Search

Diagnosing Alzheimers disease (AD) poses significant challenges to health care, often resulting in delayed or inadequate patient care. The clinical integration of blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) for AD holds promise in enabling early detection of pathology and timely intervention. However, several critical considerations, such as the lack of consistent guidelines for assessing cognition, limited understanding of BBM test characteristics, insufficient evidence on BBM performance across diverse populations, and the ethical management of test results, must be addressed for widespread clinical implementation of BBMs in the United States. The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimers Disease BBM Workgroup convened to address these challenges and provide recommendations that underscore the importance of evidence-based guidelines, improved training for health-care professionals, patient empowerment through informed decision making, and the necessity of community-based studies to understand BBM performance in real-world populations. Multi-stakeholder engagement is essential to implement these recommendations and ensure credible guidance and education are accessible to all stakeholders.

Blood-based biomarkers (BBM) for Alzheimers disease (AD) are being increasingly used in clinical practice to support an AD diagnosis. In contrast to traditional diagnostic modalities, such as amyloid positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, BBMs offer a more accessible and lower cost alternative for AD biomarker testing. Their unique scalability addresses the anticipated surge in demand for biomarker testing with the emergence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) that require confirmation of amyloid pathology. To facilitate the uptake of BBMs in clinical practice, The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimers Disease convened a BBM Workgroup to provide recommendations for two clinical implementational pathways for BBMs: one for current use for triaging and another for future use to confirm amyloid pathology. These pathways provide a standardized diagnostic approach with guidance on interpreting BBM test results. Integrating BBMs into clinical practice will simplify the diagnostic process and facilitate timely access to DMTs for eligible patients.

Background: Rare diseases (RDs) are a heterogeneous group of complex and low-prevalence conditions in which the time to establish a definitive diagnosis is often too long. In addition, for most RDs, few to no treatments are available and it is often difficult to find a specialized care team. Objectives: The project "acERca las enfermedades raras" (in English: "bringing RDs closer") is an initiative primary designed to generate a consensus by a multidisciplinary group of experts to detect the strengths and weaknesses in the public healthcare system concerning the comprehensive care of persons living with a RD (PLWRD) in the region of Catalonia, Spain, where a Network of Clinical Expert Units (Xarxa d'Unitats de Expertesa Clínica or XUEC) was created and is being implemented since 2015. The additional primary aim was to propose recommendations to solve or improve the limitations found. Methods: A task force of 13 participants with multidisciplinary expertise on RDs completed a questionnaire and participated in two focus groups. A document was drafted with an item series of strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system regarding the care of PLWRD, and a set of proposals or recommendations to overcome the problems identified. Results: The Catalan Government healthcare model of XUECs for the comprehensive care for RDs is currently valid and adapted to the needs of PLWRD and their families since its strategic optimal and operational framework, and it is aligned with the European Reference Networks (ERNs) thematic areas. The problems found in the current healthcare model were grouped into ten main areas: (1) the healthcare model for RDs; (2) coordination with primary healthcare providers and other tertiary and secondary hospitals; (3) access to and coordination with non-medical services; (4) the role of case manager in the XUEC; (5) genetic diagnosis; (6) undiagnosed patients; (7) treatments; (8) referring process, continuous follow-up, and transition from pediatric to adult centers; (9) research and education for professionals; and (10) associations of PLWRD and their families (patients' advocacy). The need for more resources was currently detected as the common factor for most of them. Ten key recommendations to improve the healthcare system regarding RDs were postulated. Conclusions: Catalonia has established a unique healthcare model for RDs in Spain, with clear strengths and advantages. However, after analyzing them, the experts suggested that new governmental political and administrative decisions are needed to ensure the efficient implementation of a healthcare plan for PLWRD in Catalonia, which could be applied to other regions and nations worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysautonomia refers to any disorder involving altered function of the autonomic nervous system. Dysautonomia can be debilitating as it often affects multiple organ systems. The diagnostic journey for individuals affected by dysautonomia can be hindered by symptom overlap with other conditions and by limited access to autonomic specialists. The present patient-reported outcome study aims to characterize the diagnostic journey of 672 adult individuals affected by different types of dysautonomia. The average time to diagnosis was 7.7 years (SD 10 years) and diagnosis was made primarily by cardiologists, followed by neurologists, and internists or primary care physicians. Common comorbid conditions are Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, mast cell disorders, vitamin deficiency, fibromyalgia, and myalgic encephalomyelitis, all of which can contribute to the symptoms burden and can potentially confound the diagnostic process. We suggest that the prolonged time to diagnosis contributes to morbidity and compounds the psychological and economic burden of dysautonomia. Raising awareness about the numerous obstacles that hinder the diagnostic process among both clinicians and dysautonomia patients is the first step to reduce morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) represents a pivotal shift from volume-based to outcome-driven quality metrics centered on patient-valued outcomes. This approach requires collaboration across all participants in the health care value chain; providers, payers, pharma, policymakers and patients (collectively known as the 5Ps). Despite substantial theoretical endorsement of VBHC's potential for improving health outcomes and system efficiency, empirical evidence detailing its practical implementation remains limited. This field study evaluates the real-word implementation of VBHC within a health care organization. Methods: In 2022, a health care collaboration Think Tank initiated this investigation during a breakout session, gathering insights from 12 leading international organizations to construct an empirical VBHC transformation reference guide. Real-world data was collected through structured interviews over a 1-year period, covering the 5 P value chain in various healthcare settings. The VBHC initiatives were analyzed through four stages: initiation, data acquisition, collaborative frameworks, and results evaluation. Results: The 12 interviews identified five key enablers for successful VBHC implementation: 1. Organizational Purpose: defining core motivators for change; 2. People: identifying pivotal roles and leadership to endorse change; 3. Resources: securing personnel and financial support; 4. Data Infrastructure: developing interoperable IT systems for effective data sharing and collection; 5. Execution: prioritizing sustained implementation processes. Conclusion: The findings highlight that VBHC implementation and adoption is complex and requires incremental advancements, dedicated leadership, and resilient strategic framework spanning over multiple years. A comprehensive understanding of patient populations, risk stratification, and appropriate outcome metrics are essential to measure and deliver the VBHC transformation. Executive endorsement and transition funding during the transformation process are paramount to support this systemic shift. Collaboration among all 5 P stakeholders is essential for success. This field study underscores the importance of continuous learning and adaptation, providing a practical guide to enhance health care quality and efficiency that serves all stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMethodsResultsConclusion\nIMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONTo explore the experiences of long-term sick-listed employees and those of employers with communication and collaboration during sick leave and the return-to-work (RTW) process.Previously long-term sick-listed employees (N = 9) and employers (N = 9) were interviewed about their experiences with communication and collaboration during sick leave and RTW. Thematic analysis, utilizing patient journey mapping was applied to analyze and map out their experiences.Three central themes emerged from the analysis: 1. Maintaining communication between employees and employers during early sick leave stages fostered trust and enabled discussions about RTW, lowering the barriers for engaging in RTW activities. 2. Organizing joint meetings involving employees, employers, and occupational health professionals (OHPs) helped align expectations and facilitated shared decision-making to navigate RTW. 3. Both employees and employers reported lacking knowledge of RTW legislation and feeling reliant on OHP guidance to navigate the RTW process.Employees and employers underscored the need to be involved, supported, and well informed during the sick leave and RTW process. Both parties mentioned that early and ongoing communication, joint meetings with OHPs, and information on RTW legislation were important prerequisites.Being involved, supported, and well informed are central needs of long-term sick-listed employees and their employers during sick leave and the return-to-work (RTW) process.Occupational health professionals (OHPs) organizing early joint conversations with both long-term sick-listed employees and employers, helps to facilitate shared decision making, align expectations, and provides a supportive foundation for RTW activities.OHPs should provide clear, actionable and context-specific advice to support long-term sick-listed employees and their employers to develop and implement tailored RTW plans.Both long-term sick-listed employees and employers require clear information about their obligations and shared responsibilities under national RTW legislation to actively undertake necessary RTW activities and stimulate autonomy.Being involved, supported, and well informed are central needs of long-term sick-listed employees and their employers during sick leave and the return-to-work (RTW) process.Occupational health professionals (OHPs) organizing early joint conversations with both long-term sick-listed employees and employers, helps to facilitate shared decision making, align expectations, and provides a supportive foundation for RTW activities.OHPs should provide clear, actionable and context-specific advice to support long-term sick-listed employees and their employers to develop and implement tailored RTW plans.Both long-term sick-listed employees and employers require clear information about their obligations and shared responsibilities under national RTW legislation to actively undertake necessary RTW activities and stimulate autonomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a debilitating inflammatory disease with a profound impact on quality of life for affected patients and caregivers. The patient journey in hidradenitis begins with symptom onset and proceeds through diagnosis and treatment. It is fraught with misdiagnosis, lack of awareness, misinformation, and inappropriate treatments that lead to shame, blame, isolation, and medical mistrust. This review highlights the relationship between hidradenitis and quality of life, emphasizing the patient journey and opportunities to improve care along its tortuous course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "What is Occluding Our Understanding of Retinal Vein Occlusion?" published in Ophthalmology & Therapy discusses the rising prevalence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and the complexity of its pathogenesis. It emphasizes the need to address unmet needs within the RVO patient journey by leveraging advancements in imaging, biomarkers, and novel treatments. The text highlights gaps in understanding the pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment strategies for RVO, calling for individualized care and improved diagnostic investigations. The article also discusses recent clinical trials investigating faricimab and the potential of dual inhibition therapy in improving outcomes for patients with RVO. [Extracted from the article]

