Search

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To evaluate the outcomes and reoperation rates in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing lumbar anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). Background. AVBT is a viable option for growing children. The benefit of motion preservation must be balanced by a higher reoperation rate. A paucity of reports has addressed lumbar AVBT. Materials and Methods. A single-center retrospective study was conducted to identify all patients who underwent lumbar AVBT (lowest instrumented vertebra L3 or L4) with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Clinical and radiographic parameters, including complications and reoperations, were also collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test for qualitative variables. Results. From a data set of 551 patients, we identified 106 patients (89% female) who underwent a lumbar AVBT (33 lumbar only, 73 bilateral thoracic/lumbar) with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 1.6 years at which point 85% (90/106) had reached skeletal maturity. Preoperatively, these patients were skeletally immature (age: 12.8 ± 1.3 yr, Sanders: 3.3 ± 0.8, R = 0.6 ± 0.9) with a lumbar coronal curve angle of 49.6° ± 11.2° which corrected to 19.9° ± 11.2° (P < 0.0001) at most recent follow-up. At the latest follow-up, 76.4% (81/106) of the patients harbored a coronal curve angle of <30°. Twenty patients (18.9%) underwent 23 reoperations, with overcorrection being the most common (10/23, 43%). Broken tethers led to reoperation in 3 instances (3/23, 13%). Six patients in the cohort needed a posterior spinal fusion (6/106, 5.4%). Conclusions. Vertebral body tethering is a viable treatment option for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. This report is the largest to date for lumbar AVBT, highlighting that 84% of patients harbored a curve <35° at the latest follow-up but with an 18.9% reoperation rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To examine the shape change of screw-rod constructs over time after short-segment lumbar interbody fusion and to clarify its relationship to clinical characteristics. Summary of Background Data. No study has focused on the shape change of screw-rod constructs after short-segment fusion and its clinical implications. Methods. One hundred eight patients who had single-level lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws and cages were enrolled. Three-dimensional (3D) images of screw-rod constructs were generated from baseline CT on the day after surgery and followup CT and were superposed on the right and left side, respectively, using the iterative closest point algorithm. The shape change was quantitatively assessed by computing the median distance between the 3D images, which was defined as the shape change value. Among the 5 time-course categories of follow-up CT (=1, 2-3, 4-6, 7-12, and =13 months), the shape change values were compared. The relationships between the shape change values and clinical characteristics, such as age, CT-derived vertebral bone mineral density, screw and rod materials, and postoperative interbody fusion status, cage subsidence, and screw loosening, were evaluated. Results. A total of 237 follow-up CTs were included (=1 [34 scans], 2-3 [33 scans], 4-6 [80 scans], 7-12 [48 scans], and = 13 months [42 scans]) because many patients underwent multiple follow-up CTs. There were significant differences in shape change values among the time-course categories (P<0.001 in Kruskal-Wallis test). Most shape changes occurred within 6 months postoperatively, with no significant changes observed at 7 months or more. There were no significant relationships between the shape change values and each clinical characteristic. Conclusions. The temporal shape changes of screw-rod constructs following short-segment lumbar interbody fusion progressed up to 6 months after surgery but not significantly thereafter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many people experience low back pain caused by degenerative disease of the lumbar spine; this includes spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc degeneration, and disc herniation. Conservative management of degenerative disease, which includes physical therapy, lifestyle modifications, and medications, is the initial approach. If this approach fails, a surgical procedure may be the next step. Previously, open lumbar surgery would have been the planned procedure; today, minimally invasive spine surgery gives patients another choice. Perioperative nurses should understand how minimally invasive spine surgery differs from the open procedure, the steps involved during a minimally invasive procedure, the benefits of this type of procedure, and nursing considerations for patients undergoing minimally invasive spinal procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Competitive swimmers are at high risk of overuse musculoskeletal injuries due to their high training volumes. Spine injuries are the second most common musculoskeletal injury in swimmers and are often a result of the combination of improper technique, high loads on the spine in strokes that require hyperextension, and repetitive overuse leading to fatigue of the supporting trunk muscles. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding swimming biomechanics, stroke techniques, and common injuries in the lumbar spine to promote a discussion on the prevention and rehabilitation of lower back injuries in competitive swimmers. Evidence Acquisition: From a PUBMED/MEDLINE search, 16 articles were identified for inclusion using the search terms "swimming," "low back" or "lumbar," and "injury" or "injuries." Study Design: Narrative review. Level of Evidence: Levels 4 and 5. Results: The trunk muscles are integral to swimming stroke biomechanics. In freestyle and backstroke, the body roll generated by the paraspinal and abdominal muscles is integral to efficient stroke mechanics by allowing synergistic movements of the upper and lower extremities. In butterfly and breaststroke, the undulating wave like motion of the dolphin kick requires dynamic engagement of the core to generate repetitive flexion and extension of the spine and is a common mechanism for hyperextension injuries. The most common lower back injuries in swimming were determined to be lumbar strain, spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, facet joint pain, and disc disease. Most overuse swimming injuries can be treated conservatively with physical therapy and training adjustments. Conclusion: Managing swimmers with low back pain requires a basic knowledge of swimming technique and a focus on prevention-based care. Since most swimming injuries are secondary to overuse, it is important for providers to understand the mechanisms underlying the swimming injury, including an understanding of the biomechanics involved in swimming and the role of spine involvement in the 4 strokes that assist in stabilization and force generation in the water. Knowledge of the biomechanics involved in swimming and the significant demands placed on the spinal musculoskeletal system will aid the clinician in the diagnosis and management of injuries and assist in the development of a proper rehabilitation program aimed at correction of any abnormal swimming mechanics, treatment of pain, and future injury prevention. Strength of Recommendations: B. Recommendation based on limited quality or inconsistent patient-oriented evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: To explore the complications and risk factors for total resection (TR) of primary thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors over the past decade at our institution. Methods: Patients meeting inclusion criteria (primary spinal tumors, thoracic or lumbar location, TR at our center) were included. Demographic characteristics, surgical data, perioperative complications and management results were reviewed. Patients were stratified by tumor site, the number of excised segments, and recurrence status to elucidate distinctive characteristics. Results: The cohort comprised 103 patients, with a mean age of 35.8 years. On average, 1.83 vertebral segments were resected per patient. Perioperative complications were substantial, totaling 166 events, with 71 classified as major and 95 as minor, yielding an average of 1.61 complications per patient. No perioperative deaths occurred, but 79 patients (76.7%) experienced at least one complication. Multiple vertebral sections correlated with a higher complication rate (P = 0.031), and lumbar surgeries exhibited elevated risks of large vascular injury (P = 0.001), neurological deterioration, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared to thoracic cases. Conversely, thoracic spinal procedures showed a higher rate of pleural effusion (P = 0.004). Binary logistics stepwise regression identified multi-segmental resection as the independent risk factor for major perioperative complications. Conclusions: TR of primary spinal tumors is associated with a high perioperative complication rate, although most events have a favorable prognosis. Complication characteristics vary based on the surgical site, number of excised segments, and surgical history. A nuanced preoperative evaluating approach considering patient age, surgical segments, and extent of resection is crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Objective Method Results Conclusion Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) technique requires a very precise entry point of the Jamshidi needle, which leads to repeated adjustments, damaging the pedicle and increasing radiation exposure. This study was designed to propose an improved percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique‐trajectory dynamic adjustment (TDA) technique, and evaluate its feasibility and assess the clinical outcomes.A total of 445 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis associated with instability from June 2017 to May 2022 were included in the retrospective study. They were randomly separated into two groups. Two hundred thirty‐one patients underwent TDA technique (TDA group). Two hundred fourteen patients underwent traditional PPSF technique (PPSF group). All patients underwent postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of screw placement, superior facet