Search

Background: Neer type V distal clavicle fractures are considered the most unstable fracture type and are characterized by the disruption of continuity between the coracoclavicular (C-C) ligaments and proximal or distal bone fragments. However, owing to the rarity of such fractures, there is currently no universally accepted surgical procedure for their treatment. Recently, the scorpion plate, an anatomical, non-locking, pre-contoured plate with two grasping arms to fix the distal or inferior clavicular fragments, was introduced. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative functional and radiological outcomes of osteosynthesis using only scorpion plates in Neer type V fractures. Methods: We retrospectively identified 23 patients who underwent scorpion plate fixation for Neer type V fractures at two general hospitals. All patients underwent only plate fixation without C-C ligament augmentation. Subsequently, we investigated their postoperative functional outcomes, complication rates, and modified C-C distance ratio at 1 year. Results: The mean postoperative Constant score was 96 ± 5, with all cases achieving bone union. Complications within 1 year postoperatively included plate loosening in one patient (4.3%) and plate irritation in two patients (8.7%). Additionally, the modified C-C distance ratio averaged 114 ± 15%. Conclusions: This study offers novel insights into the management of Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. Our findings indicate that osteosynthesis using only scorpion plates can lead to satisfactory functional outcomes with minimal complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the effectiveness of volar plate surgery in patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) initially treated nonsurgically but later experiencing reduction loss during follow-ups. Specifically, it assessed the impact of early surgery (E) (<3 weeks) versus delayed surgery (D) (3–6 weeks) on wrist function in surgically treated DRFs. This retrospective study included 131 patients who underwent surgery after loss of reduction. Among them, 42 patients had delayed surgery, whereas 89 received early surgical treatment. The mean follow-up duration was 18 months. The primary outcome measure was Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Secondary outcomes included Short Form-12 physical component summary and mental component summary scores, postoperative range of motion, and radiological measurements such as radial length, radial inclination angle, and volar tilt angle. Fracture types were categorized using Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification based on radiological images. All 131 DRFs achieved radiological union. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 8.0 (range, 0–78) and 10.8 (range, 0–73) for groups E and D, respectively, and the difference was not considered clinically relevant. Short Form-12 physical component summary scores (49.4 for E; 45.3 for D) and Short Form-12 mental component summary scores (52.3 for E; 53.5 for D) were similar in the two groups. Radiological measurements and range of motion were similar in the two groups. Complications, including carpal tunnel syndrome, superficial radial nerve neuropraxia, and complex regional pain syndrome, occurred in 12 (13.5%) E group patients and 9 (21.4%) D group patients. Clinical and radiological results of early and delayed surgery after loss of reduction in secondary displaced DRF were similar. However, complication rates were higher in delayed surgery. Prognostic IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Unfallchirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: In displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF), surgical treatment ranges from closed to open procedures. Soft tissue interposition can impede closed reduction, making open techniques necessary. While K-wire fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) lead to good results, plate fixation could be an alternative in patients with limited growth potential and highly unstable or insufficiently retained fractures. Only few studies with low sample sizes have assessed plate fixation, yet. In this study, the outcome of pediatric PHFs treated with plate fixation was evaluated. Materials and methods: We present a retrospective case series of 18 patients with open growth plates and unilateral, displaced PHFs, treated with plate fixation. The mean age at trauma was 12.1 years (± 2.4), the mean follow-up was 6.52 years (± 4.37). A mean fracture angulation of 32.3° (± 10.89°) was seen. Postoperative assessments included range of motion, clinical scores [Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Score (PASS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score], radiological parameters and subjective satisfaction. Results: All patients showed excellent results in SST (99.4% ± 0.02), SSV (98.3% ± 0.04), ASES-score (100% ± 0) and PASS (0.99 ± 0.01). In the DASH-score, 17 patients had excellent results, one patient showed a good outcome. Fracture healing occurred in all patients without complications. Eight patients complained about bothering scars. Age, gender and fracture morphology did not affect the outcome. Revision surgery after secondary fracture dislocation did not show a worsened outcome compared to primary plate fixation. Physeal growth plate bridging implants did not worsen the outcome. The timing of implant removal within the first 6 months postoperatively did not affect long-term function. Conclusion: Plate fixation is a safe option in pediatric patients with limited growth potential and highly displaced PHFs. Plate fixation led to a good to excellent functional outcome, regardless of fracture morphology and implant positioning. A higher invasiveness and the need for implant removal must be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of anterolateral or posterolateral dual plating in patients who underwent surgery because of extra-articular fractures of the distal one-third of the humerus. Methods: Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years and were evaluated and compared with each other in terms of union time, surgery duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy shot count, iatrogenic nerve injury, infection, need for revision surgery, and elbow flexion-extension degrees and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores at the last follow-up. Results: Twenty patients (mean age 35.6 ± 5.4 years; range 25-47) who underwent surgery and received anterolateral dual-plate fixation were compared with 19 patients (mean age 34.7 ± 4.8 years; range 23-47) who underwent posterolateral dual-plate fixation between January 2018 and October 2021 (P > .05). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of sixth month DASH score, union time, elbow flexion, elbow extension, infection, iatrogenic nerve injury, or need for revision surgery (P > .05). However, the differences in duration of surgery and number of fluoroscopy shots between the groups were significant (P < .05). Conclusion: Because the patient lies in the supine position during anterolateral dual plating, there is a positional advantage over posterolateral dual plating, particularly in polytrauma patients. Anterolateral dual plating is a safer alternative to posterolateral dual plating because of the shorter preoperative preparation and the lower fluoroscopy shot counts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Neer type V distal clavicle fractures are considered the most unstable fracture type and are characterized by the disruption of continuity between the coracoclavicular (C-C) ligaments and proximal or distal bone fragments. However, owing to the rarity of such fractures, there is currently no universally accepted surgical procedure for their treatment. Recently, the scorpion plate, an anatomical, non-locking, pre-contoured plate with two grasping arms to fix the distal or inferior clavicular fragments, was introduced. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative functional and radiological outcomes of osteosynthesis using only scorpion plates in Neer type V fractures. Methods We retrospectively identified 23 patients who underwent scorpion plate fixation for Neer type V fractures at two general hospitals. All patients underwent only plate fixation without C-C ligament augmentation. Subsequently, we investigated their postoperative functional outcomes, complication rates, and modified C-C distance ratio at 1 year. Results The mean postoperative Constant score was 96 ± 5, with all cases achieving bone union. Complications within 1 year postoperatively included plate loosening in one patient (4.3%) and plate irritation in two patients (8.7%). Additionally, the modified C-C distance ratio averaged 114 ± 15%. Conclusions This study offers novel insights into the management of Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. Our findings indicate that osteosynthesis using only scorpion plates can lead to satisfactory functional outcomes with minimal complications.

