Search

Este artículo analiza la influencia árabe en el Sefer ha-Mešālim (El libro de las fábulas) de Jacob Ben Eleazar a través de la investigación en los grandes inventarios de la literatura árabe medieval en el Medio Oriente, en el Norte de África y en la Península Ibérica. Jacob Ben Eleazar vivió en la España cristiana durante el siglo XIII. Escribió, en hebreo, Sefer ha-Mešālim, diez capítulos en prosa rimada, adoptando las mismas reglas de la maqāma árabe. En este artículo, me centraré en el tercer y cuarto capítulos del libro, y trataré de responder a la pregunta: ¿hay alguna influencia árabe en los capítulos seleccionados? El capítulo tercero se trata de un debate poético entre un grupo de poetas que discuten las similitudes en poesía, mientras que el cuarto incluye un debate literario entre la espada y la pluma. La razón de elegir estos dos capítulos se debe a la obvia similitud entre los debates literarios en ellos y los que se encuentran en la literatura árabe., This article analyses the Arab influence on Jacob Ben Eleazar’s Sefer hameshālīm (The Book of Stories) based on research in the large inventories of medieval Arabic literature existing in the Middle East, North Africa and Iberia. Jacob Ben Elʿazar lived in thirteenth century Christian Spain. He wrote Sefer ha-meshālīm, a book divided into ten chapters and written in rhymed prose, applying the rules of the Arabic maqāma. This article focuses on the third and fourth chapters of the book and attempts to answer the following question: Is there any Arab influence on the selected chapters? Chapter 3 features a debate held by a group of poets discussing similarities in poetry, while Chapter 4 includes a literary debate between the sword and the pen. The reason for choosing these two chapters is their obvious similarity with literary debates found in Arabic literature.

Данная статья посвящена одной из самых известных дискуссий в литературных кругах Японии начала ХХ века, не изученной, однако, в отечественном японоведении, – спору Акутагава Рюноскэ и Танидзаки Дзюнъитиро о сущности прозы, который получил название «спор о бессюжетном романе». В 1927 г., когда дискуссия развернулась на страницах журнала «Кайдзо», литературная жизнь была сосредоточена в кругах творческой элиты бундан, в рамках которой создавались различные объединения и журналы. В ходе дискуссии Акутагава предложил понятие «поэтического духа» в прозаическом произведении как центральную категорию своей эстетической теории, подразумевая под этим главенствующую роль лирического настроения героя над сюжетной линией. Произведение, содержащее в себе «поэтический дух», Акутагава считал вершиной прозаического творчества и именно такую прозу называл «рассказ без рассказа», полагая, что «интересный сюжет» и интерес к сюжету как таковому умаляет достоинство произведения, приближая его к общедоступной, развлекательной литературе. Танидзаки, произведения которого Акутагава и критиковал за «интересный сюжет», выступал в защиту множества сюжетных линий, утверждая, что таким образом создается «архитектурная красота» произведения, что подразумевает, во-первых, его структурную сложность, во-вторых, обеспечивает внутреннюю энергетику. В противоположность Акутагава, Танидзаки не считал общедоступность литературы качеством, перечеркивающим еѐ художественную ценность. В сущности данная дискуссия, в ходе которой признанные классики литературы Нового времени излагают основы своих эстетических взглядов, представляет собой спор о роли чистой литературы (дзюнбунгаку) и массовой (тайсю: бунгаку) – проблема, которая получит наибольшее развитие уже после смерти Акутагава. В этом заключается главное значение этого спора, который более правильно называть дискуссией, поскольку принципиального расхождения между писателями не наблюдалось. Дискуссия была обусловлена различиями в мироощущении, складе характера, эстетическом восприятии, нервной организации писателей, а также полярностью их жизненных этапов на тот момент. Для Акутагава, склонного к меланхолии, рациональному анализу и интеллектуально воспринимавшего мир, близился конец его жизни и конец эпохи «чистой» литературы, а Танидзаки, обладателю чувственно-мистического мировосприятия, уверенно пожинавшему плоды славы, ещѐ многое предстояло сделать на литературном поприще., This article is devoted to one of the most well-known discussions in the literary circles of Japan at the beginning of the twentieth century, the dispute between Akutagawa Ryunoske and Tanizaki Jun’ichiro about the essence of prose, which was called the “plotless novel” debate. In 1927, when the discussion was published in the magazine “Kaizo”, literary life was concentrated in the circles of the creative elite, or bundan, within which various associations and magazines were created. During the discussion, Akutagawa proposed the concept of “poetic spirit” in a prose work as the central category of his aesthetic theory, implying the dominant role of the hero’s lyrical mood over the storyline. Akutagawa considered the work containing the “poetic spirit” to be the pinnacle of prose creativity and called such prose “a story without a story”, believing that the “interesting story” and interest in the story as such diminish the quality of the work, bringing it closer to the mass entertaining literature. Tanizaki, whose works Akutagawa criticized for “an interesting plot,” defended the story with many plot lines, arguing that this creates the “architectural beauty” of the work, which implies, firstly, its structural complexity, and, secondly, provides internal energy. In contrast to Akutagawa, Tanizaki did not consider the general accessibility of literature as a quality that crossed out its artistic value. In essence, this discussion, in which the recognized classics of modern literature present the basis of their aesthetic views, is a dispute about the role of pure literature (junbungaku) and mass (taishū bungaku) – a problem that will be most developed after Akutagawa’s death. This is the main significance of this dispute, which should rather be called a discussion, since there was no fundamental difference between the writers. The discussion took place due to differences in attitude, character, aesthetic perception, psychological organization of the writers, as well as the polarity of their life moments at that time. For Akutagawa, prone to melancholy, rational analysis, and intellectual perception of the world, the end of his life and the end of the era of "pure" literature was nearing, while Tanizaki, demonstrating a sensual-mystical worldview and confidently gathering the fruits of glory, still had much to do in his literary career.