joint violation (FJV). The evaluated clinical outcomes were needle insertion time, radiation exposure, blood loss, hospital stay, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for lower back pain (LBP), and leg pain, lumbar interbody fusion rate, and postoperative complications. The independent‐sample t test and paired t‐test were used for continuous data. The contingency table and Mann–Whitney U test were used for categorical data.The time of the insertion in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the fluoroscopy frequency in TDA group was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of clinically acceptable screws between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the lateral screw misplacement in TDA group was higher. Moreover, FJV rate was significantly lower than that in PPSF group (p < 0.05). In both TDA group and PPSF group, postoperative back and leg pain and the JOA score were significantly improved (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the pre‐ and postoperative VAS score for back and leg pain and the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, intervertebral fusion rate, and complications rate between the two groups (p > 0.05).Compared to traditional PPSF technique, TDA technique is a safer and more effective procedure which has shorter surgical time, lower radiation exposure, and lower facet joint violation rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To determine the impact of psoas muscle health [crosssectional area (CSA)] on achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following laminectomy for patients with predominant back pain (PBP) and leg pain (PLP). Summary of Background Data. Psoas muscle health is linked to postoperative outcomes in decompression patients, with MRIbased grading of psoas CSA correlating with these outcomes. However, evidence on its impact on symptomatic recovery, measured by PROMs, is lacking. Methods. One hundred six patients with PBP (VAS back > VAS leg) and 139 patients with PLP (VAS leg > VAS back) who underwent laminectomy from 2017 to 2021 were included. Axial T2 MRI images were analyzed for psoas CSA using a validated method. Based on the lowest-quartile normalized total psoas area (NTPA) thresholds, patients were divided into "good" and "poor" muscle health groups. The correlation analyses were performed between the psoas CSA and changes in PROMs. Kaplan--Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine the probability of achieving MCID as a function of time. Results. Of 106 patients with PBP, 83 (78.3%) had good muscle health, and 23 (21.6%) had poor muscle health. Of 139 patients with PLP, 54 (38.8%) had good muscle health, and 85 (61.1%) had poor muscle health. In the PBP group, older age was associated with poor muscle health (69.70± 9.26 vs. 59.92 ± 15.01, P= 0.0002). For both cohorts, there were no differences in the rate of MCID achievement for any PROMs between the good and poor muscle health groups. In the PBP group, Kaplan-- Meier analysis showed patients with good psoas health achieved MCID-VAS back and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in median times of 14 and 42 days (P=0.045 and 0.015), respectively. Conclusion. Good psoas muscle health is linked to faster attainment of MCID, especially in patients with PBP compared with PLP after decompression surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the 2-year reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease between patients with pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch postoperatively and patients with normal PI-LL measurements. Patients undergoing elective 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Spinopelvic radiographic parameters immediately postoperation were measured, and PI-LL mismatch was determined using the age-adjusted thresholds defined in Lafage et al. After propensity score matching, early reoperation rates were compared between the PI-LL mismatch and normal PI-LL cohorts. Early reoperation was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring reoperation within 2 years of the index surgery. A total of 219 patients were identified. The average age was 59 years of age, with 59.8% female. The PI-LL mismatch cohort (n = 148) was younger (57.5 vs. 63.5 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of Black patients (31.8% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.001) than the normal PI-LL cohort, respectively. A total of 100 patients in the PI-LL mismatch cohort were propensity score matched to 66 patients in the normal PI-LL cohort, resulting in no difference in age (P = 0.177), sex (P = 0.302), race (P = 0.727), or body mass index (P = 0.892). Using these matched cohorts, the rate of early reoperation for ASD was 8.0% in the PI-LL mismatch cohort and 9.1% in the normal PI-LL cohort (P = 0.805), with a mean time to reoperation of 1.28 and 1.33 years, respectively. After propensity score matching, PI-LL mismatch was not associated with early reoperation for ASD in patients undergoing 1- to 2-level lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) seen in conjunction with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are well-described radiographic findings. Several studies suggest their presence may be a negative prognostic indicator of postoperative outcome. Our hypothesis was that severe RNR (informally known as the spaghetti sign [SS]) can serve as a reliable marker of LSS that would benefit from surgical decompression. We sought to evaluate a grading scale for RNR, characterize the association with stenosis, and investigate the clinical implications of RNR. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 72 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery from 2016 to 2018 at 1 institution. Preoperative T2 magnetic resonance imaging scans were graded by 3 reviewers for severity of stenosis (0–4), severity of RNR (0–3), and rostral versus caudal RNR. SS was defined as RNR score ≥2 (clear-cut or marked nerve root irregularity). Preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index scores were analyzed by stenosis and RNR severity. Seventy-one (98%) patients had severe stenosis (score ≥3) and 25 (35%) had a SS. SS was 100% specific for high-grade stenosis. If patients had a SS, it was more likely rostral (P = 0.02). Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index scores improved significantly, but there were no differences related to RNR score, presence of SS, or stenosis severity. The study demonstrated that there is a significant association between SS and severe LSS and that presence of RNR is not a negative prognostic indicator for postoperative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study investigated the variability in lumbar neuromuscular adaptations to pain, the task dependency of pain adaptations and the effect of these adaptations on motor performance. Methods: Twenty-four healthy participants performed isometric back extension contractions at 45° and 90° trunk flexion under pain-free and experimental low back pain conditions induced by electrical stimulation. High-density surface electromyography recorded lumbar muscle activation strategies, and force steadiness was measured using a load cell. Results: While considerable variability in neuromuscular adaptations to lumbar pain was observed among participants, consistent patterns were found between tasks. In the 90° trunk flexion position, both sides exhibited greater magnitudes of pain adaptations for muscle activity redistribution in the mediolateral axis (p < 0.05, 86% increase) and muscle activity amplitude (p < 0.001, 183% increase) compared to the 45° trunk flexion position. A significant negative correlation was found between the magnitude of the mediolateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity and force steadiness on the left side (p = 0.045). Discussion: These findings highlight the intricate and task-dependent nature of neuromuscular adaptations to pain within lumbar muscles, and points toward a potential trade-off between pain adaptations and performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), performed using a retroperitoneal approach, can lead to complications related to the approach, such as lumbar sympathetic chain injury (LSCI). Although LSCI is a common complication of OLIF, its reported incidence varies across studies due to an absence of specific diagnostic criteria. Moreover, research on the risk factors of postoperative sympathetic chain injuries after OLIF remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the incidence, and identify independent risk factors for LSCI, in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases who underwent OLIF. Methods: Between October 2020 and August 2023, a retrospective review was conducted at our institute on 200 patients who underwent OLIF at 1 to 4 consecutive spinal levels (L1–5) for degenerative spinal diseases including spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis. We excluded those with infections, trauma, tumors, and lower extremity edema/warmth due to other causes. