Search

Background While inhalation therapy efficacy hinges on attaining proper peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR), the prevalence of inappropriate PIFR among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unstudied in Korea. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of inappropriate PIFR, its correlation with COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR. Methods We enrolled 108 patients with COPD who had been using the same inhaler for at least 1 year without exacerbations. PIFR was measured using an inspiratory flow meter (In-Check DIAL G16). Demographic, clinical, pulmonary function, and CAT score data were collected. Inappropriate was defined as PIFR 90 L/min for aerosol device users. Results The cohort comprised 87 (80.6%) men, mean age 71.0±8.5 years, with mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 69.1%±1.8% predicted. Twenty-nine (26.9%) used aerosol devices only, 76 (70.4%) used DPIs only, and three (2.8%) used both. Inappropriate PIFRs were found in 17.2% of aerosol device users, and 42.1% of DPI users. CAT scores were significantly higher in the inappropriate PIFR group than in the appropriate PIFR group (11.2±7.7 vs. 7.5±4.9, p=0.003). In DPI users, female, shorter height, lower body weight and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were associated with inappropriate PIFR. Conclusion The prevalence of inappropriate PIFR among patients with COPD is 17.2% for aerosol device users, and 42.1% for DPI users. Suboptimal PIFR correlates with female gender, shorter stature, lower weight and MVV in DPI users.

Background: Some experts recommend specific ventilator settings during nebulization for mechanically ventilated patients, such as inspiratory pause, high inspiratory to expiratory ratio, and so on. However, it is unclear whether those settings improve aerosol delivery. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of ventilator settings on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: Salbutamol (5.0 mg/2.5 mL) was nebulized by a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) in an adult MV model. VMN was placed at the inlet of humidifier and 15 cm away from the Y-piece of the inspiratory limb. Eight scenarios with different ventilator settings were compared with endotracheal tube (ETT) connecting 15 cm from the Y-piece, including tidal volumes of 6–8 mL/kg, respiratory rates of 12–20 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1.0–2.5 seconds, inspiratory pause of 0–0.3 seconds, and bias flow of 3.5 L/min. In-line suction catheter was utilized in two scenarios. Delivered drug distal to the ETT was collected by a filter, and drug was assayed by an ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm). Results: Compared to the use of inspiratory pause, the inhaled dose without inspiratory pause was either higher or similar across all ventilation settings. Inhaled dose was negatively correlated with inspiratory flow with VMN placed at 15 cm away from the Y-piece (rs = −0.68, p < 0.001) and at the inlet of humidifier (rs = −0.83, p < 0.001). The utilization of in-line suction catheter reduced inhaled dose, regardless of the ventilator settings and nebulizer placements. Conclusions: When VMN was placed at the inlet of humidifier, directly connecting the Y-piece to ETT without a suction catheter improved aerosol delivery. In this configuration, the inhaled dose increased as the inspiratory flow decreased, inspiratory pause had either no or a negative impact on aerosol delivery. The inhaled dose was greater with VMN placed at the inlet of humidifier than 15 cm away the Y-piece. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revue d'Orthopédie Dento-Faciale is the property of Parresia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) is a therapeutic option for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Improved patient selection criteria are needed to target those most likely to benefit. We hypothesized that the pattern of negative effort dependence (NED) on inspiratory flow limited waveforms recorded during sleep, which has been correlated with the site of upper airway collapse, would contribute to the prediction of HGNS outcome. We developed a machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify NED patterns in pre-treatment sleep studies. We hypothesized that the predominant NED pattern would differ between HGNS responders and non-responders. Methods: An ML algorithm to identify NED patterns on the inspiratory portion of the nasal pressure waveform was derived from 5 development set polysomnograms. The algorithm was applied to pre-treatment sleep studies of subjects who underwent HGNS implantation to determine the percentage of each NED pattern. HGNS response was defined by STAR trial