Search

If we analyse the semantic field of the term “anthropology” we find that the idea covers a very wide range. At the same time however, expressed opinion follows three basic ways. First of all through definitions or lists of characteristics. Or else through the choice of methods used to analyse the human fact. Finally there are the moments where a researcher admits that he can define only the contours of a concept whose core he still ignores. We can say that there exists an “anthropology” in an ethnographic sense or a “biological anthropology”. But every thought also has an “anthropological instant”, that is an explicit or implicit representation of humanity which stands out from interpretations and epistemological passages., L'analyse du champ sémantique du terme « anthropologie » a montré une grande dispersion de la notion. Mais en même temps, les affirmations anthropologiques s'expriment de trois manières principales. Tout d'abord par des définitions ou de liste de caractéristiques. Ou encore par le choix des méthodes employées pour l'analyse de l'humain. Ou enfin dans les instants où un chercheur avoue qu'il ne peut que préciser les contours de ce qui lui reste inconnu. On peut dire qu'il existe une « anthropologie » au sens de l'ethnographie ou de l'anthropologie biologique. Mais aussi que toute réflexion a son « instant anthropologique », une représentation de l'humain, explicite ou implicite, qui émerge dans les passages interprétatifs ou épistémologiques.

LPSC-si ;; If we analyse the semantic field of the term “anthropology” we find that the idea covers a very wide range. At the same time however, expressed opinion follows three basic ways. First of all through definitions or lists of characteristics. Or else through the choice of methods used to analyse the human fact. Finally there are the moments where a researcher admits that he can define only the contours of a concept whose core he still ignores. We can say that there exists an “anthropology” in an ethnographic sense or a “biological anthropology”. But every thought also has an “anthropological instant”, that is an explicit or implicit representation of humanity which stands out from interpretations and epistemological passages.

If we analyse the semantic field of the term “anthropology” we find that the idea covers a very wide range. At the same time however, expressed opinion follows three basic ways. First of all through definitions or lists of characteristics. Or else through the choice of methods used to analyse the human fact. Finally there are the moments where a researcher admits that he can define only the contours of a concept whose core he still ignores. We can say that there exists an “anthropology” in an ethnographic sense or a “biological anthropology”. But every thought also has an “anthropological instant”, that is an explicit or implicit representation of humanity which stands out from interpretations and epistemological passages.; Pas de résumé

Neutron-deficient isotopes with Z=21 to 26 have been produced as projectile-like fragments of an intense 58Ni GANIL beam of 69 MeV/nucleon. The nuclei selected by the upgraded LISE3 spectrometer were identified and implanted in a silicon detector telescope. The 43Cr, 47Fe and 46Fe isotopes were identified for the first time whereas 45Fe, 45Mn, 44Mn and 42V were not observed, indicating probable instability of these nuclei against particle emission. Measurements of the half-lives of 43Cr and 46Mn have been performed and the analysis of their measured beta-delayed proton spectra has given, through the isobaric multiplet mass equation, an empirical estimation of their masses. Half-lives of 44Cr, 43V, 47Fe and 46Fe have also been measured. A discussion of various mass predictions for nuclei at the proton drip-line is given.