Search

Background: Clinically significant macular edema (CME) is the leading cause of visual loss after ophthalmologic surgery due to the release of inflammatory mediators promoted by the procedures. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intravitreal Ozurdex® (700 µg dexamethasone) implants as a primary therapeutical option for post-surgical macular edema cases. Methods: Patients with post-surgical macular edema diagnosed by optical coherence tomography (Cirrus SD-OCT) and treated with Ozudex were selected for the current study. Data was retrospectively collected from medical records from January 2020 to December 2022 and included sex, age, laterality, and timeline of treatment (i.e. implant alone or at the time of silicon oil removal in cases requiring vitreorretinal surgery). Complications associated with treatment were also noted as well as the need of further treatments. The structural analysis focused on measuring central macular thickness (CMT—average thickness within the 1 mm circle of the ETDRS) from the internal limiting membrane to the Bruch's membrane complex, as well as the average total macular thickness including parafoveal and perifoveal regions determined by the device (CAT). The functional evaluation was based on the best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measured in logMAR. Results: A total of 46 participants were included (56.2% males, mean age: 60.9 ± 11.2 years old). A statistically significant change was observed in the postoperative versus the preoperative period for all parameters (p < 0.05). The mean VA difference was − 0.17 ± 0.24; CMT was − 109.22 ± 124.85 and CAT was − 14.76 ± 58.95. We observed a significant effect of the moment of Ozurdex implantation on VA improvement, so that cases with implantation at the time of oil removal showed lower improvement than cases with implantation at a distinct timing (Coef. 0.19, 95%CI: 0.02 to 0.36, p = 0.027). Eleven cases (23.9%) required further treatment such as new Ozurdex implantation (8 cases) or surgery (3 cases). Only one case (2.17%) showed increased intraocular pressure and underwent glaucoma surgery. Conclusions: Intravitreal Ozurdex implants significantly improved functional and structural aspects in post-surgical macular edema. The timing of implantation influenced VA improvement, with a distinct step approach showing better outcomes than at the time of oil removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To demonstrate the treatment efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant in chronic recurrent/persistent central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Design: Prospective, non-randomized, open-label study. Methods: In this study, subjects with chronic CSC without signs of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) received intravitreal DEX implant therapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in visual acuity. Changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and change in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), incidence of recurrent fluid, and safety of DEX implant were secondary outcome measures. Subjects were followed up for a minimum of 3 months after DEX implantation. Results: In total, 20 eyes of 20 subjects (mean age: 47 ± 9 years) with a median disease duration of 23.5 months were enrolled. With a single injection of DEX implant, a reduction in CMT was noted in 90% of eyes. Complete resolution of subretinal and intraretinal fluid was noted in 55% of eyes within 3 months of injection. A significant improvement in vision (mean Log MAR visual acuity: 0.66 ± 0.49 vs. 0.54 ± 0.45; P = 0.020), mean CMT (338 ± 110 microns to 238 ± 73 microns; P < 0.001) and SFCT (514 ± 95 microns to 445 ± 111 microns; P < 0.001) was noted over 3 months. Recurrent fluid was noted in 50% of eyes after a mean follow-up duration of 7 ± 4 months. Elevated intraocular pressure, managed by topical therapy, was noted in six eyes. Conclusion: The consistent improvement in visual acuity, fluid resolution, and reduction in choroidal thickness suggests a possible role for DEX implants in managing chronic CSC. A larger randomized trial is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of intermediate and posterior uveitis poses a significant challenge of achieving adequate drug concentrations in the posterior segment over the chronic nature of the disease. Systemic agents seldom reach effective drug levels, and even with low maintenance or tapering doses, it is hard to avoid systemic toxicity. The use of intravitreal and periocular injections is often unable to prevent recurrences due to their short half-life. Since the emergence of intravitreal implants (Vitrasert, Retisert), it has become possible to circumvent these therapeutic challenges. A detailed review in the PubMed index yielded 155 articles, of which 22 were analyzed based on exclusion criteria. A recent shift from surgically sutured to minimally invasive injectable implants mainly indicated for noninfectious uveitis is evident from the literature. This review article also provides insights into dexamethasone (Ozurdex) and recent fluocinolone acetonide (Yutiq, Iluvien) implants with particular emphasis on their improved safety and efficacy. Dexamethasone implants favor the therapeutic goal of prevention of recurrences, whereas the use of fluocinolone implants helps to attain better visual outcomes due to their longer duration of action. Thus, the review provides recent literature supporting the role and indication of sustained release intravitreal implants in the management of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Clinically significant macular edema (CME) is the leading cause of visual loss after ophthalmologic surgery due to the release of inflammatory mediators promoted by the procedures. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intravitreal Ozurdex® (700 µg dexamethasone) implants as a primary therapeutical option for post-surgical macular edema cases. Methods Patients with post-surgical macular edema diagnosed by optical coherence tomography (Cirrus SD-OCT) and treated with Ozudex were selected for the current study. Data was retrospectively collected from medical records from January 2020 to December 2022 and included sex, age, laterality, and timeline of treatment (i.e. implant alone or at the time of silicon oil removal in cases requiring vitreorretinal surgery). Complications associated with treatment were also noted as well as the need of further treatments. The structural analysis focused on measuring central macular thickness (CMT—average thickness within the 1 mm circle of the ETDRS) from the internal limiting membrane to the Bruch’s membrane complex, as well as the average total macular thickness including parafoveal and perifoveal regions determined by the device (CAT). The functional evaluation was based on the best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measured in logMAR. Results A total of 46 participants were included (56.2% males, mean age: 60.9 ± 11.2 years old). A statistically significant change was observed in the postoperative versus the preoperative period for all parameters (p

Somnath Chakraborty,1 Jay Umed Sheth2 1Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Retina Institute of Bengal, Siliguri, West Bengal, India; 2Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Shantilal Shanghvi Eye Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IndiaCorrespondence: Somnath Chakraborty, Senior Consultant, Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Retina Institute of Bengal, Siliguri, West Bengal, India, Email somnathboom@gmail.comPurpose: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (DEX) and Brolucizumab Injection in treating Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) with Hyperreflective Intraretinal Dots (HRID).Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective study in India included 40 eyes (20 per group) with controlled diabetes and HRID on optical coherence tomography. Patients received either DEX or Brolucizumab, with outcomes assessed at various intervals up to 24 weeks. Primary measures included Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Central Macular Thickness (CMT), and safety parameters.Results: Both treatment groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics. Both treatments significantly improved the BCVA at weeks 4, 12, and 24, with the DEX implant showing significantly better results at week 12 than brolucizumab (P=0.04). In treatment-naïve eyes, BCVA improvements were similar across all time points. In recalcitrant DME eyes, DEX showed significant BCVA improvements at all time points, while brolucizumab showed significant improvements only at weeks 4 (P=0.005) and 24 (P=0.04). The CMT also improved with both treatments, with DEX showing superior reduction at weeks 4 (P=0.003), 12 (P=0.003), and 24 (P=0.002) respectively. In treatment-naïve eyes, DEX showed consistently better CMT reductions. In refractory DME eyes, both treatments significantly reduced CMT, with DEX performing better at week 12 (P=0.042). DEX required fewer injections (DEX: 1.5± 0.61; brolucizumab: 2.4± 0.82; P=0.0002) and less supplementary laser treatment (DEX:8/20, 40% eyes; brolucizumab: 16/20, 80%; P=0.01) compared to brolucizumab. No adverse events were observed in either group.Conclusion: The study suggests the potential superiority of intravitreal DEX implant over brolucizumab in managing DME with HRID. DEX exhibited sustained positive responses in BCVA and CMT, requiring fewer injections and supplementary interventions. Future research should explore extended follow-up durations, personalized treatment strategies, and refined biomarkers to optimize DME management.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex, brolucizumab, hyperreflective intraretinal dots

