Search

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between time from diagnosis of treatment-naïve exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to the introduction of anti-VEGF treatment and anatomical and functional outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Included were treatment-naïve exudative AMD patients who presented to a single tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2018. All patients were treated within the first 30 days of their diagnosis with three monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (prompt anti-VEGF) were injected with bevacizumab within ten days, group 2 (intermediate anti-VEGF) within 11–20 days, and group 3 (delayed anti-VEGF) within 21–30 days from diagnosis. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared up to two years from treatment. Results: 146 eyes of 146 patients were included. Sixty-eight patients were in the prompt anti-VEGF group, 31 in the intermediate anti-VEGF group, and 47 in the delayed anti-VEGF group. Following the induction phase of three intravitreal bevacizumab injections, the mean central subfield macular thickness (328.0 ± 115.4 µm vs. 364.6 ± 127.2 µm vs. 337.7 ± 150.1 µm, p = 0.432) and the best-corrected visual acuity (0.47 ± 0.38 vs. 0.59 ± 0.48 vs. 0.47 ± 0.44 logMAR units, p = 0.458) were comparable between the prompt, intermediate and delayed anti-VEGF groups. Anatomical and functional outcomes, treatment burden, number of relapses and eyes with second-line anti-VEGF therapy were comparable between the groups at both 1-year and 2-year timepoints. Conclusions: Our real-world evidence data emphasize that even if anti-VEGF induction cannot be initiated promptly within ten days from diagnosis of naïve exudative AMD, the visual and anatomical prognosis of the patients may not worsen if the treatment is started within one month of diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Georgios D Panos,1,2 Arun Lakshmanan,1 Panagiotis Dadoukis,3 Matteo Ripa,4 Lorenzo Motta,4 Winfried M Amoaku1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK; 2Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; 3Eye Treatment Centre, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; 4Department of Ophthalmology, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UKCorrespondence: Georgios D Panos, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Derby Road, Lenton, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, Tel +44 115 924 9924, Email gdpanos@gmail.com Lorenzo Motta, Department of Ophthalmology, William Harvey Hospital, Kennington Road, Willesborough, Ashford, Kent, TN24 0LZ, UK, Tel +44 1233 633331, Email lorenzo.motta@nhs.netAbstract: Degenerative eye conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion are major contributors to significant vision loss in developed nations. The primary therapeutic approach for managing complications linked to these diseases involves the intravitreal delivery of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments. Faricimab is a novel, humanised, bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds all VEGF-A isoforms and Angiopoietin-2, which has been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for the treatment of neovascular AMD and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Intravitreal faricimab holds the promise of reducing the treatment burden for patients with these conditions by achieving comparable or superior therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. The scope of faricimab’s application includes addressing complex macular conditions such as DMO. This review intends to elucidate the distinctive pharmacological characteristics of faricimab and provide an overview of the key clinical trials and real-world studies that assess its effectiveness and safety in treating degenerative macular diseases.Keywords: degenerative macular disorders, faricimab, anti-VEGF, efficacy, safety, intravitreal treatment, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy

Copyright of Die Ophthalmologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Evdoxia-Maria Karasavvidou,1 Paris Tranos,2 Georgios D Panos3 1Karasavvidou Eye Centre, Naousa, Greece; 2Ophthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UKCorrespondence: Georgios D Panos, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Derby Road, Lenton, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, Tel +44 115 924 9924, Email gdpanos@gmail.comAbstract: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion represent some of the commonest degenerative conditions that lead to severe vision impairment in the developed countries. The gold standard treatment of complications associated with these conditions is the intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Brolucizumab is a newly developed, humanised, single-chain fragment of a monoclonal antibody binding all VEGF-A isoforms, which was recently approved for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal brolucizumab promises to reduce treatment burden for nAMD patients by achieving comparable therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. Promising also appears its use for the treatment of more challenging maculopathies like diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of brolucizumab and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of degenerative macular disorders.Keywords: degenerative macular disorders, brolucizumab, anti-VEGF, efficacy, safety, intravitreal treatment

