Search

Background and objective: Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is required when repair is not feasible, and it continues to be a relatively high-risk procedure owing to the complex medical and/or surgical profile of patients. The choice between mechanical and biological prostheses for TVR remains a subject of debate owing to their distinct advantages and disadvantages. This study aimed to analyse and compare the clinical outcomes of these two types of prostheses in the tricuspid position. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the COCHRANE library were searched from 1995 to April 2023 for studies comparing clinical outcomes of mechanical versus biological valves in the tricuspid position. Data on 30-day mortality, reoperations, 5-year valve failure rates, thrombotic/thromboembolic events, and long-term survival were extracted, pooled, and analysed. Forest plots were generated using a random-effects model. Results: From an initial pool of 4716 citations, 37 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were assessed, collectively encompassing 8316 prostheses (3796 mechanical, 4520 bioprostheses). Our analysis revealed that mechanical valves exhibited a non-significant trend towards diminished 30-day mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.69–1.06). A distinct disparity emerged in valve durability, with mechanical valves demonstrating a significantly increased risk of 5-year valve failure (RR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.38–3.56). Strikingly, mechanical valves displayed a substantial six-fold elevated risk of thrombotic events (RR = 6.29, 95% CI = 3.98–9.92). In contrast, the long-term survival and reoperation rates demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the two valve types. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides insights into the selection of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves for TVR. These findings highlight the potential advantages and disadvantages of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in terms of early mortality, valve durability, and thrombotic risk. Our analysis provides clinicians with evidence-based guidance for optimizing outcomes in TVR, offering a foundation for informed decision-making in this intricate surgical landscape. Despite these insights, clinicians must overcome the limitations of retrospective studies, evolving healthcare, and anticoagulant disparities to ensure careful consideration in tricuspid valve replacement decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and objective Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is required when repair is not feasible, and it continues to be a relatively high-risk procedure owing to the complex medical and/or surgical profile of patients. The choice between mechanical and biological prostheses for TVR remains a subject of debate owing to their distinct advantages and disadvantages. This study aimed to analyse and compare the clinical outcomes of these two types of prostheses in the tricuspid position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the COCHRANE library were searched from 1995 to April 2023 for studies comparing clinical outcomes of mechanical versus biological valves in the tricuspid position. Data on 30-day mortality, reoperations, 5-year valve failure rates, thrombotic/thromboembolic events, and long-term survival were extracted, pooled, and analysed. Forest plots were generated using a random-effects model. Results From an initial pool of 4716 citations, 37 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were assessed, collectively encompassing 8316 prostheses (3796 mechanical, 4520 bioprostheses). Our analysis revealed that mechanical valves exhibited a non-significant trend towards diminished 30-day mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.69–1.06). A distinct disparity emerged in valve durability, with mechanical valves demonstrating a significantly increased risk of 5-year valve failure (RR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.38–3.56). Strikingly, mechanical valves displayed a substantial six-fold elevated risk of thrombotic events (RR = 6.29, 95% CI = 3.98–9.92). In contrast, the long-term survival and reoperation rates demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the two valve types. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis provides insights into the selection of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves for TVR. These findings highlight the potential advantages and disadvantages of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in terms of early mortality, valve durability, and thrombotic risk. Our analysis provides clinicians with evidence-based guidance for optimizing outcomes in TVR, offering a foundation for informed decision-making in this intricate surgical landscape. Despite these insights, clinicians must overcome the limitations of retrospective studies, evolving healthcare, and anticoagulant disparities to ensure careful consideration in tricuspid valve replacement decisions.

Calcification of the mitral valve annulus is common in patients on dialysis. The growing number of individuals receiving dialysis has been accompanied by an increase in cases necessitating surgical intervention for mitral valve annulus calcification. In this report, we present a severe case characterized by bulky calcification of the mitral annulus, which was managed with mechanical mitral valve replacement. A 61-year-old man on dialysis presented with chest pain upon exertion that had persisted for 3 months. Cardiac echocardiography revealed severe mitral stenosis and regurgitation, accompanied by cardiac dysfunction. During surgery, an ultrasonic aspiration system was employed to remove the calcification of the mitral valve annulus to the necessary extent. Subsequently, a mechanical mitral valve was sutured into the supra-annular position. To address the regurgitation, the area surrounding the valve was sewn to the wall of the left atrium. Postoperative assessments indicated an absence of perivalvular leak and demonstrated improved cardiac function. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 22. We describe a successful mitral mechanical valve replacement in a case of extensive circumferential mitral annular calcification. Even with severe calcification extending into the left ventricular myocardium, we were able to minimize the decalcification process. This approach enabled the performance of mitral mechanical valve replacement in a high-risk patient on dialysis, thus expanding the possibilities for cardiac surgery.

