderly patients in a Thai tertiary hospital, assessing four PIM classes based on the 2019 Beers criteria and exploring factors and variations in PIM prescription patterns across different phases of hospitalisation. Results The study found an overall PIM prescription rate of 28%, consisting of: benzodiazepines (14%), first-generation antihistamines (9%), NSAIDs (3%), and TCAs (2%). Patients taking at least 5 medications prior to admission were more likely to receive PIMs (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.15–12.35). Furthermore, PIM prescription was significantly associated with age, showing a 4.8% yearly increase (p = 0.01), and the number of comorbidities increased by 16.2% per unit (p = 0.021). Additionally, PIM use during admission was significantly linked to a longer hospital stay (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.50–7.33). Conclusions These findings emphasise the need for continued monitoring and optimisation of medication management, and collaboration between pharmacists and physicians to review and adjust prescriptions, especially in elderly inpatients experiencing polypharmacy and multiple comorbidities.

BackgroundPrevious studies identified alarming increases in medication use, polypharmacy, and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among minority older adults with multimorbidity. However, PIM use among underserved older Latino adults is still largely unknown. The main objective of this study is to examine the prevalence of PIM use among underserved, community-dwelling older Latino adults. This study examines both the complexity of polypharmacy in this community and identifies associations between PIM and multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and access to medical care among this segment of our population.MethodsThis community-based, cross-sectional study included 126 community-dwelling Latinos aged 65 years and older. The updated 2019 AGS Beers Criteria was used to identify participants using PIMs. We used multinomial logistic regression to examine the independent association of PIM with several independent variables including demographic characteristics, the number of chronic conditions, the number of prescription medications used, level of pain, and sleep difficulty. In addition, we present five cases in order to offer greater insight into PIM use among our sample.ResultsOne-third of participants had at least one use of PIM. Polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was observed in 55% of our sample. In addition, 46% took drugs to be used with caution (UWC). In total, 16% were taking between 9 and 24 medications, whereas 39% and 46% were taking 5 to 8 and 1 to 4 prescription medications, respectively. The multinomial logit regression analysis showed that (controlling for demographic variables) increased PIM use was associated with an increased number of prescription medications, number of chronic conditions, sleep difficulty, lack of access to primary care, financial strains, and poor self-rated health.DiscussionBoth qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed recurrent themes in the missed identification of potential drug-related harm among underserved Latino older adults. Our data suggest that financial strain, lack of access to primary care, as well as an increased number of medications and co-morbidity are inter-connected. Lack of continuity of care often leads to fragmented care, putting vulnerable patients at risk of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions as clinicians lack access to a current and complete list of medications patients are using at any given time. Therefore, improving access to health care and thereby continuity of care among older Latino adults with multimorbidity has the potential to reduce both polypharmacy and PIM use. Programs that increase access to regular care and continuity of care should be prioritized among multimorbid, undeserved, Latino older adults in an effort toward improved health equity.

Purpose: This study aims to identify PIM prevalence in older adults according to the 2019 Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions version 2 (STOPP v2) criteria, and the Portuguese EU(7)-PIM list and also to analyze the concordance between these criteria. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 1200 Portuguese older adults (≥ 65 years old), users of primary health care. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data were collected concerning the period between April 2021 and August 2022. A comparative analysis was performed between the three PIM identification criteria, and the concordance was determined according to the Lin concordance correlation coefficient. Results: The mean age was 76.3 (SD 7.7) years old and 57.6% of the older adults were females. Our findings indicate varying prevalence rates among these criteria with 63.8% (95% CI 61.0–66.6%), 66.8% (95% CI 64.1–69.5%), and 50.1% (95% CI 47.2–53.0%) of the older adults take at least one PIM according to the EU(7)-PIM list, Beers 2019, and STOPP v2 criteria, respectively. The highest prevalence observed was for proton pump inhibitors according to EU(7)-PIM list (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6–32.9) and Beers criteria (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6–32.9) and alprazolam according to STOPP v2 criteria (10.1%, 95% CI 8.4–11.9%). A poor concordance between criteria was observed (< 0.834). The highest concordance coefficient was found between the EU(7)-PIM list and the Beers criteria (0.833), and the lowest between the EU(7)-PIM list and STOPP criteria (0.735). Conclusion: This study reveals varying prevalence rates of PIM in older adults, as assessed by different criteria, and highlights the need for targeted interventions and improved prescribing practices. In the future, studies should focus on the occurrence of negative outcomes in older adults associated with PIM consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses an analysis of the Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Adults Discharged from the Emergency Department (EQUIPPED) implementation trial to determine trends in gabapentinoid prescribing among U.S. Veterans Affairns (VA) emergency departments (ED) implementing the program. Cited are a comparison of gabapentinoid prescribing during the pre- and post-implementation periods in the dashboard and academic detailing groups, and limitations of the study.