Aims: In the present study, we aimed to compare the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment on intraocular pressure (IOP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with and without pseudoexfoliation (PEX). Materials and Methods: A total of 24 patients, 12 with PEX (12 eyes) and 12 without PEX (12 eyes), receiving IVR treatment for neovascular AMD between June 2017 and June 2019, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were composed of the history of glaucoma, uveitis, intravitreal steroid administration, pars plana vitrectomy surgery, and less than three IVR injections. Such criteria as age, gender, follow-up times, number of injections administered, IOP, and RNFL thickness before the first injection and one month after the last injection were also recorded. Results: Age, gender, follow-up time, and the number of injections were similar in groups with and without PEX (p > 0.05). While mean post-treatment IOP values were not significantly higher in the PEX group (14.50 ± 3.06 vs. 12.91 ± 1.83 mmHg, p = 0.065), the values were significant for the non-PEX group (13.25 ± 2.76 vs. 11.83 ± 2.69 mmHg, p = 0.01), and these values were within normal IOP limits. Additionally, RNFL thickness was significantly thinner after treatment in both groups (91.41 ± 7.14 vs. 94.00 ± 6.76 in those with PEX; 95.58 ± 5.91 vs. 97.66 ± 6.89 in those without PEX; p < 0.05). The decrease in RNFL thickness in the PEX group was 2.58 ± 1.62 µ and in the non-PEX group was 2.08 ± 1.98 µ. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of RNFL thinning (p = 0.505). Discussion: Ranibizumab may reduce RNFL thickness in patients with PEX. Longer-term studies including larger populations are necessary for understanding IOP and RNFL changes after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection.

Copyright of Acta Medica Croatica is the property of Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: To verify the correct decision-making procedure on performing an intravitreal injection by investigating the in vivo wound morphology and evolution of 22-gauge wounds after dexamethasone oblique injection with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Prospective, observational consecutive case series. Methods: Subjects underwent a dexamethasone injection at University Eye Clinic of Turin. All the injections have been performed in an oblique (aka beveled or angled) fashion. Patients were divided according to the number of injections already performed with dexamethasone. Group 1 consisted of patients at the first injection, group 2 of patients at a second or more injection always in the same quadrant, and group 3 of patients at the second or more injection in a different quadrant. The incisions were imaged with the Heidelberg SPECTRALIS OCT device on postoperative days 1, 8, and 15. The main outcome measure was wound structure/characteristics (e.g., presence of gaping) as evaluated with OCT. Surgical and ocular parameters were also recorded. Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients were investigated. OCT demonstrated closed wounds in all eyes on postoperative days 1, 8, and 15. In all patients, the external (entry) side of the incision was seen as a gape; however, the rest of the wound was closed. No complications were recorded in the different patients during the follow-up. In patients of group 1, we identified the scleral pathway in 10 eyes at day 1. At 8 days in 9 of 10 eyes, the sclera had returned to its restitutio ad integrum. In patients of group 2, the scleral pathway was recognizable on the first day of control; in 7 patients, this was accompanied by the presence of intrascleral edema with peri-wound fluid. At the 8-day checkup, 3 eyes still showed signs attributable to the intrascleral pathway accompanied by peri-wound edema. In group 3, it was possible to identify the intrascleral pathway in 8 patients. There were no signs of intrascleral peri-wound edema or other anatomical changes in 9 patients as early as the first day. In the 8-day follow-up, the signs of scleral edema were absent in the single patient who presented them. At 15 days, there were no signs of scleral pathway in all eyes analyzed. Conclusions: Speaking of intravitreal injections of slow-release dexamethasone, the technique that involves moving the conjunctiva and a beveled or angled sclerotomy after a careful choice of the injection site, paying attention to vary the quadrant involved with each puncture, reduces the number of days of closure of the sclera via and the scleral damage, thus protecting the patient from complications. For the future, it is hoped that the operating microscope and intraoperative OCT will be used on every occasion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate intravitreal 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi) (Iluvien®) for the treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitis with associated cystoid macular edema (CME). Methods: A retrospective review of medical reports from a single Danish tertiary centre including 20 patients (20 eyes), treated with 0.19 mg FAi for non-infectious uveitic CME. The primary endpoints were change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). The secondary endpoints were recurrence rate, change in systemic treatment, and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: Mean follow-up of the 20 eyes was 2.3 ± 1.1 years. BCVA improved at 6 (p = 0.13), 12 (p = 0.05), 18 (p = 0.03), and 24 months and CRT decreased at 6 (p = 0.004), 12 (p = 0.006), 18, and 24 months after 0.19 mg FAi. Within 18 months after implantation, four of 14 patients (28.6%) relapsed. Three of five patients discontinued systemic corticosteroids within 4 months and one patient continued with reduced dose. Five of 10 patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at time of implantation discontinued within 1 year. No patients started new systemic treatment. Eight eyes were treated with topical IOP-lowering medication at the time of