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with and without LSCI symptoms. Demographic data, operative data, and pre- and postoperative parameters were evaluated for their association with LSCI using a univariate logistic regression model. Variables with a p-value <0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate model to identify the independent risk factors. Results: Thirty-five of 200 patients (17.5%) developed LSCI symptoms after OLIF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that prolonged retraction time, particularly exceeding 31.5 miniutes, remained an independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 12.59; p<0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that prolonged retraction time was an independent risk factor for LSCI following OLIF, particularly when it exceeded 31.5 minutes. Protecting the lumbar sympathetic chain during surgery and minimizing retraction time are crucial to avoiding LSCI following OLIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability globally, and the diagnosis of LBP is challenging for clinicians. Objective: Using new software called Therapha, this study aimed to assess the accuracy level of artificial intelligence as a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) compared to MRI in predicting lumbar disc herniated patients. Methods: One hundred low back pain patients aged ≥18 years old were included in the study. The study was conducted in three stages. Firstly, a case series was conducted by matching MRI and Therapha diagnosis for 10 patients. Subsequently, Delphi methodology was employed to establish a clinical consensus. Finally, to determine the accuracy of the newly developed software, a cross-sectional study was undertaken involving 100 patients. Results: The software showed a significant diagnostic accuracy with the area under the curve in the ROC analysis determined as 0.84 with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 80%. Conclusions: The study's findings revealed that CDSS using Therapha has a reasonable level of efficacy, and this can be utilized clinically to acquire a faster and more accurate screening of patients with lumbar disc herniation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Zygapophysial joints (Z joints) can be a source of back pain and of neck pain, but the cause of pain is not known. Some authors attribute the pain to osteoarthritis but without citing evidence. Objectives The present review was undertaken to determine if there was sufficient evidence of association between spinal pain and osteoarthritis of Z joints to justify osteoarthritis being held to be the cause of pain. The null hypothesis was that osteoarthritis of Z joints does not cause back pain or neck pain. Eligibility criteria Relevant studies were ones that provided primary data on the association between pain and osteoarthritis of Z joints. These could be population studies, diagnostic studies, or case-control studies. Sources of evidence The database of PubMed was searched using the terms: Lumbar or cervical, zygapophysial or facet, pain, and osteoarthritis or degeneration or degenerative. Charting methods Data pertinent to the research question were extracted from original articles and tabulated for reporting. Odds ratios for associations were calculated, as were the prevalence rates of osteoarthritis in subjects with pain, and conversely the prevalence rates of pain in subjects with osteoarthritis. Results The searches retrieved 11 population studies, 4 diagnostic studies, and 3 cases control studies. No study showed any positive association between osteoarthritis of Z joints and pain. All studies found pain to be independent of the presence or severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis was as common in subjects with no pain as in subjects with pain. The null hypothesis was not refuted. Conclusion The published evidence does not support the belief that osteoarthritis causes Z joint pain. All the evidence contradicts this belief. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Quality of life (QoL) may be affected due to various reasons such as low back or leg pains with accompanying neurologic problems. Lumbar disk surgery is one of the most common performed surgeries to relieve those symptoms. Various anesthetic techniques can be used safely to perform lumbar disk surgeries. Properties that make an anesthetic technique good are mainly the quick onset and returning of the effects. This large retrospective study with patients who have undergone lumbar disk surgery under spinal anesthesia aims to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative parameters of the spinal anesthesia and review the literature. Methods Cases operated under spinal anesthesia between January 2017 and December 2020 were investigated, and 617 patients who underwent simple lumbar disk surgery were included in the study. Demographic characteristics and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of the patients were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) and QoLscores were obtained before and after the operation. Results There were 282 (45.7%) male and 335 (54.3%) female patients with a mean age of 39.48 ± 16.71 years (range: 18–58 years) at symptom onset. The mean operating time was 46.3 minutes (range: 22–68 minutes). Average blood loss was 85 mL (range: 55–125 mL). All the patients were mobilized 6 to 12 hours after surgery. In our patient group, there were both high- and normal-risk groups in terms of the ASA physical status. During the clinical follow-up, a statistically significant improvement was found for the VAS and QoL scores (p < 0.05). Conclusions In this large retrospective study, our results have confirmed that spinal anesthesia is at least comparable to general anesthesia and even superior to it in some aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As value-based health care arrangements gain traction in spine care, understanding the true cost of care becomes critical. Historically, inaccurate cost proxies have been used, including negotiated reimbursement rates or list prices. However, time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) allows for a more accurate cost assessment, including a better understanding of the primary drivers of cost in 1-level lumbar fusion. To determine the variation of total hospital cost, differences in characteristics between high-cost and nonhigh-cost patients, and to identify the primary drivers of total hospital cost in a sample of patients undergoing 1-level lumbar fusion. Retrospective, multicenter (one academic medical center, one community-based hospital), observational study. A total of 383 patients undergoing elective 1-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spine conditions between November 2, 2021 and December 2, 2022. Total hospital cost of care (normalized); preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative cost of care (normalized); ratio of most to least expensive 1-level lumbar fusion. Patients undergoing a 1-level lumbar fusion between November 2, 2021 and December 2, 2022 were identified at two hospitals (one quaternary referral academic medical center and one community-based hospital) within our health system. TDABC was used to calculate total hospital cost, which was also broken up into: pre-, intra-, and postoperative timeframes. Operating surgeon and patient characteristics were also collected and compared between high- and nonhigh-cost patients. The correlation of surgical time and cost was determined. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine factors associated with total hospital cost. The most expensive 1-level lumbar fusion was 6.8x more expensive than the least expensive 1-level lumbar fusion, with the intraoperative period accounting for 88% of total cost. On average. the implant cost accounted for 30% of the total, but across the patient sample, the implant cost accounted for a range of 6% to 44% of the total cost. High-cost patients were younger (55 years [SD: 13 years] vs 63 years [SD: 13 years], p=.0002), more likely to have commercial health insurance (24 out of 38 (63%) vs 181 out of 345 (52%), p=.003). There was a poor correlation between time of surgery (ie, incision to close) and total overall cost (ρ:.26, p<.0001). Increase age (RC: -0.003 [95% CI: -0.006 to -0.000007], p=.049) was associated with decreased cost. Surgery by certain surgeons was associated with decreased total cost when accounting for other factors (p<.05). A large variation exists in the total hospital cost for patients undergoing 1-level lumbar fusion, which is primarily driven by surgeon-level decisions and preferences (eg, implant and technology use). Also, being a "fast" surgeon intraoperatively does not mean your total cost is meaningfully lower. As efforts continue to optimize patient value through ensuring appropriate clinical outcomes while also reducing cost, spine surgeons must use this knowledge to lead, or at least be active participants in, any discussions that could impact patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Objectives: This study compares supine vs bending flexibility radiographs and evaluates their ability to predict residual postoperative lumbar curvature after selective thoracic fusion for Lenke 1 and 2 curves across different lumbar modifiers (A, B, and C) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: This was a retrospective review of AIS Lenke 1 and 2 patients who underwent posterior fusion. All patients had preoperative flexibility radiographs including side-bending and supine posteroanterior (PA) films, in addition to pre- and post-operative standing PA and lateral radiographs. We used SurgiMap 2.0 software for all radiographic measurements. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were developed in SAS. Results: A total of 86 patients were included mean age 14.9 years and follow-up 72.3 months. Preoperative supine lumbar Cobb angle and preoperative side-bending Cobb angles had similar, positive correlations with postoperative lumbar Cobb angle, r =.55 (P <.001) and r =.54 (P <.001), respectively. Three regression models were built to predict postoperative lumbar Cobb angles from preoperative information: Model S (R2 =.39) uses preoperative supine lumbar curve; Model B (R2 =.44) uses preoperative side-bending lumbar curve; Model SB (R2 =.49) uses both preoperative supine and side-bending lumbar curves. Model S and B performed just as well as Model SB. Conclusion: Either supine or side-bending radiographs alone may be used to estimate mean residual postoperative lumbar curvature after selective posterior thoracic fusion, but little is to be gained by taking both supine and side-bending radiographs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trunk position and experimental lumbar pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies. Nineteen healthy participants (10 men and 9 women), aged 25.3 ± 4.7 yr, performed isometric back extension contractions in three positions (neutral, 45°, and 90° trunk flexion) and under three conditions (no pain, caudal pain, and cranial pain). Lumbar muscle activation strategies were recorded using high-density surface electromyography. The effect of position and pain condition on muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistributions was assessed. Muscle activity amplitude was 43% higher in 45° trunk flexion than in neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05). In the 90° trunk flexion, participants showed a more lateral spatial distribution than in the 45° trunk flexion on the left side (P < 0.01, 5.4 mm difference) and the neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05, 8.2 mm difference). In the 45° trunk flexion, participants exhibited a more lateral spatial distribution compared with the neutral position on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.7 mm difference). A lateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity was observed in the caudal pain condition compared with the no pain condition on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.0 mm difference). Individual responses to pain varied across all variables. Different trunk positions result in different distributions of activation within the lumbar extensor muscles, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage. No clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation were found, whereas individual-specific adaptations were observed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Changes in muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistribution of lumbar extensor muscles were observed in different trunk positions, potentially due to changes in their mechanical advantage. The results complement the current pain-adaptation theory by illustrating individual spatial redistributions of activation within lumbar extensor muscles during pain. The study found no clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a passive back-support exosuit at reducing low back muscle fatigue during an 18-minute trunk posture maintenance task. On two separate days sixteen participants performed an 18-minute trunk posture profile that reflected trunk flexion postures observed during a challenging vascular surgery procedure. On one day they performed the procedure with the support of the exosuit, on the other day without. Test contractions were performed every three minutes to capture the time-dependent electromyographic activity of the bilateral erector spinae muscles. Time domain (amplitude) and frequency domain (median frequency) measures of erector spinae muscle fatigue were assessed. Results revealed that the exosuit significantly reduced the measures of erector spinae muscle fatigue in terms of both amplitude (6.1%) and median frequency (5.3%), demonstrating a fatigue reduction benefit of the exosuit in a realistic surgical posture maintenance task. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: To examine the potential adoption of a back-support exosuit system in the surgical environment, this study used an 18-minute posture maintenance task that reflected trunk flexion postures observed during a vascular surgery procedure and suggests that the exosuit system can effectively reduce low back muscle fatigue during a vascular surgical procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Study design Retrospective cohort study. Purpose To explore the complications and risk factors for total resection (TR) of primary thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors over the past decade at our institution. Methods Patients meeting inclusion criteria (primary spinal tumors, thoracic or lumbar location, TR at our center) were included. Demographic characteristics, surgical data, perioperative complications and management results were reviewed. Patients were stratified by tumor site, the number of excised segments, and recurrence status to elucidate distinctive characteristics. Results The cohort comprised 103 patients, with a mean age of 35.8 years. On average, 1.83 vertebral segments were resected per patient. Perioperative complications were substantial, totaling 166 events, with 71 classified as major and 95 as minor, yielding an average of 1.61 complications per patient. No perioperative deaths occurred, but 79 patients (76.7%) experienced at least one complication. Multiple vertebral sections correlated with a higher complication rate (P = 0.031), and lumbar surgeries exhibited elevated risks of large vascular injury (P = 0.001), neurological deterioration, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared to thoracic cases. Conversely, thoracic spinal procedures showed a higher rate of pleural effusion (P = 0.004). Binary logistics stepwise regression identified multi-segmental resection as the independent risk factor for major perioperative complications. Conclusions TR of primary spinal tumors is associated with a high perioperative complication rate, although most events have a favorable prognosis. Complication characteristics vary based on the surgical site, number of excised segments, and surgical history. A nuanced preoperative evaluating approach considering patient age, surgical segments, and extent of resection is crucial.

Background: Lumbar microdiscectomy is a surgical procedure that is frequently used in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar herniation. Differences in outcomes following primary and revision lumbar microdiscectomy have been previously studied, with reports of comparably satisfactory results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. In this study, we further investigate these outcomes, including length of stay, bleeding events, and durotomy. We hypothesized that length of stay, incidence of bleeding events, and dural tear would be greater in the revision cohort. Methods: The ACS-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing single-level primary and revision lumbar microdiscectomy between 2019 and 2022. Eligibility for inclusion was determined by age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 63030 and 63042. Patients with preoperative sepsis or cancer were excluded. Length of stay, wound infection, bleeding events requiring transfusion, cerebrospinal fluid leak, dural tear, and neurological injury were compared between the cohorts. Multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for demographics and comorbidities, including age, sex, race, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension, was used to determine if revision was predictive of complications. Results: A total of 37,669 patients were included, of whom 3,635 (9.6%) required revision surgery. Patients in the revision cohort were older (54.25 ± 15.7 vs. 50.85 ± 16.0 years, P < 0.001) and had higher proportions of male (59.0% vs. 55.7%, P < 0.001) and non-Hispanic White patients (82.0% vs. 77.4%, P < 0.001). Length of stay (1.11 ± 2.5 vs. 1.58 ± 2.7, P < 0.001) and rates of wound infection (2.1% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.002) and bleeding events requiring transfusion (1.3% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) were greater in the revision cohort compared to primary patients. Differences in cerebrospinal fluid leak (0.2% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.116), dural tear complication (0.01% vs. 0.01%, P = 0.092), and neurological injury (0.008% vs. 0.006%, P = 0.691) between the revision and primary cohorts were nonsignificant. Poisson log-linear regression adjusted for demographics and comorbidities demonstrated revision as a significant predictor for length of stay (χ2 = 462.95, P < 0.001), wound infection (χ2 = 9.22, P = 0.002), and bleeding events (χ2 = 9.74, P = 0.002), while it was a nonsignificant predictor of cerebrospinal fluid leak (χ2 = 2.61, P = 0.106), dural tear (χ2 = 2.37, P = 0.123), and neurological injury (χ2 = 0.229, P = 0.632). Conclusion: Revision surgery was a significant predictor of increased length of stay, wound infection, and bleeding events requiring transfusion. Surgeons and patients alike should be aware of increased risk for complications following revision lumbar microdiscectomy compared to primary discectomy.

Objective Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), performed using a retroperitoneal approach, can lead to complications related to the approach, such as lumbar sympathetic chain injury (LSCI). Although LSCI is a common complication of OLIF, its reported incidence varies across studies due to an absence of specific diagnostic criteria. Moreover, research on the risk factors of postoperative sympathetic chain injuries after OLIF remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the incidence, and identify independent risk factors for LSCI, in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases who underwent OLIF. Methods Between October 2020 and August 2023, a retrospective review was conducted at our institute on 200 patients who underwent OLIF at 1 to 4 consecutive spinal levels (L1–5) for degenerative spinal diseases including spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis. We excluded those with infections, trauma, tumors, and lower extremity edema/warmth due to other causes. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with and without LSCI symptoms. Demographic data, operative data, and pre- and postoperative parameters were evaluated for their association with LSCI using a univariate logistic regression model. Variables with a p-value

Abstract Background The efficacy and reliability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior open lumbar spine surgery has been demonstrated; however, few randomized controlled trials of lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) in lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic (UBE) surgery have been reported. Methods A total of 120 patients, aged 18 to 65 (who underwent elective lumbar UBE surgery under general anesthesia and exhibited an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I to III) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ESPB group and the Control group. Ultrasound(US)-guided unilateral single-shot 0.25% ropivacaine L-ESPB was performed in the ESPB group, but not in the control group. Postoperative analgesic strategy for all patients: patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA, diluted and dosed with fentanyl alone) was initiated immediately after surgery combined with oral compound codeine phosphate and ibuprofen sustained release tablets (1 tablet containing ibuprofen 200 mg and codeine 13 mg, 1 tablet/q12h) commenced 6 h postoperatively. We collected and compared patient-centred correlates intraoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Results Compared to the control group (n = 56), the ESPB group (n = 58) significantly reduced intraoperative remifentanil consumption (estimated median difference − 280 mcg, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 360 to − 200, p

