Search

Background and Aims: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a serious complication of prosthetic valve replacement. Both surgical and percutaneous closure techniques are used for PVL closure, but optimal strategies and comparative outcomes are uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous versus surgical PVL closure by analyzing changes in leak severity, functional status, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A total of 72 patients were included in this retrospective cross‐sectional single‐center study comparing percutaneous (n = 25) and surgical (n = 47) PVL closure from 2015 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, echocardiograms, laboratory data, complications, and mortality data were extracted from the records. Changes in leak severity, NYHA class, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the percutaneous and surgical groups. Results: Both percutaneous and surgical PVL closure significantly reduced leak severity and improved NYHA class (both p < 0.01), with no difference between the quantity of changes in each group. The 30‐day mortality was 4% after percutaneous and 6.4% after surgical closure (p = 0.65). At 90 days, mortality was 24% percutaneous versus 17% surgical (p = 0.48). The length of stay in the hospital and post‐procedural decrease in hemoglobin were considerably lower in the percutaneous group. The rate of complication rates was similar between the groups. Echocardiographic changes were also comparable. Conclusion: Percutaneous and surgical PVL closure had similar efficacy in reducing leaks and improving symptoms, with no significant difference in early outcomes. Both options should be considered viable for PVL repair after heart team evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis is technically challenging and is burdened by an increased risk of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR). The aim of this study was to identify the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of PVR after TAVR in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis. Consecutive patients with Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis undergoing TAVR with current-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in 24 international centers were enrolled. PVR was graded as none/trace, mild, moderate, and severe according to echocardiographic criteria. The endpoint of major adverse events (MAEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure, was assessed at the last available follow-up. A total of 946 patients were enrolled. PVR occurred in 423 patients (44.7%)—mild, moderate, and severe in 387 (40.9%), 32 (3.4%), and 4 (0.4%) patients, respectively. Independent predictors of moderate or severe PVR were a larger virtual raphe ring perimeter (adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), severe annular or left ventricular outflow tract calcification (adjusted OR: 5.21; 95% CI: 1.45-18.77), a self-expanding valve (adjusted OR: 9.01; 95% CI: 2.09-38.86), and intentional supra-annular THV positioning (adjusted OR: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.04-10.54). At a median follow-up of 1.3 years (Q1-Q3: 0.5-2.4 years), moderate or severe PVR was associated with an increased risk of MAEs (adjusted HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.24-5.09). After TAVR with current-generation THVs in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis, moderate or severe PVR occurred in about 4% of cases and was associated with an increased risk of MAEs during follow-up. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous closure of aortic and ventricular pseudoaneurysms (PSA) has only been reported on a case report and series basis. In previous case reports, percutaneous closure has been performed successfully in patients of prohibitive surgical risk. This case series aims to show feasibility of percutaneous closure of aortic and ventricular pseudoaneurysm secondary to perivalvular leak (PVL) in a small patient population and the utility of multimodality imaging as an integral tool in procedural planning. This is the largest complex case series to date describing the feasibility and success rate of complex PSA closure, with a follow-up period of up to 4 years. We performed institutional review and systemic literature review to identify all paravalvular leak cases with associated pseudoaneurysm formation for which a closure procedure was performed. Ten patients were identified. Pooled analysis for cases from institutional review (n = 10) and systemic literature review (n = 39) was performed. The success rate was 100 %. At 30-days, the mortality was 0 %. In paravalvular leak patients with subsequent pseudoaneurysm formation, exhaustive imaging evaluation is required for closure. However, it can be achievable with favorable rates of success. • Aortic and LVOT pseudoaneurysms can occur due to weakness in the wall near the PVL jet. • Surgical mortality can be as high as 35 % • Meticulous CT planning helps size and select an optimal device for closure. • Our case series uses coil embolization and occlusion techniques with a high success and no complications at 4 years. • Percutaneous closure is safe and feasible. Larger studies are needed for validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is an uncommon complication of prosthetic valve implantation, which can lead to infective endocarditis, heart failure, and hemolytic anemia. Surgical reintervention of PVLs is associated with high mortality rates. Transcatheter PVL closure (TPVLc) has emerged as an alternative to surgical reoperation. This method provides a high success rate with a low rate of complications. This article reviews the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, and management of PVL and complications following TPVLc. Besides, we presented a case of a patient with severe PVL following mitral valve replacement, who experienced complete heart block (CHB) during TPVLc. The first TPVLc procedure failed in our patient due to possible AV‐node insult during catheterization. After 1 week of persistent CHB, a permanent pacemaker was implanted. The defect was successfully passed using the previous attempt. Considering the advantages of TPVLc, procedure failure should be regarded as a concern. TPVLc should be performed by experienced medical teams in carefully selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and Aims Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a serious complication of prosthetic valve replacement. Both surgical and percutaneous closure techniques are used for PVL closure, but optimal strategies and comparative outcomes are uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous versus surgical PVL closure by analyzing changes in leak severity, functional status, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes. Methods A total of 72 patients were included in this retrospective cross‐sectional single‐center study comparing percutaneous (n = 25) and surgical (n = 47) PVL closure from 2015 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, echocardiograms, laboratory data, complications, and mortality data were extracted from the records. Changes in leak severity, NYHA class, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the percutaneous and surgical groups. Results Both percutaneous and surgical PVL closure significantly reduced leak severity and improved NYHA class (both p

TAVI (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) in elderly and comorbid patients. Following the guidelines of eminent cardiac societies, a decision on the treatment modality is made by the so-called “heart team”. Despite being less invasive, the procedure is related to some complications, among which the most common ones are stroke, life-threatening bleeding, vascular injury, kidney injury, conduction disturbances demanding permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and perivalvular leak (PVL). Here we present a case report of multiple periprocedural complications in the same patient, related to TAVI, such as right coronary artery (RCA) dissection on preoperative coronary angiography (CA), postprocedural acute neurologic injury and high grade atrioventricular (AV) block followed by PPM implantation.

