Search

Introduction: Reconstructive plastic surgeons have made great strides in the field of breast reconstruction to achieve the best results for patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. As microsurgical techniques have evolved, these patients can benefit from additional treatment modalities to optimize the results of the reconstruction. Free tissue transfer from alternative donor sites for breast reconstruction is routinely performed, which was not possible in the past. Neurotization is now possible to address the numbness and lack of sensation to the reconstructed breast. For those patients who develop lymphedema of the upper extremity as a result of their breast cancer care, supermicrosurgical options are now available to treat and even to prevent the development of lymphedema. This study presents a narrative review regarding the latest microsurgical advancements in autologous free flap breast reconstruction. Methods: A literature review was performed on PubMed with the key words "autologous free flap breast reconstruction", "deep inferior epigastric perforator flap", "transverse upper gracilis flap", "profunda artery perforator flap", "superior gluteal artery perforator flap", "inferior gluteal artery perforator flap", "lumbar artery perforator flap", "breast neurotization", "lymphovenous bypass and anastomosis", and "vascularized lymph node transfer". Articles that specifically focused on free flap breast reconstruction, breast neurotization, and lymphedema surgery in the setting of breast cancer were evaluated and included in this literature review. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 4948 articles which were screened. After the initial screening, 413 articles were reviewed to assess the relevance and applicability to the current study. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction has evolved tremendously in recent years to provide the most natural and cosmetically pleasing results for those patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. As technology and surgical techniques have progressed, breast cancer patients now have many more options, particularly if they are interested in autologous reconstruction. These advancements also provide the possibility of restoring sensibility to the reconstructed breast as well as treating the sequela of lymphedema due to their cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The microsurgical treatment of lymphedema has been well-studied and has been shown to be effective, especially in cancer-related lymphedema. Posttraumatic lymphedema (PTL) is a debilitating condition that remains understudied and underreported, and surgical techniques for PTL treatment are not well-represented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to systematically review all published reports of physiologic surgical interventions for PTL. Methods A search was conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, from January 1, 2000 to December 6, 2022, using keywords "PTL," "lymphedema," and "surgery" to identify reports of PTL treated with microsurgical lymphatic reconstruction techniques. PTL cases treated with ablation, debulking, or decongestive therapy were excluded. Results A total of 18 records that met the inclusion criteria were identified, representing 112 patients who underwent microsurgical operations for PTL. This included 60 cases of lymph flow restoration (LFR) via lymph axiality and interpositional flap transfer, 29 vascularized lymph node transfers, 11 lymphatic vessel free flaps, 10 lymphovenous anastomoses (LVAs), and 2 autologous lymphovenous transfers. Outcomes were primarily reported as clinical improvement or LFR by lymphatic imaging. All studies showed qualitative improvement of symptoms and reports with quantitative data showed statistically significant improvements. Conclusion PTL is currently underrepresented in lymphedema treatment literature, however, our results show that microsurgical techniques are successful in treating lymphedema in PTL patients. Increasing awareness of PTL and establishing standardized diagnostic criteria and treatment options will help clinicians better understand how to diagnose and treat this condition. Prospective and comparative studies are needed to determine true prevalence of PTL and optimal treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persistent lymphocele of the groin is a complication of groin surgery that can severely impact the quality of life. The restoration of the interrupted lymphatic pathway is considered by many authors the ideal treatment to prevent a recurrence. However, multiple aspiration procedures and surgical revisions can compromise the availability of local veins needed for a lymphovenular bypass surgery. In addition, surgical debridement of a long-standing lymphocele can generate extensive dead space and contour deformity. A flap delivering additional venules for trans-flap lymphovenular anastomoses (LVAs) can overcome both problems by providing soft tissue and competent veins harvested outside the zone of injury.

Persistent lymphocele of the groin is a complication of groin surgery that can severely impact the quality of life. The restoration of the interrupted lymphatic pathway is considered by many authors the ideal treatment to prevent a recurrence. However, multiple aspiration procedures and surgical revisions can compromise the availability of local veins needed for a lymphovenular bypass surgery. In addition, surgical debridement of a long-standing lymphocele can generate extensive dead space and contour deformity. A flap delivering additional venules for trans-flap lymphovenular anastomoses (LVAs) can overcome both problems by providing soft tissue and competent veins harvested outside the zone of injury. A successful case of severe groin lymphocele treated with trans-flap LVAs from an abdominal-based flap is presented. The patient was referred to us for a recurrent lymphocele developed in the right groin after lipoma excision that persisted despite multiple surgical attempts. After the identification of patent and draining inguinal lymphatic vessels, a pinch test was used to design a mini-abdominoplasty superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. The superficial veins of the cranial incision were identified and anastomosed to the lymphatic vessels after the pedicled flap harvested and insetted in the groin. The early restoration of lymphatic drainage and the optimal aesthetic outcome supports the combined approach offered by trans-flap LVAs as a valuable therapeutic option for severe and persistent lymphocele. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultrasound has revolutionized reconstructive microsurgery, offering real-time imaging and enhanced precision allowing for preoperative flap planning, recipient vessel identification and selection, postoperative flap monitoring, and lymphatic surgery. This narrative review of the literature provides an updated evidence-based overlook on the current applications and emerging frontiers of ultrasound in microsurgery, focusing on free tissue transfer and lymphatic surgery. Color duplex ultrasound (CDU) plays a pivotal role in preoperative flap planning and design, providing real-time imaging that enables detailed perforator mapping, perforator suitability assessment, blood flow velocity measurement, and, ultimately, flap design optimization. Ultrasound also aids in recipient vessel selection by providing assessment of caliber, patency, location, and flow velocity of recipient vessels. Postoperatively, ultrasound enables real-time monitoring of flap perfusion, providing early detection of potential flap compromise and improved flap survival rates. In lymphatic surgery, ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) offers precise mapping and evaluation of lymphatic vessels, improving efficacy and efficiency by targeting larger dilated vessels. Integrating ultrasound into reconstructive microsurgery represents a significant advancement in the utilization of imaging in the field. With growing accessibility of devices, improved training, and technological advancements, using ultrasound as a key imaging tool offers substantial potential for the evolution of reconstructive microsurgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionIn recent years advances have been made in the microsurgical treatment of congenital or acquired central lymphatic lesions. While acquired lesions can result from any surgery or trauma of the central lymphatic system, congenital lymphatic lesions can have a variety of manifestations, ranging from singular thoracic duct abnormalities to complex multifocal malformations. Both conditions may cause recurrent chylous effusions and downstream lymphatic congestion depending on the anatomical location of the thoracic duct lesion and are associated with an increased mortality due to the permanent loss of protein and fluid.MethodsWe present a case series of eleven patients undergoing central lymphatic reconstruction, consisting of one patient with a cervical iatrogenic thoracic duct lesion and eleven patients with different congenital thoracic duct lesions or thrombotic occlusions.ResultsAnastomosis of the thoracic duct and a nearby vein was performed on different anatomical levels depending on the underlying central lymphatic pathology. Cervical (n = 4), thoracic (n = 1) or abdominal access (n = 5) was used for central lymphatic reconstruction with promising results. In 9 patients a postoperative benefit with varying degrees of symptom regression was reported.ConclusionThe presented case series illustrates the current rapid advances in the field of central microsurgical reconstruction of lymphatic lesions alongside the relevant literature.

Purpose of Review: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a major contributor to morbidity in breast cancer survivors. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has emerged as a promising surgical option for prevention of BCRL. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate recent literature on ILR in breast cancer patients. Recent Findings: Short-term outcomes of ILR at most centers have shown low BCRL rates similar to those seen with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Some centers reporting more than 4-year follow-up have demonstrated up to 50–75% BCRL risk reduction following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Others have demonstrated equivocal results from ILR. ILR appears to be surgically and oncologically safe. Summary: ILR continues to be a promising surgical technique to reduce the risk of BCRL following ALND. Ongoing evaluation is needed to characterize the extent of protective effect conferred by ILR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review: This review provides a practical, evidence-based summary of lymphedema with a focus on its clinical management to guide clinicians in providing the most current treatment options for their patients. Recent findings: The cornerstone of the management of lymphedema is adherence to appropriate general care measures and high-quality compression. There have been advances in invasive options using highly specialized operative techniques that either facilitate lymphatic drainage or bring new lymphatic growth to an area otherwise devoid of viable lymph tissue. For patients with more advanced disease, operative debulking can decrease limb girth and improve limb mobility. Summary: Lymphedema centers involving multi-disciplinary care teams are equipped to provide patients with advanced diagnostic imaging, comprehensive non-invasive management strategies, and specialized surgical options to address their condition. Early referral to dedicated lymphatic centers with microsurgical expertise can provide patients with nuanced conservative and surgical options that have the potential to improve limb outcomes and overall quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary lymphedema is a heterogeneous group of conditions encompassing all lymphatic anomalies that result in lymphatic swelling. Primary lymphedema can be difficult to diagnose, and diagnosis is often delayed. As opposed to secondary lymphedema, primary lymphedema has an unpredictable disease course, often progressing more slowly. Primary lymphedema can be associated with various genetic syndromes or can be idiopathic. Diagnosis is often clinical, although imaging can be a helpful adjunct. The literature on treating primary lymphedema is limited, and treatment algorithms are largely based on practice patterns for secondary lymphedema. The mainstay of treatment focuses on complete decongestive therapy, including manual lymphatic drainage and compression therapy. For those who fail conservative treatment, surgical treatment can be an option. Microsurgical techniques have shown promise in primary lymphedema, with both lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfers demonstrating improved clinical outcomes in a few studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The lympho-venous shunt using the distal vein of ALT flap pedicle allowed at the same time the coverage of the inguinal defects and to perform lymphovenous shunt into a run-in vein of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle, draining the lymph through the flap pedicle. Surgical technique, complications and final outcomes (both clinical and lymphoscintigraphic) are reported. Five patients (45.8 y.o.