Search

Over the past decades, tremendous technological advances have emerged in human motion analysis (HMA). How has technology for analysing human motion evolved over the past decades, and what clinical applications has it enabled? The literature on HMA has been extensively reviewed, focusing on three main approaches: Fully-Instrumented Gait Analysis (FGA), Wearable Sensor Analysis (WSA), and Deep-Learning Video Analysis (DVA), considering both technical and clinical aspects. FGA techniques relying on data collected using stereophotogrammetric systems, force plates, and electromyographic sensors have been dramatically improved providing highly accurate estimates of the biomechanics of motion. WSA techniques have been developed with the advances in data collection at home and in community settings. DVA techniques have emerged through artificial intelligence, which has marked the last decade. Some authors have considered WSA and DVA techniques as alternatives to "traditional" HMA techniques. They have suggested that WSA and DVA techniques are destined to replace FGA. We argue that FGA, WSA, and DVA complement each other and hence should be accounted as "synergistic" in the context of modern HMA and its clinical applications. We point out that DVA techniques are especially attractive as screening techniques, WSA methods enable data collection in the home and community for extensive periods of time, and FGA does maintain superior accuracy and should be the preferred technique when a complete and highly accurate biomechanical data is required. Accordingly, we envision that future clinical applications of HMA would favour screening patients using DVA in the outpatient setting. If deemed clinically appropriate, then WSA would be used to collect data in the home and community to derive relevant information. If accurate kinetic data is needed, then patients should be referred to specialized centres where an FGA system is available, together with medical imaging and thorough clinical assessments. • Gait analysis by stereophotogrammetry provides highly accurate biomechanics of motion. • Wearable sensors enable ecological data collection at home and in community setting. • Deep-learning video analysis can perform motion capture without instruments on subjects. • Several authors suggest more modern technologies shall replace traditional gait analysis. • We argue that these three technologies complement each other and shall be "synergistic". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract This study aimed to analyze the effect of laterality and instructional video on the soccer goalkeepers’ dive kinematics in penalty. Eight goalkeepers from youth categories (U15, U17, U20) were randomly divided into control (CG) and video instruction groups (VG). The latter performed 20 penalty defense trials on the field with balls launched by a machine, ten before and after watching a video instruction to improve the diving kinematics. The CG only performed the dives. Three cameras recorded the collections. A markerless motion capture technique (OpenPose) was used for identification and tracking of joints and anatomical references on video. The pose data were used for 3D reconstruction. In the post-instruction situation, the VG presented differences in comparison to the CG in the: knee flexion/extension angle, time to reach peak resultant velocity, frontal step distance, and frontal departure angle, which generated greater acceleration during the dive. Non-dominant leg side dives had higher resultant velocity during 88.4 – 100% of the diving cycle, different knee flexion/extension angle, and higher values ​​in the frontal step distance. The instructional video generated an acute change in the diving movement pattern of young goalkeepers when comparing the control and the video instruction group in the post condition.

Background: In radiotherapy, real‐time tumor tracking can verify tumor position during beam delivery, guide the radiation beam to target the tumor, and reduce the chance of a geometric miss. Markerless kV x‐ray image‐based tumor tracking is challenging due to the low tumor visibility caused by tumor‐obscuring structures. Developing a new method to enhance tumor visibility for real‐time tumor tracking is essential. Purpose: To introduce a novel method for markerless kV image‐based tracking of lung tumors via deep learning‐based target decomposition. Methods: We utilized a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN), known as Pix2Pix, to build a patient‐specific model and generate the synthetic decomposed target image (sDTI) to enhance tumor visibility on the real‐time kV projection images acquired by the onboard kV imager equipped on modern linear accelerators. We used 4DCT simulation images to generate the digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and DTI image pairs for model training. We augmented the training dataset by randomly shifting the 4DCT in the superior‐inferior, anterior‐posterior, and left‐right directions during the DRR and DTI generation process. We performed real‐time 2D tumor tracking via template matching between the DTI generated from the CT simulation and the sDTI generated from the real‐time kV projection images. We validated the proposed method using nine patients' datasets with implanted beacons near the tumor. Results: The sDTI can effectively improve the image contrast around the lung tumors on the kV projection images for the nine patients. With the beacon motion as ground truth, the tracking errors were on average 0.8 ± 0.7 mm in the superior‐inferior (SI) direction and 0.9 ± 0.8 mm in the in‐plane left‐right (IPLR) direction. The percentage of successful tracking, defined as a tracking error less than 2 mm in the SI direction, is 92.2% on the 4312 tested images. The patient‐specific model took approximately 12 h to train. During testing, it took approximately 35 ms to generate one sDTI, and 13 ms to perform the tumor tracking using template matching. Conclusions: Our method offers the potential solution for nearly real‐time markerless lung tumor tracking. It achieved a high level of accuracy and an impressive tracking rate. Further development of 3D lung tumor tracking is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Marker-based 3D motion capture systems, widely used for gait analysis, are accurate but have disadvantages such as cost and accessibility. Whereas markerless pose estimation has emerged as a convenient and cost-effective alternative for gait analysis, challenges remain in achieving optimal accuracy. Given the limited research on the effects of camera location and orientation on data collection accuracy, this study investigates how camera placement affects gait assessment accuracy utilizing five smartphones. This study aimed to explore the differences in data collection accuracy between marker-based systems and pose estimation, as well as to assess the impact of camera location and orientation on accuracy in pose estimation. The results showed that the differences in joint angles between pose estimation and marker-based systems are below 5°, an acceptable level for gait analysis, with a strong correlation between the two datasets supporting the effectiveness of pose estimation in gait analysis. In addition, hip and knee angles were accurately measured at the front diagonal of the subject and ankle angle at the lateral side. This research highlights the significance of careful camera placement for reliable gait analysis using pose estimation, serving as a concise reference to guide future efforts in enhancing the quantitative accuracy of gait analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of using the diaphragm as a surrogate for liver targets during MDTT. Methods: Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: a dome‐shaped phantom with implanted markers was fabricated and underwent dual‐orthogonal fluoroscopy sequences on the Vero4DRT linac. Ten patients participated in an IRB‐approved, feasibility study to assess the MDTT workflow. All images were analyzed using an in‐house program to back‐project the diaphragm/markers position to the isocenter plane. ExacTrac imager log files were analyzed. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: The phantom "diaphragm" was contoured as a markerless tracking structure (MTS) and exported to Vero4DRT/ExacTrac. A single field plan was delivered to the phantom film plane under static and MDTT conditions. In the patient study, the diaphragm tracking structure was contoured on CT breath‐hold‐exhale datasets. The MDTT workflow was applied until just prior to MV beam‐on. Results: Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: phantom data confirmed the in‐house 3D back‐projection program was functioning as intended. In patients, the diaphragm/marker relative positions had a mean ± RMS difference of 0.70 ± 0.89, 1.08 ± 1.26, and 0.96 ± 1.06 mm in ML, SI, and AP directions. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: Building a respiratory‐correlation model using the diaphragm as surrogate for the implanted markers was successful in phantom/patients. During the tracking verification imaging step, the phantom mean ± SD difference between the image‐detected and predicted "diaphragm" position was 0.52 ± 0.18 mm. The 2D film gamma (2%/2 mm) comparison (static to MDTT deliveries) was 98.2%. In patients, the mean difference between the image‐detected and predicted diaphragm position was 2.02 ± 0.92 mm. The planning target margin contribution from MDTT diaphragm tracking is 2.2, 5.0, and 4.7 mm in the ML, SI, and AP directions. Conclusion: In phantom/patients, the diaphragm motion correlated well with markers' motion and could be used as a surrogate. MDTT workflows using the diaphragm as the MTS is feasible using the Vero4DRT linac and could replace the need for implanted markers for liver radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Movement research has typically been performed using three-dimensional (3D) marker-based motion capture, which is considered the “gold-standard” for biomechanical assessment. However, limitations exist due to the lack of portability, extensive preparation for data collection, marker placement training, error due to marker movement, and possible skin irritation due to marker adhesives. There is inherent error due to motion artifact stemming from skin movement and differences in marker placement between testers. Markerless motion capture systems are emerging as a new method of kinematic assessment. These methods require little preparation and there is no need to alter participant clothing. Markerless motion capture has also been validated for the lower extremity in healthy older adults during gait. However, it has not been validated for other populations or for the assessment of upper extremity (UE) motion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine differences in calculated UE kinematics between marker-based and a markerless motion capture system. Participants attended two data collection sessions. Marker-based and markerless motion capture data was collected simultaneously while participants completed the Box and Blocks test (BBT). Kinematic and spatiotemporal data from both systems was exported using identical time series to ensure the same conditions for comparisons. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine between session reliability for both systems on range of motion and peak joint angular data to ensure movement variability was not affecting measurement consistency. ICCs and Bland Altman statistics were also calculated between the systems. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) values were determined between demeaned UE joint angles for the two systems to examine movement pattern differences. The resulting between-session ICCs for each system showed that the markerless system shared similar reliability during this task as the marker-based system, further supporting the effect of variability on between-session reliability. Between-system ICCs resulted in good (0.70.9) agreement. Bland Altman results confirmed the existence of measurement bias between the systems. RMSD values for all UE joint angles were found to be less than 6°. Overall, the results from this study support the use of markerless motion capture in clinical settings to examine upper extremity biomechanics in children.