Aims: We report 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year outcomes for a new TAVR programme that used five different transcatheter heart valve (THV) systems. Methods: From 2014 to 2020, 122 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) received TAVR based on the Heart Team decision. Outcomes were analysed for the whole study population and in addition the first 63 patients (Cohort A, 2014 to 2019) were compared to the last 59 patients (Cohort B, 2019 to 2020). Outcomes included VARC-2 definitions and device performance assessed via transthoracic echocardiography by independent high-volume investigators. Results: The mean patient age was 77.9 ± 6.1 years old, and 48 (39.3%) were male. The mean logistic Euroscore II was 4.2 ± 4.5, and the mean STS score was 6.9 ± 4.68. The systems used were as follows: Medtronic Corevalve Evolute R/PRO (82 patients—67.2%); Abbott Portico (13—10.6%); Boston Scientific Lotus (10—8.2%); Meril Myval (11—9%); and Boston Scientific Neo Accurate (6—5%). Access was transfemoral (95.9% of patients); surgical cut down (18% vs. percutaneous 77.8%); subclavian (n = 2); trans-axillary (n = 2); and direct aorta (n = 1). VARC-2 outcomes were as follows: device success rate 97.5%; stroke rate 1.6%; major vascular complication 3.3%; permanent pacemaker implantation 12.4%. At discharge, the incidences of grade I and II aortic regurgitation were 39.95 and 55.5%, respectively. At one year, all-cause mortality was 7.4% without admissions for valve-related dysfunction. The 3-year all-cause mortality and all-stroke rates were 22.9% and 4.1%, respectively. Between the 1-year and 3-year follow-ups, valve-related dysfunction was detected in three patients; one had THV system endocarditis that led to death. There was a remarkable but statistically non-significant decrease in mortality from Cohort A to Cohort B [four (6.3%) vs. one patient (1.7%), p = 0.195] and major vascular complications occurred at a significantly higher rate in the Cohort B [zero (0%) vs. four (6.8% patient, p = 0.036)]. Overall, we found that using multiple devices was safe and allowed for a learning team to achieve a high device success rate from the beginning (97.5%). Conclusions: TAVR with different THV systems showed acceptable early and mid-term outcomes for survival, technical success, and valve-related adverse events in high-risk patients with significant AS, even in the learning curve phase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the in-hospital, 1-month and 1-year post-procedure outcomes of patients treated with Evolut-R 34 mm and Evolut-R 23/26/29 mm devices. Additionally, the study aimed to identify factors that could predict the occurrence of = mild paravalvular leaks (PVL). Methods: Between April 2015 and May 2022, 269 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with Evolut-R 34 mm (n = 66, 24.5%) and Evolut-R 23/26/29 mm (n = 203, 75.5%) devices in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Patients in the Evolut-R 34 mm group had a lower female sex ratio (16.7% vs. 66.5%, P < .001, respectively), ejection fraction (50.7 ± 10.1% vs. 54.5 ± 9.3%, P = .016, respectively), and mean aortic gradient (7.4 ± 3.3 vs. 9.2 ± 5.0, P = .026, respectively) compared to the Evolut-R 23/26/29 mm group. The groups did not exhibit any statistically significant distinctions with regard to technical success, the need for a permanent pacemaker, occurrences of stroke, major vascular complications, PVL, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, or mortality. Peak velocity was confirmed as a significant predictor of =mild PVL in both patient groups in the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In logistic regression analysis; In patients with Evolut-R 34 mm valve, pre-TAVI aortic valve peak velocity (odds ratio (OR) = 23.202; P = .019) and calcium volume 800 Hounsfield Units (mm3) (OR = 1.017; P < .001) were independent predictors of =mild PVL. Conclusion: The Evolut-R 34 mm valve has shown comparable in-hospital results with smaller valve sizes. Pre-TAVI aortic valve peak velocity and calcium volume predicted = mild PVL in Evolut-R 34 mm patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To report our single-center data regarding the initial 52 consecutive patients with a bicuspid aortic valve who underwent a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure using the new balloon-expandable MYVAL system. The focus is on reporting procedural details and outcomes over the 30-day postoperative period. Methods: From December 2019 to July 2023, 52 consecutive patients underwent a TAVI procedure with bicuspid anatomy. All patients had moderate to-high surgical risk or were unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement based on the Heart Team's decision. Outcomes were analyzed according to the VARC-2 criteria. The results of bicuspid patients were compared to patients with tricuspid anatomy in the overall study group, and further analysis involved a comparison between 52 pairs after propensity score matching. The device performance was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. Data collection was allowed by the Local Ethical Committee. Results: The mean age was 71 ± 7.1 years, and 65.4% were male. The mean Euroscore II and STS score were 3.3 ± 3.2 and 5.2 ± 3.3, respectively. Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic parameters were well balanced even in the unmatched comparison. Procedures were significantly longer in the bicuspid group and resulted in a significantly higher ARI index. All relevant anatomic dimensions based on the CT scans were significantly higher in bicuspid anatomy, including a higher implantation angulation, a higher rate of horizontal aorta and a higher proportion of patients with aortopathy. In the unmatched bicuspid vs. tricuspid comparison, postprocedural outcomes were as follows: in-hospital mortality 0% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.394), device success 100% vs. 99.1% (p = 0.487), TIA 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.041), stroke 1.9% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.537), major vascular complication 3.8% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.530), permanent pacemaker implantation 34% vs. 30.4% (p = 0.429), and cardiac tamponade 0% vs. 0.5% (p = 0.624). In the propensity-matched bicuspid vs. tricuspid comparison, postprocedural