Search

Copyright of Anatolian Clinic Journal of Medical Sciences is the property of Hayat Saglik ve Sosyal Hizmetler Vakfi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Anatolian Clinic Journal of Medical Sciences is the property of Hayat Saglik ve Sosyal Hizmetler Vakfi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Akdeniz Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bulletin of Legal Medicine / Adli Tıp Bülteni is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Amme Idaresi Dergisi is the property of Public Administration Institute for Turkey & the Middle East (TODAIE) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Savaştan çıkarak temellerini henüz atmış bir ülke olarak Türkiye, II. Dünya Savaşı sürecinde çeşitli ittifaklar ile tarafsızlığını sağlama çalışmış, savaş dışı kalma konusunda özel bir çaba göstermiştir. Buna rağmen savaşın bitimine aylar kala bu tutumundan vazgeçmiştir. Dönemin şartları itibariyle ülkeye en çok fayda sağlayabileceğine kanaat getirdiği, zafere en yakın tarafın yanında yer alan Türkiye, II. Dünya Savaşı sonrası yeni dünya düzenin kuruluş aşamasında müttefiklerle birlikte hareket etmiştir. Savaşın ardından birtakım çıkar çatışmaları ve güvensizliklerin etkisiyle Dünya, ABD merkezli Batı Bloku ve Sovyetler Birliği merkezli Doğu Bloku olmak üzere iki farklı kutba ayrılmıştır. Savaşa müttefiklerin yanında giren ve ABD’nin desteğini alarak Batı Bloku’nda yer alan Türkiye, taraf olmanın ve söz konusu tarafta tutunabilmenin bir gereği olarak demokratikleşme yolunda önemli adımlar atmıştır. Türk kamuoyundaki tartışmaların da kuşkusuz etkisiyle, söz konusu gelişmeler Türkiye’nin Batılı liberal değerleri benimseme ve içselleştirme yoluna girmesine olanak sağlamıştır. İlk etapta insan haklarının tanınması konusunda mevzuat değişikliklerine yansıyan bu gelişmeler, ilerleyen aşamalarda Türk demokrasi ve anayasal tarihini de önemli ölçüde etkilemiştir.

Copyright of OPUS Journal of Society Research is the property of OPUS - International Journal of Society Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Economic Enterprise & Business Ethics Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Istanbul Law Review / İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası is the property of Istanbul Law Review / Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Gümüshane Üniversitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Gumushane University, Faculty of Health Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Social Sciences Institute / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi is the property of Bingol University / Rectorate and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Mevzu is the property of Ali Sever and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The exercise of human rights is adversely affected by environmental degradation. Nevertheless, linking human rights to the right to a healthy environment is just one aspect of this right. The other aspect is environmental degradation, which currently does not negatively affect human rights. However, these environmental degradations may adversely affect human rights in the long term. This broader right covers ecological and ecosystem degradation, development, and protection in this context. A safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment was recognized as a fundamental human right for the first time ever on a global scale with the adoption of the UN General Assembly's resolution. There are only a few conventions that directly contain this right. However, it does not follow that other accords do not also safeguard this righ.This study aims to define the concept and ascertain to what extent the right to a healthy environment is protected by international law.