implantation, of these two later underwent trabeculectomy. There were no complications associated with previous glaucoma surgery. Conclusion: This long-term follow-up study showed that intravitreal treatment with 0.19 mg FAi should be considered in the treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitic CME in selected patients. This treatment is safe even in selected glaucoma patients and may offer reduction or cessation of local or systemic anti-inflammatory treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: In the present study, we aimed to compare the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment on intraocular pressure (IOP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with and without pseudoexfoliation (PEX). Materials and Methods: A total of 24 patients, 12 with PEX (12 eyes) and 12 without PEX (12 eyes), receiving IVR treatment for neovascular AMD between June 2017 and June 2019, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were composed of the history of glaucoma, uveitis, intravitreal steroid administration, pars plana vitrectomy surgery, and less than three IVR injections. Such criteria as age, gender, follow-up times, number of injections administered, IOP, and RNFL thickness before the first injection and one month after the last injection were also recorded. Results: Age, gender, follow-up time, and the number of injections were similar in groups with and without PEX (p > 0.05). While mean post-treatment IOP values were not significantly higher in the PEX group (14.50 ± 3.06 vs. 12.91 ± 1.83 mmHg, p = 0.065), the values were significant for the non-PEX group (13.25 ± 2.76 vs. 11.83 ± 2.69 mmHg, p = 0.01), and these values were within normal IOP limits. Additionally, RNFL thickness was significantly thinner after treatment in both groups (91.41 ± 7.14 vs. 94.00 ± 6.76 in those with PEX; 95.58 ± 5.91 vs. 97.66 ± 6.89 in those without PEX; p < 0.05). The decrease in RNFL thickness in the PEX group was 2.58 ± 1.62 µ and in the non-PEX group was 2.08 ± 1.98 µ. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of RNFL thinning (p = 0.505). Discussion: Ranibizumab may reduce RNFL thickness in patients with PEX. Longer-term studies including larger populations are necessary for understanding IOP and RNFL changes after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To gain information about multiple dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I) injections in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes in real-life clinical settings. Methods: Patients with DME treated with multiple (≥5) DEX-I injections between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were retrospectively enrolled regardless of previous treatment with anti-VEGF agents. All patients were evaluated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR, ocular fundus, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at baseline and at 3 months after the last DEX-I injection. Multiple DEX-I injections were administered when necessary in case of DME recurrence. Main efficacy measures were changes in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to 3 months after the last DEX-I injection; main secondary measures were an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), the need for cataract surgery, endophthalmitis, and vitreous hemorrhage. Results: Seventeen patients (18 eyes) with DME and mean age (± SD) of 54.3 ± 8.16 years were treated with DEX-I injections between 2014 and 2018. The majority of eyes (77.8%) had been treated with a mean of 6.3 ± 3.2 anti-VEGF agents before switching to DEX-I. During a mean follow-up period of 37.6 months and after a mean number of 5.9 DEX-I injections, visual acuity improved or stabilized in 77.8% of all eyes, accompanied by a significant reduction in CRT. An increase in IOP was recorded in 38.8% of all patients, while a surgical procedure was needed for cataract in 73.3% of all phakic patients. Conclusions: In this real-life experience in Italy, multiple DEX-I treatments showed good efficacy with no new safety concerns. The follow-up duration of >3 years and a greater number of DEX-I intravitreal injections compared to other observations confirm the positive balance between risks and benefits of DEX-I in the long term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aims: To evaluate the timing and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of diabetic macular oedema (DME) recurrence according to baseline OCT patterns in patients treated with dexamethasone implant (DEX-I). Methods: This is a retrospective observational study (72 eyes/65 patients). Best-corrected visual acuity, timing of DME recurrence, and SD-OCT pattern [intraretinal cysts (IRC), IRC plus subretinal fluid (mixed), external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid (IS/OS) layer integrity] were assessed at baseline and monthly until first DME recurrence. Results: Forty-two (58.3%) and 30 (41.6%) DME eyes had an IRC and mixed DME pattern at baseline, respectively. Twenty-four out of thirty mixed eyes (80%) relapsed without subretinal fluid. At baseline, mixed eyes showed similar changes in ELM and IS/OS (60 and 76.6% of eyes, respectively) versus IRC eyes (42.8 and 80.9% of eyes). After DME recurrence, more mixed eyes at baseline showed ELM and IS/OS changes (63.3 and 86.6%) than IRC eyes (50 and 76.2%). 