Abstract Background To report a case of cataract surgery in unintentional Ozurdex (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California, USA) injection into the lens. Case presentation A 82-years old man reporting decreased visual acuity in his right eye came to our Ophthalmology service. Due to the clinical history, and on the basis of ophthalmoscopic and imaging examinations diabetic macular edema was diagnosed. Thus, intravitreal dexamethasone implant was scheduled and therefore performed. The following day Ozurdex appeared to be located into the lens. After careful evaluation and strict follow up examinations, due to the risks associated with the presence of the implant into the lens, phacoemulsification with Ozurdex removal and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was scheduled and performed. Conclusions In this case report we reported the surgical management of accidental into-the lens dexamethasone implant carefully taking into account the dexamethasone pharmacokinetic.

Background: To report a case of cataract surgery in unintentional Ozurdex (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California, USA) injection into the lens. Case presentation: A 82-years old man reporting decreased visual acuity in his right eye came to our Ophthalmology service. Due to the clinical history, and on the basis of ophthalmoscopic and imaging examinations diabetic macular edema was diagnosed. Thus, intravitreal dexamethasone implant was scheduled and therefore performed. The following day Ozurdex appeared to be located into the lens. After careful evaluation and strict follow up examinations, due to the risks associated with the presence of the implant into the lens, phacoemulsification with Ozurdex removal and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was scheduled and performed. Conclusions: In this case report we reported the surgical management of accidental into-the lens dexamethasone implant carefully taking into account the dexamethasone pharmacokinetic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the impact of switching to, or adding, an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Dex; Ozurdex®) in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy on disease stability and treatment intervals in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent disease activity and high treatment demand. Methods: This retrospective noncomparative multicenter longitudinal case series included pseudophakic eyes with nAMD and persistent retinal fluid despite regular anti-VEGF therapy (ranibizumab or aflibercept) that received at least 1 intravitreal Dex implant. Visual acuity, central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure were recorded before, and after, the addition of Dex to anti-VEGF therapy. Results: Sixteen eyes of 16 patients met the inclusion criteria of persistent fluid despite anti-VEGF therapy, under treatment intervals of ≤7 weeks in 14 instances. Patients were 80.9 ± 7.4 years old and had received 25.5 ± 17.4 anti-VEGF injections before Dex over a period of 36.4 ± 21.9 months before switching. The treatment interval increased from 5.5 ± 3.2 weeks between the last anti-VEGF and first Dex injection to 11.7 ± 7.3 weeks thereafter (P = 0.022). CRT remained stable (385.3 ± 152.1, 383.9 ± 129.7, and 458.3 ± 155.2 μm before switching as well as 12 and 24 months after switching; P = 0.78 and P = 0.36, respectively). An insignificant mean short-term early increase in visual acuity was not sustained over time. Conclusions: The addition of Dex resulted in a relevant and sustained increase in treatment intervals, whereas CRT and visual acuity remained stable in these difficult-to-treat eyes. It may be discussed whether inflammation or other steroid-responsive factors play a significant role in cases of nAMD with nonsatisfactory responses to anti-VEGF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ozurdex had shown promising anatomical and functional outcomes in managing refractory Irvine–Gass syndrome over the years. Burgeoning usage of Ozurdex has prompted the study of its related complications, particularly the anterior chamber migration of the implant. Methods: Literature reviews on the anterior chamber migration of the Ozurdex via PubMed, EBSCO, and TRIP databases were searched from 2012 to 2020. The predisposing factors, outcomes, and management of such cases were evaluated. Results: A total of 54 articles consisting of 105 cases of anterior migration of Ozurdex were included in this analysis. The vitrectomized eye and compromised posterior capsule were highly associated with this complication. About 81.9% of the cases had cornea edema upon presentation, with 31.4% of them ending up with cornea decompensation despite intervention. Although there was high intraocular pressure reported initially in 22 cases, only 2 cases required glaucoma filtration surgeries in which they had preexisting glaucoma. Numerous techniques of repositioning or surgical removal of the implant were described but they were challenging and the outcomes varied. Conclusions: A noninvasive method of manipulating the Ozurdex into the vitreous cavity via the "Trendelenburg position, external pressure with head positioning" maneuvers is safe yet achieves a favorable outcome. Precaution must be taken whenever offering Ozurdex to the high-risk eyes. Prompt repositioning or removal of the implant is crucial to deter cornea decompensation. Clinical Trial Registration number: NMRR-22-02092-S9X (from the Medical Research and Ethics Committee (MREC), Ministry of Health, Malaysia). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Manqiao Wang,&ast; Rong Luan,&ast; Boshi Liu, Yi Gong, Jinzhi Zhao, Xiteng Chen, Qianhui Yang, Jingjie Liu, Juping Liu, Yan Shao, Xiaorong Li Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yan Shao; Xiaorong Li, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 17622651170; +86 18622818042, Email sytmueh@163.com; xiaorli@163.comPurpose: To investigate the 3-months outcomes of patients who underwent intraoperative intravitreal injection of Ozurdex for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (ChiCTR2100043399). Seventy-one patients with PDR who had indications for surgery without intravitreal injection history within 3 months preoperatively were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into three groups based on the medicine injected intraoperatively: Ozurdex, Conbercept, and Control group. The primary outcome is the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) within 3 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes include the intraocular pressure (IOP), mean sensitivity, central retinal thickness and vessels perfusion.Results: The BCVA and the mean sensitivity improved in the three groups (F = 130.8, P < 0.0001; F = 34.18, P < 0.0001), but there was no statistical difference among the three groups (F = 0.858, P = 0.552; F = 0.964, P = 0.452). The IOP was no significant differences among the three groups within 3 months postoperatively (F = 0.881, P = 0.533). Compared with the other two groups, central retinal thickness (CRT) and outer retinal layer (ORL) thickness decreased significantly in patients of the Ozurdex group (F = 3.037, P = 0.008; F = 2.626, P = 0.018), especially in the diabetic macular edema (DME) patients (F = 2.761, P = 0.0164; F = 2.572, P = 0.0240). In macular region, superficial vascular plexus (SVP), intermediate capillary plexus (ICP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) perfusion were not shown statistical difference at 3 months postoperatively in the all three groups compared with 1 day postoperatively (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Compared with the other two groups, anatomical outcomes was improved significantly in Ozurdex group for DR patients. Ozurdex may help to improve the visual acuity and visual sensitivity, and there is no significant difference in the change of IOP and microvascular improvement.Clinical Trial Registration: This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn, registration number ChiCTR2100043399).Keywords: proliferative diabetic retinopathy, ozurdex, pars plana vitrectomy, optical coherence tomography angiography, microperimetry

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the short-term effects (hours-days) of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eyes with DME and 3–9 injections of ranibizumab without a good response were included. Patients underwent a single IDI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, complete ophthalmic evaluation, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline, 2 h, 3 h, 24 h, 7 days, and 1 month. The main outcomes were change in central retinal thickness (CRT) on SD-OCT and BCVA. Results Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Mean CRT decreased after treatment from 515.87 µm ± 220.00 µm at baseline to 489.60 µm ± 176.53 µm after 2 h (p = 0.126), and 450.13 µm ± 163.43 at 24 h (p = 0.006). Change in BCVA was from 0.85 ± 0.44 logMAR baseline to 0.58 ± 0.37 log MAR at 1 month (p = 0.003). Conclusions Eyes treated with IDI showed significant decrease in CRT detectable 1 day after injection. In some patients, the effect could be observed 3 h post-implantation. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05736081 . Registered 20 February 2023, Retrospectively registered.

Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term effects (hours-days) of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eyes with DME and 3–9 injections of ranibizumab without a good response were included. Patients underwent a single IDI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, complete ophthalmic evaluation, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline, 2 h, 3 h, 24 h, 7 days, and 1 month. The main outcomes were change in central retinal thickness (CRT) on SD-OCT and BCVA. Results: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Mean CRT decreased after treatment from 515.87 µm ± 220.00 µm at baseline to 489.60 µm ± 176.53 µm after 2 h (p = 0.126), and 450.13 µm ± 163.43 at 24 h (p = 0.006). Change in BCVA was from 0.85 ± 0.44 logMAR baseline to 0.58 ± 0.37 log MAR at 1 month (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Eyes treated with IDI showed significant decrease in CRT detectable 1 day after injection. In some patients, the effect could be observed 3 h post-implantation. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05736081. Registered 20 February 2023, Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present three cases of acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal sustained-release dexamethasone (Ozurdex) with atypical presentation and to discuss the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective case series of three patients with endophthalmitis following intravitreal sustained-release dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implantation who presented between July 2020 and August 2020. Results: Two of three patients who were treated with topical steroid and antibiotic therapy alone showed favorable outcomes and were managed without the need for intravitreal antibiotics or implant removal. One patient who showed initial response to topical therapy subsequently required pars plana vitrectomy, implant removal, and a single empirical dose of intravitreal antibiotics and antifungal agent due to persistent inflammation. Conclusion: Postintravitreal Ozurdex endophthalmitis, although a rare entity, can present with atypical features of a painless white eye and a delayed onset intraocular inflammation. Although all cases of endophthalmitis should be treated as infective until proven otherwise, it is fair to consider a trial of conservative treatment with topical steroids and antibiotics initially with close monitoring. In cases with poor response to topical therapy, pars planar vitrectomy and implant removal should be strongly considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uveitis refers to a group of ocular inflammatory diseases that can significantly impair vision. Although systemic corticosteroid therapy has shown substantial efficacy in treating uveitis, extensive use of corticosteroids is associated with significant adverse effects. Recently, a biodegradable, sustained-release implant, namely dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex), has been reported for treating non-infectious and infectious uveitis. This review aims to summarize the experiences with Ozurdex treatment across various forms of uveitis and to assist readers in understanding the appropriate timing and potential side effects of Ozurdex in uveitis treatment, thereby maximizing patient benefits in uveitis management.

AIM: To compare the differences in the efficacy and safety of combination of intravitreal dexamethasone(Ozurdex)and ranibizumab or monotherapy of ranibizumab in eyes with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion(RVO-ME).METHODS: Patients diagnosed with non-ischemic RVO-ME by fluorescein fundus angiography in our hospital from June 2020 to December 2022 were selected. All patients were initially treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(0.5 mg), and 42 patients(42 eyes)who had central retinal thickness(CRT)≥300 μm after 2 wk were included. They were randomly divided into combined treatment group and monotherapy group. The combined treatment group(21 eyes)received Ozurdex intravitreal injection immediately, while the monotherapy group(21 eyes)was treated with ranibizumab intravitreal injection by 3+pro re nata(PRN). The changes of best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), CRT, and intraocular pressure before and at 2 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mo after treatment were recorded, and the ocular or systemic complications were observed.RESULTS:The BCVA and CRT of all patients at 2 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mo after treatment were significantly better than those before treatment(all P

Somnath Chakraborty,1 Santanu Ganguly,2 Jay Umed Sheth3 1Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Retina Institute of Bengal, Siliguri, India; 2Department of Anterior Segment Services, Retina Institute of Bengal, Siliguri, India; 3Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Shantilal Shanghvi Eye Institute, Mumbai, MH, IndiaCorrespondence: Somnath Chakraborty, Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Retina Institute of Bengal, Siliguri, India, Email somnathboom@gmail.comPurpose: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of vision impairment, posing challenges in its management due to variable responses and patient diversity. While anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have revolutionized DME treatment, some patients are not suitable candidates for this therapy. Intravitreal corticosteroid therapy, such as the dexamethasone implant (DEX), has emerged as an alternative. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the role of intravitreal DEX in treatment-naive DME patients with systemic contraindications to anti-VEGF therapy, administered one month before cataract surgery.Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective study included 20 eyes with controlled diabetes, visually significant cataracts, untreated DME, and systemic contraindications for anti-VEGF therapy. Patients underwent DEX treatment followed by cataract surgery after one month. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed at multiple time points.Results: BCVA significantly improved on days 30, 90, and 180 post-DEX (P< 0.00001). CMT showed a significant decrease at day 30 (P< 0.00001), which was sustained through days 90 and 180 (P< 0.00001). Recurrent DME was observed in 25% of eyes on day 90. IOP increased significantly at days 30 (P< 0.00001) and 90 (P=0.0006), returning to baseline by day 180. However, only two eyes needed topical anti-glaucoma treatment. No other ocular or systemic adverse events were noted.Conclusion: Intravitreal DEX administered one month before cataract surgery offers a promising treatment strategy for treatment-naive DME patients with systemic contraindications to anti-VEGF therapy. The study’s findings provide insights into improving visual acuity and reducing macular thickness, along with manageable IOP changes. This personalized approach is a valuable addition to DME management, especially for complex medical cases, warranting further research and consideration for clinical practice.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex

Andrea Taloni,1,&ast; Giulia Coco,2,&ast; Davide Rastelli,3 Giacinta Buffon,2 Vincenzo Scorcia,1 Giuseppe Giannaccare4 1Department of Ophthalmology, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; 2Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy; 4Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Giuseppe Giannaccare, Full Professor of Ophthalmology, Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Via Università 40, Cagliari, 09124, Italy, Tel +0039 09613647041, Fax +0039 09613647094, Email giuseppe.giannaccare@gmail.comAbstract: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common sight-threatening complication of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the leading cause of severe visual impairment among the working-age population. Several therapeutic options are available for the management of DME, including intravitreal corticosteroids. They have been traditionally used as second-line treatment, due to the risk of intraocular pressure increase and cataract-related adverse events. However, attention has recently been focused on the primary or early use of intravitreal corticosteroids, due to growing evidence of the crucial role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of DME. Furthermore, intravitreal steroid implants offer the additional advantage of a longer duration of action compared to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (anti-VEGF). This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy and safety profile of dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant, with a specific focus on clinical scenarios in which it might be considered or even preferred as first-line treatment option by adequate selection of patients, considering both advantages and possible adverse events. Patients with contraindications to anti-VEGF, DME with high inflammatory OCT biomarkers, pseudophakic patients and phakic patients’ candidates to cataract surgery as well as vitrectomized eyes may all benefit from first-line DEX implant. Additionally, DME not responders to anti-VEGF should be considered for a switch to DEX implant and a combination therapy of DEX implant and anti-VEGF could be a valid option in severe and persistent DME.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, DME, dexamethasone intravitreal implant, DEX implant, corticosteroids, Ozurdex