Abstract Objective The effectiveness and safety of fibular intramedullary nail fixation (FINF) compared to plate fixation (PF) in treating ankle fractures among adults remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of FINF versus PF, aiming to provide orthopedic surgeons with valuable insights when choosing between the two internal fixation methods for patient treatment. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were systematically searched for articles comparing FINF and PF in ankle fractures among adults. Functional outcomes, complications, and bony union were compared between the implants. Results A total of seven studies were included in the study, involving 586 patients. The results revealed no statistically significant differences in functional outcomes between two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The outcomes favoring FINF comprised a lower infection rate (RR = 0.23, 95%CI, 0.11 to 0.47, P

Abstract Background Management of inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus remains controversial, and related research is sparse. The main intention of this study is to describe the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of pubis-ischium ramus fractures in Tile B pelvic injuries and to identify the feasibility and necessity of fixation of the inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus. Methods This study comprised two parts: a biomechanical test and a retrospective clinical study. For the biomechanical tests, Tile B-type pelvic injuries were modeled in six cadaver specimens by performing pubis-ischium osteotomies and disruption of the anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The superior and/or inferior rami of the pubis-ischium ramus were repaired with reconstruction plates and separated into three groups (A, B, and C). Specimens were placed in the standing position and were loaded axially with two-leg support for three cycles at 500 N. The displacements of sacroiliac joints at osteotomy were measured with Vernier calipers and compared using statistical software. To investigate the clinical outcomes of this technique, 26 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a superior ramus fixation group (Group D) and a combined superior and inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus fixation group (Group E). The main outcome measures were time of operation, blood loss, postoperative radiographic reduction grading, and functional outcomes. Results In the vertical loading test, Group E showed better pelvic ring stability than Group D (P

Abstract Background Intramedullary nail (IMN) and plate fixation are the most commonly used surgical modalities for distal tibia fractures. However, the superiority of their efficacy regarding functional outcomes and complications remains controversial. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these two modalities. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of IMN and plate fixation in distal tibia fractures were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library up to January 31, 2024. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effect model for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively. Results A total of 20 RCTs comprising 1528 patients were included. Compared with plate fixation, IMN significantly shortened surgery time (WMD=-10.73 min, 95%CI: -15.93 to -5.52), union time (WMD=-1.56 weeks, 95%CI: -2.82 to -0.30), and partial (WMD=-1.71 weeks, 95%CI: -1.91 to -0.43) and full (WMD=-2.61 weeks, 95%CI: -3.53 to -1.70) weight-bearing time. IMN was associated with markedly reduced risk of wound infection (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31–0.63) and secondary procedures (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.55–0.95), but increased the risk of malunion (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.02–2.30) and anterior knee pain (OR = 3.94, 95%CI: 1.68–9.28). The rates of nonunion, delayed union, and functional assessment scores did not significantly differ between the two groups. The percentages of patients obtaining an excellent functional outcome or an excellent and good functional outcome post-operation were comparable. Conclusions Both IMN and plate fixation are effective modalities for the surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures. IMN seems to be preferred since it confers more advantages, but the elevated rates of malunion and knee pain require attention. The decision on fixation modality should be tailored to the specific fracture, considering these pros and cons.