Background: The diagnosis of lumbar canal stenosis and ectasia is based on the dimensions of the lumbar canal. Midsagittal dimension of a lumbar canal that is

Background: Biomechanical analysis of the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis on radiographs is common in clinical practices including chiropractic, physical therapy, scoliosis-related thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) management, orthopedics, and neurosurgery. Of specific interest is the assessment of pelvic morphology and the relationship between angle of pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis to pain, disability, and clinical treatment of spine conditions. The current state of the literature on the reliability of common methods quantifying these parameters on radiographs is limited. Methods: The objective of this systematic review is to identify and review the available studies on the reliability of different methods of biomechanical analysis of sagittal lumbo-pelvic parameters used in clinical practice. Our review followed the recommendations of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The design of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379873). Results: The search strategy yielded a total of 2387 articles. A total of 1539 articles were screened after deduplication and exclusion by automation tools, leaving 473 full-text articles that were retrieved. After exclusion, 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. The preponderance of the evidence showed good to excellent reliability for biomechanical assessment of sagittal lumbo-pelvic spine alignment. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review of the literature show that sagittal radiographic analysis of spinal biomechanics and alignment of the human lumbo-pelvic spine is a reliable tool for aiding diagnosis and management in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine decrease lumbar lordosis (LL). Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the L5-S1 disc space improves segmental lordosis, LL, and sagittal balance. This study investigated reciprocal changes in spinopelvic alignment after L5-S1 ALIF. A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent L5-S1 ALIF with or without posterior fixation at a single institution (November 1, 2016 to October 1, 2021). Changes in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, proximal LL (L1-L4), distal LL (L4-S1), total LL (L1-S1), segmental lordosis, pelvic incidence–LL mismatch, thoracic kyphosis, cervical lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Forty-eight patients were identified. Immediate postoperative radiographs were obtained at a mean (SD) of 17 (20) days after surgery; delayed radiographs were obtained 184 (82) days after surgery. After surgery, patients had significantly decreased pelvic tilt (15.71° [7.25°] vs. 17.52° [7.67°], P = 0.003) and proximal LL (11.86° [10.67°] vs. 16.03° [10.45°], P < 0.001) and increased sacral slope (39.49° [9.27°] vs. 36.31° [10.39°], P < 0.001), LL (55.35° [13.15°] vs. 51.63° [13.38°], P = 0.001), and distal LL (43.17° [9.33°] vs. 35.80° [8.02°], P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis increased significantly at L5-S1 and decreased significantly at L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5. Lordosis distribution index increased from 72.55 (19.53) to 81.38 (22.83) (P < 0.001). L5-S1 ALIF was associated with increased L5-S1 segmental lordosis accompanied by pelvic anteversion and a reciprocal decrease in proximal LL. These changes may represent a reversal of compensatory mechanisms, suggesting an overall relaxation of spinopelvic alignment after L5-S1 ALIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Incongruity between irregularly shaped vertebral endplates and the uniform surfaces of stock interbody fusion cages has been identified as contributing to cage subsidence, pseudarthrosis, and unpredictable alignment. Advances in manufacturing techniques have driven the development of personalized interbody cages (PICs) that can match individual endplate morphology and provide the exact shape and size needed to fill the disc space and achieve the planned correction. This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to evaluate the implant-endplate contact area, fusion, subsidence, and achievement of planned alignment correction in patients receiving PIC devices. Methods: This retrospective study included patients treated for adult spinal deformity at a single site and implanted with PIC devices at L4 to L5 or L5 to S1 for segmental stabilization and alignment correction, who received 1-year postoperative CT images as part of their standard of care. An evaluation using 3-dimensional thin-section scans was conducted. Implant-endplate contact and signs of fusion were assessed in each CT slice across both endplates. The degree of subsidence as well as measures of segmental and global lumbar alignment were also assessed. Results: Fifteen patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 68.2 years. Follow-up ranged between 9 and 14 months. Twenty-six total lumbar levels were implanted; 20 with PIC devices via the anterior lumbar interbody fusion approach, 2 with stock cages via the anterior lumbar interbody fusion approach, and 4 with PIC devices via the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach. CT analysis of PIC-implanted levels found an overall implant-endplate contact area ratio of 93.9%, a subsidence rate of 4.5%, a fusion rate of 100%, and satisfactory segmental and global lumbar correction compared with the preoperative plan. Conclusions: PIC implants can provide nearly complete contact with endplate surfaces regardless of the individual endplate morphology. Subsidence, fusion, and alignment assessments in this tomographic study illustrated results consistent with the benefits of a personalized interbody implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emerging data have highlighted the significance of planning and aligning total and segmental lumbar lordosis with pelvic morphology when performing short-segment fusion with the goal of reducing the risk of adjacent segment disease while also decreasing spine-related disability. This study evaluates the impact of personalized interbody implants in restoring pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch compared with a similar study using stock interbody implants. Methods: This multicenter retrospective analysis assessed radiographic pre- and postoperative spinopelvic alignment (PI-LL) in patients who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar fusions with personalized interbody implants for degenerative (nondeformity) indications. The aim was to assess the incidence of malalignment (PI-LL = 10°) both before and after fusion surgery and to determine the rate of alignment preservation and/or correction in this population. Results: There were 135 patients included in this study. Of 83 patients who were aligned preoperatively, alignment was preserved in 76 (91.6%) and worsened in 7 (8.4%). Among the 52 preoperatively malaligned patients, alignment was restored in 23 (44.2%), and 29 (55.8%) were not fully corrected. Among patients who were preoperatively aligned, there was no statistically significant difference in either the "preserved" or "worsened" groups between stock devices and personalized interbody devices. In contrast, among patients who were preoperatively malaligned, there was a statistically significant increase in the "restored" group (P = 0.046) and a statistically significant decrease in the "worsened" groups in patients with personalized interbodies compared with historical stock device data (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with a historical cohort with stock implants, personalized interbody implants in short-segment fusions have shown a statistically significant improvement in restoring patients to normative PI-LL. Using 3-dimensional preoperative planning combined with personalized implants provides an important tool for planning and achieving improvement in spinopelvic parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case: An 18-year-old immunocompetent man presented with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis, discharging sinuses, and cold abscess for 3 years treated with multiple incision drainage procedures with cottonoid packing antibiotic therapy. Radiographic imaging showed a soft tissue mass in the canal causing bony destruction. Postoperative histopathological examination showed an Aspergillus fungal ball. Patient showed improvement at 6-month follow-up with medical management. Conclusion: As far as we know, this is the first case report showing an aspergilloma involving the vertebral column. Inadequate antibiotic treatment and blind introduction of a foreign body into sinus tracts can lead to fungal infections mimicking tuberculosis, causing disastrous outcomes. Fungal cultures are recommended routinely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Aim Methods Results Conclusion Herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) with radiculopathy is a common degenerative spine disorder. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is one of the pain relief treatments for lumbar radiculopathy recommended by evidence‐based guidelines. Adequate contrast distribution is correlated with better pain control, but the best approach has not been confirmed yet.To confirm the distribution of contrast medium injected with a new approach of TFESI, that is, far lateral lateral recess approach (FLLR‐TFESI).Patients receiving TFESI due to HIVD with radiculopathy between 2010 January and 2020 August were retrospectively enrolled. While the FLLR‐TFESI was taken as the experimental group, the conventional approach was viewed as the control group. The baseline characteristics, the pattern of contrast enhancement under fluoroscopic guidance, and the complications of these patients were collected and analyzed.A total of 380 patients were analyzed (143 in control group and 237 in experimental group). The two groups were balanced in most baseline characteristics, except disc extrusion (p = 0.01) and scoliosis (p = 0.04). The FLLR‐TFESI have a better contrast distribution (p < 0.01), even after adjustment (p < 0.001). No intrathecal injection was noted, but higher rate of intra‐disc injection was noted in FLLR‐TFESI group (10% vs. 3%, p = 0.008).The FLLR‐TFESI has a superior contrast enhancement and distribution in comparison to conventional approach. Prospective study to confirm the study result as well as the clinical benefits is suggested in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery have high rates of preoperative opioid use, which is associated with inferior outcomes and higher risks for opioid dependency postoperatively. Determine whether there are identifiable subgroups of patients that follow distinct patterns in pre- and postoperative opioid dosing. Examine how preoperative patterns in opioid dosing relate to postoperative opioid patterns, opioid cessation, and the risk for adverse events. Retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (MeritiveTM Marketscan® Research Databases 2007–2015). The 9,768 patients undergoing primary single level lumbar fusion. Primary: daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) opioid dosing calculated from prescriptions dispensed for 1 year before and after surgery; secondary: 90-day all-cause readmission and complications, 90-day acute postoperative pain, 90-day and 1-year reoperation, surgical costs, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Distinct patient subgroups defined by patterns of daily MME pre- and postoperatively were identified via group-based trajectory modeling. Associations between these groups and outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression with risk adjustment for patient and surgical factors. Among primary single level lumbar fusion patients, 59.5% filled an opioid prescription in the 3 months preceding surgery, whereas 40.5% were opioid naïve (Naïve). Five distinct subgroups of daily MME were identified among those filling opioids preoperatively: (1) Naïve to 3m (21.2% of patients): no opioids until 3 months preoperatively, escalating to 15 MME/day; (2) Low to 3m (11.4%): very low or as needed dose until 3 months preoperatively, escalating to 15 MME/day; (3) 6m Rise (6.9%): no opioids until 6 months preoperatively, escalating to >30 MME/day; (4) Medium (9.8%): increased linearly from 10 to 25 MME/day across the year before surgery; (5) High (10.0%): increased linearly from 60 to >80 MME/day across the year before surgery. These five preoperative opioid groups were related to postoperative opioids filled in a dose-response manner. The two preoperative patient groups with chronic Medium to High -dose opioid dosing were associated with increased adverse events, including all-cause readmission, reoperation, and pneumonia, whereas a low baseline group with a large, earlier preoperative rise in opioid dosing (6m Rise) had increased encounters for acute postoperative pain. Postoperatively, only 9.5% of patients did not fill an opioid prescription. Five distinct postoperative subgroups were identified based on their patterns in daily MME: Two groups ceased filling opioids within the year following surgery (33.6% of patients), and three groups declined in opioid dosage following surgery but plateaued at low (0–5 MME/day, 29.1%), medium (10–15 MME/day, 12.0%), or high (70–75 MME/day), 13.1%) doses by 1 year. Patients within the higher preoperative opioid groups were more likely to belong to the postoperative groups that were unable to cease filling opioids. Identification of a patient's preoperative time trend in daily opioid use may provide significant prognostic value and help guide pain management and risk reduction efforts. III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. The back area occupies the most important area that is responsible for the efficiency of movement and activity in humans, due to the backbone which is considered the basic oxis in the human body and the common factor in all its activities and nearly all the daily tasks. The research aims to identify the effect of a therapeutic program on the degree of pain and some physical changes in patients with a herniated lumbar disc. That will be through identifying the effects of the rehabilitation on the pain degree, and some physical changes of the working muscles. Methods. The researcher used the experimental syllabus as he used one group in the pre and post-test because it suits the nature of the research. The research sample is selected intentionally from those who have lumbar discs(a group of 80 injured). The researcher used the following equipment (A medical scale to measure weight - a Restameter device for measuring length - patient information release forms - Genometer to measure the range of motion - which measures the degree of pain). The patient's degree of pain is determined by determining the pain score from(0 to 10), then the patient is asked to look at his facial expression, and the score is given out of (10) using the numerical pain scale). Results. The main findings indicate that: (i)The use of a rehabilitation program that included rehabilitation exercises has a clear positive effect on the research variable (the movement range - level of pain the strength of working muscles); (ii)There are statistically significant differences in the improving rate between the pre and post measurements for the experimented group through the effect of the suggested program on the movement rate for the backbone. (Bend the torso forward - torso curvature-Bend the torso right - and left - turn torso right - turn torso left) for the herniated lumbar disc. That was in favor of the averages for the pre-measurements with a percentage ranging between (14.50%-21.11%); and (iii). Conclusions. There are statistical differences in the improving rate between the pre and post-measurement for the experimented group on the effect of the suggested rehabilitation program on the movement rate of the thigh (Bending the right hip joint - Extending the right hip - Bending the left hip joint - Extending the left hip joint) for the herniated lumbar disc which is in favor of the averages for the post measurements with the percentage ranging between(17.13%-19.94%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sagittal sequences of the spine have been shown to correlate with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but coronal sequences and KOA have never been studied before. The study required patients to use a standard standing posture and aimed to explore the relationship between coronal position of lumbar spine and WOMAC score in KOA. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study. Data on a total of 268 patients with KOA were collected. Patients were photographed in a standard standing position and lumbar–sacrum offset distance (L-SOD) and lumbar–knee offset distance (ΔL-KOD) were calculated. Patients were then divided into different groups according to different critical values and differences were compared. Results: In the L-SOD of L1–3, WOMAC function (P = 0.021, P = 0.032, P = 0.001) and total score (P = 0.039, P = 0.034, P < 0.001) were different. In the L-SOD of L3–4, WOMAC pain score were different (P = 0.001, P = 0.032). At a cutoff of 13 mm, ΔL-KOD of L1–2 showed significant differences in pain part (P = 0.025, P = 0.039) and total score (P = 0.036, P = 0.050). There were significant differences in pain (P = 0.023, P = 0.027, P = 0.022), function (P = 0.048, P = 0.038, P = 0.047), and total score (P = 0.030, P = 0.027, P = 0.029) of L3–5. In the 18-mm cutoff group, only L1 and L2 have differences in the pain part (P = 0.050, P = 0.038). Conclusion: Coronal balance of the lumbar spine is associated with knee pain and function. The pelvis plays an important role in maintaining the coronal balance. Both the lumbar spine and the knee joint should be considered when developing the surgical strategy. Plain Language Summary: As a result of population aging, the number of patients suffering from both knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine is increasing. It has been reported that patients with KOA have less symptomatic recovery after lumbar surgery, and that patients with lumbar degenerative disease have less symptomatic improvement after knee surgery than those without lumbar disease. So the knee and lumbar must be interacting in some way. Previous studies have confirmed the correlation between lumbar sagittal position sequence and KOA. However, no studies have been conducted on coronal sequences and KOA of the lumbar spine. We believe that it is because patients are required to stand naturally when taking coronal x-rays, and natural standing will lead to individual differences in the distance between the feet of patients, thereby preventing analysis. In our study, for the first time, we used a uniform stance to avoid this effect. The advantage of uniform stance is that individual differences can be excluded, and the same patient can be compared before and after treatment (because the natural stance of the patient's feet will be different before and after treatment), which is greatly conducive to the study. Our research found that the offset of the lumbar spine in the coronal position and the distance between the central vertical line of the lumbar spine and the bilateral knee joint are significantly correlated with knee pain and function. This may have some guiding significance for lumbar and knee surgery. For lumbar surgery (such as degenerative scoliosis), previous studies have suggested that short segment fixation is sufficient for patients with small Cobb angle. However, according to our conclusion, this may cause accelerated knee joint degeneration in the patient's later stages, which requires the surgeon to comprehensively evaluate the condition of the patient's knee and lumbar spine, and then formulate surgical strategies. The same is true for knee surgery: previous studies have shown no significant correlation between knee deformity and pain. Therefore, for patients with knee deformity and accompanying pain, knee surgery may not be the best choice, and it is more important to correct the deviation of the spine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The term "Juxtafacet cyst" refers to both synovial cysts and ganglion pseudocysts associated with the lumbar facet joint. As conservative treatment for the juxtafacet cyst has a minimal effect, complete excision through surgery is considered the first choice of treatment. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty for symptomatic lumbar juxtafacet cysts. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 34 patients with symptomatic juxtafacet cysts who visited a single institute from January 2010 to September 2023. Patients who received conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks but experienced no or insufficient effects were eligible for this study. After neuroplasty, a medical history check and neurological examination were performed during follow-up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and once a year thereafter. Results: The pain improved for all patients to a VAS score of 3 or less immediately after neuroplasty; however, four of those patients (11%) had pain that worsened eventually to the same level as before the procedure and required surgery. The results showed that, regardless of cyst size, in cases with severe stenosis of the spinal canal, the outcome of neuroplasty was poor and often eventually required surgery. The cyst size was not associated with the procedure results. In addition, if the cyst was present at the L4–L5 level, or if diabetes mellitus was present, the likelihood of future surgery was significant (p-value = 0.003). Conclusions: Percutaneous neuroplasty showed a better success rate than other non-surgical treatments. In addition, severe spinal stenosis (Schizas grade C or higher), L4–L5 level, or diabetes mellitus produced a high possibility of surgery due to recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present three new and six published infants with overlapping features of LUMBAR syndrome (lower body hemangioma, urogenital anomalies, spinal cord malformations, bony deformities, anorectal/arterial anomalies and renal anomalies) and OEIS complex (omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, and spinal defects), also known as cloacal exstrophy. OEIS is included under the recently proposed umbrella coined recurrent constellations of embryonic malformations (RCEMs). The RCEMs represent a phenotypically overlapping spectrum of rare disorders of caudal dysgenesis with unknown cause but likely shared pathogenesis. It has recently been proposed that LUMBAR be considered an RCEM. This report of infants with combined features of OEIS and LUMBAR is the first to demonstrate an overlap between LUMBAR and another RCEM, which supports LUMBAR's inclusion within the RCEM spectrum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Depression and anxiety are common in patients undergoing spinal surgery and might negatively impact outcomes. This study investigates the possible effect of these diagnoses on patient reported outcomes following lumbar fusion. Retrospective review of a registry containing prospectively collected data of lumbar fusion procedures at a single institution was performed from May 23, 2012 to June 15, 2022. Patients with a minimum of two year follow-up were included. Demographic information, diagnoses, medications, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), and complications data at preoperative, three months, six months, 1 year, and two years postoperative were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t -tests, χ2, binomial correlation, odds ratios, logistic regression, and mean clinically important difference. A total of 156 patients were included (60 males, 96 females) with mean age 62.6 ± 11.1 years at surgery. Thirty-nine (25%) had depression and/or anxiety (DA). Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol Group 5D questionnaire (EQ5D) scores were significantly worse in the DA cohort compared to controls (ODI 51.1 ± 18.3 vs. 42.9 ± 15.8; P = 0.010, EQ5D 0.46 ± 0.21 vs. 0.57 ± 0.21; P = 0.005). Both cohorts experienced similar relative improvement at two years (delta ODI −18.2 ± 27.9 vs. −17.8 ± 22.1; P = 0.924, EQ5D 6.8 ± 33.8 vs. 8.1 ± 32.9; P = 0.830). Absolute outcome scores were worse in the DA cohort at all intervals. DA were not independently predictive of changes in PROMs (delta ODI mean difference 4.49, r2 = 0.36, P = 0.924). The present study showed similar improvement in PROMs following lumbar fusion for patients with anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. These data suggest these patients are no less likely to benefit from appropriately planned lumbar fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Calcified lumbar disc herniations (CLDH) causing calcified ventral stenosis pose a therapeutic challenge to the treating surgeon due to their neural adhesions, location, and hardness. This retrospective study analyzed all the cases of CLDH/calcified ventral stenosis managed by transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The preoperative images were analyzed for the level, migration; and grade (Lee's migration zones), and location (Michigan State University classification). Detailed surgical technique and intraoperative parameters including the duration of surgery and complications have been recorded. The clinical parameters including visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), length of stay in hospital, days of return to basic work, and patient satisfaction index were analyzed. Postoperatively the images were analyzed for the adequacy of decompression. The mean VAS for back pain and leg pain was 4.7 ± 2.6 (0–9), and 7.45 ± 2.2 (1–10), respectively. The mean preoperative ODI was 78.2 ± 13.2 (63.2–95.6). Nineteen patients (24%) had neurological deficits preoperatively. The mean duration of surgery was 90.5 ± 15.8 (58–131) minutes. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed adequate decompression in 97.5% (n = 77). The mean duration of hospital stay was 1.05 ± 0.22 (1–2) days, and the postoperative back and leg pain VAS was 1.14 ± 1.2 (0–3) (P < 0.05) and 1.7 ± 0.5 (0–6) (P < 0.05), respectively. The ODI at final follow-up was 6.5 ± 3.7 (2.2–18) (P < 0.05). Neurological recovery occurred in 17 (89.5%) patients and they returned to basic work/jobs in 19.5 ± 3.3 (14–26) days. The mean patient satisfaction index was 1.18 ± 0.47 (1–2) at a mean follow-up of 5.52 ± 2.91 (2–12.75) years. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a complete, safe, and efficacious procedure in patients with CLDH with earlier recovery considering the surgery is performed with the patient being awake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion was a new technique that leads to improved visualization, improved safety and less trauma than does the traditional procedure. The purpose of this study was to introduce the technique of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) and determine its efficacy. 35 patients with an average age of 52.3±13.7 years were treated with single-segment PE-PLIF. The perioperative parameters and the radiographic parameters were measured. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain, VAS score for leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score were used to assess the levels of pain and function. The mean estimated volume of blood loss was 68.6±32.3 ml, operative time was 179.6±31.0 minutes. PE-PLIF significantly reduced the VAS score for low back pain, VAS score for leg pain and ODI score, and improved the posterior disc height, lumbar lordosis angle and segmental lordosis angle (p < 0.05). The rate of satisfaction was 94.3%. One patient suffered a dural tear. There was one case of contralateral radiculopathy that was relieved after conservative treatment. This research suggests that PE-PLIF is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment for degenerative lumbar diseases requiring interbody fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Expandable transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) devices have been developed to introduce more segmental lordosis through a narrow operative corridor, but there are concerns about the degree of achievable correction with a small graft footprint. In this report, we describe the technical nuances associated with placing bilateral expandable cages for correction of iatrogenic deformity. Materials and Methods A 60-year-old female with symptomatic global sagittal malalignment and a severe lumbar kyphotic deformity after five prior lumbar surgeries presented to our institution. We performed multilevel posterior column osteotomies, a L3–4 intradiscal osteotomy, and placed bilateral lordotic expandable TLIF cages at the level of maximum segmental kyphosis. Results We achieve a 21-degree correction of the patient's focal kyphotic deformity and restoration of the patient global sagittal alignment. Conclusion This case demonstrates both the feasibility and utility of placing bilateral expandable TLIF cages at a single disc space in the setting of severe focal sagittal malalignment. This technique expands the implant footprint and, when coupled with an intradiscal osteotomy, allows for a significant restoration of segmental lordosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to establish international consensus regarding the use of spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents among expert international physiotherapists. Twenty-six international expert physiotherapists in manual therapy and paediatrics voluntarily participated in a 3-Round Delphi survey to reach a consensus via direct electronic mail solicitation using Qualtrics®. Consensus was defined a-priori as ≥75% agreement on all items with the same ranking of agreement or disagreement. Round 1 identified impairments and conditions where spinal mobilisation and manipulation might be utilised. In Rounds 2 and 3, panelists agreed or disagreed using a 4-point Likert scale. Eleven physiotherapists from seven countries representing five continents completed all three Delphi rounds. Consensus regarding spinal mobilisation or manipulation included: Manipulation is not recommended: (1) for infants across all conditions, impairments, and spinal levels; and (2) for children and adolescents across most conditions and spinal levels. Manipulation may be recommended for adolescents to treat spinal region-specific joint hypomobility (thoracic, lumbar), and pain (thoracic). Mobilisation may be recommended for children and adolescents with hypomobility, joint pain, muscle/myofascial pain, or stiffness at all spinal levels. Consensus revealed spinal manipulation should not be performed on infants regardless of condition, impairment, or spinal level. Additionally, the panel agreed that manipulation may be recommended only for adolescents to treat joint pain and joint