[22–70]) with groin soft tissue loss with lymphatic leakage or lower limb lymphedema, benefited of the described technique. The ALT flap was used to cover the defect and, at the same time, we could perform a lymphovenous shunt between afferent lymphatics to the thigh and the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle, distal to the perforator nourishing the flap. Clinical and lymphoscintigraphic assessment of the limbs, cease of lymphorrhea or cellulitis/lymphangitis episodes, eventual downstaging of physiologic/physical therapy were recorded. LYMphatic Quality Of Life in leg (LYMQoLLeg) and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Average flap size was 88.8cm2 (range 84–126). The mean number of multi-lymphovenous anastomosis (MLVA) performed was 1.8 (range 1–3) per patient with 1–3 lymphatics shunted into each vein. Only one hemato-seroma requiring surgical revision. Mean improvement of perometer values was 48.2% (range 27.7–67.7) with an average follow-up of 13.6 months (range 12–17). Lymphoscintigraphy showed disappearing of the lymphatic leak and lymphedema with a high satisfaction of LYMQoL score. The combination of pedicle flap with lympho-venous bypass as lymphatic derivation concept, improving the chronic morbidity scenarios of lymphatic complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can reduce the incidence of lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. The oncologic safety of ILR is unknown and has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if ILR is associated with increased breast cancer recurrence rates. Methods: Patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND with ILR from September 2016 to December 2020 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and operative details were recorded. Follow-up included the development of local recurrence as well as distant metastasis. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 137 patients underwent ALND with ILR. At cancer presentation, 122 patients (89%) had clinically node positive primary breast cancer, 10 patients (7.3%) had recurrent breast cancer involving the axillary lymph nodes, 3 patients (2.2%) had recurrent breast cancer involving both the breast and axillary nodes, and 2 patients (1.5%) presented with axillary disease/occult breast cancer. For surgical management, 103 patients (75.2%) underwent a mastectomy, 22 patients (16%) underwent lumpectomy and 12 patients (8.8%) had axillary surgery only. The ALND procedure, yielded a median of 15 lymph nodes pathologically identified (range 3–41). At a median follow-up of 32.9 months (range 6–63 months), 17 patients (12.4%) developed a local (n = 1) or distant recurrence (n = 16), however, no axillary recurrences were identified. Conclusion: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing ALND is not associated with short term axillary recurrence and appears oncologically safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The postoperative mammographic imaging appearance related to lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfer has not been described. It is important for breast imagers to become familiar with the expected appearance of surgical changes that can be seen in the follow up imaging of breast cancer survivors in order to create accurate reports and adjust imaging protocols to improve imaging quality and lessen patient discomfort as needed.

• Lymphedema is an important consideration following severe morel-Lavallee lesions. • Lymphovenous anastomoses can prevent fluid accumulation and restore lymphatic drainage by reconstructing lymphatic outflow. • Plastic surgeons are well equipped to treat these patients using modern diagnostic and microsurgical lymphatic techniques. Morel-Lavallee Lesions lead to disruption of lymphatic anatomy that require early identification and may necessitate lymphatic reconstruction. We present the case of a 59-year-old male with lower extremity lymphedema resulting after a severe Morel-Lavallee lesion and treated using lymphovenous anastomoses. He was initially managed with multiple aspirations followed by repeat incision and drainage. At 10 months following his injury, he continued to have swelling of his upper thigh and developed a large festoon medially, with lower leg pitting edema. He was diagnosed with lymphedema via lymphoscintigraphy. His superficial lymphatic anatomy was visualized using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography and showed diffuse dermal backflow across his thigh, with signs of altered lymphatic anatomy distally. We preformed two lymphovenous anastomoses at the level of his mid-thigh to bypass the lymphatic disruption and restore drainage to his lower leg. After rerouting lymphatic flow from the lower extremity, the patient had overall improvement of his symptoms and reduced swelling with continued therapy. At 5 months postoperatively, his volumetric lower extremity measurements showed a decrease by 314 mL and he began walking again in 20-minute intervals. Lymphedema may be an important consideration following severe Morel-Lavallee lesions. Using modern diagnostic and supermicrosurgical techniques, plastic surgeons can help treat this long-term morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Millions of people worldwide suffer from lymphedema. In developed nations, lymphedema most commonly stems secondarily from oncologic treatment, but may also result from trauma. More recently, lymphedema has been identified in patients after gender-affirmation phalloplasty reconstruction. Regardless of the etiology, the underlying pathophysiology involves blockage of lymphatic flow, resulting in lymph stasis, thus triggering a cascade of inflammation culminating in fibrosis and adipose deposition. Recent technical advances led to the refinement of physiologic and reductive surgeries—including lymphovenous anastomosis and free functional lymphatic transfer, which collectively encompass a variety of flap procedures including lymph node transfer, lymph channel transfer, and lymphatic system transfer. This article provides a summary of our approach in the assessment and management of the lymphedema patient, including detailed intraoperative photography and imaging, in addition to advanced technical considerations in physiologic reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background  Breast cancer treatment, including axillary lymph node excision, radiation, and chemotherapy, can cause upper extremity lymphedema, increasing morbidity and health care costs. Institutions increasingly perform prophylactic lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to reduce the risk of lymphedema but reports of complications are lacking. We examine records from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to examine the safety of these procedures. Methods  Procedures involving ALND from 2013 to 2019 were extracted from the NSQIP database. Patients who simultaneously underwent procedures with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 38999 (other procedures of the lymphatic system), 35201 (repair of blood vessel), or 38308 (lymphangiotomy) formed the prophylactic LVB group. Patients in the LVB and non-LVB groups were compared for differences in demographics and 30-day postoperative complications including unplanned reoperation, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection. Subgroup analysis was performed, controlling for extent of breast surgery and reconstruction. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of reoperation. Results  The ALND without LVB group contained 45,057 patients, and the ALND with LVB group contained 255 (0.6%). Overall, the LVB group was associated with increased operative time (288 vs. 147 minutes, p  < 0.001) and length of stay (1.7 vs. 1.3 days, p  < 0.001). In patients with concurrent mastectomy without immediate reconstruction, the LVB group had a higher rate of DVTs (3.0 vs. 0.2%, p  = 0.009). Reoperation, wound infection, and dehiscence rates did not differ across subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that LVB was not a predictor of reoperations. Conclusion  Prophylactic LVB at time of ALND is a generally safe and well-tolerated procedure and is not associated with increased reoperations or wound complications. Although only four patients in the LVB group had DVTs, this was a significantly higher rate than in the non-LVB group and warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the long-term impact of physiologic surgical options, including VLNT and LVB, on patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper or lower extremity (UEL/LEL). Summary Background Data: VLNT and LVB have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lymphedema. However, there is a paucity of long-term data on patient outcomes after use of these techniques to treat lymphedema. Methods: An analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients who underwent physiologic surgical treatment of secondary lymphedema over a 5.5-year period was performed. Patient demographics, surgical details, subjective reported improvements, LLIS scores, and postoperative limb volume calculations were analyzed. Results: Two hundred seventy-four patients with secondary lymphedema (197 upper, 77 lower) were included in the study. More than 87% of UEL patients and 60% of LEL patients had reduction in excess limb volume postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, patients with UEL had a 31.1% reduction in volume difference between limbs, 33.9% at 6 months, 25.7% at 12 months, 47.4% at 24 months and 47.7% at 4 years. The reduction in limb volume difference followed a similar pattern but was overall lower for LEL patients. Greater than 86% of UEL and 75% of LEL patients also had improvement in LLIS scores postoperatively. Fifty-nine complications occurred (12.9%); flap survival was >99%. Conclusions: Patients with secondary UEL/LEL who undergo VLNT/LVB demonstrate improved functional status and reduced affected limb volumes postoperatively. Patients with UEL seem to have a more substantial reduction in limb volume differential compared to LEL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is targeted at preventing breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) by anastomosing disrupted arm lymphatic channels to axillary vein tributaries. Inadequate vein length and venous back-bleeding are two technical reasons that lead to ILR procedures being aborted intraoperatively. Recently, our team began routinely harvesting a lower extremity vein graft (LEVG) for all ILR procedures to reduce our abort rate. We describe the surgical approach of an LEVG and evaluate the effects on aborted case rates and intraoperative time. A retrospective review of our institutional lymphatic database was conducted. Two hundred and forty-seven breast cancer patients were taken to the operating room for attempted ILR in the past 5 years. Prior to the use of an LEVG (n = 205), our abort rate was 14%. Since routinely performing an LEVG with ILR (n = 42), we have not aborted a single case. Despite an LEVG requiring one additional anastomosis to connect the vein graft to the native axillary vein tributary, this technique has not changed the intraoperative time for ILR procedures. In this technical contribution, we describe our early experience performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction utilizing a lower extremity vein graft. Implementation of this technique appears to have promising effects on aborted case rates without affecting intraoperative time, and greatly facilitates the lymphovenous anastomosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effective lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) requires identification of functioning lymphatics, which are not always visible with contrast-based imaging in advanced-stage lymphedema patients. Ultrasound (US) allows to identify preoperatively functioning lymphatic vessels even in limbs severely affected by lymphedema. Moreover, in our experience, we observed an interesting clinical sentry in advanced-stage lymphedema patients, the hand/foot sign that is analyzed in this paper. From January 2016 to January 2019, 76 consecutive advanced-stage secondary lymphedema patients underwent LVA. Preoperative planning included lymphoscintigraphy, indocyanine-green lymphography (ICG-L) and US. Patients' features, the hand/foot sign (preservation of more normal skin on the dorsum of the hand or foot), lymphatic degeneration, quantitative, qualitative, and composite outcomes at 1-year follow-up were evaluated. An average number of 3±0.1 LVA was performed in upper limb lymphedema (ULL) (range 2–5, 47 patients) and of 4±1.08 LVAs in lower limb lymphedema (LLL) cases (range 4–7, 29 patients). The composite outcome was positive in 45 cases (59.7%). The "negative" hand /foot sign was significantly associated with presence of functioning lymphatic channels. The incidence of adverse outcomes was significantly higher in patients with positive hand/foot sign. Patients with no functioning lymphatic vessels detectable by lymphoscintigraphy and ICG-L may still have functioning lymphatic channels that can be identified preoperatively by ultra-high-frequency ultrasound and salvaged by LVA. The "hand/foot sign" is a simple clinical sentry that appears to be correlated with higher probability of being able to localize functional lymphatics for potential lymphovenous bypass surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lymphoedema is a sequela of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) that often does not respond adequately to chemoradiotherapy and complete decongestive therapy (CDT). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) is an option for patients whose lymphedema persists despite conservative treatment. We present the case of a 59-year-old man with a diagnosis of KS due to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), who presented with progressive, bilateral lower-extremity swelling refractory to CDT. This patient's lymphoedema was successfully treated with LVB, illustrating the applicability of LVB for the treatment of KS-associated lymphoedema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary lymphedema is a heterogeneous group of conditions encompassing all lymphatic anomalies that result in lymphatic swelling. Primary lymphedema can be difficult to diagnose, and diagnosis is often delayed. As opposed to secondary lymphedema, primary lymphedema has an unpredictable disease course, often progressing more slowly. Primary lymphedema can be associated with various genetic syndromes or can be idiopathic. Diagnosis is often clinical, although imaging can be a helpful adjunct. The literature on treating primary lymphedema is limited, and treatment algorithms are largely based on practice patterns for secondary lymphedema. The mainstay of treatment focuses on complete decongestive therapy, including manual lymphatic drainage and compression therapy. For those who fail conservative treatment, surgical treatment can be an option. Microsurgical techniques have shown promise in primary lymphedema, with both lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfers demonstrating improved clinical outcomes in a few studies.

