Search

Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a lethal complication of myocardial infarction. Case presentation: A 67-year-old male who presented with a history of chest pain associated with shock... Physical examination was significant for crepitation in lower lung fields. Echo showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30-35% and muscular ventricular septal defects with left to right shunting and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure. In a short time, he developed respiratory failure during the hospital course. Our patient had VSD due to acute myocardial infarction (MI). The patient was transferred to another hospital on a ventilator for surgical intervention but died before any procedure. Conclusion: Our case highlights an unfortunate patient with a VSD secondary to myocardial infarction (MI) resulting in Death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a lethal complication of myocardial infarction. Case presentation: A 67-year-old male who presented with a history of chest pain associated with shock... Physical examination was significant for crepitation in lower lung fields. Echo showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30-35% and muscular ventricular septal defects with left to right shunting and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure. In a short time, he developed respiratory failure during the hospital course. Our patient had VSD due to acute myocardial infarction (MI). The patient was transferred to another hospital on a ventilator for surgical intervention but died before any procedure. Conclusion: Our case highlights an unfortunate patient with a VSD secondary to myocardial infarction (MI) resulting in Death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. Comparative analysis of two groups of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in age subgroups 60-74 years (elderly patients) and 75 years and older (senile patients); comparison of the coronary angiography (CAG) performance rate with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) consideration and time to intervention; evaluation of comorbidities associated with PCI non-performance in clinical practice in the selected subgroups of patients.Material and methods. The study included 580 patients aged 60 years and older (60-74 years (elderly patient group) and 75 years and older (senile patient group)), hospitalized at the regional vascular center of City Clinical Hospital in Moscow during the period from January 01, 2021 to December 31, 2022 with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. The decision to perform CAG with possible PCI was made by hospital physicians in the routine order of daily clinical practice. Statistical analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel 19.Results. In the group of senile patients, there was a comparatively higher percentage of women, patients with a final diagnosis of myocardial infarction, prevalence of anemia, chronic and Killip class ≥II acute heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease. CAG/PCI was performed in the elderly patient group in 91,5% of cases, which was more frequent compared to the senile patient group, where the intervention was performed in 85% of cases (p=0,015). Mostly, CAG/PCI in both groups was performed within the first day of hospital admission. Anemia was significantly more common in patients aged 60-74 years in the conservative strategy groups, and aortic stenosis was more common in those aged 75 years and older. In any age group with non-performance of CAG/PCI, a significant frequency of in-hospital mortality was observed.Conclusion. Patients with NSTE-ACS of elderly and senile age included in the study predominantly underwent invasive treatment within the first day of hospitalization. The elderly and senile age patient groups differed in the prevalence of revascularization, comorbidities and in-hospital outcomes, and did not differ in the time and treatment strategy. The subgroups with interventional treatment more often had a favorable in-hospital outcome.

Invasive plant species severely threaten natural plant communities around the world, especially for islands. As introduction rates rise, novel species interactions appear within ecosystems. Studies that focus on invasive plant impacts on native plants, especially on native communities, remain rare and their conclusions are mixed. We constructed ten quantitative plant-pollinator interaction networks and calculated five network-level structure metrics (interaction evenness, linkage density, specialization, weighted connectance, and weighted nestedness) along an Asteraceae invasion gradient in the Yongxing Island community. We calculated the species-level nestedness contribution of each plant species in each network, and compared the nestedness contribution differences between invasive Asteraceae and non-Asteraceae species. Stigmas of three native and four invasive Asteraceae species were collected, and their pollen grains were identified. We analyzed invasive Asteraceae species impacts on native pollination network structure and the pollen deposition of native plants. Both weighted nestedness and weighted connectance increased significantly as invasive Asteraceae became increasingly dominant. Invasive Asteraceae plants had higher nestedness contribution compared to native plants in most sites, and this difference increased as the Asteraceae proportion increased. Furthermore, in native plant species, the proportion of conspecific pollen grains on stigmas decreased significantly, while the proportion of Asteraceae pollen grains on stigmas increased significantly as Asteraceae invasion level increased. For the four Asteraceae species, the proportion of conspecific pollen grains was significantly higher than heterospecific and other Asteraceae pollen grains on the stigmas. These results significantly add to our understanding of how the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks changes concomitantly with plant invasion intensity. Invasive Asteraceae increase community stability and persistence, and increase the heterospecific pollen deposition on stigmas of native plants as invasion level increases. Invasive plants may greatly shape network structure and maintain community stability in oceanic island systems. Heterospecific pollen avoidance may be crucial mechanism facilitating Asteraceae invasion success within native communities, together with their 'integration', into plant-pollinator interactions on the Yongxing Island. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to its proven efficacy in preventing intra-procedural and post-procedural stent thrombosis in P2Y SB 12 sb receptor inhibitor-naïve patients, cangrelor may be considered on a case-by-case basis in P2Y SB 12 sb receptor inhibitor-naïve ACS patients undergoing PCI, including in patients for whom it may not be feasible to give oral drugs in the setting of emergent PCI (e.g. CS patients and/or patients on mechanical ventilation). Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures Understanding and measuring patient expectations and health outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) is central to improving patient satisfaction and delivering patient-centred care.[895] The quality of care for ACS patients should be measured during the patient's journey from initial presentation until discharge. Contemporary CMR data report LV thrombi in up to 6.3% of all STEMI patients and in 12.2% of those with anterior STEMI, suggesting that the incidence of LV thrombi may be underestimated with echocardiography.[577] Patients with LV thrombi that were not evident on echocardiography but were detected by CMR appear to have similar clinical outcomes to patients with LV thrombi that were evident on echocardiography.[578] Therefore, CMR should be considered in patients with equivocal echocardiographic images or in patients considered to be at a particularly high risk of LV thrombus. [Extracted from the article]

This registry assessed the impact of conservative and invasive strategies on major adverse clinical events (MACE) in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI were prospectively registered from European centers and followed up for one year. Outcomes were compared between conservative and invasive groups in the overall population and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort. MACE included cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke. The study included 1190 patients (median age 80 years, 43% female). CAG was performed in 67% (N = 798), with two-thirds undergoing revascularization. Conservatively treated patients had higher baseline risk. After propensity score matching, 319 patient pairs were successfully matched. MACE occurred more frequently in the conservative group (total population 20% vs. 12%, adjHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.77, p = 0.001), remaining significant in the PSM cohort (18% vs. 12%, adjHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.81, p = 0.004). In conclusion, an early invasive strategy was associated with benefits over conservative management in elderly patients with NSTEMI. Risk factors associated with ischemia and bleeding should guide strategy selection rather than solely relying on age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundResults from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses comparing invasive and conservative strategies in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are highly debatable. We systematically evaluate the efficacy of invasive and conservative strategies in NSTE-ACS based on time-varied outcomes.MethodsThe RCTs for the invasive versus conservative strategies were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial data for studies with a minimum follow-up time of 30 days were included. We categorized the follow-up time into six varied periods, namely, ≤6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years, and ≥10 years. The time-varied outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), rehospitalization, cardiovascular death, bleeding, in-hospital death, and in-hospital bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were calculated. The random effects model was used.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 30 articles of 17 RCTs involving 12,331 participants. We found that the invasive strategy did not provide appreciable benefits for NSTE-ACS in terms of MACE, death, and cardiovascular death at all time points compared with the conservative strategy. Although the risk of MI was reduced within 6 months (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68–0.94) for the invasive strategy, no significant differences were observed in other periods. The invasive strategy reduced the rehospitalization rate within 6 months (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52–0.90), 1 year (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.86), and 2 years (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60–1.00). Of note, an increased risk of bleeding (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.28–2.54) and in-hospital bleeding (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.52–3.10) was observed for the invasive strategy within 6 months. In subgroups stratified by high-risk features, the invasive strategy decreased MACE for patients aged ≥65 years within 6 months (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.78) and 1 year (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.91) and showed benefits for men within 6 months (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.92). In other subgroups stratified according to diabetes, ST-segment deviation, and troponin levels, no significant differences were observed between the two strategies.ConclusionsAn invasive strategy is superior to a conservative strategy in reducing early events for MI and rehospitalizations, but the invasive strategy did not improve the prognosis in long-term outcomes for patients with NSTE-ACS.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289579, identifier PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021289579.

