Search

Objectives Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a neoplasm of mast cells (MCs) characterized by their proliferation in extracutaneous organs. Systemic mastocytosis includes several entities with different clinical courses and prognoses. The rarity of this disease and the diversity of clinical and morphologic presentation make the diagnosis of SM very challenging. The aim of this review is to share our approach to the diagnosis of SM. Methods We present 4 cases that highlight the spectrum of clinical and laboratory features of SM and outline the diagnostic process with an emphasis on morphology. Results Pathology and laboratory medicine play a key role in investigation of SM, as correct diagnosis requires integration of morphologic, molecular, and serologic findings. In addition to awareness of microscopic findings in SM, a pathologist must keep abreast with an expanding menu of ancillary studies, particularly molecular testing. Conclusions Systemic mastocytosis is a challenging diagnosis that requires not only a demonstration of a clonal proliferation of MCs but also a correct subclassification based on the recently updated criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Mastocytosis is a rare myeloproliferative disease based on clonal hematopoiesis of mast cells, with accumulation of mast cells in various tissues and organs. The cutaneous mastocytosis is common in the pediatric population and, in general, progression to aggressive forms is not typical. In the adult population, there is systemic mastocytosis with a predominance of indolent and smoldering forms according to the literature, but there aren’t epidemiological data for the Russian Federation.Aim. To evaluate the results of primary diagnostics obtained during the examination of 70 patients with suspected systemic mastocytosis.Materials and methods. The histological studies of the skin and bone marrow, mutations in the c-kit gene in the bone marrow and serum tryptase level were examined in the Raisa Gorbacheva Memorial Research Institute for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation in accordance with WHO 2017 criteria.Results. The diagnostic results of 70 patients with suspected mastocytosis, the diagnosis was confirmed in 71.4 % (n = 50) of patients, of which systemic mastocytosis accounted for 82 % (n = 41). The 2 most common categories were identified: indolent systemic mastocytosis in 23 (56 %) patients and widespread forms in 15 (36.5 %), with a median time of diagnosis of 12 and 5 years, respectively.Conclusion. The late diagnosis is noted in all subgroups of systemic mastocytosis.

Background. Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of diseases that are characterized by excessive proliferation and accumulation of clonal (neoplastic) mast cells in one or more organs. Advanced variants of systemic mastocytosis (aggressive systemic mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis associated with hematological neoplasm, and mast cell leukemia) are characterized by infiltration of organs by mast cells, which leads to organs dysfunction. Such patients require a more active approach and the use of cytoreductive therapy. Available therapeutic options include imatinib, interferon-alpha, cladribine. Only one of the targeted drugs is registered in Russia – midostaurin. Midostaurin is a potent multikinase inhibitor that is active against KIT regardless of mutation status. Midostaurin has shown its effectiveness in clinical trials, however, we know that data from real clinical practice often differ from clinical studies due to the characteristics of patients (preserved comorbid status, stable disease parameters) traditionally included in clinical trials.Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of midostaurin in patients with advanced variants of systemic mastocytosis in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. This work analyzed 13 patients (7 (54 %) men and 6 (46 %) women) who received midostaurin therapy for systemic mastocytosis (aggressive systemic mastocytosis – 9 (69 %), systemic mastocytosis associated with a hematological neoplasm – 4 (31 %)). The median age of patients when the diagnosis was verified was 73 (61–87) years, the median age when midostaurin was prescribed was 74 (61–88) years. According to the International prognostic scoring system for mastocytosis (IPSM) based on clinical variables, patients are classified as follows groups: SM1 – 1 (8 %) patient, SM2 – 3 (23 %), SM3 – 8 (61 %), SM4 – 1 (8 %).Results. As a result of therapy, clinical improvement was achieved in 10 (77 %) patients, and stabilization in 3 (23 %) patients. During midostaurin therapy, grade I–II adverse events were noted from the gastrointestinal tract: nausea in 5 patients (38 %), vomiting in 2 (15 %), diarrhea in 6 (46 %). Hematological toxicity of grade I–II was also observed: anemia in 6 (46 %) patients, thrombocytopenia in 5 (38 %) patients. The median overall survival in the group was not achieved. The 2-year overall survival rate was 75 %.Conclusion. The study results suggest the potential efficacy and safety of midostaurin in patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis and systemic mastocytosis associated with hematological malignancies.

