Search

Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary collapse is a catastrophic event in cesarean section, which leads to adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Pulmonary embolism is one of the rare etiologies of this entity. We herein reported the successful management of acute embolism pulmonary associated with cesarean delivery on a healthy pregnant woman at our tertiary referral hospital. Case presentation A full-term pregnant woman hospitalized for planned cesarean delivery due to placenta previa without cardiorespiratory diseases. She was scheduled uneventfully for a planned cesarean section. After placental delivery, the patient spontaneously fell into cardiopulmonary collapse and her vital signs deteriorated rapidly. The obstetricians promptly completed the cesarean section and performed all procedures to prevent the PPH and preserve the uterus. At the same time, the anesthesiologists continued to carry out advanced heart-lung resuscitation in order to control her vital signs. After surgery, the multidisciplinary team assessed the patient and found a thrombus in her pulmonary circulation. Therefore, the patient was managed with therapeutic anticoagulation. The patient recovered in good clinical condition and was discharged after 2 weeks without any complications. Conclusions The diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism is extremely difficult due to uncommon occurrence, sudden onset, and non-specific presentation. Awareness of this life-threatening pathology during cesarean delivery should be raised. Interdisciplinary assessment must be essentially established in this life-threatening condition. After the whole conventional management, uterine conservation may be acceptable where applicable. Further data is required to encourage this finding.

Abstract Objective An emergency cesarean section (CS), which is extremely life-threatening to the mother or fetus, seems to be performed within an adequate time horizon to avoid negative fetal-maternal denouement. An effective and vigilant technique for anesthesia remains vital for emergency cesarean delivery. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the impact of various anesthesia tactics on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Method This was a retrospective cohort study of parturient patients who were selected for emergency CS with the assistance of general or neuraxial anesthesia between January 2015 and July 2021 at our institution. The 5-min Apgar score was documented as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes, including the 1 min Apgar score, decision-to-delivery interval (DDI), onset of anesthesia to incision interval (OAII), decision to incision interval (DII), duration of operation, length of hospitalization, height and weight of the newborn, use of vasopressors, blood loss, neonatal resuscitation rate, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), duration of NICU and complications, were also measured. Results Of the 539 patients included in the analysis, 337 CSs were performed under general anesthesia (GA), 137 under epidural anesthesia (EA) and 65 under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). The Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min in newborns receiving GA were lower than those receiving intraspinal anesthesia, and no difference was found between those receiving EA and those receiving CSEA. The DDI of parturients under GA, EA, and CSE were 7[6,7], 6[6,7], and 14[11.5,20.5], respectively. The DDI and DII of GA and EA were shorter than those of CSE, and the DDI and DII were similar between GA and EA. Compared to that in the GA group, the OAII in the intraspinal anesthesia group was significantly greater. GA administration correlated with more frequent resuscitative interventions, increased admission rates to NICU, and a greater incidence of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). Nevertheless, the duration of NICU stay and the incidence rates of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and pneumonia did not significantly differ based on the type of anesthesia performed. Conclusion Compared with general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia may not be associated with a negative impact on neonatal or maternal outcomes and could be utilized as an alternative to general anesthesia in our selected patient population following emergency cesarean section; In addition, a comparably short DDI was achieved for emergency cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia when compared to general anesthesia in our study. However, the possibility that selection bias related to the retrospective study design may have influenced the results cannot be excluded.

Background: Remimazolam has recently been introduced as a maintenance agent for general anesthesia. However, the effect of remimazolam on peripartum prognosis has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol for uterotonic drugs following cesarean section. Methods: The electronic medical records of 51 adult women who underwent elective cesarean sections by single obstetrician under general anesthesia were collected. Participants were categorized into two groups: the propofol group and the remimazolam group. General anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of propofol or remimazolam after delivery. The number of uterotonic drugs administered during the cesarean section, the estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay (LOS) after delivery were assessed. Results: Of the 51 patients included in the study, 35 were in the propofol group and 16 in the remimazolam group. In the remimazolam group, five patients (31.3%, 5/16) received more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Conversely, in the propofol group, 19 patients (54.3%, 19/35) were injected with more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal positioning of the placenta (P = 0.079) and not using remimazolam (P = 0.100) were the most relevant factors associated with the increased use of uterotonics. There was no significant difference in EBL between the two groups. The use of remimazolam was clinically relevant with a shorter LOS (P = 0.059). Conclusions: The use of remimazolam as a maintenance agent did not result in significantly higher use of intrapartum uterotonics compared to the use of propofol. These results cannot exclude all adverse effects of remimazolam during cesarean delivery. Further randomized controlled trials must be conducted to obtain high-quality evidence.