Data curation for a hospital-based cancer registry heavily relies on the labor-intensive manual abstraction process by cancer registrars to identify cancer-related information from free-text electronic health records. To streamline this process, a natural language processing system incorporating a hybrid of deep learning-based and rule-based approaches for identifying lung cancer registry-related concepts, along with a symbolic expert system that generates registry coding based on weighted rules, was developed. The system is integrated with the hospital information system at a medical center to provide cancer registrars with a patient journey visualization platform. The embedded system offers a comprehensive view of patient reports annotated with significant registry concepts to facilitate the manual coding process and elevate overall quality. Extensive evaluations, including comparisons with state-of-the-art methods, were conducted using a lung cancer dataset comprising 1428 patients from the medical center. The experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of the developed system, consistently achieving F1-scores of 0.85 and 1.00 across 30 coding items. Registrar feedback highlights the system’s reliability as a tool for assisting and auditing the abstraction. By presenting key registry items along the timeline of a patient’s reports with accurate code predictions, the system improves the quality of registrar outcomes and reduces the labor resources and time required for data abstraction. Our study highlights advancements in cancer registry coding practices, demonstrating that the proposed hybrid weighted neural-symbolic cancer registry system is reliable and efficient for assisting cancer registrars in the coding workflow and contributing to clinical outcomes.

