Search

Background Transforming care so that people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people can receive support at home rather than in hospital settings is a key priority, but progress has been slow. Despite significant national debate, little previous research has engaged directly with people in hospital, their families or front-line staff to understand the issues from their perspectives. Objectives This research seeks to better understand the experiences of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, their families and front-line staff – using this knowledge to create practice guides and training materials to support new understandings and ways of working. Design Following a structured review of the literature, we sought to work with up to 10 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in three case-study sites (2021–22), supplementing this with interviews with family members and commissioners; interviews/focus groups with hospital staff, social workers, advocates and care providers; information from case files; and observations of multidisciplinary meetings. Setting Three ‘long-stay’ hospital settings in England. Participants Twenty-seven people in hospital, together with families, health and social care staff and commissioners. Results People in hospital report widespread frustration, feel that hospital environments are not conducive to getting/staying well, and face multiple barriers to leaving hospital. Without someone to fight for them, people struggle to overcome the inertia built into our current systems and processes. Front-line staff are equally frustrated and describe a complex and seemingly dysfunctional system which they find almost impossible to navigate. Hospital staff from different professional backgrounds do not have a shared sense of how many people really need to be in hospital or how many people could be cared for in different settings – suggesting that different definitions, world views and professional judgements might be at play. Hospital staff are frustrated about what they see as the difficulty of discharging people into community services, while community services are equally frustrated about what they see as a risk-averse approach which they feel can lack an up-to-date knowledge of what is possible to achieve in the community. Despite over a decade of policy attempts to resolve these issues, very significant barriers remain. Limitations This research explored the experiences of a small number of people, but has done so in significant depth. The research was undertaken in secure settings, during COVID and in a difficult external policy and practice context, and so has had to be very flexible and empathetic in order to build relationships and make the research possible. Future research could helpfully consider the needs of people from black and minority ethnic communities, the extent to which the experiences of people on forensic pathways are similar to/different from other people’s experiences (including perspectives from the criminal justice system), and what happens to people in the long term after they leave hospital. Conclusions Working to make the voices of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people (as well as the staff who support them) centre stage is complex and sensitive. However, this lived experience/practice knowledge is a crucial resource if we are going to develop better policy and practice solutions in the longer term. Study registration This study is registered at www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130298) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Plain language summary Around 2000 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people are living in hospital. This can be for many years. This is a real problem because hospitals: are not designed to help people to lead ordinary lives; are expensive; can be far away from people’s homes and families; have had a number of abuse scandals. Despite this, there is little research on why people remain stuck in such settings. In particular, previous research often fails to talk directly to people with learning disabilities, their families and staff. Unless we listen to these voices we will not find solutions to these problems. Too many people will therefore remain in hospital unnecessarily. This is sensitive work. It requires skills in working: with people who may not communicate verbally; with people who might be very angry, scared and distressed; where there can be tensions around what is best. We therefore included an experienced team who could carry out such in-depth work in a way that suits the needs of the individual. We also worked with a group of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people and their families to help us do our work well. We found that: lots of people are still stuck in hospital; they are very frustrated and distressed; hospital is a difficult place to be while you are waiting to leave. Once you are in it is very difficult to get out; health and social care staff are also very frustrated. They find it almost impossible to help people leave hospital; hospital staff and community services find it difficult to work with each other; government has promised to solve this for more than 10 years. However, there are still lots of problems. Scientific summary Background Transforming care so that people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people can receive support at home rather than in inpatient units, secure settings or assessment and treatment units (ATUs) is a key policy priority, which has significant implications for people’s quality of life as well as for public finances. Over time we have witnessed a series of abuse scandals and significant public anger at such outmoded service models, often provided out-of-area and in the commercial sector at significant expense and with poor outcomes. A key aim of the national ‘Building the Right Support’ and ‘Transforming Care’ programmes has been to enhance community capacity and reduce inappropriate hospital admissions/length of stay. In spite of this some 2185 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people were hospital inpatients at the end of January 2020 (58% of whom had a hospital stay of over 2 years) and progress on discharge has been slow. Despite significant national debate, very little previous research has engaged directly with people with learning disabilities/autistic people or their families to