Background Cesarean section is associated with moderate to severe pain and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly employed. The optimal NSAID, however, has not been elucidated. In this network meta-analysis and systematic review, we compared the influence of control and individual NSAIDs on the indices of analgesia, side effects, and quality of recovery. Methods CDSR, CINAHL, CRCT, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing a specific NSAID to either control or another NSAID in elective or emergency cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Network plots and league tables were constructed, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. Results We included 47 trials. Cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h, the primary outcome, was examined in 1,228 patients and 18 trials, and control was found to be inferior to diclofenac, indomethacin, ketorolac, and tenoxicam (very low quality evidence owing to serious limitations, imprecision, and publication bias). Indomethacin was superior to celecoxib for pain score at rest at 8–12 h and celecoxib + parecoxib, diclofenac, and ketorolac for pain score on movement at 48 h. In regard to the need for and time to rescue analgesia COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib were inferior to other NSAIDs. Conclusions Our review suggests the presence of minimal differences among the NSAIDs studied. Nonselective NSAIDs may be more effective than selective NSAIDs, and some NSAIDs such as indomethacin might be preferable to other NSAIDs.

Purpose Patient preferences for labor epidural analgesia (LEA) have been incompletely evaluated. This study aimed to determine the importance of various LEA outcomes to both antenatal and postpartum patients. Methods This was a cross-sectional study approved by the institutional ethics board. Questionnaires were distributed to two separate and distinct cohorts screened for eligibility: pregnant patients at an antenatal visit and postpartum patients during childbirth admission. A list of common LEA outcomes was compiled using research published in leading anesthesia journals. Participants ranked the outcomes according to perceived importance. They assigned each a number from 1 to 10 (priority ranking; 1 indicated the highest priority outcome and 10 the least). They were also asked to 'spend' $100 towards the outcomes (relative value scale), allocating more money to outcomes more important to them. Results Two hundred twenty questionnaires were completed (105 antenatal, 115 postpartum). 'Achieving desired pain relief' was the most important outcome for both cohorts. It was valued more by the postpartum cohort (Median $50 (25 - 60) vs $30 (18 - 50)). 'Overall satisfaction with the pain management,' 'experiencing a short time to achieve pain relief,' and 'experiencing a short duration of labor' received more money than avoiding various LEA-related side effects. The postpartum cohort ranked 'experiencing a short time to achieve pain relief' as more important than the antenatal cohort (Median 5 (3 - 7) vs 3 (2 - 5)). Conclusions Achieving the desired pain relief was the highest LEA outcome preference for both antenatal and postpartum patients. Avoiding side effects was less important relative to pain-related outcomes.

Objective:Postoperative peripheral trunk blocks are used for multimodal analgesia in caesarean sections. This trial was planned to compare the efficacy of transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.Method:In this prospective trial, ASA II-III risk group patients between the ages of 20-50 years who were scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were evaluated. Demographic data, duration of operation, presence of intraoperative and postoperative nausea & vomiting, pruritus, duration of first analgesia requirement, visual analogue scale (VAS) values for 24 hours postoperatively, paracetamol, diclofenac sodium, the total amount of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used were recorded.Results:Patients were randomized into two groups: TFPB (75, 50%) and TAPB (75, 50%) groups. There was no significant difference in demographic data, comorbidity, ASA classification and operation times between the two groups (p>0.05). When the duration of the first postoperative analgesia requirement was evaluated, it was higher in the TFPB group (p