Background Lymphedema is an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces resulting from impairment in the lymphatic circulation that can impair quality of life and cause considerable morbidity. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) has an overall incidence rate of 20%. Conservative therapies are the first step in treatment of LEL; however, they do not provide a cure because they fail to address the underlying physiologic dysfunction of the lymphatic system. Among several surgical alternatives, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has gained popularity due to its improved outcomes and less invasive approach. This study aims to review the published literature on LVA for LEL treatment and to analyze the surgical outcomes. Methods PubMed database was used to perform a comprehensive literature review of all articles describing LVA for treatment of LEL from Novemeber 1985 to June 2019. Search terms included “lymphovenous” OR “lymphaticovenous” AND “bypass” OR “anastomosis” OR “shunt” AND “lower extremity lymphedema.” Results A total of 95 articles were identified in the initial query, out of which 58 individual articles were deemed eligible. The studies included in this review describe notable variations in surgical techniques, number of anastomoses, and supplementary interventions. All, except one study, reported positive outcomes based on limb circumference and volume changes or subjective clinical improvement. The largest reduction rate in limb circumference and volume was 63.8%. Conclusion LVA demonstrated a considerable reduction in limb volume and improvement in subjective findings of lymphedema in the majority of patients. The maintained effectiveness of this treatment modality in long-term follow-up suggests great efficacy of LVA in LEL treatment.

Background: Lymph node transfer (LNT) and lymphovenous bypass (LVB) have been described as 2 major surgical options for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who have failed conservative therapy. The objective of our study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing LNT and LVB for the treatment of BCRL.Study Design: Rates of infection, lymph leak, and failure of LNT and LVB were obtained from a previously published meta-analysis. Failure of surgery was defined as the inability to cease compression therapy postoperatively. Procedural costs were calculated from Medicare reimbursement rates. Cost of conservative management of postoperative surgical site infection, lymph leak, and continued decongestive physiotherapy after failed surgery were obtained from literature review. Average utility scores for each health state were calculated using a visual analog scale survey, then converted to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A decision tree was constructed, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was assessed at $50,000/QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of our findings.Results: LNT was less costly ($22,492 vs $31,927) and more effective (31.82 QALY vs 29.24 QALY) than LVB. One-way (deterministic) sensitivity analysis demonstrated that LNT became cost-ineffective when its failure rate was more than 43.8%. LVB became more cost-effective than LNT when its failure rate was less than 21.4%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo simulation indicated that even with uncertainty present in the variables analyzed, the majority of simulations (97%) favored LNT as the more cost-effective strategy.Conclusions: LNT is a dominant, cost-effective strategy compared to LVB for the treatment of BCRL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We sought to determine if bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements can accurately assess changes in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in patients undergoing lymphovenous bypass (LVB). Methods: Patients undergoing LVB for BCRL refractory to conservative treatment from 1/2015 to 12/2018 were identified from an IRB-approved prospectively maintained database at a single institution. All breast cancer patients were assessed with baseline BIS measurements prior to any oncologic surgery and serial BIS during follow-up office visits including before and after LVB. Clinicopathologic information, LVB operative details, and pre- and post-LVB operative BIS measurements were collected. Analysis focused on clinically significant BIS change, defined as two standard deviations (SD), and comparing LVB anastomosis to BIS changes. Results: During the study timeframe, nine patients underwent LVB for treatment of BCRL. The majority (78%) received radiation, taxane chemotherapy, and underwent axillary dissection. An average of 5.6 LVB anastomoses were performed per patient. The average change in BIS following LVB was a 3SD reduction, indicating a clinically significant change. This improvement was stable over time, with persistent 2SD reduction at 22 months postoperatively. The number of LVB anastomoses performed did not significantly correlate with the degree of BIS change. Conclusions: This is the first study to utilize BIS measurements to assess response to LVB surgical intervention for BCRL. BIS measurements demonstrated clinically significant improvement after LVB, providing objective evidence in support of this surgical treatment for BCRL. BIS changes should be reported as key objective data in future studies assessing BCRL interventions, including response to LVB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In recent years advances have been made in the microsurgical treatment of congenital or acquired central lymphatic lesions. While acquired lesions can result from any surgery or trauma of the central lymphatic system, congenital lymphatic lesions can have a variety of manifestations, ranging from singular thoracic duct abnormalities to complex multifocal malformations. Both conditions may cause recurrent chylous effusions and downstream lymphatic congestion depending on the anatomical location of the thoracic duct lesion and are associated with an increased mortality due to the permanent loss of protein and fluid., Methods: We present a case series of eleven patients undergoing central lymphatic reconstruction, consisting of one patient with a cervical iatrogenic thoracic duct lesion and eleven patients with different congenital thoracic duct lesions or thrombotic occlusions., Results: Anastomosis of the thoracic duct and a nearby vein was performed on different anatomical levels depending on the underlying central lymphatic pathology. Cervical ( n  = 4), thoracic ( n  = 1) or abdominal access ( n  = 5) was used for central lymphatic reconstruction with promising results. In 9 patients a postoperative benefit with varying degrees of symptom regression was reported., Conclusion: The presented case series illustrates the current rapid advances in the field of central microsurgical reconstruction of lymphatic lesions alongside the relevant literature., Competing Interests: NL acts as scientific advisor and consultant for Medical Microinstruments (MMI). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Weinzierl, Grünherz, Puippe, Gnannt, von Reibnitz, Giovanoli, Vetter, Möhrlen, Wildgruber, Müller, Pieper, Gutschow and Lindenblatt.)