Over half of older adults experience polypharmacy, including medications that may be inappropriate or unnecessary. Deprescribing, which is the process of discontinuing or reducing inappropriate and/or unnecessary medications, is an effective way to reduce polypharmacy. This review summarizes (1) the process of deprescribing and conceptual models and tools that have been developed to facilitate deprescribing, (2) barriers, enablers, and factors associated with deprescribing, and (3) characteristics of deprescribing interventions in completed trials, as well as (4) implementation considerations for deprescribing in routine practice. In conceptual models of deprescribing, multilevel factors of the patient, clinician, and health‐care system are all related to the efficacy of deprescribing. Numerous tools have been developed for clinicians to facilitate deprescribing, yet most require substantial time and, thus, may be difficult to implement during routine health‐care encounters. Multiple deprescribing interventions have been evaluated, which mostly include one or more of the following components: patient education, medication review, identification of deprescribing targets, and patient and/or provider communication about high‐risk medications. Yet, there has been limited consideration of implementation factors in prior deprescribing interventions, especially with regard to the personnel and resources in existing health‐care systems and the feasibility of incorporating components of deprescribing interventions into the routine care processes of clinicians. Future trials require a more balanced consideration of both effectiveness and implementation when designing deprescribing interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older persons are more likely to have multiple chronic diseases, leading to the simultaneous use of many medications. This situation results in increased drug-related problems (DRPs), which are the causes of adverse health outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of and associated risk factors for exposure to >1 criterion of DRPs among older adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 357 participants aged ≥60 years admitted to Ramathibodi Hospital from 1 February 2022 to 30 November 2022. The participants were evaluated for baseline characteristics, medications and DRPs and were classified into two groups, according to their exposure to DRPs: patients with exposure to ≤1 criteria and patients with exposure to >1 criterion of DRPs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors for exposure to >1 criterion of DRPs. Results: Overall, 205 (57.4%) patients experienced >1 criterion of DRPs. Approximately 67.8%, 71.7% and 7.6% of the participants were exposed to at least one potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), drug–drug interaction (DDI) and adverse drug events (ADE), respectively. The most frequently prescribed PIMs were proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (17.3%). Antineoplastics (48.1%) were the most frequently drug class related to ADEs. Overall, 37% of the ADEs in the current study were considered preventable ADEs. After adjustment for potential confounders, polypharmacy and the use of proton pump inhibitors, hypoglycemics, diuretics, psycholeptics, psychoanaleptics and cardiac therapy medications were correlated with a higher risk of exposure to > 1 criterion of PIMs, DDIs or ADEs. Conclusions: Therefore, comprehensive medication reviews and careful medication prescriptions are recommended in the geriatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older adults often have chronic diseases for which they receive multiple drugs, which may be potentially inappropriate. Objectives: We aimed to describe the potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) leading to adverse drug events (ADEs) in older patients with cancer. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the association of nutrition, cognition, and frailty with PIM-related ADEs and to assess the impact of PIM-related ADEs on overall survival (OS). We also investigated the cut-off for defining polypharmacy as related to ADEs. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study on patients with cancer aged 60 years and over who were assessed in the geriatric oncology clinic at the Tata Memorial Hospital (Mumbai, India) from June 2018 to August 2022. Medications, PIM assessment, nutrition (assessed by Mini Nutritional Assessment [MNA]), cognition (assessed by Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] and Hindi Mental State Examination), and frailty (assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS]) were extracted from the geriatric oncology clinic database. PIMs were identified using the Beers criteria, European Union-7 (EU[7])-PIM, Screening Tool of Older person's Prescriptions/Screening tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START), Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA), and PRISCUS list. Results: In total, 1472 patients were assessed in the geriatric oncology clinic, of which 823 (55.9%) were enrolled in the study. There were 1287 PIMs detected in 823 patients, of which 431 (33.5%) led to ADEs and 856 (66.5%) did not. Proton pump inhibitors and tramadol were the most common PIMs identified. ADEs were noted in 54 (14.7%) patients on proton pump inhibitors and in 145 (61.1%) patients on tramadol. ADEs were significantly associated with malnutrition, lower cognition, and frailty. The median MNA score in patients without and with ADEs was 20.