Background: The optimal treatment of open fractures complicated by soft tissue loss of pediatric tibial fractures remains inconclusive. The author described a protocol of concurrent plate fixation and pedicled flap coverage and retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of such injuries. Methods: A total of 25 pediatric cases with Gustilo lllB open tibial fracture were treated by single-stage plate fixation and pedicled flap reconstruction. The reviewed information consisted of time to fix and flap, type of plate, type of pedicled flap, fracture union time, postoperative complication and the clinical outcomes by objective scoring system. Results: Fix and flap was undergone between 7 and 12 days after injury with the average time of 8.2 days. Regarding the type of plate, narrow LCP was applied in 8, 3.5 mm precontoured LCP in 10, 5.0 mm precontoured in 2 and double LCP in 5. According to soft tissue reconstruction, the medial gastrocnemius flap was selected in 6 cases, myocutaneous medial gastrocnemius flap in 2, soleus flap in 3, hemisoleus flap in 5, reverse sural flap in 6 and combined medial gastrocnemius and hemisoleus flaps in 3. No flap-related complication was demonstrated. All cases established fracture union in between 12 and 24 weeks with an average time to union of 17.7 weeks. According to postoperative complications, infected plate occurred in 2 cases and implant irritation in 5. According to Puno functional score, excellent results were presented in 7 cases and good results in 18 cases. Conclusion: Single-stage plate fixation and pedicled flap coverage are a reliable regimen for pediatric open fractures complicated by soft tissue loss of the tibia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus remains controversial, and related research is sparse. The main intention of this study is to describe the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of pubis-ischium ramus fractures in Tile B pelvic injuries and to identify the feasibility and necessity of fixation of the inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus. Methods: This study comprised two parts: a biomechanical test and a retrospective clinical study. For the biomechanical tests, Tile B-type pelvic injuries were modeled in six cadaver specimens by performing pubis-ischium osteotomies and disruption of the anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The superior and/or inferior rami of the pubis-ischium ramus were repaired with reconstruction plates and separated into three groups (A, B, and C). Specimens were placed in the standing position and were loaded axially with two-leg support for three cycles at 500 N. The displacements of sacroiliac joints at osteotomy were measured with Vernier calipers and compared using statistical software. To investigate the clinical outcomes of this technique, 26 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a superior ramus fixation group (Group D) and a combined superior and inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus fixation group (Group E). The main outcome measures were time of operation, blood loss, postoperative radiographic reduction grading, and functional outcomes. Results: In the vertical loading test, Group E showed better pelvic ring stability than Group D (P < 0.05). However, the shift of the sacroiliac joints was almost identical among the three groups. In our clinical case series, all fractures in Group E achieved bony union. Group E demonstrated earlier weight-bearing functional exercise (2.54 ± 1.45 vs 4.77 ± 2.09; P = 0.004), earlier bony union (13.23 ± 2.89 vs 16.55 ± 3.11; P = 0.013), and better functional outcomes (89.77 ± 7.27 vs 82.38 ± 8.81; P = 0.028) than Group D. The incidence of sexual dysfunction was significantly lower in Group E than that in Group D (2/13 vs 7/13; P = 0.039). Bone nonunion occurred in two patients in Group D, and two patients in Group E had heterotopic ossification. None of the patients exhibited wound complications, infections, implant failures, or bone–implant interface failures. Conclusions: Fixation of the inferior ramus of a pubis-ischium ramus fracture based on conventional fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is mechanically superior in cadaveric Tile B pelvic injury and shows rapid recovery, good functional outcomes, and low incidence of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intramedullary nail (IMN) and plate fixation are the most commonly used surgical modalities for distal tibia fractures. However, the superiority of their efficacy regarding functional outcomes and complications remains controversial. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these two modalities. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of IMN and plate fixation in distal tibia fractures were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library up to January 31, 2024. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effect model for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 20 RCTs comprising 1528 patients were included. Compared with plate fixation, IMN significantly shortened surgery time (WMD=-10.73 min, 95%CI: -15.93 to -5.52), union time (WMD=-1.56 weeks, 95%CI: -2.82 to -0.30), and partial (WMD=-1.71 weeks, 95%CI: -1.91 to -0.43) and full (WMD=-2.61 weeks, 95%CI: -3.53 to -1.70) weight-bearing time. IMN was associated with markedly reduced risk of wound infection (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31–0.63) and secondary procedures (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.55–0.95), but increased the risk of malunion (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.02–2.30) and anterior knee pain (OR = 3.94, 95%CI: 1.68–9.28). The rates of nonunion, delayed union, and functional assessment scores did not significantly differ between the two groups. The percentages of patients obtaining an excellent functional outcome or an excellent and good functional outcome post-operation were comparable. Conclusions: Both IMN and plate fixation are effective modalities for the surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures. IMN seems to be preferred since it confers more advantages, but the elevated rates of malunion and knee pain require attention. The decision on fixation modality should be tailored to the specific fracture, considering these pros and cons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The recent literature is scarce regarding the outcomes of mid-shaft clavicular non-union treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with autologous bone grafting, and the influence of the type of initial treatment has not yet been investigated. The study aims: (1) to present the mid-term surgical results of mid-shaft clavicular non-unions treated by plate fixation with autologous bone grafting and (2) to determine the effect the type of initial treatment has on the surgical results. Material and Method: The study reviews 14 patients (eight females) who'd undergone ORIF with autologous bone grafting due to atrophic mid-shaft clavicular nonunion where clinical and radiographical outcomes were recorded. The study divides the patients into two groups based on their initial treatment: Group A (eight with non-surgical treatment) and Group B (six with surgical treatment). Result: The mean QuickDASH score at final follow-up was 22. The Constant Score significantly improved from 40 to 87 postoperatively. The mean Preoperative Visual Analogous Scale (VAS) score went down from 7 to 2 (p<0.001). A solid union was achieved in all patients. In the preoperative between-group comparison, no significant differences were observed for any of the clinical outcome. At final follow-up, Group A exhibited significantly higher Constant Scores. Conclusion: Regardless of the type of initial treatment, plate fixation with autologous bone grafting is effective in obtaining solid fusion and improving the clinical status of patients with mid-shaft clavicular non-union. Additionally, this technique can provide shorter time to union and greater improvements in specific shoulder function in patients who've undergone non-surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Open surgical approaches for the treatment of anterior pelvic arc lesions are associated with several complications. We present the first retrospective descriptive case series on the use of laparoscopy as an alternative. Methods: This descriptive, retrospective, single-centre study enrolled all patients who underwent laparoscopy for the treatment of pelvic ring disruption between May 2020 and March 2022. The primary outcome was the procedure failure rate based on conversion to open surgery. Secondary outcomes were the duration of the surgical procedure, x-ray exposure, length of hospitalisation, postoperative pain assessment, and functional scores at the last follow-up. Results: The study included two females and 12 males. The mean age of the study participants was 44.2 (23–67) years. In total, nine (64.3%) patients had pubic symphysis disjunction, four (28.6%) had bilateral fractures of the obturator frames, and one (7%) had both. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery. The median operating times for symphysis pubis disruption, obturator frame fracture, and patients with both injuries were 90.0 (60–120), 135 (105–180), and 240 min, respectively. The median overall operating time was 102.5 (60–240) min. The median Iowa Pelvic Score and Majeed Functional Score at the last follow-up were 87 (70–99) and 84 (70–100), respectively. Conclusion: Laparoscopic internal fixation is a reliable treatment for pelvic ring disruption. The clinical and radiological outcomes of our patients suggest the usefulness of this technique as an alternative to open approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction We present a detailed procedure for the robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis of an anterior acetabular fracture. The purpose of this work was to describe a robotic-assisted minimally invasive technique as a possible method for reducing complications, pain, and hospitalization. Another goal was to present technical recommendations and to assess potential pitfalls and problems of the new surgical approach. Methods Surgery was performed in an interdisciplinary setting by an experienced orthopedic surgeon and a urologist. The DaVinci System with standard instruments was used. Reduction was achieved through indirect traction of a pin that was introduced into the femoral neck and direct manipulation via the plate. The plate position and fixation were achieved through 7 additional minimally invasive incisions. Results The technique has multiple advantages, such as no detachment of the rectus abdominal muscle, a small skin incision, and minimal blood loss. Furthermore, this approach might lower the incidence of hernia formation, infection, and postoperative pain. Discussion We see the presented technique as a demanding yet progressive and innovative surgical method for treating acetabular fractures with indications for anterior plate fixation. Trial registration The study was approved by the local institutional review board (Nr. 248/18).