During the transitional time between Covid-19 and endemic, all Indonesian schools, and SMKN 47 in particular, had restricted educational opportunities. Due to challenges encountered by the instructor and 36 students majoring in accounting in grade 12, they were unable to carry out teaching and learning activities at school; art lesson formats with three-dimensional learning modules must be visualized in 3D. However, with hybrid teaching and learning utilizing presentations, displaying the learned 3D forms is less successful. In order to visualize three dimensions in fine arts classes using augmented reality technology, we require a new learning medium. The application of the Markerless Based Tracking approach in this work enables the presentation of a tracked 3D model in the surrounding environment in real-time by merging the actual and virtual worlds as if their boundaries did not exist. The augmented reality system scans flat surfaces utilizing points, as opposed to markers or other auxiliary media. Points used as pedestals or containers to elevate three-dimensional items. There are three sculptures and three traditional dwellings on show. Online examination outcomes average resulted a 78.2% that the AR Fine Arts application by instructors and students are therefore consistent and well accepted.

Keberadaan toko online sebagai platform penjualan dianggap sangat penting dalam meningkatkan profit, terutama dengan perkembangan teknologi augmented reality (AR) yang dapat memperkaya proses promosi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan sebuah aplikasi Android yang memperlihatkan produk sepatu dalam format tiga dimensi menggunakan teknologi AR. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui observasi perilaku konsumen dalam berbelanja online dan penerapan teknologi AR. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Multimedia Development Life Cycle (MDLC). Aplikasi AR ini dibuat menggunakan Unity 3D dan dapat diakses di platform Android dengan menggunakan teknologi markerless, yang memungkinkan pengguna menggunakan objek dunia nyata sebagai marker tanpa perlu tambahan perangkat, sehingga meningkatkan fleksibilitas penggunaan aplikasi dan memastikan performa tinggi serta responsif. Hasil pengujian User Acceptance Testing (UAT) menunjukkan nilai rata-rata sebesar 87,19%, dengan kategori "sangat baik", maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa aplikasi AR ini memiliki potensi yang sangat baik untuk mendukung upaya promosi penjualan secara online.

Accuracy validation of gait analysis using pose estimation with artificial intelligence (AI) remains inadequate, particularly in objective assessments of absolute error and similarity of waveform patterns. This study aimed to clarify objective measures for absolute error and waveform pattern similarity in gait analysis using pose estimation AI (OpenPose). Additionally, we investigated the feasibility of simultaneous measuring both lower limbs using a single camera from one side. We compared motion analysis data from pose estimation AI using video footage that was synchronized with a three-dimensional motion analysis device. The comparisons involved mean absolute error (MAE) and the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) to compare the waveform pattern similarity. The MAE ranged from 2.3 to 3.1° on the camera side and from 3.1 to 4.1° on the opposite side, with slightly higher accuracy on the camera side. Moreover, the CMC ranged from 0.936 to 0.994 on the camera side and from 0.890 to 0.988 on the opposite side, indicating a "very good to excellent" waveform similarity. Gait analysis using a single camera revealed that the precision on both sides was sufficiently robust for clinical evaluation, while measurement accuracy was slightly superior on the camera side. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sports physiotherapists and coaches are tasked with evaluating the movement quality of athletes across the spectrum of ability and experience. However, the accuracy of visual observation is low and existing technology outside of expensive lab-based solutions has limited adoption, leading to an unmet need for an efficient and accurate means to measure static and dynamic joint angles during movement, converted to movement metrics useable by practitioners. This paper proposes a set of pose landmarks for computing frequently used joint angles as metrics of interest to sports physiotherapists and coaches in assessing common strength-building human exercise movements. It then proposes a set of rules for computing these metrics for a range of common exercises (single and double drop jumps and counter-movement jumps, deadlifts and various squats) from anatomical key-points detected using video, and evaluates the accuracy of these using a published 3D human pose model trained with ground truth data derived from VICON motion capture of common rehabilitation exercises. Results show a set of mathematically defined metrics which are derived from the chosen pose landmarks, and which are sufficient to compute the metrics for each of the exercises under consideration. Comparison to ground truth data showed that root mean square angle errors were within 10° for all exercises for the following metrics: shin angle, knee varus/valgus and left/right flexion, hip flexion and pelvic tilt, trunk angle, spinal flexion lower/upper/mid and rib flare. Larger errors (though still all within 15°) were observed for shoulder flexion and ASIS asymmetry in some exercises, notably front squats and drop-jumps. In conclusion, the contribution of this paper is that a set of sufficient key-points and associated metrics for exercise assessment from 3D human pose have been uniquely defined. Further, we found generally very good accuracy of the Strided Transformer 3D pose model in predicting these metrics for the chosen set of exercises from a single mobile device camera, when trained on a suitable set of functional exercises recorded using a VICON motion capture system. Future assessment of generalization is needed.