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 17.5-24.0) and 19.5 (IQR, 15.5–23.5), respectively; P, 0.001. The median MMSE score for the patients without and with ADEs was 28 (IQR, 26-29) and 27 (IQR: 25-29), respectively; P, 0.001. The median CFS scores for the patients without and with ADEs were 3 (IQR, 2-4) and 4 (IQR, 3-5), respectively; P < 0.001. The median OS in patients without and with ADEs was 13.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.64-17.87) and 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.80-12.85), respectively; P, 0.002. The optimal cut-off for polypharmacy leading to ADEs was 4.5 medications. Conclusions: There is a dire need to recognize and appropriately manage PIMs in older patients with cancer as PIM-related toxicities may negatively impact survival. Monitoring PIMs and following the recommendations to optimize the dose, avoid the drug, and find alternatives may improve the oncologic outcomes. Future studies should focus on adding a control group of patients not on PIMs, following up on PIM after recommendations, and investigating the impact of these recommendations on oncologic outcomes (Clinical Trials Registry-India: CTRI/2020/04/024675).

Abstract Backgound Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has been evaluated in several countries, and several strategies have been devised for deprescribing drugs in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile application in reducing PIP for older adults in primary care facilities in Brazil. Methods This randomised, triple-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted in 22 public primary care facilities in Brazil. During the intervention phase, the general practitioners (GPs) were randomly allocated to the intervention (MPI Brasil app provides information about PIP, therapeutic alternatives and deprescribing) or control (MedSUS app provides general information about medications) group. All GPs were trained on the Clinical Decision-Making Process and how to access an Evidence-Based Health website. The GPs received an Android tablet with an installed mobile application depending on their allocated group, which they used when caring for older patients over at least 3 months. At the end of this period, a sample of older patients aged ≥ 60 years who had been awaiting medical consultation by the participating GPs were interviewed and their prescriptions analysed. The primary outcome was the frequency of PIP in and between the groups. Results Among 53 GPs who were administered the baseline survey, 14 were included in the clinical trial. At baseline, 146 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 37.7% (55/146), in the intervention group was 40.6% (28/69), and in the control group was 35.1% (27/77). After the intervention, 284 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 31.7% (90/284), in the intervention group was 32.2% (46/143), and in the control group was 31.2% (44/141) (RR: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76–1.76). In the within-group analysis, the PIP reduced from before to after the intervention in both groups—more significantly in the intervention than in the control group (p

Abstract Objectives Cancer is the disease of the ageing. Most of the elderly cancer patients have pre-existing illnesses requiring complexity of medical care. Excessive medications would lead not only futility, but also result in adverse outcomes especially if such over-prescription is not appropriate. This study was intended to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy (PP) and potentially-inappropriate medications (PIMs) among elderly cancer patients eligible for active cancer care and their associations with hospitalization and mortality. Materials and methods This was a prospective cohort study conducted among the elderly non-hematologic cancer patients (≥ 65 years old) whom a medical oncologist had decided suitable for systemic cancer therapy. Demographic data including age, sex, primary site of cancer, cancer stage at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), numbers and kinds of medications used both prior to and during cancer treatment were recorded. Hospitalizations