Current guidelines suggest that an early invasive strategy should be considered for the treatment of non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common among NSTEMI patients, these patients are under-represented in clinical trials, and data regarding their management are limited. The authors sought to evaluate the association between early invasive strategy and long-term survival among patients with NSTEMI and CKD. This was a retrospective analysis of 7,107 consecutive NSTEMI patients between 2008 and 2021. Patients were dichotomized into early (≤24 hours) and delayed invasive groups and stratified by kidney function. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The final study population comprised 3,529 invasively treated patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR: 58-74 years), 1,837 (52%) of whom were treated early. There were 483 (14%) patients with at least moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2). During a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR: 2-6 years), 527 (15%) patients died. After inverse probability treatment weighting, an early invasive strategy was associated with a significant 30% lower mortality compared with a delayed strategy (HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.56-0.85). The association between early invasive strategy and mortality was modified by eGFR (P interaction < 0.001) and declined with lower renal function, with no difference in mortality among patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.64-1.24). Among NSTEMI patients, the association of early invasive strategy with long-term survival is modified by CKD and was not observed in patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Objectives: Invasive management in frail patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains controversial. We investigated the impact of various geriatric conditions., Methods: The MOSCA-FRAIL trial included 167 adults aged ≥ 70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] ≥ 4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomized to either an invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy. In addition to frailty, we measured activities of daily living (Barthel index), cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test), and comorbidities (Charlson index). The primary endpoint was the difference (invasive minus conservative) in restricted mean survival time (RMST) for all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 3.9 years., Results: A total of 93 patients died. The RMST difference favored invasive management at the CFS 25th percentile (CFS=4; 157 days, 95%CI, 18-295; P=.027), which changed to a nonsignificant effect at the 50th and 75th percentiles. The RMST difference remained nonsignificant, irrespective of the severity of other geriatric assessments. In time-to-event analysis, invasive management was associated with an initially lower life expectancy, peaking at around 1 year, among all subgroups. However, patients with CFS=4 experienced a benefit at the end of follow-up (181 days, 95%CI, 19-343), whereas those with CFS >4 did not (-16 days, 95%CI, -217 to 186; interaction P=.16). Subgroups defined by other geriatric markers showed a similar time-dependent trend, albeit with weaker statistical interaction., Conclusions: Among adults with frailty and NSTEMI, the CFS might be useful for evaluating the relative risks and benefits of invasive management. A CFS >4 could serve as a valuable threshold for decision-making., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

ABSTRACT The primary endpoint of the ISCHEMIA trial, whose results were presented at the American Heart Association congress back in 2019, was to determine whether an initial invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization and successful revascularization plus optimal medical treatment would reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary syndrome compared to an initial conservative strategy of optimal medical treatment. Out of 5179 patients, 2588 were randomized to receive an invasive strategy and 2591 to receive conservative strategy. At the 4-year follow-up, the primary endpoint showed no significant differences between both groups revolutionizing mass media. In our opinion, we should be cautious when interpreting the results of a study that has not been published yet. There is no doubt, however, that the ISCHEMIA trial deals with an important matter, that the most powerful medical treatment was able to modify the natural history of this disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparotomy has been the traditional approach for the treatment of adult intussusception. The aim of the present study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery to those of open surgery in adult patients with intussusception.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of all adult patients with intussusception admitted to our hospital between 2007 and 2017. The patients' characteristics, presentation, operation details, postoperative outcomes and pathology were analyzed. Comparisons were made between the laparoscopic and open surgery procedures performed during the study period.Results: Seventeen open and 20 laparoscopic-assisted resections were performed. No significant differences were found between the two groups for the following parameters: age (45.3 ± 16.8 vs. 54.9 ± 19.1, p = 0.160); gender (41 vs. 60% males, p = 0.330); American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.609); history of cardiovascular disease (5.9% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.950), COPD/asthma (0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.950), diabetes (11.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.950), and renal impairment (5.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.486); body mass index (20.6 vs. 21.9, p = 0.433); timing of presentation (p = 1.000); type of intussusception (p = 0.658); type of procedures (p = 0.446); operative time (173.7 ± 45.4 vs. 191.5 ± 43.9, p = 0.329); and length of postoperative stay (6.7 ± 5.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.1 days, p = 0.153). However, the open surgery group had fewer patients with hypertension (17.6% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.009) and demonstrated a delayed oral intake (4.0 ± 1.7 days vs. 2.5 ± 0.7 days, p = 0.010) and a higher comprehensive complication index (11.5 ± 27.1 vs. 0, p = 0.038).Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach was associated with earlier oral intake and a lower comprehensive complication index. It is a safe and feasible technique that confers the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It can be considered the preferred surgical option when the surgical expertise is available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with cancer face a high short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism. One of the most fatal manifestations of arterial thromboembolism is myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with cancer face a 3-fold greater risk of MI than patients without cancer. The individual risk for arterial thrombotic events in patients with cancer is determined by the complex interaction of baseline cardiovascular risk factors, cancer type and stage, chemotherapeutic regimen, and other general contributing factors for thrombosis. Managing MI in patients with cancer is a clinical challenge, particularly due to cancer's unique pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in this specific patient population. When patients with cancer present with MI, a limited proportion are treated with guideline-recommended therapy, such as antiplatelet therapy or invasive revascularization. Despite the limited evidence, existing reports consistently suggest similar clinical benefits of guideline-recommended therapy when administered to patients with cancer presenting with MI. In this review, we briefly summarize the available evidence, clinical challenges, and future perspectives on simultaneous management of MI and cancer, with a focus on invasive strategy.