criteria for success (apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) reduced by > 50% and < 20/h) as well as by a change in AHI and oxygenation metrics. The predominant NED pattern in HGNS responders and non-responders was determined. Other variables including demographics and oxygenation metrics were also assessed between responders and non-responders. Results: Of 45 subjects, 4 were excluded due to technically inadequate polysomnograms. In the remaining 41 subjects, ML accurately distinguished three NED patterns (minimal, non-discontinuous, and discontinuous). The percentage of NED minimal breaths was significantly greater in responders compared with non-responders (p = 0.01) when the response was defined based on STAR trial criteria, change in AHI, and oxygenation metrics. Conclusion: ML can accurately identify NED patterns in pre-treatment sleep studies. There was a statistically significant difference in the predominant NED pattern between HGNS responders and non-responders with a greater NED minimal pattern in responders. Prospective studies incorporating NED patterns into predictive modeling of factors determining HGNS outcomes are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preclinical studies suggest that ketamine stimulates breathing. We investigated whether adding a ketamine infusion at low and high doses to propofol sedation improves inspiratory flow and enhances sedation in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients. Methods: In this prospective interventional study, twelve intubated, spontaneously breathing patients received ketamine infusions at 5 mcg/kg/min, followed by 10 mcg/kg/min for 1 h each. Airway flow, pressure, and esophageal pressure were recorded during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) at baseline, and during the SBT conducted at the end of each ketamine infusion regimen. SBT consisted of one-minute breathing with zero end-expiratory pressure and no pressure support. Changes in inspiratory flow at the pre-specified time points were assessed as the primary outcome. Ketamine-induced change in beta-gamma electroencephalogram power was the key secondary endpoint. We also analyzed changes in other ventilatory parameters respiratory timing, and resistive and elastic inspiratory work of breathing. Results: Ketamine infusion of 5 and 10 mcg/kg/min increased inspiratory flow (median, IQR) from 0.36 (0.29-0.46) L/s at baseline to 0.47 (0.32-0.57) L/s and 0.44 (0.33-0.58) L/s, respectively (p =.013). Resistive work of breathing decreased from 0.4 (0.1-0.6) J/l at baseline to 0.2 (0.1-0.3) J/l after ketamine 10 mcg/kg/min (p =.042), while elastic work of breathing remained unchanged. Electroencephalogram beta-gamma power (19-44 Hz) increased compared to baseline (p <.01). Conclusions: In intubated, spontaneously breathing patients receiving a constant rate of propofol, ketamine increased inspiratory flow, reduced inspiratory work of breathing, and was associated with an "activated" electroencephalographic pattern. These characteristics might facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxygenation through High Flow Delivery Systems (HFO) is described as capable of delivering accurate FiO2. Meanwhile, peak inspiratory flow [Formula: see text] ) of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure can reach up to 120 L/min, largely exceeding HFO flow. Currently, very few data on the reliability of HFO devices at these high [Formula: see text] are available. We sought to evaluate factors affecting oxygenation while using HFO systems at high [Formula: see text] in a bench study. Spontaneous breathing was generated with a mechanical test lung connected to a mechanical ventilator Servo-i®, set to volume control mode. Gas flow from a HFO device was delivered to the test lung. The influence on effective inspired oxygen fraction of three parameters (FiO2 0.6, 0.8, and 1, [Formula: see text] from 28 to 98.1 L/min, and HFO Gas Flows from 40 to 60 L/min) were analyzed and are reported. The present bench study demonstrates that during HFO treatment, measured FiO2 in the lung does not equal set FiO2 on the device. The substance of this variation (ΔFiO2) is tightly correlated to [Formula: see text] (Pearson's coefficient of 0.94, p-value < 0.001). Additionally, set FiO2 and Flow at HFO device appear to significatively affect ΔFiO2 as well (p-values < 0.001, adjusted to [Formula: see text] ). The result of multivariate linear regression indicates predictors ([Formula: see text] , Flow and set FiO2) to explain 92% of the variance of delta FiO2 through K-Fold Cross Validation. Moreover, adjunction of a dead space in the breathing circuit significantly decreased ΔFiO2 (p < 0.01). The present bench study did expose a weakness of HFO devices in reliability of delivering accurate FIO2 at high [Formula: see text] as well as, to a lesser extent, at [Formula: see text] below equivalent set HFO Flows. Moreover, set HFO flow and set FIO2 did influence the variability of effective inspired oxygen fraction. The adjunction of a dead space in the experimental set-up significantly amended this variability and should thus be further studied in order to improve success rate of HFO therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While inhalation therapy efficacy hinges on attaining proper peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR), the prevalence of inappropriate PIFR among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unstudied in Korea. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of inappropriate PIFR, its correlation with COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR., Methods: We enrolled 108 patients with COPD who had been using the same inhaler for at least 1 year without exacerbations. PIFR was measured using an inspiratory flow meter (In-Check DIAL G16). Demographic, clinical, pulmonary function, and CAT score data were collected. Inappropriate was defined as PIFR &lt;60 L/min for dry power inhaler (DPI) users, and &gt;90 L/min for aerosol device users., Results: The cohort comprised 87 (80.6%) men, mean age 71.0±8.5 years, with mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 69.1%±1.8% predicted. Twenty-nine (26.9%) used aerosol devices only, 76 (70.4%) used DPIs only, and three (2.8%) used both. Inappropriate PIFRs were found in 17.2% of aerosol device users, and 42.1% of DPI users. CAT scores were significantly higher in the inappropriate PIFR group than in the appropriate PIFR group (11.2±7.7 vs. 7.5±4.9, p=0.003). In DPI users, female, shorter height, lower body weight and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were associated with inappropriate PIFR., Conclusion: The prevalence of inappropriate PIFR among patients with COPD is 17.2% for aerosol device users, and 42.1% for DPI users. Suboptimal PIFR correlates with female gender, shorter stature, lower weight and MVV in DPI users.

The effectiveness of inhalation therapy can be significantly reduced by a number of problems. For example, inhalation technique errors can reduce the dose delivered by 22-95% compared to the optimal value in patients with technical errors in the use of the inhaler. Sub-optimal inspiratory flow rates in a number of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma are often the cause of technical errors during inhalation. Patient education does not produce the expected results, as the underlying cause of reduced flow is high hyperinflation and weakening of the respiratory musculature. The use of technologically outdated inhalers is another significant cause of reduced therapy effectiveness. Patient education and even conversion to a different inhaler do not always increase the effectiveness of therapy. Respimat, a brand new delivery agent introduced in 2004, allows 39% to 67% of the nominal dose to be delivered to the airways, while the degree of pulmonary deposit is independent of inspiratory flow and pulmonary drug deposit does not decrease with increasing obstruction. Compared to powder inhalers, Respimat creates less resistance to airflow on inhalation. In addition, Respimat is an active device that requires no effort on the part of the patient to move the aerosol particles. These features make Respimat the new standard for inhalation therapy. This review aims to familiarise readers with the main features of the Respimat and the latest research findings

Assessment of dynamic inspiratory function may provide valuable information about the degree and progression of pulmonary involvement in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The aims of this study were to characterize inspiratory function and to assess the efficacy of idebenone on this pulmonary function outcome in a large and well-characterized cohort of 10-18 year-old DMD patients not taking glucocorticoid steroids (GCs) enrolled in the phase 3 randomized controlled DELOS trial. We evaluated the effect of idebenone on the highest flow generated during an inspiratory FVC maneuver (maximum inspiratory flow; VI,max(FVC)) and the ratio between the largest inspiratory flow during tidal breathing (tidal inspiratory flow; VI,max(t)) and the VI,max(FVC). The fraction of the maximum flow that is not used during tidal breathing has been termed inspiratory flow reserve (IFR). DMD patients in both treatment groups of DELOS (idebenone, n = 31; placebo: n = 33) had comparable and abnormally low VI,max(FVC) at baseline. During the study period, VI,max(FVC) further declined by -0.29 L/sec in patients on placebo (95%CI: -0.51, -0.08; P = 0.008 at week 52), whereas it remained