Background: Cesarean section is associated with moderate to severe pain and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly employed. The optimal NSAID, however, has not been elucidated. In this network meta-analysis and systematic review, we compared the influence of control and individual NSAIDs on the indices of analgesia, side effects, and quality of recovery. Methods: CDSR, CINAHL, CRCT, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing a specific NSAID to either control or another NSAID in elective or emergency cesarean section under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Network plots and league tables were constructed, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. Results: We included 47 trials. Cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h, the primary outcome, was examined in 1,228 patients and 18 trials, and control was found to be inferior to diclofenac, indomethacin, ketorolac, and tenoxicam (very low quality evidence owing to serious limitations, imprecision, and publication bias). Indomethacin was superior to celecoxib for pain score at rest at 8-12 h and celecoxib 十 parecoxib, diclofenac, and ketorolac for pain score on movement at 48 h. In regard to the need for and time to rescue analgesia COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib were inferior to other NSAIDs. Conclusions: Our review suggests the presence of minimal differences among the NSAIDs studied. Nonselective NSAIDs may be more effective than selective NSAIDs, and some NSAIDs such as indomethacin might be preferable to other NSAIDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Bagcilar Medical Bulletin / Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We hypothesized that patients who underwent unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery and had removal of an indwelling epidural catheter followed by an attempt of a new regional anesthetic would be more likely to have regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication compared to patients who had activation of an epidural catheter. Patients who had an unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, who had an indwelling labor epidural catheter were included. Patients were propensity matched based on obstetric indication for cesarean delivery and number of physician-administered rescue analgesia boluses administered during labor. A multivariate proportional odds regression was performed. After adjusting for parity, depression, last neuraxial labor analgesic technique, physician-administered rescue analgesia boluses, and duration from neuraxial placement to entering the operating room for cesarean delivery, patients who had removal of their epidural catheters were more likely to have regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication (odds ratio 4.298; 95% confidence interval 2.448, 7.548; P < 0.01). Removal of epidural catheters was associated with a greater chance of avoiding conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since the onset of COVID-19, recommendations suggest the use of neuraxial anesthesia, over general anesthesia for cesarian section to avoid the risks of aerosolization associated with intubation and extubation. But the safety of performing spinal anesthesia is unclear especially for post spinal hypotension, during the presence of active COVID-19. According to a few studies there was a controversial discussion about the safety of regional anesthesia. In this study we aimed to compare the incidence of hypotension in COVID-19 pregnant patients between non-COVID 19 pregnant patients in the literature to see if the spinal anesthesia is safe or if it poses an additional risk. Materials and Methods: Medical records of COVID-19 pregnant women for cesarean section from the beginning ofthe pandemic up to December 2020 were retrospectively retrieved. All the demographic-vital data, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP-DBP), ephedrine-atropine doses, infusion volumes, and nausea and vomiting were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Spinal anesthesia induced hypotension was seen 54 of the patients (21,69%). And vasopressors (Ephedrine) were used to all hypotensive patients. Demographic data's, the amount of bupivacaine and crystalloid volume which used before the spinal anesthesia showed no differences between hypotensive and non-hypotensive patients. Conclusion: This is the first retrospective study which shows 249 COVID 19 patients' data in one center that no significant difference was seen in the incidence of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for COVID-19 cesarean section compared to non-COVID group in literature. We recommend using of regional anesthesia safelyfor patients and anesthesiologists during active COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The use of epidural analgesia represents the gold standard for pain management during labor, but the influence of the use of epidural analgesia on delivery mode is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the impact of epidural analgesia on the delivery mode, namely, cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates, in Robson class 1 women. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all Robson class 1 women who delivered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, in the University Hospital of Modena. The primary outcome was the delivery mode (cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates), and the secondary outcomes were maternal, anesthesiologic, and neonatal effects of epidural analgesia (duration of labor, duration of the second stage of labor, Apgar score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission). RESULTS: A total of 744 women were included in the final analysis, of which 198 (26.6%) underwent epidural analgesia on request and 546 (73.4%) did not. In women with and without epidural analgesia, the cesarean delivery rate was 8.1% vs 7%, the vaginal delivery rate was 79.3% vs 81.1%, and the operative vaginal delivery rate was 12.6% vs 11.9%, respectively. A significant increase in both the first stage of labor (66.3±38.5 vs 43.8±38.8 minutes; P4 cm). No significant difference in Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission was found. CONCLUSION: The use of epidural analgesia was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery in Robson class 1 women. Further investigations are needed to evaluate its impact on the duration of labor, namely the duration of the first stage of labor, and on the possible advantages of starting epidural analgesia at an early stage.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthésie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background In Japan, dilatation & curettage (D&C) has been performed under general anesthesia as a surgery for an early pregnancy miscarriage for a long time. In 2016, manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) under general anesthesia was introduced at our hospital and has been used as a surgical treatment for first-trimester pregnancy miscarriage, with its utility to date being reported here. In July 2018, our hospital introduced the MVA procedure under local anesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MVA under general and local anesthesia in first-trimester pregnancy miscarriage surgery in Japanese women. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 322 pregnant women at less than 12 weeks of gestation, who underwent MVA surgery under local anesthesia (n = 166) or conventional general anesthesia (n = 156). The duration of surgery, blood loss volume, quantity of anesthesia, presence or absence of retained products of conception, and clinical complications were evaluated. In addition, the intraoperative pain and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the local anesthesia group. No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of the blood loss volume and incidence of retained products of conception. In addition, no serious complications were observed in either group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in the VAS scores for pain and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions In this retrospective study, the use of MVA under local anesthesia for early pregnancy miscarriage surgery was found to be equally safe and effective when performed under conventional general anesthesia. This technique allowed the achievement of appropriate pain control with excellent patient satisfaction.