not related to systemic cancer therapy administration and mortality were prospectively monitored. All of the patients had to be followed at least one year after cancer diagnosis. Results There were 180 eligible participants. Median age in years (IQR) was 68 (65–73). One hundred patients (55.56%) were male and 80 patients (44.44%) were female. Breast (35, 19.44%), lung (31, 17.22%) and colorectal (18, 10%) cancers were the most common diagnoses. Eighty-six patients (47.78%) had metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis. One hundred twenty-two patients (67.78%) had PP (5 or more medications a day) and thirty-six patients (20%) had hyper-PP (10 or more medications a day). One hundred twenty five of the whole cohort (69.4%) had PIMs. Patients with more serious CCI scores were associated with PP and hyper-PP. While patients with primary lung cancer was only the only factor associated with PIMs. When excluding opioids, laxatives and anti-emetics, the most frequently prescribed drugs during cancer treatment, the so-called corrected PP did not associate with worse 1-year survival. Factors correlated with 1-year mortality were more advanced age group (70 years old or more) (OR 2.24; 95% C.I., 1.14–4.41; p = 0.019), primary lung cancer (OR 2.89; 95% C.I., 1.45–5.78; p = 0.003), metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis (OR 4.57; 95% C.I., 1.90–10.97; p = 0.001), and unplanned hospitalizations (OR 3.09; 95% C.I.,1.60–5.99; p = 0.001). While male gender (OR 2.35; 95% C.I., 1.17–4.71; p = 0.016), metastatic stage at cancer diagnosis (OR 2.74; 95% C.I., 1.33–5.66; p = 0.006) and corrected PP (OR 1.90; 95% C.I. 1.01–3.56; p = 0.046) were the significant predictive factors of unplanned hospitalizations. Conclusion Among elderly cancer patients suitable for systemic cancer therapy, around two thirds of patients had PP and PIMs. Higher CCI score was the only significant predictor of PP and hyper-PP; while primary lung cancer was the sole independent factor predicting PIMs. PP was associated with unplanned hospitalizations, albeit not the survival.

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, and drug-drug interactions on in-hospital mortality in older COVID-19 inpatients. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic medical data from a tertiary hospital in Chengdu from December 2022 to January 2023. The 2019 AGS/Beers criteria was used to evaluate the potentially inappropriate mediation (PIM) status of older COVID-19 inpatients (age ≥ 65 years), the drug-drug interactions were evaluated on Medscape, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 206 older COVID-19 inpatients were included in the study. The mean number of drugs per day was 13.04. The prevalence of PIM use based on the 2019 AGS Beers Criteria was 66.99%. The prevalence of drug-drug interactions was 61.65%. Logistic regression demonstrated that age ≥ 80 (OR: 10.321, 95% CI: 1.649, 64.579, P = 0.013), renal insufficiency (OR: 4.740, 95% CI: 1.366, 16.447, P = 0.014), long-term hospitalization (OR: 6.637, 95% CI: 1.030, 42.779, P = 0.046), severe pneumonia (OR: 50.230, 95% CI: 5.180, 487.041, P = 0.001) were influencing factors associated with in-hospital mortality in older COVID-19 inpatients. Conclusions The polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, and drug-drug interactions were seen in many older COVID-19 inpatients.

The clinical context of drug interactions detected by automated analysis systems is particularly important in older patients with multimorbidities. We aimed to provide unique, up-to-date data on the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in the Polish geriatric population over 80 years old and determine the frequency and the most common PIMs involved in DDIs. We analyzed all non-prescription and prescription drugs in a representative national group of 178 home-dwelling adults over 80 years old with excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). The FORTA List was used to assess PIMs, and the Lexicomp® Drug Interactions database was used for DDIs. DDIs were detected in 66.9% of the study group, whereas PIMs were detected in 94.4%. Verification of clinical indications for the use of substances involved in DDIs resulted in a reduction in the total number of DDIs by more than 1.5 times, as well as in a nearly 3-fold decrease in the number of interactions requiring therapy modification and drug combinations that should be strictly avoided. The most common PIMs involved in DDIs were painkillers, and drugs used in psychiatry and neurology. Special attention should be paid to DDIs with PIMs since they could increase their inappropriate character. The use of automated interaction analysis systems, while maintaining appropriate clinical criticism, can increase both chances for a good therapeutic effect and the safety of the elderly during treatment processes.