The benefits of myocardial revascularization in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome after 12 to 24 hours from symptom onset remain a topic of debate, especially in patients who are stable and asymptomatic. We analyzed the benefit of late revascularization by primary coronary intervention in patients admitted to Moroccan cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after 12 hours of symptom onset. We included a total of 406 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 262 patients in the invasive strategy group and 144 patients in the conservative strategy group. A total of 74.6% were men, and 25.4% were women. For the primary outcome, 46 all-cause deaths were observed at 1 year, with 33 patients in the conservative strategy arm and 13 patients in the invasive strategy group, with a significant difference between the 2 groups (p <0.001). For secondary outcomes, there was no difference in readmission for acute coronary syndrome or acute heart failure between the 2 groups (p = 0.277, p = 0.205). For in-CICU cardiogenic shock and ejection fraction <35% at discharge, more events are observed in the conservative strategy, with a significant difference for both (p <0.001). In multivariable analysis, 1-year all-cause mortality was independently associated with revascularization between 12 and 48 hours (hazard ratio [HR] 0.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.182 to 0.762, p = 0.007), ejection fraction <35% at discharge (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.54, p = 0.04), and cardiogenic shock in-CICU (HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.82 to 3.78, p = 0.005).Although no evidence exists to date on the true benefit of late primary coronary intervention revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, this practice remains common, as indicated by the results of most registries., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

International guidelines recommend that for NSTEMI, the timing of invasive strategy (IS) is a function of patient's baseline risk. The extent to which this is delivered across and within healthcare systems is unknown. Data were derived from 137,265 patients admitted with an NSTEMI diagnosis between 2010 and 2015 in England and Wales. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate and high-risk in keeping with international guidelines. Time to IS was categorised into early (24 h), intermediate (25–72 h) and late (>72 h). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of guidelines recommended receipt of IS. There were 3608 (2.6%) low, 5037 (3.7%) intermediate and 128,621 (93.7%) high-risk patients. Guidelines recommended use of IS was significantly lower in high-risk (16.4%) compared to intermediate (64.7%) and low-risk (62.5%) groups. Both men and women in the low-risk category were almost twice as likely to receive early IS compared to high-risk men (28.9% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and women (26.9% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Women (OR 0.91 95%CI 0.88–0.94), troponin elevation (OR 0.39 95%CI 0.36–0.43) and acute heart failure on admission (OR 0.65 95%CI 0.61–0.70) were strong negative predictors of receiving IS within recommended time in the high-risk group. Our study shows that IS for management of NSTEMI is not delivered according to international guidelines recommendations. Specifically, the disconnect between baseline risk and utility of IS increases with increasing risk and women achieve slower access than men to IS. Summary of main findings of the study. Unlabelled Image • Invasive strategy in the management of patients admitted with NSTEMI is guided by their baseline risk. • Based on risk criteria of two international guidelines, over 90% of patients admitted with diagnosis of NSTEMI are high-risk. • Only one in ten of these high-risk patients received invasive strategy within the recommended time. • Paradoxically, both men and women with low-risk are twice as likely to receive early invasive strategy compared to high-risk men and women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal management of elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is still discussed. We aimed to study short- and long-term survival in NSTEMI patients ≥75 years managed with an invasive or a conservative strategy. Methods: NSTEMI patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital Ulleval during 2005–2011 were included consecutively in a prospective registry. Vital status until December 31, 2013, was obtained from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Patients ≥75 years were identified, and 30-day and 7-year survival were analyzed. Logistic- and Cox regression was used to estimate OR and hazard ratio (HR) for death in the invasive versus conservative group, adjusting for registered confounders. Results: There were 2,064 NSTEMI patients ≥75 years (48.2% women); 1,200 (58.1%) were treated with an invasive strategy, and were younger, more likely to be male and previously revascularized compared to 864 (41.9%) patients treated conservatively (p < 0.0001 for all). Survival at 30-day was 94.9% in the invasive and 76.6% in the conservative group. For 30-day survivors, 7-year survival was 47.4% (95% CI 42.9–51.8) and 11.6% (95% CI 8.3–15.6), respectively. After multivariate adjustment, an invasive strategy was associated with lower long-term risk (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.49 [95% CI 0.41–0.59]). Actual revascularization was associated with lower risk of long-term mortality compared to angiography only (aHRPCI 0.73 [95% CI 0.59–0.90], aHRCABG 0.43 [95% CI 0.28–0.65]). Conclusion: In this real-life cohort of NSTEMI patients ≥75 years, 30-day survival was 