Our knowledge of biology and mast cell (MC) function, as well as disorders associated with the pathologic activation of MCs, has evolved over the last few decades. Anaphylaxis, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and mastocytosis are interrelated yet distinct conditions within the spectrum of mast cell activation disorders. Nevertheless, all three conditions can co-exist in one and the same patient, as pathologic MC activation is the key finding in all three. When mediator release is excessive and involves multiple systems, anaphylaxis and MCAS may occur. Furthermore, mastocytosis is a clonal disorder of MCs and often presents with anaphylaxis and MCAS. Nevertheless, in some cases, even the proliferative and accumulative features of MCs in mastocytosis can account for symptoms and disease progression. In each case, diagnosis can be only made when the diagnostic consensus criteria are fulfilled. The current article aims to provide a concise clinical update and pinpoint the main difficulties in diagnosing these puzzling disorders of MCs in medical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

KIT, a type III tyrosine kinase receptor, plays a crucial role in haematopoietic development. The KIT receptor forms a dimer after ligand binding; this activates tyrosine kinase activity leading to downstream signal transduction. The D816V KIT mutation is extensively implicated in haematological malignancies, including mastocytosis and leukaemia. KIT D816V is constitutively active, but the molecular nuances that lead to constitutive tyrosine kinase activity are unclear. For the first time, we present experimental evidence that the KIT D816V mutant does not dimerize like KIT wild type. We further show evidence of decreased stabilization of the tyrosine kinase domain in the KIT D816V mutant, a phenomenon that might contribute to its constitutive activity. Since the mechanism of KIT D816V activation varies from that of the wild type, we explored downstream signal transduction events and found that even though KIT D816V targets similar signalling moieties, the signalling is amplified in the mutant compared to stem cell factor‐activated wild type receptor. Uniquely, KIT D816V induces infection‐related pathways and the spliceosome pathway, providing alternate options for selective as well as combinatorial therapeutic targeting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anaphylactic reactions are a well-known feature of mastocytosis, particularly in relation to hymenoptera venom stings. Although data on the frequency of drug hypersensitivity reactions is limited in mastocytosis, it is hypothesized that these patients may be predisposed to hypersensitivity reactions to certain drugs, including antibiotics. Nevertheless, this issue has not been systematically investigated. Thus, we investigate the prevalence and clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions to antibiotics (HRA) in mastocytosis. Methods: A 15-year retrospective study was conducted among 239 (≥18 years old) consecutive mastocytosis patients who were investigated in our center. All patients underwent a thorough allergy work-up, where self-reported reactions were individually evaluated by an allergist. Results: Overall, 34 patients (14.2%) were deemed to have HRA. Most patients reacted with cutaneous symptoms (74%), and anaphylaxis was rare, confirmed only in two of 34 patients (0.8%). Beta-lactams were the most common elicitors (63%). There were no differences in age, gender, atopic status and tryptase levels between mastocytosis patients with and without antibiotic hypersensitivity. Conclusions: The present study indicates a similar prevalence of HRA in mastocytosis compared to those of the general population. Moreover, antibiotics appear to be rare elicitors of anaphylaxis in these patients. Hence, our results suggest that mastocytosis patients without a history of HRA may be treated with these drugs without special precautions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mast cells (MCs) represent a population of hematopoietic cells with a key role in innate and adaptive immunity and are well known for their detrimental role in allergic responses. Yet, MCs occur in low abundance, which hampers their detailed molecular analysis. Here, we capitalized on the potential of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to give rise to all cells in the body and established a novel and robust protocol for human iPS cell differentiation toward MCs. Relying on a panel of systemic mastocytosis (SM) patient-specific iPS cell lines carrying the KIT D816V mutation, we generated functional MCs that recapitulate SM disease features: increased number of MCs, abnormal maturation kinetics and activated phenotype, CD25 and CD30 surface expression and a transcriptional signature characterized by upregulated expression of innate and inflammatory response genes. Therefore, human iPS cell-derived MCs are a reliable, inexhaustible, and close-to-human tool for disease modeling and pharmacological screening to explore novel MC therapeutics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our knowledge of biology and mast cell (MC) function, as well as disorders associated with the pathologic activation of MCs, has evolved over the last few decades. Anaphylaxis, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and mastocytosis are interrelated yet distinct conditions within the spectrum of mast cell activation disorders. Nevertheless, all three conditions can co-exist in one and the same patient, as pathologic MC activation is the key finding in all three. When mediator release is excessive and involves multiple systems, anaphylaxis and MCAS may occur. Furthermore, mastocytosis is a clonal disorder of MCs and often presents with anaphylaxis and MCAS. Nevertheless, in some cases, even the proliferative and accumulative features of MCs in mastocytosis can account for symptoms and disease progression. In each case, diagnosis can be only made when the diagnostic consensus criteria are fulfilled. The current article aims to provide a concise clinical update and pinpoint the main difficulties in diagnosing these puzzling disorders of MCs in medical practice.

