1. Communal land and agricultural productivity
- Author
-
Jan Grobovsek and Charles Gottlieb
- Subjects
Economics and Econometrics ,Labour economics ,General equilibrium theory ,Natural resource economics ,growth and development ,Context (language use) ,Development ,jel:O40 ,0502 economics and business ,Economics ,050207 economics ,Agricultural productivity ,Communal land ,Productivity ,050205 econometrics ,business.industry ,agricultural productivity ,05 social sciences ,economics ,Terms of trade ,misallocation ,Agricultural Productivity, Growth and Development, Misallocation, Land ,land ,jel:O13 ,Agriculture ,Expropriation ,Africa ,jel:O55 ,jel:O10 ,jel:Q15 ,Ethiopia ,business ,social sciences - Abstract
This paper quantifies the aggregate impact of communal land tenure ar- rangements that prevail in Sub-Saharan Africa. Such tenure regimes limit land transfer- ability by prohibiting sales, subjecting rented-out land to the risk of expropriation, and redistributing it to existing farmers in a progressive fashion. We use a general equilibrium two-sector selection model featuring agents heterogeneous in skills to compute the result- ing occupational and operational choices as well as land allocations. The quantification of the model is based on policies deduced from Ethiopia. In the Sub-Saharan African context we find that such policies substantially dampen nominal agricultural relative to non-agricultural productivity, by 25%. Real relative agricultural productivity, however, only falls by 4% since cross-sectoral terms of trade adjust strongly, with excess agricul- tural employment only amounting to some 1.5 percentage points. The loss in GDP is small, about 2%. That serves as a reminder that ostensibly highly distortionary policies need not have substantial bite when individuals strategically adjust to them and equilib- rium prices adapt. For example, the model predicts that at given prices 62% of farmers in an economy such as Ethiopia would leave farming if tenure were secured, casting land insecurity as a major obstacle. Yet only 9% would actually switch sectors after price adjustments are factored in.
- Published
- 2019