Introduction: Individuals with Parkinsonian disorders often face limited access to specialized physiotherapy and movement training due to staff shortages and increasing disease incidence, resulting in a rapid decline in mobility and feelings of despair. Addressing these challenges requires allocating adequate resources and implementing specialized training programs to ensure comprehensive care and support. Regarding these problems, a computer software was invented that might serve as an additional home-based extension to conventional physiotherapy. Methods: The trial took place in a rehabilitation center where every patient received equivalent treatment apart from the training program that was set up to be investigated over 3 weeks. Seventy four Patients were included and randomized between two intervention and one control group. Intervention group 1 (IG1) trained with the computer-based system two times a week while Intervention group 2 (IG2) received five training sessions a week. Using the markerless Microsoft Kinect® camera, participants controlled a digital avatar with their own body movements. UPDRS-III and Clinical measurements were performed before and after the three-week period. Results: Patients in all groups improved in UPDRS-III pre and post intervention whereas reduction rates were higher for IG1 (-10.89%) and IG2 (-14.04%) than for CG (-7.74%). Differences between the groups were not significant (value of ps CG/IG1 0.225, CG/IG2 0.347). Growth rates for the arm abduction angle were significantly higher in IG1 (11.6%) and IG2 (9.97%) than in CG (1.87%) (value of ps CG/IG1 0.006 and CG/IG2 0.018), as was the 5-steps-distance (CG 10.86% vs. IG1 24.5% vs. UG2 26.22%, value of ps CG/IG1 0.011 and CG/IG2 0.031). Discussion: The study shows the beneficial effects of computer-based training and substantiates the assumption of a similar impact in a home-based setting. The utilized software is feasible for such interventions and meets with the patient's approval. Group dynamics seem to have an additional supporting effect for the aspired objective of improving mobility and should be seen as an essential aspect of video games in therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gait analysis is an essential tool for detecting biomechanical irregularities, designing personalized rehabilitation plans, and enhancing athletic performance. Currently, gait assessment depends on either visual observation, which lacks consistency between raters and requires clinical expertise, or instrumented evaluation, which is costly, invasive, time-consuming, and requires specialized equipment and trained personnel. Markerless gait analysis using 2D pose estimation techniques has emerged as a potential solution, but it still requires significant computational resources and human involvement, making it challenging to use. This research proposes an automated method for temporal gait analysis that employs the MediaPipe Pose, a low-computational-resource pose estimation model. The study validated this approach against the Vicon motion capture system to evaluate its reliability. The findings reveal that this approach demonstrates good (ICC(2,1) > 0.75) to excellent (ICC(2,1) > 0.90) agreement in all temporal gait parameters except for double support time (right leg switched to left leg) and swing time (right), which only exhibit a moderate (ICC(2,1) > 0.50) agreement. Additionally, this approach produces temporal gait parameters with low mean absolute error. It will be useful in monitoring changes in gait and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions such as rehabilitation or training programs in the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In biomechanics, movement is typically recorded by tracking the trajectories of anatomical landmarks previously marked using passive instrumentation, which entails several inconveniences. To overcome these disadvantages, researchers are exploring different markerless methods, such as pose estimation networks, to capture movement with equivalent accuracy to marker-based photogrammetry. However, pose estimation models usually only provide joint centers, which are incomplete data for calculating joint angles in all anatomical axes. Recently, marker augmentation models based on deep learning have emerged. These models transform pose estimation data into complete anatomical data. Building on this concept, this study presents three marker augmentation models of varying complexity that were compared to a photogrammetry system. The errors in anatomical landmark positions and the derived joint angles were calculated, and a statistical analysis of the errors was performed to identify the factors that most influence their magnitude. The proposed Transformer model improved upon the errors reported in the literature, yielding position errors of less than 1.5 cm for anatomical landmarks and 4.4 degrees for all seven movements evaluated. Anthropometric data did not influence the errors, while anatomical landmarks and movement influenced position errors, and model, rotation axis, and movement influenced joint angle errors.

Marker-based 3D motion capture systems, widely used for gait analysis, are accurate but have disadvantages such as cost and accessibility. Whereas markerless pose estimation has emerged as a convenient and cost-effective alternative for gait analysis, challenges remain in achieving optimal accuracy. Given the limited research on the effects of camera location and orientation on data collection accuracy, this study investigates how camera placement affects gait assessment accuracy utilizing five smartphones. This study aimed to explore the differences in data collection accuracy between marker-based systems and pose estimation, as well as to assess the impact of camera location and orientation on accuracy in pose estimation. The results showed that the differences in joint angles between pose estimation and marker-based systems are below 5°, an acceptable level for gait analysis, with a strong correlation between the two datasets supporting the effectiveness of pose estimation in gait analysis. In addition, hip and knee angles were accurately measured at the front diagonal of the subject and ankle angle at the lateral side. This research highlights the significance of careful camera placement for reliable gait analysis using pose estimation, serving as a concise reference to guide future efforts in enhancing the quantitative accuracy of gait analysis.

