Search

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare optical quality results obtained in laboratory analysis (in vitro) versus clinical data (in vivo). Methods: The optical quality of ISOPure intraocular lens was assessed both in vitro and in vivo using the modulation transfer function (MTF) for 3.0 and 4.5 mm pupil diameters. In vitro measurements were obtained using deflectometer NIMO TRF1504, while in vivo measurements were taken with OPD-Scan III in a set of patients implanted with this lens. Ray tracing techniques were used to determine the MTF and area under MTF curve (MTFa) from the measured wavefront for the isolated lens and for the whole eye. Results: The MTF of the isolated lens obtained under both in vitro and in vivo conditions showed comparable results for both pupil sizes. However, differences were found when comparing the MTF of the whole eye with the lens implanted versus the MTF measured in vitro for 4.5 mm pupil size. Also, the MTFa defocus curve was compared with the defocus curve measured in vivo. Conclusion: The defocus curve from the in vivo study aligns closely with the MTFa of the in vitro model, with a useful defocus range of 0.40D. Thus, it is possible to anticipate the visual results of the implanted isofocal lens by using measurements on an optical bench and conducting optical simulations. Key messages: What is known • Extended depth of focus (EDoF) lenses are prominent for expanding vision range in pseudophakic eyes, exceeding traditional limits. • The ISOPure lens is characterized as a bi-aspheric refractive design that produces an extended depth of focus design. What is new • The MTF of the isolated lens obtained under both in vitro and in vivo conditions showed comparable results. • The defocus curve from the in vivo study aligns closely with the MTFa of the in vitro model, with a useful defocus range of 0.40D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Spektrum der Augenheilkunde is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema (UGH) syndrome results from contact between the intraocular lens (IOL) and the iris or ciliary body, leading to uveal structure erosion and blood-aqueous barrier breakdown. Treatment involves various drugs, with IOL removal often being necessary. Diagnosis relies on clinical signs, but imaging techniques like ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) or anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) are crucial. AS-OCT accurately depicts IOL position and potential contact, emerging as a primary alternative to UBM in the diagnosis. Our study aimed to correlate AS-OCT findings with clinically detectable iris atrophy in pseudophakic patients with IOL-iris chafing and UGH syndrome. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with UGH syndrome presenting at the Ocular Immunology Unit of Reggio Emilia, Italy, from January 2019 to August 2023. Patients' data were collected. Ophthalmological exams and imaging were performed. The peephole sign in AS-OCT images was evaluated. Statistical analyses were conducted, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. Results: The study reviewed 22 eyes of 22 patients with UGH syndrome. Four eyes were excluded, leaving 18 patients (8 females, 10 males). Common misdiagnoses included idiopathic anterior uveitis (55.5%) and herpetic anterior uveitis (16.7%). All patients had iris transillumination defects, mostly focal (77.8%). AS-OCT revealed IOL chafing in all the eyes, with peephole sign correlation. More peephole signs occurred with IOL in the sulcus (p-value = 0.08). Conclusion: The study recommends AS-OCT for UGH syndrome confirmation and UBM when IOL-iris chafing is not observed on AS-OCT scans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine long-term efficacy and safety of an extended macular vision intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and visually insignificant cataracts. Design: Retrospective observational case series. Setting: MicroChirurgia Oculare, Italy. Methods: A retrospective case series of patients with dry AMD and visually insignificant cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification and implantation of an extended macular vision IOL designed to optimize image quality up to 10° from the foveal center (EyeMax Mono, Sharpview Ophthalmology, London, UK). Criteria for implantation were visually insignificant cataract (NC1 according to LOCS III classification) with dry age-related macular degeneration. Hypermetropia was targeted in most eyes to provide magnification when corrected with spectacles. Primary outcome measures were changes in corrected distant and secondary outcome measures included near visual acuity (CDVA and CNVA, respectively) between baseline and latest follow-up and safety outcomes. Results: 113 eyes of 86 patients (mean age 70.3± 7.9 years) were included (mean follow-up: 48.3± 25.1 months). Mean CDVA improved by 0.22 logMAR (11 ETDRS letters), from 0.53± 0.4 to 0.31± 0.3 (n=113, p< 0.001). Similarly, mean CNVA improved by 0.08 logMAR (4 ETDRS letters), from 0.45± 0.2 to 0.37± 0.2 (n=77, p< 0.001). Eleven eyes had AMD with extensive atrophy, and their mean CDVA improved by 0.32 logMAR (16 ETDRS letters). Three eyes (2.7%) experienced loss of more than one line in logMAR CDVA and four eyes (5.2%) experienced loss of more than one line in logMAR CNVA. No complications or instances of IOL exchange were reported. Conclusion: Visual improvement in eyes with visually insignificant cataract and AMD who underwent phacoemulsification and were implanted with EyeMax Mono IOL appears to be influenced by the IOL optical design. Vision enhancement in eyes with visually insignificant cataracts underscores the IOL's ability to optimize use of healthy retinal areas. Prospective studies with control groups are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

J Morgan Micheletti,1 Kendrick M Wang,1,2 Khanh Ton,1 Karlie N Bonem1 1Berkeley Eye Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Yale University, New Haven, CT, USACorrespondence: J Morgan Micheletti, Berkeley Eye Center, 1435 Hwy 6, Suite &num;202, Sugar Land, Houston, Texas, 77478, USA, Tel/Fax +1 281-478-9868, Email morgan.micheletti@gmail.comPurpose: To share examination findings of the lens capsule which may act as an indicator for malpositioned intraocular lenses (IOL).Setting: Single large multi-specialty private practice, Houston, Texas, USA.Design: Focused, observational case series.Methods: A review of pre-operative images of malpositioned single-piece IOLs with at least one haptic in the ciliary sulcus was conducted. The review included five cases who were referred to a single large multi-specialty private practice from June 2023 to December 2024 for an evaluation of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and potential Nd:YAG capsulotomy.Findings: A total of five eyes which previously had undergone cataract surgery and were referred for Nd:YAG capsulotomy for PCO were identified on slit lamp examination to have capsular waves, defined as a centripetal and circumferential striated pattern of PCO that results from a fused anterior and posterior capsule with at least part of the IOL anterior to the capsule. While one eye exhibited transillumination defects and pigment dispersion, the remainder of eyes did not. In some cases, the capsular wave was the only clue to IOL malpositioning due to a small pupil. These eyes had single-piece IOLs with at least one haptic in the sulcus and required subsequent IOL repositioning or exchange.Conclusion: If capsular waves are seen on slit lamp exam, a thorough inspection of IOL placement should be conducted, especially before treatment with Nd:YAG capsulotomy. Capsular waves result from anterior and posterior capsule contact with an anteriorly situated IOL. This finding is a potential indicator of at least part of an IOL positioned anterior to the anterior capsule.Keywords: IOL, sulcus, malpositioned IOL, uveitis, glaucoma, hyphema, iris atrophy, transepithelial defect