Background and objective: During the past few years, an increased number of postpartum hemorrhages have been noticed, even in high-income countries. It has been suggested that this escalation could be associated with increased obstetric interventions. Among such interventions, anesthesia is one of the most prevalent. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of peripartum anesthesia on total blood loss during the 24 hours after delivery. Methods: We performed a complementary analysis from a prospective cohort study that evaluated postpartum bleeding within 24 hours after birth. The study was performed between February 1st, 2015 and March 31st, 2016 at the Women’s Hospital at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil. Postpartum bleeding was measured using a calibrated drape and summing the blood contained in the compresses and pads used for 24 hours. We calculated means, percentages, and standard deviation and performed Mann-Whitney analysis for the relation of anesthesia with Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) and logistic regression for drugs used in the anesthesia with PPH, using SAS 9.4 software. Results: We included 270 women in the study; of these, 168 received anesthesia for delivery and almost 50% of them had spinal and epidural anesthesia. The mean blood loss within 24 hours after delivery did not show differences between those who did and those who did not receive obstetrical anesthesia (579.0 ± 361.6 vs. 556.6 ± 360.6; p = 0.57). Logistic regression showed that anesthesia, the type of anesthesia, and the drug used did not influence the PPH above 500 mL and above 1000 mL within 2 hours (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Anesthesia did not influence postpartum bleeding after vaginal delivery.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) of unknown etiology, more prevalent in obese women of childbearing age. The management of IIH during pregnancy represents a multidisciplinary challenge, as medical treatment is contentious due to the foetal teratogenic risk, and the technically challenging placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt is hindered by the presence of the pregnant uterus. The goal of anaesthetic management during childbirth is to maintain hemodynamic stability, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral tissue oxygenation, while avoiding abrupt fluctuations in intracranial pressure. The choice of anaesthetic technique is complex and depends on the assessment of risks and benefits associated with each technique, involving a decision between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia. We present the case of a pregnant woman with rapidly progressing IIH, approached in a multidisciplinary manner, whose anaesthetic management was technically challenging, resulting in a favourable outcome without subsequent complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: In Japan, dilatation & curettage (D&C) has been performed under general anesthesia as a surgery for an early pregnancy miscarriage for a long time. In 2016, manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) under general anesthesia was introduced at our hospital and has been used as a surgical treatment for first-trimester pregnancy miscarriage, with its utility to date being reported here. In July 2018, our hospital introduced the MVA procedure under local anesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MVA under general and local anesthesia in first-trimester pregnancy miscarriage surgery in Japanese women. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 322 pregnant women at less than 12 weeks of gestation, who underwent MVA surgery under local anesthesia (n = 166) or conventional general anesthesia (n = 156). The duration of surgery, blood loss volume, quantity of anesthesia, presence or absence of retained products of conception, and clinical complications were evaluated. In addition, the intraoperative pain and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the local anesthesia group. No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of the blood loss volume and incidence of retained products of conception. In addition, no serious complications were observed in either group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in the VAS scores for pain and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, the use of MVA under local anesthesia for early pregnancy miscarriage surgery was found to be equally safe and effective when performed under conventional general anesthesia. This technique allowed the achievement of appropriate pain control with excellent patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia is a frequent and important deleterious complication that requires treatment. Current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactically administered norepinephrine infusion protocol in preventing spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in elective cesarean deliveries performed in our institue between November 2017 and April 2018. Methods: Patients underwent cesarean section were evaluated retrospectively. They were divided into two groups as the norepinephrine group (n=32) and the control group (n=79), according to the treatment methods applied prophylactically to prevent spinal-induced hypotension. Patient demographics, 1st and 5th minutes APGAR scores, umbilical cord blood gas pH, newborn weight, overall amount of ephedrine used, adverse conditions such as maternal nausea and vomiting, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate were collected from the anesthesia records and medical electronic systems. Results: Total of 111 patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference between umbilical artery pH values. The first (7.01 vs 7.34) minute mean APGAR scores in control group were significantly lower (p=0.008). The incidence of hypotension before delivery was lower in the norepinephrine group (40.6%) compared to the control group (74.7%) (p<0.05). The mean total dose of ephedrine was greater in the control group (13.67 vs 6.09 mg, p<0.01). Conclusion: We believe that prophylactic norepinephrine infusion is effective in preventing spinal-induced hypotension for cesarean deliveries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the measurement of anterior neck soft tissue thickness and the difficult laryngoscopy in which cesarean section under general anesthesia. Our secondary aim is to determine the efficacy of the other predictive tests and post-induction indicators to detect difficult laryngoscopy in pregnant women. Materials and Methods: One hundred fiftytwo pregnant women (18-45 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II) were included. According to Cormack and Lehane’s scale (Grade I-II: easy laryngoscopy, Grade III-IV: difficult laryngoscopy) patients were divided into two groups. The distance from the skin to the anterior aspect of the trachea was measured at five different levels (hyoid bone, thyrohyoid membrane, vocal cords, thyroid isthmus, and suprasternal notch) with ultrasound. In addition, the other predictive tests and postinduction indicators for predetermining difficult laryngoscopy were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in the anterior neck soft tissue ultrasound measurements between the groups. Having limited mouth opening (4.80±0.51cm), buck teeth (20%), high Wilson's Risk Score (0.73±0.82), large neck circumference (41.40±2.96cm), inability to bite the upper lip (43%), and high Modified Mallampati Score (33%) were seen statistically significantly more common in the difficult laryngoscopy group. In addition, ‘‘Backward, Upward, Rightward Pressure’’ maneuver, use of gum elastic bougie, high Intubation Difficulty Score, and >2 intubation attempts were more frequently found in the difficult laryngoscopy group. Conclusion: Measuring the anterior neck soft tissue with ultrasound is ineffective for determining difficult laryngoscopy in pregnant women. On the other hand, Mallampati Score, upper lip bite test, mouth opening, neck circumference, buck teeth, and Wilson's Risk Score can be helpful in the determination of difficult laryngoscopy in pregnancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with placenta previa are at risk for intra- and postpartum massive blood loss as well as increased risk of placenta accreta, a type of abnormal placental implantation. This condition can lead to serious obstetric complications, including maternal mortality and morbidity. The risk factors for previa include prior cesarean section, multiparity, advanced maternal age, prior placenta previa history, prior uterine surgery, and smoking. The prevalence of previa parturients has increased due to the rising rates of cesarean section and advanced maternal age. For these reasons, we need to identify the risk factors for previa and identify adequate management strategies to respond to blood loss during surgery. This review evaluated the diagnosis of placenta previa and placenta accreta and assessed the risk factors for previa-associated bleeding prior to cesarean section. We then presented intraoperative anesthetic management and other interventions to control bleeding in patients with previa expected to experience massive hemorrhage and require transfusion.

