Search

In this study, we investigated the power generation capability of an oscillating wing energy harvester featuring an actively controlled flap positioned at the wing's leading edge. The findings revealed that attaching a leading-edge flap reduces fluid flow separation below the wing's lower surface at the leading edge, resulting in smoother flow and increased velocity near the hinge region. The leading-edge flap increases the pressure difference across the wing's surface, thereby enhancing the overall performance. In addition, the introduction of the leading-edge flap effectively elongates the wing's effective projected length in the heaving direction, leading to increased thrust. We examined flap lengths ranging from 10% to 50% of the chord length, with the maximum pitch angles of the wing and flap varying from 75° to 105° and 30° to 55°, respectively. The optimal power generation was achieved using a flap length of 40% of the chord length, combined with maximum wing and flap pitch angles of 95° and 45°, respectively. These conditions yielded a 29.9% overall power output increase and a 20.2% efficiency improvement compared to the case without the leading-edge flap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we investigated the power generation capability of an oscillating wing energy harvester featuring an actively controlled flap positioned at the wing’s leading edge. The findings revealed that attaching a leading-edge flap reduces fluid flow separation below the wing’s lower surface at the leading edge, resulting in smoother flow and increased velocity near the hinge region. The leading-edge flap increases the pressure difference across the wing’s surface, thereby enhancing the overall performance. In addition, the introduction of the leading-edge flap effectively elongates the wing’s effective projected length in the heaving direction, leading to increased thrust. We examined flap lengths ranging from 10% to 50% of the chord length, with the maximum pitch angles of the wing and flap varying from 75° to 105° and 30° to 55°, respectively. The optimal power generation was achieved using a flap length of 40% of the chord length, combined with maximum wing and flap pitch angles of 95° and 45°, respectively. These conditions yielded a 29.9% overall power output increase and a 20.2% efficiency improvement compared to the case without the leading-edge flap.

Here we analyse aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis during manoeuvres. Chaotic deflections of the upperwing coverts observed using video cameras carried by the bird (50 frames s-1) indicate trailing-edge separation but attached flow near the leading edge during flapping and gust response, and completely stalled flows upon landing. The underwing coverts deflect automatically along the leading edge at high angle of attack. We use high-speed digital video (500 frames s-1) to analyse these deflections in greater detail during perching sequences indoors and outdoors. Outdoor perching sequences usually follow a stereotyped three-phase sequence comprising a glide, pitch-up manoeuvre and deep stall. During deep stall, the spread-eagled bird has aerodynamics reminiscent of a cross-parachute. Deployment of the underwing coverts is closely phased with wing sweeping during the pitch-up manoeuvre, and is accompanied by alula protraction. Surprisingly, active alula protraction is preceded by passive peeling from its tip. Indoor flights follow a stereotyped flapping perching sequence, with deployment of the underwing coverts closely phased with alula protraction and the end of the downstroke. We propose that the underwing coverts operate as an automatic high-lift device, analogous to a Kruger flap. We suggest that the alula operates as a strake, promoting formation of a leading-edge vortex on the swept hand-wing when the arm-wing is completely stalled, and hypothesise that its active protraction is stimulated by its initial passive deflection. These aeroelastic devices appear to be used for flow control to enhance unsteady manoeuvres, and may also provide sensory feedback. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]