33.3% of mixed eyes had DME recurrence at ≥ 6 months from first DEX-I implant versus 19% of IRC eyes. Conclusions: Mixed DME eyes were treated with DEX-I relapse later and more frequently without subretinal fluid than IRC eyes. SD-OCT characteristics of different DME patterns at baseline can predict morphological features and timing of DME recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between time from diagnosis of treatment-naïve exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to the introduction of anti-VEGF treatment and anatomical and functional outcomes., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: Included were treatment-naïve exudative AMD patients who presented to a single tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2018. All patients were treated within the first 30 days of their diagnosis with three monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (prompt anti-VEGF) were injected with bevacizumab within ten days, group 2 (intermediate anti-VEGF) within 11-20 days, and group 3 (delayed anti-VEGF) within 21-30 days from diagnosis. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared up to two years from treatment., Results: 146 eyes of 146 patients were included. Sixty-eight patients were in the prompt anti-VEGF group, 31 in the intermediate anti-VEGF group, and 47 in the delayed anti-VEGF group. Following the induction phase of three intravitreal bevacizumab injections, the mean central subfield macular thickness (328.0 ± 115.4 µm vs. 364.6 ± 127.2 µm vs. 337.7 ± 150.1 µm, p = 0.432) and the best-corrected visual acuity (0.47 ± 0.38 vs. 0.59 ± 0.48 vs. 0.47 ± 0.44 logMAR units, p = 0.458) were comparable between the prompt, intermediate and delayed anti-VEGF groups. Anatomical and functional outcomes, treatment burden, number of relapses and eyes with second-line anti-VEGF therapy were comparable between the groups at both 1-year and 2-year timepoints., Conclusions: Our real-world evidence data emphasize that even if anti-VEGF induction cannot be initiated promptly within ten days from diagnosis of naïve exudative AMD, the visual and anatomical prognosis of the patients may not worsen if the treatment is started within one month of diagnosis.

Objective: To compare the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (group 1), bevacizumab (group 2), and triamcinolone (group 3) for center-involving diabetic macular edema. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 275 eyes of 208 consecutive patients. Visual acuity (VA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters and central macular thickness (CMT) values on optical coherence tomography were extracted. Reported side effects were noted. Results: At 6 months, the mean changes in VA in group 1, group 2, and group 3 were +4.9, +4.3, and +4.6 letters, respectively (p = 0.911). Improvement of CMT at 6 and 24 months was significantly better in group 3 compared to groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.012 and p = 0.001, respectively). At 24 months, the only independent variable affecting the change in VA was initial VA (p = 0.020). Cataract and glaucoma prevalences were higher in group 3 (p = 0.000 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Three treatment methods had similar effects with regard to improvement in VA; however, intravitreal triamcinolone provided additional anatomical improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to present five cases with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) who were found to have intraocular air bubbles after intravitreal injection (IVI) treatment. The medical records of 148 infants who underwent IVI for ROP were retrospectively reviewed and the ones who demonstrated post-injection intraocular air bubble formation were recruited. Of the 148 patients (31 babies received ranibizumab, 20 babies received aflibercept, 97 babies received bevacizumab), five were found to have intraocular air bubbles right after the IVI. Two infants received intravitreal ranibizumab and three received intravitreal bevacizumab injections. Although intraocular pressure increased temporarily, no intraocular sterile or infective reactions were observed in the postoperative period. The air bubble was found to resorb spontaneously within 72 h. The occurrence rate of the intravitreal air bubbles in our series was 3.37 % despite previously not been reported in the literature. Due to the intravitreal air injection risk, it is important to be more careful while preparing the intravitreal medication before treatment in premature babies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Noninfectious posterior uveitis (NPU) comprises a heterogeneous group of vision-threatening, immune-mediated ocular and systemic diseases. It is predominantly bilateral and recurrent and, if not treated properly, leads to severe tissue damage that threatens the eyesight. In industrialized countries ca. 10-20% of all cases of blindness are caused by NPU. An NPU can occur at any age but is most common between the ages of 20 and 50 years. Laboratory diagnostic and imaging procedures enable an increasingly better differentiation of the disease spectrum. This makes it possible to better assess the course and prognosis of individual disease entities. An increasing repertoire of systemic and intravitreal forms of treatment has already led to more favorable long-term treatment outcomes. It can be expected that further progress can be achieved with better knowledge of the pathophysiology of the different clinical disorders and appropriate, targeted treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of this study was to characterize the extent of toxicity of focal carboplatin administration and to identify the dose limiting toxicity in rabbit eyes depending on administered concentrations. New Zealand white male rabbits (n = 18) were treated with 1 of 3 regimens: a single periocular injection of 15 mg of carboplatin (group I), a single periocular injection of 30 mg of carboplatin (group II) and a single transcorneal intravitreal injection of 0.05 mg of carboplatin (group III). Ophthalmologic examinations and vitreous