Background: Few studies have assessed patient-reported experience measures in nephropathic cystinosis. This study uses patient reports focused on the impact of cystinosis, cysteamine treatment-associated problems, and therapeutic adherence and suggests potential actions for improvement. Methods: In March 2022, six patients with nephropathic cystinosis treated with cysteamine, aged between 12 and 40 years as well as two caregivers, underwent standardized online interviews. Further, in April 2022, two online workshops were organized, each one with the participation of an advisory board consisting of up to four patients and six caregivers. As a result, the first patient journey mapping was developed considering pre-diagnosis, diagnosis and post-diagnosis steps, prescription of treatment, laboratory tests and daily life for patients, categorized by age (children, teenagers, adults). A patient support programme was also considered. Results: Patients were not completely aware of the risks associated with non-adherence. The main factors explaining poor adherence were impaired sleep and chronic fatigue, both related to cysteamine night dosing and prominent gastrointestinal symptoms. These factors have a negative impact on the daily lives of patients. Opportunities for improvement in disease management and therapeutic adherence in nephropathic cystinosis were highlighted. Consequently, a series of lines of action and suggestions were made. Conclusion: This qualitative study offers insights on nephropathic cystinosis from the point of view of patients and parents/caregivers. The critical steps during patient journey and the pitfalls for therapeutic adherence have been highlighted, opening ways to improve not only disease management but also the quality of life of patients with cystinosis. A lay summary is provided as supplementary material; available at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/dic.2024-7-1-Suppl-Lay-Summary.pdf

Abstract Background Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of rare metabolic diseases with heterogeneous presentations, leading to substantial diagnostic challenges, which are poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate this diagnostic journey by examining families’ and professionals’ experiences. Results and discussion A questionnaire was designed for CDG families and professionals, garnering 160 and 35 responses, respectively. Analysis revealed the lack of seizures as a distinctive feature between PMM2-CDG (11.2%) with Other CDG (57.7%) at symptom onset. Hypotonia and developmental disability were prevalent symptoms across all studied CDG. Feeding problems were identified as an early onset symptom in PMM2-CDG (Cramer’s V (V) = 0.30, False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 3.8 × 10− 9), and hypotonia in all studied CDG (V = 0.34, FDR = 7.0 × 10− 3). The average time to diagnosis has decreased in recent years (now ~ 3.9 years), due to advancements namely the increased use of whole genome and exome sequencing. However, misdiagnoses remain prevalent (PMM2-CDG – 44.9%, non-PMM2-CDG – 64.8%). To address these challenges, we propose adapting medical training to increase awareness of CDG and other rare diseases, ongoing education for physicians, the development of educational resources for relevant medical units, and empowerment of families through patient organizations and support networks. Conclusion This study emphasizes the crucial role of community-centered research, and the insights families can offer to enhance CDG management. By pinpointing existing gaps and needs, our findings can inform targeted interventions and support systems to improve the lives of those impacted by CDG.

Dominik Herzog,1 Werner Vach,2,3 Thomas Schwamborn,2 Franziska Saxer1,3,4 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 2Crossklinik Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 3Basel Academy for Quality and Research in Medicine, Basel, Switzerland; 4Novartis BioMedical Research, Translational Medicine, Basel, SwitzerlandCorrespondence: Franziska Saxer, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, Basel, 4056, Switzerland, Tel +41 61 207 31 11, Email franziska.saxer@unibas.chIntroduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are frequent injuries, especially in athletes. Return to sports after reconstruction of the ligament is a frequently debated topic and of high relevance for these patients. It is mostly achieved at 9– 12 months post-surgery. However, the risk of subsequent knee injuries is high and psychological factors play an important role in the process and success of returning to sports. Little is known about patients’ perception of their journey returning to sports. This study aims to fill the gap.Material and Methods: The study aimed to include patients treated surgically for an ACL injury over 5 years at a specialized sports-medicine clinic. Patients were surveyed on the impact of the injury on their lives, their return to sports experience, and medical history.Results: In total, 100 (of 474) patients aged 35.9 years responded. Within 5 years, 19% experienced a reoperation and 23% a new knee injury. Overall, 83% of patients returned to their main sport, 72% reached their pre-injury level. However, 45% reported at least one distinct or severe consequence of their ACL injury. The ability to return to sports had more impact on the perception of the course of treatment than the experience of new injuries or surgery.Conclusion: The rate of successful return to sports was comparable to previous reports despite a higher average age in this cohort. A successful return to sports seems to be a major determinant for the perception of impact from the injury and may be more important than the avoidance of repeat trauma.Keywords: knee injury, patient journey, psychological impact of injury, quality of life, treatment perception