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of cataract in patients with postkeratotomic corneal ectasia has various features. First, difficulties arise when calculating the optical strength of an intraocular lens and its cylindrical component and determining the location of the main axes of astigmatism for toric intraocular lens implantation. Additionally, not all modern keratotopography installations are able to accurately determine the refractive power of the cornea in such patients owing to pronounced irregular astigmatism and a large difference in keratometric parameters in the main meridians. CLINICAL CASES DESCRIPTION: Two clinical cases of surgical treatment of cataract in combination with postkeratotomic keratectasia are presented. Patients underwent a standard preoperative ophthalmological examination. TMS-4 Tomey keratotopograph was used to accurately determine the refractive power of the cornea. The optical power of toric intraocular lens were calculated using the Holladay 2 formula with amendments for radial keratotomy and the Johnson Johnson VISIC online calculator. SN6AT9 intraocular lens (Alcon) and a Tecnis ZCT800 toric intraocular lens (Johnson Johnson) were implanted in patients. The orientation of the position of the cylinder axis of toric intraocular lens was performed perpendicular to the most flattened meridian, corresponding to the position of the keratectasia zone, determined by the most expanded keratotomy scar. Before surgery, the best corrected visual acuity of patient M was OD=0.2, OS=0.4 and that of patient K was OD=0.4, OS=0.2. After surgery, the best corrected visual acuity of patient M was OD=0.8, OS=0.8 and that of patient K was OD=0.8, OS=0.7. CONCLUSION: This study aimed to familiarize practicing ophthalmologists, clinical residents, and postgraduates with a possible treatment option for cataracts by phacoemulsification with implantation of a toric intraocular lens in patients with postkeratotomic keratectasia. The resulting high visual acuity and subjective satisfaction of patients indicate the accuracy of chosen treatment tactics. A reliable visual guide for choosing the cylinder axis is the meridian of the greatest degree of keratectasia (cornea flattening), which is determined by the maximally expanded keratotomy scar position. The intraocular lens cylinder axis is oriented perpendicular to the keratectasia meridian. Ultrasound phacoemulsification of cataract with implantation of a toric intraocular lens is an effective method for correcting induced ametropia after radial keratotomy against the background of postkeratotomy keratectasia with high astigmatism.

Purpose: This study is to evaluate the optical characteristics of a non-diffractive wavefront-shaping intraocular lens which incorporates surface refractive modifications for shaping the wavefront in order to achieve extended depth of focus (EDoF) and to assess whether the nominal power of this IOL influences the attainable add power. Methods: A commercially available optical bench NIMO TR1504 device (LAMBDA-X, Nivelles, Belgium) was employed to obtain full optical characterization of three non-diffractive EDoF intraocular lenses with + 10 D, + 20 D, and + 30 D powers. After NIMO measurements, data were computed using a custom-made MATLAB program (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) to evaluate the optical quality functions, such as the point spread function (PSF), wavefront profiles, and modulation transfer function (MTF) for two pupil sizes: 3 mm and 4.0 mm. Results: The non-diffractive EDoF intraocular lens showed a central serrated power profile behavior with additions of + 2.00 to + 2.50 D over the nominal power. Higher order aberrations were found to be driven mainly by the spherical aberration, with almost null comatic influence. Optical quality metrics showed good values, better for a 3 mm pupil compared to a 4.5 mm one, as expected. The three IOL powers tested showed a very similar behavior in terms of power and aberrometric profiles, with minimal to null differences related to the nominal power. Conclusion: The non-diffractive wavefront-shaping EDoF intraocular lens achieves a near addition up to + 2.50 D aiming for an extended range of vision, almost independently of the base power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To estimate the pupil size (at the iris plane) under photopic (PPH) and scotopic (PS) conditions after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 190 virgin eyes from 190 patients who underwent cataract surgery with IOL implantation. Data collected with Aladdin (Topcon), AS-OCT MS-39 (CSO), and iTrace (Tracey) were SimK, mean pupillary power at 6 mm (MPP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), lens rise (LR), PPH and PS before and after surgery at 30 days, dysfunctional lens index, and opacity grade. The position of the postoperative iris plane (PIP) was measured manually with MS-39, and a multivariate regression formula was developed to predict it. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) (IBM). Results: The mean and standard deviations were 42.61 ± 3.20 D for MMP at 6 mm, 3.35 ± 0.37 mm for ACD, 3.89 ± 0.18 mm for PIP (P < 0.01), 4.55 ± 0.42 mm for LT, 0.43 ± 0.24 mm for LR, and 25.91 ± 3.03 mm for AL. The mean preoperative and postoperative topographic pupil magnification was 12% and 14.22%, respectively (P < 0.01). Despite an increase in magnification, the postoperative pupil was smaller than the preoperative one both for scotopic and photopic conditions: The larger the preoperative pupil, the more it tends to reduce in the postoperative period. Conclusions: Analysis of the preoperative topographic pupil alone is not sufficient for a correct indication of the optical zone and total diameter of IOL to be implanted but must be correlated with biometric data. The topographic pupil, therefore, undergoes a change in magnification from the preoperative period to the postoperative period. Furthermore, the real pupil presents a modification and, in most cases, tends to be smaller postoperatively in both photopic and scotopic conditions.