samplings were performed under dissociative anaesthesia at regular intervals during next 2 (groups I and III) or 3 (group II) weeks. Carboplatin concentrations in vitreous samples were assessed by atomic absorption spectroscopy. At the end of experiments, all rabbit eyes were obtained for histopathologic examination. Clinical and histological evidence of toxicity was graded into four grades according to anatomical structures of the rabbit eye. The dose limiting toxicity was reached in group II after periocular injection of 30 mg of carboplatin and in group III after intravitreal injection of 0.05 mg of carboplatin. No systemic toxicity was observed in any group. Focal carboplatin administration may decrease systemic exposure to this cytotoxic drug in the retinoblastoma treatment. This moreover suggests that focal carboplatin administration is a promising approach and challenge for advanced retinoblastoma chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants (DEX-I) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naïve to therapy or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment, in a single-center, real-world setting., Methods: Patients diagnosed with DME and treated with DEX-I were retrospectively enrolled in the study and split in two groups: naïve (Group 1, n  = 64) and refractory (Group 2, n  = 64) to treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at 1 month, and every 3 months after each DEX-I implant. Main outcome measures were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to follow-up visits., Results: Significant improvements in BCVA were observed in treatment-naïve patients at 6 months following the first and second DEX-I injection ( p  = 0.0023 and p  = 0.0063, respectively), with significant reductions in mean CMT at 6 months after all DEX implants. In treatment-refractory patients, mean CMT was significantly reduced from baseline to 6 months ( p  < 0.05) after all DEX-I injections, although no changes were observed in BCVA., Conclusions: DEX-I improved visual acuity and macular edema mostly in treatment-naïve patients, suggesting DEX-I may be a viable first-line treatment option in DME.

We evaluated the effect of intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) on blood coagulation parameters including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time (TT), as well as asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), nitric oxide (NO), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and interleukin 18 (IL-18) serum levels in patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD). Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients with nAMD were included. Parameters were evaluated before and 2–3 days after the first IVA injection, and then immediately before and 2–3 days after the third IVA injection. We revealed prolongation of the TT after the initial loading phase of IVA (p = 0.041) and a significant increase in IL-18 serum concentration immediately before the third IVA administration compared to baseline (p = 0.037). There were no statistically significant differences of other parameters and PT, APTT, ADMA, NO, and IL-6 values remained within the normal range at each of the time points of the study. Our results suggest that repeated IVA administration may affect the common blood coagulation pathway, which manifests as a prolongation of the TT value. Furthermore, we showed a significant increase in serum concentration of the pro-inflammatory cytokineIL-18during the initial loading phase of IVA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the main pathological features of the diabetes mellitus spectrum. It is estimated that in 2020 about 4 million people worldwide suffered from blindness or visual impairment caused by DR. Many patients cannot access treatment, mostly because of high costs, while others discontinue it prematurely due to the high number of intravitreal administrations required, or the occurrence of ocular complications, or discomfort in quality of life., Areas Covered: The aims of this paper are to summarize the current understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy, focus on the most promising new approaches to treatment that are being evaluated in clinical trials, and outline the potential financial impact of new drugs in future markets., Expert Opinion: Slow-release systems with steroids, anti-VEGF or sunitinib are promising. Oral imatinib would avoid the ocular complications of intravitreal drugs. Brolucizumab and abicipar pegol may be superior to aflibercept and ranibizumab with the advantage of less frequent administrations. Faricimab, active on Tie-2 receptors, is being evaluated in two phase 3 clinical trials. Further knowledge of the efficacy and safety of these drugs is necessary before their final approval for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

Background: Subretinal hemorrhage involving the macula is a typical complication in a variety of retinal diseases, whereby age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is by far the leading cause., Method: A literature search was carried out in PubMed., Results: Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of various approaches to the management of submacular hemorrhage, including intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment, pneumatic displacement supported by fibrinolytic agents or surgical drainage., Discussion: There is currently no consensus regarding evidence-based standard treatment for macular hemorrhage, although there is a trend towards minimally invasive approaches. Regardless of the choice of the primary treatment approach, the time to treatment and an accompanying intravitreal treatment with VEGF inhibitors are decisive for the functional outcome.