Copyright of Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Süleyman Demirel Law Review / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Public & Private International Law Bulletin is the property of Public & Private International Law Bulletin and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of ASBU Law Journal is the property of Social Sciences University of Ankara and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kastamonu University Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences Faculty / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Kastamonu University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Textbooks & Educational Materials / Uluslararası Ders Kitapları ve Eğitim Materyalleri Dergisi (IJOTEM) is the property of Bilgicagi Egitim Danismanlik ve Yayincilik Sanayi Ticaret Limited Sirketi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The peace and prosperity of societies and the better quality and efficiency of their future lives are closely related to the personal characteristics of the individuals who make up the society. The basis for individuals to have a useful, productive and respected character for society is childhood. A peaceful and happy childhood spent in accordance with child development leads to a healthy and productive adulthood. One of the most important factors in raising children and ensuring that they have a childhood suitable for child development is children's rights. According to the current law implemented in our country, every individual who has not reached the age of 18 is considered a child. What children's rights are and how much they are protected by the legal system play an important role in the child's development. There are many regulations in our Constitution and legal articles regarding children's rights, especially the child's right to life. International agreements have the value of law, and with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which Turkey is a party, children in our country are protected by religion, language, race, nationality, gender, etc. has many of the rights included in this agreement, without any discrimination. Unfortunately, juvenile delinquency has become one of the serious problems of every society because of the nature of children in need of protection, their ability to understand the meaning and importance of the acts or behaviors they have committed or will commit, and therefore they can be easily deceived. This situation is one of the most important problems in our country. In our study, juvenile delinquency, the reasons that push children to crime and the legal provisions that will be applied to them will be discussed in the context of children's rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study aims to address the debate on universalism versus relativism regarding human rights over the case of China. By the end of the Cold War and with the increasing effects of globalization dynamics, the idea of human rights had become a controversial issue, and interventions in states that violate human rights have come to the agenda of international society. United States of America and the European Union have frequently mentioned the issue of human rights violations with regard to China. However, China has emphasized that no one should intervene with it on this issue, claiming up until the 1990s in the face of these allegations that the issue was its own internal affair. Meanwhile, China has tried to open a discussion about the universality of human rights through cultural values. China focuses on Asian values, claiming that human rights are a product of the Eurocentric Western modern world. This situation can be considered a challenge of postmodern and post-colonial theories that highlight cultural relativism, regarding the mainstream theories represented by realism and liberalism within the discipline of International Relations. However, using these critical theories may reproduce existing power relations by reducing them into a cultural context. This study seeks to reexamine China's human rights understanding beyond the universalism vs. relativism debate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The book, which is the product of Rudolph Peters's long years of work, selected articles he wrote on the history of Egyptian and Islamic law, especially on the legal order and the actual application of the law. Many reviews have been written about this book, which is the fruit of nearly half-century research. So I will evaluate some points the author overlooked. Rudolph Peters starts by arguing that Islamic law is insufficient within the framework of modern human rights. He states clearly: Islamic law is not universal. There is no equality in Islamic law. Expressing that Islamic law is not universal, the author limits the application area of this law to the Islamic country. According to him, Muslims who leave the Islamic territories are not subject to sharia, and even if they commit a crime there, they will not be penalized when they return. Islamic law identified non-Muslims outside the Islamic country as enemies. So their lives and property are not under legal protection. While there are exceptions to this, the violation of protections does not entail retaliation or blood money. However, there seemed to be a fundamental disagreement over the problem between Rudolph Peters and Islamic law scholars. They divided the countries into two parts and defined the country based on Islamic principles as an Islamic country. According to this definition, other countries are an abode of war. It used to refer to countries outside the Islamic country - in today's terms - foreign countries. Muslims outside the Islamic country are also subject to the rules of Islamic law. Islamic law scholars said there is no distinction between being inside or outside the Islamic country in terms of the punishment for the crime committed. Only the Hanafis have argued that no penalty for crimes committed outside the Islamic country since there is no possibility of penalization. The absence of it outside the Islamic country does not mean crime is permissible. Acts such as murder, theft, adultery, and drinking alcohol committed outside the Islamic country are also prohibited. Rudolph Peters argues that the non-Muslims in an Islamic country have the protection of life and property. However, their legal capacity is limited. What RP expresses here is that non-muslims cannot hold public office. According to him, they cannot be the guardians of Muslims. However, there is a sharp disagreement over their legal capacity between RP and ıslamic law scholars. They point to the desire for an Islamic country in which citizens treat each other as equals. Most of the restrictions existing in social life aim to protect their interests. The most important example of this is the non-Muslims wearing their unique clothes. It is an error to consider this regulation as evidence of restriction of legal capacity. The measure was taken partly as a precaution to determine identity in middle age. There was no means to determine identity -like an identity card. Moreover, most people know that non-Muslim community leaders have made a supreme effort to preserve their traditional clothes.

