Search

Zakon o partnerski zvezi (ZPZ) je s svojo uveljavitvijo prinesel dve novi obliki družinsko-pravne skupnosti, in sicer sklenjeno in nesklenjeno partnersko zvezo. Ta zakon sklenjeno partnersko zvezo glede pravnih posledic na vseh področjih, razen izrecno določenih izjem, izenačuje z zakonsko zvezo, nesklenjeno partnersko zvezo oziroma dejansko življenjsko skupnost istospolnih partnerjev pa s sklenjeno partnersko zvezo. Izenačitev nesklenjene partnerske zveze s sklenjeno partnersko zvezo velja samo na področju razmerja med partnerjema. Na ostalih področjih ima nesklenjena partnerska zveza enake pravne posledice kot zunajzakonska skupnost. Obstoj nesklenjene partnerske zveze je treba v vsakem konkretnem primeru posebej ugotavljati. Pravno priznavanje ''zgolj'' dejanske življenjske skupnosti je pomemben korak naprej od prejšnje zakonske ureditve, saj do zdaj slovenska zakonodaja ni poznala nobene podobne neregistrirane istospolne partnerske skupnosti in partnerjem ni priznavala nobenih pravic na njeni podlagi. Z novo zakonsko ureditvijo istospolna partnerja, ki živita v dejanski življenjski skupnosti, sedaj na mnogih področjih uživata več pravic in obveznosti, kot sta jih imela pred tem. Zelo pomembna določba ZPZ v zvezi z razmerjem istospolnih partnerjev do otrok, ki je še vedno izključujoča do istospolnih partnerjev, je določba, ki izrecno določa, da partnerja v sklenjeni partnerski zvezi in partnerja v nesklenjeni partnerski zvezi ne moreta skupaj posvojiti otroka ter da nista upravičena do postopkov oploditve z biomedicinsko pomočjo. Za popolno izenačitev istospolnih parov z raznospolnimi bi bilo treba zagotoviti enako obravnavo tudi na področju starševstva. The Civil Union Act (ZPZ) introduces two new forms of family law communities for same-sex couples: a formal civil union and a non-formal civil union. This law in all legal sphares, except of explicitly stipulated exceptions, equals a formal civil union to marriage and a non-formal civil union to a formal civil union. The equalization of a non-formal civil union to a formal civil union applies only to the sphare of the relationship between partners. In other sphares, a non-formal civil union has the same legal consequences as a cohabitation. The existence of a non-formal civil union must be proved in every single case. The legal recognition of an "only" life partnership is an important step forward from previous legal regulation, since until now, Slovenian legislation did not recognize any similar non-formal same-sex partnerships, and did not recognize any rights on this basis. With the new legislation now same-sex partners living in a life partnership in many legal areas enjoy more rights and obligations than they had before. The most important provision of ZPZ concerning the relationship of same-sex partners to the children, that still excludes same-sex partners, is the provision, which explicitly provides that partners of a formal civil union and partners of a non-formal civil union cannot jointly adopt children, and that they are not entitled to the procedures of assisted reproduction techniques. For equal treatment of same-sex couples the same rights as for heterosexual couples should be guaranteed also in the field of parenting.

Upravljanje s terjatvami je pomemben proces v vsakem podjetju, saj vpliva na likvidnost podjetja. Proces upravljanja s terjatvami je v vsakem podjetju zastavljen nekoliko drugače in je odvisen od značilnosti podjetja in okolja, v katerem to podjetje posluje. Zagotavljanje poplačila terjatev je zmeraj veljalo za občutljivo opravilo, pri katerem so potrebna posebna znanja za doseganje želenih rezultatov. V nalogi sem osvetlila postopek upravljanja s terjatvami v dveh podjetjih, ki poslujeta v enakem poslovnem okolju, vendar imata različen pristop k reševanju problema. Predstavljeni so finančni učinki postopkov upravljanja s terjatvami in njihove posledice na likvidnost obeh podjetij. Problem upravljanja s terjatvami vpliva na več področij poslovanja v podjetju, saj ima vpliv na odnose s kupci, posledično tudi na odnose z dobavitelji in druga področja poslovanja. Posledice postopka upravljanja s terjatvami so težje merljive kot učinki, ki jih ima na finančno sliko v podjetju. Management of claims operation is an important process in every company due to its influence on liquidity. Management of claims operations is differnet in every company and depends on characteristics of business environment in which that company operates. Ensuring of debt recovery has always been considered a very delicate task which requires special knowledgement for acheaving desired results. In the research a debt recovery process is compared in two companies that operate in the same bussiness environment, but have different aproach to solving the problem. Financial effects and the consequences of these processes on liquidity are shown for both comapanies. The problem of claims management opreation effects not only financial area, but several other business areas of a company. It has an impact on the relations with customers, consequently relations with suppliers and many other areas of which the effects are more difficult to measure.