Background: In vitro assessment is mandatory for artificial heart valve development. This study aims to investigate the effects of pulse duplicator features on valve responsiveness, conduct a sensitivity analysis across valve prosthesis types, and contribute on the development of versatile pulse duplicator systems able to perform reliable prosthetic aortic valve assessment under physiologic hemodynamic conditions. Methods: A reference pulse duplicator was established based on literature. Further optimization process led to new designs that underwent a parametric study, also involving different aortic valve prostheses. These designs were evaluated on criteria such as mean pressure differential and pulse pressure (assessed from high‐fidelity pressure measurements), valve opening and closing behavior, flow, and regurgitation. Finally, the resulting optimized setup was tested under five different hemodynamic settings simulating a range of physiologic and pathologic conditions. Results: The results show that both, pulse duplicator design and valve type significantly influence aortic and ventricular pressure, flow, and valve kinematic response. The optimal design comprised key features such as a compliance chamber and restrictor for diastolic pressure maintenance and narrow pulse pressure. Additionally, an atrial reservoir was included to prevent atrial–aortic interference, and a bioprosthetic valve was used in mitral position to avoid delayed valve closing effects. Conclusion: This study showed that individual pulse duplicator features can have a significant effect on valve's responsiveness. The optimized versatile pulse duplicator replicated physiologic and pathologic aortic valve hemodynamic conditions, serving as a reliable characterization tool for assessing and optimizing aortic valve performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Patients with congenital heart disease frequently require surgical or percutaneous interventional valve replacement after initial congenital heart defect (CHD) repair. In some of these patients, simultaneous replacement of both semilunar valves is necessary, resulting in increased procedural complexity, morbidity, and mortality. In this study, we analyze the outcomes of simultaneous aortic and pulmonary valve replacements following multiple surgical interventions for CHD. Methods This was a retrospective study of 24 patients who after initial repair of CHD underwent single-stage aortic and pulmonary valve replacement at our institution between 2003 and 2021. Results The mean age of the patients was 28 ± 13 years; the mean time since the last surgery was 15 ± 11 years. Decellularized valved homografts (DVHs) were used in nine patients, and mechanical valves were implanted in seven others. In eight patients, DVHs, biological, and mechanical valves were implanted in various combinations. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 303 ± 104 minutes, and aortic cross-clamp time was 152 ± 73 minutes. Two patients died at 12 and 16 days postoperatively. At a maximum follow-up time of 17 years (mean 7 ± 5 years), 95% of the surviving patients were categorized as New York Heart Association heart failure class I. Conclusion Single-stage aortic and pulmonary valve replacement after initial repair of CHD remains challenging with substantial perioperative mortality (8.3%). Nevertheless, long-term survival and clinical status at the latest follow-up were excellent. The valve type had no relevant impact on the postoperative course. The selection of the valves for implantation should take into account operation-specific factors—in particular reoperability—as well as the patients' wishes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The timing of treatment for chronic aortic valve regurgitation (AR), especially in asymptomatic patients, is gaining attention since less invasive strategies have become available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AR. Methods: Patients (n = 25) who underwent surgical AVR for severe AR with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 55% were included in this study. Preprocedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiographic measurements of LVEF and left ventricular (LV) diameters were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Mean LVEF increased significantly following surgical AVR (p < 0.0001). LV diameters showed a clear regression (p = 0.0088). Younger patients and those receiving a mechanical valve tended to have less improved LVEF on follow-up than patients over 60 years or the ones who were implanted with a biological prosthesis (p = 0.0239 and p = 0.069, respectively). Gender had no effect on the degree of LVEF improvement (p = 0.4908). Conclusions: We demonstrated significant LV reverse remodeling following AVR for AR. However, more data are needed on LV functional and geometrical improvement comparing the different types of valve prostheses to provide an optimal treatment strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES Prothesis choice in isolated mitral valve replacement for patients aged 75 years or younger remains debated as most studies comparing prothesis type have included large proportions of combined operations and benefits are influenced by concomitant procedures. This study compared long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valves in different age groups of propensity-matched populations. METHODS This is a retrospective, multicentre, propensity-matched observational study. Baseline characteristics, operative details and long-term outcomes (mortality and freedom from surgical/transcatheter reintervention) were collected. RESULTS Totally, 1536 isolated mitral valve replacements (806 mechanical, 730 bioprosthetic) were performed between 2000 and 2017. Over 90% of eligible patients successfully underwent propensity matching, yielding 226 each of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in patients aged <65 years and 171 each of bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in patients aged 65–75 years with median follow-up of 13 years (maximum 20 years). In matched patients <65 years, 10-year survival was superior with mechanical valves versus bioprosthetic valves (78.2% vs 69.8%, P  = 0.029), as was 10-year freedom from reintervention (96.2% vs 81.3%, P  < 0.001). For matched patients between 65 and 75 years, there were no differences between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in 10-year survival (64.6% vs 60.8%, P  = 0.86) or 10-year freedom from reintervention (94.0% vs 97.2%, P  = 0.23). Rates of post-operative stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure and permanent pacemaker insertion were similar. CONCLUSIONS In patients requiring isolated mitral valve replacement, mechanical valves confer significantly better long-term survival and freedom from reintervention for patients <65 years, while no benefit is observed at age 65–75 years compared to bioprosthetic valves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Dysfunction and thrombosis of mechanical heart valves, although uncommon, represents a challenge that requires multidisciplinary expertise for diagnosis and management. The aim of this review is to summarize strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies for this uncommon but potentially life-threatening pathology. Recent Findings: Expeditious diagnosis of mechanical valve thrombosis and exclusion of other diagnostic considerations, often with incorporation of multimodality imaging, can inform the best treatment strategy. Summary: Presentation of mechanical valve thrombosis can be asymptomatic or can include heart failure, life-threatening embolic events, or cardiogenic shock. Echocardiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography are important in the evaluation of mechanical valve dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies for thrombosis include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis, and surgery. Choice of treatment depends on multiple factors including thrombus size, degree of valve dysfunction, clinical presentation, and available surgical expertise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sura Markos,1 Yegzeru Belete,2 Abdulkerim Girma,3 Molla Derbew4 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia; 2School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia; 3Department of Radiology, New York Internal Medicine Specialty Clinic, Hawassa, Ethiopia; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology Unit, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, EthiopiaCorrespondence: Sura Markos; Yegzeru Belete, Email surmark430@gmail.com; ybtmeat.1@gmail.comAbstract: This report reviews an Ethiopian patient who underwent cardiac surgery and had a mechanical heart valve implanted on the mitral valve with tricuspid valve repair for rheumatic heart disease via a local non-profit organization donation later complicated by cardio-embolic stroke, and aims to describe the challenges faced by patients from rural Ethiopia who require cardiac surgery for rheumatic heart disease and narrate the importance of careful follow-up. The lessons to be drawn from this case are that careful follow-up and adherence to prescribed Vitamin K antagonists after surgery for mechanical heart valves are critical and, when such patients are lost to follow-up as was witnessed in this case, it can induce lifelong morbidity. Morbidity that could have been avoided with strict and meticulous follow-up and with standardized patient tracing or contact systems. When patients are lost to follow-up it needs to be top priority to trace them after cardiac surgery and this report highlights the pivotal role of the health education in such populations. Unless we utilize this opportunity to unlock the door and embrace a systemic approach to reforming our risk assessment, referral chain system, and integration of various healthcare professionals in patient follow-up, as well as enhancing health education among our patients in rural Ethiopia and other low-income countries, the consequences could prove to be significant. Preventing such fatal complications is far superior to managing them afterwards, as it not only saves on expenses but also saves lives and enhances quality-of-life.Keywords: anticoagulation, mechanical valve, cardioembolic stroke, sub-Sahara