Introduction: Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) can be performed in different configuration such as end-to-end (LVEEA), end-to-side (LVESA), and side-to-end (LVSEA). Each configuration has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, it has remained ambiguous as to which anastomotic o configuration to choose. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the relative sizes of lymphatic vessel (LV) and recipient vein (RV), in attempts to provide the basis for proper selections of the anastomotic configuration.Methods: From March 2016 to October 2018, 100 lymphedema patients with 103 lymphedematous lower limbs (stage I-III) were included. All patients underwent supermicrosurgical LVA. Demographic data and intraoperative findings, including the number and size of the LV/RV, the size discrepancies, and the numbers of LVA performed were recorded. The severity of LVs were classified based on the lymphosclerosis classification (s0, s1, s2, and s3). One-way ANOVA test and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni's correction were performed for size discrepancy analysis.Results: A total 730 LVA were performed with 621 LVs and 468 RVs, averaging 7.1 LVA per limb. Of these, 367 (50.3%) were LVEEA, 333 (45.6%) were LVESA, and 30 (4.1%) were LVSEA. The average LV and RV size was 0.61 ± 0.35 mm and 0.87 ± 0.43 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The average LV size in different configuration: LVEEA = LVESA < LVSEA (p < 0.001); The average RV size: LVEEA = LVSEA < LVESA (p < 0.001); The size discrepancy: LVESA > LVSEA > LVEEA (p < 0.001).The LVSEA group has more s1 lymphatic vessels as opposed to LVEEA and LVESA (p = 0.004).Conclusion: The size and the comparative discrepancy between the LVs and RVs are the determining factors for proper anastomotic configuration selection during LVA. LVESA was more frequently performed when vessel size discrepancy was larger. The efficacy of each anastomotic configuration has yet to be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Upper extremity lymphedema is a much-feared complication of breast cancer treatment leading to significant impairments in patients' quality of life. The mainstay of treatment for this debilitating chronic disease has been non-surgical modalities, namely complete decongestive therapies. Surgical treatment of lymphedema has emerged as an option for patients who have exhausted these conservative measures and consists of both physiologic procedures (vascularized lymph node transplant and lymphovenous bypass) which aim to reduce the burden of lymphatic fluid and reductive procedures to remove excess soft tissue. Recent Findings: Opinions vary among surgeons regarding the appropriate surgical indications in patients with different stages of lymphedema for each type of surgery, as well as the optimal donor site for lymph node transplant, and recent studies are beginning to address these questions. Additionally, there is growing data regarding the benefits of preventative lymphatic surgery at the time of axillary lymph node dissection, as well as the cost effectiveness of this approach. Summary: Surgical approaches for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer–related lymphedema are gaining popularity as a means of improving patients' quality of life. There is an expanding body of literature demonstrating the effectiveness of these surgical procedures in terms of reduction in arm circumference, decreased cellulitis incidence, and overall quality of life, as well as emerging evidence of their cost effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Protein-losing enteropathy manifests as a loss of serum proteins through the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in hypoproteinemia, extravascular fluid retention, and edema. Management consists of nutritional maintenance in conjunction with interventions targeted at treating the underlying etiology.Materials and Methods: This report describes a patient with protein-losing enteropathy from a central conducting lymphatic obstruction who was treated with percutaneous extra-anatomic lymphovenous bypass creation.Results: A modified gun-sight technique was used to create a lymphovenous bypass between an occluded terminal thoracic duct and the left internal jugular vein.Conclusion: A percutaneous technique to reconstruct the terminal thoracic duct via lymphovenous bypass creation was feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lymphedema of the extremities related to oncologic therapies such as cancer surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy is a major long-term cause of morbidity for cancer patients. Both nonsurgical and surgical management strategies have been developed. The goals of these therapies are to achieve volume reduction of the affected extremity, a reduction in patient symptoms, and a reduction in associated morbidities such as recurrent soft-tissue infections. In this article, we review both nonsurgical and surgical management strategies. Traditional surgical therapy has focused on more ablative techniques such as the Charles procedure and suction-assisted lipectomy/liposuction. However, newer more physiologic surgical methods such as lymphovenous anastomoses and vascularized lymph node transfers have become a more common treatment modality for the management of this complex problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lymphedema is a chronic, morbid condition in which the upper or lower extremity experiences swelling and fibrosis due to impaired lymphatic clearance. Among breast cancer patients, this condition is primarily attributed to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) performed for oncologic management. While nonoperative and operative approaches to lymphedema management may be implemented to "manage" this condition, they are typically not curative. Therefore, lymphedema prevention in patients who have undergone ALND is of critical importance. Here, we briefly describe lymphedema and available management strategies, and focus on prevention in patients undergoing ALND using the Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA). Currently available clinical and experimental evidence suggests that LYMPHA may provide protection against the development of lymphedema in carefully selected patients. This procedure can serve as an adjunct surgical option for patients at the time of ALND. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lymphedema—the accumulation of fluid in tissues, usually in the upper and lower extremities—often results from lymph node dissection or radiation and can cause painful and debilitating swelling that may interfere with a patient's daily living activities and quality of life. The goal of treatment for lymphedema is to reduce the volume of fluid in the affected area. Lymphedema is staged according to presenting characteristics, and interventions may be surgical or nonsurgical, such as complex decongestive therapy. Lymphovenous bypass is a surgical procedure performed for the management of lymphedema and involves rerouting microvascular channels to allow for the drainage of fluid that has accumulated in the lymphatic tissue of the upper or lower extremities. It requires supermicrosurgery techniques because of the small size of the vessels being anastomosed. Perioperative nursing implications for lymphovenous bypass include OR preparation and providing emotional support for patients living with lymphedema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background  Lymphedema is an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces resulting from impairment in the lymphatic circulation that can impair quality of life and cause considerable morbidity. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) has an overall incidence rate of 20%. Conservative therapies are the first step in treatment of LEL; however, they do not provide a cure because they fail to address the underlying physiologic dysfunction of the lymphatic system. Among several surgical alternatives, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has gained popularity due to its improved outcomes and less invasive approach. This study aims to review the published literature on LVA for LEL treatment and to analyze the surgical outcomes. Methods  PubMed database was used to perform a comprehensive literature review of all articles describing LVA for treatment of LEL from Novemeber 1985 to June 2019. Search terms included "lymphovenous" OR "lymphaticovenous" AND "bypass" OR "anastomosis" OR "shunt" AND "lower extremity lymphedema." Results  A total of 95 articles were identified in the initial query, out of which 58 individual articles were deemed eligible. The studies included in this review describe notable variations in surgical techniques, number of anastomoses, and supplementary interventions. All, except one study, reported positive outcomes based on limb circumference and volume changes or subjective clinical improvement. The largest reduction rate in limb circumference and volume was 63.8%. Conclusion  LVA demonstrated a considerable reduction in limb volume and improvement in subjective findings of lymphedema in the majority of patients. The maintained effectiveness of this treatment modality in long-term follow-up suggests great efficacy of LVA in LEL treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Background We report our clinical experience of a supraclavicular lymph node flap (LNF) using a novel method of harvesting based on the compartimental lymphatic and vascular anatomy of the right posterior neck triangle, which allows to harvest two independent LNFs from the same donor site. Patients and methods We report a case series of 10 consecutive patients affected by cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema, who underwent compartimental dual LNF transfer from the right supraclavicular area to the affected lower limb, from August 2015 to March 2017. The superficial compartment flap (venous flap along the external jugular vein) was anastomosed in a flow-through fashion along the course of the great saphenous vein in the knee region, whereas the deep compartment flap (transverse cervical artery/vein flap) was anastomosed in an end-to-end fashion to the medial sural artery and comitantes vein. Flap viability was checked by color Doppler ultrasound postoperatively. Patients were assessed preoperatively and underwent follow-up at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Data were prospectively collected. Results All the flaps resulted to be viable. No major postoperative complications were observed neither at the donor nor at the recipient sites. Patients did not report dysesthesia of the homoteral chest. An overall reduction in the lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) index (mean ± SD: 33.7 ± 22.5) and an improvement in the lymph flow and tracer appearance time at postoperative lymphoscintigraphy were observed. All the patients reported an improved quality of life after surgery. Conclusions Compartimental supraclavicular dual LNF harvest seems promising in the treatment of peripheral lymphedema. Sparing of supraclavicular nerves might reduce the morbidity associated with the conventional surgical approach. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. Level of Evidence IV, therapeutic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The analysis of long-term results of reconstructive-plastic surgeries in patients with secondary lymphostaisis of upper extremities has been presented. When conservative treatment is ineffective, surgery is a method of choice for these patients. The extent of surgery depends on the extent of edema (from lymphovenous bypass to the total dermosubdermofasciectomy of the whole extremity with single-stage split thickness skin graft reconstruction).