Abstract Background Locking plates are commonly used for the fixation of comminuted, periprosthetic and osteoporotic bone fractures. These plates are secured to the bone with screws, creating a stable connection with fixed angle between the plate and the screws. In this biomechanical in vitro study, our aim is to evaluate and compare the novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model with FDA approved classical locking plate. Methods Sawbone PCF-15 osteoporotic bone model was utilized to simulate osteoporotic bone conditions. Two screws were used to attach both the classical locking plate and the novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model to these bone models. The attachment strength of the screws to the bone blocks was measured by pull-out tests. Results Novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model exhibited an 84.38% stronger attachment to the osteoporotic bone model compared to the current locking plate model. Conclusions In conclusion, one of the important problems in the locking plates which is the high Pull-out risk of the locking spongious screws can been resolved with our proposed new model and has a chance of having a better purchase especially in osteoporotic bones.

Aims: The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates. Results: The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):227–235.

Background: Postoperative heel pain arising from prominent screw heads is a common complication following medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO). This study aims to present the clinicoradiographic outcomes of a novel MDCO technique, wherein intramedullary fixation of a conventional low-profile locking wedge plate is employed. Methods: A retrospective analysis, involving a comparison of clinical and radiographic parameters among consecutive patients who underwent MDCO was conducted. The patients were subjected to either intramedullary wedge plate fixation through the osteotomy site (IWPF group, n = 45 cases) or conventional cannulated screw fixation from the heel (CCSF group, n = 51 cases). Radiographic evaluation included measurement of hindfoot alignment angle, alignment ratio, and moment arm. Clinical outcomes were measured with the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) activities of daily living and sports subscales, before and at 6, 12, and ≥24 months postoperatively. The presence of heel pain was evaluated at the postoperative 6 and 12 months in both groups. Results: For both groups, a marked enhancement in all 3 radiographic parameters was observed. The extent of correction for all clinicoradiographic parameters demonstrated no statistically significant divergence between the 2 groups. However, the FAAM-Sports scores at the 6-month postoperative juncture exhibited a significant elevation in the IWPF group relative to the CCSF group. Importantly, no patient reported heel pain at postoperative 6 and 12 months in the IWPF group whereas the rates of patients having heel pain at postoperative 6 and 12 months were 56.8% (29 cases) and 33.3% (17 cases), respectively, in the CCSF group. Conclusion: Both techniques yield analogous postoperative clinical and radiographic enhancements. However, the utilization of IWPF promotes a swifter clinical improvement with respect to sports activities when juxtaposed with the CCSF from the calcaneal tuberosity. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Impending and complete pathologic fractures of the distal humerus are rare complications of metastatic cancer. Surgical treatment aims to quickly restore function and minimize pain. Plate and screw fixation (PSF) is a common method for addressing these lesions, but unlike in orthopaedic trauma, there are no clear guidelines for best management. While dual PSF theoretically provides better support and reduces the chance of reoperation due to tumor progression, single PSF is currently the more common choice. Between March 2008 and September 2021, 35 consecutive patients who underwent PSF for distal humerus metastasis or multiple myeloma were retrospectively reviewed. The proportion of patients who developed various postoperative complications, including infection, nonunion, deep vein thrombosis, tumor progression, and radial nerve palsy, as well as those requiring reoperation, was calculated. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-squared, and Fisher's exact test were used to investigate differences between the single and dual PSF groups with statistical significance defined as p ≤ 0.05. There was no significant difference (p = 0.259) in revision rate, although 3 of 21 (14.3 %) single PSF patients required reoperation compared to 0 of 14 (0.0 %) dual PSF patients. The revisions were performed in one patient due to refracture and in two patients due to tumor progression. Although not statistically significant, a larger percentage of single PSF patients developed a postoperative complication compared to dual PSF patients [odds ratio 0.42 (95 % confidence interval 0.071 to 2.5); p = 0.431]. Single PSF did lead to shorter operative time compared to dual PSF [p < 0.001]. Dual PSF is non-inferior to single PSF and potentially results in fewer reoperations and postoperative complications in distal humerus pathologic lesions, although it leads to longer operative time. The current study is limited by small sample size due to the rarity of distal humerus metastatic lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We present a detailed procedure for the robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis of an anterior acetabular fracture. The purpose of this work was to describe a robotic-assisted minimally invasive technique as a possible method for reducing complications, pain, and hospitalization. Another goal was to present technical recommendations and to assess potential pitfalls and problems of the new surgical approach. Methods: Surgery was performed in an interdisciplinary setting by an experienced orthopedic surgeon and a urologist. The DaVinci System with standard instruments was used. Reduction was achieved through indirect traction of a pin that was introduced into the femoral neck and direct manipulation via the plate. The plate position and fixation were achieved through 7 additional minimally invasive incisions. Results: The technique has multiple advantages, such as no detachment of the rectus abdominal muscle, a small skin incision, and minimal blood loss. Furthermore, this approach might lower the incidence of hernia formation, infection, and postoperative pain. Discussion: We see the presented technique as a demanding yet progressive and innovative surgical method for treating acetabular fractures with indications for anterior plate fixation. Trial registration: The study was approved by the local institutional review board (Nr. 248/18). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Locking plates are commonly used for the fixation of comminuted, periprosthetic and osteoporotic bone fractures. These plates are secured to the bone with screws, creating a stable connection with fixed angle between the plate and the screws. In this biomechanical in vitro study, our aim is to evaluate and compare the novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model with FDA approved classical locking plate. Methods: Sawbone PCF-15 osteoporotic bone model was utilized to simulate osteoporotic bone conditions. Two screws were used to attach both the classical locking plate and the novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model to these bone models. The attachment strength of the screws to the bone blocks was measured by pull-out tests. Results: Novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model exhibited an 84.38% stronger attachment to the osteoporotic bone model compared to the current locking plate model. Conclusions: In conclusion, one of the important problems in the locking plates which is the high Pull-out risk of the locking spongious screws can been resolved with our proposed new model and has a chance of having a better purchase especially in osteoporotic bones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Locked plating for distal femur fractures is widely recommended and used. We systematically reviewed clinical studies assessing the benefits and harms of fracture fixation with locked plates in AO/OTA Type 32 and 33 femur fractures. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database was performed. The studies included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and case series involving patients with distal femur fractures. Studies of other fracture patterns, studies conducted on children, pathological fractures, cadaveric studies, animal models, and those with non-clinical study designs were excluded. Results: 53 studies with 1788 patients were found to satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common harms were nonunion (14.8%), malunion (13%), fixation failure (5.3%), infection (3.7%), and symptomatic implant (3.1%). Time to full weight-bearing ranged from 5 to 24 weeks, averaging 12.3 weeks. The average duration of follow-up was 18.18 months, ranging from 0.5 to 108 months. Surgical time ranged between 40 and 540 min, with an average of 141 min. The length of stay in days was 12.7, ranging from 1 to 61. The average plate length was ten holes, ranging from 5 to 20 holes. Conclusion: This review aimed to systematically synthesize the available evidence on the risk associated with locked plating osteosynthesis in distal femur fractures. Nonunion is the most common harm and is the primary cause of reoperation. The overall combined risk of a major and critical complication (i.e., requiring reoperation) is approximately 20%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Calcaneus fractures Sanders type II have been historically treated with various modalities. However, few studies compared these procedures directly. The multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of operative procedures using Kirschner wires (K-wires), cannulated cancellous screws (CCSs) and plates. Between 2014 and 2020, 121 patients with Sanders type II calcaneus fractures were surgically treated in our group using K-wire (Group K: n = 31), CCS (Group C: n = 60) or plate (Group p: n = 30) fixation. We assessed the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and infection after operation as clinical outcomes and Böhler's and Preiss' angles as radiographic outcomes. The AOFAS scores of the 3 groups showed a significant difference, with Group P showing significantly inferior scores to Group C at 6 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up examination (p =.015 and p <.001, respectively). The rate of infection did not differ to a statistically significant extent, but the incidence in Group P tended to be higher in comparison to the other groups. Among the three groups, Böhler's angle did not differ to a statistically significant extent immediately after the operation (p =.113) or at the final follow-up examination (p =.383). Postoperatively, Preiss' angle did not differ to a statistically significant extent (p =.251) but was significantly smaller in the Group C at the final follow-up examination (p =.0331). In Sanders type II calcaneus fracture, CCS fixation may obtain the best functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy of intramedullary fixation (IF) vs. plate fixation (PF) in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.MethodsWe conducted a computerized search of the electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Medlineand Chinese Journal Full-text Database) from the establishment of the database to the end of November 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's “Risk of bias”. Comparisons between the two groups were based on 8 variables, including Constant score, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, surgery time, length of incision, hospital stay; time to union, blood loss and infection.ResultsThirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising a total of 928 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that IF can benefit midshaft clavicle fractures with a reduced surgery time and hospital stay, a smaller incision, a better shoulder function (DASH score), shorter time to union and lower rate of infection compared with PF. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of Constant score at 12-month follow-up.ConclusionIF is superior to PF for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.