S terminom financiranje z obveznostmi do dobaviteljev je obravnavana v magistrskem delu dinamika takšnega financiranja v Sloveniji in Veliki Britaniji v obdobju pred in med finančno krizo. Kadarkoli se plačilo ne opravi sočasno z dobavo blaga oz. opravljeno storitvijo dobavitelja, ta dobavitelj zagotavlja kupcu po definiciji posojilo. Takšen vir financiranja pomeni za podjetje cenejši in hitreje dostopen vir sredstev kot kakršnikoli drug zunanji vir financiranja. Namen magistrskega dela je bil potrditi ali zavrniti dve hipotezi. Kot prvo, da podjetja v času finančne krize hkrati podaljšujejo odlog plačila dobaviteljem in dajejo daljši odlog plačila svojim kupcem. Ter kot drugo, da podjetja, ki delujejo v panogah, ki so bolj podvržena finančni krizi, povečajo financiranje z obveznostmi do dobaviteljev bolj kot tista, ki delujejo v panogah, ki niso. Testiranje je bilo v obeh gospodarstvih opravljeno za panoge finančnega sektorja, gostinstva, kmetijstva, proizvodnje, trgovine in gradbeništva. Pri testiranju prve hipoteze smo agregatne računovodske izkaze posameznih panog v Sloveniji in Veliki Britaniji analizirali z metodo indeksov s stalno osnovo, verižnih indeksov, stopnjami rasti in statističnih koeficientov. Za vse panoge v Sloveniji smo prvo hipotezo dokazano zavrgli, kar pomeni, da podjetja v teh panogah niso hkrati podaljševala in dajala daljšega odloga plačila kupcem in dobaviteljev. Za panoge v Veliki Britaniji smo hipotezo ena zavrgli samo za panogi kmetijstva in finančnega sektorja, za vse preostale panoge pa smo dokazano hipotezo ena potrdili. Pri testiranju druge hipoteze smo dovzetnost posamezne panoge določili na osnovi kriterija upada števila zaposlenih in stopnje realne rasti posamezne panoge. Na osnovi izračuna vezanih in kvantilnih rangov smo določili mesto posamezne panoge glede na vzorec. Panoge, ki so se nahajale v zgornji polovici testiranega vzorca smo upoštevali kot bolj dovzetne. Pri testiranju druge hipoteze smo na ravni obeh gospodarstev, torej Slovenije in Velike Britanije uspeli potrditi drugo hipotezo. Kar pomeni, da so podjetja, ki delujejo v panogah, ki so bolj podvržene gospodarski krizi na območju Slovenije in Velike Britanije, povečale financiranje z obveznostmi do dobaviteljev. In this thesis the term financing with obligations to suppliers is discussed as dynamics of such financing in Slovenia and in the United Kingdom in the period before and during the financial crisis. Whenever the payment is not made concurrently with the supply of goods or services performed, the supplier by definition provides a loan to the buyer. This source of financing is cheaper for the company in provides accessibility of assets quicker than any other kind of external source of financing. The purpose of the master thesis was to confirm or reject two hypotheses. The first hypotheses was that companies during the financial crisis extend the deferral of payments and at the same time give longer delay payments to its customers. The second hypotheses was that the companies operating in sectors which are more prone to financial crisis, increase financing with obligations to suppliers more than those companies who operate in sectors that are not. Testing was made in both economies for the sectors of financial and insurance, agriculture, manufacturing, construction, Wholesale, accommodation and food service activities. Testing the first hypothesis, aggregate accounts of each tested sector in Slovenia and United Kingdom was analyzed by indices with fixed base, chain indexes, growth rates and statistical coefficients. For all sectors in Slovenia the first hypothesis was rejected, which means that the companies in these sectors didn’t at the same time lengthen the deferral of payments and gave longer delay payments to its customers. For the sectors in United Kingdom, the first hypothesis was rejected only in the sectors of agriculture and financial and insurance. For all other tested sector, the first hypothesis was confirmed. Testing the second hypothesis, the subjection to the financial crisis for each sector was analyzed based of the employment percentage drop in each sector and each sector growth rates. Based on the calculations of average in quartile ranks, the individual place in the sample for each sector was determined. Sector, positioned in upper half were considered as more subjected to financial crisis. Testing the second hypothesis on the level of both countries, we managed to confirm the hypothesis in Slovenia in United Kingdom, meaning that the companies, operating in sectors which are more subjected to financial crisis, increase financing with suppliers more than those sector who are subjected less.