Background: The cervical favorability for IOL is assessed by scoring systems. There are various scoring systems, including the Field system, Lange pelvic scoring system, and Bishop scoring system, which was then modified and termed ‘The modified Bishop scoring system, and it is the most widely used one. This scoring is done based on the assessment of the station of the fetal presenting part, consistency, position, dilatation, and length of the maternal cervix. Owing to its subjective assessment, there is a high chance of inter-observer variability. Therefore, radiological methods such as Trans-vaginal ultrasonogram (TVS) and Trans-abdominal ultrasonogram (TAS) are preferred over manual methods. This study aims to determine the role of assessment of the cervix by Modified Bishop Score and assessment of the cervical parameters by Transvaginal ultrasonogram (TVS) and compare them in predicting the outcome of labour. Material and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in a tertiary care hospital located at Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, in a term singleton pregnancy woman, and the Study period was from January 2023 to July 2023 for six months. In total, one hundred fifty pregnant women were recruited. The study inclusion criteria were singleton pregnant women with intact amniotic membranes and a period of gestation >37 weeks with cephalic presentation. The findings of TVS were blinded to the person who measured cervical parameters for the bishop score. IOL done for both favorable and unfavorable cervix according to the guidelines given by FOGSI-ICOG (2018) for IOL. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed the area under the curve (AUC) for the TVS score was 0.705(95 % CI: 0.616–0.794) against the standard bishop score. TVS Score≥6.5 cm is the best cut-off value to ascertain successful IOL with a sensitivity of 99 % and specificity of 94 % among singleton pregnancy women. Conclusion: This prospective observational study deduced that TVS scoring is a valid alternative tool against the standard bishop score in predicting cervical favorability for IOL among singleton pregnant women with plausible sensitivity and specificity. TVS scoring for assessing cervical favorability acts as an outstanding marker in predicting the IOL with a cut-off value of ≥6.5 cm in singleton pregnant women.

Nuno Campos1,2 1Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal; 2Hospital CUF TEJO, Lisboa, PortugalCorrespondence: Nuno Campos, Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, Email nunocampos.dr@gmail.comPurpose: To assess the clinical outcomes, the rate of spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of an enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) LuxSmart™ IOL targeted for mini-monovision in patients who had undergone bilateral cataract surgery.Methods: Twenty patients underwent bilateral LuxSmart IOL implantation with the non-dominant eye targeted for − 0.50 diopters. Best-corrected distance (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 66 cm, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, and defocus curve were assessed. Patient-reported visual function was inquired by Catquest-9SF, and the rate of spectacle independence in all daily-life activities was calculated. The presence of photic phenomena was evaluated. A p-value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The mean IOL power was +21.50 ± 4D (16.5– 26D), and all were non-toric. Thirty-seven (92.5%) eyes were within ± 0.5D of predicted target. The postoperative MRSE was 0.06 ± 0.42D and − 0.45 ± 0.22D in dominant and non-dominant eyes. Every patient achieved distance binocular vision better than 0.1 logMAR. The non-dominant eyes showed lower CDVA (p< 0.001). The UIVA was higher in non-dominant eyes (p< 0.001). Binocular uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.12 ± 0.1, and uncorrected near visual acuity was higher in non-dominant eyes (p< 0.001). LuxSmart IOL provided a sustained visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR or better between +1.00D and − 2.50D. A total of 25% of patients reported frequent halos and glare. Despite achieving higher degrees of satisfaction, seven patients (35%) denied total spectacle independence in their daily-life activities, particularly for activities requiring continuous near vision.Conclusion: This study shows that LuxSmart EDOF IOL in mini-monovision strategy performs well for distance and intermediate vision. Although visual acuity for near also achieved very good results, the considerable rate of spectacle dependence, in particular for near, and the rate of photic phenomena do not support this IOL to be safely implanted in patients desiring spectacle independence at time of cataract surgery.Keywords: cataract, presbyopia, IOL, EDOF, LuxSmart, mini-monovision

Purpose: To compare intra‐ and postoperative results of sutureless scleral fixated Carlevale intraocular lens (IOL) with iris fixated Artisan IOL. Methods: Monocentre, retrospective analysis of refractive outcomes and intra‐ and postoperative complications of patients who received a Carlevale or Artisan IOL between January 2019 and March 2022. Results: 178 eyes of 169 patients were included (101 Carlevale and 77 Artisan IOLs). The standard follow‐up time was 1 month. Two statistically significant differences were found: in the deviation of the postoperative spherical equivalent of the refraction from the preoperative chosen IOL target (p = 0.019; mean deviation was −0.46 in the Carlevale and 0.08 in the Artisan group), and the number of eyes with complications between the Carlevale and Artisan groups (p = 0.003; 33 in the Carlevale and 42 in the Artisan group). Conclusion: The current study is the largest so far comparing both refractive outcomes and complications after implantation of Carlevale and Artisan IOL. The Carlevale IOL does not carry a greater complication risk on the short‐term follow‐up. This provides additional evidence that the Carlevale IOL has to be added to the armamentarium of the ophthalmic surgeon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The presented paper deals with the analysis of a two-stage constant power generation (CPG) interfaced with a grid-tied solar photovoltaic power system (GTSPPS). In earlier days, for extracting the maximum power point in GTSPPS, different types of MPPT controllers were used. These techniques fail whenever a change in solar irradiance takes place. A CPG technique was proposed that makes use of a single stage, but this technique still has a drawback as its operating area always lies to the right of MPPT, so whenever a sudden change in solar irradiance occurs, the robustness of the CPG algorithm decreases. Thus, there is a need for two-stage CPG so as to have a stable, constant power generation. Further, the performance of two-stage CPG has been compared with different control techniques under dynamic as well as steady-state conditions to know its suitability under practical conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Calcification of hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOL) is a rare complication following cataract surgery. Secondary calcification is described as due to host factors or changes in the IOL environment and uveitis, proliferative diabetic retinopathy and sequelae of ocular surgery are recognised potentiators. The impact of systemic connective tissue disease on IOL opacification is yet to described. Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and management of a young patient, with a rare subtype of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, who presented with secondary IOL calcification 14 years after primary IOL insertion. Observations: Floret-like lesions were observed on the IOL surface. Positive staining for calcification was observed with Alizarin red and von Kossa method on laboratory analysis. Conclusions and importance: Patients with systemic connective tissue disease, such as a subtype of Ehlers-Danlos, may present with secondary IOL calcification many years after primary lens insertion. This poses an additional consideration when implanting IOLs in these patients.Good visual acuity can be achieved with IOL exchange.