95%, and 7-year survival was 47% with an invasive strategy. Revascularized patients had a superior long-term prognosis. With a conservative strategy, short- and long-term survival was lower, probably due to selection bias and unmeasured confounding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a delayed versus an immediate invasive approach on final infarct size and clinical outcome up to 1 year. Up to 24% of patients with acute coronary syndromes present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but show complete resolution of ST-segment elevation and symptoms before revascularization. Current guidelines do not clearly state whether these patients with transient STEMI should be treated with a STEMI-like or non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome–like intervention strategy. In this multicenter trial, 142 patients with transient STEMI were randomized 1:1 to either delayed or immediate coronary intervention. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 4 days and at 4-month follow-up to assess infarct size and myocardial function. Clinical follow-up was performed at 4 and 12 months. In the delayed (22.7 h) and the immediate (0.4 h) invasive groups, final infarct size as a percentage of the left ventricle was very small (0.4% [interquartile range: 0.0% to 2.5%] vs. 0.4% [interquartile range: 0.0% to 3.5%]; p = 0.79), and left ventricular function was good (mean ejection fraction 59.3 ± 6.5% vs. 59.9 ± 5.4%; p = 0.63). In addition, the overall occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of death, recurrent infarction, and target lesion revascularization, up to 1 year was low and not different between both groups (5.7% vs. 4.4%, respectively; p = 1.00). At follow-up, patients with transient STEMI have limited infarction and well-preserved myocardial function in general, and delayed or immediate revascularization has no effect on functional outcome and clinical events up to 1 year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate whether the very elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) will benefit from an invasive strategy versus a conservative strategy. Methods 190 consecutive patients aged 80 years or older with NSTEMI were included in the retrospective study from September 2014 to August 2017, of which 69 patients received conservative strategy and 121 patients received invasive strategy. The primary outcome was death. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the statistical association between strategies and mortality. The survival probability was further analyzed. Results The primary outcome occurred in 17.4% patients in the invasive group and in 42.0% patients in the conservative group (P = 0.0002). The readmission rate in the invasive group (14.9%) was higher than that in the conservative group (7.2%). Creatinine level (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.10-1.03, P = 0.05) and use of diuretic (OR = 3.65, 95% CI: 1.56-8.53, P = 0.003) were independent influential factors for invasive strategy. HRs for multivariate Cox regression models were 3.45 (95% CI: 1.77-6.75, P = 0.0003), 3.02 (95% CI: 1.52-6.01, P = 0.0017), 2.93 (95% CI: 1. 46-5.86, P = 0.0024) and 2.47 (95% CI: 1.20-5.07, P = 0.0137). Compared with the patients received invasive strategy, the conservative group had remarkably reduced survival probability with time since treatment (P < 0.001). Conclusions An invasive strategy is superior to a conservative strategy in reducing mortality of patients aged 80 years or older with NSTEMI. Our results suggest that an invasive strategy is more suitable for the very elderly patients with NSTEMI in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To analyze trends in utilization of anti-thrombotic agents (ATA) and in-hospital clinical outcomes in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients managed with an invasive strategy from 2007 to 2010. Methods & results: Using ACTION Registry®-GWTG™ data, we analyzed trends in use of ATA and in-hospital clinical outcomes among 64,199 NSTEMI patients managed invasively between 2007 and 2010. ATA included unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) and bivalirudin. Although the proportion of NSTEMI patients treated with PCI within 48 h of hospital arrival was similar in 2007 and 2010, percentage use of bivalirudin (13.4–27.3%; p

Introduction: Non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is responsible for 2 to 2.5 million deaths worldwide. The percutaneous coronary intervention is related to better evolution in patients of moderate and high risk; however, there are still doubts about the optimal time to carry out the procedure. Objectives: To identify the optimal time for the coronary angiography and percuta neous coronary intervention in patients with NSTE-ACS of moderate-high risk. Method: An observational, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted with 74 patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS at the «Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular», from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. Results: A total of 74 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 69.7±9.56 and a predominance of males (55.4%). There were no discrepancies between the risk factors in each group (p>0.05). The TIMI average was 4.8. Most of patients presented two-vessel disease. The infarct-related artery was mostly the left anterior descending artery. Major events occurred in 8 patients (10.8%), the largest number was observed in the late intervention group. The most frequent minor event was angina, (7 patients), most frequently in the late intervention group. The group with the lowest probability of survival was that of late treatment. Conclusions: The patients in the intermediate intervention group (between 12 and 24 hours, group B) showed the greatest benefits of the coronary angiography and reperfusion strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fear of complications related to the procedure and unclear benefits in elderly patients are common reasons for invasive angiography being withheld.Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase from inception until February 2016 for studies that enrolled individuals older than 75 years with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and allocated patients to either an invasive or conservative strategy.Results: Thirteen studies (four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and nine observational studies) enrolling 832,007 elderly NSTE-ACS patients were analysed. Compared with the conservative treatment, the early invasive approach does significantly reduce the risk of death at follow-up from 6 months to 5 years (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.73, p<0.001); the definite benefit was mainly observed in observational studies (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.70, p<0.001), and the risk of death also showed a strong trend toward reduction with invasive approach (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64-1.05, p=0.119) in RCTs. For the outcome of bleeding complications, there was a higher risk of any bleeding occurring in-hospital (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.53-4.11, p<0.001) in patients treated with invasive strategy than those treated with conservative strategy. However, no difference of in-hospital major bleeding (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.31-10.13, p=0.514) was observed between the two strategies.Conclusion: Elderly patients with NSTE-ACS might benefit from an early invasive strategy but with increasing risk of any bleeding complications. More RCTs are needed to assess early invasive strategies in the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In cardiology, it is controversial whether different therapy strategies influence prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. We examined and compared the long-term outcomes of invasive and conservative strategies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and characterized the patients selected for an invasive approach. Methods: A total of 976 patients with acute NSTEMI were collected from December 2006 to October 2012 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Hospital. They are divided into conservative strategy (586 patients) and invasive strategy (390 patients) group. Unified follow-up questionnaire was performed by telephone contact (cut-off date was November, 2013). The long-term clinical events were analyzed and related to the different treatment strategies. Results: The median follow-up time was 29 months. Mortality was 28.7% (n = 168) in the conservative group and 2.1% (n = 8) in the invasive management at long-term clinical follow-up. The secondary endpoint (the composite endpoint) was 59.0% (n = 346) in the conservative group and 30.3% (n = 118) in the invasive management. Multivariate analysis showed that patients in the conservative group had higher all-cause mortality rates than those who had the invasive management (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 7.795; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.796-16.006, P < 0.001), and the similar result was also seen in the secondary endpoint (adjusted RR = 2.102; 95% CI: 1.694-2.610, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis according to each Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score (TRS), log-rank analysis showed lower mortality and secondary endpoint rates in the invasive group with the intermediate and high-risk patients (TRS 3-7). Conclusions: An invasive strategy could improve long-term outcomes for NSTEMI patients, especially for intermediate and high-risk ones (TRS 3-7).

Invasive coronary revascularization has been shown to improve prognoses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), but the optimal timing of intervention remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to evaluate the outcomes in immediate (

OBJECTIVE:The goal of the present study was to compare the prognoses of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes who were treated with invasive or conservative treatment strategies.METHODS:We performed a meta-analysis of studies of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes to assess the benefits of an invasive strategy vs. a conservative strategy for short- and long-term survival. We searched PubMed for studies published from 1990 to November 2012 that investigated the effects of an invasive vs. conservative strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. The following search terms were used: “non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction”, “unstable angina”, “acute coronary syndromes”, “invasive strategy”, and “conservative strategy”. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year.RESULTS:Seven published studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled analyses show that an invasive strategy decreased the risk of death (risk ratio [0.839] [95% confidence interval {0.648-1.086}; I2, 86.46%] compared to a conservative strategy over a 30-day-period. Furthermore, invasive treatment also decreased patient mortality (risk ratio [0.276] [95% confidence interval {0.259-0.294}; I2, 94.58%]) compared to a conservative strategy for one year.CONCLUSION:In non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, an invasive strategy is comparable to a conservative strategy for decreasing short- and long-term mortality rates.