Background  Venules have been usually neglected in the literature on lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). The aim of this study was to analyze the flow dynamic of recipient venules in LVA and their impact on the surgical outcomes. Patients and Methods  Data from 128 patients affected by extremity lymphedema, who underwent LVA, were collected in two institutions from August 2014 to May 2016. Recipient venules were classified according to their flow dynamic into backflow, slack, and outlet (BSO classification). Quantitative (lower extremity lymphedema/upper extremity lymphedema index) and qualitative outcomes (needing of compression garment and compression garment class) were evaluated. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables and independent-samples t -test for continuous variables. The association between lymphatic collector degeneration status (normal, ectasis, contractile, sclerotic type [NECST]) and BSO classification with the outcomes was analyzed by the Mantel–Haenszel test. Results  On a total of 128 patients, 37 suffered from upper and 91 from lower limb lymphedema. An average number of four LVA were performed for each patient (range: 2–8). A significant association was observed between NECST and BSO categories and the outcomes were evaluated. Patients with contractile and sclerotic collectors had 2.24 times the odd of having poor composite outcome compared with those with normal-to-ectasis collectors (p  < 0.05). Patients with backflow venules had 3.32 times the odd of having poor composite outcome compared with those without outlet or slack pattern (p  < 0.05). Conclusion  The subtype of recipient venule flow dynamic has a significant impact on the surgical outcome of patients undergoing LVA for the treatment of lymphedema, regardless of the lymphatic collector degeneration status. Locating favorable venules in the preoperative mapping might enhance the surgical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The field of lymphedema surgery has witnessed tremendous advancements over the years and has been coupled to the rapid growth of supermicrosurgical techniques. A lymphovenous bypass or lymphaticovenular anastomosis is a new technique that requires identification of patent, residual lymphatic channels and performing an anastomosis to a recipient venule, thereby allowing outflow of lymphatic fluid and improvement in a patient's lymphedema. This article provides a summary of the maturation of the technique, as well as the technical aspects of the approach and the current outcomes in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lymphedema affects up to 1 in 6 patients who undergo treatment for a solid tumor in the United States. Its prevalence has increased as more effective oncologic therapies have improved patient survival, but there remains no definitive cure. Recent research has elucidated new details in the pathogenesis of the disease and has demonstrated that it is fundamentally an immunologic process that ultimately results in inflammation, fibroadipose deposition, impaired lymphangiogenesis, and dysfunctional lymphatic pumping. These findings have allowed for the development of novel medical and surgical therapies that may potentially alter the standard of care for a disease that has largely been treated by compression. This review seeks to provide an overview of the emerging therapies and how they can be utilized for effective management of lymphedema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Breast cancer–related lymphedema affects more than 400,000 survivors in the United States. In 2009, lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) was first described as a surgical technique to prevent lymphedema by bypassing divided arm lymphatics into adjacent veins at the time of an axillary lymph node dissection. We describe the first animal model of LYMPHA. Methods In Yorkshire pigs, each distal hind limb lymphatic system was cannulated and injected with a different fluorophore (human serum albumin–conjugated indocyanine green or Evans Blue). Fluorescence-assisted resection and exploration imaging system was used to map the respective lymphangiosomes to the groin. Baseline lymphatic clearance of each hind limb lymphangiosome was obtained by measuring the fluorescence of each dye from centrally obtained blood samples. A lymphadenectomy versus lymphadenectomy with LYMPHA was then performed. The injections were then repeated to obtain clearance rates that were compared against baseline values. Results Human serum albumin–conjugated indocyanine green and Evans Blue allowed for precise lymphatic mapping of each respective hind limb using fluorescence-assisted resection and exploration imaging. Lymphatic clearance from the distal hind limb dropped 68% when comparing baseline clearance versus after a groin lymphadenectomy. In comparison, lymphatic clearance dropped only 21% when comparing baseline clearance versus a lymphadenectomy with LYMPHA. Conclusions We describe the first animal model for LYMPHA, which will enable future studies to further evaluate the efficacy and potential limitations of this technique. Of equal importance, we demonstrate the power of optical imaging to provide real-time lymphatic clearance rates for each hind limb. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema impacts 30% to 47% of women who undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Studies evaluating the effectiveness of prophylactic lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND have had small patient populations and/or short follow-up. The aim of this study is to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate prophylactic LVB in patients with breast cancer., Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ALND from 2018 to 2022 was performed. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they underwent prophylactic LVB at the time of ALND. Primary outcomes included 30-day complications and lymphedema. Lymphedema was quantitatively evaluated by bioimpedance analysis, with L-dex scores >7.1 indicating lymphedema., Results: One-hundred five patients were identified. Sixty-four patients (61.0%) underwent ALND and 41 patients (39.0%) underwent ALND+LVB. Postoperative complications were similar between the cohorts. At a median follow-up of 13.3 months, lymphedema occurred significantly higher in the ALND only group compared with ALND+LVB group (50.0% vs 12.2%; P < 0.001). ALND without LVB was an independent risk factor for lymphedema development (odds ratio, 4.82; P = 0.003)., Conclusions: Prophylactic LVB decreases lymphedema and is not associated with increased postoperative complications. A multidisciplinary team approach is imperative to decrease lymphedema development in this patient population., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Lymphedema is a common complication of lymph node surgery; however, evidence on diagnosing, monitoring, and treating the condition is sparse. This meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of common surgical treatments of lymphedema and provides suggestions for future research directions., Methods: A review of PubMed and Embase was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All English-language studies published through June 1, 2020, were included. We excluded nonsurgical interventions, literature reviews, letters, commentaries, nonhuman or cadaver studies, and studies with inadequate sample size (N < 20)., Results: A total of 583 cases from 15 studies in patients with lymphedema met our inclusion criteria for our 1-arm meta-analysis: 387 upper extremity treatments and 196 lower extremity treatments. The volume reduction rates of lymphedema for upper extremity and lower extremity treatments were 38.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 25.9%-50.2%] and 49.5% (95% CI, 32.6%-66.3%), respectively. The most common postoperative complications were cellulitis, reported in 4.5% of patients (95% CI, 0.9%-10.6%), and seromas, reported in 4.6% (95% CI, 0%-17.8%) of patients. Average quality of life measures across all studies improved by 52.2% (95% CI, 25.1%-79.2%) for patients who underwent upper extremity treatment., Conclusions: Surgical management of lymphedema shows great promise. Our data suggest that adopting a standardized system of limb measurement and disease staging can increase effectiveness of treatment outcomes.