Abstract Purpose To describe the common risk factors, complications, and management options for anterior migration of Ozurdex implant. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed. Results Amongst the most common risk factors predisposing to implant anterior migration we found a history of pseudophakia or aphakia or previous vitrectomy. The most common complication is that of corneal edema. Conclusions A variety of management options to treat migration of the dexamethasone implant are utilized by different specialists around the world. These depend on the doctor’s preference, presence of corneal damage and history of previous migrations after repositioning the implant. The most common approaches are operative or non-operative implant repositioning and surgical implant removal.

Background: We aimed to explore microvascular changes evaluated with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with intravitreal Ozurdex implantation, compared with standard PPV. (2) Methods: Prospective interventional analysis on 25 eyes undergoing PPV + Ozurdex (Group A) and 25 eyes undergoing PPV alone. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCTA parameters, such as vessel density (VD) of the superficial and deep capillary plexi (SCP and DCP) in the whole 6.4 mm × 6.4 mm and fovea area, were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months after surgery. (3) Results: Postoperative BCVA significantly improved in both groups. No cases of post-operative cystoid macular edema (CME) were reported in Group A vs. two eyes in Group B. In Group A we found a statistically significant increase of SCP's VD in either the whole image (from 42.1 ± 4.1 to 45.6 ± 4.3%, p = 0.01) and the fovea image (from 38.5 ± 7.5 to 41.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.03). In Group B, we reported no significant variations in the SCP's VDs. In the DCP, VD significantly increased only in the whole image in Group A. Stage 4 ERMs showed the greatest improvement in VD, especially in Group A. (4) Conclusions: Intraoperative Ozurdex prompted a significant BCVA recovery and limited the occurrence of postoperative CME compared to the standard procedure. Moreover, Ozurdex implant is associated with a better restoration of microvascular structure in SCP and DCP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the common risk factors, complications, and management options for anterior migration of Ozurdex implant. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed. Results: Amongst the most common risk factors predisposing to implant anterior migration we found a history of pseudophakia or aphakia or previous vitrectomy. The most common complication is that of corneal edema. Conclusions: A variety of management options to treat migration of the dexamethasone implant are utilized by different specialists around the world. These depend on the doctor's preference, presence of corneal damage and history of previous migrations after repositioning the implant. The most common approaches are operative or non-operative implant repositioning and surgical implant removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore the clinical and molecular characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of early-onset autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV) in Chinese patients. A retrospective, interventional case series was assembled from three ADNIV patients. The three ADNIV cases harbored de novo CAPN5 mutations (p.Arg289Trp and p.Leu73Val). The ages of onset ranged from 11 months to 2 years. All the cases presented with vitreous opacity and subretinal inflammatory exudations. During the postoperative follow-up, all the patients manifested with exaggerated postoperative inflammatory responses. An intravitreal Ozurdex injection could not effectively control ocular inflammation in ADNIV. Laser spots after panretinal photocoagulation were partly visible. Two de novo CAPN5 mutations (p.Leu73Val and p.Arg289Trp) could cause early-onset ADNIV. Panretinal photocoagulation during vitrectomy and an intravitreal Ozurdex injection could not significantly stop the progression of subretinal exudations and ocular inflammation in early-onset ADNIV patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aim to contribute to the literature in terms of treatment safety with our real world data by examining the anterior segment complications and follow-up results of patients who underwent dexamethasone implants in our clinic. Methods: The records of patients treated with at least one intravitreal dexamethasone implant for various retinal diseases: diabetic macular edema (265 eyes), central retinal vein occlusion (45 eyes), retinal vein branch occlusion (91 eyes), postoperative cystoid macular edema (18 eyes), non-infectious uveitis (37 eyes) and other (14 eyes) between July 2013 and April 2020 were reviewed. Results: After 925 injections were applied to 470 eyes of a total of 383 patients, the eyes were controlled during a mean follow-up of 24 months. No complications were detected in 328 eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) above 25 mmHg was detected in 97 eyes (20.6%) that had no previous history of ocular hypertension. Of these 97 eyes, 71 (73.1%) eyes with increased IOP were treated with topical monotherapy, 26 (26.8%) eyes were treated with topical combined therapy and 1 (1.03%) patient had glaucoma surgery. Cataracts requiring surgical intervention developed in 55 (%21.73) of 253 phakic eyes. Three patients have anterior chamber dislocation of dexamethasone, 1 patient was hospitalized with sterile endophthalmitis on the 7th day after the injection, and pars plana vitrectomy was performed. Conclusion: This study is the first long-term follow-up study in our country evaluating the safety of dexamethasone implant injections in various retinal diseases and presenting the first real world data. Cataract progression and increased IOP were found to be the most common side effects. We observed that the patient's diagnosis did not cause a statistically significant change in the observation of side effects. As a result of our findings, close follow-up of IOP after the injection of dexamethasone implants would be appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the single-dose effect of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant for patients with post-vitrectomy macular edema (ME) under silicone oil (SO) tamponade. Twelve eyes diagnosed with ME after undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with SO injections were retrospectively reviewed. Each eye received a single intravitreal DEX implant (0.7-mg, Ozurdex; Allergan Inc) injection as treatment for recalcitrant ME. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. Compared with baseline (1.24 ± 0.34), the mean LogMAR BCVA improved at 1 (1.14 ± 0.27), 3 (1.13 ± 0.22), and 6 (1.22 ± 0.30) months without statistical significance. Maximal CMT resolution was observed at 1 month after intravitreal injection. The CMT value improved significantly at 1 (P =.008), 3 (P =.006), and 6 (P =.009) months. IOP did not show significant elevation during follow-up. No serious adverse events were observed. Single-dose treatment of DEX implant may have benefit for recalcitrant post-vitrectomy ME under SO tamponade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To study the long-term efficacy and safety of Ozurdex as anti-inflammatory monotherapy in the management of tuberculosis-associated intermediate uveitis (TBIU). Retrospective analysis of eyes with TBIU that received Ozurdex as anti-inflammatory monotherapy with a follow-up of at least 1 year. 13 eyes (2 pseudophakic) of 11 patients were included. Mean BCVA improved from 0.65 to 0.11 at 3 months (p =.0005) and remained 0.11 at 1 year. Mean central foveal thickness improved from 452.87µ to 187.25µ at 3 months (p =.0009) and 184.62µ at 1 year in 8 eyes with CME. Mean vitreous haze improved from 2.38 to 0.11 at 3 months with no recurrences at 1 year. Mean IOP increased from 13.15mmHg to 15.53mmHg (p =.013) at 2 months and reduced to 12.46mmHg by 1 year. None required antiglaucoma medication. One eye underwent cataract surgery. The mean follow-up was 18.4 months. Ozurdex is safe and efficacious in TBIU as anti-inflammatory monotherapy in conjunction with antitubercular therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of the dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant for the regression of macular edema and the improvement of bestcorrected visual acuity (BCVA) after the removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited 81 patients with idiopathic ERM. These patients all underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy combined with ERM and internal limiting membrane peeling surgery. Among them, 41 eyes in the DEX group received additional DEX implants and 40 in the non-DEX group did not. Outcomes including central retinal thickness (CRT), BCVA, and intraocular pressure were measured 1 and 3 months after surgery. Results: The DEX group had thinner CRTs compared to the non-DEX group at 1 month postoperatively (p <0.05), but did not differ significantly at the 1-week and 3-month follow-up visits (p = 0.109 and p = 0.417, respectively). There were no statistical differences with respect to BCVA (p = 0.499, 0.309, 0.246, and 0.517, respectively) and intraocular pressure (p = 0.556, 0.639, 0.741, and 0.517, respectively) between the two groups at each point of follow-up visits. Conclusion: DEX accelerated the reduction of CRT at 1 month after surgery. However, no evidence of further anatomical (CRT) or functional (BCVA) benefits using DEX was observed at 3 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan, Inc., CA, USA) has been proved to be effective in a variety of clinical settings including cases of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Uncommonly, this implant can migrate from the vitreous cavity and into the anterior chamber, especially in vitrectomized eyes with lens capsule defects. We report herein a rare case of anterior chamber migration and illustrate the passageway of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant through a new type of scleral fixated lens, the Carlevale IOL (Soleko-Italy). A 78-year-old woman was left aphakic following a complicated right eye hypermature cataract surgery with posterior capsule rupture and zonular dehiscence. Shortly thereafter, she underwent a planned combined pars plana vitrectomy with the placement of a Carlevale sutureless scleral fixated intraocular lens for the treatment of her aphakia. Due to a subsequent persistent cystoid macular edema that was unresponsive to topical treatment and sub-tenon corticosteroids, an intravitreal dexamethasone implant was injected. Eleven days after implantation, the patient presented with a floating implant in the anterior chamber and corneal edema. Following an immediate surgical removal, corneal edema resolved and visual acuity improved. One year later, results remain stable without macular edema recurrence. Anterior chamber migration of the Ozurdex implant is a potential complication in vitrectomized eyes, even when new types which are larger and specially designed for scleral fixation intraocular lenses are utilized. Corneal complications can be reversible following an immediate removal of the implant.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of intravitreal slow-release dexamethasone on traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and Müller cell gliosis and preliminarily explored the possible inflammatory mechanism in a rabbit model induced by penetrating ocular trauma. METHODS: Traumatic PVR was induced in the right eyes of pigmented rabbits by performing an 8-mm circumferential scleral incision placed 2.5 mm behind the limbus, followed by treatment with a slow-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) or sham injection. Left eyes were used as normal controls. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was monitored using an iCare tonometer. PVR severity was evaluated via anatomical and histopathological examinations every week for 6wk; specific inflammatory cytokine and proliferative marker levels were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, protein chip analysis, or immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: During the observation period, PVR severity gradually increased. Intense Müller cell gliosis was observed in the peripheral retina near the wound and in the whole retina of PVR group. Ozurdex significantly alleviated PVR development and Müller cell gliosis. Post-traumatic inflammation fluctuated and was persistent. The interleukin-1β (IL-1β) mRNA level was significantly upregulated, peaking on day 3 and increasing again on day 21 after injury. The expression of nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) showed a similar trend that began earlier than that of IL-1β expression. Ozurdex suppressed the expression of IL-1β, NLRP3, and phosphorylated nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB). The average IOP after treatment was within normal limits. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates chronic and fluctuating inflammation in a traumatic PVR rabbit model over 6wk. Ozurdex treatment significantly inhibites inflammatory cytokines expression and Müller cell gliosis, and thus alleviates PVR severity. This study highlights the important role of IL-1β, and Ozurdex inhibites inflammation presumably via the NF-κB/NLRP3/IL-1β inflammatory axis. In summary, Ozurdex provides a potential therapeutic option for traumatic PVR.

Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate choroidal structural changes after intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Methods: Twenty-three eyes of 14 patients with DME refractory to anti-VEGF therapy were included in this retrospective study. Detailed ophthalmological examinations were recorded, and optical coherence tomography images were obtained before and 3 months after IDI. Choroidal images were binarized into the luminal area and total choroidal area. Subfoveal choroidal thickness and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were calculated. Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were improved significantly (from 0.94 to 0.81 LogMAR, p=0.02, and from 464 to 371 µ, p=0.01, respectively) after IDI. There were no significant changes in both SCFT and CVI at the end of the follow-up period (from 446.3 to 428.8 µ, p=0.51 and from 63.1 to 63.7 p=0.35, respectively). Conclusion: IDI in eyes with DME refractory to anti-VEGF therapy improves BCVA and CMT but has no significant effect on SCFT and CVI in the short term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Ozurdex is an FDA–approved sustained-release, biodegradable implant formulated to deliver the corticosteroid dexamethasone to the posterior segment of the eye for up to 6 months. Hot-melt extrusion is used to prepare the 0.46 mm × 6 mm, rod-shaped implant by embedding the drug in a matrix of poly(lactic- co -glycolic acid) (PLGA) in a 60:40 drug:polymer ratio by weight. In our previous work, the Ozurdex implant was carefully studied and reverse engineered to produce a compositionally and structurally equivalent implant for further analysis. In this work, the reverse-engineered implant was thoroughly characterized throughout the in vitro dissolution process to elucidate the mechanisms of controlled drug release. The implant exhibited a triphasic release profile in 37 °C normal saline with a small burst release (1–2 %), a one-week lag phase with limited release (less than 10 %), and a final phase where the remainder of the dose was released over 3–4 weeks. The limited intermolecular interaction between dexamethasone and PLGA rendered the breakdown of the polymer the dominating mechanism of controlled release. A close relationship between drug release and total implant mass loss was observed. Unique chemical and structural differences were seen between the core of the implant and the implant surface driven by diffusional limitations, autocatalytic hydrolysis, and osmotic effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Branch retinal vein occlusions are a significant cause of vision loss and present several ophthalmic and systemic risk factors, including age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and glaucoma. Retinal vein occlusion is the second-most-common retinal vascular disease. This study evaluated the effects of Ozurdex in contrast to a combination therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cortisone in treatment-naive branch retinal vein occlusions-macular edema (BRVO-ME) cases, at 4-month and 6-month follow-ups. Thirty eyes were included in the study, which were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 15 eyes, and each received 1 injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex (DEX). The second group of 15 eyes received 3 intravitreal injections, the first and second with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor aflibercept and the third one with 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (Vitreal S), spaced at one month. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) results suggested that the peak efficacy was at 4 months for both groups, with mean values of 0.5 LogMAR and 0.4 LogMAR. Regarding macular edema, there were no significant changes between the 4- and 6-month follow-up periods, with mean values of 361 μm and 390 μm. Six patients experienced transient raised intraocular pressure at one week after treatment. This study highlights the benefits to visual acuity of the combination of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and cortisone, which represents a viable solution with similar results to Ozurdex therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. To evaluate modern methods of the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Material and methods. When writing a literature review, data was searched on the PubMed and Scopus platforms for the period up to 2021 inclusive. The search was carried out using the following keywords: diabetic macular edema, Ozurdex, dexamethasone implant, anti-VEGF, meta-analysis. A total of 33 articles were selected that are relevant to the topic of this literature review. Results. DME is one of the most common causes of vision loss in the world, especially in patients of working age. However, the choice of the treatment for DME is still controversial among vitreoretinal specialists. The pathophysiological process of DME development includes several mechanisms associated with chronic hyperglycemia. It has been proven that the level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the eye is not only elevated in DME, but is also proportional to the severity of edema. The use of anti-VEGF drugs for intravitreal administration for the treatment of DME has improved the prognosis of visual functions. The efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF drugs has been confirmed in many clinical studies. However, more and more data appear in the literature on the fairly common resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. Based on the foregoing, the experts concluded that it is necessary to revise the DME treatment strategy and conduct additional studies in order to identify other approaches in therapy to improve visual acuity. In patients with diabetes mellitus, high concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines were found. Corticosteroids have an anti-inflammatory effect, including reducing the permeability of the vascular walls, thereby giving an angiostatic effect in the treatment of DME. Thus, the dexamethasone implant may be a better alternative in the treatment of DME. Conclusion. Based on these studies, it can be concluded that the use of Ozurdex in the treatment of DME can be used both as the main treatment for DME and as an alternative treatment for patients who «poorly respond» to multiple injections of anti-VEGF drugs or in cases of resistance. Dexamethasone has the highest clinical efficacy among all corticosteroids used in ophthalmic practice, the drug demonstrates its multifaceted effects due to its influence on various links in the pathogenesis of DME. Dexamethasone implant reduces the concentration of both inflammatory cytokines in the eye and VEGF.