İnsan, varlık bilincine sahip olan bir canlıdır. İnsan olmak bakımından nasıl bir değer taşıdığı ve bununla ilişkili olarak hangi hak ve sorumluluklara sahip olduğu soruları insanın kadim zamanlardan beri yanıt aradığı soruların başında gelmektedir. “İnsan hakları (human rights)” ifadesi bu sorgulama süreci ile doğrudan bağlantılı bir şekilde ortaya çıkmış modern kavramlardan biridir. Kavramın gelişimi itibarıyla siyasî ve seküler bir anlam çerçevesi bulunmaktadır. Ancak bugün insan hakları felsefî, ahlâkî, teolojik pek çok boyutu kapsayan geniş bir anlam alanı içerisinde tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, insan hakları kavramı Allah-insan ilişkisi bakımından incelenmiştir. Nitekim İslâm dini söz konusu olduğunda, “hak” kavramının hem ilâhî hem de beşerî çağrışımları olan geniş bir anlam içeriğine sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Kur’ân’da insan haklarının teolojik çerçevesi, Allah ile insan arasında gerçekleşen mîsâktan/ahidden hareketle çizilmektedir. Mîsâkın bir gereği olarak Allah, insana bir emanet teslim etmiş, onu halife olarak görevlendirmiş ve insanı bununla onurlandırmıştır. Bu onurlandırmanın mahiyeti, Allah’ın yasalarını yeryüzünde hâkim kılma görevi ve bunun için yeryüzünün insanın hizmetine verilmesidir. Bu şekilde varlık sahnesinde yerini aldıktan sonra, insanın sahip olduğu hakların iki boyutu vardır. Birinci boyutu insanın dünyevî-toplumsal bağlamda, insan olmak bakımından sahip olduğu haklardır. Batılı toplumların kavramsallaştırdığı insan hakları kavramı doğrudan bu boyutla ilişkilidir. İkinci boyutta ise insan hakları, insanın Allah ile ilişkisi/mükellefiyeti söz konusu edildiğinde ortaya çıkan haklar olarak dinî-mânevî bir içerik taşımaktadır. Bu haklar, dünyevî-toplumsal alanda olduğu gibi kaynağını Allah’ın insanı yaratılış bakımından mümtaz kılmasından ve insanla olan ahdinden almaktadır. İnsan hakları tartışmalarının teolojik boyutu olarak da ifade edilebilecek bu haklar kulun mükellefiyetine ilişkin haklardır. Mükellef olduğu hususlarda bilgi sahibi olması, bunlara güç yetirebilmesi (istitâat), özgür iradeyle eylemde bulunabilmesi, tüm bunların karşılığında mükâfat veya ceza alması kulun mükellefiyeti ve dinî-manevî bakımdan insan hakları konusu içine dâhil edilebilecek meseleler olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Kelâm âlimleri çoğunlukla, kulun mükellefiyeti çerçevesinde ortaya çıkan bu tür hakları, Allah’tan bağımsız ve O’na rağmen ortaya çıkan haklar olarak değil bilakis Allah’tan doğan O’nun Hak, mutlak iyi olmasının ve ilim, adalet, hikmet gibi niteliklerinin bir ifadesi olarak görmüşlerdir. Bu çalışmada insan haklarının teolojik dayanakları ele alınarak kavramı seküler bir bakış açısıyla temellendirmenin neden olduğu sınırlılıkları gidermek ve insan haklarının daha bütüncül ve kapsamlı bir metafizik temellendirmesini sunmak amaçlanmıştır.

Mülteci ve sığınmacıların haklarına ilişkin Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nde (AİHS) doğrudan düzenlemeler yer almamış olsa da AİHS, bu hakların korunması açısından en önemli sözleşmelerden biridir. 1951 Mültecilerin Hukuki Statüsüne İlişkin Cenevre Sözleşmesi’nde mültecileri geri göndermeme kuralına birtakım istisnalar getirilmişken, AİHS’de bu istisnaların olmaması, Sözleşme’ye daha geniş bir uygulama alanı sağlamaktadır. Sözleşme’yi uygulayan yargı organı Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM) ise, mültecilerin haklarını AİHS hükümleri kapsamında ele almaktadır. Türk hukukunda da Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne (AYM) bireysel başvurunun getirilmesi ve AİHM’nin ihlal kararları göz önüne alınarak düzenlenen Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu (YUKK) ile uluslararası mevzuat Türk hukukuna dahil edilmiştir. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin de kararlarında, AİHM kararlarına paralel incelemeler yaptığı ve uluslararası kuruluşlarının raporlarını esas aldığı ve uygulamacılara yol gösterdiği görülmektedir.