stable in patients on idebenone (change from baseline to week 52: 0.01 L/sec; 95%CI: -0.22, 0.24; P = 0.950). The between-group difference favoring idebenone was 0.27 L/sec (P = 0.043) at week 26 and 0.30 L/sec (P = 0.061) at week 52. In addition, during the study period, IFR improved by 2.8% in patients receiving idebenone and worsened by -3.0% among patients on placebo (between-group difference 5.8% at week 52; P = 0.040). Although the clinical interpretation of these data is currently limited due to the scarcity of routine clinical practice experience with dynamic inspiratory function outcomes in DMD, these findings from a randomized controlled study nevertheless suggest that idebenone preserved inspiratory muscle function as assessed by VI,max(FVC) and IFR in patients with DMD. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:508-515. © 2016 The Authors. Pediatric Pulmonology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Adolfo Baloira,1 Araceli Abad,2 Antonia Fuster,3 Juan Luis García Rivero,4 Patricia García-Sidro,5 Eduardo Márquez-Martín,6,7 Marta Palop,8 Néstor Soler,9 JL Velasco,10 Fernando González-Torralba11 1Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain; 2Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain; 3Hospital Unvidersitario Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; 4Hospital Comarcal de Laredo, Cantabria, Spain; 5Hospital Universitario de la Plana, Castellón, Spain; 6Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; 7CIBERES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; 8Hospital de Sagunto, Valencia, Spain; 9Hospital Universitario Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; 10Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain; 11Pulmonology Section, Hospital Universitario del Tajo, Aranjuez, SpainCorrespondence: Fernando González-TorralbaPulmonology Section, Hospital Universitario del Tajo, Av. Amazonas Central, s/n, Aranjuez, 28300, Madrid, SpainTel +0034 918 01 41 00Email docbectorralba@hotmail.comBackground: Our aim was to describe: 1) lung deposition and inspiratory flow rate; 2) main characteristics of inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to analyze the features and results of inhaler devices in COPD patients. These devices included pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and a soft mist inhaler (SMI). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, as well as search strategies (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2019). In vitro and in vivo studies were included. Two reviewers selected articles, collected and analyzed data independently. Narrative searches complemented the SLR. We discussed the results of the reviews in a nominal group meeting and agreed on various general principles and recommendations.Results: The SLR included 71 articles, some were of low–moderate quality, and there was great variability regarding populations and outcomes. Lung deposition rates varied across devices: 8%– 53% for pMDIs, 7%-69% for DPIs, and 39%– 67% for the SMI. The aerosol exit velocity was high with pMDIs (more than 3 m/s), while it is much slower (0.84– 0.72 m/s) with the SMI. In general, pMDIs produce large-sized particles (1.22– 8 μm), DPIs produce medium-sized particles (1.8– 4.8 μm), and 60% of the particles reach an aerodynamic diameter < 5 μm with the SMI. All inhalation devices reach central and peripheral lung regions, but the SMI distribution pattern might be better compared with pMDIs. DPIs’ intrinsic resistance is higher than that of pMDIs and SMI, which are relatively similar and low. Depending on the DPI, the minimum flow inspiratory rate required was 30 L/min. pMDIs and SMI did not require a high inspiratory flow rate.Conclusion: Lung deposition and inspiratory flow rate are key factors when selecting an inhalation device in COPD patients.Keywords: COPD, lung deposition, inspiratory flow, inhalation devices, systematic literature review

Abstract Background Inhaler selection is important when managing respiratory conditions; a patient’s inhalation technique should be appropriate for the selected device, and patients should ideally be able to use a device successfully regardless of disease severity. The NEXThaler is a multidose dry-powder inhaler with a breath-actuated mechanism (BAM) and dose counter that activates only following inhalation, so effectively an ‘inhalation counter’. We assessed inspiratory flow through the NEXThaler in two studies and examined whether inhalation triggered the BAM. Methods The two studies were open-label, single-arm, and single visit. One study recruited patients with asthma aged ≥ 18 years; the other recruited patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) aged ≥ 40 years. All patients inhaled twice through a placebo NEXThaler. The