Gait analysis plays an important role in the fields of healthcare and sports sciences. Conventional gait analysis relies on costly equipment such as optical motion capture cameras and wearable sensors, some of which require trained assessors for data collection and processing. With the recent developments in computer vision and deep neural networks, using monocular RGB cameras for 3D human pose estimation has shown tremendous promise as a cost-effective and efficient solution for clinical gait analysis. In this paper, a markerless human pose technique is developed using motion captured by a consumer monocular camera (800 × 600 pixels and 30 FPS) for clinical gait analysis. The experimental results have shown that the proposed post-processing algorithm significantly improved the original human pose detection model (BlazePose)'s prediction performance compared to the gold-standard gait signals by 10.7% using the MoVi dataset. In addition, the predicted T2 score has an excellent correlation with ground truth (r = 0.99 and y = 0.94x + 0.01 regression line), which supports that our approach can be a potential alternative to the conventional marker-based solution to assist the clinical gait assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With advancements in technology able to quantify wide-ranging features of human movement, the aim of the present study was to investigate the inter-device technological reliability of a three-dimensional markerless motion capture system (3D-MCS), quantifying different movement tasks. A total of 20 healthy individuals performed a test battery consisting of 29 different movements, from which 214 different metrics were derived. Two 3D-MCS located in close proximity were utilized to quantify movement characteristics. Independent sample t-tests with selected reliability statistics (i.e., intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), effect sizes, and mean absolute differences) were used to evaluate the agreement between the two systems. The study results suggested that 95.7% of all metrics analyzed revealed negligible or small between-device effect sizes. Further, 91.6% of all metrics analyzed showed moderate or better agreement when looking at the ICC values, while 32.2% of all metrics showed excellent agreement. For metrics measuring joint angles (198 metrics), the mean difference between systems was 2.9 degrees, while for metrics investigating distance measures (16 metrics; e.g., center of mass depth), the mean difference between systems was 0.62 cm. Caution is advised when trying to generalize the study findings beyond the specific technology and software used in this investigation. Given the technological reliability reported in this study, as well as the logistical and time-related limitations associated with marker-based motion capture systems, it may be suggested that 3D-MCS present practitioners with an opportunity to reliably and efficiently measure the movement characteristics of patients and athletes. This has implications for monitoring the health/performance of a broad range of populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Markerless motion capture systems (MCS) have been developed as an alternative solution to overcome the limitations of 3D MCS as they provide a more practical and efficient setup process given, among other factors, the lack of sensors attached to the body. However, this might affect the accuracy of the measures recorded. Thus, this study is aimed at evaluating the level of agreement between a markerless MSC (i.e., MotionMetrix) and an optoelectronic MCS (i.e., Qualisys). For such purpose, 24 healthy young adults were assessed for walking (at 5 km/h) and running (at 10 and 15 km/h) in a single session. The parameters obtained from MotionMetrix and Qualisys were tested in terms of level of agreement. When walking at 5 km/h, the MotionMetrix system significantly underestimated the stance and swing phases, as well as the load and pre-swing phases (p < 0.05) reporting also relatively low systematic bias (i.e., ≤ −0.03 s) and standard error of the estimate (SEE) (i.e., ≤0.02 s). The level of agreement between measurements was perfect (r > 0.9) for step length left and cadence and very large (r > 0.7) for step time left, gait cycle, and stride length. Regarding running at 10 km/h, bias and SEE analysis revealed significant differences for most of the variables except for stride time, rate and length, swing knee flexion for both legs, and thigh flexion left. The level of agreement between measurements was very large (r > 0.7) for stride time and rate, stride length, and vertical displacement. At 15 km/h, bias and SEE revealed significant differences for vertical displacement, landing knee flexion for both legs, stance knee flexion left, thigh flexion, and extension for both legs. The level of agreement between measurements in running at 15 km/h was almost perfect (r > 0.9) when comparing Qualisys and MotionMetrix parameters for stride time and rate, and stride length. The agreement between the two motion capture systems varied for different variables and speeds of locomotion, with some variables demonstrating high agreement while others showed poor agreement. Nonetheless, the findings presented here suggest that the MotionMetrix system is a promising option for sports practitioners and clinicians interested in measuring gait variables, particularly in the contexts examined in the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Within the theoretical framework of embodied cognition, several experiments have shown the existence of links between action observation and motor learning. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of an observational learning protocol (action observation training: AOT) of point-light-display (PLD) in judoka. Twenty participants were given 7 days to learn Go-No-Sen. During this time period, all of the participants received conventional kata training consisting of Uchi-komi and Nage-komi (repetition of techniques) on tatami. In addition to this conventional learning, the experimental group watched 5 min of PLD video representing the different kata techniques, whereas the control group watched neutral videos during the same time period. After the learning period, both the qualitative and biomechanical performances on the kata and the transfer abilities were assessed. The results showed better biomechanical performance and transfer ability in the experimental group than in the control group. Therefore, this first experiment suggests that observational learning of PLD may be beneficial for the acquisition of judo techniques. Future experiments will be needed to specify the mechanisms that are involved in this effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study used stick model augmentation on single-camera motion video to create a markerless motion classification model of manual operations. All videos were augmented with a stick model composed of keypoints and lines by using the programming model, which later incorporated the COCO dataset, OpenCV and OpenPose modules to estimate the coordinates and body joints. The stick model data included the initial velocity, cumulative velocity, and acceleration for each body joint. The extracted motion vector data were normalized using three different techniques, and the resulting datasets were subjected to eight classifiers. The experiment involved four distinct motion sequences performed by eight participants. The random forest classifier performed the best in terms of accuracy in recorded data classification in its min-max normalized dataset. This classifier also obtained a score of 81.80% for the dataset before random subsampling and a score of 92.37% for the resampled dataset. Meanwhile, the random subsampling method dramatically improved classification accuracy by removing noise data and replacing them with replicated instances to balance the class. This research advances methodological and applied knowledge on the capture and classification of human motion using a single camera view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accuracy validation of gait analysis using pose estimation with artificial intelligence (AI) remains inadequate, particularly in objective assessments of absolute error and similarity of waveform patterns. This study aimed to clarify objective measures for absolute error and waveform pattern similarity in gait analysis using pose estimation AI (OpenPose). Additionally, we investigated the feasibility of simultaneous measuring both lower limbs using a single camera from one side. We compared motion analysis data from pose estimation AI using video footage that was synchronized with a three-dimensional motion analysis device. The comparisons involved mean absolute error (MAE) and the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) to compare the waveform pattern similarity. The MAE ranged from 2.3 to 3.1° on the camera side and from 3.1 to 4.1° on the opposite side, with slightly higher accuracy on the camera side. Moreover, the CMC ranged from 0.936 to 0.994 on the camera side and from 0.890 to 0.988 on the opposite side, indicating a “very good to excellent” waveform similarity. Gait analysis using a single camera revealed that the precision on both sides was sufficiently robust for clinical evaluation, while measurement accuracy was slightly superior on the camera side.