Abstract Objective Reports on long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients aged

Background: This study compared the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients aged 50 to 70 years based on the type of prosthetic valve used. Methods: We compared patients who underwent mechanical AVR to those who underwent bioprosthetic AVR at our institution between January 2000 and March 2019. Competing risk analysis and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method based on propensity score were employed for comparisons. Results: A total of 1,580 patients (984 patients with mechanical AVR; 596 patients with bioprosthetic AVR) were enrolled. There was no significant difference in early mortality between the mechanical AVR and bioprosthetic AVR groups (0.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.177). After IPTW adjustment, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the bioprosthetic AVR group than in the mechanical AVR group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–1.80; p=0.014). Competing risk analysis revealed lower risks of stroke (sub-distributional hazard ratio [sHR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28–0.67; p

Introduction: The choice of an artificial mitral valve (MV) is a crucial clinical decision that affects the long-term survival and quality of life of patients. However, current guidelines recommend selecting MV based on patient age and life expectancy at the time of mitral valve replacement (MVR), without considering the etiology of MV disease. This study aimed to investigate whether MV disease etiology should be considered when choosing a valve for MVR and to evaluate the impact of MV disease etiology on long-term patient survival. Methods: Using data (2002-2018) from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, the authors conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study to compare the biological and mechanical valves in terms of all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. The inverse probability of the treatment weighting method was used to reduce the effects of the confounding factors. The following etiologies were assessed: infective endocarditis, rheumatic heart disease, ischemic mitral regurgitation, and degenerative mitral regurgitation. Results: In patients aged below 70 years, it was observed that mechanical valves demonstrated an association with benefits compared to biological valves in the context of survival. In patients with infective endocarditis aged below 72 years, mechanical valves were associated with survival benefits, but not in those with stroke during hospitalization. These valves were also found to be linked with survival advantages for patients with rheumatic heart disease aged below 60 years and for those with degenerative mitral regurgitation aged below 72 years. However, no age-dependent effects of valve type on all-cause mortality were observed in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation. Conclusion: The etiology of MV disease appears to be important in the selection of a suitable MV and determination of a cutoff age for mechanical and biological MVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Reports on long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients aged < 60 years are scarce in Japan. Hence, we aimed to evaluate these outcomes in patients aged < 60 years. Methods: Between March 2000 and December 2020, 1477 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. In total, 170 patients aged < 60 years who underwent aortic valve replacement were recruited. Patients aged < 18 years were excluded. Patient data collected from the operative records and follow-up assessments were reviewed. Results: The mean age was 49 ± 9 years, and 64.1% of patients were male. One-hundred-and-fifty-two patients (89.4%) underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve and 18 (10.6%) with a bioprosthetic valve. The mean follow-up period was 8.1 ± 5.5 years. No operative mortality occurred, and in-hospital mortality occurred in one patient (0.6%). Ten late deaths occurred, with seven cardiac-related deaths. The overall survival rate was 95.4 ± 1.7%, 93.9 ± 2.3%, 90.6 ± 3.9%, and 73.2 ± 11.8% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from major bleeding was 96.4 ± 1.6% at 5, 10, and 15 years, and 89.0 ± 7.3% at 20 years. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 98.7 ± 1.3%, 97.3 ± 1.9%, 90.5 ± 4.5%, and 79.0 ± 11.3% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from valve-related reoperation was 99.4 ± 0.6% at 5 years, 97.8 ± 1.7% at 10 and 15 years, and 63.9 ± 14.5% at 20 years. Conclusions: Patients aged < 60 years undergoing aortic valve replacement with a high mechanical valve implantation rate had favorable long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis are efficiently treated by aortic valve replacement (AVR), using a biological or mechanical valve. For some patients with mechanical valves, the metallic clicking sound may be problematic. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceived disturbance from the sound of a mechanical valve and the association between noise perception and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Methods and results The study had a cross-sectional design. In April 2013, all patients who had undergone AVR at one university hospital during the period 2000–12 were invited by post to participate. The primary variables were assessed using a valve-specific questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Of the 912 (77%) respondents, 245 had mechanical valves. Of these, 59 (24%) were women, the mean (standard deviation) age was 61 (11) years, and the mean time since surgery was 7 (3) years. The valve-specific questionnaire showed that 84% of the patients could sometimes or often hear the valve sound. A moderate positive correlation was found between valve prosthesis noise disturbance and anxiety, r = 0.35 (P = 0.001), and depression, r = 0.27 (P = 0.001). In a multiple linear regression analysis, valve noise perception was only significantly associated with anxiety among several other bio-psychosocial factors. Conclusion This study shows an association between valve noise disturbance and symptoms of anxiety and highlights the importance of preparing all patients for the sound from the mechanical valves that arises after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Complex atrial tachycardia (AT) is commonly observed in patients with cardiac surgery. High-density mapping is widely adopted for catheter ablation of complex AT in patients with cardiac surgery. Several case reports have described that PentaRay mapping catheter can be trapped in the mechanical valve and sheared off and successful retrieval of the spline by a snare system. We described a rare case in which PentaRay mapping catheter spline was successfully retrieved from the distal anterior tibial artery by direct syringe suction via the diagnostic catheter following entrapment in the mechanical mitral valve (MV) and rupture of the spline. Case summary A 70-year-old female with mechanical bileaflet MV underwent catheter ablation for AT. During mapping in left atrium, the catheter was entrapped in mechanical MV and sheared off. We attempted to release the entrapped the spline by advancing the ablation catheter towards the stuck disc and pushing on the hinge portion of the disc with the catheter tip. The stuck and closed disc was opened, and the deeply entrapped spline was released. However, the entrapped PentaRay spline floated through the Valsalva sinus and strayed into the distal left anterior tibial artery. Fortunately, we successfully retrieved the spline from the distal anterior tibial artery by direct syringe suction instead of a snare system. Discussion The possibility of the entrapment and subsequent rupture of the spline should always be considered during mapping the site close to mechanical valve. A rapid retrieval of embolized material should be carried out. If the spline strays into the distal and small artery in which the snare system is difficult to advance, a direct syringe suction via the diagnostic catheter may be attempted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background For patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), structural valve deterioration (SVD) of a bioprosthesis (BP) is substantially accelerated in younger patients and valve-in-valve implantation is not always a considerable option. The risk–benefit