outcomes were as follows: in-hospital mortality 0% vs. 0%, device success 100% vs. 100%, TIA 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.315), stroke 1.9% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.315), major vascular complication 3.8% vs. 0% (p = 0.475), permanent pacemaker implantation 34% vs. 24% (p = 0.274), and cardiac tamponade 0% vs. 0%. There was no annular rupture nor need for second valve or severe aortic regurgitation in both the unmatched and matched comparison. The peak and mean aortic gradients did not differ at discharge and at 30-day follow-up between the two groups regardless of whether the comparison was unmatched or matched. There were no paravalvular leakages (moderate or above) in the bicuspid patients. Intermediate and extra sizes of the Myval THV system used a significantly higher proportion in bicuspid anatomy with a significantly higher oversize percentage in tricuspid anatomy. Conclusions: The TAVI procedure using the Myval THV system in patients with significant aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve anatomy is safe and effective. Hemodynamic parameters do not differ between tricuspid and bicuspid patients. However, the permanent pacemaker implantation rate is higher than expected; its relevance on long-term survival is controversial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective, open-label, single-arm study evaluated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis with ACURATE Prime XL, an iteration of the ACURATE neo2 device designed with improved radial force and adaptations for compatibility with a larger annulus diameter (≥ 26.5 mm and ≤ 29 mm based on pre-procedure diagnostic imaging). The composite primary device success endpoint was based on Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and all stroke at 30 days. Aortic valve (AV) performance, including mean AV gradient, AV area, and grade of paravalvular leak (PVL), was assessed by an independent core laboratory. 13 male patients were enrolled at 3 Australian centers (mean age: 83.1 years; 10 of 13 were considered high/extreme operative risk). 61.5 % of patients met the primary device success endpoint. At 30 days, no patients experienced death or stroke; one patient received a permanent pacemaker. Mean AV gradient improved from baseline (42.7 ± 11.0 mmHg) to discharge (7.7 ± 2.5 mmHg) and through 30 days (7.2 ± 2.3 mmHg). Mean AV area was 0.8 ± 0.1 cm2 at baseline, 1.9 ± 0.3 cm2 at discharge, and 1.7 ± 0.3 cm2 at 30 days. Per core-laboratory adjudication, no patient had moderate or severe PVL at 30 days; 91.7 % had no/trace PVL and 8.3 % had mild PVL. In this first-in-human feasibility study of the ACURATE Prime XL valve, there were no safety concerns, and no deaths or strokes within 30 days. Valve hemodynamics were favorable, and no patient had >mild PVL. • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being extended to a wider patient population. • Larger TAVR devices are needed to treat patients with larger annuli. • ACURATE Prime XL is designed with improved radial force and is compatible with an annulus diameter ≥26.5mm and ≤29mm. • The first-in-human feasibility study of ACURATE Prime XL had no safety concerns, with no deaths or strokes within 30 days. • At 30 days, ACURATE Prime XL valve hemodynamics were favorable, and no patient had >mild paravalvular leak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe paravalvular leak (PVL) may be complicated by heart failure and haemolysis. PVL management is challenging, especially when the gap is large. We describe a case of PVL due to tilting of a sutureless biological prosthesis successfully treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAV-in-SAV).

IntroductionParavalvular leak (PVL) is a severe complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that can lead to poor outcomes. TAVR-in-TAVR is a promising treatment for PVL; however, reports on its safety or efficacy are limited. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable prostheses for PVLs after TAVR.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable Sapien prostheses for PVL after an initial TAVR at our institution. The procedural success, in-hospital complications, all-cause mortality, and echocardiographic data for up to 2 years post-surgery were evaluated.ResultsIn total, 31 patients with a mean age of 81.1 ± 7.9 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.8 ± 5.4% were identified. The procedural success rate of TAVR-in-TAVR was 96.8% (30/31). No in-hospital deaths, cardiac tamponade, or conversion to sternotomy occurred. Re-intervention was performed in only one patient (3.2%) during hospitalization. The all-cause mortality rates at 30 days and 2 years were 0% and 16.1%, respectively. A significant reduction in the PVL rate was observed at 30 days compared with that at baseline (p

Background: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) using the intermittent simple suture technique versus the horizontal matrix suture technique with pledgeted in terms of paravalvular leakage and infective endocarditis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 422 patients who underwent MVR between 2019 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the suture technique used: group B (simple suture technique) and group P (horizontal matrix suture technique with pledgeted). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the groups, resulting in 62 case pairs for comparative analysis. Results: There were no intraoperative mortalities, and the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time did not significantly differ between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of total hospitalization time, early mortality, cerebrovascular events, and arrhythmias. Postoperative echocardiography revealed minimal paravalvular leakage in both groups, with non-serious leakage observed in 4 patients in group B and 2 patients in group P. The incidence of infective endocarditis was 1 in group B and 2 in group P. Hemolysis indicators showed higher mean values in the simple suture technique group, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that there is no significant difference in the incidence of paravalvular leak and infective endocarditis between the intermittent simple suture technique and the horizontal matrix suture technique with pledgeted. Both techniques can be safely employed in MVR.