Copyright of Ankara Barosu Dergileri is the property of Ankara Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dokuz Eylül University Law Review is the property of Dokuz Eyluel University, Faculty of Law Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Journal of Management Cases is the property of Access Press UK and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Law & Justice Review is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study attempts to examine the impact of human rights and economic growth by utilizing two measures of economic growth for developing countries and an unbalanced data spanning from 1961-2017. The hypothesis of the study asserts that improvement in human right protection score increases economic growth in an economy. Firstly I conducted panel unit root test to see if the variables are stationary. After verifying the stationarity of variables at levels (i.e., I(0)) based on panel unit root tests, empirical estimations were conducted without the fear of potential spurious regression problem. According to the estimation results, in parallel to prior expectations, positive statistically significant effect on economic growth was identified for the variables of human right protection, physical capital investment, education investment, openness whereas negative statistically significant effect on economic growth was identified for the variable of inflation in all models estimated. Estimation results indicate that countries trying to reach to higher economic growth, besides the other determinants of economic growth, must pay attention to human right protection and implement policies that prioritizing human right protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The book, which is the product of Rudolph Peters's long years of work, selected articles he wrote on the history of Egyptian and Islamic law, especially on the legal order and the actual application of the law. Many reviews have been written about this book, which is the fruit of nearly half-century research. So I will evaluate some points the author overlooked. Rudolph Peters starts by arguing that Islamic law is insufficient within the framework of modern human rights. He states clearly: Islamic law is not universal. There is no equality in Islamic law. Expressing that Islamic law is not universal, the author limits the application area of this law to the Islamic country. According to him, Muslims who leave the Islamic territories are not subject to sharia, and even if they commit a crime there, they will not be penalized when they return. Islamic law identified non-Muslims outside the Islamic country as enemies. So their lives and property are not under legal protection. While there are exceptions to this, the violation of protections does not entail retaliation or blood money. However, there seemed to be a fundamental disagreement over the problem between Rudolph Peters and Islamic law scholars. They divided the countries into two parts and defined the country based on Islamic principles as an Islamic country. According to this definition, other countries are an abode of war. It used to refer to countries outside the Islamic country - in today's terms - foreign countries. Muslims outside the Islamic country are also subject to the rules of Islamic law. Islamic law scholars said there is no distinction between being inside or outside the Islamic country in terms of the punishment for the crime committed. Only the Hanafis have argued that no penalty for crimes committed outside the Islamic country since there is no possibility of penalization. The absence of it outside the Islamic country does not mean crime is permissible. Acts such as murder, theft, adultery, and drinking alcohol committed outside the Islamic country are also prohibited. Rudolph Peters argues that the non-Muslims in an Islamic country have the protection of life and property. However, their legal capacity is limited. What RP expresses here is that non-muslims cannot hold public office. According to him, they cannot be the guardians of Muslims. However, there is a sharp disagreement over their legal capacity between RP and ıslamic law scholars. They point to the desire for an Islamic country in which citizens treat each other as equals. Most of the restrictions existing in social life aim to protect their interests. The most important example of this is the non-Muslims wearing their unique clothes. It is an error to consider this regulation as evidence of restriction of legal capacity. The measure was taken partly as a precaution to determine identity in middle age. There was no means to determine identity -like an identity card. Moreover, most people know that non-Muslim community leaders have made a supreme effort to preserve their traditional clothes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most discussed issues in everyday life in the world and in Turkey is human victimization and animal victims from human origin. The relationship between man and animal is based on very old time. Starting from the ancient Greek, the more moderate human-animal relationship has been transformed into a problematic relationship from the first time. Starting with Aristotle and after many thinkers continued, he conducted studies and reviews on this problematic relationship. Today, studies are still being carried out and solutions are sought. The work done in this context, Taking into account the presentations of the dog news with 4 legs and tail with the high school student Mehmet Özer, who lost his life by being attacked by street animals in Kayseri