Objectives The study sought to characterize patient- and hospital-level variation in early angiography use among non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Background Contemporary implementation of guideline recommendations for early angiography use in NSTEMI patients in the United States have not been described. Methods The study analyzed NSTEMI patients included in ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) registry (2012 to 2014) who underwent in-hospital angiography. Timing of angiography was categorized as early (≤24 h) vs. delayed (>24 h). The study evaluated factors associated with early angiography, hospital-level variation in early angiography use, and the relationship with quality-of-care measures. Results A total of 79,760 of 138,688 (57.5%) patients underwent early angiography. Factors most strongly associated with delayed angiography included weekend or holiday presentation, lower initial troponin ratio values, higher initial creatinine values, heart failure on presentation, and older age. Median hospital-level use of early angiography was 58.5% with wide variation across hospitals (21.7% to 100.0%). Patient characteristics did not differ substantially across hospitals grouped by tertiles of early angiography use (low, middle, and high). Hospitals in the highest tertile tended to more commonly use guideline-recommended medications and had higher defect-free care quality scores. Conclusions In contemporary U.S. practice, high-risk clinical characteristics were associated with lower use of early angiography in NSTEMI patients; hospital-level use of early angiography varied widely despite few differences in case mix. Hospitals that most commonly utilized early angiography also had higher quality-of-care metrics, highlighting the need for improved NSTEMI guideline adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Invasive coronary revascularization has been shown to improve prognoses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), but the optimal timing of intervention remains unclear. This meta-analysis is to evaluate the outcomes in immediate (<2 h), early (<24 h), and delayed invasive group and find out which is the optimal timing of intervention in NSTE-ACS patients. Studies were identified through electronic literature search of Medline, PubMed Central, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Data were extracted for populations, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. All-cause mortality was the pre-specified primary end point. The longest follow-up available in each study was chosen. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was the effect measure. The fixed or random effect pooled measure was selected based on the heterogeneity test among studies. In the comparison between early and delayed intervention, we found that early intervention led to a statistical significant decrease in mortality rate (n = 6,624; OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-0.99) and refractory ischemia (n = 6,127; OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.62) and a non-significant decrease in myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding and revascularization. In the analysis comparing immediate and delayed invasive approach, we found that immediate intervention significantly reduced major bleeding (n = 1,217; OR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23-0.93) but led to a non-significant decrease in mortality rate, refractory ischemia and revascularization and a non-significant increase in MI. In conclusion, early invasive strategy may lead to a lower mortality rate and reduce the risk of refractory ischemia, while immediate invasive therapy shows a benefit in reducing the risk of major bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obturator hernia (OH), a rare cause of acute small bowel obstruction, requires immediate surgical intervention to prevent serious complications and mortality. We assessed the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with incarcerated OH presenting with acute abdomen in an emergency setting.Methods: Data pertaining to patients diagnosed with incarcerated OH between 2011 and April 2015 at our hospital were reviewed. Patients' characteristics, operation details and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.Results: All ten patients diagnosed with incarcerated obturator hernia during the reference period were females (average age 72.1 ± 11.8 years; average weight 44.1 ± 6.9 kg; average body mass index 17.8 ± 2.1 kg/m2; average operating time 63 ± 15 min; average hospital stay 6.2 ± 6.6 days). Twelve occult hernias, including six contralateral OHs, two ipsilateral femoral hernias and two bilateral femoral hernias were detected in six patients (60 %), which were simultaneously repaired after laparoscopic exploration. Nine patients (90 %) were successfully treated with synthetic mesh by laparoscopic technique. Only one case required intraoperative conversion to open surgery due to strangulated intestine with perforation. Wound infection was reported in one patient who had undergone bowel resection, but with an eventual complete recovery. Postoperative period was uneventful in the other nine patients. No recurrence or complications were reported on follow-up (mean duration of follow-up: 6-54 months).Conclusion: In this