inspiratory profile through the device was assessed for each inhalation using acoustic monitoring, with flow at and time to BAM firing, peak inspiratory flow (PIF), and total inhalation time assessed. Results A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the asthma study: 20 with controlled asthma and 20 with partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma. All patients were able to trigger the BAM, as evidenced by the inhalation counter activating on closing the device. Mean flow at BAM firing following first inhalation was 35.0 (range 16.3–52.3) L/min; mean PIF was 64.6 (35.0–123.9) L/min. A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the COPD study, with data analysed for 69 (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s 48.7% predicted [17–92%]). As with the asthma study, all patients, regardless of airflow limitation, were able to trigger the BAM. Mean flow at BAM firing following first inhalation was 41.9 (26.6–57.1) L/min; mean PIF was 68.0 (31.5–125.4) L/min. Device usability was rated highly in both studies, with 5 min sufficient to train the patients, and a click heard shortly after inhalation in all cases (providing feedback on BAM firing). Conclusions Inhalation flows triggering the BAM in the NEXThaler were similar between patients with controlled and partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma, and were similar across COPD airflow limitation. All enrolled patients were able to activate the device.

Abstract Background High inspiratory flow might damage the lungs by mechanisms not fully understood yet. We hypothesized that increasing inspiratory flow would increase lung stress, ventilation heterogeneity, and pendelluft in ARDS patients undergoing volume-controlled ventilation with constant tidal volume and that higher PEEP levels would reduce this phenomenon. Methods Ten ARDS patients were studied during protective volume-controlled ventilation. Three inspiratory flows (400, 800, and 1200 ml/s) and two PEEP levels (5 and 15 cmH2O) were applied in random order to each patient. Airway and esophageal pressures were recorded, end-inspiratory and end-expiratory holds were performed, and ventilation distribution was measured with electrical impedance tomography. Peak and plateau airway and transpulmonary pressures were recorded, together with the airway and transpulmonary pressure corresponding to the first point of zero end-inspiratory flow (P1). Ventilation heterogeneity was measured by the EIT-based global inhomogeneity (GI) index. Pendelluft was measured as the absolute difference between pixel-level inflation measured at plateau pressure minus P1. Results Plateau airway and transpulmonary pressure was not affected by inspiratory flow, while P1 increased at increasing inspiratory flow. The difference between P1 and plateau pressure was higher at higher flows at both PEEP levels (p

Background: Inhaler selection is important when managing respiratory conditions; a patient's inhalation technique should be appropriate for the selected device, and patients should ideally be able to use a device successfully regardless of disease severity. The NEXThaler is a multidose dry-powder inhaler with a breath-actuated mechanism (BAM) and dose counter that activates only following inhalation, so effectively an 'inhalation counter'. We assessed inspiratory flow through the NEXThaler in two studies and examined whether inhalation triggered the BAM.Methods: The two studies were open-label, single-arm, and single visit. One study recruited patients with asthma aged ≥ 18 years; the other recruited patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) aged ≥ 40 years. All patients inhaled twice through a placebo NEXThaler. The inspiratory profile through the device was assessed for each inhalation using acoustic monitoring, with flow at and time to BAM firing, peak inspiratory flow (PIF), and total inhalation time assessed.Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the asthma study: 20 with controlled asthma and 20 with partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma. All patients were able to trigger the BAM, as evidenced by the inhalation counter activating on closing the device. Mean flow at BAM firing following first inhalation was 35.0 (range 16.3-52.3) L/min; mean PIF was 64.6 (35.0-123.9) L/min. A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the COPD study, with data analysed for 69 (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s 48.7% predicted [17-92%]). As with the asthma study, all patients, regardless of airflow limitation, were able to trigger the BAM. Mean flow at BAM firing following first inhalation was 41.9 (26.6-57.1) L/min; mean PIF was 68.0 (31.5-125.4) L/min. Device usability was rated highly in both studies, with 