Purpose The meta‐analysis is aimed to further access the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound‐guided transversus abdominis plane (USG‐TAP) block after cesarean section (CS). Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Primary objectives were pain‐related outcomes. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs), as well as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were used to calculate estimates. Subgroup analyses were done based on whether USG‐TAP blocks were performed with long‐acting intrathecal opioids (ITO). Results: A total of 17 studies were included. When compared with control groups (placebo or no blocks), USG‐TAP block resulted in lower cumulative opioid consumption at 6 h (WMD: −8.32; 95% CI: −14.86, −1.79), 12 h (WMD: −10.75; 95% CI: −20.93, −0.57), and 24 h (WMD: −12.71, 95% CI: −21.28, −4.14). No significant differences were demonstrated among dynamic or resting pain scores. Patients in USG‐TAP groups needed longer time to request first analgesic (WMD: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.43, 5.68) and showed a lower requirement of opioid rescue analgesia for breakthrough severe pain during 24 h (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.86). Subgroup analyses showed USG‐TAP blocks did not afford additional benefit in the presence of intrathecal morphine. Also, reduced need for antiemetics after CS and higher maternal satisfaction were provided by USG‐TAP blocks. Conclusion: USG‐TAP block can provide significantly effective analgesia for patients who underwent CS in the absence of long‐acting ITO and therefore are worth promoting in the setting of long‐acting ITO being unfeasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The trans-tracheal rapid insufflation of oxygen (TRIO) device is less commonly used and is an alternative to trans-tracheal jet ventilation for maintaining oxygenation in a “cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate” (CICO) scenario. Case We report the successful use of this device to maintain oxygenation after jet ventilator failure in a parturient who presented with the CICO scenario during the procedure for excision of laryngeal papilloma. Conclusions A stepwise approach to the airway plan and preparation for an event of failure is essential for good materno-fetal outcomes. The TRIO device may result in inadequate ventilation that can lead to hypercarbia and respiratory acidosis. Hence, it should only be used as a temporizing measure before a definitive airway can be secured.

Cardiac tamponade is the accumulation of fluid within the pericardial sac, which leads to an increase in intrapericardial pressure, allowing the deterioration of the heart's ability to fill and act as a pump. Among its causes are tuberculosis, collagen disease, and cancer. In pregnancy, the signs and symptoms of cardiac tamponade can be masked by the physiological changes of pregnancy. The gold standard of detection is echocardiography. Treatment of cardiac tamponade is pericardiocentesis or surgical. The case of a 26-yearold patient is presented with: a 32.6 for week pregnancy in preterm labor, cardiac tamponade and 2-hour post-pericardiocentesis, for culminate of pregnancy. Anesthetic management is complex for both the mother and the newborn, basing on maintaining hemodynamic stability and subsequent transfer to the intensive care unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Maternal early warning systems reduce maternal morbidity. We developed an electronic maternal surveillance system capable of visually summarizing the labor and delivery census and identifying changes in clinical status. Automatic page alerts to clinical providers, using an algorithm developed at our institution, were incorporated in an effort to improve early detection of maternal morbidity. We report the frequency of pages generated by the system. To our knowledge, this is the first time such a system has been used in peripartum care. Methods Alert criteria were developed after review of maternal early warning systems, including the Maternal Early Warning Criteria (MEWC). Careful consideration was given to the frequency of pages generated by the surveillance system. MEWC notification criteria were liberalized and a paging algorithm was created that triggered paging alerts to first responders (nurses) and then managing services due to the assumption that paging all clinicians for each vital sign triggering MEWC would generate an inordinate number of pages. For preliminary analysis, to determine the effect of our automated paging algorithm on alerting frequency, the paging frequency of this system was compared to the frequency of vital signs meeting the Maternal Early Warning Criteria (MEWC). This retrospective analysis was limited to a sample of 34 patient rooms uniquely capable of storing every vital sign reported by the bedside monitor. Results Over a 91-day period, from April 1 to July 1, 2017, surveillance was conducted from 64 monitored beds, and the obstetrics service received one automated page every 2.3 h. The most common triggers for alerts were for hypertension and tachycardia. For the subset of 34 patient rooms uniquely capable of real-time recording, one vital sign met the MEWC every 9.6 to 10.3 min. Anecdotally, the system was well-received. Conclusions This novel electronic maternal surveillance system is designed to reduce cognitive bias and improve timely clinical recognition of maternal deterioration. The automated paging algorithm developed for this software dramatically reduces paging frequency compared to paging for isolated vital sign abnormalities alone. Long-term, prospective studies will be required to determine its impact on patient outcomes.

Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide and the adoption of enhanced recovery programs for cesarean delivery is gaining popularity. We tested the hypothesis that implementation of an enhanced recovery program for cesarean delivery would be associated with a decrease in postoperative opioid consumption.Methods: We compared a retrospective cohort of women delivered by elective cesarean delivery (January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) to a prospective cohort exposed to the enhanced recovery protocol (July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018). The primary outcome was inpatient maternal opioid use, measured as total oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included postoperative 0-10 pain scores, length of stay, 30-day postoperative complication rates, and hospital re-admissions.Results: Data from 541 patients were analyzed. The enhanced recovery cohort used significantly less oral morphine equivalents compared with the pre-enhanced recovery cohort (60.3 mg vs 104.3 mg, P <0.001). The number of patients who required opioid medication within 24 h of discharge was significantly reduced in the enhanced recovery cohort (41.1% vs 74.6%, P <0.001). There were no significant differences in average pain scores (1.6 vs 1.9, P=0.037).Conclusions: The implementation of an enhanced recovery program for cesarean delivery was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption throughout hospitalization, with average pain scores remaining <2. Implementation of this program was also associated with an increase in the number of patients who were opioid-free 24 h prior to discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Remimazolam has recently been introduced as a maintenance agent for general anesthesia. However, the effect of remimazolam on peripartum prognosis has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol for uterotonic drugs following cesarean section., Methods: The electronic medical records of 51 adult women who underwent elective cesarean sections by single obstetrician under general anesthesia were collected. Participants were categorized into two groups: the propofol group and the remimazolam group. General anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of propofol or remimazolam after delivery. The number of uterotonic drugs administered during the cesarean section, the estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay (LOS) after delivery were assessed., Results: Of the 51 patients included in the study, 35 were in the propofol group and 16 in the remimazolam group. In the remimazolam group, five patients (31.3%, 5/16) received more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Conversely, in the propofol group, 19 patients (54.3%, 19/35) were injected with more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal positioning of the placenta ( P  = 0.079) and not using remimazolam ( P  = 0.100) were the most relevant factors associated with the increased use of uterotonics. There was no significant difference in EBL between the two groups. The use of remimazolam was clinically relevant with a shorter LOS ( P  = 0.059)., Conclusions: The use of remimazolam as a maintenance agent did not result in significantly higher use of intrapartum uterotonics compared to the use of propofol. These results cannot exclude all adverse effects of remimazolam during cesarean delivery. Further randomized controlled trials must be conducted to obtain high-quality evidence., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum, the deeply adherent placenta with associated increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality, has seen a significant rise in recent years. Therefore, there has been a rise in clinical and research focus on this complex diagnosis. There is international consensus that a multidisciplinary coordinated approach optimizes outcomes. The composition of the team will vary from center to center; however, central themes of complex surgical experts, specialists in prenatal diagnosis, critical care specialists, neonatology specialists, obstetrics anesthesiology specialists, blood bank specialists, and dedicated mental health experts are universal throughout. Regionalization of care is a growing trend for complex medical needs, but the location of care alone is just a starting point. The goal of this article is to provide an evidence-based framework for the crucial infrastructure needed to address the unique antepartum, delivery, and postpartum needs of the patient with placenta accreta spectrum. Rather than a clinical checklist, we describe the personnel, clinical unit characteristics, and breadth of contributing clinical roles that make up a team. Screening protocols, diagnostic imaging, surgical and potential need for critical care, and trauma-informed interaction are the basis for comprehensive care. The vision from the author group is that this publication provides a semblance of infrastructure standardization as a means to ensure proper preparation and readiness., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The trans-tracheal rapid insufflation of oxygen (TRIO) device is less commonly used and is an alternative to trans-tracheal jet ventilation for maintaining oxygenation in a “cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate” (CICO) scenario. Case: We report the successful use of this device to maintain oxygenation after jet ventilator failure in a parturient who presented with the CICO scenario during the procedure for excision of laryngeal papilloma. Conclusions: A stepwise approach to the airway plan and preparation for an event of failure is essential for good mater-no-fetal outcomes. The TRIO device may result in inadequate ventilation that can lead to hypercarbia and respiratory acidosis. Hence, it should only be used as a temporizing measure before a definitive airway can be secured. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obstetric airway guidelines recommend preoxygenation in preparation for general anaesthesia to achieve end-tidal oxygen concentrations (etO2) of ≥90%, and mention the potential use of high-flow humidified nasal oxygen (HFNO). We investigated the new HFNO technique (Optiflow™) in term pregnant women.Methods: Seventy-three term participants underwent a 3 min HFNO protocol (30 L min-1 for 30 s, and then 50 L min-1 for 150 s). The etO2 was assessed for the first four breaths after simulated preoxygenation. The primary outcome was the proportion who achieved etO2 ≥90% for the first expired breath. The secondary outcomes were the proportion who achieved etO2 ≥80%; fetal heart rate before and after the test; the association of body mass index (BMI) to etO2 achieved with preoxygenation; and comfort levels of, and preference for, nasal and face mask preoxygenation.Results: The proportion with first expired breath etO2 ≥90% was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 54-66%] and etO2 ≥80% was 84% (95% CI: 80-88%). There was no change in fetal heart rate from before to after the test (P=0.34). There was a negative association of BMI to etO2 achieved with preoxygenation (Pearson correlation: -0.26; P=0.027). There was no difference in comfort scores between nasal cannula and face mask (P=0.40). Forty-one (56%; 95% CI: 35-47%) women preferred the nasal cannula to the face mask.Conclusions: HFNO using this protocol is inadequate to preoxygenate term pregnant women. Despite encouraging results in the literature reporting results in non-pregnant women, further work is required before justifying its use in pregnant women.Clinical Trial Registration: ACTRN 12616000531415p. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Use of an in situ epidural catheter has been suggested to be efficient to provide anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL). Reported epidural reactivation success rates vary from 74% to 92%. Predictors for reactivation failure include poor patient satisfaction with labor analgesia, increased delivery-to-reactivation time and the need for top-ups during labor. Some have suggested that this high failure rate precludes leaving the catheter in situ after delivery for subsequent reactivation attempts. In this study, we sought to evaluate the success rate of neuraxial techniques for PPTL and to determine if predictors of failure can be identified. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PPTL after vaginal delivery from July 2010 to July 2016 was conducted using CPT codes, yielding 93 records for analysis. Demographic, obstetric and anesthetic data (labor analgesia administration, length of epidural catheter in epidural space, top-up requirements, time of catheter reactivation, final anesthetic technique and corresponding doses for spinal and epidural anesthesia) were obtained. Results: A total of 70 patients received labor neuraxial analgesia. Reactivation was attempted in 33 with a success rate of 66.7%. Patient height, epidural volume of local anesthetic and administered fentanyl dose were lower in the group that failed reactivation. Overall, spinal anesthesia was performed in 60 patients, with a success rate of 80%. Conclusions: Our observed rate of successful postpartum epidural reactivation for tubal ligation was lower than the range reported in the literature. Our success rates for both spinal anesthesia and epidural reactivation for PPTL were lower than the generally accepted rates of successful epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. This gap may reflect a lower level of motivation on behalf of both the patients and anesthesia providers to tolerate “imperfect” neuraxial anesthesia once fetal considerations are removed.