Copyright of Revue Francaise d'Allergologie is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal neoplasm driven by the KIT D816V mutation and has a broad range of debilitating symptoms. In this study, the authors evaluated SM disease perceptions and management strategies among US health care providers (HCPs).Methods: Hematologist/oncologist (H/O) HCPs and allergist/immunologist (A/I) HCPs who were treating four or more patients with SM completed an online, 51-item TouchStone HCP Survey, which queried provider characteristics, perceptions of disease burden, and current management. Descriptive analyses by specialty and SM subtype were performed.Results: Of 304 HCPs contacted, 111 (37%) met eligibility criteria, including 51% A/I specialists and 49% H/O specialists. On average, the HCPs had 14 years of practice experience and cared for 20 patients with SM. A/I HCPs saw more patients with nonadvanced SM (78%) compared with H/O HCPs, who saw similar proportions of patients with nonadvanced SM (54%) and advanced SM (46%). HCPs reported testing 75% of patients for the KIT D816V mutation and found an estimated prevalence of 47%. On average, HCPs estimated 8 months between symptom onset and SM diagnosis. HCPs reported that 62% of patients with indolent SM felt depressed or discouraged because of symptoms. In terms of treatment goals for SM, both types of specialists prioritized symptom improvement for nonadvanced SM and improved survival for advanced SM while also prioritizing improving patient quality of life.Conclusions: Both A/I and H/O specialists highlighted unmet needs for patients with SM. The HCPs surveyed reported a lower rate of KIT D816V mutations and a perceived shorter time between symptom onset and SM diagnosis compared with published estimates.Lay Summary: Specialists treating systemic mastocytosis (SM) completed a 51-item questionnaire about their clinical practices and perceptions of disease impact. The study included 111 hematology, oncology, allergy, and immunology physicians. Physicians reported that most patients had nonadvanced disease, yet SM symptoms significantly disrupted their patients' lives. Physicians estimated that SM is diagnosed within months of symptom onset, in contrast with published reports of years' long delays reported by patients with SM. This study identified unmet needs that can inform educational and patient management priorities in this rare disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The term mastocytosis denotes a heterogeneous group of rare disorders characterized by abnormal accumulation and activation of mast cells in various organs. Based on the WHO classification, mastocytosis can essentially be split into indolent and advanced systemic disease. Indolent mastocytosis is the most prevalent variant in adults. In our retrospective study, we aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with mastocytosis attending our center over the last 15 years. We found that most patients in our cohort suffered from the indolent variant of mastocytosis. Furthermore, we determined the overall prevalence of mastocytosis in our region to be one case per 10,000 adults. In addition, overall survival was significantly better in indolent mastocytosis patients compared to patients with advanced disease. Therefore, awareness of differences in the prognoses of patients with indolent and advanced mastocytosis is important. Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare, clonal, clinically heterogeneous disorder of the mast cells (MCs), and mainly affects adults. The present study aims to describe the clinical and laboratory features as well as the outcomes of SM. A 15-year retrospective study was conducted on 195 consecutive SM patients (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed in 2006–2020 at the Multidisciplinary Mastocytosis Center at Karolinska University Hospital. Patients with indolent SM (ISM) represented the most common SM variant (88.2%). Furthermore, the frequencies of aggressive SM and SM with associated non-mast-cell hematological neoplasm were 4.1% and 7.7%, respectively. The prevalence of SM in the adult population of the Stockholm region was estimated to be 10.6/100,000 inhabitants, and the mean incidence of SM cases in the Stockholm region was 0.77/100,000 people per year. In this series, tryptase levels were below 20 ng/mL in 51 patients (26%). Osteoporosis was present in 21.9% of all cases. Interestingly, there was no progression from ISM to advanced SM variants in our study. Furthermore, overall survival was significantly better in ISM patients compared to advanced SM patients (p < 0.0001). Our data suggest that the early recognition and correct diagnosis of SM has prognostic significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is a rare malignant disease with a poor prognosis due to the drug resistance of neoplastic mast cells. We found that drugs targeting the cell cycle regulators CDK4 and CDK6 profoundly suppress the growth and survival of neoplastic mast cells. Furthermore, these drugs can overcome resistance against KIT D816V-targeting drugs, including midostaurin, in neoplastic mast cells. Finally, the CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors applied induced apoptosis in CD34+/CD38− stem cells in AdvSM. Based on these results, we believe that CDK4/CDK6 inhibition may be a new and interesting therapeutic approach with curative potential for AdvSM. Whether combinations of KIT D816-targeting drugs and CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors can induce long-term remission in patients with AdvSM remains to be determined in clinical trials. In most patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM), neoplastic mast cells (MC) express KIT D816V. However, despite their disease-modifying potential, KIT D816V-targeting drugs, including midostaurin and avapritinib, may not produce long-term remissions in all patients. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and CDK6 are promising targets in oncology. We found that shRNA-mediated knockdown of CDK4 and CDK6 results in growth arrest in the KIT D816V+ MC line HMC-1.2. The CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib suppressed the proliferation in primary neoplastic MC as well as in all HMC-1 and ROSA cell subclones that were examined. Abemaciclib was also found to block growth in the drug-resistant MC line MCPV-1, whereas no effects were seen with palbociclib and ribociclib. Anti-proliferative drug effects on MC were accompanied by cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors were found to synergize with the KIT-targeting drugs midostaurin, avapritinib, and nintedanib in inducing growth inhibition and apoptosis in neoplastic MCs. Finally, we found that CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors induce apoptosis in CD34+/CD38− stem cells in AdvSM. Together, CDK4/CDK6 inhibition is a potent approach to suppress the growth of neoplastic cells in AdvSM. Whether CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors can improve clinical outcomes in patients with AdvSM remains to be determined in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mast cells (MCs) represent a population of hematopoietic cells with a key role in innate and adaptive immunity and are well known for their detrimental role in allergic responses. Yet, MCs occur in low abundance, which hampers their detailed molecular analysis. Here, we capitalized on the potential of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to give rise to all cells in the body and established a novel and robust protocol for human iPS cell differentiation toward MCs. Relying on a panel of systemic mastocytosis (SM) patient-specific iPS cell lines carrying the KIT D816V mutation, we generated functional MCs that recapitulate SM disease features: increased number of MCs, abnormal maturation kinetics and activated phenotype, CD25 and CD30 surface expression and a transcriptional signature characterized by upregulated expression of innate and inflammatory response genes. Therefore, human iPS cell-derived MCs are a reliable, inexhaustible, and close-to-human tool for disease modeling and pharmacological screening to explore novel MC therapeutics.

Activating mutations in KIT , particularly D816V, have been associated with mastocytosis. Additionally, expression of heterozygous KIT M541L has been primarily reported in patients with pediatric mastocytosis. We thus examined the prevalence of this variant in pediatric and adult patients with mastocytosis ( n = 100) compared to ancestry-matched 1000 genomes controls ( n = 500) and patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis ( n = 23). We then compared clinical symptoms and laboratory data on patients with systemic and cutaneous mastocytosis and bone marrow histopathology on a matched cohort with and without the KIT M541L variant. Overall, the KIT M541L variant was identified in 19 individuals; the majority were diagnosed with systemic mastocytosis (89.4%) with an associated KIT D816V mutation. There were no significant differences in peripheral blood parameters between groups. Patients with mastocytosis carrying the KIT M541L variant did not demonstrate significant differences in symptomatology compared to a matched reference cohort ( n = 13/81) without KIT M541L. In patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis, no significant associations were observed. This study uniquely examines the prevalence and impact of the KIT M541L variant in both adult and pediatric patients with mastocytosis further stratified by disease variant. To our knowledge, this is the first case/control study to show a significant genetic association with mastocytosis at the KIT M541L locus.

Background: Anaphylaxis is a common feature of patients with mastocytosis, particularly with Hymenoptera venoms. Hence, it is hypothesized that patients with mastocytosis may have an increased susceptibility to developing drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA). Patients and medical practitioners are therefore concerned when there is a need to use various drugs. However, this issue has not been systematically investigated., Objective: To investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of anaphylaxis to various types of drugs among patients with mastocytosis., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 470 consecutive patients (18 years and older) with confirmed clonal mast cell diseases recruited from 2 independent mastocytosis reference centers. All patients underwent a comprehensive, individualized allergy workup with evaluation of the (self)reported drug hypersensitivity., Results: The overall prevalence of DIA was 6.3%, accounting for one-third of the confirmed drug hypersensitivity reactions. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common elicitors of DIA (56%), followed by perioperative agents (23%) and antibiotics (13%). Anaphylactic reactions were severe in most cases, with 43% of patients experiencing hypotensive syncope. All drug-related hypersensitivity reactions occurred before mastocytosis was diagnosed., Conclusions: The prevalence of DIA in mastocytosis tends to be higher than in the general population, but is overall low. However, its severity is more pronounced. Our results suggest that patients with mastocytosis with a previous reaction to drugs should undergo a thorough allergy workup. Well-tolerated drugs can be further used without specific precautions., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Summary: We report on 45 patients with myeloid neoplasms and concurrent Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F and KIT proto‐oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) D816V (JAK2pos./KITpos.) mutations, which are