understand the issues from their perspective. Whilst professionals often see the individual at a particular point in time (often in a crisis), it is only the person and their family who have a longitudinal sense of how their story has unfolded: their informal networks; their contacts over time with formal services; their experience of hospital; the different options considered; and what has ultimately helped/hindered in securing desired outcomes. Failing to take into account this lived experience is not only morally wrong, but also deprives us of a major source of expertise with which to improve services. Similarly, there has been little consideration of the perspectives of front-line staff, who are being asked to practise in very different ways in a difficult environment, arguably without the support needed to do this well. Objectives Against this background, the University of Birmingham and the rights-based organisation Changing Our Lives carried out this joint project in order to better understand the experiences of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, their families and front-line staff – using this knowledge to create practice guides and training materials to support new understandings and new ways of working. Our aims are to: review the literature on the rate/causes of delayed hospital discharges of adults with learning disabilities and/or autistic people from specialist inpatient units, National Health Service (NHS) campuses and ATUs (referred to as ‘long-stay hospital settings’ as a shorthand); more fully understand the reasons why some people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people are unable to leave hospital, drawing on multiple perspectives (including the lived experience of people with learning disabilities/autistic people and their families, and the tacit knowledge of front-line staff); identify lessons for policy/practice so that more people can leave hospital and lead a more ordinary life in the community. Methods Initially, we conducted a formal review of the research and grey literature, identifying rates of delayed discharge for people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, the methods used to identify such rates and the solutions proposed. Studies were included if they reported original empirical data on rates of delayed discharge and were published from 1990 onwards (the year of the passage of the NHS and Community Care Act). Next, we worked with three hospital sites from across the country in order to conduct: in-depth work with up to 10 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people per site, and with a family member, to understand their journey through services over time, their experience of long-stay hospital provision, the kinds of lives they would like to be living, and the barriers that are preventing them from leaving hospital (i.e. interviews with up to 30 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people, and family members who also agreed to participate); in the end, 27 people took part; interviews/focus groups with hospital staff in each site, commissioners, social workers, advocates and social care providers who support people after they leave hospital. Sites included two NHS Trusts and one independent-sector provider, with a mix of service models (forensic services, ATUs, different levels of security etc.) and a range of people (male/female wards, people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people, people with experience of the criminal justice system, and people with experience of long-term seclusion and segregation). When defining ‘long-stay settings’, our study followed NHS Digital technical guidance. Results There is a well-known saying that ‘every system is perfectly designed to get the results it gets’ – and the experience of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospitals seems a classic example of this maxim. Despite exploring the issues at stake from a range of different perspectives (including people in hospital, families, hospital staff, commissioners and various different social care workers), this research has identified a series of very consistent themes and experiences. In particular: There is limited prior research (in terms of both the number of previous studies and a series of methodological issues) and a widespread tendency to neglect insights based on lived experience and practice knowledge. People in hospital report widespread frustration, feel that hospital environments are not conducive to getting and staying well, and face all kinds of barriers to leaving hospital – with an overriding sense of people’s lives being on hold while health and social care systems try to find ways to support people in the community. Without someone (or various people) to really fight for them, people struggle to overcome the inertia built into our current systems and processes, and continue to experience very long hospital stays and very significant delays. Front-line staff are equally frustrated and describe a complex and seemingly dysfunctional system which they find almost impossible to navigate. When people do come out, it seems to happen almost in spite of the current system rather than because of it. Hospital staff from different professional backgrounds do not have a shared sense of how many people really need to be in hospital or how many people could be cared for in different settings – suggesting that different definitions, world views and professional judgements might be at play. Hospital staff are frustrated about what they see as the difficulty of discharging people into community services, while community services are equally frustrated about what they see as a risk-averse approach which they feel can lack an up-to-date knowledge of what is possible to achieve in the community. Despite over a decade of policy attempts to resolve these issues, very significant barriers remain. Conclusions This was a difficult and often distressing study to conduct – although nowhere near as difficult and distressing as for people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people living in long-stay settings, or for health and social care staff trying to support people to leave hospital and lead more ordinary lives in the community. Throughout we have been struck by an overwhelming sense that this is a situation that no one planned, that no one really wants and that no one really knows how to resolve. Despite this, we remain convinced that we