Background: Wild-type and hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (ATTRwt and ATTRv amyloidosis, respectively) are progressive, fatal diseases with a broad range of clinical presentations and multisystem effects. Despite having a higher prevalence, ATTRwt amyloidosis is less well characterized due to its non-hereditary nature, and its relatively poorer disease awareness delays diagnosis. Understanding of its natural history has evolved in recent years, but this is largely based on physician-collected data rather than patients' reports of their own experiences. A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate how the healthcare journeys of patients with ATTRv and ATTRwt amyloidosis compare. Methods: A quantitative survey was administered to US-patients diagnosed with both ATTRwt amyloidosis and ATTRv amyloidosis identified through a patient support group. Subsequent in-depth interviews with participants with ATTRwt amyloidosis were conducted. Quantitative data with related qualitative quotes from patients were produced to characterize their paths to diagnosis and the disease burden experienced. Results: A total of 47 respondents completed the survey (ATTRv, n = 20 and ATTRwt, n = 27) and a total of 14 survey respondents with ATTRwt amyloidosis were interviewed. Survey results reported a high disease burden for patients with both conditions, with patients with ATTRwt amyloidosis reporting more diagnoses and procedures prior to their final diagnosis. Interviews with participants with ATTRwt amyloidosis revealed that patients face a high symptomatic burden of disease. Diagnosis was often delayed due to three key factors: (1) early signs of ATTRwt amyloidosis were often assumed to be related to old age; (2) many medical specialists working in silos were involved in participants' diagnostic; and (3) there was a general lack of disease awareness. Early indicators such as carpal tunnel syndrome were often overlooked. Participants were typically diagnosed after the disease had progressed to include severe cardiac symptoms such as atrial fibrillation and severe shortness of breath. Sleep apnoea was also reported by a number of participants, with a considerable impact on quality of life. Conclusions: Our study provides insight into the overall impact of the patient journey on their quality of life and demonstrates how increased awareness of ATTRwt amyloidosis and more coordinated engagement with physicians could reduce the time to diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of rare metabolic diseases with heterogeneous presentations, leading to substantial diagnostic challenges, which are poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate this diagnostic journey by examining families' and professionals' experiences. Results and discussion: A questionnaire was designed for CDG families and professionals, garnering 160 and 35 responses, respectively. Analysis revealed the lack of seizures as a distinctive feature between PMM2-CDG (11.2%) with Other CDG (57.7%) at symptom onset. Hypotonia and developmental disability were prevalent symptoms across all studied CDG. Feeding problems were identified as an early onset symptom in PMM2-CDG (Cramer's V (V) = 0.30, False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 3.8 × 10− 9), and hypotonia in all studied CDG (V = 0.34, FDR = 7.0 × 10− 3). The average time to diagnosis has decreased in recent years (now ~ 3.9 years), due to advancements namely the increased use of whole genome and exome sequencing. However, misdiagnoses remain prevalent (PMM2-CDG – 44.9%, non-PMM2-CDG – 64.8%). To address these challenges, we propose adapting medical training to increase awareness of CDG and other rare diseases, ongoing education for physicians, the development of educational resources for relevant medical units, and empowerment of families through patient organizations and support networks. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the crucial role of community-centered research, and the insights families can offer to enhance CDG management. By pinpointing existing gaps and needs, our findings can inform targeted interventions and support systems to improve the lives of those impacted by CDG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) are chronic diseases that significantly impact the lives of affected individuals. We aimed to explore the perspectives of individuals with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), and the challenges they encounter in their daily lives and within the healthcare systems in the Nordics. Interviews with patients (N = 41) and healthcare professionals (n = 14) and a patient survey (n = 70) were conducted in 2022 in Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and Norway to develop a patient journey map that visualises the patient with CDH journey and provides insights into the difficulties faced by these individuals. The patient journey mapping approach was chosen to focus on the processes and experiences of patients, highlighting the challenges they confront. Our findings revealed that the process of receiving a CDH diagnosis, as well as subsequent misdiagnoses and treatment, can be protracted and burdensome. CDH diagnoses remain poorly understood by neurologists, general practitioners, and the public, resulting in adverse consequences, with patients reporting a mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from symptom onset to diagnosis of 8.4 (5.11) years and a mean (SD) of 5.5 (4.17) productive hours lost/day. The available non‐pharmaceutical support for patients with CDH, encompassing medical, psychological, educational, and professional assistance, was insufficient. The generalisability of the findings to one specific diagnosis is limited due to the collective analysis of the CDH. These findings are invaluable for identifying disruptions in the patient with CDH journeys and for designing improved pathways for those with NT1, NT2, and IH in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hemophilia is a rare X-linked bleeding disorder. Prophylaxis has improved outcomes, but there are still unmet needs to be addressed. The aim of this study was to develop a patient journey in pediatric patients with hemophilia, a visual tool that illustrates patients' relationship with the healthcare provider through time useful for identifying patient needs, potential concerns ("pain points"), and gaps in care. Methods: qualitative study in a pediatric hemophilia unit using a human-centered design methodology. First stage: discover and empathize: (a) semi-structured interviews to patients/families and stakeholders; (b) observation techniques ("shadowing") to patients/families and professionals. Second stage: analyzing the collected information to create the patient journey. Results: A preliminary "clinical journey" was built using information from eight interviews with professionals from the interdisciplinary hemophilia team. Interviews with patient association representatives, 13 patients/families, and six "shadowing" techniques with patients and professionals were used to compare the "clinical journey" with the patient's reported experience. Main "pain points" were detected before diagnosis, at diagnosis, during assimilation, at treatment initiation, during training, and when patients start asking about their condition. The empowerment process was detected as a potential moment to improve patient/family experiences. Conclusions: The patient journey helps to better understand patient/family experiences related to the disease in different scenarios. Caregivers and patient learning and empowerment processes are significant moments where the interdisciplinary team should focus to offer valuable solutions to improve outcomes. Further research is required in this area, particularly empirical research to amend or confirm the suggested patient journey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) presenting with a progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) phenotype, current knowledge of disease characteristics at diagnosis, patient journey, and treatment is limited. This study aimed to describe demographics and clinical experiences of patients presenting with PPF in a European real-world setting. Methods: Data were analysed from the Adelphi Real World PPF-ILD Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of pulmonologists and rheumatologists in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom) and internal medicine specialists (France) from April to October 2022. Physicians provided data for up to 12 consecutive patients with physician-confirmed ILD with a progressive phenotype other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Analyses were descriptive. Results: Overall, 265 physicians reported on 1,335 patients. Mean (standard deviation) age at survey date was 60.4 (11.6) years, 91.2% were white, 58.1% female, 44.0% non-smokers. Most patients (63.3%) first consulted a primary care physician. There was a mean delay of 7.8 (22.7) months between first ILD symptom and healthcare professional visit, and another 7.7 (12.8) months to ILD diagnosis. At survey date, 47.7% of patients had physician-reported moderate ILD, 42.3% had mild ILD and 10.0% had severe ILD. Disease progression was reported in the 12 months prior to the survey for 19.5% of patients; of these, progression was based on worsening symptom in 27.3% and lung function decline in 25.8%. For patients experiencing symptoms prior to ILD diagnosis (72.8%), the most common symptoms were dyspnoea on exertion (80.5%) and cough (57.8%). Overall, 17.4% of patients were misdiagnosed prior to ILD diagnosis, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease suspected in 39.2% of them. The most frequent comorbidities were anxiety (16.9%) and gastroesophageal reflux (15.5%). Although 77.8% of patients were receiving treatment for ILD at survey date, 15.6% of patients had never been prescribed treatment for ILD. Conclusions: This real-world study expands our understanding of patients, diagnostic delays and treatment gaps experienced by patients diagnosed with PPF in Europe. There was a mean delay of 15.5 months between first ILD symptoms and ILD diagnosis. Given the progressive nature of PPF, diagnostic delay may lead to poor outcomes, including shorter survival. Trial registration: N/a. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Radiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Pediatric growth hormone deficiency (PGHD) is a chronic condition where the pituitary gland fails to produce sufficient growth hormone, leading to delayed growth and developmental challenges. Patient journey maps can provide insight into pain points and potential opportunities for new or improved interventions to enhance care. However, a patient journey map does not yet exist for PGHD. Secondary data analysis was performed on interviews and focus groups from five cohorts in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, France, and The Netherlands. Participants included 62 patients and caregivers who used a prototype digital health solution, which was used to guide discussions. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data, resulting in a patient journey map comprising six stages: awareness, diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment initiation, treatment maintenance and transition. This provides the first detailed PGHD patient journey map, revealing emotional sensitivities and challenges at each stage, and suggesting areas for targeted interventions to improve adherence and long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Objectives: Patients increasingly use social media to share and access health-related information and experiences. This study employed social media listening to gain patient-centric insights into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and Method: Publicly available social media data was collected between November 4th, 2020, and November 4th, 2022, about MASLD from eight countries: Brazil, China, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The analysis involved capturing patient conversations on their journey stages (causes-risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment), unmet needs, and impact on patient's quality of life (QoL) from various social media platforms to gain insights associated with MASLD. Results: A total of 1600 patient-centric posts were analyzed. The patient journey was the most prevalent topic (92 %) mentioned, followed by comorbidities (38 %) and interactions with HCPs (26 %, health care professionals). Key causes discussed included unhealthy diet (39 %) and overweight/obese (32 %), while the most mentioned symptoms were fatigue (20 %) and pain or abdominal discomfort (20 %). Ultrasound (n=170/553, 31 %) was the most used diagnosis, followed by blood tests (n=130/553, 24 %) and liver function tests (n=91/553, 16 %). Lifestyle management techniques were mainly the standard of care, followed by treatment (n=270/1061, 25 %) and follow-ups with HCPs (n=133/1061, 13 %). Over half (54 %) of the QoL discussion (n=104/192) focused on patients’ comorbidities, and 27 % on disease severity, indicating that having MASLD in moderate to severe form with comorbidities significantly affects patients’ quality of life. An emotional analysis revealed that patients were worried and frustrated about their condition but were also hopeful and determined to improve their health. Nearly 38 % of the posts mentioned that patients were emotionally affected by negative feelings, especially those with multiple comorbidities. Lack of access to knowledgeable HCPs and treatment options were the most frequently discussed unmet needs. Conclusions: This analysis of NAFLD patient experiences introduces a unique approach for deriving insights into patients' experiences and their impact on QoL. These insights have the potential to complement conventional methods and foster patient-centric research.