individually identified in >60% of patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and >90% of patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) respectively. In SM, the concurrent presence of a clonal non‐mast cell neoplasm [SM with associated haematological neoplasm (SM‐AHN)] usually constitutes a distinct subtype associated with poor survival. All 45 patients presented with a heterogeneous combination of clinical/morphological features typical of the individual disorders (e.g. leuco‐/erythro‐/thrombocytosis and elevated lactate dehydrogenase for MPN; elevated serum tryptase and alkaline phosphatase for SM). Overlapping features identified in 70% of patients included splenomegaly, cytopenia(s), bone marrow fibrosis and additional somatic mutations. Molecular dissection revealed discordant development of variant allele frequency for both mutations and absence of concurrently positive single‐cell derived colonies, indicating disease evolution in two independent clones rather than monoclonal disease in >60% of patients examined. Overall survival of JAK2pos./KITpos. patients without additional somatic high‐risk mutations [HRM, e.g. in serine and arginine‐rich splicing factor 2 (SRSF2), additional sex combs like‐1 (ASXL1) or Runt‐related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1)] at 5 years was 77%, indicating that the mutual impact of JAK2 V617F and KIT D816V on prognosis is fundamentally different from the adverse impact of additional HRM in the individual disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (iMCAS) is characterized by severe, episodic systemic mast cell (MC) activation and mediator-related symptoms, an event-related increase in serum tryptase levels, and response to MC-targeted therapies in the absence of underlying IgE-mediated allergy or clonal MC disorder. Studies indicating its prevalence using evidence-based diagnostic criteria are lacking., Objective: To assess the prevalence and clinical and laboratory features of patients with iMCAS., Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of data from 703 consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) referred to our center based on suspicion of having MC disorders. Patients underwent a thorough clinical workup including patient history, allergy tests, KIT D816V mutation analysis, and/or bone marrow investigation. Disease activity was prospectively assessed during follow-up visits., Results: We identified 31 patients with confirmed iMCAS. Furthermore, hereditary α-tryptasemia was detected in three patients with baseline tryptase levels greater than 8 ng/mL. The most common clinical presentation during MCAS episodes was mucocutaneous symptoms in patients with iMCAS, especially urticaria or angioedema. However, these symptoms were less prevalent in patients with clonal MCAS (P = .015). The duration of diagnostic delay was significantly longer in patients with iMCAS compared to those with clonal MCAS (P = .02)., Conclusions: The overall prevalence of iMCAS was 4.4% in the entire cohort, which indicates that iMCAS is an uncommon condition. To accurately diagnose iMCAS, it is crucial to evaluate suspected patients using the three diagnostic MCAS criteria. This involves performing a comprehensive allergy work-up including laboratory tests and ultrasensitive mutation analysis of KIT D816V. Subsequently, recommended diagnostic algorithms should be applied., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic has massively distorted our health care systems and caused catastrophic consequences in our affected communities. The number of victims continues to increase, and patients at risk can only be protected to a degree, because the virulent state may be asymptomatic. Risk factors concerning COVID-19–induced morbidity and mortality include advanced age, an impaired immune system, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cancer treated with chemotherapy. Here, we discuss the risk and impact of COVID-19 in patients with mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndromes. Because no published data are yet available, expert opinions are, by necessity, based on case experience and reports from patients. Although the overall risk to acquire the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may not be elevated in mast cell disease, certain conditions may increase the risk of infected patients to develop severe COVID-19. These factors include certain comorbidities, mast cell activation–related events affecting the cardiovascular or bronchopulmonary system, and chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, such treatments should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis during a COVID-19 infection. In contrast, other therapies, such as anti–mediator-type drugs, venom immunotherapy, or vitamin D, should be continued. Overall, patients with mast cell disorders should follow the general and local guidelines in the COVID-19 pandemic and advice from their medical provider. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In systemic mastocytosis (SM), qualitative and serial quantitative assessment of the KIT D816V mutation is of diagnostic and prognostic relevance. We investigated peripheral blood and bone marrow samples of 161 patients (indolent SM (ISM), n = 40; advanced SM, AdvSM, n = 121) at referral and during follow-up for the KIT D816V variant allele frequency (VAF) at the DNA-level and the KIT D816V expressed allele burden (EAB) at the RNA-level. A round robin test with four participating laboratories revealed an excellent correlation (r > 0.99, R2 > 0.98) between three different DNA-assays. VAF and EAB strongly correlated in ISM (r = 0.91, coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.84) but only to a lesser extent in AdvSM (r = 0.71; R2 = 0.5). However, as compared to an EAB/VAF ratio ≤2 (cohort A, 77/121 patients, 64%) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an EAB/VAF ratio of >2 (cohort B, 44/121 patients, 36%) as predictive for an advanced phenotype and a significantly inferior median survival (3.3 vs. 11.7 years; p = 0.005). In terms of overall survival, Cox-regression analysis was only significant for the EAB/VAF ratio >2 (p = 0.006) but not for VAF or EAB individually. This study demonstrates for the first time that the transcriptional activity of KIT D816V may play an important role in the pathophysiology of SM.