Background: Paravalvular leaks can be detected in almost 15% of patients after mitral valve prosthesis implantation. This complication can result in congestive heart failure and hemolysis. Despite advancements in non-invasive imaging, percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks is not always successful. Therefore, efforts are made to improve treatment outcomes by using 3D-printed models of defects as preprocedural support for interventional cardiologists. Methods: Retrospectively, 3D-transesophageal echocardiography recordings of 8 patients with clinically significant mitral paravalvular leaks were analyzed. Qlab Software was used to export DICOM images of each paravalvular leak channel, including surrounding tissue. Image segmentation was performed in 3D Slicer, a free, open-source software package used for imaging research. Models were printed to actual size with the poly jet Stratasys Objet 30 printer with a transparent, rigid material. Results: Duration of model preparation and printing, as well as the total cost, was calculated. Mean total time of model preparation was 430.5 +- 196 minutes. Conclusion: 3D-printing from 3D-transesophageal echocardiography is technically feasible. Both shape and location of paravalvular leaks are preserved during model preparation and printing. It remains to be tested if 3D-printing would improve outcomes of percutaneous paravalvular leaks closure.

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: Moderate or severe paravalvular leak (PVL) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been associated with worse outcomes. Aortic valve (AV) calcification is a strong predictor of PVL. ACURATE neo (Boston Scientific Corporation, United States) is a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve to treat degenerative aortic stenosis. We evaluated PVL after ACURATE neo and neo2 implantation, and the role of AV calcification. Methods: We analyzed patients referred for TAVI with ACURATE neo and neo2 from a large volume tertiary center. All cardiac computed tomography scans were analyzed using 3Mensio Structural Heart software (Pie Medical Imaging, The Netherlands). The volume of AV calcium was quantified using contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography series. The 30-day clinical and echocardiographic data were prospectively recorded. Results: We included 165 patients referred for TAVI with ACURATE (neo = 87; neo2 = 78). Median age was 82 years-old, 65% were women with a median EuroSCORE II of 4.7 [IQR, 2.4-6.1]. Patients in the neo group showed a larger amount of total AV calcium (320 mm3 vs 200 mm3; P = .0305). We found no significant inter-group differences regarding clinical outcomes both in-hospital or at 30-days. At 30-days, the rate of PVL ≥ mild (61% vs 34%; P < .001) and ≥ moderate (15.9% vs 5.4%; P = .0365) were higher in the neo group. After propensity score matching adjusted by the total amount of AV calcium, neo2 was associated with a lower risk of PVL ≥ mild (OR, 0.35, 95%CI, 0.18-0.69; P = .003), and ≥ moderate (OR, 0.16; 95%CI, 0.03-0.74; P = .019). Conclusions: TAVI with ACURATE neo2 vs neo is associated with a lower risk of any degree of PVL and a reduced risk of PVL ≥ moderate. After adjusting for AV calcium volume, ACURATE neo2 was still associated with a lower risk of PVL.

Background The optimal treatment of symptomatic paravalvular leak (PVL) remains controversial between transcatheter closure (TC) and surgery. This large‐scale study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the long‐term outcomes of the patients who underwent reoperation or TC of PVLs. Methods and Results A total of 335 (men, 209 [62.4%]; mean age, 58.15±12.77 years) patients who underwent treatment of PVL at 3 tertiary centers between January 2002 and December 2021 were included. Echocardiographic features, procedure details, and in‐hospital or long‐term outcomes were assessed. The primary end point was defined as the all‐cause death during follow‐up. The regression models were adjusted by applying the inverse probability weighted approach to reduce treatment selection bias. The initial management strategy was TC in 171 (51%) patients and surgery in 164 (49%) cases. Three hundred cases (89.6%) had mitral PVL, and 35 (10.4%) had aortic PVL. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52.03±10.79%. Technical (78.9 versus 76.2%; P=0.549) and procedural success (73.7 versus 65.2%; P=0.093) were similar between both groups. In both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis, the in‐hospital mortality rate in the overall population was significantly higher (15.9 versus 4.7%) in the surgery group compared with the TC group (unadjusted odds ratio, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.75–5.88]; P=0.001; and adjusted odds ratio (inverse probability‐weighted), 4.55 [95% CI, 2.27–10.0]; P

Introduction: Indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continue to expand. Very often TAVI must be done in large annuli. Implantation of the bigger prostheses is often associated with more procedural problems, which may affect the outcomes. Aim: To compare the outcomes of TAVI procedures using the self-expandable Medtronic Evolut R 34 with the smaller Evolut R or Evolut Pro 23, 26 or 29. Material and methods: We analysed 87 patients who received self-expandable Medtronic Evolut R and Pro valves. Group I consisted of 59 (67.81%) patients with Evolut 23, 26 or 29, and group II consisted of 28 (32.18%) patients who received an Evolut 34 valve. Results: EuroSCORE II was 5.59 in group I vs 7.87 in group II (p = 0.02). The oversizing rate was higher in group II: 24.1% vs. 18.5% (p < 0.001). The procedure and fluoroscopy times were longer in group II: 209 vs. 187 min (p = 0.03), 44 vs. 27 min (p = 0.01). Moderate paravalvular leak was found more frequently in group II: 5 v 1 (p = 0.04). There was less device success in group II: 22 (78.57%) vs. 57 (96.6%) (p = 0.05). Early safety criteria were similar in both groups: 52 (88.1%) and 24 (92.3%) (p = 0.56). 