assessment between SVD versus the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with a mechanical prosthesis (MP) resulted in an age limit shift irrespective of inconsistent results reported in literature. Method This retrospective single-center study compared 10-year long-term outcomes in patients undergoing isolated AVR with MP or BP. The risk-adjusted comparison of patients undergoing isolated AVR (n = 121) was performed after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, endocarditis, and chronic renal impairment (caliper of 0.2) leading to 29 pairs. Short- and long-term outcomes with respect to reoperation, major bleeding, stroke, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and overall survival at 10 years were analyzed. Results After PSM, groups were comparable with respect to preoperative characteristics, including patients with a mean age of 65 ± 3 years (MP) and 66 ± 4 years (BP) and an incidence rate of 6.9% for infective endocarditis in both cohorts. Short-term outcomes (transient neurologic disorder = 0.0 vs. 6.9%; stroke = 0.0%; in-hospital mortality = 3.4%) and in-hospital stays were comparable between MP and BP. Conclusion After isolated AVR with MP and BP, 10-year long-term outcomes were comparable in the reported single-center cohort. MP can still be implanted safely without a disadvantage as regards long-term survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES This nationwide retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of the explanted valve type on reoperative outcomes in aortic valve surgery within the UK over a 23-year period. METHODS Data were sourced from the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR) database. All patients undergoing first-time isolated reoperative aortic valve replacement between 1996 and 2019 in the UK were included. Concomitant procedures, homograft implantation or aortic root enlargement were excluded. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare outcomes and risk factors for in-hospital mortality was evaluated through multivariable logistic regression. Final model selection was conducted using Akaike Information Criterion through bootstrapping. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality, and secondary end points included postoperative morbidities. RESULTS Out of 2371 patients, 24.9% had mechanical and 75% had bioprosthetic valves implanted during the primary procedure. Propensity matched groups of 324 patients each, were compared. In-hospital mortality for mechanical and bioprosthetic valve explants was 7.1% and 5.9%, respectively (P  = 0.632). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, valve type was not a risk factor for mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37–1.05; P  = 0.1]. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05; P  < 0.05), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.08–2.42; P  < 0.05), creatinine ≥ 200 mg/dl (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.17–4.04; P  < 0.05) and endocarditis (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.71–4.14; P  < 0.05) emerged as risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS The type of valve initially implanted (mechanical or bioprosthetic) did not determine mortality. Instead, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal impairment and endocarditis were significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Aortic stenosis is a prevalent valvular disease characterized with outflow obstruction of left ventricle especially in patients with advanced ages. Definitive treatment of this disorder is valve replacement and done via different kinds of prosthetic valves. Herein we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the individuals underwent aortic valve replacement by using sutureless or conventional mechanical valve. Material and Methods: Between 2020-2023, totally 102 patients underwent aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis were involved in the study. Patients were seperated into two groups according to the valve prothesis used in operations, sutureless valve group (n=50) and conventional mechanical valve group (n=52). Results: The mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and side clamp and were significantly decreased in the sutureless valve group than conventional one (52.6±32.2 vs. 77.4±35.3 minutes and 86.4±18.5 vs. 121.8±13.45 minutes, p<.001). Duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospitalization were also significantly lower in sutureless group. Conclusion: Although patients operated by using sutureless valve are older, they have satisfactoried intra and postoperative outcomes. Therefore, aortic valve replacement operations can be performed reliably with sutureless valves in patients with advanced ages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When the options of aortic valve repair or the Ross procedure are not feasible or have been exhausted, mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) may provide a reliable and structurally durable alternative, but with the limitations of long-term anticoagulation, thrombosis risk and lack of valve growth potential. In this article, we review the longitudinal outcomes of mechanical AVR in children in our institution and compare them to those recently reported by others. From 1978 to 2020, 62 patients underwent mechanical AVR at a median age of 12.4 years (interquartile range (IQR): 8.6-16.8 years). The most common underlying diagnoses were: conotruncal anomalies (40%, 25/62), congenital aortic stenosis (16%, 10/62), rheumatic valve disease (16%, 10/62), connective tissue disease (8.1%, 5/62) and infective endocarditis (6.5%, 4/62). Thirty-two patients (52%, 32/62) had at least 1 prior aortic valve surgery prior to mechanical AVR. Early death was 3.2% (2/62). Median follow-up was 14.4 years (IQR: 8.4-28.2 years). Kaplan-Meier survival was 96.8%, 91.9%, 86.3%, and 81.9% at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years. On competing risk analysis, the proportion of patients alive without aortic valve reoperation at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years was 95.2%, 87.0%, 75.5% and 55.4%, respectively, while the proportion of patients that had aortic valve reoperation (with death as a competing event) at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years was 1.6%, 4.9%, 12.8%, and 28.5%, respectively. In conclusion, when the options of aortic valve repair or the Ross procedure are not feasible in children, mechanical AVR is an alternative, yet the long-term rates of mortality and need for aortic valve reoperation are of concern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mitral valve replacement is a surgical procedure to replace a damaged or diseased mitral valve in the heart. There are different techniques for mitral valve replacement, including open-heart surgery and minimally invasive heart surgery. Here, we describe detailed steps of mitral valve replacement with a mechanical bileaflet valve which can be used by early career surgeons as a reference to perform safe cardiac surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The timing of treatment for chronic aortic valve regurgitation (AR), especially in asymptomatic patients, is gaining attention since less invasive strategies have become available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AR. Methods: Patients (n = 25) who underwent surgical AVR for severe AR with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 55% were included in this study. Preprocedural and follow-up clinical and echocardiographic measurements of LVEF and left ventricular (LV) diameters were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Mean LVEF increased significantly following surgical AVR (p < 0.0001). LV diameters showed a clear regression (p = 0.0088). Younger patients and those receiving a mechanical valve tended to have less improved LVEF on follow-up than patients over 60 years or the ones who were implanted with a biological prosthesis (p = 0.0239 and p = 0.069, respectively). Gender had no effect on the degree of LVEF improvement (p = 0.4908). Conclusions: We demonstrated significant LV reverse remodeling following AVR for AR. However, more data are needed on LV functional and geometrical improvement comparing the different types of valve prostheses to provide an optimal treatment strategy.

Objective: Cardiovascular diseases emerge as one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in developed countries. These risks are even higher in women with prosthetic cardiac valves. The core of the care for these women and the fetus during the hypercoagulable state of the pregnancy and postpartum period is the achievement of coagulation control using adjusted anticoagulation therapy protocols. A multidisciplinary team that includes obstetricians, cardiologists, hematologists, and anesthesiologists in a referral center is essential for an optimal maternal-fetal outcome. In particular, these measures are directed at preventing one of the most serious complications associated with mechanical valve dysfunction. The dysfunctional valve in the mitral position increases maternal and fetal mortality by 30%, especially in the presence of heart failure symptoms. Here we present a case of a 32-week pregnant woman diagnosed with dysfunction of the mechanical mitral valve (MV) and an emergency multidisciplinary approach to her treatment.