Modern technologies of examining cataract patients and phacoemulsification with implantation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) commonly allow achieving the desired anatomical outcome and a high functional outcome after surgery. The development of postoperative dysphotopsias in patients with a posterior chamber IOL, however, requires a separate consideration. Dysphotopsia can develop practically in any eye with the IOL after cataract surgery and in some cases can affect postoperative vision, which hinders the patient from resuming working life as usual. Clear systemic guidelines for preventing postoperative dysphotopsia are still to be developed.

This article presents a clinical case of intraocular lens (IOL) removal due to surface degeneration 2 years after implantation. Explantation was performed resulting from clinically significant clouding of the IOL and decreased visual acuity. The microscopic picture and microtopography of the explanted hydrophilic acrylic IOL with hydrophobic coating were studied using scanning electron microscopy. The opacities were total, located on the entire surface of the lens, including the supporting elements.

Abstract Objective The double‐balloon (dB) catheter is commonly used for cervical ripening before induction of labour (IoL), and is the preferred method of cervical ripening when prostaglandin is contraindicated. Manufacturer's instructions contraindicate use beyond 12 h. There is limited published evidence to support this restriction. This study aims to describe the mode of birth and other maternal and neonatal outcomes where dB‐IoL was used beyond the timeframe recommended by the manufacturer. Methods Retrospective observational study of patients undergoing dB‐IoL at a single tertiary unit. Mode of birth, maternal and neonatal birth outcomes were described for those where the balloon was in situ for 12–24 and >24 h, compared to those where the balloon was in situ for 12 and >24 h is not associated with a higher proportion of caesarean birth and does not appear to impose harm on the mother or baby.

Purpose: To report patient satisfaction after unilateral/bilateral extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a young population after vitrectomy. Methods: Patients that underwent phaco-vitrectomy or phaco following vitrectomy with an AT LARA EDOF IOL, aged between 18 and 75 years, were asked to fill out a questionnaire to assess overall visual quality, near vision quality, and visual disturbances. The questionnaire was based on the Catquest, NAVQ, and APPLES questionnaires. Results: A total of 89 participants (average age 56.7 years) filled out the questionnaire of which 53.9% received a unilateral EDOF IOL. The most common indications for vitrectomy were retinal detachments (38.2%), floaters (36.0%), and epiretinal membranes (16.9%). The Catquest and NAVQ score respectively showed a good overall satisfaction (3.44/4.0), a good intermediate vision (3.55/4.0), and an average near vision (2.75/4.0). The APPLES score showed acceptable visual disturbances. There were no differences between the unilateral and bilateral group, except for a higher spectacle dependency in the unilateral group (40% vs. 10.6%). Participants that underwent vitrectomy in case of floaters reported lower satisfaction rates. Other variables, like the pre-operative refraction, had no impact on both satisfaction and visual disturbances. Conclusion: Both unilateral and bilateral implantation of the AT LARA EDOF IOL showed a high satisfaction with no differences between both groups, except for a lower spectacle use in the latter. Hence, The AT LARA seems to be a possible choice in patients undergoing vitrectomy at a younger age, even for unilateral use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern technologies of examining cataract patients and phacoemulsification with implantation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) commonly allow achieving the desired anatomical outcome and a high functional outcome after surgery. The development of postoperative dysphotopsias in patients with a posterior chamber IOL, however, requires a separate consideration. Dysphotopsia can develop practically in any eye with the IOL after cataract surgery and in some cases can affect postoperative vision, which hinders the patient from resuming working life as usual. Clear systemic guidelines for preventing postoperative dysphotopsia are still to be developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmacological agents such as prostaglandins (dinoprostone and misoprostol) are commonly used to reduce the duration of labor and promote vaginal delivery. However, key safety considerations with its use include an increased risk of uterine rupture, tachysystole and hyperstimulation of pregnant women, which could potentially lead to a non-reassuring fetal heart rate and to fetal hypoxemia. The aim of this systematic review was to assess maternal and fetal outcomes between misoprostol group (PGE1) and dinoprostone group (PGE2) We search on MEDLINE (PubMed), CINHAL (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Scopus (Ovid), CENTRAL (January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2022). Patients were eligible if they presented at greater than 36 weeks gestation with an indication for induction of labor and a single live cephalic fetus. We conducted a meta-analysis of data for both primary (cesarean section rate, instrumental deliveries rate, tachysystole, uterine rupture, post-partum haemorrage; chorionamiositis) and secondary outcomes (Apgar at 5 min <7, meconium-stained liquor, NICU admission, infant death) using odds-ratio (OR) as a measure of effect-size. Risk of bias assessment was performed with RoB-I. We performed statistical analyses using Cochrane RevMan version 5.4 software. We found 39 RCTs comparing the outcomes of interest between misoprostol and dinoprostone. The pooled effect showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of cesarean section rate [OR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.84–1.05], instrumental deliveries rate [OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.90–1.19; p = 0.62], tachysystole [OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.91–1.60; p = 0.19], post-partum hemorrhage [OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.62–1.15p = 0.30], chorioamnionitis [OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76–1.17p = 0.59], Apgar at 5 min < 7 [OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.61–1.12, p = 0.21], meconium-stained liquor [OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.97–1.27p = 0.59], NICU admission group [OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.77–1.09], infant death [OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.22–1.44]. After performing a sub-group analysis based on the type of prostaglandins administrations (oral, vaginal gel, vaginal pessary), results did not change substantially. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that misoprostol and dinoprostone appear to have a similar safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Standardization for reporting medical outcomes enables clinical study comparisons and has a fundamental role in research reproducibility. In this context, we present mEYEstro, a free novel standalone application for automated standardized refractive surgery graphs. mEYEstro can be used for single and multiple group comparisons in corneal and intraocular refractive surgery patients. In less than 30 s and with minimal user manipulation, mEYEstro automatically creates the required journal standard graphs while simultaneously performing valid statistical analyses. Results The software produces the following 11 standard graphs; Efficacy: 1. Cumulative uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected visual acuity (CDVA), 2. Difference between UDVA and CDVA, Safety: 3. Change in line of CDVA, Accuracy: 4. Spherical equivalent (SEQ) to intended target, 5. Attempted vs. achieved SEQ, 6. Defocus equivalent (DEQ) accuracy, 7. Refractive astigmatism accuracy, 8. Target-induced astigmatism vs. Surgically-induced astigmatism, 9. Correction index histogram, 10. Angle of error histogram, Stability: 11. SEQ stability over time. Percent proportions, means, standard deviations, Cohen's d effect sizes, and p-values are calculated and displayed on each graph. All graphs can be easily exported as high-resolution TIFF images for figures to use in scientific manuscripts and presentations. Conclusions mEYEstro software enables clinicians, surgeons, and researchers, to easily and efficiently analyze refractive surgery outcomes using the standardized methodology required by several peer-reviewed ophthalmology journals.