Distal tibial fracture is the most commonly seen type of fracture of the lower extremities. Both intramedullary nail fixation (INF) and plate fixation (PF) have been used to treat distal tibial fractures, but the best way to treat them is still in dispute. The purpose of this meta‐analysis is to compare INF versus PF fixation with respect to the incidence of injury. For studies that have been published between inception and June 2023, a systematic review has been carried out on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Scientific databases. All of the trials that looked at INF and PF‐related complications were enrolled. Data from the 13 primary results were analysed with RevMan 5.3. The meta‐analyses comprised 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). INF indicates that there is a tendency for patients with distal tibia fractures to reduce the risk of operative site infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40, 3.13; p = 0.0003) after surgery compared with PF. INF resulted in a reduction in total wound complications (OR, 14.20; 95% CI, 1.81, 111.57; p = 0.01) but shortened operation time (mean difference, 13.03; 95% CI, 2.08, 23.99; p = 0.02). In view of these findings, INF seems to be a preferred method of surgery for the treatment of distal tibial fractures with respect to the reduction of post‐operative wound complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Optimal surgical fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains a subject of debate, particularly regarding the superiority between screw fixation and plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach (STA). This review aims to determine the preferred treatment for DIACF and compare the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery options. Methods: Our study involved thorough searches across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, to identify all relevant publications on distal intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus (DIACFs) that were fixed using cannulated screws or plates via STA. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, we evaluated several outcomes, including post-operative function, radiological measurements, and complications. Result: A total of 728 patients from 7 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 435 patients underwent screw fixation via STA, and 373 patients underwent plate fixation via STA. The study found no statistically significant differences between the screw fixation and the plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach (STA) in terms of AOFAS scores, Bohler's angle, Gissane's angle, sural nerve injury, secondary subtalar arthrodesis and reoperation. Compared with screw fixation, plate fixation via STA can reduce reduction loss of Bohler's angle (WMD = − 1.64, 95% CI = [− 2.96, − 0.31], P = 0.06, I2 = 59%), lower the incidence of fixation failure (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.13, 0.81], P = 0.78, I2 = 0%), and decrease intra-articular step-off (WMD = − 0.52, 95% CI = [− 0.87, − 0.17], P = 0.66, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Plate fixation demonstrates superior capability in restoring calcaneal width, maintaining Bohler's angle, and minimizing intra-articular step-off, thereby maintaining better reduction of the subtalar articular surface. In addition, plate fixation exhibits the modest complication rate and a low incidence of fixation failure. Therefore, we recommend the use of plate fixation through the STA, especially for complex and comminuted intra-articular calcaneal fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to compare radiological and functional outcomes and complication rates between intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plate fixation for diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescents via an age-matched analysis. Methods: Data were collected from medical records at 11 hospitals from 2009 to 2019, and the age-matched study was conducted between IMN and plate fixation. Functional outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative complication rates were compared. Results: The IMN group (Group N) and plate fixation group (Group P) each comprised 26 patients after age matching. The mean age after matching was 13.42 years old. Bone maturities at the wrist of the radius and ulna were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.764 and p = 1). At the last follow-up period, functional outcomes using the Price criteria were over 90% in both groups, and the rotational range of motion was comparable to that of the healthy side. Over 70% of cases in Group N were performed by closed reduction, and operation time was half that of Group P. Postoperative neurological symptoms and refractures were more common in Group P than in Group N, although not statistically significantly so. Conclusions: Treatment outcomes for age-matched adolescent diaphyseal forearm fractures were excellent with IMN, as well as with plate fixation in many cases despite fewer complications, better cosmesis, and shorter operative times with IMN. IMN for diaphyseal forearm fractures is a useful treatment option even in adolescents although the indications for the best procedure to perform should be considered depending on individual patient needs. Level of evidence IV: Multicenter retrospective study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

More and more meta‐analyses have been conducted to compare the effects of intramedullary fixation (IF) and plate fixation (PF) on the outcome of midshaft clavicle fractures. It can affect the doctors' treatment decisions. A number of studies have been conducted in order to assist surgeons in selecting optimal operative procedures and to recommend operative treatment of clavicle fractures in accordance with the best available research. Our analysis of the IF and PF of clavicle fractures was done through a search for PubMed, Emabase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two different researchers analysed the research literature for quality of analysis and data extraction. The analysis of the data was done with RevMan 5.3. The 95% CI and OR models have been computed by means of either fixed‐dose or randomize. In addition, RCT in 114 references have been reviewed and added for further analysis. It is concluded that the application of plate and intramedullary fixation in the middle clavicle operation has remarkable influence on the outcome of post‐operation. There was a lower risk of postoperative wound infection in IF (OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.46, 14.27 p < 0.0001), smaller surgical incisions (MD, 6.57; 95% CI, 4.90, 8.25 p < 0.0001), and shorter operative time (MD, 17.09; 95% CI 10.42, 23.77 p < 0.0001), less blood loss (MD, 63.62; 95% CI, 55.84, 71.39 p < 0.0001) and shorter hospital stay (MD, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.84, 1.25 p < 0.0001). However, there is no statistical significance in the incidence of wound dehiscence. Thus, the effect of IF on the incidence of injury is better than that of the inner plate in the middle of the clavicle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the surgical technique and the outcome of a case series of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33C) treated with a nail-plate combination (NPC) implant. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a case series of 14 patients with comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (DFF) treated with an intramedullary retrograde nail in combination with a lateral low-contact condylar locking plate, in a period between June 2020 and January 2023 at a Level 1 trauma center. Baseline demographic and clinical data were recorded. Time to bone healing, function using Schatzker Lambert Score, and complications were documented. Results: Fourteen patients, 8 males and 6 females, with a total of 15 NPC implants, were included in this study. Eight out of 14 patients had open fractures, all with a Gustilo Anderson type IIIA exposure. The mean age was 48.5 ± 18.05 years. The median follow-up was 392 days, with only one patient lost to follow-up. 11 out of 15 implants achieved complete radiographic consolidation during follow-up, at a mean of 5.40 ± 1.07 months. At the 12-month follow-up, all patients could fully bear weight painlessly or with mild pain. Schatzker Lambert Score was excellent for 4 patients, good for 2 patients, fair for 5 patients, and failure for 2 patients. The main postoperative complications were rigidity (3 cases), limb shortening (2 cases), and septic non-union (1 case). Conclusion: This study suggests that the nail-plate combination (NPC) may provide a more effective surgical technique for addressing the challenges associated with comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33C). Level of evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the results of surgically treating olecranon fractures using tension band wire versus plate fixation. Due to more complicated injuries, we hypothesise that plate fixation patients would have much worse outcomes. Methodology: This retrospective cohort analysis recruited 108 patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent surgery. There were 40 patients, of whom 20 had received tension band wiring treatment, and 20 had received plating fixation treatment. The Weseley Score is an active grading system that assigns consequences into three categories, from superb to fair, based on information concerning discomfort and loss of function. The intensity of pain, range of