Abstract Background There has been a resurgence in interest regarding the Ross procedure due to recent publications detailing positive long-term outcomes. Conversely, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a pulmonary homograft (PH), mechanical (MV), bioprosthetic (BV), or the Ozaki procedure each has its own technical advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing other alternatives to Ross procedure. Methods Medical databases were comprehensively searched for studies comparing the Ross procedure with AVR using a PH, MV, BV, or the Ozaki procedure. Outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results A total of 7816 patients were pooled for our NMA from 24 studies. Compared to Ross procedure, both BV and MV were associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality of RR (2.37, 95% CI 1.20–4.67) and (1.88 95% CI 1.04–3.40), respectively, with no significant difference regarding PH or Ozaki. However, only MV was associated with a higher risk of 30-day stroke (RR 8.42, 95% CI 1.57–45.23) with no significant difference in the other alternatives, as well as 30-day MI which showed no significant differences between any of the aortic conduits compared to the Ross procedure. Regarding 30-day major bleeding, MV was associated with a higher when compared to the Ross procedure RR (4.58, 95% CI 1.94–10.85), PH was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding with RR (0.35, 95% CI 0.17–0.71), and BV showed no significant difference. With a mean follow-up duration of 8.5 years compared to the Ross procedure, BV, PH, and MV were associated with a higher risk of long-term mortality with RR (1.89, 95% CI 1.38–2.58), (1.38, 95% CI 1.0–1.87), and (1.94, 95% CI 1.52–2.47), respectively, with the Ozaki procedure showed no significant difference. Regarding long-term stroke—with a mean of 6.3-year follow-up duration—there were no significant differences between any of the aortic conduits compared to the Ross procedure. Nevertheless, long-term need for reintervention—with a mean follow-up duration of 17.5 years—was significant of higher risk with both BV and PH with RR (3.28, 95% CI 1.21–8.84) and (2.42, 95% CI 1.05–5.58), respectively, compared to Ross procedure with MV and Ozaki having no significant difference. Conclusions The Ross procedure is a viable treatment option for patients undergoing SAVR, showing promising outcomes at short- and long-term follow-ups.

Introduction: For patients with mechanical aortic valves, guideline recommended INR targets range from 2.0 to 3.5, depending on thromboembolic risk factors. Supporting data is largely historical and of low quality. We aimed to characterize clinicians’ practices around INR targets for these patients and perceptions of evidence supporting these recommendations. Methods: A 33-question web-based survey was sent to 75 cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and thrombosis specialists globally. We inquired about anticoagulation practices for patients with mechanical aortic valves, perceptions of guideline recommendations, and interest in participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing lower and higher INR targets in these patients. Results: Of 55 respondents (73% response rate), 78% worked in academic hospitals. In patients with mechanical aortic valve and no additional thromboembolic risk factors, 80% targeted an INR of 2.5. Among patients with additional thromboembolic risk factors, 48% targeted an INR of 2.5, while 44% targeted an INR of 3.0. Additionally, 57% of respondents believed that evidence for the guidelines was up to date, and 53% believed that it applied to bi-leaflet valves.However, 57% of respondents said that the evidence was not high quality. Lastly, 66% of respondents would accept a higher thromboembolic risk to reduce risk of major bleeding; 86% were willing to randomize patients with mechanical aortic valve to a target INR of 2.0 if they had no thromboembolic risk factors. Conclusion: Clinicians target different INRs for patients with mechanical aortic valves; their perception of the evidence and guidelines varies. Of respondents, 86% would randomize patients to lower INR targets.

Objectives: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and carry maternal and fetal risks. Also, the optimal anticoagulation regimen during pregnancy after MVR remains unclear. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies reporting on pregnancy after MVR. Valve- and anticoagulation-related maternal and fetal risks during pregnancy and 30 days’ postpartum were analyzed. Results: Fifteen studies reporting 722 pregnancies were included. In total, 87.2% of pregnant women had a mechanical prosthesis and 12.5% a bioprosthesis. Maternal mortality risk was 1.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.56), any hemorrhage risk 6.90% (95% CI, 3.70-12.88). Valve thrombosis risk was 4.71% (95% CI, 3.06-7.26) in patients with mechanical prostheses. 3.23% (95% CI, 1.34-7.75) of the patients with bioprostheses experienced early structural valve deterioration. Of these, the mortality was 40%. Pregnancy loss risk was 29.29% (95% CI, 19.74-43.47) with mechanical prostheses versus 13.50% (95% CI, 4.31-42.30) for bioprostheses. Switching to heparin during the first trimester demonstrated a bleeding risk of 7.78% (95% CI, 3.71-16.31) versus 4.08% (95% CI, 1.17-14.28) for women on oral anticoagulants throughout pregnancy and a valve thrombosis risk of 6.99% (95% CI, 2.08-23.51) versus 2.89% (95% CI, 1.40-5.94). Administration of anticoagulant dosages greater than 5 mg resulted in a risk of fetal adverse events of 74.24% (95% CI, 56.11-98.23) versus 8.85% (95% CI, 2.70-28.99) in ≤5 mg. Conclusions: A bioprosthesis seems the best option for women of childbearing age who are interested in future pregnancy after MVR. If mechanical valve replacement is preferred, the favorable anticoagulation regimen is continuous low-dose oral anticoagulants. Shared decision-making remains priority when choosing a prosthetic valve for young women.