Abstract Purpose To compare visual performance and quality of life in patients who received either monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) or an enhanced monofocal IOL in a mini-monovision target approach. Background Monofocal lenses are the most common intraocular IOLs employed during cataract surgery because of their relatively low cost and good performance for distance sight. However, these lenses, generally, do not exonerate patients from spectacle use for near or intermediate tasks. On the other hand, enhanced monofocal IOLs (e.g., Tecnis Eyhance®) feature optical properties providing patients with good intermediate visual outcomes. Satisfactory near visual acuity results, regardless of IOL type, may be achieved through mini-monovision. We assessed visual performance outcomes between these IOLs, in a mini-monovision approach. Methods Retrospective case series of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at our institution with implantation of Alcon SN60WF, J&J Tecnis DCB00 or J&J Tecnis Eyhance® DIB00 with a pre-operative mini-monovision target. The postoperative spherical equivalent was measured by a Nidek® auto-refractometer. Best-uncorrected binocular visual acuity (BUBVA) at far (3 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) distance and binocular contrast sensitivity (100%, 25%, and 5%, all at 1 m) were measured using Snellen and Pelli-Robson charts, respectively. Visual performance in daily life was evaluated with the Cataract VF-14 quality of life survey. Results 71 patients (35 in the monofocal IOL and 37 enhanced IOL group) were enrolled. Patients implanted with enhanced IOL exhibited statistically significant better BUBVA results at 66 cm and 40 cm distances compared to patients in the monofocal group. Additionally, patients in the enhanced IOL group presented a better contrast sensitivity in lower contrast conditions (5%) than patients with monofocal IOL. The quality of life survey showed statistically significant higher scores in daily activities without spectacles for patients with enhanced IOL. Conclusion Enhanced monofocal IOLs, combined with a mini-monovision approach, provided patients with good visual performance at all tested distances, with superiority of enhanced monofocal IOLs at near and intermediate distances.

Background: The aim of this research was to see if a refractive enhanced monofocal IOL (Eyhance IOL, IOL Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA, USA) can provide better intermediate vision in patients undergoing phaco-vitrectomy due to cataract and epiretinal macular membrane (ERM). Methods: A nonrandomized prospective observational comparative study enrolled patients affected by cataract and ERM undergoing phaco-vitrectomy. A follow up of 6 months was established. Corrected and uncorrected visual acuity of both monocular and binocular types were assessed regarding intermediate and far distances. The CATQUEST 9-SF questionnaire was administered preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Results: Twenty-three eyes of twenty-three patients were enrolled, with 11 in the enhanced monofocal group. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity after 6 months was not statistically different. Both monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity after 6 months were higher in the enhanced monofocal group (p < 0.001). The corrected intermediate visual acuity after 6 months was higher in the enhanced monofocal group (p = 0.01). The CATQUEST-9SF questionnaire showed significant differences in the variation between the preoperative condition and six-month postoperative results (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This refractive enhanced monofocal IOL can provide better intermediate vision compared to a standard monofocal IOL in patients undergoing phaco-vitrectomy due to cataracts and ERM. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes and residual astigmatism following implantation of Eyecryl toric versus Alcon AcrySof IQ toric intra-ocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This retrospective, observational study included 143 eyes of 141 patients who underwent phaco-emulsification, followed by implantation of Eyecryl toric IOL (n = 83 eyes) or Alcon toric IOL (n = 60 eyes) in an eye hospital in South India from 2018 to 2021. At 1 month post-op, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), and residual astigmatism of the toric IOL were compared and analyzed. Results: The mean pre-op corneal astigmatism was 2.02 ± 0.81 D and 1.70 ± 0.68 D in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively (P = 0.005). The mean post-op corneal astigmatism at 1 month was 0.50 ± 0.51 D and 0.36 ± 0.42 D in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.87). The mean post-op UCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at 1 month was similar between the groups at 0.17 ± 0.18 and 0.17 ± 0.16 in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively (P = 0.98). The mean post-op BCVA in logMAR at 1 month was 0.06 ± 0.09 and 0.03 ± 0.10 in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Both Eyecryl toric and Alcon AcrySof IQ toric IOLs showed comparable post-operative outcomes in terms of UCVA and residual astigmatism. The post-op BCVA was clinically similar between groups but statistically better in the Eyecryl toric group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions The aims of lens removal surgery are to re‐establish or preserve both a clear visual axis and emmetropic vision. Trans‐scleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation has been described in cases where lens capsule instability precludes the insertion of a prosthetic intraocular lens into the lens capsule. Previous techniques have necessitated enlargement of the corneal incision to accommodate either a rigid polymethylmethacrylate IOL or an acrylic foldable IOL inserted using forceps. This paper reports the modification of an endocapsular IOL to be used as an injectable suture‐fixated IOL introduced through a 2.8 mm corneal incision.All cases underwent lens extraction by phacoemulsification followed by removal of the unstable lens capsule. A PFI X4 IOL (Medicontur) was modified to create four open‐loop haptics. The IOL was injected into the anterior chamber, each haptic was captured in a loop of suture introduced ab externo, and the lens was sutured with four‐point fixation.The results from 20 eyes in 17 dogs are reported. Over an average follow‐up time of 14.5 months, vision was retained in 16/20 eyes. Vision was lost in four eyes due to corneal ulceration and ocular hypertension (1/20), retinal detachment (2/20), and Progressive Retinal Atrophy (1/20).The modified PFI X4 proved suitable for injection and scleral fixation through a 2.8 mm corneal incision, with a success rate comparable to previously published techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyze retrospectively the outcomes of Hoffmann pocket scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty at a tertiary institute by a single corneal surgeon. Methods: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients, aged between 11 and 84 years, had a mean follow-up of 2 ± 2.216 years. Overall, five (11.9%) had congenital and 37 had acquired pathology, 15 were pseudophakic, 23 were aphakic, and four were phakic. The commonest indication was trauma in 19 (45.2%), and 21 had previous multiple surgeries including five retinal procedures. Results: The grafts were clear in 20 (47.6%), they failed in 20, three had acute rejection, three were ectatic, two had infection, one had persistent edema, and one had endophthalmitis. The mean log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity was 1.902 pre-op, 1.802 at the final follow-up, and 0.52 after excluding preexisting retinal pathologies. At the last follow-up, the vision improved in 18 (42.9%), maintained in 6, and worsened in 18, and three needed more than -5.00 D and seven needed more than -3.00 D cylinder correction. Five had glaucoma preoperatively, 10 developed the condition postoperatively, six needed cyclodestructive procedure, and three had valve surgery. Conclusion: Advantages of this surgery are avoidance of additional sections to insert the lens, direct positioning of the lens in the posterior chamber, rotational stability of the lens from four-point fixation, and untouched conjunctiva over the scleral pockets. The fact that 20 had clear grafts and 18 visually improved, though two needed lens removal and one developed retinal detachment postsurgery is encouraging. More cases with longer follow-ups will help understand the technique better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyze retrospectively the outcomes of Hoffmann pocket scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty at a tertiary institute by a single corneal surgeon. Methods: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients, aged between 11 and 84 years, had a mean follow-up of 2 ± 2.216 years. Overall, five (11.9%) had congenital and 37 had acquired pathology, 15 were pseudophakic, 23 were aphakic, and four were phakic. The commonest indication was trauma in 19 (45.2%), and 21 had previous multiple surgeries including five retinal procedures. Results: The grafts were clear in 20 (47.6%), they failed in 20, three had acute rejection, three were ectatic, two had infection, one had persistent edema, and one had endophthalmitis. The mean log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity was 1.902 pre-op, 1.802 at the final follow-up, and 0.52 after excluding preexisting retinal pathologies. At the last follow-up, the vision improved in 18 (42.9%), maintained in 6, and worsened in 18, and three needed more than −5.00 D and seven needed more than −3.00 D cylinder correction. Five had glaucoma preoperatively, 10 developed the condition postoperatively, six needed cyclodestructive procedure, and three had valve surgery. Conclusion: Advantages of this surgery are avoidance of additional sections to insert the lens, direct positioning of the lens in the posterior chamber, rotational stability of the lens from four-point fixation, and untouched conjunctiva over the scleral pockets. The fact that 20 had clear grafts and 18 visually improved, though two needed lens removal and one developed retinal detachment postsurgery is encouraging. More cases with longer follow-ups will help understand the technique better.