30-day mortality was similar: 4 (6.7%) vs. 0 in group I and II respectively (p = 0.16). Conclusions: TAVI procedures in patients requiring an Evolut R 34 prosthesis are more challenging than in those who need smaller valves. Paravalvular leaks are more frequently observed after TAVI with Evolut R 34, which results in lower device success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) using the intermittent simple suture technique versus the horizontal matrix suture technique with pledgeted in terms of paravalvular leakage and infective endocarditis. Materials and Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 422 patients who underwent MVR between 2019 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the suture technique used: group B (simple suture technique) and group P (horizontal matrix suture technique with pledgeted). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the groups, resulting in 62 case pairs for comparative analysis. Results: There were no intraoperative mortalities, and the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time did not significantly differ between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of total hospitalization time, early mortality, cerebrovascular events and arrhythmias. Postoperative echocardiography revealed minimal paravalvular leakage in both groups with non-serious leakage observed in four patients in group B and two patients in group P. The incidence of infective endocarditis was one in group B and two in group P. Hemolysis indicators showed higher mean values in the simple suture technique group although not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that there is no significant difference in the incidence of paravalvular leak and infective endocarditis between the intermittent simple suture technique and the horizontal matrix suture technique with pledgeted. Both techniques can be safely employed in MVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Paravalvular leaks can be detected in almost 15% of patients after mitral valve prosthesis implantation. This complication can result in congestive heart failure and hemolysis. Despite advancements in non-invasive imaging, percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks is not always successful. Therefore, efforts are made to improve treatment outcomes by using 3D-printed models of defects as pre-procedural support for interventional cardiologists. Methods: Retrospectively, 3D-transesophageal echocardiography recordings of 8 patients with clinically signifiant mitral paravalvular leaks were analyzed. Qlab Software was used to export DICOM images of each paravalvular leak channel, including surrounding tissue. Image segmentation was performed in 3D Slicer, a free, open-source software package used for imaging research. Models were printed to actual size with the poly jet Stratasys Objet 30 printer with a transparent, rigid material. Results: Duration of model preparation and printing, as well as the total cost, was calculated. Mean total time of model preparation was 430.5 ± 196 minutes. Conclusion: 3D-printing from 3D-transesophageal echocardiography is technically feasible. Both shape and location of paravalvular leaks are preserved during model preparation and printing. It remains to be tested if 3D-printing would improve outcomes of percutaneous paravalvular leaks closure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcatheter valve replacement has experienced substantial growth in the past decade and this technique can now be used for any of the four heart valves. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has overtaken surgical aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is often performed in pre-existing valves or after prior valve repair, although numerous devices are undergoing trials for replacement of native valves. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is similarly under active development. Lastly, transcatheter pulmonic valve replacement (TPVR) is most often used for revision treatment of congenital heart disease. Given the growth of these techniques, radiologists are increasingly called upon to interpret post-procedural imaging for these patients, particularly with CT. These cases will often arise unexpectedly and require detailed knowledge of potential post-procedural appearances. We review both normal and abnormal post-procedural findings on CT. Certain complications—device migration or embolization, paravalvular leak, or leaflet thrombosis—can occur after replacement of any valve. Other complications are specific to each type of valve, including coronary artery occlusion after TAVR, coronary artery compression after TPVR, or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after TMVR. Finally, we review access-related complications, which are of particular concern due to the requirement of large-bore catheters for these procedures. • Transcatheter valve replacement has expanded tremendously and radiologists should be familiar with post-procedural findings. • Complications after transcatheter valve replacement can include device migration, paravalvular leak, or leaflet thrombosis. • Some complications are specific to each valve, including coronary artery occlusion after TAVR or LVOT obstruction after TMVR. • Large bore catheters are required for transcatheter valve replacement and may be associated with additional complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AimsAs indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continue to expand towards younger and lower-risk patients, durability becomes an increasingly important question. Durability decreases as leaflet stresses increase, but the impact of transcatheter heart valve (THV) size on stress is unknown. Patient annulus sizes can fall within "grey zones" between 2 TAVR sizes. Our aim was to examine the impact of balloon-expandable THV size on leaflet stresses.Methods and resultsSapienXT 23mm, 26mm, and 29mm sizes (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc) underwent micro-computed tomography scanning to create THV computational models then loaded to systemic pressure using finite element software. THV leaflet maximum principal stresses were 1.69MPa (23mm), 1.70MPa (26mm), and 2.12MPa (29mm) at mean arterial pressure. For intermediate annulus sizes, undersizing the larger THV yielded lower leaflet stresses than oversizing the smaller THV.ConclusionsIncreasing THV size yielded greater leaflet maximum principal stresses, which could suggest a relationship between THV size and long-term durability.. For annulus "grey zones" sizes, undersizing the larger THV resulted in lower leaflet stresses than oversizing the smaller THV. These results may influence optimal device sizing, as THV durability remains an important, unanswered question.