Mohamed Omar Hassan,1 Lütfi Öcal,1 Mohamud Mire Waberi,1 Abdijalil Abdullahi Ali,2 Nasra Mohamud Hilowle,3 Said Abdirahman Ahmed1 1Department of Cardiology, Mogadishu Somali Turkish Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia; 2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mogadishu Somali Turkish Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia; 3Department Anesthesia and Reanimation, Mogadishu Somali Turkish Training and Research Hospital, Mogadishu, SomaliaCorrespondence: Said Abdirahman Ahmed, Tel +252615583381, Email saciidcabdi114@gmail.comIntroduction and Importance: A pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricle (LV) is a partial cardiac rupture surrounded by a pericardium that retains a connection with the LV lumen.Case Presentation: We present here a 30-year-old patient who came to our clinic for a routine check-up with no symptoms or complaints. After performing echocardiography, the patient’s echocardiography demonstrated a left ventricular pseudo-aneurysm which had collected a massive amount of thrombus. Three years earlier, the patient had a left atrial myxoma excision with mechanical mitral valve replacement following a presentation with shortness of breath.Clinical discussion: Left ventricular pseudo-aneurysm is a hazardous complication of mostly myocardial infraction and certain cardiac procedures, such as mitral valve replacement, where it may lead to thrombus formation. Due to this condition’s serious risk of lethal rupture and embolization from thrombus formation, as in our case, immediate surgical intervention is essential for its treatment.Conclusion: Left ventricular pseudo-aneurysm is an abnormal finding post-cardiac surgery, and it should be considered during patient evaluation after the surgery immediately and later in life.Keywords: myxoma, pseudo-aneurysm, mitral valve, mechanical valve

Thrombosis of mechanical valve prostheses is a rare but dramatic complication of valve replacement, as it is often fatal. Inadequate anticoagulant therapy is often to blame. Clinical presentation is variable, and rapid hemodynamic deterioration is often present. We report a case of mechanical valve thrombosis in the mitral position, in a 40-year-old patient admitted to the emergency department with cardiogenic shock. Thrombolysis was successfully performed. The evolution was marked by a clear hemodynamic improvement, with a follow-up echocardiogram showing normalization of the transmitral gradient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The choice between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) among patients aged 50-70 years is controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes of patients using bioprosthetic or mechanical valves to provide clinical evidence for valve selection. Methods: From 2002 to 2007, patients aged 50-70 years who underwent isolated AVR or MVR at the Fuwai Hospital were enrolled. After inverse probability-weighted (IPW) propensity balancing, we evaluated long-term mortality, stroke, and bleeding events between patients receiving mechanical and biological prostheses for MVR or AVR. Results: A total of 1639 patients were included in the study, including 1181 patients undergoing MVR (median follow-up: 11.6 years) and 458 patients undergoing AVR (median follow-up: 11.4 years). After IPW adjustment, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality and stroke rate between patients using bioprosthetic and mechanical valves for MVR [mortality: log-rank p = 0.802; stroke: log-rank p = 0.983] and AVR [mortality: log-rank p = 0.815; stroke: log-rank p = 0.537]. Landmark analysis at 12.5 years yielded significantly lower mortality in the patients receiving mechanical valves compared with bioprosthetic valves in the MVR cohort (p = 0.028). Patients receiving mechanical aortic valves displayed an increased risk of bleeding compared with those who received bioprosthetic aortic valves [Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence interval): 2.51 (1.06-5.93) p = 0.036]. Conclusions: For patients aged 50-70, there was no significant difference in overall long-term mortality between mechanical and bioprosthetic valve recipients. Patients receiving mechanical valves for MVR displayed lower mortality after 12.5 years follow-up. For AVR, bioprosthetic valves were associated with a lower risk of bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Valvular heart disease is a common disease often necessitating valve replacement. Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) are often used in younger patients because of their longer durability. Their main disadvantage is the need for lifelong anticoagulation. Warfarin is considered a standard treatment, but it is far from perfect. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a new and more patient-friendly alternative to warfarin when anticoagulation is required, but have not yet been approved for the indication of mechanical valves. Evidence acquisition: A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Cochrane Library (from inception to May 2023) was performed using a search string that was well defined and not modified during the study. An extensive overview of the search terms used in each database can be found in the Appendix. Only prospective clinical trials were included in this review. A total of 10 publications were included in this review. Relevance to clinical practice: This systematic review summarizes the different types of DOACs and their possible use in the anticoagulation of mechanical valves. We aim to propose future directions in anticoagulation research for mechanical valves. Conclusions: DOAC use in MHVs has been halted due to the failure of both dabigatran and apixaban in two major clinical trials. However, rivaroxaban was successful in two small clinical trials. Ample research is still needed to explore new valve designs as well as new anticoagulation targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There has been a resurgence in interest regarding the Ross procedure due to recent publications detailing positive long-term outcomes. Conversely, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a pulmonary homograft (PH), mechanical (MV), bioprosthetic (BV), or the Ozaki procedure each has its own technical advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing other alternatives to Ross procedure. Methods: Medical databases were comprehensively searched for studies comparing the Ross procedure with AVR using a PH, MV, BV, or the Ozaki procedure. Outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: A total of 7816 patients were pooled for our NMA from 24 studies. Compared to Ross procedure, both BV and MV were associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality of RR (2.37, 95% CI 1.20–4.67) and (1.88 95% CI 1.04–3.40), respectively, with no significant difference regarding PH or Ozaki. However, only MV was associated with a higher risk of 30-day stroke (RR 8.42, 95% CI 1.57–45.23) with no significant difference in the other alternatives, as well as 30-day MI which showed no significant differences between any of the aortic conduits compared to the Ross procedure. Regarding 30-day major bleeding, MV was associated with a higher when compared to the Ross procedure RR (4.58, 95% CI 1.94–10.85), PH was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding with RR (0.35, 95% CI 0.17–0.71), and BV showed no significant difference. With a mean follow-up duration of 8.5 years compared to the Ross procedure, BV, PH, and MV were associated with a higher risk of long-term mortality with RR (1.89, 95% CI 1.38–2.58), (1.38, 95% CI 1.0–1.87), and (1.94, 95% CI 1.52–2.47), respectively, with the Ozaki procedure showed no significant difference. Regarding long-term stroke—with a mean of 6.3-year follow-up duration—there were no significant differences between any of the aortic conduits compared to the Ross procedure. Nevertheless, long-term need for reintervention—with a mean follow-up duration of 17.5 years—was significant of higher risk with both BV and