Copyright of Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation is the property of Turkiye Klinikleri and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: during the scheduled cesarean section, the main side effect of the spinal anesthesia is the spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH). Objective: to identify the course of action with regard to the use of fluids and vasopressors for the prevention and management of the SAIH during the cesarean section in healthy women. Methods: a survey by means of e-mail address was carried out to the members of the Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SCARE) in April in 2012, with the objective to determine their strategies for the prevention and management of the SIAH with regard to the use of fluids and vasopressors. This survey was created by the authors and without the validation process. Results: of 2113 anesthesiologists, just 491 (23.2%) answered the survey. 61.7% of the participants used fluids as prevention strategies of the SAIH. Of them, 60% administered it only as precharge and the other ones as adjuvant. 10.2% of all the participants combined intravenous fluids and vasopressors. 3.7% used only vasopressors and the 24.4% did not use any of those measures as prevention of the SAIH. The crystalloids were used by more than 99% of the survey respondents that administer fluids in a routine way, being the doses of preference between 500 and 1000 cc. Just the 14% of the survey respondents use vasopressors in a prophylactic way, from which the 53% uses etilefrine, the majority in intravenous bolus. The majority of the survey respondent use vasopressors just in a therapeutic way, being preferred by 65% the etilefrine, followed by the ephedrine, both administered mainly in intravenous bolus. Conclusions: the etilefrine is the most used agent by a group of Colombian anesthesiologists belong to the SCARE, mainly in intravenous bolus, as prophylactic and therapeutic measure for the SAIH in cesarean section. Rev.cienc.biomed. 2014;5(2):263-271. KEYWORDS Hypotension, Obstetrical anesthesia, Spinal anesthesia, Vasoconstrictor agents