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes and residual astigmatism following implantation of Eyecryl toric versus Alcon AcrySof IQ toric intra-ocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This retrospective, observational study included 143 eyes of 141 patients who underwent phaco-emulsification, followed by implantation of Eyecryl toric IOL (n = 83 eyes) or Alcon toric IOL (n = 60 eyes) in an eye hospital in South India from 2018 to 2021. At 1 month post-op, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), and residual astigmatism of the toric IOL were compared and analyzed. Results: The mean pre-op corneal astigmatism was 2.02 ± 0.81 D and 1.70 ± 0.68 D in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively (P = 0.005). The mean post-op corneal astigmatism at 1 month was 0.50 ± 0.51 D and 0.36 ± 0.42 D in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.87). The mean post-op UCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at 1 month was similar between the groups at 0.17 ± 0.18 and 0.17 ± 0.16 in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively (P = 0.98). The mean post-op BCVA in logMAR at 1 month was 0.06 ± 0.09 and 0.03 ± 0.10 in the Alcon and Eyecryl groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Both Eyecryl toric and Alcon AcrySof IQ toric IOLs showed comparable post-operative outcomes in terms of UCVA and residual astigmatism. The post-op BCVA was clinically similar between groups but statistically better in the Eyecryl toric group.

Mariska Ackerman,1 Michael Lawless,2,3 Lewis Levitz,4 Uday Bhatt,4 Joseph A Reich,4 Gerard Sutton,2,3 Timothy V Roberts,2,3 Abi Tenen,4 Amanpreet Kaur,4 Chris Hodge2,3,5,6 1Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 2Vision Eye Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 3Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 4Vision Eye Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 5Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 6Macquarie University, Sydney, AustraliaCorrespondence: Michael Lawless, Vision Eye Institute, Level 3 270 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, Sydney, NSW, 2067, Australia, Tel +61 2 9424 9999, Fax +61 2 9410 3000, Email michael.lawless@vei.com.auPurpose: Trifocal Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) were developed to provide patients with effective near, intermediate and distance vision, thus minimizing spectacle dependency. Residual astigmatism has previously been shown to impact unaided visual acuity across all distances; therefore, to optimise the expected outcomes, consideration of preoperative corneal astigmatism is essential. The purpose of this study was to provide a real-world, multi-site review of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes undergoing implantation with the Panoptix Trifocal toric IOL platform.Patients and Methods: This study represents a two-fold approach. Patients who had previously undergone routine cataract removal and IOL insertion with the Panoptix Toric IOL were retrospectively analysed for routine efficacy and safety endpoints (“Retrospective Cohort”). Data was retrieved from the preoperative, surgical and postoperative visits (range 2– 6 weeks). A further subset of patients undergoing lens removal and bilateral Panoptix Toric IOL insertion were identified at surgery (“Qualitative Cohort”). These patients underwent additional testing inclusive of quality of vision questionnaire and bilateral defocus curve.Results: A total of 466 eyes of 254 patients were included in the retrospective cohort. Between 91% and 98% of eyes, respectively, were within 0.50D and 1.00D of target. Mean absolute difference from Spherical Equivalent (SE) target was 0.22 ± 0.24Ds. Following surgery, 94% of eyes demonstrated a refractive astigmatism of 0.50D or less. Further, 61% eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better, increasing to 94% achieving 20/32 or better. Seventy percent of eyes unilaterally achieved N5 unaided and 66.0% achieved N8 or better at intermediate. In the qualitative cohort, no patient described any symptom as significant or requested explant.Conclusion: In a real-world setting, the PanOptix toric trifocal IOL continues to demonstrate refractive accuracy and good visual performance at all focal distances. This IOL also exhibited good quality of vision, with minimally bothersome visual disturbances or photic phenomena.Keywords: cataract surgery, IOL, trifocal, lens extraction, visual acuity