Introduction: Older patients are frequently affected by infectious diseases and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of consecutively prescribed antibiotics. Particularly within geriatric psychiatry, high rates of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) have been described, significantly complicating pharmacological treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the frequency and characteristics of antibiotic PIPs in geriatric psychiatry. Methods: Medication charts of 139 patient cases (mean age 78.8 years; 69.8% female) receiving antibiotic treatment on a geriatric psychiatric ward were analyzed. Utilizing previously published definitions of antibiotic PIPs, adequacy of the antibiotic prescriptions was subsequently assessed. Results: 16.3% of all screened patient cases (139/851) received an antibiotic treatment during their inpatient stay. 59.5% of antibiotic prescriptions were due to urinary tract infections, followed by pulmonary (13.3%) and skin and soft tissue infections (11.3%). 46.7% of all antibiotic prescriptions fulfilled at least one PIP criterium, with the prescription of an antibiotic course for more than seven days as the most common PIP (15.3%). Discussion: Antibiotic PIPs can be considered as a frequent phenomenon in geriatric psychiatry. Especially the use of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins should be discussed critically due to their extensive side effect profiles. Due to the special characteristics of geriatric psychiatric patients, international guidelines on the use of antibiotics should consider frailty and psychotropic polypharmacy of this patient population more closely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Polypharmacy prevalence is increasing worldwide, and it is becoming more popular among the elderly. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using the Beers criteria (2019 edition), criteria for potentially inappropriate medications for older adults in China (Chinese criteria), Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions (STOPP), and Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria and to identify risk factors associated with PIM use. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 276 inpatients aged ≥65 years old from January 2020 to June 2020. A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze PIMs based on the Beers (2019 edition), Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria. PIMs use was analysed based on four different criteria and logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent factors associated with PIM use. Results: The mean number of medications used by the elderly population was nine (range, 0–28). A total of 252 patients (accounting for 91.30%) took five or more medications and 120 patients (accounting for 43.48%) took 10 or more medications. The prevalence rates of PIMs were 66.30% (183/276), 55.07% (152/ 276), 26.45% (73/276), and 64.13% (177/276) determined by the Beers, Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria, respectively. The top PIMs screened using the Beers, Chinese, and STOPP criteria were proton pump inhibitors, clopidogrel, and benzodiazepines, respectively. Missed use of ACEI in patients with systolic heart failure and/or coronary artery disease was found to be the most common potential prescription omission (PPOs) analyzed using the START criteria. Logistic regression analysis showed that the strongest predictor of PIMs, as determined by all four criteria, was an increased number of medications (p < 0.001). Age was another risk factor for PIMs based on the STOPP criteria in our study (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIMs were common in our study, and the risk of PIMs correlated with polypharmacy. Application of the Beers, Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria is a useful tool for detecting PIM use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Backgound: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has been evaluated in several countries, and several strategies have been devised for deprescribing drugs in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile application in reducing PIP for older adults in primary care facilities in Brazil. Methods: This randomised, triple-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted in 22 public primary care facilities in Brazil. During the intervention phase, the general practitioners (GPs) were randomly allocated to the intervention (MPI Brasil app provides information about PIP, therapeutic alternatives and deprescribing) or control (MedSUS app provides general information about medications) group. All GPs were trained on the Clinical Decision-Making Process and how to access an Evidence-Based Health website. The GPs received an Android tablet with an installed mobile application depending on their allocated group, which they used when caring for older patients over at least 3 months. At the end of this period, a sample of older patients aged ≥ 60 years who had been awaiting medical consultation by the participating GPs were interviewed