study, laparoscopic technique was associated with a reduced duration of hospital stay and fewer complications. In addition to being a safe and minimally invasive strategy, it allowed for simultaneous diagnosis and treatment of occult hernias during the same procedure. The approach may be a better option for the treatment of incarcerated OH and occult hernias in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mean age of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been increasing steadily in the last decades, so managing very old patients has become common practice. The oldest patients are under-represented in clinical trials, so specific evidence is scarce. Still, antithrombotic therapy and invasive strategy are the pillars of appropriate treatment even in the oldest patients. However, the elderly population is a heterogeneous group showing important divergences between chronological and biological age, which needs specific evaluation. Physical, and social function, geriatric syndromes, such as frailty or cognitive decline, and comorbidities must be taken into consideration for clinical decision-making but this requires evaluation beyond the traditional cardiologic approach. In general, elderly patients with ACS who are functional and independent should be treated with the same methods as younger patients although more cautiously. However, specific measures should be put in place to prevent functional decline and delirium, two of the most frequent and devastating specific complications in older patients. Multidisciplinary approaches are needed for that. In general, a new paradigm for the management of very old patients with ACS is warranted, in which evaluation of outcomes traditionally ignored by cardiologists should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The elderly are less likely to undergo an invasive strategy for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim is to determine the predictors for an invasive strategy and to evaluate the revascularization effect on outcome. Methods Retrospective analysis of ACS patients (P) with ≥80 years, admitted between 2010 and 2014, in a national ACS registry. P were divided in intervened (G1) and non-intervened (G2) groups. We determined predictors for an invasive approach – percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) – and compared the one year outcome between groups. Results From 11,113P admitted with ACS, 2014 had ≥80 years. 1025P were included in G1. Predictors for an invasive strategy were STEMI (OR 4.97; P < 0.001), previous PCI (OR 2.02; P < 0.001), sinus rhythm (OR 1.56; P = 0.002), haemoglobin at admission (OR 1.10; P = 0.003). Predictors of no intervention were female gender (OR 0.68; P = 0.002), previous ACS (OR0.67; P = 0.013), previous CABG (OR 0.60; P = 0.035), heart failure (OR 0.48; P < 0.001), stroke (OR 0.58; P = 0.002), dementia (OR 0.28; P < 0.001), heart rate (OR 0.99; P < 0.003) and ejection fraction < 50% (OR 0.68; P = 0.001). Hospital mortality was inferior in G1 (8.3% vs. 13.6%; P < 0.001), being conservative strategy (HR 2.63; P < 0.001), STEMI (HR 2.11; P = 0.001), dementia (HR 2.08; P = 0.021), inotropics (HR 9.82; P < 0.001) and ejection fraction <50% (HR 2.65; P < 0.001) predictors of mortality. In propensity score analysis, at one year follow up G1 had a better survival (88.9% vs. 79.6%; P < 0.001). Conclusion In elderly patients with ACS, an invasive strategy was associated with short and long-term survival advantage. The predictors for invasive intervention are STEMI, previous PCI, sinus rhythm and haemoglobin at admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims To define a benchmark target for an invasive strategy (IS) rate appropriate for performance assessment in intermediate-to-high risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods and results During the BLITZ-4 campaign, which aimed at improving the quality of care in 163 Italian coronary care units, 4923/5786 (85.1%) of consecutive patients admitted with NSTE-ACS with troponin elevation and/or dynamic ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram were managed with IS. The reasons driving the choice (RDC) for a conservative strategy (CS) in the remaining 863 patients were prospectively recorded. In 33.8%, CS was mandatory because of patients refusal, known coronary anatomy or death before coronary angiography; in 52.8% it was clinically justified because of active stroke, bleeding, advanced frailty, severe comorbidities, contraindication to antiplatelet therapy or because they were considered to be at low risk; only in 13.4% the reasons, such as renal failure, advanced age or other, were less stringent. As compared to patients undergoing IS, those in the CS were 12 years older and had significantly more severe comorbidities. The in-hospital and 6-month all-cause mortality were 9.0% vs 0.9% and 22.0% vs 3.9% in CS and IS groups respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). Conclusion As the RDC for CS were clinically correct in vast majority of cases the observed 85% invasive strategy rate may be considered as the desirable benchmark target in patients with NSTE-ACS. For the same reason, it remains questionable if the higher rate of IS could have improved the prognosis in CS patients, despite their highly unfavorable prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]