Significant progress has been made in both valves and delivery systems (DSs) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. We aimed to present one-year real-life data regarding TAVR procedures using Portico transcatheter heart valves (THVs) with new-generation, low-profile FlexNav DSs. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 169 consecutive patients (mean age: 75.8 years, 68% females) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with Portico THVs and FlexNav DSs between 2020 and 2021. We evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes, following the VARC-3 consensus, periprocedurally and at 30 days and 1 year. Procedural success was observed in 95.9% of cases, and no procedural mortality occurred. At 30 days, the rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological events were 4.7%, 3.6%, and 3.0%, respectively. Additionally, major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, and bleeding were recorded at rates of 11.2%, 14.8%, and 7.7%, respectively. The 1-year data showed all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological event rates of 10.7%, 8.3%, and 7.7%, respectively. The moderate paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker rates at 1 year were 2.6% and 12.2%, respectively. This real-life data provided evidence of positive outcomes and high technical success with Portico THVs and FlexNav DSs. Furthermore, we found low rates of mortality and neurological events, with satisfactory hemodynamic and functional results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Mechanisms of paravalvular leak (PVL) after mitral valve replacement have not been fully delineated. Herein, we report a case of structures on the ventricular side of the mitral valve in a patient with an extremely late PVL. Case summary A 68-year-old female underwent aortic and mitral valve replacement with a mechanical valve 29 years ago. She was in good health for 28 years. However, exertional dyspnoea appeared 8 months ago. She was admitted to our hospital for congestive heart failure and haemolytic anaemia. Echocardiography showed severe regurgitation due to PVL of the mitral valve. The fluoroscopy showed that a circular calcification was found below the mitral prosthesis. The operation was performed through a median sternotomy. After the aortic cross-clamp, the aortic mechanical valve was removed. The ventricular side of the mitral valve was inspected with the endoscope through the aortic annulus before manoeuvers were performed in the mitral valve. A gap was seen between the prosthetic valve and annular tissue and subvalvular calcification. A bioprosthetic valve was placed with a modified collar-reinforcement technique using a xenopericardium strip. The postoperative course was uneventful. PVL and haemolysis completely disappeared. Discussion The ventricular side of the prosthetic valve could be observed before the mitral valve was removed. Not only the protruding circular calcification and displacement of the prosthetic valve to the atrial side but also the loss of adhesion and adhesive nature of the annular tissue played a definitive role in the late PVL occurrence and recurrence after percutaneous or surgical repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Heterotopic bicaval stenting or caval valve implantation (CAVI) either with non-dedicated balloon-expandable Sapien™ valves (Edwards Lifesciences) or with dedicated TricValve™ (Products + Features) has emerged as a safe and effective percutaneous treatment for high-risk patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). One technical difficulty of CAVI is the lack of native calcified structures to anchor the device, which may lead to paravalvular leak or migration. Cases summary We describe two patients with severe TR and high surgical risk who underwent CAVI procedures, both of them complicated with device migration to the right atrium (one inferior vena cava device and one superior vena cava device). Both cases were treated with a caval valve-in-valve procedure, with good technical and clinical results. Discussion With the recent development of several percutaneous interventions for high-risk patients with severe TR, the rate of some possible complications is not well established, and neither are the better managing strategies. Device embolization is a rare complication of transcatheter heart interventions but with potential catastrophic consequences. Less invasive strategies such as the valve-in-valve procedure may be preferable in order to avoid the exposure of these patients to complex heart surgeries with extracorporeal circulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) is still a demanding procedure due to the complex anatomy of PVL channels and risk of interference between the implanted occluder and surrounding structures. Efforts are made to improve procedural outcomes in transcatheter structural heart interventions by establishing treatment strategy in advance with the use of 3D-printed physical models based on data obtained from cardiac computed tomography (CT) studies. Aim: In this feasibility study 3D printing of PVL models based on data recorded during transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations was evaluated. Material and methods: 3D-TEE data of patients with significant PVL around mitral valve prostheses were used to prepare 3D models. QLab software was used to export DICOM images in Cartesian DICOM format of each PVL with the surrounding tissue. Image segmentation was performed in Slicer, a free, open-source software package used for imaging research. Models were printed to actual size with the Polyjet printer with a transparent, rigid material. We measured dimensions of PVLs both in TEE recordings and printed 3D models. The results were correlated with sizes of occluding devices used to close the defects. Results: In 7 out of 8 patients, there was concordance between procedurally implanted occluders and pre-procedurally matched closing devices based on 3D-printed models. Conclusions: 3D-printing from 3D-TEE is technically feasible. Both shape and location of PVLs are preserved during model preparation and printing. It remains to be tested whether 3D printing would improve outcomes of percutaneous PVL closure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A paravalvular leak (PVL) is a complication following valve replacement, which may lead to heart failure and hemolysis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the clinical outcome after transcatheter PVL closure differs according to the prominent indication of the procedure (symptoms of heart failure or hemolysis). Methods: The data of consecutive patients who had transcatheter treatment for PVL between July 2011 and September 2022 in five Greek centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the technical, and clinical success rates with regards to the prominent indication of paravalvular leak closure. The secondary endpoints included the evaluation and comparison of the clinical and technical success in relation to the type of valve that was treated (aortic or mitral) as well as the survival analysis in relation to the closure indication and type of valve that was treated. Results: In total, 60 patients were retrospectively studied (39% men, mean age 69.5 ± 11 years). Regarding the primary outcomes, the technical success in patients mainly suffering from hemolysis was 86.1%, while in those presenting heart failure it was 95.8%, p = 0.387. Furthermore, the clinical success was 72.2% and 87.5% among hemolysis and heart failure