and their prescriptions analysed. The primary outcome was the frequency of PIP in and between the groups. Results: Among 53 GPs who were administered the baseline survey, 14 were included in the clinical trial. At baseline, 146 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 37.7% (55/146), in the intervention group was 40.6% (28/69), and in the control group was 35.1% (27/77). After the intervention, 284 prescriptions were analysed: the PIP overall was 31.7% (90/284), in the intervention group was 32.2% (46/143), and in the control group was 31.2% (44/141) (RR: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76–1.76). In the within-group analysis, the PIP reduced from before to after the intervention in both groups—more significantly in the intervention than in the control group (p < 0.001). In the stratified analysis of PIP frequency by GPs, there was a relative risk reduction in 86% (6/7) of GPs in the intervention group compared to 71% (5/7) in the control group. Conclusion: We found that the MPI Brasil app effectively reduced PIP, suggesting that it may be useful to incorporate this tool into clinical practice. Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02918643). First registration on 22/09/2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With rising worldwide population aging, the number of homebound individuals with multimorbidity is increasing. Improvement in the quality of home medical care (HMC), including medications, contributes to meeting older adults' preference for "aging in place" and securing healthcare resources. Objective: To evaluate the changes in drug prescriptions, particularly potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), among older adults receiving HMC in recent years, during which measures addressing inappropriate polypharmacy were implemented, including the introduction of clinical practice guidelines and medical fees for deprescribing. Design: A cross-sectional study. Participants: Using data from the national claims database in Japan, this study included older adults aged ≥ 75 years who received HMC in October 2015 (N = 499,850) and October 2019 (N = 657,051). Main Measures: Number of drugs, prevalence of polypharmacy (≥ 5 regular drugs), major drug categories/classes, and PIMs according to Japanese guidelines were analyzed. Random effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate the differences in medications between 2015 and 2019, considering the correlation within individuals who contributed to the analysis in both years. Key Results: The number of drugs remained unchanged from 2015 to 2019 (median: 6; interquartile range: 4, 9). The prevalence of polypharmacy also remained unchanged at 70.0% in both years (P = 0.93). However, the prescription of some drugs (e.g., direct oral anticoagulants, new types of hypnotics, acetaminophen, proton pump inhibitors, and β-blockers) increased, whereas others (e.g., warfarin, vasodilators, H2 blockers, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and benzodiazepines) decreased. Among the frequently prescribed PIMs, benzodiazepines/Z-drugs (25.6% in 2015 to 21.1% in 2019; adjusted odds ratio: 0.52) and H2 blockers (11.2 to 7.3%; 0.45) decreased, whereas diuretics (23.8 to 23.6%; 0.90) and antipsychotics (9.7 to 10.5%; 1.11) remained unchanged. Conclusions: We observed some favorable changes but identified some continuous and new challenges. This study suggests that continued attention to medication optimization is required to achieve safe and effective HMC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) is a crucial problem in the geriatric population. The amount of prescription and unadherence increase because of the different problems encountered in cancer patients. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of PIM in patients with gastrointestinal system cancer and to investigate its relationship with chemotherapy side effects, mortality, and progression. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed 154 patients with gastrointestinal system cancer. Demographics and disease features, the presence of PIM according to the “TIME-to-STOP” criteria and baseline laboratory parameters were recorded. The effects of PIM on survival and adverse treatment events were evaluated. Results: 66.9% of the cases were male and 33.1% were female. The mean age was 71.9±6.4 years. The most common side effects of chemotherapy are nausea, vomiting, kidney injury, and pain. The most frequently used prescriptions among the 98 PIMs were gliclazide, hyoscine N-butylbromide, simethicone, diphenoxylate atropine, and thiocolchicoside. PIM was detected in 68.1% of the participants. Chemotherapy side effects were more common in PIM group (p<0.001, odds ratio =5.6). PIM had no effect on mortality. Factors associated with mortality were age, stage, albumin, creatinine, operation history, and progression. A significant relationship was found between age, cancer stage, albumin, creatinine, operation history, and PIM in the regression model. There was no relationship between PIM and progression-free survival. Conclusion: Chemotherapy