hypomobility (limited to thoracic and/or lumbar levels). Spinal mobilisation may be recommended for joint hypomobility, joint pain, muscle/myofascial pain, and muscle/myofascial stiffness at all spinal levels among children and adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify factors and barriers, which affect the utilisation of spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents. Twenty-six international expert physiotherapists in manual therapy and paediatrics were invited to participate in a Delphi investigation using QualtricsⓇ. In Round-1 physiotherapists selected from a list of factors and barriers affecting their decision to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the paediatric population and had opportunity to add to the list. Round-2 asked respondents to select as many factors and barriers that they agreed with, resulting in a frequency count. The subset of responses to questions around barriers and facilitators are the focus of this study. Twelve physiotherapists completed both rounds of the survey. Medical diagnosis, mechanism of injury, patient presentation, tolerance to handling, and therapist's knowledge of techniques were the dominant deciding factors to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents across spinal levels. More than 90% of the respondents selected manipulation as inappropriate among infants as their top barrier. Additional dominant barriers to using spinal manipulation among infants and children identified by ≥ 75% of the respondents included fear of injuring the patient, fear of litigation, lack of communication, lack of evidence, lack of guardian consent, and precision of the examination to inform clinical reasoning. This international survey provides much needed insight regarding the factors and barriers physiotherapists should consider when contemplating the utilisation of spinal mobilisation and manipulation in the paediatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, finite element (FE) models of an anatomical normal and a degenerated disc of L4–L5 motion segment, developed using different methodologies of volume mesh constructions, and ways of defining the spinal components' material properties, were exercised and analyzed. The geometrics details were obtained using digitizing technique and segmentation of computed tomography (CT) scans; with material and structural properties of the spinal components defined based on the literature and greyscale values of CT images for the normal and degenerated L4–L5 motion segments, respectively. The predicted kinematic responses under five different physiological loadings in three anatomical reference planes for both models together with published data were analyzed. The predicted results correlated well within the range and in similar trends with published experimental results. The overall predicted responses showed different volume mesh constructions and the representation of spinal components' material properties were accurate enough to predict the kinematic responses, although experimental results exhibit considerable divergence due to different experimental techniques. Both models exhibited different rotational and translation segmental stiffness in each corresponding loading configuration. The normal L4–L5 segment exhibited greatest axial torsional stiffness, and least extensional stiffness. The degenerated L4–L5 segment was least flexible (greatest stiffness) in extension and most flexible (least stiffness) in flexion. For compression, the axial stiffness of segment of normal segment was about 10% larger than that of the degenerated segment. The en-bloc efforts of all spinal components have contributed to the different nonlinear kinematic characteristics and segmental stiffness of these different L4–L5 motion segments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To test the feasibility of US/CT fusion imaging to guide lumbar intradiscal O2/O3 therapy to treat discogenic degenerative low back pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods: We retrospectively included consecutive patients affected by low back pain and/or sciatica due to LDH resistant to conservative therapies, who underwent to lumbar intradiscal O2/O3 injection under CT/US fusion imaging guidance (Fusion Group) and standard CT guidance (Control Group). For each procedure, we collected procedure operative time, room utilization time, number of CT passes, complications, and O2/O3 intradiscal diffusion adequacy. Technical success was defined as the ability to complete the procedure as initially planned to reach the disc. Technical efficacy was based on O2/O3 intradiscal diffusion adequacy, as demonstrated by the last CT scan. Results: Six patients (4 males; mean age: 68 ± 15 years) were included in the Fusion group, six (4 males; mean age: 66 ± 12 years) in Control group. No complications were observed in both groups. In Fusion group we found significantly lower room utilization time (30 ± 6 min vs. 46 ± 10 min, p = 0.008), procedure operative time (14 ± 3 min vs. 24 ± 6 min, p = 0.008), and number of CT passes (2 [2,2] vs. 3 [3,3], p = 0.006) than in Control Group, respectively. Technical success and efficacy were 100% in both Groups. Conclusion: CT/US fusion imaging seems to be a feasible and safe guidance for intradiscal O2/O3 injections, allowing decrease of procedure time and number of CT passes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundSocial determinants of health (SDOH), have been demonstrated to significantly impact health outcomes in spine patients. There may be interaction between opioid use and these factors in spine surgical patients. We aimed to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOH) which are associated with perioperative opioid use among lumbar spine patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar degeneration in 2019. Opioid use was determined based on prescription records from the electronic medical records. Preoperative opioid users (OU) were compared with opioid-naïve patients regarding SDOH including demographics like age and race, and clinical data such as activity and tobacco use. Demographics and surgical data, including age, comorbidities, surgical invasiveness, and other variables were also collected from the records. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis of these factors.ResultsNinety-eight patients were opioid-naïve and 90 used opioids preoperatively. All OU had ≥3 months of use, had more prior spine surgeries (1.07 vs. 0.44, p

IntroductionThis study investigated the variability in lumbar neuromuscular adaptations to pain, the task dependency of pain adaptations and the effect of these adaptations on motor performance.MethodsTwenty-four healthy participants performed isometric back extension contractions at 45° and 90° trunk flexion under pain-free and experimental low back pain conditions induced by electrical stimulation. High-density surface electromyography recorded lumbar muscle activation strategies, and force steadiness was measured using a load cell.ResultsWhile considerable variability in neuromuscular adaptations to lumbar pain was observed among participants, consistent patterns were found between tasks. In the 90° trunk flexion position, both sides exhibited greater magnitudes of pain adaptations for muscle activity redistribution in the mediolateral axis (p

ObjectiveProximal junctional failure (PJF) is a severe form of proximal junctional kyphosis. Previous reports on PJF have been limited by heterogeneous cohorts and relatively short follow-ups. The authors' objectives herein were to identify risk factors for PJF and to assess its long-term incidence and revision rates in a homogeneous cohort.MethodsThe authors reviewed data from the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis 1 trial (ASLS-1), a National Institutes of Health-sponsored prospective multicenter study. Inclusion criteria were an age ≥ 40 years, ASLS (Cobb angle ≥ 30° and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] ≥ 20 or Scoliosis Research Society revised 22-item questionnaire [SRS-22r] score ≤ 4.0 in pain, function, or self-image domains), and primary thoracolumbar fusion/fixation to the sacrum/pelvis of ≥ 7 levels. PJF was defined as a postoperative proximal junctional angle (PJA) change > 20°, fracture of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1 with > 20% vertebral height loss, spondylolisthesis of UIV/UIV+1 > 3 mm, or UIV screw dislodgment.ResultsOne hundred sixty patients (141 women) were included in this analysis and had a median age of 62 years and a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (range 0.1-6.1 years). Forty-six patients (28.8%) had PJF at a median of 0.92 years (IQR 0.14, 1.23 years) following surgery. Based on Kaplan-Meier analyses, PJF rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 14.4%, 21.9%, 25.9%, and 27.4%, respectively. On univariate analysis, PJF was associated with greater age (p = 0.0316), greater body mass index (BMI; p = 0.0319), worse baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; ODI, SRS-22r, and SF-12 Physical Component Summary [PCS]; all p < 0.04), the use of posterior column osteotomies (PCOs; p = 0.0039), and greater postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK; p = 0.0031) and PJA (p < 0.001). The use of UIV hooks was protective against PJF (p = 0.0340). On regression analysis (without postoperative measures), PJF was associated with greater BMI (HR 1.077, 95% CI 1.007-1.153, p = 0.0317), lower preoperative PJA (HR 0.607, 95% CI 0.407-0.906, p = 0.0146), and greater preoperative TK (HR 1.362, 95% CI 1.082-1.715, p = 0.0085). Patients with PJF had worse PROMs at the last follow-up (ODI, SRS-22r subscore and self-image, and SF-12 PCS; p < 0.04). Sixteen PJF patients (34.8%) underwent revision, and PJF recurred in 3 (18.8%).ConclusionsAmong 160 primary ASLS patients with a median age of 62 years and predominant coronal deformity, the PJF rate was 28.8% at a mean 4.3-year follow-up, with a revision rate of 34.8%. On univariate analysis, PJF was associated with a greater age and BMI, worse baseline PROMs, the use of PCOs, and greater postoperative TK and PJA. The use of UIV hooks was protective against PJF. On multivariate analysis (without postoperative measures), a higher risk of PJF was associated with greater BMI and preoperative TK and lower preoperative PJA.