Cerebral palsy, the most common childhood neuromotor disorder, is often diagnosed through visual assessment of general movements (GM) in infancy. This skill requires extensive training and is thus difficult to implement on a large scale. Automated analysis of GM performed using low-cost instrumentation in the home may be used to estimate quantitative metrics predictive of movement disorders. This study explored if infants' GM may be successfully evaluated in a familiar environment by processing the 3D trajectories of points of interest (PoI) obtained from recordings of a single commercial RGB-D sensor. The RGB videos were processed using an open-source markerless motion tracking method which allowed the estimation of the 2D trajectories of the selected PoI and a purposely developed method which allowed the reconstruction of their 3D trajectories making use of the data recorded with the depth sensor. Eight infants' GM were recorded in the home at 3, 4, and 5 months of age. Eight GM metrics proposed in the literature in addition to a novel metric were estimated from the PoI trajectories at each timepoint. A pediatric neurologist and physiatrist provided an overall clinical evaluation from infants' video. Subsequently, a comparison between metrics and clinical evaluation was performed. The results demonstrated that GM metrics may be meaningfully estimated and potentially used for early identification of movement disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Institut Teknologi Sumatera is a public university in the province of Lampung. Institut Teknologi Sumatera (ITERA) has many buildings, including Gedung Kuliah Umum (GKU). GKU is the largest and widest lecture building in ITERA. GKU has four floors, where each floor has many rooms in it with different functions in each room. As the largest building in ITERA, GKU is often used for various events, including CPNS exams, new student admissions, or for visits from other campuses. Due to the size of this building, this allows visitors from outside ITERA to GKU to experience problems in terms of time to ask questions and difficulty finding various spaces in the GKU Building. This research uses Augmented Reality technology to help make it easier for visitors from outside ITERA to find space quickly and precisely. In its development using several tools, including the ARWaKit SDK. This framework is used on devices with the IoS operating system. In its implementation, it requires a camera on a smartphone to capture existing images and convert them into cyberspace. In the ARWayKit framework, Azure Spatial Anchors have been used which can be used to carry out the mapping process as a markerless method and to optimize the distance from the user's position to the destination location, the a-star algorithm is used. The results obtained from the Variation-2 test were 91.6%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gait analysis is an essential tool for detecting biomechanical irregularities, designing personalized rehabilitation plans, and enhancing athletic performance. Currently, gait assessment depends on either visual observation, which lacks consistency between raters and requires clinical expertise, or instrumented evaluation, which is costly, invasive, time-consuming, and requires specialized equipment and trained personnel. Markerless gait analysis using 2D pose estimation techniques has emerged as a potential solution, but it still requires significant computational resources and human involvement, making it challenging to use. This research proposes an automated method for temporal gait analysis that employs the MediaPipe Pose, a low-computational-resource pose estimation model. The study validated this approach against the Vicon motion capture system to evaluate its reliability. The findings reveal that this approach demonstrates good (ICC(2,1) > 0.75) to excellent (ICC(2,1) > 0.90) agreement in all temporal gait parameters except for double support time (right leg switched to left leg) and swing time (right), which only exhibit a moderate (ICC(2,1) > 0.50) agreement. Additionally, this approach produces temporal gait parameters with low mean absolute error. It will be useful in monitoring changes in gait and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions such as rehabilitation or training programs in the community.

Background: Combining the accuracy of marker-based stereophotogrammetry and the usability and comfort of markerless human movement analysis is a difficult challenge. 3D temporal scanners are a promising solution, since they provide moving meshes with thousands of vertices that can be used to analyze human movements.Research Question: Can a 3D temporal scanner be used as a markerless system for gait analysis with the same accuracy as traditional, marker-based stereophotogrammetry systems?Methods: A comparative study was carried out using a 3D temporal scanner synchronized with a marker-based stereophotogrammetry system. Two gait cycles of twelve healthy adults were measured simultaneously, extracting the positions of key anatomical points from both systems, and using them to analyze the 3D kinematics of the pelvis, right hip and knee joints. Measurement differences of marker positions and joint angles were described by their root mean square. A t-test was performed to rule out instrumental errors, and an F-test to evaluate the amplifications of marker position errors in dynamic conditions.Results: The differences in 3D landmark positions were between 1.9 and 2.4 mm in the reference pose. Marker position errors were significantly increased during motion in the medial-lateral and vertical directions. The angle relative errors were between 3% and 43% of the range of motion, with the greatest difference being observed in hip axial rotation.Significance: The differences in the results obtained between the 3D temporal scanner and the marker-based system were smaller than the usual errors due to lack of accuracy in the manual positioning of markers on anatomical landmarks and to soft-tissue artefacts. That level of accuracy is greater than other markerless systems, and proves that such technology is a good alternative to traditional, marker-based motion capture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The interior is something that has always been a necessity for the community, but not a few people do not understand the shape and design of the furniture itself, the people themselves can only imagine about the shape of the furniture because they have never seen the model firsthand, so people sometimes don't understand the shape of furniture that they think is normal, it actually looks new and foreign to their eyes, because of that many people are looking for an overview of the shape of furniture through social media to find out more about the shape of the furniture model, by taking advantage of current technological developments, the existence of AR technology is now the form of furniture models not only images, but ordinary images can be a 3D form that can be visualized into the real world through camera projections with special applications. The development method used in making this application is the Prototype method which consists of Listen to Customer, Build and Revise Mock-up, Customer Test Drives Mock-up. The system designer method uses design tools such as Use Case Diagrams, Activity Diagrams, Sequence Diagrams. The results of this study are the AR application for 3D visualization of kitchen furniture using Augmented Reality technology with the markerless method to increase consumer interest and clarify the description of the shape of the furniture model itself, with the markerless method the application can be used with any marker media and anywhere. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gait analysis plays an important role in the fields of healthcare and sports sciences. Conventional gait analysis relies on costly equipment such as optical motion capture cameras and wearable sensors, some of which require trained assessors for data collection and processing. With the recent developments in computer vision and deep neural networks, using monocular RGB cameras for 3D human pose estimation has shown tremendous promise as a cost-effective and efficient solution for clinical gait analysis. In this paper, a markerless human pose technique is developed using motion captured by a consumer monocular camera (800 × 600 pixels and 30 FPS) for clinical gait analysis. The experimental results have shown that the proposed post-processing algorithm significantly improved the original human pose detection model (BlazePose)’s prediction performance compared to the gold-standard gait signals by 10.7% using the MoVi dataset. In addition, the predicted T2 score has an excellent correlation with ground truth (r = 0.99 and y = 0.94x + 0.01 regression line), which supports that our approach can be a potential alternative to the conventional marker-based solution to assist the clinical gait assessment.