PH with RR (3.28, 95% CI 1.21–8.84) and (2.42, 95% CI 1.05–5.58), respectively, compared to Ross procedure with MV and Ozaki having no significant difference. Conclusions: The Ross procedure is a viable treatment option for patients undergoing SAVR, showing promising outcomes at short- and long-term follow-ups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prosthesis choice during aortic valve replacement (AVR) weighs lifelong anticoagulation with mechanical valves (M-AVR) against structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic valves (B-AVR). The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients who underwent isolated surgical AVR between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, stratifying by prothesis type. Propensity score matching was used to compare risk-adjusted outcomes. Readmission at 1 y was estimated with Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis. Patients (n = 109,744) who underwent AVR (90,574 B-AVR and 19,170 M-AVR) were included. B-AVR patients were older (median 68 versus 57 y; P < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (mean Elixhauser score: 11.8 versus 10.7; P < 0.001) compared to M-AVR patients. After matching (n = 36,951), there was no difference in age (58 versus 57 y; P = 0.6) and Elixhauser score (11.0 versus 10.8; P = 0.3). B-AVR patients had similar in-hospital mortality (2.3% versus 2.3%; P = 0.9) and cost (mean: $50,958 versus $51,200; P = 0.4) compared with M-AVR patients. However, B-AVR patients had shorter length of stay (8.3 versus 8.7 d; P < 0.001) and fewer readmissions at 30 d (10.3% versus 12.6%; P < 0.001) and 90 d (14.8% versus 17.8%; P < 0.001), and 1 y (P < 0.001, KM analysis). Patients undergoing B-AVR were less likely to be readmitted for bleeding or coagulopathy (5.7% versus 9.9%; P < 0.001) and effusions (9.1% versus 11.9%; P < 0.001). B-AVR patients had similar early outcomes compared to M-AVR patients, but lower rates of readmission. Bleeding, coagulopathy, and effusions are drivers of excess readmissions in M-AVR patients. Readmission reduction strategies targeting bleeding and improved anticoagulation management are warranted in the first year following AVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mechanical prosthetic heart valves, though more durable than bioprostheses, are more thrombogenic and require lifelong anticoagulation. Mechanical valve dysfunction can be caused by 4 main phenomena: 1) thrombosis; 2) fibrotic pannus ingrowth; 3) degeneration; and 4) endocarditis. Mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT) is a known complication with clinical presentation ranging from incidental imaging finding to cardiogenic shock. Thus, a high index of suspicion and expedited evaluation are essential. Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, cine-fluoroscopy, and computed tomography, is commonly used to diagnose MVT and follow treatment response. Although surgery is oftentimes required for obstructive MVT, other guideline-recommended therapies include parenteral anticoagulation and thrombolysis. Transcatheter manipulation of stuck mechanical valve leaflet is another treatment option for those with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or prohibitive surgical risk or as a bridge to surgery. The optimal strategy depends on degree of valve obstruction and the patient's comorbidities and hemodynamic status on presentation. [Display omitted] • The clinical presentation of mechanical valve thrombosis can range from an incidental finding in an asymptomatic patient to cardiogenic shock. • Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, cine-fluoroscopy and CT, is commonly used to establish the diagnosis. • Guideline-recommended treatments include heparin anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and surgery. Transcatheter manipulation of immobile leaflets can be pursued when thrombolytic or surgical risk is prohibitive or as a bridge to surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, correlation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and COVID-19 infection has been well established. Increased inflammatory response in the setting of COVID-19 infection is associated with VTE and hypercoagulability. Venous and arterial thrombotic events in COVID-19 infection have been well documented; however, few cases have been reported involving cardiac valve prostheses. In this review, we present a total of eight cases involving COVID-19-related prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT), as identified in a systematic review. These eight cases describe valve position (mitral versus aortic) and prosthesis type (bioprosthetic versus mechanical), and all cases demonstrate incidents of PVT associated with simultaneous or recent COVID-19 infection. None of these eight cases display obvious non-adherence to anticoagulation; five of the cases occurred greater than three years after the most recent valve replacement. Our review offers insights into PVT in COVID-19 infected patients including an indication for increased monitoring in the peri-infectious period. We explore valve thrombosis as a mechanism for prosthetic valve failure. We describe potential differences in antithrombotic strategies that may offer added antithrombotic protection during COVID-19 infection. With the growing population of valve replacement patients and recurring COVID-19 infection surges, it is imperative to explore relationships between COVID-19 and PVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to the modified World Health Organization (WHO) classification, pregnant women with mechanical valves face a very high risk of complications (Risk Category III). Mechanical valve thrombosis is a serious complication that significantly increases during pregnancy due to multiple mechanisms. Thrombolytic therapy has recently been used as a first-line treatment for mechanical valve thrombosis during pregnancy. However, the consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy, type, dose and route of administration was unclear. We present three cases of mechanical mitral valve thrombosis during pregnancy treated successfully with repeated doses of ultraslow infusion of low-dose tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) alteplase. We also present a review of the literature on this subject.

The presence of mechanical heart valves in both aortic and mitral positions is a significant limitation for traditional left ventricular (LV) access, including retrograde transaortic and/or antegrade interatrial transseptal routes. We present a case of successful catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia via a traditional transfemoral venous approach, which involves direct puncture of the inferior and medial aspect of the right atrium adjacent to the posteroseptal process of LV (PSPLV). Percutaneous trans‐right atrial access to the left ventricle appears to be a safe and feasible method for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with mechanical aortic and mitral valves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Structural valve failure in the form of leaflet fracture and embolization is an uncommon complication. Severe valve regurgitation with pulmonary oedema in a patient with a history of a prosthetic cardiac valve requires urgent diagnosis. An echocardiogram is essential in identifying the cause of valve failure. Case presentation We report a case of a 21-year-old male patient who presented with acute pulmonary oedema due to fracture and embolization of a leaflet of an On-X mitral valve four years post-implant. He underwent an emergency redo mitral valve replacement with a good outcome. Conclusions Structural valve failure with leaflet fracture and embolization is an extremely rare complication and may be fatal. Good clinical acumen is required for prompt diagnosis in any patient who presents with a circulatory collapse in the presence of a history of previous cardiac surgery. Once the diagnosis is made, the patient should undergo emergency redo valve replacement surgery.