Abstract This exploratory qualitative study aims to gain a people-centered understanding of the patient journey in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 individuals diagnosed with axSpA, aged 18 years and older, who were purposively recruited from a rheumatologic practice in southern Germany. The interviews were carried out as web-based video calls between September and October 2021, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed according to Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis. Patient journey narratives encompassed both healthcare journeys and personal journeys. Healthcare journeys were characterized as fragmented and difficult to navigate, with diagnosis often marking a turning point toward more coordinated care. Post-diagnosis, new challenges emerged (e.g., time management for treatment). Personal journeys comprised perceptions of axSpA in social contexts (e.g., stigmatization) and the continuous interplay of comorbidities and biographical events with healthcare related to axSpA. This study proposes a people-centered perspective on the patient journey in axSpA, emphasizing the interplay of biographies, comorbidities, and social context with healthcare events. Recognizing these personal factors in clinical practice is encouraged to address complex health needs and tailor treatment to each individual. Further efforts should promote collaboration between medical disciplines and integrate healthcare and social support at all stages of the axSpA patient journey.

Abstract Background Medical text, as part of an electronic health record, is an essential information source in healthcare. Although natural language processing (NLP) techniques for medical text are developing fast, successful transfer into clinical practice has been rare. Especially the hospital domain offers great potential while facing several challenges including many documents per patient, multiple departments and complex interrelated processes. Methods In this work, we survey relevant literature to identify and classify approaches which exploit NLP in the clinical context. Our contribution involves a systematic mapping of related research onto a prototypical patient journey in the hospital, along which medical documents are created, processed and consumed by hospital staff and patients themselves. Specifically, we reviewed which dataset types, dataset languages, model architectures and tasks are researched in current clinical NLP research. Additionally, we extract and analyze major obstacles during development and implementation. We discuss options to address them and argue for a focus on bias mitigation and model explainability. Results While a patient’s hospital journey produces a significant amount of structured and unstructured documents, certain steps and documents receive more research attention than others. Diagnosis, Admission and Discharge are clinical patient steps that are researched often across the surveyed paper. In contrast, our findings reveal significant under-researched areas such as Treatment, Billing, After Care, and Smart Home. Leveraging NLP in these stages can greatly enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Additionally, clinical NLP models are mostly based on radiology reports, discharge letters and admission notes, even though we have shown that many other documents are produced throughout the patient journey. There is a significant opportunity in analyzing a wider range of medical documents produced throughout the patient journey to improve the applicability and impact of NLP in healthcare. Conclusions Our findings suggest that there is a significant opportunity to leverage NLP approaches to advance clinical decision-making systems, as there remains a considerable understudied potential for the analysis of patient journey data.