With advancements in technology able to quantify wide-ranging features of human movement, the aim of the present study was to investigate the inter-device technological reliability of a three-dimensional markerless motion capture system (3D-MCS), quantifying different movement tasks. A total of 20 healthy individuals performed a test battery consisting of 29 different movements, from which 214 different metrics were derived. Two 3D-MCS located in close proximity were utilized to quantify movement characteristics. Independent sample t-tests with selected reliability statistics (i.e., intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), effect sizes, and mean absolute differences) were used to evaluate the agreement between the two systems. The study results suggested that 95.7% of all metrics analyzed revealed negligible or small between-device effect sizes. Further, 91.6% of all metrics analyzed showed moderate or better agreement when looking at the ICC values, while 32.2% of all metrics showed excellent agreement. For metrics measuring joint angles (198 metrics), the mean difference between systems was 2.9 degrees, while for metrics investigating distance measures (16 metrics; e.g., center of mass depth), the mean difference between systems was 0.62 cm. Caution is advised when trying to generalize the study findings beyond the specific technology and software used in this investigation. Given the technological reliability reported in this study, as well as the logistical and time-related limitations associated with marker-based motion capture systems, it may be suggested that 3D-MCS present practitioners with an opportunity to reliably and efficiently measure the movement characteristics of patients and athletes. This has implications for monitoring the health/performance of a broad range of populations.

Markerless motion capture systems (MCS) have been developed as an alternative solution to overcome the limitations of 3D MCS as they provide a more practical and efficient setup process given, among other factors, the lack of sensors attached to the body. However, this might affect the accuracy of the measures recorded. Thus, this study is aimed at evaluating the level of agreement between a markerless MSC (i.e., MotionMetrix) and an optoelectronic MCS (i.e., Qualisys). For such purpose, 24 healthy young adults were assessed for walking (at 5 km/h) and running (at 10 and 15 km/h) in a single session. The parameters obtained from MotionMetrix and Qualisys were tested in terms of level of agreement. When walking at 5 km/h, the MotionMetrix system significantly underestimated the stance and swing phases, as well as the load and pre-swing phases (p < 0.05) reporting also relatively low systematic bias (i.e., ≤ −0.03 s) and standard error of the estimate (SEE) (i.e., ≤0.02 s). The level of agreement between measurements was perfect (r > 0.9) for step length left and cadence and very large (r > 0.7) for step time left, gait cycle, and stride length. Regarding running at 10 km/h, bias and SEE analysis revealed significant differences for most of the variables except for stride time, rate and length, swing knee flexion for both legs, and thigh flexion left. The level of agreement between measurements was very large (r > 0.7) for stride time and rate, stride length, and vertical displacement. At 15 km/h, bias and SEE revealed significant differences for vertical displacement, landing knee flexion for both legs, stance knee flexion left, thigh flexion, and extension for both legs. The level of agreement between measurements in running at 15 km/h was almost perfect (r > 0.9) when comparing Qualisys and MotionMetrix parameters for stride time and rate, and stride length. The agreement between the two motion capture systems varied for different variables and speeds of locomotion, with some variables demonstrating high agreement while others showed poor agreement. Nonetheless, the findings presented here suggest that the MotionMetrix system is a promising option for sports practitioners and clinicians interested in measuring gait variables, particularly in the contexts examined in the study.