Bajo la hipótesis de que todo juicio de atribución de responsabilidad supone la defraudación de una expectativa, en el texto se propone comprender a estas últimas como estándares que pueden ser adoptados por los miembros de una comunidad para la evaluación de determinados eventos y que les autorizan a buscar una explicación de los eventos que las defraudan. Después de exponer esa forma de comprender las expectativas, se analiza su relación con la responsabilidad considerando la hipótesis señalada. Por último, se explora la relación entre expectativas y responsabilidad como una alternativa a la idea común de que todo juicio de atribución de responsabilidad supone el quebrantamiento de una obligación, sea jurídica o moral, por parte de quien es responsable. Under the hypothesis that every attribution of responsibility rests on the fact that an expectation has been breached, the author proposes to understand expectations as standards adopted by a community to evaluate specific events and allow the members of the community to search for an explanation of the events which breach expectations. After presenting this way of understanding expectations, their relationship with responsibility is analyzed, having in mind the mentioned hypothesis. To finalize, the relationship between responsibility and expectations is explored as an alternative to the idea that every attribution of responsibility supposes the breach of an obligation, whether moral or legal, by who is held responsible. Pričakovanja in pripisovanje odgovornosti. Ob predpostavki, da vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti temelji na dejstvu, da je bilo prekršeno neko pričakovanje, avtor predlaga, da se pričakovanja razume kot družbeno sprejete standarde za ocenjevanje konkretnih dogodkov, ki omogočajo članom skupnosti iskanje razlage dogodkov, ki kršijo pričakovanja. Potem ko predstavi omenjeno razumevanje pričakovanj v luči zgornje predpostavke, avtor prouči, v kakšni zvezi so pričakovanja z odgovornostjo. Razpravo nato zaključi s predlogom, da zvezo med pričakovanji in odgovornostjo razumemo kot alternativo ideji, po kateri vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti predpostavlja kršitev neke moralne ali pravne obveznosti tistega, ki mu odgovornost pripisujemo.

Razmerje med učiteljem in njegovim delodajalcem prinaša eni in drugi pogodbeni stranki pravice in obveznosti, ki sta jih dolžni upoštevati in spoštovati in nastanejo s sklenitvijo pogodbe o zaposlitvi. V diplomskem delu se osredotočam na pravice in obveznosti učitelja kot strokovnega pedagoškega delavca razrednega pouka (poučuje od prvega do šestega razreda osnovne šole). V nalogi so obravnavane bistvene pravice in obveznosti učitelja, ki izhajajo iz veljavne slovenske zakonodaje. Pri tem obravnavam tako pravice in obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz delovnega razmerja, kot tudi pravice in obveznosti, ki so povezane z vzgojno-izobraževalnim procesom. Poleg splošne delovne zakonodaje in kolektivnih pogodb so upoštevani tudi predpisi, ki specifično urejajo izobraževanje in pravice ter obveznosti učiteljev. The relationship between a teacher and his or her employer brings rights and duties established by the contract of employment, and both contractual partners are bound to follow and respect them. In the diploma thesis, I focus on the rights and duties of a teacher as a professional pedagogical worker in primary education working with pupils between the first and sixth grade. I am trying to identify the teacher’s key rights and duties originating from the valid Slovenian legislation. I am also touch upon those rights and duties, which stem from the employment legal relationship as well as from the actual educational process. In addition to the general files, I use also other legal files regulating the area in a specific manner.

V današnjem času otrokom vse pogosteje zmanjkuje prostega časa za nemoteno igro in sprostitev. Želje in pričakovanja staršev po njegovi uspešnosti silijo otroka k organiziranim prostočasnim dejavnostim in drugim obveznostim. Starši to svojo vlogo dojemajo tako zavzeto, da se v popoldanskem času mnogokrat spremenijo v voznike, ki hitijo od ene dejavnosti do druge. Pretiravanje z obveznostmi po otrokovem bivanju v vrtcu/šoli posledično vpliva na količino in kakovost prostega časa ter na odnose v družini. V magistrski nalogi so navedene današnje obremenitve otrok, ki jim vzamejo čas za preprosto vsakodnevno dejavnost – igro. Namen magistrske naloge je predstaviti prosti čas otrok, poudariti pomen igre za otrokov razvoj, pomembne pravne vire in (pre)obremenjenost otrok. Moje zanimanje je bilo usmerjeno tudi k sprostitvenim dejavnostim. V raziskavi je bila uporabljena deskriptivna in kavzalno-neeksperimentalna metoda empiričnega pedagoškega raziskovanja. Podatki temeljijo na priložnostnem vzorcu 230 staršev, ki so izpolnjevali spletno anketo. Rezultati, pridobljeni s statistično obdelavo podatkov, so pokazali, da imajo otroci dovolj prostega časa. Še vedno pa veliko časa preživijo med gledanjem televizije. Na podlagi rezultatov smo ugotovili, da se večina otrok za organizirane prostočasne dejavnosti odloča sama, kar izključuje »ambiciozne« starše, ki silijo otroka k dejavnostim po svojih željah. In today's ever more hectic pace, children are increasingly running out of leisure time for undisturbed play and relaxation. The wishes and expectations of parents to have a child force children into organized leisure activities and other obligations. Parents take on this role to such an extent that during afternoons they turn into chauffeurs, who ferry their children from one after-school activity to another. Overdoing the responsibilities a child has after his or her stay in kindergarten/school consequently affects the quantity and quality of leisure time and also family relationships. This thesis enumerates today’s burdens on children, which take away from their time for the simple everyday activity of playing. The purpose of this master's thesis was to present the leisure time of children, stress the importance of play for children's development, to familiarize relevant legal resources and the overburdening children. My interest also focused on relaxation activities. The study used a descriptive and causal-nonexperimental method of empirical pedagogical research. The data are based on casual sample of 230 parents who filled out an online questionnaire. The results obtained with the statistical analysis showed that children have enough leisure time. However, many children still spend their leisure time watching television. Based on the results, we found that in most cases it is the children who choose to attend these activities, which excludes "ambitious" parents forcing their children into activities according to their own wishes.