Submitted by Boris Flegr (boris@uerj.br) on 2021-01-05T14:53:21Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Wanessa Regina Paiva da Silva_Tese.pdf: 1468103 bytes, checksum: 670d77774116d4935c12795c4a587e1f (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2021-01-05T14:53:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Wanessa Regina Paiva da Silva_Tese.pdf: 1468103 bytes, checksum: 670d77774116d4935c12795c4a587e1f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-09-05 This thesis aims to investigate the functioning of brazilian literary life between 1930-1945, through a series of cultural investigations published by cariocas journals and magazines. After the analysis of our corpus, we observed how brazilian writers employed diferent strategies to confirm themselves within the literary scene. These movements were characterized mainly by the competition among them for the monopoly of literary legitimacy, that is to say, for the authority to say what is the true literature, who is intellectual and how he could play a social role. In this sense, the competition for this authority makes explicit the tensions inside the intellectual activity, concerning the evaluation of the relevance of its acting and the heterogeneity of representations about literary practice, formed in the relation between esthetics and politics. Esta tese se propõe a investigar o modo de funcionamento da vida literária que se estabeleceu entre os anos de 1930 a 1945, a partir de uma série de inquéritos culturais publicados por periódicos cariocas. Após a análise desse corpus, pudemos perceber como os escritores brasileiros se valiam de diferentes estratégias para se afirmar literariamente naquele cenário. Essa movimentação partia, sobretudo, de uma dinâmica de concorrência que tinha em vista o monopólio da legitimidade literária, isto é, a autoridade de poder dizer qual era a verdadeira literatura brasileira, quem tinha o direito de se dizer intelectual e como poderia realizar seu papel. Nesse sentido, as disputas por esse lugar de autoridade evidenciaram tanto as tensões que perpassavam a atividade intelectual no que diz respeito à avaliação da importância de sua prática naquele contexto, quanto à heterogeneidade de representações sobre o fazer literário, construídas pela relação entre estético e ideológico.

Nueva lectura y transcripción del poema 71 de Ausiás March, incluyendo aclaraciones a pasajes previamente mal entendidos. El poema 71 es presentado en el contexto del debate literario medieval pro y antifeminista, y se remarcan sus particularidades dentro de dicha tradición. La atención a sus fuentes culturales se concreta especialmente en un referente inesperado: el Dragmaticon philosophiae de Guillermo de Conches, sobre el papel de la memoria como estimulante sexual en las mujeres., A new reading and transcription of Ausiàs March's poem 71, including explanations to previously misunderstood passages. Poem 71 is presented in the context of the medieval literary debate for and against women, and its particularities within it are remarked. Attention to its cultural sources focuses especially in an unexpected one: William of Conches' s Dragmaticon Philosophiae, on the role of memory as sexual stimulus in women.