Kamal Kishore,1,2 Pooja V Bhat,3 Pradeep Venkatesh,4 Cecilia C Canizela2 1Illinois Retina and Eye Associates, Peoria, IL, USA; 2Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, IndiaCorrespondence: Kamal Kishore, Illinois Retina and Eye Associates, 4505 N Rockwood Drive, Suite 1, Peoria, IL, 61615, USA, Tel +1 3095891880, Fax +1 3095891885, Email Kamal.kishore1963@gmail.comPurpose: The purpose of this review article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current applications of intravitreal DEX implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) for a variety of ophthalmic conditions – ranging from FDA approved indications to off-label uses. We have attempted to provide relevant evidence from the literature to help a reader develop an understanding of the biological and pharmacokinetic properties of DEX implant, its uses, and potential side effects.Methods: PubMed searches were performed using the terms “Ozurdex”, or “intravitreal DEX implant”, AND “retinal vein occlusion”, or “diabetic macular edema”, or “uveitis”. The search was performed in July of 2021, with an additional search in October 2021. All original English language articles were considered for this review.Results: DEX implant has evidence of efficacy in a variety of clinical situations including macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion, diabetes, uveitis, and others. Safety concerns include cataract formation and progression, intraocular pressure elevation, complications related to intravitreal injection, and opportunistic infections secondary to steroid-induced immune suppression.Conclusion: DEX implant is a useful tool in the management of several retinal disorders. Further studies are needed for head-to-head comparison with other treatment modalities and to determine its precise place in clinical practice.Keywords: Ozurdex, intravitreal DEX implant, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema, uveitis, uveitic macular edema

PurposeThis article aims to report a case of successful treatment of peripheral granulomatous ocular toxocariasis (OT) in an 8-year-old patient using intravitreal injection of dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex) under ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) guidance.Case presentationA previously healthy 8-year-old boy with a history of long-term close contact with dogs complained of blurring of vision in the right eye for a year. Ophthalmic examination of his right eye showed chronic uveitis. Notably, UBM examination identified granulomas and peripheral vitreous strand in the ciliary body from 3 to 8 o'clock positions. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results of the intraocular fluid (IF) and serum showed increased anti-Toxocara immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, leading to a diagnosis of peripheral granulomatous OT in the right eye. Intraocular surgery was not indicated in this case. The treatment goal was to alleviate uveitis, improve visual acuity, and prevent complications. He was treated with an intravitreal injection of DEX implant, administered as a single dose every three months, total two doses, combined with albendazole, an oral anthelmintic. Under preoperative UBM guidance, two injections were performed at the 12 and 10 o'clock positions in the pars plana where there were no granulomas and peripheral vitreous strand, successfully preventing complications associated with intravitreal injection. After two injections, the patient's right eye vision improved significantly, with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) increasing from 20/400 to 20/50. Vitreous opacity and retinal edema were reduced, preretinal proliferative membrane was stabilized, and no adverse events occurred.ConclusionUBM can accurately determine the location and extent of peripheral granulomas in OT patients, facilitating the avoidance of granulomas during intravitreal injection and preventing complications associated with intravitreal injection. Under the close follow-up and strict adherence to indications, preoperative UBM-guided intravitreal injections of DEX implant treatment for pediatric peripheral granulomatous OT are safe and effective, providing a new therapeutic option for pediatric peripheral granulomatous OT.

This study intended to illustrate a rare case of pyogenic granuloma (PG) in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patient after dexamethasone (DEX) implant therapy. A 58-year-old female who underwent DEX implant therapy a month ago due to RVO presented with a mass in her right eye. Anterior segment analysis revealed a slowly enlarging, round, fleshy vascular mass indicating PG located at the injection site. Although surgical excision was planned, because of the Covid-19 pandemic, a patient could not come for surgery. Ocular examination revealed a spontaneous PG disappearance three months later. A small mass could, however, be detected using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography. While superficial PG regression can only be observed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, extensive root ingrowth can be clearly differentiated by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Besides, depending on the nature, size, location, and associated symptoms, some PG may be left to regress but with close monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the 1‐year costs associated with treating diabetic macular oedema (DME) patients using current intravitreal anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) biologics compared with the dexamethasone implant. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cost‐evaluation analysis using data from Oslo University Hospital and literature to compare three different intravitreal drugs for DME: bevacizumab, aflibercept and dexamethasone. Stratification of patients into 'Naive' or 'Switch' group was based on treatment history. We estimated the costs from healthcare and 'extended' healthcare perspectives. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the impact of various parameters. Results: The average injections per patient per year for the Naive group (bevacizumab), Switch group (aflibercept) and dexamethasone were 9.5, 9.1 and 3.0 respectively. From a healthcare perspective, the 1‐year costs for the Naive group were 15% lower (bevacizumab, €3619), and for the Switch group, 23% higher (aflibercept, €5226) compared with dexamethasone (€4252). The 'extended' healthcare perspective showed the cost per patient per year for bevacizumab remained nominally lower in the Naive group, while dexamethasone remained lower for the Switch group (€5116 for dexamethasone, compared to €4987 for bevacizumab and €6537 for aflibercept). Conclusions: From a primary healthcare perspective, the dexamethasone as a first‐line DME treatment may increase economic costs in settings where bevacizumab is used off‐label. Treating resistant DMEwith dexamethasone may reduce the costs and treatment burden compared with switching to aflibercept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Ozurdex® (DEX) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-world clinical practice, and to determine the correlation between known OCT biomarkers and the effect of treatment., Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (16 women, 17 men) treated with DEX at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc for DME indication between 2020 and 2023. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after the first DEX application. The main assessed parameters were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT), OCT biomarkers. The results were subsequently statistically evaluated., Results: At the first follow-up after DEX application, there was an average decrease in CRT of 186 ±146µm and a gain of 3 ±7 letters. Positive morphological and functional responses were observed in 39 eyes (92.9%) and 23 eyes (54.8%) respectively. The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) biomarker was initially present in 41 eyes (97.6%), with reduction or disappearance observed in 13 eyes (31%) post-application. Eyes with ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) had an average initial BCVA of 49.6 letters, compared to 57.8 letters in the group without this biomarker. The mean gain in BCVA was +8.7 letters in treatment-naive eyes and +2.1 letters in previously treated eyes. Chronic DME was less frequent in treatment-naive (n = 1, 14.3%) compared to previously treated eyes (n = 28, 84.8%). All these results were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). An increase in IOP post-DEX application occurred in 9 patients (21.4%)., Conclusion: Our results confirm DEX as a safe and effective treatment option for DME. Treatment-naive patients achieved better functional outcomes. We confirmed ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) as a negative biomarker. Additionally, we demonstrated the capacity of DEX to reduce disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL).