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal hematologic neoplasm, driven, in almost all cases, by the activating KIT D816V mutation that leads to the growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells. While patients with advanced forms of SM have a poor prognosis, the introduction of KIT inhibitors (e.g., midostaurin, and avapritinib) has changed their outlook. Because of the heterogenous nature of advanced SM (advSM), successive iterations of response criteria have tried to capture different dimensions of the disease, including measures of mast cell burden (percentage of bone marrow mast cells and serum tryptase level), and mast cell-related organ damage (referred to as C findings). Historically, response criteria have been anchored to reversion of one or more organ damage finding(s) as a minimal criterion for response. This is a central principle of the Valent criteria, Mayo criteria, and International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment and European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (IWG-MRT-ECNM) consensus criteria. Irrespective of the response criteria, an ever-present challenge is how to apply response criteria in patients with SM and an associated hematologic neoplasm, where the presence of both diseases complicates assignment of organ damage and adjudication of response. In the context of trials with the selective KIT D816V inhibitor avapritinib, pure pathologic response (PPR) criteria, which rely solely on measures of mast cell burden and exclude consideration of organ damage findings, are being explored as more robust surrogate of overall survival. In addition, the finding that avapritinib can elicit complete molecular responses of KIT D816V allele burden, establishes a new benchmark for advSM and motivates the inclusion of definitions for molecular response in future criteria. Herein, we also outline how the concept of PPR can inform a proposal for new response criteria which use a tiered evaluation of pathologic, molecular, and clinical responses.

Summary: The use of allele‐specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction to identify KIT D816V in the peripheral blood of adults with mastocytosis has been reported to have value in the diagnosis, assessment of disease burden and management of this disease. To examine the value of this assay in children with cutaneous manifestations of mastocytosis, we assessed data on 65 patients with all variants of paediatric‐onset mastocytosis, including those known to have systemic disease, to correlate KIT mutation status with clinical findings, serum tryptase levels and bone marrow histopathology. We found that KIT D816V was not identified in the peripheral blood of children known to have only cutaneous disease (specificity 100%) but was found in those known to have both cutaneous and systemic/probable systemic disease (sensitivity of 85·2%). These findings were the basis of the development of an algorithm to assist in the decision for when to perform a bone marrow biopsy in children presenting with cutaneous manifestations of mastocytosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mastocytosis is characterized by expansion and activation of clonally aberrant mast cells (MCs) in one or more organ systems. Inappropriate MC activation is a key finding in both allergy and mastocytosis; therefore, symptoms in both conditions show some degree of overlap. When mediator release is excessive and involves multiple systems, anaphylaxis may occur. In mastocytosis, the prevalence of atopy is similar to those of the general population, whereas the incidence of anaphylaxis is significantly higher. The purpose of this review is to discuss features of allergy and anaphylaxis as well as the principles of managing MC mediator release symptoms in mastocytosis., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: We discuss recent developments in the treatment of advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM) with inhibitors of the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase.Recent Findings: advSM is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms of poor prognosis characterized by the accumulation of neoplastic mast cells. The canonical KIT D816V mutation is present in approximately 90% of SM patients, and its detection is critical for both diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. The multikinase/KIT inhibitor midostaurin was recently approved for advSM. This agent can reverse SM-related organ damage and disease symptoms, and decrease the bone marrow mast cell burden and splenomegaly. However, complete remissions are rare and durability of responses is variable. Potent and selective KIT D816V inhibitors including avapritinib (BLU-285) and DCC-2618 have entered clinical trials, and rational combination strategies are under development.Summary: The clinical efficacy of KIT inhibitors validate KIT as a key oncogenic driver in mast cell neoplasms. An improved understanding of the genetic heterogeneity beyond KIT will help inform the dynamics of response and relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) may suffer from mast cell (MC) mediator-related symptoms insufficiently controlled by conventional therapy. Omalizumab is an established treatment in other MC-driven diseases, but experiences in SM are limited. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in SM. Methods In our patient cohort, we evaluated all SM patients treated with omalizumab. A physician global assessment of type and severity of symptoms was performed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months and at latest follow-up. Quality of life was assessed by visual analogue scale. S-tryptase and KIT D816V allele burden were monitored. Results A total of 14 adult SM patients (10 ISM, 2 BMM, 1 SSM, and 1 ASM-AHN) received omalizumab with a median duration of 17 months (range: 1-73 months). One patient was excluded due to concomitant cytoreductive therapy. In the remaining 13 patients, we observed a significant reduction in symptoms, with complete symptom control in five (38.5%), major response in three (23.1%), and a partial response in three (23.1%) patients, whereas two patients (15.4%) withdrew due to subjective side-effects at first dose. The treatment was most effective for recurrent anaphylaxis and skin symptoms, less for gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Patient-reported quality of life showed significant improvement. No significant changes in s-tryptase/ KIT D816V allele burden were observed. No severe adverse events were recorded. Conclusions Omalizumab appears to be a promising treatment option in SM, effectively preventing anaphylaxis and improving chronic MC mediator-related symptoms, insufficiently controlled by conventional therapy. Controlled studies are needed to substantiate findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mastocytosis is a hematopoietic neoplasm defined by abnormal expansion and focal accumulation of clonal tissue mast cells in various organ-systems. The disease exhibits a complex pathology and an equally complex clinical behavior. The classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) divides mastocytosis into cutaneous forms, systemic variants, and localized mast cell tumors. In >80% of patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM), a somatic point mutation in KIT at codon 816 is found. Whereas patients with indolent forms of the disease have a normal or near-normal life expectancy, patients with advanced mast cell neoplasms, including aggressive SM and mast cell leukemia, have a poor prognosis with short survival times. In a majority of these patients, multiple somatic mutations and/or an associated hematologic neoplasm, such as a myeloid leukemia, may be detected. Independent of the category of mastocytosis and the serum tryptase level, patients may suffer from mediator-related symptoms and/or osteopathy. Depending on the presence of co-morbidities, the symptomatology in such patients may be mild, severe or even life-threatening. Most relevant co-morbidities in such patients are IgE-dependent allergies, psychiatric, psychological or mental problems, and vitamin D deficiency. The diagnosis and management of mastocytosis is an emerging challenge in clinical practice and requires vast knowledge, a multidisciplinary approach, and personalized medicine procedures. In this article, the current knowledge about mastocytosis is reviewed with special emphasis on the multidisciplinary aspects of the disease and related challenges in daily practice.

FLT3 fusions are associated with myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia. We describe a patient presenting with clinicopathologic features of both chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS) and systemic mastocytosis (SM). The bone marrow demonstrated a myeloproliferative neoplasm with eosinophilia and aggregates of atypical mast cells. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a t(13;14)(q12;q32), which was subsequently molecularly characterized as a novel TRIP11-FLT3 rearrangement. A KIT D816V mutation was also identified. The patient rapidly transformed to T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and expired shortly after diagnosis. This is the fifth FLT3 fusion gene described in the literature; the presence of both myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms implicates involvement of an early hematopoietic progenitor by rearranged FLT3. We suggest that leukemias and lymphomas with FLT3 fusion genes exhibit similar clinicopathologic features to, and should be included in, the WHO category of “Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA , PDGFRB , or FGFR1 , or with PCM1-JAK2 .” [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study which describes the frequency and molecular characteristics of double/compound KIT mutations in systemic mastocytosis (SM). The study involves patients with diagnosis of SM per 2008 World Health Organization criteria who were screened for mutations targeting KIT coding regions. The study found mutations distributed across exons, suggesting an incomplete annotation of KIT mutations in SM.

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms defined by a numerical increase and accumulation of clonal mast cells (MCs) in various organ systems. The disease may present as cutaneous mastocytosis or systemic mastocytosis (SM). On the basis of histopathological and molecular features, clinical variables, and organ involvement, SM is divided into indolent SM, smoldering SM, SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm, aggressive SM, and MC leukemia. Each variant is defined by unique diagnostic criteria and a unique spectrum of clinical presentations. A key driver of MC expansion and disease evolution is the oncogenic machinery triggered by mutant forms of KIT . The genetic background, additional somatic mutations, and comorbidities also contribute to the course and prognosis. Patients with SM may also suffer from mediator-related symptoms or even an MC activation syndrome. This article provides an update of concepts on the genetics, etiology, and pathology of mastocytosis, with emphasis on diagnostic criteria and new treatment concepts.