In recent decades, the mass media have come to play an increasingly important role in society and culture. Media of every kind permeate not only our politics but our private lives as well. This development has had a great impact on the position of literature and the role of the author. The author now to a large extent has to make him/herself visible both in the literature s/he writes and in an intimate, sometimes symbiotic relationship with the media. The aim of this dissertation is to investigate the dynamic interplay between author, literature and mass media – here represented by newspapers, radio and television – that has manifested itself around the year 2000. In what ways do the media produce the image of the author? How does the author him/herself produce the image of a self through his/her writing and through participation in various media contexts? How do these images relate to one another, and what literary effects do they have on aesthetics and content? In what ways have critics and theorists reacted to this set of problems? These issues are discussed in relation to two authors who in Sweden, indeed throughout Scandinavia, should be regarded as pioneers when it comes to the mediatization of the author in the so-called postmodern era: Carina Rydberg and Stig Larsson. In the dissertation it is shown how they enter the media scene and in their literatures examine the border zone between life and text, fact and fiction, private and public, and how this is received. Chapter 1 analyzes the way Rydberg entered the public arena and presented an image of herself with Den högsta kasten 1997, and subsequently with Djävulsformeln 2000, which both caused intense debate in the media. In Chapter 2 the new kind of hybrid literature that these texts represent regarding fact and fiction is discussed from both a historical and a theoretical point of view. Chapter 3 focuses in turn on Larsson and how he since his debut in the 1970s and especially in Natta de mina from 1997 has explored the thin line between fact and fiction, private and public, at the same time as a biographical legend was constructed around him in the media. Chapter 4 adresses the questions: What are the consequences of the mediatization of Rydberg and Larsson on their authorships? What does it mean to play the biographical card in a media climate in which the categories of fact and fiction, private and public are dismantled? It is shown that issues of gender and cultural position affect mediatization and lead to different outcomes. The dissertation ends with an epilogue concerned with the ways Swedish authors in the beginning of the 21st century are ever more frequently abandoning the purely fictional genres in order to investigate the unstable relationship between fact and fiction. Avhandlingen ges ut av Gidlunds förlag. www.gidlunds.se Den kan köpas i välsorterade boklådor och i de flesta internetbokhandlar.

Agricultural articles in this issue pertain to the problem of electric power distribution to farms, the value of growing soybeans, and the use of summer fallow in wheat production. The first prize descriptive essay is a war reminiscence regarding the Battle of Amiens. Also in this issue is an article on the success of the Livestock Judging Team. Campus news reports on the athletic results, the success of the men's rugby team, and the decreasing number of men attending the Returned Men's Dance. The Alumni column provides an update of alumni activities. This issue does not contain a Macdonald column. Reliance The problem of electrical power on the farm The triumph of Amiens Soy beans Substitutes for the summer fallow Bull baiting Editorial College life Athletics Alumni Locals advertising

This issue begins with a tribute to Dr. J. Hugo Reed, Professor of Veterinary Science. Agricultural articles pertain to creating antifreeze mixtures, the commercial incubator in the poultry industry, and sales efficiency in the dairy industry. Other articles address the meaning of "bluestockings" in literary circles, the value of college debates, and the will of William Dunlop. Published in this issue is the first prize essay for the O. A. C. Review competition. The editorial debates the merits of also publishing a weekly student newspaper and reviving college songs. The highlight of the campus news is the success of the first College Royal. Other campus news reports on a farewell party for alumni leaving to work in Cuba, the Short Course Reception, the annual banquet for the freshmen, and the Union Literary Society meeting. The Alumni column provides an update of alumni activities. The Macdonald Institute column highlights a comparison between Macdonald Institute and Mississippi State College, and a proposed coat-of-arms for the girls. Our College Songs The passing of Dr. J. Hugo Reed, V.S. The Bluestockings The Wonderful Old Man Anti-freeze mixtures Are debates dull? The incubator as a commercial asset Spoonerisms "Where there's a will" A Tragedy of the Wild Sales efficiency That Cross-Word Puzzle Editorial College life The Random Shot Macdonald Alumni Locals advertising