Abstract Background Lipodystrophy syndromes are a heterogeneous group of rare, life-limiting diseases characterized by a selective loss of adipose tissue and severe metabolic complications. There is a paucity of information describing the experiences and challenges faced by physicians who have seen and treated patients with lipodystrophy. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of the physician’s perspective regarding the patient journey in lipodystrophy, including diagnosis, the burden of disease, and treatment approaches. Methods Thirty-three physicians from six countries who had seen or treated patients with lipodystrophy were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed for themes and trends. Four main themes were developed: (1) the diagnostic journey in lipodystrophy including the disease features or ‘triggers’ that result in the onward referral of patients to specialist medical centers with experience in managing lipodystrophy; (2) the impact of lipodystrophy on patient quality of life (QoL); (3) the use of standard therapies and leptin replacement therapy (metreleptin) in lipodystrophy, and (4) barriers to metreleptin use. Results Participants reported that, due to their rarity and phenotypic heterogeneity, lipodystrophy cases are frequently unrecognized, leading to delays in diagnosis and medical intervention. Early consultation with multidisciplinary specialist medical teams was recommended for suspected lipodystrophy cases. The development and progression of metabolic complications were identified as key triggers for the referral of patients to specialist centers for follow-up care. Participants emphasized the impact of lipodystrophy on patient QoL, including effects on mental health and self-image. Although participants routinely used standard medical therapies to treat specific metabolic complications associated with lipodystrophy, it was acknowledged that metreleptin was typically required in patients with congenital generalized lipodystrophy and in some acquired generalized and partial lipodystrophy cases. A lack of experience among some participants and restrictions to access remained as barriers to metreleptin use. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies describing the qualitative experiences of physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy. Other physician-centered studies may help increase the awareness of lipodystrophy among the wider medical community and support clinical approaches to this rare disease.

Background: Medical text, as part of an electronic health record, is an essential information source in healthcare. Although natural language processing (NLP) techniques for medical text are developing fast, successful transfer into clinical practice has been rare. Especially the hospital domain offers great potential while facing several challenges including many documents per patient, multiple departments and complex interrelated processes. Methods: In this work, we survey relevant literature to identify and classify approaches which exploit NLP in the clinical context. Our contribution involves a systematic mapping of related research onto a prototypical patient journey in the hospital, along which medical documents are created, processed and consumed by hospital staff and patients themselves. Specifically, we reviewed which dataset types, dataset languages, model architectures and tasks are researched in current clinical NLP research. Additionally, we extract and analyze major obstacles during development and implementation. We discuss options to address them and argue for a focus on bias mitigation and model explainability. Results: While a patient's hospital journey produces a significant amount of structured and unstructured documents, certain steps and documents receive more research attention than others. Diagnosis, Admission and Discharge are clinical patient steps that are researched often across the surveyed paper. In contrast, our findings reveal significant under-researched areas such as Treatment, Billing, After Care, and Smart Home. Leveraging NLP in these stages can greatly enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Additionally, clinical NLP models are mostly based on radiology reports, discharge letters and admission notes, even though we have shown that many other documents are produced throughout the patient journey. There is a significant opportunity in analyzing a wider range of medical documents produced throughout the patient journey to improve the applicability and impact of NLP in healthcare. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is a significant opportunity to leverage NLP approaches to advance clinical decision-making systems, as there remains a considerable understudied potential for the analysis of patient journey data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lipodystrophy syndromes are a heterogeneous group of rare, life-limiting diseases characterized by a selective loss of adipose tissue and severe metabolic complications. There is a paucity of information describing the experiences and challenges faced by physicians who have seen and treated patients with lipodystrophy. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of the physician's perspective regarding the patient journey in lipodystrophy, including diagnosis, the burden of disease, and treatment approaches. Methods: Thirty-three physicians from six countries who had seen or treated patients with lipodystrophy were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed for themes and trends. Four main themes were developed: (1) the diagnostic journey in lipodystrophy including the disease features or 'triggers' that result in the onward referral of patients to specialist medical centers with experience in managing lipodystrophy; (2) the impact of lipodystrophy on patient quality of life (QoL); (3) the use of standard therapies and leptin replacement therapy (metreleptin) in lipodystrophy, and (4) barriers to metreleptin use. Results: Participants reported that, due to their rarity and phenotypic heterogeneity, lipodystrophy cases are frequently unrecognized, leading to delays in diagnosis and medical intervention. Early consultation with multidisciplinary specialist medical teams was recommended for suspected lipodystrophy cases. The development and progression of metabolic complications were identified as key triggers for the referral of patients to specialist centers for follow-up care. Participants emphasized the impact of lipodystrophy on patient QoL, including effects on mental health and self-image. Although participants routinely used standard medical therapies to treat specific metabolic complications associated with lipodystrophy, it was acknowledged that metreleptin was typically required in patients with congenital generalized lipodystrophy and in some acquired generalized and partial lipodystrophy cases. A lack of experience among some participants and restrictions to access remained as barriers to metreleptin use. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies describing the qualitative experiences of physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy. Other physician-centered studies may help increase the awareness of lipodystrophy among the wider medical community and support clinical approaches to this rare disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Onco.news is the property of Portuguese Association of Oncology Nursing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

INTRODUCTION: Vascular anomalies (VAs) are rare conditions and affected patients often experience a difficult patient journey. Timely diagnosis is only possible if primary caregivers are aware of the anomalies and are connected with dedicated specialists. Aim of our survey was to investigate the knowledge about diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities for children with VAs, and the existing networking among primary pediatric caregivers in Austria. METHODS: Primary care pediatricians in Austria were invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of 28 questions focusing on pediatric VAs. RESULTS: Out of 373 invited pediatricians 93 (25%) returned the questionnaires, 86 of which were complete. Most physicians (39/93 42%) answered that they see between 15 and 30 patients with infantile hemangiomas per year. Vascular malformations are rarely treated in the primary care setting; most primary care pediatricians (58/86, 67%) reported that they currently treat fewer than 5 patients with such type of VAs. There was unequivocal agreement among the participants (84/86, 98%) on the need to establish a network of specialists and a registry dedicated to pediatric VAs. CONCLUSIONS: This survey represents the first study shedding light on the awareness of VAs among Austrian pediatricians and can serve as a basis for future investigations and advances in the management of these conditions in Austria and other countries with a similar healthcare setting.