Se fondant sur une analyse méta-éthique anti-cognitiviste et un concept anti-subjectiviste de « réalité », Hägerström contestait la prétention de la théorie juridique traditionnelle, particulièrement le positivisme juridique, à être une science du droit au motif que les entités auxquelles elle se réfère ne sont pas réelles. Olivecrona a su prolonger cette thèse tout en la nuançant. En adoptant un point de vue socio-psychologique, il a construit une théorie réaliste du droit susceptible, à la fois, de mettre en évidence les phénomènes psychiques et linguistiques qui sont au fondement de nos idées de droits et de devoirs, de déterminer les fonctions que ces idées exercent dans la société et d’identifier la façon dont elles influencent nos conduites. Based on a non-cognitivist meta-ethical position and an anti-subjectivist concept of “reality”, Hägerström questioned the pretension of traditional legal theory, especially legal positivism, to be a science of law, because the entities to which it refers are not real. Olivecrona succeeded in pursuing such a thesis while he tempered it. Taking a socio-psychological approach, he offered a realistic theory of law which is able to emphasize psychical and linguistic phenomena lying at the root of our ideas of rights and duties, which determine what functions they serve in society and how they affect our conduct. Pravo kot dejstvo. Na podlagi ne-kognitivističnega metaetiškega stališča in ne-subjektivističnega pojma »stvarnosti« je Hägerstöm pod vprašaj postavil trditev tradicionalne pravne teorije, posebno pravnega pozitivizma, da gre za znanost o pravu. Problematično naj bi bilo to, da entitete, na katere tradicionalna pravna teorija sklicuje, niso del stvarnosti. Olivecrona je uspel to tezo nadalje razviti, pri čemer pa jo je tudi omehčal. S tem ko je zavzel družbeno-psihološki pristop, je ponudil realistično teorijo prava, sposobno izpostaviti psihološke in jezikovne pojave, ki se nahajajo v jedru naših predstav o pravicah in dolžnostih, ki določajo čemu služijo v družbi in kako zadevajo naše obnašanje.

Based on a non-cognitivist meta-ethical position and an anti-subjectivist concept of “reality”, Hägerström questioned the pretension of traditional legal theory, especially legal positivism, to be a science of law, because the entities to which it refers are not real. Olivecrona succeeded in pursuing such a thesis while he tempered it. Taking a socio-psychological approach, he offered a realistic theory of law which is able to emphasize psychical and linguistic phenomena lying at the root of our ideas of rights and duties, which determine what functions they serve in society and how they affect our conduct. Pravo kot dejstvo. Na podlagi ne-kognitivističnega metaetiškega stališča in ne-subjektivističnega pojma »stvarnosti« je Hägerstöm pod vprašaj postavil trditev tradicionalne pravne teorije, posebno pravnega pozitivizma, da gre za znanost o pravu. Problematično naj bi bilo to, da entitete, na katere tradicionalna pravna teorija sklicuje, niso del stvarnosti. Olivecrona je uspel to tezo nadalje razviti, pri čemer pa jo je tudi omehčal. S tem ko je zavzel družbeno-psihološki pristop, je ponudil realistično teorijo prava, sposobno izpostaviti psihološke in jezikovne pojave, ki se nahajajo v jedru naših predstav o pravicah in dolžnostih, ki določajo čemu služijo v družbi in kako zadevajo naše obnašanje.