5 min sufficient to train the patients, and a click heard shortly after inhalation in all cases (providing feedback on BAM firing).Conclusions: Inhalation flows triggering the BAM in the NEXThaler were similar between patients with controlled and partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma, and were similar across COPD airflow limitation. All enrolled patients were able to activate the device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyse the associations between the spirometry parameter changes in relation to laryngeal finding changes and self-reported voice and throat symptom changes among patients undergoing a histamine challenge test. Patients and Methods: Thirty adult patients with a chronic cough underwent a histamine challenge test. Videolaryngostroboscopy and voice and throat symptoms were assessed using a visual analogue scale immediately before and after the challenge test. Correlations between the relative changes in spirometry values in relation to the change in vocal fold oedema and redness and self-reported voice and throat symptom changes during the challenge test were assessed. Results: A correlation between the relative change in inspiratory and expiratory air flow values and the change in voice and throat symptoms during the histamine challenge test was found. The vocal fold oedema, visible on videolaryngostroboscopy, caused by the histamine challenge did not significantly affect the spirometry air flow values. Conclusion: The relative changes in inspiratory and expiratory air flow and voice and throat symptoms during the histamine challenge test correlated. The vocal fold oedema caused by the histamine challenge, visible on videolaryngostroboscopy, did not significantly affect the spirometry air flow values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Guidelines suggest that patients hospitalized for acute COPD exacerbations (AECOPD) are treated with short acting bronchodilators. Long acting bronchodilators, offer longer symptom relief but since they are usually administered via Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) it is considered that during AECOPD patients would not be able to achieve appropriate inspiratory flow (IF) to receive appropriate drug doses. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether patients admitted to the hospital for AECOPD, are able to achieve the necessary IF using different DPIs. Methods IF was measured daily in patients admitted for AECOPD with a portable IF meter (In-Check Oral inhaler assessment kit), containing a series of adapters that simulate the resistance of 4 DPIs [Turbuhaler (T), Breezhaler/Aerolizer (B/F), Discus (A/A/D) and Handinhaler (HH)]. Dyspnea, spirometry and arterial blood gases were also recorded daily. Results 44 consecutive patients were included in the study. The majority of patients were able to achieve an IF over 30 L/min with all four device resistances. This minimum required IF was achieved in 90.9%, 100%, 95.5% and 81.8% of patients on admission and in 100%, 100%, 97.7%, and 95.5% of patients on discharge for T, B/F, A/A/D and HH respectively. No functional characteristic was able to predict the achievement of this minimum necessary IF. Conclusion Most patients hospitalized for AECOPD, are able to receive treatment with long acting bronchodilators administered via DPIs. The possible beneficial effects of such an intervention should be tested in further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Respimat Soft Mist™ Inhaler represents a unique delivery system for respiratory medications, using an innovative concept with major technological advancements made during prototype development. The Respimat concept was driven by the intent to solve problems associated with existing inhaler devices for patient use. The following core aims were achieved: (1) avoiding propellants while reducing requirements for patient coordination and inspiratory effort; (2) optimizing drug delivery to the lungs, and; (3) improving the patients' experience of taking their inhaled medication. The Respimat inhaler is the first-marketed, pocket-sized inhaler to successfully generate a metered dose of therapeutic aerosol mist from an aqueous solution. Patient feedback has strongly influenced the evolution of the Respimat inhaler design and instructions for use. The availability of Respimat augments options for clinicians and patients seeking to choose an inhaler that can effectively and consistently deliver respiratory medication to targeted areas of the lung. In many countries worldwide, Respimat is available for the administration of tiotropium, olodaterol (and tiotropium/olodaterol in fixed-dose combination), ipratropium/fenoterol, and ipratropium/albuterol. Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]