Introduction: Retinal vein obstruction is one of the leading causes of severe vision impairment and blindness with treatment options mainly including laser, vascular endothelial growth factors, and steroids. This study investigates an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (ozurdex), its efficacy, and complications in patients of retinal venous occlusion. Methods: A prospective, interventional study involving 30 patients with retinal venous occlusion. Patients diagnosed with RVO who had vision loss of at least two lines on Snellen's chart and increased central macular thickness (CMT) on OCT were included in the study. All the parameters such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CMT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were noted at baseline for the affected eye. The patients were followed up at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months following the implant. Result: Baseline parameters were comparable between the groups. Eyes receiving the implant had a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) in BCVA on the Snellen chart over the 3 months. There was also a constant decrease in macular edema and the mean difference value of CMT between baseline and 1 month, 2 months, and 3months were also found to be statistically significant. Also, a comparison of IOP between two-time points was done, between baseline and 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and the mean difference value in IOP was also found to be significant but clinically well within the normal physiological range. Conclusion: The study concluded that an intravitreal dexamethasone implant is an effective treatment for retinal venous occlusion, and it has a statistically significant and clinically meaningful effect on BCVA and CMT. However, it may be associated with a significant rise in IOP but it is well within the physiological range.

To report a case of unilateral central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and macular edema presumably associated with lupus anticoagulant (LA) induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2). Case report. A 32-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with a 5-day history of blurry vision. He was diagnosed with a CRVO and macular edema. The only pathological finding was positive LA which could have been induced by his recent confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection. The patient's evolution was satisfactory after two injections of Intravitreal dexamethasone (Ozurdex®), with improvement in macular edema and visual acuity. COVID-19 may be associated to retinal vascular occlusive disorders. Transient virus-induced LA might play a role in the pathogenesis of the thrombotic event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To verify the correct decision-making procedure on performing an intravitreal injection by investigating the in vivo wound morphology and evolution of 22-gauge wounds after dexamethasone oblique injection with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Prospective, observational consecutive case series. Methods: Subjects underwent a dexamethasone injection at University Eye Clinic of Turin. All the injections have been performed in an oblique (aka beveled or angled) fashion. Patients were divided according to the number of injections already performed with dexamethasone. Group 1 consisted of patients at the first injection, group 2 of patients at a second or more injection always in the same quadrant, and group 3 of patients at the second or more injection in a different quadrant. The incisions were imaged with the Heidelberg SPECTRALIS OCT device on postoperative days 1, 8, and 15. The main outcome measure was wound structure/characteristics (e.g., presence of gaping) as evaluated with OCT. Surgical and ocular parameters were also recorded. Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients were investigated. OCT demonstrated closed wounds in all eyes on postoperative days 1, 8, and 15. In all patients, the external (entry) side of the incision was seen as a gape; however, the rest of the wound was closed. No complications were recorded in the different patients during the follow-up. In patients of group 1, we identified the scleral pathway in 10 eyes at day 1. At 8 days in 9 of 10 eyes, the sclera had returned to its restitutio ad integrum. In patients of group 2, the scleral pathway was recognizable on the first day of control; in 7 patients, this was accompanied by the presence of intrascleral edema with peri-wound fluid. At the 8-day checkup, 3 eyes still showed signs attributable to the intrascleral pathway accompanied by peri-wound edema. In group 3, it was possible to identify the intrascleral pathway in 8 patients. There were no signs of intrascleral peri-wound edema or other anatomical changes in 9 patients as early as the first day. In the 8-day follow-up, the signs of scleral edema were absent in the single patient who presented them. At 15 days, there were no signs of scleral pathway in all eyes analyzed. Conclusions: Speaking of intravitreal injections of slow-release dexamethasone, the technique that involves moving the conjunctiva and a beveled or angled sclerotomy after a careful choice of the injection site, paying attention to vary the quadrant involved with each puncture, reduces the number of days of closure of the sclera via and the scleral damage, thus protecting the patient from complications. For the future, it is hoped that the operating microscope and intraoperative OCT will be used on every occasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patricia Udaondo,1,2 Ana Hervas-Ontiveros,1,2 Amir Rosemblatt,3,4 Salvador Garcia-Delpech1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; 2Aiken Prevencción y Cirugía Ocular, Valencia, Spain; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, IsraelCorrespondence: Patricia UdaondoAiken Prevención y Cirugía Ocular, Pizarro, 15 Bajo, Valencia, 46004, SpainTel +34 647869228Email patyudaondo@hotmail.comPurpose: To determine the impact of different baseline clinical characteristics on the improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) Ozurdex®.Methods: This was a single center retrospective study conducted on patients with DME, either naïve or previously treated, who were treated with one or more DEX and had a follow-up of at least 6 months. The main outcome measure was the proportion of DEX achieving an improvement ≥ 15 letters in BCVA.Results: The study analyzed 192 DEX implants administered to 97 eyes (65 patients). Among the 192 DEX analyzed, 57 (29.7%) implants achieved a BCVA improvement ≥ 15 letters (ETDRS) from baseline, with a mean time for achieving such improvement of 89.2 (39.7) days. Eyes who received an additional DEX and those with a duration of DME < 6 months had a greater probability of achieving a BCVA improvement ≥ 15 letters (odds-ratio: 2.55, p = 0.0028 and odds-ratio: 1.93, p = 0.0434). The mean (standard deviation) change in BCVA from baseline was 7.5 (14.5) letters, p < 0.0001. The mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline was − 128.0 (151.0) μm, p < 0.0001. The mean number of DEX implanted was 1.9 (0.8). Four (2.1%) DEX experienced an intraocular pressure increased ≥ 10 mm Hg; all the cases were successfully managed with topical antiglaucoma medication.Conclusion: The results of this study confirmed previous evidence suggesting that DEX is effective for improving BCVA and CMT in patients with DME.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, dexamethasone intravitreal implant, Ozurdex, best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness

Purpose: To evaluate the mid-term safety and effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-i) for treating unresponsive to medical therapy cystoid macular edema (CME) in vitrectomized eyes for endophthalmitis. Methods: Retrospective and interventional case series study conducted on vitrectomized eyes for endophthalmitis that developed a CME that did not adequately respond to medical therapy, who underwent 0.7-mg DEX-i. Main outcome measures were changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: Eleven eyes were included in the study. Microbiological findings of vitreous biopsies were 7 (63.6%) staphylococcus epidermidis; 3 (27.3%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and 1 (9.1%) Propionibacterium acnes. Median (interquartile range, IqR) duration of CME was 4.0 (3.0–4.0) months. Median (IqR) time between vitrectomy and DEX-i was 9.0 (9.0–11.0) months. Median CRT was significantly decreased from 548.0 (412.8–572.5) µm at baseline to 308.0 (281.3–365.5) µm at month 6 (p = 0.0009, Friedman test). Median BCVA significantly improved from 38.0 (30.5–44.8) letters at baseline to 50.0 (46.8–53.0) letters at month 6 (p < 0.0001, Friedman), with 9 (81.8%) eyes gaining ≥ 10 letters. Elevation of intraocular pressure was observed in one (9.1%) eye, which was successfully controlled with medical therapy. No recurrence of endophthalmitis or other complications was observed. Eight (72.7%) eyes required an additional DEX-i, while 3 (27.3%) were successfully controlled with only one DEX-i. CME recurrence occurred in 5 (62.5%) Gram-positive and 3 (100.0%) Gram-negative bacteria (p = 0.2357). Conclusion: In vitrectomized eyes for endophthalmitis affected by CME unresponsive to medical therapy, DEX-i had an acceptable safety profile and achieved favorable outcomes. The possibility of suppressing mechanisms for infection control should be taken into account, although correct management of endophthalmitis and long time without reactivation before DEX-i reduce the risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy is a disorder of unknown etiology characterized by dysfunction of the photoreceptor outer segments. Different treatment modalities have been tried with inconsistent results. This observational study reports the successful use of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant to halt progression of the disease. Purpose: To report the use of the dexamethasone (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc) intravitreal implant in the management of acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. Methods: Observational case report. Results: A 63-year-old woman presented with a 10-year history of progressing bilateral, although asymmetric, visual impairment and scotomata with clinical and imaging findings compatible with acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. The right eye had recently progressed rapidly until macular involvement occurred with loss of visual acuity. Under our observation, progression toward the fovea in the left eye occurred, Ozurdex intravitreal implant treatment was offered and administered. Autofluorescence imaging documented resolution of the hyperautofluorescent borders and slight regression of the involved retina. An injection was repeated every 6 months for 3 injections, and after a follow-up period, 20 months after the first and 8 months after the last injection, no further signs of progression were observed in her left eye. Conclusion: The dexamethasone implant effectively achieved regression of active disease in a patient with longstanding, progressive acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A patient with bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation is treated with intravitreal steroid implants, resulting in improvement of visual acuity, macular edema, and choroidal thickening. Background/Purpose: To report a case of bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) treated with intravitreal steroid implants. Method: Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation was diagnosed and treated with intravitreal steroid implants (both dexamethasone 0.7 mg [intravitreal dexamethasone implants] and fluocinolone acetonide 0.18 mg [intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implants]) and monitored every 2 weeks to 4 weeks with optical coherence tomography. Results: Intravitreal dexamethasone implants improved visual acuity and central retinal thickness for 10 weeks, was best from 4 to 6 weeks, and recurred by 14 weeks after treatment. Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implants improved visual acuity and central retinal thickness for 20 weeks after treatment without edema recurrence. No retinal detachments were observed over 1 year of treatment. Conclusion: Intravitreal steroid implants resulted in visual acuity improvement and central retinal thickness reduction for up to 20 weeks and may protect against retinal detachments in patients with bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motasem Al-Latayfeh,1,2 Mohammad Abdel Rahman,2 Raed Shatnawi1,2 1Department of General and Special Surgery, School of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Prince Hamza Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Motasem Al-LatayfehThe Hashemite University, P.O. Box 150495, Zarqa, 13115, JordanTel +962797397711Email motasem974@gmail.comPurpose: To analyze the real-life clinical outcome of a single dexamethasone implant (DEX) injection in the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in a sample of the Jordanian population.Methods: An observational case study design that involved a retrospective chart review analysis in a tertiary hospital in Amman, Jordan. Patients who showed persistent DME after receiving at least six doses of anti-VEGF agents for DME treatment were included.Results: The study population consisted of 72 participants (29 females, 43 males) having an average age of 66 years. All patients had best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) less than 0.7 (6/9) and SD-OCT documented center-involved DME. The study results showed that the average baseline BCVA improved from 0.205± 0.1 before DEX injection to 0.358± 0.1 at 3 months post-injection (p< 0.0001). The central mean thickness (CMT) showed significant improvement also (539.347± 132.402 to 379.041± 99.430, p< 0.0001). There was a mean of 3 mmHg increase in intraocular pressure at 3 months post-injection (p< 0.0001), however, only 4% of patients required medical treatment. Other inflammatory biomarkers in OCT, such as intraretinal hyper-reflective dots (HRD), showed significant improvement also (23.67± 16 to 14.83± 13, p< 0.0001). No other significant safety concerns were noticed.Conclusion: A single DEX injection showed significant clinical and anatomical improvement in DME cases that are persistent after anti-VEGF treatment in our sample, with an excellent safety profile. In case of supply shortage of intravitreal injections, which occurs frequently at our center, a single DEX injection may be utilized as an effective DME therapy. Further research is mandated to identify clinical response in a larger sample and more frequent injections.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, dexamethasone, anti-VEGF, Ozurdex, Jordan

AIM: To analyze choroidal parameters in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal Ozurdex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty eyes of 14 patients were included in this prospective study. Optical coherence tomography images were obtained before and 8–10 weeks after intravitreal Ozurdex injection; binarized and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were calculated. RESULTS: Mean SFCT (treatment naïve; 242.22 ± 32.87 reduced to 218.10 ± 22.10, P = 0.158 and previously treated; 330.4 ± 56.72 reduced to 328.93 ± 50.55, P = 0.833) and mean CVI (treatment naïve; 0.64 ± 0.03 changed to 0.65 ± 0.04, P = 0.583 and previously treated; 0.65 ± 0.05 reduced to 0.64 ± 0.03, P = 0.208) showed no significant change. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal Ozurdex showed no significant effects on SFCT and CVI in eyes with DME over short term. Larger studies with longer follow-up may allow a better understanding.

The treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye has been revolutionized by the development of sustained-release corticosteroid implants over the past decade. Their use is now supported by healthcare systems that have licensed and commissioned them on the basis of the high-quality randomised controlled trials that formed part of their development and which have informed clinicians as to their benefits and risks. In particular, they have provided an alternative mode of treatment for patients who do not wish to be systemically immunosuppressed, or in whom such immunosuppression is less desirable, such as those with unilateral disease or those with concurrent illnesses such as diabetes mellitus, renal disease or osteoporosis that are negatively impacted by systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents. In this article, we review the evidence for the use of the major licensed corticosteroid implants and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]