mobility, stability, and everyday function are all considered by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), a mixed subjective and objective grading score. Results: The two fracture types with the highest prevalence, according to the Mayo classification, were a 2b-type fracture in the plate fixation group (70%) and a 2a-type fracture in the tension band wiring group (80%). The tension band wiring group had 70% more "A" fractures than the plate fixation group, which had 45% more "D" fractures, according to the Schatzker classification. The mean hospitalization duration of tension band wiring group was comparitively high than plate fixation (10.9 ± 9.6 vs 7.8 ± 9.8). The median DASH Score for the TBW group was 7.8 (3.5-13.6), whereas for the plate fixation group it was 12.3 (5.4-24.7). In 21 instances, the Wesley Score showed extraordinary performance. In contrast to nine cases and eight patients in the TBW group, nine cases in the PF group showed remarkable results. Conclusion: In conclusion, both treatments depend on several elements, such as physical prerequisites, bone quality, and fracture patterns, to be successful. We predicted that individuals with PF would have far worse functional outcomes from more challenging surgical procedures and traumas. The extensive plate-fixing practice had no discernible harmful effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Fractures of the femoral diaphysis are associated with a risk of morbidity in children. Various fixation methods have been developed, but with only limited evidence to support their use. This systematic review assesses the evidence regarding clinical outcomes of closed femoral diaphyseal fractures in children treated with plate fixation or flexible intramedullary nails. Methods: A PROSPERO-registered, PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science (WoS) databases were searched from inception to February 2023. Inclusion criteria included clinical studies reporting adverse outcomes following surgical treatment of pediatric closed femoral diaphyseal fractures using plate fixation and flexible intramedullary nails. The ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools evaluated the risk of bias. Results: Thirteen papers (2 prospective randomized controlled trials and 11 retrospective cohorts) reported 805 closed diaphyseal femoral fractures in 801 children (559 males, 242 females). There were 360 plate fixations and 445 flexible intramedullary nails. Two cases of osteomyelitis and one nonunion were reported. Meta-analysis showed that plate fixation had a lower risk of soft tissue infection (relative risk 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.07–0.92)). There was no difference in the following outcomes: malunion (relative risk 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.32–1.44)); unplanned reoperation (relative risk 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.31–1.14)), and leg-length difference (relative risk 1.58 (95% confidence interval 0.66–3.77)). The risk of bias was high in all studies. Conclusions: An analysis of 805 fractures with minimal differences in meta-analyses is considered high quality even when the quality of the evidence is low. The findings are limited by important flaws in the methodology in the published literature. Well-designed multicentre prospective studies using standardized core outcomes are required to advise treatment recommendations. Level of evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to compare the torsional resistance of three fixation techniques for spiral metacarpal fractures: screw-only fixation, screw plus neutralization plate fixation, and a locking plate construct. A spiral fracture was created on 18 cadaveric metacarpal bones by applying an axial and torsional loading force using an Instron 3343 mechanical tester. The failure strength was defined as the native torque strength. The fractures were divided into three groups and fixed using each of the three techniques. The repaired bones were loaded to failure to determine the post-repair strength. The neutralization plate group conferred a post-repair torque (278.6 Nmm) that was similar to the native torque (292 Nmm) with a diminution of only 4.5% and appeared to provide the best resistance to torsion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Multiple metacarpal shaft fractures are higher-energy injuries than single metacarpal shaft injuries and are considered relatively unstable because reduction is easily lost after splinting. However, few studies have been published on operative treatment because these fractures are rare. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of this rare type of fracture and report the surgical outcomes. Methods: Medical records of patients with adjacent metacarpal shaft fractures who underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 20 cases were included in this study. A single longitudinal incision was made at the middle of the web space of affected metacarpal bones. Fractures were fixed using a plate and screws. The clinical results were evaluated by determining the metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and hand grip strength at the final follow-up. Results: Among the patients included, there were fifteen male and five female patients. Their mean age was 41.2 years. The average range of motion of metacarpophalangeal joints was 78.1°. The average DASH score was 6.5. The average hand grip strength was 92.4% compared to the unaffected side. The mean time to union was 7.5 weeks. There were no cases of complications, such as soft tissue infections, joint stiffness, or extensor tendon injuries. Conclusion: Plate fixation through a single incisional approach performed for adjacent metacarpal shaft fractures showed satisfactory results. This could be a recommendable approach for two unstable adjoining metacarpal shaft fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although intramedullary screw fixation is commonly performed for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures, high rates of nonunion, refracture, and hardware prominence have been reported. The Jones Specific Implant (JSI) is a novel surgical implant which contours to the native curvature of the fifth metatarsal allowing for a more anatomic fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term complication rates and outcomes of patients treated with the JSI to other fixation types such as plates and intramedullary screws. Electronic records were queried for adult patients with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures who underwent primary fixation from 2010 to 2021. All patients were treated by a foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeon with intramedullary screws, plates, or JSI (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL). Visual analog scale (VAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) were recorded and compared using univariate statistics. Eighty-five patients underwent fixation using intramedullary screw (n = 51, 60%), plate (n = 22, 25.9%), or JSI (n = 12, 14.1%) with a mean follow-up of 11.1 ± 14.6 months. The total cohort demonstrated a significant improvement in VAS pain (p <.0001) as well as AOFAS (p <.0001) scores. When comparing the cohort treated with JSI and the cohort treated with all other types of fixation, there were no significant differences in postoperative VAS or AOFAS scores. Only 3 complications, one with JSI (3.5%) required removal of the symptomatic hardware. The JSI is a novel treatment for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures, with similar early outcomes and complication rates when compared with intramedullary screw and plate fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Plate fixation using a tricortical iliac bone graft can provide a high ratio of bone union and restore clavicle length in cases of atrophic nonunion. However, the surgical treatment of clavicle oblique nonunions with marked shortening deformity remains challenging and unresolved. Here, we describe a case of clavicle oblique nonunion with shortening that was treated using plate fixation with parallelogram prism iliac bone grafts. Case presentation A 46-year-old man presented to our hospital with severe medial scapular pain. He had been diagnosed with a right clavicle mid-shaft fracture in a motorcycle accident 9 months earlier. He underwent conservative treatment, but radiographs and computed tomography showed clavicle oblique nonunion with marked shortening. Physical examination revealed no pain at the nonunion site; however, tenderness was noted on the medial side of the right scapula and protrusion of the inferior scapular angle was prominent. His symptoms interfered with daily life and required surgery. After release of the nonunion, we harvested the parallelogram prism bone grafts from the iliac crest. We inserted these bone grafts into the fracture ends and fixed them with lag screws, after which we performed plate fixation. Immediately after surgery, right medial scapular pain and scapula winging subsided. Bone union was achieved, and the length of the clavicle was restored at 9 months postoperatively. Conclusions This case report provides new information on the surgical treatment of clavicle oblique nonunion with shortening deformity. The presence of medial scapular pain and winging scapula can be clinically problematic in cases of clavicle nonunion with marked shortening. Our case revealed that reliable bone union and clavicle length recovery can be achieved with plate fixation and iliac bone grafts.