toxicity may increase with PIM detected on diagnosis. We suggest that PIM is an important factor in predicting the side effects of chemotherapy and minimizing the adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to identify the association of chronic polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) with adverse health outcomes (AHOs) in community-dwelling older adults with diabetes in China. Methods: A 2-year retrospective cohort study was conducted using 11,829 community-followed older adults with diabetes and medical records from 83 hospitals and 702 primary care centers in Shenzhen, China. Chronic polypharmacy and PIMs were identified from prescription records using Beers' criteria, and their associated AHO was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of chronic polypharmacy and at least one PIM exposure was 46.37% and 55.09%, respectively. The top five PIMs were diuretics, benzodiazepines, first-generation antihistamines, sulfonylureas, and insulin (sliding scale). Chronic polypharmacy was positively associated with all-cause hospital admission, admission for coronary heart disease, admission for stroke, admission for dementia, and emergency department visits. Exposure to PIMs was positively associated with all-cause hospital admission, admission for heart failure (PIMs ≥2), admission for stroke (PIMs ≥3), emergency department visits, bone fracture, constipation, and diarrhea. Conclusion: Chronic polypharmacy and PIMs were prevalent in older adults with diabetes in Chinese communities. Iatrogenic exposure to chronic polypharmacy and PIMs is associated with a higher incidence of different AHOs. This observational evidence highlights the necessity of patient-centered medication reviews for chronic polypharmacy and PIMs use in older patients with diabetes in primary care facilities in China and draws attention to the caution of polypharmacy, especially PIM use in older adults with diabetes in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Cancer is the disease of the ageing. Most of the elderly cancer patients have pre-existing illnesses requiring complexity of medical care. Excessive medications would lead not only futility, but also result in adverse outcomes especially if such over-prescription is not appropriate. This study was intended to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy (PP) and potentially-inappropriate medications (PIMs) among elderly cancer patients eligible for active cancer care and their associations with hospitalization and mortality. Materials and methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted among the elderly non-hematologic cancer patients (≥ 65 years old) whom a medical oncologist had decided suitable for systemic cancer therapy. Demographic data including age, sex, primary site of cancer, cancer stage at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), numbers and kinds of medications used both prior to and during cancer treatment were recorded. Hospitalizations not related to systemic cancer therapy administration and mortality were prospectively monitored. All of the patients had to be followed at least one year after cancer diagnosis. Results: There were 180 eligible participants. Median age in years (IQR) was 68 (65–73). One hundred patients (55.56%) were male and 80 patients (44.44%) were female. Breast (35, 19.44%), lung (31, 17.22%) and colorectal (18, 10%) cancers were the most common diagnoses. Eighty-six patients (47.78%) had metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis. One hundred twenty-two patients (67.78%) had PP (5 or more medications a day) and thirty-six patients (20%) had hyper-PP (10 or more medications a day). One hundred twenty five of the whole cohort (69.4%) had PIMs. Patients with more serious CCI scores were associated with PP and hyper-PP. While patients with primary lung cancer was only the only factor associated with PIMs. When excluding opioids, laxatives and anti-emetics, the most frequently prescribed drugs during cancer treatment, the so-called corrected PP did not associate with worse 1-year survival. Factors correlated with 1-year mortality were more advanced age group (70 years old or more) (OR 2.24; 95% C.I., 1.14–4.41; p = 0.019), primary lung cancer (OR 2.89; 95% C.I., 1.45–5.78; p = 0.003), metastatic disease at cancer diagnosis (OR 4.57; 95% C.I., 1.90–10.97; p = 0.001), and unplanned hospitalizations (OR 3.09; 95% C.I.,1.60–5.99; p = 0.001). While male gender (OR 2.35; 95% C.I., 1.17–4.71; p = 0.016), metastatic stage at cancer diagnosis (OR 2.74; 95% C.I., 1.33–5.66; p = 0.006) and corrected PP (OR 1.90; 95% C.I. 1.01–3.56; p = 0.046) were the significant predictive factors of unplanned hospitalizations. Conclusion: Among elderly cancer patients suitable for systemic cancer therapy, around two thirds of patients had PP and PIMs. Higher CCI score was the only significant predictor of PP and hyper-PP; while primary lung cancer was the sole independent factor predicting PIMs. PP was associated with unplanned hospitalizations, albeit not the survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]