will struggle to make further and long-lasting progress unless we draw more fully on lived experience and practice knowledge, recognise these as valid and important ways of knowing the world, and work with the people who are most affected and – by definition – are most expert in the issues at stake to develop better, more inclusive solutions in future. Study registration This study is registered at www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130298) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Background: Transforming care so that people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people can receive support at home rather than in hospital settings is a key priority, but progress has been slow. Despite significant national debate, little previous research has engaged directly with people in hospital, their families or front-line staff to understand the issues from their perspectives., Objectives: This research seeks to better understand the experiences of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in long-stay hospital settings, their families and front-line staff - using this knowledge to create practice guides and training materials to support new understandings and ways of working., Design: Following a structured review of the literature, we sought to work with up to 10 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people in three case-study sites (2021-22), supplementing this with interviews with family members and commissioners; interviews/focus groups with hospital staff, social workers, advocates and care providers; information from case files; and observations of multidisciplinary meetings., Setting: Three 'long-stay' hospital settings in England., Participants: Twenty-seven people in hospital, together with families, health and social care staff and commissioners., Results: • People in hospital report widespread frustration, feel that hospital environments are not conducive to getting/staying well, and face multiple barriers to leaving hospital. Without someone to fight for them, people struggle to overcome the inertia built into our current systems and processes. • Front-line staff are equally frustrated and describe a complex and seemingly dysfunctional system which they find almost impossible to navigate. • Hospital staff from different professional backgrounds do not have a shared sense of how many people really need to be in hospital or how many people could be cared for in different settings - suggesting that different definitions, world views and professional judgements might be at play. • Hospital staff are frustrated about what they see as the difficulty of discharging people into community services, while community services are equally frustrated about what they see as a risk-averse approach which they feel can lack an up-to-date knowledge of what is possible to achieve in the community. • Despite over a decade of policy attempts to resolve these issues, very significant barriers remain., Limitations: This research explored the experiences of a small number of people, but has done so in significant depth. The research was undertaken in secure settings, during COVID and in a difficult external policy and practice context, and so has had to be very flexible and empathetic in order to build relationships and make the research possible. Future research could helpfully consider the needs of people from black and minority ethnic communities, the extent to which the experiences of people on forensic pathways are similar to/different from other people's experiences (including perspectives from the criminal justice system), and what happens to people in the long term after they leave hospital., Conclusions: Working to make the voices of people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people (as well as the staff who support them) centre stage is complex and sensitive. However, this lived experience/practice knowledge is a crucial resource if we are going to develop better policy and practice solutions in the longer term., Study Registration: This study is registered at www.researchregistry.com (researchregistry6124)., Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130298) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research ; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Aim To make the stories about former long-stay institutions available to a wider audience, preserve the history and improve societal attitudes to people with learning disabilities. Method Three groups of people with links to the institution were interviewed using a semi-structured approach (n=40). Participants were asked why they felt it was important to tell their story. Findings Responses were organised under three themes: being heard, preservation and education. A range of motivations exists for why people choose or conversely choose not to participate in oral history projects. Conclusion Having knowledge and understanding of these factors can help potential researchers to recruit and retain those whose stories are a vital link between the past and the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The law known as the Long-Term Care Act or Dependant Care Act expressly recognizes some of the agents that make up the Social Economy, underlines its importance and introduces preferential treatment for this group in core aspects of the system. This article is an attempt to reflect the importance of the Third Sector in long-term care by reference to long-stay non-profit private hospitals. It describes the third sector group and compares it with other agents using three basic parameters: cost, revenue and staff. This analysis highlights the need for the long-term care information system to incorporate data that identify the activities performed by each of the actors who make up the Social Economy. The aim is to give it visibility and identify their strengths / weaknesses in a sector with a future such as long-term care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible summary • Mabel Cooper and Gloria Ferris spent their early adult life in St. Lawrence’s Hospital in Caterham. This was in the late 1950s to early 1970s. • This is their memories of how they spent their time. It includes the work they did and leisure. • They also write about the tokens that were used in the hospital instead of money. Memories of life for patients at St. Lawrences hospital from late 1950s to 1970s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]