Search

Complex implant prosthetic reconstruction poses several challenges. The lost anatomy of periodontium due to trauma or long-standing missing teeth, especially in esthetic area, requires several surgical visits for recovery. The augmentation procedures are technique sensitive and unpredictable and need long commitment from the patient. They are time-consuming and expensive, and patients are often unwilling. The alternative for anatomically deficient partial edentulous sites could be prosthetic gingival restoration. They help in re-establishing natural contours, interproximal papilla, and further eliminating complex procedures. The other advantage is perfect horizontal and vertical transition between the prosthesis and adjacent tissues. This article describes two cases of completed gingival prosthetic prosthesis which corrected the missing architectures around lost teeth. It was well accepted by the patients and can be an alternative for unpredictable regenerative procedures.

Complex implant prosthetic reconstruction poses several challenges. The lost anatomy of periodontium due to trauma or long-standing missing teeth, especially in esthetic area, requires several surgical visits for recovery. The augmentation procedures are technique sensitive and unpredictable and need long commitment from the patient. They are time-consuming and expensive, and patients are often unwilling. The alternative for anatomically deficient partial edentulous sites could be prosthetic gingival restoration. They help in re-establishing natural contours, interproximal papilla, and further eliminating complex procedures. The other advantage is perfect horizontal and vertical transition between the prosthesis and adjacent tissues. This article describes two cases of completed gingival prosthetic prosthesis which corrected the missing architectures around lost teeth. It was well accepted by the patients and can be an alternative for unpredictable regenerative procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Use of pink gingival ceramics can reduce the necessity for extensive surgical procedures attempting to restore missing soft and hard tissues in the maxillary esthetic zone. Selecting the appropriate shade for pink porcelain poses a challenge, especially when the patient presents with a high smile line. This paper describes a simple and effective technique to facilitate shade selection for gingival ceramics to match the patient's existing gingival shade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of race, age, and gender on Commision Internationale de l'Eclairage Lab color space (CIELAB) values of attached gingival colors. The color coordinates of an optimal proposed attached gingival shade guide were also determined. Material and Methods Participants (n = 120) were recruited to fulfill the following stratification of five age groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-85, with four racial categories (white, black, Asian, and others) and balanced for gender. Reflectance measurements of participants' attached gingiva were made using a spectroradiometer and Xenon arc lamp with a 45/0 optical configuration. A stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out to identify gingival color contribution from race, age, and gender. A hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify color groups that clustered together. The coverage error of the proposed shade guide was calculated to the original gingival color. Results The stepwise discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference in gingival color contribution from the factors evaluated. Significant influence was found for the race/gender factors ( p < 0.05), but not for age. The cluster analysis results revealed three cluster centroids with mean L*a*b* as follows: (1 = 51.0 ± 4.2, 27.7 ± 4.7, 18.3 ± 3.2), (2 = 61.4 ± 4.5, 24.3 ± 4.3, 17.6 ± 2.3), and (3 = 36.1 ± 4.1, 21 ± 4.9, 16 ± 5.2). The coverage errors to the following racial categories were: Asian (ΔE = 6.0 ± 4.8), black (ΔE = 6.7 ± 3.9), others (ΔE = 5.8 ± 2.9), and white (ΔE = 4.6 ± 2.7). Conclusions The study showed that L*a*b* was significantly affected by race and gender. Clustering analysis was able to identify clusters in 120 participants for three gingival tones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]