Purpose: Activating KIT mutations are part of the pathogenesis of systemic mastocytosis (SM). Nilotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently inhibits activated forms of KIT. This phase 2, open-label, single-arm study (CAMN107A2101; NCT00109707) evaluated nilotinib in patients with SM. Methods: Patients with SM [aggressive SM (ASM), indolent SM, or other] received nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. C-findings were collected retrospectively to assess response using criteria proposed after trial initiation. Response was evaluated using improvements in laboratory findings (for all patients) and ASM response criteria (for the ASM subgroup). Results: In 61 patients enrolled, the median nilotinib exposure was 232 days (range 3-1274 days) with a median follow-up of 34.7 months. In patients with ASM ( n = 37), the overall response rate was 21.6 %. In the eight responders, all of whom had a KIT D816V mutation at any time, mast cell infiltration and tryptase level decreased by 70 % and 29.8 %, respectively; absolute neutrophil count increased by 94.7 %. Laboratory parameters also improved in the non-ASM subgroups. Overall survival at 24 months was 81.2 % (95 % CI 70.6-91.8 %) with median survival not yet reached. New or worsening grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (10.3 %), anemia (10.0 %), and neutropenia (6.9 %). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic drug-related AEs were diarrhea (6.6 %) and headache (4.9 %). Eleven patients (9 with ASM, 2 with MCL) died, 10 due to progressive disease; 7 deaths occurred ≥28 days after treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily was effective in some patients with SM, including patients with mutated KIT D816V. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Bone marrow (BM) biopsy specimens involved by systemic mastocytosis (SM) typically show multifocal, compact, dense aggregates of spindled mast cells (MCs). However, some cases lack aggregate formation and fulfill the World Health Organization 2008 criteria for SM, based on minor criteria. Methods: We identified 26 BM cases of KIT D816V- mutated, morphologically occult SM in the BM. Results: All patients had some combination of allergic/ MC activating symptoms. Peripheral blood counts were generally normal. BM aspirates showed 5% or less MCs, which were only occasionally spindled. BM biopsy specimens showed no morphologic classic MC lesions. Tryptase immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated interstitial, individually distributed MCs (up to 5%) with prominent spindling, lacking aggregate formation. MCs coexpressed CD25 by IHC and/or flow cytometry. Spindled MCs constituted more than 25% of total MCs in all cases and more than 50% in 20 of 26 cases. Conclusions: Morphologically occult involvement of normalappearing BM by SM will be missed without appropriate clinical suspicion and pathologic evaluation by tryptase and CD25 IHC and KIT D816V mutation analysis. On the basis of these findings, we propose a cost-effective, data-driven, evidence-based algorithmic approach to the workup of these cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mastocytosis is an emerging differential diagnosis in patients with more or less specific mediator-related symptoms. In some of these patients, typical skin lesions are found and the diagnosis of mastocytosis can be established. In other cases, however, skin lesions are absent, which represents a diagnostic challenge. In the light of this unmet need, we developed a diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected mastocytosis. In adult patients with typical lesions of mastocytosis in the skin, a bone marrow ( BM) biopsy should be considered, regardless of the basal serum tryptase concentration. In adults without skin lesions who suffer from mediator-related or other typical symptoms, the basal tryptase level is an important parameter. In those with a slightly increased tryptase level, additional investigations, including a sensitive KIT mutation analysis of blood leucocytes or measurement of urinary histamine metabolites, may be helpful. In adult patients in whom (i) KIT D816V is detected and/or (ii) the basal serum tryptase level is clearly increased (>25-30 ng/ml) and/or (iii) other clinical or laboratory features suggest the presence of 'occult' mastocytosis or another haematologic neoplasm, a BM investigation is recommended. In the absence of KIT D816V and other signs or symptoms of mastocytosis or another haematopoietic disease, no BM investigation is required, but the clinical course and tryptase levels are monitored in the follow-up. In paediatric patients, a BM investigation is usually not required, even if the tryptase level is increased. Although validation is required, it can be expected that the algorithm proposed herein will facilitate the management of patients with suspected mastocytosis and help avoid unnecessary referrals and investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a consensus proposal aimed at refining the classification and terminology of mast cell leukemia (MCL) and related disorders. Novel aspects in the classification include the delineation into chronic MCL and acute MCL, and the definition of patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM) who are transforming or have a high risk of transformation, into MCL, termed ASM-t.Mast cell leukemia (MCL), the leukemic manifestation of systemic mastocytosis (SM), is characterized by leukemic expansion of immature mast cells (MCs) in the bone marrow (BM) and other internal organs; and a poor prognosis. In a subset of patients, circulating MCs are detectable. A major differential diagnosis to MCL is myelomastocytic leukemia (MML). Although criteria for both MCL and MML have been published, several questions remain concerning terminologies and subvariants. To discuss open issues, the EU/US-consensus group and the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) launched a series of meetings and workshops in 2011–2013. Resulting discussions and outcomes are provided in this article. The group recommends that MML be recognized as a distinct condition defined by mastocytic differentiation in advanced myeloid neoplasms without evidence of SM. The group also proposes that MCL be divided into acute MCL and chronic MCL, based on the presence or absence of C-Findings. In addition, a primary (de novo) form of MCL should be separated from secondary MCL that typically develops in the presence of a known antecedent MC neoplasm, usually aggressive SM (ASM) or MC sarcoma. For MCL, an imminent prephase is also proposed. This prephase represents ASM with rapid progression and 5%–19% MCs in BM smears, which is generally accepted to be of prognostic significance. We recommend that this condition be termed ASM in transformation to MCL (ASM-t). The refined classification of MCL fits within and extends the current WHO classification; and should improve prognostication and patient selection in practice as well as in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]