Abstract Background Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is a genetic rare disease characterized by recurrent, transient and unpredictable episodes of cold, non-pruriginous oedema without associated urticaria. The characteristics of the disease have a considerable impact on the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the patient journey of HAE in Spain. Methods A multidisciplinary committee of 16 HAE experts (allergy, immunology, emergency department, hospital pharmacy and nursing) and 3 representatives of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AEDAF) who were patients or caregivers participated in the study. A review of the publications on HAE treatment was performed. Semi-structured interviews were performed to HAE experts, patients, or caregivers. Three meetings with the experts, patients and caregivers were held to share, discuss, and validate data obtained from literature and interviews and to build the model. Results Throughout the project, the patient journey has been drawn up, dividing it into the stages of pre-diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment/follow-up. Some areas for improvement have been identified. Firstly, there is a need to enhance awareness and training on HAE among healthcare professionals, with a particular emphasis on primary care and emergency department personnel. Secondly, efforts should be made to minimize patient referral times to allergy/immunology specialists, ensuring timely access to appropriate care. Thirdly, it is crucial to encourage the study of the relatives of diagnosed patients to early identify potential cases. Fourthly, equitable access to self-administered treatments should be ensured, facilitated by systems that enable medication delivery at home and proper education and training for patients. Equitable access to long-term prophylactic treatment should also be prioritized for all patients in need. To standardize HAE management, the development of consensus guidelines that reduce variability in clinical practice is essential. Lastly, promoting research studies to enhance knowledge of the disease and align its treatment with new developments in the healthcare field should be encouraged. Conclusions The knowledge of the patient journey in HAE allowed us to identify improvement areas with the final aim to optimize the disease management.

Abstract Background For most acute conditions, the phase prior to emergency department (ED) arrival is largely unexplored. However, this prehospital phase has proven an important part of the acute care chain (ACC) for specific time-sensitive conditions, such as stroke and myocardial infarction. For patients with undifferentiated complaints, exploration of the prehospital phase of the ACC may also offer a window of opportunity for improvement of care. This study aims to explore the ACC of ED patients with undifferentiated complaints, with specific emphasis on time in ACC and patient experience. Methods This Dutch prospective observational study, included all adult (≥ 18 years) ED patients with undifferentiated complaints over a 4-week period. We investigated the patients’ journey through the ACC, focusing on time in ACC and patient experience. Additionally, a multivariable linear regression analysis was employed to identify factors independently associated with time in ACC. Results Among the 286 ED patients with undifferentiated complaints, the median symptom duration prior to ED visit was 6 days (IQR 2–10), during which 58.6% of patients had contact with a healthcare provider before referral. General Practitioners (GPs) referred 80.4% of the patients, with the predominant patient journey (51.7%) involving GP referral followed by self-transportation to the ED. The median time in ACC was 5.5 (IQR 4.0-8.4) hours of which 40% was spent before the ED visit. GP referral and referral to pulmonology were associated with a longer time in ACC, while referral during evenings was associated with a shorter time in ACC. Patients scored both quality and duration of the provided care an 8/10. Conclusion Dutch ED patients with undifferentiated complaints consulted a healthcare provider in over half of the cases before their ED visit. The median time in ACC is 5.5 h of which 40% is spent in the prehospital phase. Those referred by a GP and to pulmonology had a longer, and those in the evening a shorter time in ACC. The acute care journey starts hours before patients arrive at the ED and 6 days of complaints precede this journey. This timeframe could serve as a window of opportunity to optimise care.