Purpose: To evaluate the resolution rate in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (≤ 1500 μm) with or without macular holes (≤ 400 μm) after therapy with intravitreal ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) injection in a clinical setting., Methods: Until now we have prospectively examined 21 eyes of 21 consecutive patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes who underwent intravitreal operative injection of 0.1 ml ocriplasmin. The best corrected visual acuity and high-resolution optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) ultrastructural parameters were measured before injection and again 1, 3 and 4 months after treatment. The numbers of resolved vitreomacular traction and closed macular holes were documented., Results: Vitreomacular traction was resolved in 15 out of 21 (71 %) eyes. Of the five eyes which initially presented with vitreomacular traction with macular holes, all showed resolution of vitreomacular traction but only two of the macular holes were closed. The average best corrected visual acuity was 0.38 logMAR (± 0.23) at baseline and 0.43 logMAR (± 0.28), 0.38 logMAR (± 0.27) and 0.36 logMAR (± 0.24) 1, 3 and 4 months after injection, respectively. The average foveal thickness was 355.95 μm (± 114.53 μm) at baseline, reducing to 304.61 μm (± 100.91 μm), 308.00 μm (±76.17 μm) and 277.50 μm (± 26.24 μm) after 1, 3 and 4 months, respectively., Conclusion: In this ongoing study there was a high percentage of resolution of vitreomacular traction (71 %) 1 month after intravitreal operative injection of Jetrea® and closure of two out of five macular holes. This was further associated with stabilization of visual acuity and reduction of foveal thickness. Further investigations are necessary to document the effectiveness of the pharmacological vitreolysis in a clinical setting.

Objective: To describe the course and outcome of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis among AIDS patients treated with intravitreal ganciclovir and systemic highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The secondary objective was to compare the course of CMV retinitis between patients receiving HAART and those not receiving this treatment., Design: A retrospective cohort design consisting of 21 eyes from 16 patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis consecutively enrolled between January 1996 and August 1999. All patients received intravitreal ganciclovir therapy, and half of the patients began HAART as well. Duration of intravitreal therapy and ensuing disease quiescence, as well as CD4+ T cell counts at diagnosis and at cessation of ganciclovir, were calculated. Secondly, instantaneous hazards for outcomes such as CMV retinitis progression, ocular complications and mortality were compared., Setting: Tertiary care centre in Ottawa, Ontario., Results: Five of eight patients receiving HAART discontinued intravitreal ganciclovir after a mean treatment period of 428 days. During this period, their mean CD4+ count rose from 7.5 to 190microL. Subsequently, none of these patients experienced retinitis progression during follow-up periods lasting up to 820 days (mean of 617 days). Progression of CMV retinitis was 11.4 times more likely among those not receiving HAART (P=0.049)., Conclusions: On initiating HAART, patients with CMV retinitis may enjoy significant recovery in CD4+ counts and sustained retinitis quiescence without specific anti-CMV therapy. Intravitreal ganciclovir injections seem well suited to offer effective CMV control during temporary periods of decreased CD4+ counts while awaiting HAART-mediated immune system reconstitution.