Abstract Background Quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method is an advanced quick method for contrast sensitivity function (CSF) evaluation. This study evaluated the contrast sensitivity (CS) of eyes undergoing cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and its tolerance to IOL tilt and IOL decentration using the qCSF method. Methods Patients undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification and a trifocal IOL (Zeiss AT LISA tri 839MP, Carl Zeiss, Germany) or an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00, Johnson & Johnsons, USA) implantation were included. Monocular contrast sensitivity was measured using the qCSF method at one month post-surgery. IOL tilt and decentration were measured using an optical aberrometer (OPD-Scan III, NIDEK, Japan). Results Seventy-two patients/eyes with the 839MP IOL and 64 patients/eyes with the ZXR00 IOL were included. Area under the log CSF (AULCSF) and CS acuity did not differ significantly between the two groups. The ZXR00 IOL group showed better CS at 1 cpd (1.137 ± 0.164 vs. 1.030 ± 0.183 logCS) and 1.5 cpd (1.163 ± 0.163 vs. 1.071 ± 0.161 logCS), while the 839MP IOL group had better CS at 6 cpd (0.855 ± 0.187 vs. 0.735 ± 0.363 logCS). In the 839MP IOL group, all CSF metrics were negatively correlated with IOL tilt (all P 0.05). Among myopic eyes, fewer CSF metrics were negatively correlated with IOL tilt in the ZXR00 IOL group than in the 839MP IOL group. No significant correlation was found between CSF metrics and IOL decentration. Conclusions The ZXR00 and the 839MP IOL groups presented comparable CSF. CS was negatively correlated with IOL tilt, instead of decentration in multifocal IOLs, particularly among myopic eyes. The ZXR00 IOL had better tolerance to IOL tilt in myopic eyes.

Phillip J Buckhurst,1 George Lau,2 Jon I Williams,2 Mark Packer3 1School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK; 2Bausch and Lomb Surgical, Bausch and Lomb Bridgewater, New Jersey, NJ, USA; 3Mark Packer Consulting, Boulder, CO, USACorrespondence: Phillip J Buckhurst, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK, Tel +44 1752 588884, Email Phillip.buckhurst@plymouth.ac.ukPurpose: To assess the refractive outcomes, intraocular centration and rotational stability of the enVista toric intraocular lens (IOL).Patients and Methods: This study was a prospective, multi-centre, double-masked, partially randomized and partially controlled clinical trial. A total of 191 participants were implanted with toric IOL (1.25, 2.00, or 2.75D) or non-toric IOL (control). The lowest range of corneal astigmatic eyes were randomized to 1.25D toric or control. Higher astigmatic powers were allocated to the treatment arm. Subjects were assessed immediately postoperatively, 1– 2 (V1), 7– 14 (V2), 30– 60 (V3) and 120– 180 (V4) days postoperatively. Unaided (UDVA) and distance corrected visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction and corneal curvature were assessed. Vector analysis was used to calculate surgically induced refractive correction (SIRC), correction ratio (CR), error magnitude (EM) and error vector (EV). Slit-lamp photography was used to measure centration and rotational stability.Results: UDVA was better in the low toric IOL group in comparison with the control group at V4 (p< 0.001). There was an undercorrection in the control group, whereas the average CR for all toric subjects was 1.00 ± 0.32: V2, 0.98 ± 0.34: V3 and 0.98 ± 0.35: V4. The absolute IOL rotational stability in comparison to the position of the IOL at V1 was 1.35° ± 0.97°: V2, 1.35° ± 1.07°: V3 and 1.38° ± 1.25°: V4. Decentration was generally inferior (V1: 0.04 ± 0.22mm, V2: 0.05± 0.20mm, V3: 0.08 ± 0.22mm, V4: 0.04 ± 0.21mm) and nasal (V1: 0.19 ± 0.23mm, V2: 0.20 ± 0.20mm, V3: 0.20 ± 0.21mm, V4: 0.17 ± 0.22mm).Conclusion: Participants with low levels of corneal astigmatism achieved superior vision and refractive outcomes in the low toric group over the control. Moderate and high levels of astigmatism achieved excellent refractive outcomes. The toric IOL demonstrated high levels of both rotational and centrational stability.Keywords: IOL, astigmatism, cataract, enVista, toric