Background Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is a genetic rare disease characterized by recurrent, transient and unpredictable episodes of cold, non-pruriginous oedema without associated urticaria. The characteristics of the disease have a considerable impact on the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the patient journey of HAE in Spain. Methods A multidisciplinary committee of 16 HAE experts (allergy, immunology, emergency department, hospital pharmacy and nursing) and 3 representatives of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AEDAF) who were patients or caregivers participated in the study. A review of the publications on HAE treatment was performed. Semi-structured interviews were performed to HAE experts, patients, or caregivers. Three meetings with the experts, patients and caregivers were held to share, discuss, and validate data obtained from literature and interviews and to build the model. Results Throughout the project, the patient journey has been drawn up, dividing it into the stages of pre-diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment/follow-up. Some areas for improvement have been identified. Firstly, there is a need to enhance awareness and training on HAE among healthcare professionals, with a particular emphasis on primary care and emergency department personnel. Secondly, efforts should be made to minimize patient referral times to allergy/immunology specialists, ensuring timely access to appropriate care. Thirdly, it is crucial to encourage the study of the relatives of diagnosed patients to early identify potential cases. Fourthly, equitable access to self-administered treatments should be ensured, facilitated by systems that enable medication delivery at home and proper education and training for patients. Equitable access to long-term prophylactic treatment should also be prioritized for all patients in need. To standardize HAE management, the development of consensus guidelines that reduce variability in clinical practice is essential. Lastly, promoting research studies to enhance knowledge of the disease and align its treatment with new developments in the healthcare field should be encouraged. Conclusions The knowledge of the patient journey in HAE allowed us to identify improvement areas with the final aim to optimize the disease management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer has the highest incidence and cancer-related mortality worldwide. In Portugal, it ranks as the fourth most common cancer, with nearly 6000 new cases being diagnosed every year. Lung cancer is the main cause of cancer-related death among males and the third cause of cancer-related death in females. Despite the globally accepted guidelines and recommendations for what would be the ideal path for a lung cancer patient, several challenges occur in real clinical management across the world. The recommendations emphasize the importance of adequate screening of high-risk individuals, a precise tumour biopsy, and an accurate final diagnosis to confirm the neoplastic nature of the nodule. A detailed histological classification of the lung tumour type and a comprehensive molecular characterization are of utmost importance for the selection of an efficacious and patient-directed therapeutic approach. However, in the context of the Portuguese clinical organization and the national healthcare system, there are still several gaps in the ideal pathway for a lung cancer patient, involving aspects ranging from the absence of a national lung cancer screening programme through difficulties in histological diagnosis and molecular characterization to challenges in therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we address the most relevant weaknesses, presenting several proposals for potential solutions to improve the management of lung cancer patients, helping to decisively improve their overall survival and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unlike the consumer industry, biopharma, medical technology, and wellness companies have struggled to build meaningful, personalized patient and healthcare professional (HCP) experiences. The increase in drug launches and growing competition across therapy areas has made it challenging for brands and organizations to stand out from the crowd, whether for new molecules vs. legacy brands in an established treatment area and their generic counter-parts or for new molecules in a rare disease where trust is not yet earned. The customers’ needs and preferences are changing at lightning speed. The hierarchy of engagement has transformed, disrupting the dynamic between patients and healthcare professionals. Studies (1, 2) show that drug marketers too often turn various aspects of their product profile into signals – and may inadvertently “reinforce the habitual behavior the marketer is trying to change”. We encourage pharmaceutical companies to use a “data-driven approach to uncover new opportunities for growth” and improvement, and we’re committed to delivering results that make a difference for the patient, HCPs and for the system (value-based healthcare approach). Applying the Brand Leadership Circle, a new strategic tool, will help understand the patients’ journey and other stakeholders’ needs to implement successful approaches in marketing, communications and services using systematic research methods and techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For most acute conditions, the phase prior to emergency department (ED) arrival is largely unexplored. However, this prehospital phase has proven an important part of the acute care chain (ACC) for specific time-sensitive conditions, such as stroke and myocardial infarction. For patients with undifferentiated complaints, exploration of the prehospital phase of the ACC may also offer a window of opportunity for improvement of care. This study aims to explore the ACC of ED patients with undifferentiated complaints, with specific emphasis on time in ACC and patient experience. Methods: This Dutch prospective observational study, included all adult (≥ 18 years) ED patients with undifferentiated complaints over a 4-week period. We investigated the patients' journey through the ACC, focusing on time in ACC and patient experience. Additionally, a multivariable linear regression analysis was employed to identify factors independently associated with time in ACC. Results: Among the 286 ED patients with undifferentiated complaints, the median symptom duration prior to ED visit was 6 days (IQR 2–10), during which 58.6% of patients had contact with a healthcare provider before referral. General Practitioners (GPs) referred 80.4% of the patients, with the predominant patient journey (51.7%) involving GP referral followed by self-transportation to the ED. The median time in ACC was 5.5 (IQR 4.0-8.4) hours of which 40% was spent before the ED visit. GP referral and referral to pulmonology were associated with a longer time in ACC, while referral during evenings was associated with a shorter time in ACC. Patients scored both quality and duration of the provided care an 8/10. Conclusion: Dutch ED patients with undifferentiated complaints consulted a healthcare provider in over half of the cases before their ED visit. The median time in ACC is 5.5 h of which 40% is spent in the prehospital phase. Those referred by a GP and to pulmonology had a longer, and those in the evening a shorter time in ACC. The acute care journey starts hours before patients arrive at the ED and 6 days of complaints precede this journey. This timeframe could serve as a window of opportunity to optimise care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Patient Journey Project aimed to analyze the scenario among Italian Mental Health Services (MHS) to understand the clinical interventions that are properly implemented and the ones deserving further implementation to design an effective treatment plan for patients living with schizophrenia (PLWS). Methods: The 60-items survey was co-designed with all the stakeholders (clinicians, expert patients and caregivers) involved in the Patient Journey and focused on three phases of schizophrenia course: early detection and management, acute phase management, long-term management/continuity of care. Respondents were Heads of the Mental Health Departments and Addiction Services (MHDAS) or facilities directors throughout Italian MHS. For each statement, respondents expressed the consensus on the importance and the degree of implementation in clinical practice. Results: Considering the importance of the statement, strong consensus was reached for most of the statements. Good levels of implementation were found on 2/17 statements of early detection and management, on 3/16 statements for acute phase management and on 1/27 statements of long-term management/continuity of care. Poor levels of implementation were found on 1/17 statements of early detection and management, none of acute phase management, and 4/27 statements for long-term management/continuity of care. Moderate levels of implementation were found on 14/17 statements for early detection and management, on 13/16 statements of acute phase management, and on 22/27 statements of long-term management/continuity of care. Thus, among Italian MHDAS, most interventions for PLWS were moderately implemented in clinical practice. Discussion: Italian MHS have to provide new strategies and structural actions to overcome these current limitations and barriers to effectively improve the journey of PLWS. The areas that deserve most implementation include interventions during the early stage (especially the continuity of care between Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and Adult Mental Health Services), the evidence-based psychosocial interventions during the chronic stages of the disorder, and the continuity of care after acute hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This work deals with the question of which digital touchpoints in the course of a patient journey are desired by neurological patients, important for effective treatment and easy to implement. Methodology: 100 (44 men, 56 women) patients in a neurological practice at three different locations were examined using a written questionnaire with closed questions on topics of online booking, making appointments and reminders via SMS, video consultation with the doctor and chat with the doctor or the medical practice assistant. Results: It was shown that the older a person is, the less they prefer digital booking and consultation and that the more they work, the more they prefer digital booking and consultation and the longer they live in Switzerland, the less they prefer chat advice. Data protection plays a more important role in older patients. Regarding gender no significant differences can be shown. Discussion: The results are in line with a survey conducted by the Swiss Medical Association (Foederatio Medicorum Helveticorum) of 2020, which shows that the population wants to relieve the burden on doctors in administrative tasks through the use of digital solutions considered desirable. In this study, both younger and older patients are very interested in booking appointments online and to receive an appointment reminder via text message. Since older patients tend to prefer conservative booking, a «hybrid model» should be offered so that both options are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]