Background Although many women with physical disabilities report poor quality reproductive health care, little research has addressed labor, delivery, and anesthesia experiences of these women. This study was conducted to explore these experiences in women with significant mobility disabilities. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 22 women from the United States who had delivered newborns within the prior 10 years. All had significant mobility disabilities. Two-hour, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted using a semistructured, open-ended interview protocol, which addressed many topics, including labor, delivery, and anesthesia experiences. We recruited most participants through social networks, interviewing women from 17 states. Conventional content analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, was used to identify major themes. Results The mean age of women was 34.8 ± 5.3 years. Most women were white, college educated, and used wheeled mobility aids. Four key themes emerged from participants' narratives of laboring and giving birth with a disability. These included women's preferences for type of delivery, clinicians and some women expected no labor pain, fears prompting active advocacy, and positive experiences. As participants discussed their experiences with anesthesia, four additional themes were identified: importance of consultation with the anesthesia team, decisions about epidural/spinal vs general anesthesia, failed epidural with repeated efforts, and fear of injury related to anesthesia. Conclusions The responses of women in this study suggest that there is need to make intrapartum care better for women with physical disabilities and to improve their experiences with labor, birth, and obstetric anesthesia care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data on the effects of general anesthesia on the fetal and neonatal brain are limited. Animal studies demonstrated that anesthetic agents leave their consequences in the form of learning and memory deficits. The effects of propofol on the fetal neurodevelopment are not clear yet. Materials and Methods: This is a telephone-based questionnaire survey that addressed the effect of general anesthesia by propofol during cesarean section at term with no perinatal complications on the psychosocial behavior of children at 8-10 years of age compared with children having same characteristics except for delivery under neuraxial anesthesia using the Pediatric Symptom Checklist as a score. Results: A total of 187 children were born at term between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004 with no perinatal distress under induction of general anesthesia by propofol. 66 children (35.3%) were lost to follow-up and parents of two children (1.1%) refused to participate. A total of 189 children were included in the study: 119 were born by cesarean section under general anesthesia and 70 were born by cesarean section under neuraxial block. The incidence of psychosocial behavior impairment at 8-10 years of age was not found to be affected by the mode of anesthesia during delivery by cesarean section nor by neonatal nor parental characteristics. Conclusion: Exposure to propofol as an induction agent for general anesthesia or cesarean section does not seem to increase the psychosocial behavior disorder development risk at 8-10 years of age.

Background: We hypothesized that patients who underwent unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery and had removal of an indwelling epidural catheter followed by an attempt of a new regional anesthetic would be more likely to have regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication compared to patients who had activation of an epidural catheter., Methods: Patients who had an unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, who had an indwelling labor epidural catheter were included. Patients were propensity matched based on obstetric indication for cesarean delivery and number of physician-administered rescue analgesia boluses administered during labor. A multivariate proportional odds regression was performed., Results: After adjusting for parity, depression, last neuraxial labor analgesic technique, physician-administered rescue analgesia boluses, and duration from neuraxial placement to entering the operating room for cesarean delivery, patients who had removal of their epidural catheters were more likely to have regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication (odds ratio 4.298; 95% confidence interval 2.448, 7.548; P  < 0.01)., Conclusion: Removal of epidural catheters was associated with a greater chance of avoiding conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication., Competing Interests: The authors report no external funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Baylor University Medical Center.)

Background: The use of epidural analgesia represents the gold standard for pain management during labor, but the influence of the use of epidural analgesia on delivery mode is not fully understood., Objective: This study aimed to analyze the impact of epidural analgesia on the delivery mode, namely, cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates, in Robson class 1 women., Study Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all Robson class 1 women who delivered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, in the University Hospital of Modena. The primary outcome was the delivery mode (cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates), and the secondary outcomes were maternal, anesthesiologic, and neonatal effects of epidural analgesia (duration of labor, duration of the second stage of labor, Apgar score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission)., Results: A total of 744 women were included in the final analysis, of which 198 (26.6%) underwent epidural analgesia on request and 546 (73.4%) did not. In women with and without epidural analgesia, the cesarean delivery rate was 8.1% vs 7%, the vaginal delivery rate was 79.3% vs 81.1%, and the operative vaginal delivery rate was 12.6% vs 11.9%, respectively. A significant increase in both the first stage of labor (66.3±38.5 vs 43.8±38.8 minutes; P <.0001) and total duration of labor (328.0±206.7 vs 201.7±168.3 minutes; P <.0001) was found in women receiving epidural analgesia. No change was recorded in the second stage of labor. A shorter duration of labor was observed ( P <.0001) when epidural analgesia was started earlier (dilation: 2-4 cm vs >4 cm). No significant difference in Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission was found., Conclusion: The use of epidural analgesia was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery in Robson class 1 women. Further investigations are needed to evaluate its impact on the duration of labor, namely the duration of the first stage of labor, and on the possible advantages of starting epidural analgesia at an early stage., (© 2023 The Authors.)