Purpose: To compare visual performance and quality of life in patients who received either monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) or an enhanced monofocal IOL in a mini-monovision target approach. Background: Monofocal lenses are the most common intraocular IOLs employed during cataract surgery because of their relatively low cost and good performance for distance sight. However, these lenses, generally, do not exonerate patients from spectacle use for near or intermediate tasks. On the other hand, enhanced monofocal IOLs (e.g., Tecnis Eyhance®) feature optical properties providing patients with good intermediate visual outcomes. Satisfactory near visual acuity results, regardless of IOL type, may be achieved through mini-monovision. We assessed visual performance outcomes between these IOLs, in a mini-monovision approach. Methods: Retrospective case series of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at our institution with implantation of Alcon SN60WF, J&J Tecnis DCB00 or J&J Tecnis Eyhance® DIB00 with a pre-operative mini-monovision target. The postoperative spherical equivalent was measured by a Nidek® auto-refractometer. Best-uncorrected binocular visual acuity (BUBVA) at far (3 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) distance and binocular contrast sensitivity (100%, 25%, and 5%, all at 1 m) were measured using Snellen and Pelli-Robson charts, respectively. Visual performance in daily life was evaluated with the Cataract VF-14 quality of life survey. Results: 71 patients (35 in the monofocal IOL and 37 enhanced IOL group) were enrolled. Patients implanted with enhanced IOL exhibited statistically significant better BUBVA results at 66 cm and 40 cm distances compared to patients in the monofocal group. Additionally, patients in the enhanced IOL group presented a better contrast sensitivity in lower contrast conditions (5%) than patients with monofocal IOL. The quality of life survey showed statistically significant higher scores in daily activities without spectacles for patients with enhanced IOL. Conclusion: Enhanced monofocal IOLs, combined with a mini-monovision approach, provided patients with good visual performance at all tested distances, with superiority of enhanced monofocal IOLs at near and intermediate distances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Standardization for reporting medical outcomes enables clinical study comparisons and has a fundamental role in research reproducibility. In this context, we present mEYEstro, a free novel standalone application for automated standardized refractive surgery graphs. mEYEstro can be used for single and multiple group comparisons in corneal and intraocular refractive surgery patients. In less than 30 s and with minimal user manipulation, mEYEstro automatically creates the required journal standard graphs while simultaneously performing valid statistical analyses. Results: The software produces the following 11 standard graphs; Efficacy: 1. Cumulative uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected visual acuity (CDVA), 2. Difference between UDVA and CDVA, Safety: 3. Change in line of CDVA, Accuracy: 4. Spherical equivalent (SEQ) to intended target, 5. Attempted vs. achieved SEQ, 6. Defocus equivalent (DEQ) accuracy, 7. Refractive astigmatism accuracy, 8. Target-induced astigmatism vs. Surgically-induced astigmatism, 9. Correction index histogram, 10. Angle of error histogram, Stability: 11. SEQ stability over time. Percent proportions, means, standard deviations, Cohen's d effect sizes, and p-values are calculated and displayed on each graph. All graphs can be easily exported as high-resolution TIFF images for figures to use in scientific manuscripts and presentations. Conclusions: mEYEstro software enables clinicians, surgeons, and researchers, to easily and efficiently analyze refractive surgery outcomes using the standardized methodology required by several peer-reviewed ophthalmology journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose: To estimatethe power of an implanted intraocular lens (IOL) by measuring IOL thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and to assess the repeatability of measurements. Methods: Ninety-seven eyes were studied one month after uneventful phacoemulsification within the bag Acrysof SA60AT IOL implantation (range +11 to +35). All eyes had postoperative refraction of ± 0.5 D of target refraction. AS-OCT was used to measure the central thickness of the IOL. Correlation between labelled IOL power and central IOL thickness as well as the measure of repeatability, for example, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), were evaluated. IOL thicknesses were also calculated using a formula and compared with AS-OCT derived measurements. Results: IOL thickness correlated significantly with labelled IOL power (R2 = 0.985, P < 0.001). The regression equation (IOL Power = [0.04 × IOL thickness in micron] – 7.56) indicates 25 microns of central IOL thickness change per 1D power change. Over the studied range, IOL power could be estimated with a precision of 0.85 ± 0.02 D (95% confidence interval: 0.83–0.94D). ICC for repeated measurements was 0.999. There was a significant correlation between calculated and measured (AS-OCT) IOL thickness (R2 = 0.984, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Central IOL thickness measurements with the AS-OCT are highly repeatable and closely correlated with the labelled IOL power, which can predict the IOL power with ± 0.85 D from the actual power. This method can be helpful in cases of postoperative IOL surprise.

Olav Kristianslund,1,2 Safia Esmail Hassaf,1 Liv Drolsum1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 2Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence: Olav Kristianslund, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Mailbox 4956, Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway, Tel +47 22 11 85 45, Email olav.kristianslund@medisin.uio.noObjective: In eyes with severe corneal pathology, biometric measurements of the corneal curvature (K) can be challenging. The aims of this study were to test whether K mean values from the fellow eye can be used as substitute in lens power calculations and to determine if similarity in axial length (AL) in a patient’s two eyes implies similarity also in the corneal curvature.Methods and Analysis: A retrospective study of optical biometry measurements in 500 adults (1000 phakic eyes) that was scheduled for cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were complete recordings of all parameters in both eyes and a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 10. Similar AL was defined as less than 0.3 mm difference between the patient’s two eyes.Results: The IOL power calculated with K mean from the fellow eye was 0.39 D (standard deviation (SD) 0.57) different from the calculation with both AL and K mean from the correct eye. The difference was larger than 1.0 D in 26 (5%) eyes. In patients with similar AL in their two eyes (n = 372), the interocular difference in K mean was 0.43 D (SD 0.67 D), compared to 0.45 D (SD 0.49 D) for the patients with an AL difference of 0.3 mm or more (n = 128) (p = 0.81).Conclusion: Lens calculations with keratometry values from the fellow eye as substitute yielded quite similar results as calculations with the correct values. Hence, this seems to be an acceptable approach in patients with incomplete keratometry recordings. Similarity in AL between a person’s two eyes did not imply more similar corneal curvatures.Keywords: optical biometry, cataract surgery, axial length, corneal curvature, intraocular lens, IOL, IOL power calculation

Introduction: This study aimed to compare modified knotless transscleral suture fixation of intraocular lens (IOL) with traditional transscleral suture fixation for adolescents and young patients with congenital ectopia lentis (CEL). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 49 patients with CEL (60 eyes) who underwent surgery at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. Improvements based on knotless Z-suture fixation technique were made to form a modified knotless method, in which thicker 8–0 polypropylene sutures were used, and double parallel scleral grooves were constructed behind the limbus instead of triangular lamellar scleral flaps to cover suture stitches. Modified knotless transscleral fixation of IOL was conducted on 30 eyes, and the other 30 eyes underwent traditional transscleral fixation surgery. Pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, astigmatism, other ocular parameters, and complications were statistically analyzed. Results: For patients in the modified knotless group, the mean cylindrical refractive error and astigmatism at 1 month and 3 months postoperative were lower (all P < 0.05), and the mean IOL tilt degree was smaller at 3 months postoperative (3.21° ± 2.13° vs. 5.65° ± 3.66°, P = 0.032). The incidence of suture exposure in the modified knotless group was also lower than in the controls (0 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.026). No group differences were observed in mean BCVA, spherical equivalent, or other ocular biometric parameters between groups. Conclusion: Modified knotless technique was a valid method to achieve optimal IOL position and reduce postoperative astigmatism for adolescents and young patients with CEL. It effectively reduced the incidence of knot-related complications, greatly improved the postoperative comfort, and achieved aesthetic benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]