The recommended treatment strategy for stage 3 bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is currently rigid plate fixation without bone reconstruction. However, a recent systematic review indicated the utility of microsurgical reconstruction after resection of BRONJ. Several types of flaps have been described but their applications are controversial. Here we present a detailed reconstruction plan for obtaining better outcomes in patients with maxillary and mandibular BRONJ. Given that progressive maxillary BRONJ is often invasive to the skin, including the eyelid, leading to functional loss such as leakage of discharge and ectropion, several revision surgeries are needed to increase the volume in the defect after the free flap transfer. For progressive mandibular BRONJ, hemi-mandibulectomy to subtotal mandibulectomy with an adequate margin from the necrotic bone is necessary, followed by a well-designed fibular free flap.

Background: Operative fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is considered the gold standard, for which multiple fixation methods are available. This study compares the (functional) outcome of screw fixation (SF), plate fixation (PF), and anatomical plate fixation (APF) via the sinus tarsi approach (STA). Methods: A total of 239 patients (265 fractured calcanei) who received surgical treatment of a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture via STA between 2011 and 2022 were included. Results: Böhler angle (BA) measured immediately postoperatively (BA post-OR) and the decrease in BA at 1 year (∆BA) differed significantly in favor of PF/APF compared with SF (BA post-OR: SF vs PF P =.010 and SF vs APF P =.001; ∆BA: SF vs PF P =.032 and SF vs APF P =.042). Implant removal surgery was performed significantly less in the APF group as compared to the SF/PF groups (APF vs SF/PF; 9.9% vs 22.9%/23.7%, P =.015). Surgical site infections and secondary arthrodesis of the subtalar joint occurred equally in the 3 groups. Furthermore, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index score, and EuroQOL-5D-index / visual analog scale score, did not differ notably between SF, PF, and APF. Conclusion: The results show that both PF and APF are favored over SF because of an improved correction of BA measured directly postoperatively, a lower secondary loss of BA and, for APF, a lower implant removal rate. There was no difference in the rate of surgical site infections, need for secondary arthrodesis, nor functional outcome scores between different implants using the STA. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Zygoma fractures are common injuries due to their prominent nature and proper treatment is important to achieve functional and esthetic results. Anatomical reduction and plate fixation are crucial in the treatment of zygomatic fractures. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the surgical treatment results and outcomes of surgical treatment results. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from the hospital registry system. Age, sex, concomitant diseases, smoking history, etiology, type of fracture, accompanying fractures, methods used for treatment, complications, length of hospital stay, and time from diagnosis to surgery were retrospectively recorded. SPSS version 26.0 was used for data analysis. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the types of fractures seen in traffic accidents, falls, and assaults, which are the most common causes of etiology (P = 0.14). No statistically significant difference was observed between the number of plates used for fixation and the presence of complications (P = 0.90). However, the incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients with at least one fixed plate than in those without (P = 0.017). Conclusion: High-energy Types B and C injuries are more common in surgically treated zygoma cases. Based on our analyze, we believe that open anatomical reduction is most important step in treatment. Plate fixation should be preferred when it is necessary to maintain stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report our experience of preoperative plate contouring for periarticular fractures using three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology and describe its benefits. We enrolled 34 patients, including 11 with humerus midshaft fractures, 12 with tibia plateau fractures, 2 with pilon fractures, and 9 with acetabulum fractures. The entire process of plate contouring over the 3DP model was videotaped and retrospectively analyzed. The total time and number of trials for the intraoperative positioning of precontoured plates and any further intraoperative contouring events were prospectively recorded. The mismatch between the planned and postoperative plate positions was evaluated. The average plate contouring time was 9.2 min for humerus shaft, 13.8 min for tibia plateau fractures, 8.8 min for pilon fractures, and 11.6 min for acetabular fractures. Most precontoured plates (88%, 30/34) could sit on the planned position without mismatch. In addition, only one patient with humerus shaft fracture required additional intraoperative contouring. Preoperative patient specific periarticular plate contouring using a 3DP model is a simple and efficient method that may alleviate the surgical challenges involved in plate contouring and positioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]