Prosthetic valves are increasingly encountered in clinical practice. A grasp of the intricacies of the assessment and management of prosthetic valves is thus a crucial skillset for the practicing cardiologist. Echocardiography is the imaging modality of choice for the anatomic and functional evaluation of prosthetic valve. This document reviews the general features of prosthetic valves, echocardiographic identification of normally functioning and dysfunctional prosthetic valves as well as echocardiographic diagnosis of specific prosthetic valvular abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. To study the long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological valve prostheses in native mitral valve infective endocarditis patients. Desing. We conducted a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study with patients aged ≤70 years who were treated with mitral valve replacement for native mitral valve infective endocarditis in Finland between 2004 and 2017. Results. The endpoints were all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mitral valve reoperations. The results were adjusted for baseline features (age, gender, comorbidities, history of drug abuse, concomitant surgeries, operational urgency, and surgical center). The median follow-up time was 6.1 years. The 12-year cumulative mortality rates were 36% for mechanical prostheses and 74% for biological prostheses (adj. HR 0.40; CI: 0.17–0.91; p = 0.03). At follow-up, the ischemic stroke had occurred in 19% of patients with mechanical prosthesis and 33% of those with a biological prosthesis (adj. p = 0.52). The major bleeding rates within the 12-year follow-up period were 30% for mechanical prosthesis and 13% for a biological prosthesis (adj. p = 0.29). The mitral valve reoperation rates were 13% for mechanical prosthesis and 12% for a biological prosthesis (adj. p = 0.50). Drug abuse history did not have a significant modifying impact on the results (interaction p = 0.51 for mortality and ≥0.13 for secondary outcomes). Conclusion. The use of mechanical mitral valve prosthesis is associated with lower long-term mortality compared to the biological prosthesis in non-elder native mitral valve infective endocarditis patients. The routine choice of biological mitral valve prostheses for this patient group is not supported by the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aortic interventions remain the most effective treatment for severe aortic stenosis. In the recent years, advances in bioprosthetics and newer data have reduced the cut-off age for the use of bioprosthetic valves in younger patients, but the debate on whether to favor mechanical valves in younger patients remains a constant, especially with the undesired effects and considerations of anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists in this age group. Other options like the Ross procedure are gaining traction, despite still being undervalued and necessitating expertise centers. Hemodynamic considerations and durability of these options are important to consider, especially in this age group. Regardless of the choice of the prosthesis, patient informed consent is paramount since the decision affects the lifetime management of their initial condition, and expectations given must remain realistic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is common in the setting of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair. Here, we evaluated the association between prosthesis choice and patient outcomes in an international patient cohort. We reviewed data from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) interventional cohort to examine the relationship between valve choice and short- and mid-term patient outcomes. Between January 1996 and March 2016, 1290 surgically treated patients with TAAD were entered into the IRAD interventional cohort. Of those, 364 patients undergoing TAAD repair underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR; mean age, 57 years). The mechanical valve cohort consisted of 189 patients, of which 151 (79.9%) had a root replacement. The nonmechanical valve cohort consisted of 5 patients who received homografts and 160 patients who received a biologic AVR, with a total of 118 (71.5%) patients who underwent root replacements. The mean follow-up time was 2.92 ± 1.75 years overall (2.46 ± 1.69 years for the mechanical valve cohort and 3.48 ± 1.8 years for the nonmechanical valve cohort). After propensity matching, Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year survival rates after surgery were 64.8% in the mechanical valve group compared with 74.7% in the nonmechanical valve group (p = 0.921). A stratified Cox model for 4-year mortality showed no difference in hazard between valve types after adjusting for the propensity score (p = 0.854). A biologic valve is a reasonable option in patients with TAAD who require AVR. Although this option avoids the potential risks of anticoagulation, long-term follow up is necessary to assess the effect of reoperations or transcatheter interventions for structural valve degeneration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Structural valve failure in the form of leaflet fracture and embolization is an uncommon complication. Severe valve regurgitation with pulmonary oedema in a patient with a history of a prosthetic cardiac valve requires urgent diagnosis. An echocardiogram is essential in identifying the cause of valve failure. Case presentation: We report a case of a 21-year-old male patient who presented with acute pulmonary oedema due to fracture and embolization of a leaflet of an On-X mitral valve four years post-implant. He underwent an emergency redo mitral valve replacement with a good outcome. Conclusions: Structural valve failure with leaflet fracture and embolization is an extremely rare complication and may be fatal. Good clinical acumen is required for prompt diagnosis in any patient who presents with a circulatory collapse in the presence of a history of previous cardiac surgery. Once the diagnosis is made, the patient should undergo emergency redo valve replacement surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients who need a prosthetic aortic heart valve may decide, working with their cardiologist and cardiac surgeon, among a variety of options: surgical or transcatheter approach, bioprosthetic or mechanical valve, or a Ross procedure if suitable to their age and anatomy. This review article examines the evidence for survival benefit with mechanical aortic valves, discusses bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration and its consequences, and considers the risks of redo aortic valve surgery or subsequent valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter intervention. It highlights the unique characteristics of the On-X aortic valve, including the US Food and Drug Administration approved and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline supported reduced anticoagulation target INR of 1.5 to 2.0, and discusses the PROACT Xa trial comparing apixaban vs warfarin anticoagulation. The choice of prosthetic valve should be individualized, carefully considering each patient's unique circumstances. In that context, the On-X aortic valve offers a potential lifetime solution without need for a repeat operation, while minimizing the risks of long-term anticoagulation. In an era of enthusiasm for bioprosthetic and transcatheter-based approaches, the option of a second-generation bileaflet mechanical valve with optimized hemodynamics-the On-X aortic valve-may well align with patient expectations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve replacement with reserved subvalvular structure is an effective method for the treatment of valvular heart disease. The selection of prosthetic valve material plays an important role. OBJECTIVE: To explore application effect of biological mitral valve replacement in elderly patients with valvular heart disease. METHODS: Clinical data of 96 elderly patients with valvular heart disease who received mitral valve replacement from May 2017 to April 2019 in The 7th People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou were retrospectively analyzed. According to their conditions and wishes, the patients were divided into biological group (n=62) and mechanical group (n=34). The biological group received mitral valve replacement with reserved subvalvular structure biological valve. The mechanical group received mitral valve replacement with reserved subvalvular structure mechanical valve. Cardiac function, clinical efficacy, serum inflammatory factors, hemodynamics, and complications were compared between the two groups. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The 7th People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou (approval No. 20170315). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) In follow-up for 12 months, New York Heart Association class I was 71%, and clinical success rate was 77% in the biological group. New York Heart Association class I was 47%, and clinical success rate was 53% in the mechanical group. There was significant difference of New York Heart Association class I and clinical success rate between two groups (P < 0.05). There were no cases of reoperation or death caused by structural failure of artificial valve in the two groups. The thromboembolism, endocarditis and perivalvular leakage were lower in the biological group than those in the mechanical group (P < 0.05). (2) At 3 days after surgery, mass concentrations of serum interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor α were lower in the biological group than those in the mechanical group (P < 0.05). The mass concentration of serum interleukin 10 was higher in the biological group than that in the mechanical group (P < 0.05). (3) In follow-up for 12 months, early diastolic inflow velocity and maximun transvalvular pressure gradient were lower in the biological group than those in the mechanical group (P < 0.05). Effective orifice area was higher in the biological group than that in the mechanical group (P < 0.05). (4) The results show that biovalvular mitral valve replacement helps to improve cardiac function of elderly patients with heart valve disease, increases the clinical success rate, and reduces complications, which may be associated with antagonistic inflammatory stress response and improving hemodynamics [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]