Simple Summary: Running is a physical activity practiced by many people to maintain good levels of movement. Recreational runners commonly strike the ground with the postero–lateral zone of the foot, which may be associated with a higher biomechanical load on the lower limb, called impact peak. Different running shoes with specific cushioning are available to overcome the biomechanical load, e.g., shoes with a thickness difference between the forefoot and heel parts of the sole, called heel-to-toe drop. Analyzing the running pattern of recreational runners may be challenging because biomechanics laboratories mainly analyze these characteristics in individuals with visible alterations. To overcome these limitations, we employed a 3D markerless system; furthermore, we investigated footwear use. These parameters were studied to understand the behavior of those runners with and without a higher impact peak. Thirty participants underwent a running analysis and a questionnaire about their footwear. The study's main finding highlighted kinematic and spatiotemporal differences between the runners presenting a higher impact peak and those without it. Furthermore, we observed that runners without an impact peak prefer shoes with a lower heel-to-toe drop, while the other group prefers shoes with a higher heel-to-toe drop. Investigating biomechanics characteristics is essential to reduce possible injury. Running is a physical activity and the investigation of its biomechanical aspects is crucial both to avoid injuries and enhance performance. Recreational runners may be liable to increased stress over the body, particularly to lower limb joints. This study investigates the different running patterns of recreational runners by analyzing characteristics of the footwear impact peak, spatiotemporal, and kinematic parameters among those that present with a peak impact and those that do not, with a 3D markerless system. Thirty recreational runners were divided into two groups: impact peak group (IP) (n = 16) and no impact peak group (n = 14) (n-IP). Kinematic and spatiotemporal parameters showed a large Cohen's d effect size between the groups. The mean hip flexion was IP 40.40° versus n-IP 32.30° (d = −0.82). Hip extension was IP 30.20° versus n-IP 27.70° (d = −0.58), and ankle dorsiflexion was IP 20.80°, versus n-IP 13.37° (d = −1.17). Stride length was IP 117.90 cm versus n-IP 105.50 cm (d = −0.84). Steps per minute was IP group 170 spm, versus n-IP 163 spm (d = −0.51). The heel-to-toe drop was mainly 10–12 mm for the IP group and 4–6 mm for the n-IP group. Recreational runners whose hip extension is around 40°, ankle dorsiflexion around 20°, and initial foot contact around 14°, may be predisposed to the presence of an impact peak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of markerless motion capture systems is becoming more popular for walking and running analysis given their user-friendliness and their time efficiency but in some cases their validity is uncertain. Here, the test-retest reliability of the MotionMetrix software combined with the use of Kinect sensors is tested with 24 healthy volunteers for walking (at 5 km·h−1) and running (at 10 and 15 km·h−1) gait analysis in two different trials. All the parameters given by the MotionMetrix software for both walking and running gait analysis are tested in terms of reliability. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found for walking gait parameters between both trials except for the phases of loading response and double support, and the spatiotemporal parameters of step length and step frequency. Additionally, all the parameters exhibit acceptable reliability (CV < 10%) but step width (CV > 10%). When analyzing running gait, although the parameters here tested exhibited different reliability values at 10 km·h−1, the system provided reliable measurements for most of the kinematic and kinetic parameters (CV < 10%) when running at 15 km·h−1. Overall, the results obtained show that, although some variables must be interpreted with caution, the Kinect + MotionMetrix system may be useful for walking and running gait analysis. Nevertheless, the validity still needs to be determined against a gold standard system to fully trust this technology and software combination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Single camera markerless motion capture has the potential to facilitate at home movement assessment due to the ease of setup, portability, and affordable cost of the technology. However, it is not clear what the current healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture are and what information is being collected that may be used to inform clinical decision making. This review aims to map the available literature to highlight potential use cases and identify the limitations of the technology for clinicians and researchers interested in the collection of movement data. Survey Methodology. Studies were collected up to 14 January 2022 using Pubmed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus using a systematic search. Data recorded included the description of the markerless system, clinical outcome measures, and biomechanical data mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework (ICF). Studies were grouped by patient population. Results. A total of 50 studies were included for data collection. Use cases for single camera markerless motion capture technology were identified for Neurological Injury in Children and Adults; Hereditary/Genetic Neuromuscular Disorders; Frailty; and Orthopaedic or Musculoskeletal groups. Single camera markerless systems were found to perform well in studies involving single plane measurements, such as in the analysis of infant general movements or spatiotemporal parameters of gait, when evaluated against 3D marker-based systems and a variety of clinical outcome measures. However, they were less capable than marker-based systems in studies requiring the tracking of detailed 3D kinematics or fine movements such as finger tracking. Conclusions. Single camera markerless motion capture offers great potential for extending the scope of movement analysis outside of laboratory settings in a practical way, but currently suffers from a lack of accuracy where detailed 3D kinematics are required for clinical decision making. Future work should therefore focus on improving tracking accuracy of movements that are out of plane relative to the camera orientation or affected by occlusion, such as supination and pronation of the forearm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kinematic analysis of the upper limbs is a good way to assess and monitor recovery in individuals with stroke, but it remains little used in clinical routine due to its low feasibility. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Kinect v2 for the analysis of upper limb reaching kinematics. Twenty-six healthy participants performed seated hand-reaching tasks while holding a dumbbell to induce behaviour similar to that of stroke survivors. With the Kinect v2 and with the VICON, 3D upper limb and trunk motions were simultaneously recorded. The Kinect assesses trunk compensations, hand range of motion, movement time and mean velocity with a moderate to excellent reliability. In contrast, elbow and shoulder range of motion, time to peak velocity and path length ratio have a poor to moderate reliability. Finally, instantaneous hand and elbow tracking are not precise enough to reliably assess the number of velocity peaks and the peak hand velocity. Thanks to its ease of use and markerless properties, the Kinect can be used in clinical routine for semi-automated quantitative diagnostics guiding individualised rehabilitation of the upper limb. However, engineers and therapists must bear in mind the tracking limitations of the Kinect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Candida albicans is the most common fungal pathogen of humans. Historically, molecular genetic analysis of this important pathogen has been hampered by the lack of stable plasmids or meiotic cell division, limited selectable markers, and inefficient methods for generating gene knockouts. The recent development of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat(s) (CRISPR)-based tools for use with C. albicans has opened the door to more efficient genome editing; however, previously reported systems have specific limitations. We report the development of an optimized CRISPR-based genome editing system for use with C. albicans. Our system is highly efficient, does not require molecular cloning, does not leave permanent markers in the genome, and supports rapid, precise genome editing in C. albicans. We also demonstrate the utility of our system for generating two independent homozygous gene knockouts in a single transformation and present a method for generating homozygous wild-type gene addbacks at the native locus. Furthermore, each step of our protocol is compatible with high-throughput strain engineering approaches, thus opening the door to the generation of a complete C. albicans gene knockout library. IMPORTANCECandida albicans is the major fungal pathogen of humans and is the subject of intense biomedical and discovery research. Until recently, the pace of research in this field has been hampered by the lack of efficient methods for genome editing. We report the development of a highly efficient and flexible genome editing system for use with C. albicans. This system improves upon previously published C. albicans CRISPR systems and enables rapid, precise genome editing without the use of permanent markers. This new tool kit promises to expedite the pace of research on this important fungal pathogen.

Background Single camera markerless motion capture has the potential to facilitate at home movement assessment due to the ease of setup, portability, and affordable cost of the technology. However, it is not clear what the current healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture are and what information is being collected that may be used to inform clinical decision making. This review aims to map the available literature to highlight potential use cases and identify the limitations of the technology for clinicians and researchers interested in the collection of movement data. Survey Methodology Studies were collected up to 14 January 2022 using Pubmed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus using a systematic search. Data recorded included the description of the markerless system, clinical outcome measures, and biomechanical data mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework (ICF). Studies were grouped by patient population. Results A total of 50 studies were included for data collection. Use cases for single camera markerless motion capture technology were identified for Neurological Injury in Children and Adults; Hereditary/Genetic Neuromuscular Disorders; Frailty; and Orthopaedic or Musculoskeletal groups. Single camera markerless systems were found to perform well in studies involving single plane measurements, such as in the analysis of infant general movements or spatiotemporal parameters of gait, when evaluated against 3D marker-based systems and a variety of clinical outcome measures. However, they were less capable than marker-based systems in studies requiring the tracking of detailed 3D kinematics or fine movements such as finger tracking. Conclusions Single camera markerless motion capture offers great potential for extending the scope of movement analysis outside of laboratory settings in a practical way, but currently suffers from a lack of accuracy where detailed 3D kinematics are required for clinical decision making. Future work should therefore focus on improving tracking accuracy of movements that are out of plane relative to the camera orientation or affected by occlusion, such as supination and pronation of the forearm.

Fitness adalah kegiatan pembentukan otot-otot tubuh atau fisik yang dilakukan secara rutin dan berkala, yang bertujuan untuk menjaga fitalitas tubuh agar tetap bugar dan sehat. Lansia merupakan tahap akhir dalam kehidupan manusia ditandai dengan menurunnya kemampuan kerja tubuh akibat penurunan dan perubahan fungsi organ tubuh. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memanfaatkan teknologi augmented reality sebagai media panduan gerakan fitness untuk manula yang dapat membantu minat lansia untuk menjalankan olahraga kapanpun dan dimanapun agar dapat mengurangi resiko jatuh dan penurunan kekuatan otot serta terhindarnya dari penyakit yang berbahaya. Aplikasi ini menggunakan Library kudan SDK yang mampu menampilkan animasi 3D gerakan fitness manula dengan menggunakan teknik markerless tracking dalam bentuk augmented reality. Hasil dari implementasi teknologi augmented reality yaitu aplikasi panduan fitness untuk manula yang dapat dijalankan pada smartphone dengan sistem operasi android. Setelah dilakukan pengujian dengan black box, fungsi-fungsi tombol pada aplikasi dapat berjalan dengan baik dan menampilkan hasil yang sesuai dengan tujuan yang diharapkan. Aplikasi dapat menampilkan animasi 3D gerakan fitness manula dengan cepat pada siang hari dan malam hari, di dalam maupun di luar ruangan dengan syarat intensitas cahaya diatas 1 lux pada jarak minimal 10 cm dan maksimal jarak 60 cm dengan sudut diatas 10o hingga 90o. Pengujian kuesioner dengan jumlah 5 responden diperoleh hasil jawaban dengan total rata-rata persentase yaitu 87,2% kriteria sangat baik, maka aplikasi ini dapat dijadikan sebagai media untuk mempelajari gerakan fitness pada manula.