patients, respectively, p = 0.210. During the follow-up period, the two-year survival rates were significantly better for patients treated for the aortic valve (78.94%) compared to those in the mitral position (48.78%), p = 0.014. In total, 25 patients died (41.7%) during 24 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates without any difference according to the prominent indication of closure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Third-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are designed to improve outcomes. Data on the new intra-annular self-expanding NAVITOR are scarce. Aims: The aim of this analysis was to compare outcomes between the PORTICO and the NAVITOR systems. Methods: Data from 782 patients with severe native aortic stenosis treated with PORTICO (n = 645) or NAVITOR (n = 137) from 05/2012 to 09/2022 were evaluated. The clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of 276 patients (PORTICO, n = 139; NAVITOR, n = 137) were evaluated according to VARC-3 recommendations. Results: Rates of postprocedural more-than-mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) were significantly lower for NAVITOR than for PORTICO (7.2% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.041). In addition, severe bleeding rates (27.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.005) and major vascular complications (5.8% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.036) were lower in the NAVITOR group. The mean gradients (7 vs. 8 mmHg, p = 0.121) and calculated aortic valve areas (1.90 cm2 vs. 1.99 cm2, p = 0.235) were comparable. Rates of PPI were similarly high in both groups (15.3 vs. 21.6, p = 0.299). Conclusions: The NAVITOR demonstrated favorable in-hospital procedural outcome data, with lower rates of relevant PVL, major vascular complications, and severe bleeding than its predecessor the PORTICO and preserved favorable hemodynamic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently becoming the method of choice in high-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Post-TAVI complications are more common owing to the increasing use of the method. The majority of TAVI complications derive from concomitant aortic stenosis with moderate/severe aortic insufficiency, paravalvular leak, and atrioventricular block. The contemporary TAVI qualification process includes a thorough echocardiography and angio-CT of the aorta, which is crucial in assessing valve measurements, determining the position of the coronary arteries branching from the aorta, and choosing the optimal valve size. We present the case report of an 81-year-old patient admitted to our hospital because of exacerbation of the clinical condition and development of pulmonary edema a few days after TAVI. Despite the reduction of the initial leak, an echocardiographic examination revealed the remaining severe paravalvular aortic leakage. We performed open-heart cardio-thoracic surgery, explanted the TAVI valve, and implanted the biological prosthesis (Edwards Perimount Magna size 25). Introduction of new interventional treatment approaches and the availability of imaging tools have substantially reduced the incidence of significant paravalvular leak and offered a better prognosis for patients undergoing TAVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Valve reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) failure has not been studied in detail. The authors sought to determine outcomes of TAVR surgical explantation (TAVR-explant) vs redo-TAVR because they are largely unknown. From May 2009 to February 2022, 396 patients in the international EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR registry underwent TAVR-explant (181, 46.4%) or redo-TAVR (215, 54.3%) for transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure during a separate admission from the initial TAVR. Outcomes were reported at 30 days and 1 year. The incidence of reintervention after THV failure was 0.59% with increasing volume during the study period. Median time from index-TAVR to reintervention was shorter in TAVR-explant vs redo-TAVR (17.6 months [IQR: 5.0-40.7 months] vs 45.7 months [IQR: 10.6-75.6 months]; P < 0.001], respectively. TAVR-explant had more prosthesis–patient mismatch (17.1% vs 0.5%; P < 0.001) as the indication for reintervention, whereas redo-TAVR had more structural valve degeneration (63.7% vs 51.9%; P = 0.023), with a similar incidence of ≥moderate paravalvular leak between groups (28.7% vs 32.8% in redo-TAVR; P = 0.44). There was a similar proportion of balloon-expandable THV failures (39.8% TAVR-explant vs 40.5% redo-TAVR; P = 0.92). Median follow-up was 11.3 (IQR: 1.6-27.1 months) after reintervention. Compared with redo-TAVR, TAVR-explant had higher mortality at 30 days (13.6% vs 3.4%; P < 0.001) and 1 year (32.4% vs 15.4%; P = 0.001), with similar stroke rates between groups. On landmark analysis, mortality was similar between groups after 30 days (P = 0.91). In this first report of the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR global registry, TAVR-explant had a shorter median time to reintervention, with less structural valve degeneration, more prosthesis–patient mismatch, and similar paravalvular leak rates compared with redo-TAVR. TAVR-explant had higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year, but similar rates on landmark analysis after 30 days. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Technological advancements in transcatheter heart valve platforms are essential in order to achieve high standards of efficacy and safety in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Aim: To evaluate the performance of the new version of the Portico valve delivery system (FlexNav) as compared to the first-generation device. Material and methods: In this single-center, observational study consecutive patients undergoing Portico valve implantation with the new FlexNav delivery system (DS) were compared with patients treated with the first-generation delivery system (1st gen DS). In-hospital outcomes were self-adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 definition. Results: Fifty patients were included in this study; 22 were treated with the FlexNav DS and the remaining patients with the 1st gen DS. Clinical characteristics were similar between groups, except for older age (82.6 ±3.6 vs. 80.7 ±3.8; p = 0.07) and higher prevalence of female gender (68.2% vs. 39.3%; p = 0.04) in the FlexNav DS group as compared to the 1st gen DS group, respectively. We observed similar rates of procedural success but higher rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak in the 1st gen DS as compared to FlexNav DS group (28.6% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.03); major vascular complications were reduced, although not significantly, in the FlexNav DS as compared to the 1st gen DS group (4.5% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.64). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the FlexNav DS, thanks to its lower profile and enhanced stability during valve deployment, might be associated with reduced rates of vascular complications and moderate to severe paravalvular leak, thus improving procedural results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paravalvular leak (PVL) on a surgically implanted mitral valve (mitral valve replacement, MVR) is a relatively common complication. Repeat surgery was the only possibility of its management in the past. Gradually, however, catheterisation procedures have been developed to allow closure without a conventional surgical approach. Catheter closure of PVL reduces the duration of procedure, the length of hospital stay, and the number of complications including death. We report the indications, diagnostic methods, catheterisation procedures, materials used, and clinical outcomes of PVL closure after MVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as a feasible alternative to surgical reoperation in failed bioprostheses and rings. Residual mitral regurgitation following TMVR can present as a valve-in-valve paravalvular leak (PVL) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Current therapies for valve-in-valve PVL are limited. We present a case of a symptomatic patient with severe valve-in-valve PVL after TMVR for a previous surgical bioprosthesis leak, who then underwent a second TMVR as a valve-in-valve-in-valve implantation with a 29 mm Edwards? SAPIEN 3 valve via transseptal approach using three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. This unique case highlights the complexity of this clinical entity and recognizes 3D transesophageal echocardiography as a valuable tool to guide valve-in-valve PVL closures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The self-expanding, intra-annular Navitor (Abbott Structural Heart) valve includes an outer cuff to reduce paravalvular leak (PVL) and large stent cells for future coronary access. The purpose of the PORTICO NG (Evaluation of the Portico NG [Next Generation] Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High and Extreme Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Navitor valve in patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis who are at high or extreme surgical risk. PORTICO NG is a prospective, multicenter, global study with follow-up at 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years. The primary endpoints are all-cause mortality and moderate or greater PVL at 30 days. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 events and valve performance are assessed by an independent clinical events committee and echocardiographic core laboratory. A total of 260 subjects were treated at 26 clinical sites across Europe, Australia, and the United States between September 2019 and August 2022. The mean age was 83.4 ± 5.4 years, 57.3% were female, and the average Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 3.9% ± 2.1%. At 30 days, the rate of all-cause mortality was 1.9%, and no subjects had moderate or greater PVL. The rate of disabling stroke was 1.9%, life-threatening bleeding was 3.8%, stage 3 acute kidney injury was 0.8%, major vascular complications were 4.2%, and new permanent pacemaker implantation was 19.0%. Hemodynamic performance included a mean gradient of 7.4 ± 3.5 mm Hg and an effective orifice area of 2.00 ± 0.47 cm2. The Navitor valve is safe and effective for the treatment of subjects with severe aortic stenosis who are at high or greater risk for surgery, which is supported by low rates of adverse events and PVL. (Evaluation of the Portico NG [Next Generation] Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High and Extreme Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis [PORTICO NG]; NCT04011722) [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A few data exist on the differences of implantable aortic valve bio-prostheses. We investigate three generations of self-expandable aortic valves in terms of the outcomes. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were allocated into three groups according to the valve type: group A (CoreValveTM), group B (EvolutTMR) and group C (EvolutTMPRO). The implantation depth, device success, electrocardiographic parameters, need for permanent pacemaker (PPM), and paravalvular leak (PVL) were assessed. In the study, 129 patients were included. The final implantation depth did not differ among the groups (p = 0.07). CoreValveTM presented greater upward jump of the valve at release (2.88 ± 2.33 mm vs. 1.48 ± 1.09 mm and 1.71 ± 1.35 mm, for groups A, B, and C, respectively, p = 0.011). The device success (at least 98% for all groups, p = 1.00) and PVL rates (67% vs. 58%, vs. 60% for groups A, B, and C, respectively, p = 0.64) did not differ. PPM implantation within 24 h (33% vs. 19% vs. 7% for groups A, B, and C, respectively, p = 0.006) and until discharge (group A: 38% vs. group B: 19% and group C: 9%, p = 0.005) was lower in the newer generation valves. Newer generation valves present better device positioning, more predictable deployment, and fewer rates of PPM implantation. No significant difference in PVL was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a recognized and challenging complication after surgical or transcatheter valve replacement. The transcatheter closure of PVL has become the first-line treatment in clinical practice when the procedure is not contraindicated. Transcatheter PVL closure rests on a complex procedure and complications still occur in approximately 9% of patients. Case Report: We describe the case of a delayed mechanical prosthetic leaflet impingement after transcatheter closure of a paravalvular leak associated with a Valsalva pseudoaneurysm that required an urgent surgery. Conclusion: Aorta–left ventricle communication could be a relative contraindication to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, but transcatheter closure does not preclude subsequent attempt for surgical repair and outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a shortcoming that can erode the clinical benefits of transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) and therefore a readily applicable method (aortography) to quantitate PVL objectively and accurately in the interventional suite is appealing to all operators. The ratio between the areas of the time-density curves in the aorta and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT-AR) defines the regurgitation fraction (RF). This technique has been validated in a mock circulation; a single injection in diastole was further tested in porcine and ovine models. In the clinical setting, LVOT-AR was compared with trans-thoracic and trans-oesophageal echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. LVOT-AR > 17% discriminates mild from moderate aortic regurgitation on echocardiography and confers a poor prognosis in multiple registries, and justifies balloon post-dilatation. The LVOT-AR differentiates the individual performances of many old and novel devices and is being used in ongoing randomized trials and registries.

Transesophageal echocardiography is the main imaging modality for localizing and quantifying prosthetic aortic regurgitation. We describe a case of bioprosthetic aortic paravalvular leak (PVL) where transesophageal echocardiography was inadequate; aortic root angiography and computed tomography fusion were critical in diagnosing and guiding closure. Multimodality imaging can be pivotal in localizing PVL and guiding transcatheter PVL closure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Vasoplegic syndrome (VS) is characterized by low systemic vascular resistance paired with relatively preserved cardiac output that may result in increased morbidity and mortality rate after open-heart surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass. We report a case of a 61-year-old male who underwent redo open-heart surgery due to a paravalvular leak of the previous implanted mitral bioprosthesis and severe tricuspid regurgitation. The patient experienced the VS in the intensive care unit after the operation. He was resuscitated by vasopressors and recovered uneventfully.