A single depth camera provides a fast and easy approach to performing biomechanical assessments in a clinical setting; however, there are currently no established methods to reliably determine joint angles from these devices. The primary aim of this study was to compare joint angles as well as the between-day reliability of direct kinematics to model-constrained inverse kinematics recorded using a single markerless depth camera during a range of clinical and athletic movement assessments.A secondary aim was to determine the minimum number of trials required to maximize reliability. Eighteen healthy participants attended two testing sessions one week apart. Tasks included treadmill walking, treadmill running, single-leg squats, single-leg countermovement jumps, bilateral countermovement jumps, and drop vertical jumps. Keypoint data were processed using direct kinematics as well as in OpenSim using a full-body musculoskeletal model and inverse kinematics. Kinematic methods were compared using statistical parametric mapping and between-day reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients, mean absolute error, and minimal detectable change. Keypoint-derived inverse kinematics resulted in significantly smaller hip flexion (range = −9 to −2°), hip abduction (range = −3 to −2°), knee flexion (range = −5° to −2°), and greater dorsiflexion angles (range = 6–15°) than direct kinematics. Both markerless kinematic methods had high between-day reliability (inverse kinematics ICC 95 %CI = 0.83–0.90; direct kinematics ICC 95 %CI = 0.80–0.93). For certain tasks and joints, keypoint-derived inverse kinematics resulted in greater reliability (up to 0.47 ICC) and smaller minimal detectable changes (up to 13°) than direct kinematics. Performing 2–4 trials was sufficient to maximize reliability for most tasks. A single markerless depth camera can reliably measure lower limb joint angles, and skeletal model-constrained inverse kinematics improves lower limb joint angle reliability for certain tasks and joints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, several systems have been developed to capture human motion in real-time using common RGB cameras. This approach has great potential to become widespread among the general public as it allows the remote evaluation of exercise at no additional cost. The concept of using these systems in rehabilitation in the home environment has been discussed, but no work has addressed the practical problem of detecting basic body parts under different sensing conditions on a large scale. In this study, we evaluate the ability of the OpenPose pose estimation algorithm to perform keypoint detection of anatomical landmarks under different conditions. We infer the quality of detection based on the keypoint confidence values reported by the OpenPose. We used more than two thousand unique exercises for the evaluation. We focus on the influence of the camera view and the influence of the position of the trainees, which are essential in terms of the use for home exercise. Our results show that the position of the trainee has the greatest effect, in the following increasing order of suitability across all camera views: lying position, position on the knees, sitting position, and standing position. On the other hand, the effect of the camera view was only marginal, showing that the side view is having slightly worse results. The results might also indicate that the quality of detection of lower body joints is lower across all conditions than the quality of detection of upper body joints. In this practical overview, we present the possibilities and limitations of current camera-based systems in telerehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Markerless motion capture systems are promising for the assessment of movement in more real world research and clinical settings. While the technology has come a long way in the last 20 years, it is important for researchers and clinicians to understand the capacities and considerations for implementing these types of systems. The current review provides a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis related to the successful adoption of markerless motion capture technology for the assessment of lower-limb musculoskeletal kinematics in sport medicine and performance settings. 31 articles met the a priori inclusion criteria of this analysis. Findings from the analysis indicate that the improving accuracy of these systems via the refinement of machine learning algorithms, combined with their cost efficacy and the enhanced ecological validity outweighs the current weaknesses and threats. Further, the analysis makes clear that there is a need for multidisciplinary collaboration between sport scientists and computer vision scientists to develop accurate clinical and research applications that are specific to sport. While work remains to be done for broad application, markerless motion capture technology is currently on a positive trajectory and the data from this analysis provide an efficient roadmap toward widespread adoption.

Objective In recent years, real-time, accurate, and markerless recognition of sports motions has been a hot issue. The related researches on machine learning or deep learning recognition of specific sports or target motions were systemetically reviewed based on computer vision data input and a reference was provided for the application of markerless motion capture technology in the field of sports science. Methods The documents published from January 2000 to June 2020 in 6 databases were collected, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and CNKI through Boolean logic operations. 23 research articles were included after screening, and the first author/year of publication, movement type/target action, subject information, camera parameters, image feature extraction technology, action recognition algorithm, action recognition quality evaluation method, image data training and verification methods, action recognition accuracy performance, and other key information were extracted. Results 39% of the studies use machine learning algorithms based on support vector machines, and 35% of the studies use deep learning algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Classification accuracy, confusion matrix, and displacement error are the action recognition quality evaluation methods used in most studies. Conclusion Field camera settings based on computer vision, image feature extraction, and motion recognition algorithm model development need to be combined with specific sports, application scenarios, and accuracy requirements for multi-dimensional comprehensive measurement. With the development of deep learning recognition algorithms and wearable wireless sensing equipment, the accuracy, real-time, and robustness of unmarked motion capture will be further improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Markerless human motion capture could be a potential tool for studying body biomechanics. Despite the extensive previous studies, the design of an accurate markerless system able to perform a quantitative clinical gait analysis is still an open challenge. Our purpose was to characterize the performance of a low-cost markerless system, consisting of the open-source library OpenPose, two webcams and a linear triangulation algorithm. The system was validated in terms of 3D kinematic gait analysis, by comparison with inertial sensors. Two synchronized videos of six healthy subjects were recorded in three webcam configurations, in walking and running sessions on a treadmill. Sagittal joint angles were compared between the two systems, to evaluate the kinematic performance of the markerless system. Results showed that the angular paths, provided by OpenPose, were close to the ones computed by inertial sensors in all camera positions, but OpenPose inaccuracy affected the computation of joint angles parameters producing absolute errors up to 14.0°± 1.8°. The observed differences depended on OpenPose ability in the recognition of joints centers and on camera configurations. In the optimal condition (joint visible from both cameras during the whole trial) our system accuracy resulted equal to 1.6 °± 0.3 °. This system could be useful in those applications where a real-time body tracking is required, i.e. video games or virtual rehabilitative trials. When a quantitative analysis is needed, the low level of accuracy may be overcome, by both increasing the cameras’ number and implementing an optimization triangulation algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]