Hacılar on January 4, 2019, became an increasingly social problem It aims to analyze the human-animal relationship. The news in the media after both events was examined in the study, these news are T. A. It was analyzed by Van Dijk's discourse analysis method. When the presentation of the news in the media, the images used, the titles of the parties on the subject were examined, it was seen that animal-based discourse was more dominant than human- based discourse. It has been observed that animal-based discourse is made on the basis of rights, kept on the agenda through activists, and the issue is discussed vividly on the agenda of both the people and the politicians. On the other hand, it was noticed that the news of the high school teenager did not receive as much attention in the media as the news of the dog, whose 4 legs and tail were cut. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of KADER is the property of Kelam Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Akademik Hassasiyetler is the property of Huzeyfe Suleyman Arslan and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of Research Journal of Politics, Economics & Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bulletin of Legal Medicine / Adli Tıp Bülteni is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of ASBU Law Journal is the property of Social Sciences University of Ankara and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of AURUM: Journal of Social Sciences / Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi is the property of Altinbas Universitesi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Bu çalışma kapsamında iklim değişikliği ekseninde iklim göçü ve iklim mülteciliği kavramları ele alınmaktadır. Henüz kurumsal düzenlemelerin nesnesi olmayan bu iki kavram teorik tartışmalarda kavramsal sınırların belirlenmesi, nedensellik mekanizmalarının açıklanması ve yasal çerçeveye nasıl oturtulacağı konularında değerlendirilmektedir. 1980 sonrasında iklim değişikliğine dair yayınlanan raporlar meselenin gündeme gelmesinde etkili olurken, The International Displacement Monitoring Centre gibi merkezlerin yayınladığı veriler çevresel koşullar nedeniyle göç eden insan sayısının her geçen gün arttığını göstermektedir. Bir adaptasyon stratejisi olarak değerlendirilebilecek iklim göçünün, farklı göç türlerinin bir arada görülebileceği bir araştırma alanı olarak kavramsal sınırlarının belirlenmesine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, literatür değerlendirmesi olarak gerçekleştirilen çalışmada kavramların netleştirilmesi, iklim değişikliği ve göç arasındaki nedensel ilişkilerin tartışılması, iklim mülteciliğinin hukuki çerçevedeki konumunun anlaşılması ile bunun insan hakları bağlamında temellendirilmesi ve toplumsal bir süreç olarak kapitalizm ile iklim değişikliği arasındaki bağlantının kurulması amaçlanmaktadır. İklim değişikliği ve göç arasındaki ilişkiye dair toplumsal, ekonomik ve siyasi mekanizmaların kesişimselliğinin ortaya konulduğu, iklim mülteciliğinin yalnızca deniz seviyesinin yükselmesi nedeniyle sular altında kalacak ada ülkelerinin sorunu olmadığı, aynı zamanda bunun mevcut üretim ve tüketim yapısından kaynaklandığını irdeleyen sosyolojik tartışmalara ihtiyaç olduğu savından hareketle, bu çalışmanın literatürdeki bu boşluğu dolduracağı düşünülmektedir.

The India-Bangladesh boundary is one of the most vulnerable and most problematic borders in the World. The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) tortures, abducts or opens fire on Bangladesh civilians residing around the border at every opportunity. From time to time, BSF officers enter the territory of Bangladesh illegally and break into house in villages in the border region and carry out attacks. These engagments are viewed as a major threat to Bangladesh border security and security and safety of residents in the border area. Although all neighboring countries have some sort of problems with legal or illegal crossings, practices up to the level of massacre have not been recorded. These systematic and predetermined activities of Indian officials are considered violation humane treatment according to the UN 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as other national and international regulations. In this study, security problems that constitute serious violations of human rights on the Bangladesh-India border are discussed. The leading causes of the killing of Bangladeshi citizens living in or crossing the border are by BSF officers are emphasized, and the impact of these border killings on bilateral relations is examined. Considering that the events are also serious violations of human rihgts, the possibility for an international solution is proposed unless the problem is resolved through bilateral negotiations. As the study is concerned with the practices between the two countries that are in violations of clear provisions of international law, the analyses are carried out through case study method with a specific emphasis on content analysis. Thus, despite the use of figures, the inferences are based on qualitative research method. In this regard, that the violations of law are shadowed by political relations in which India has an upper hand in every aspect is the main subject of this study. This article aims at revealing the legal bases of these violations, emphasizing constructive solutions through bilateral negotiations and thereby filling an important gap especially in the Turkish literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Academic Journal of Philosophy / Felsefi Düşün is the property of Pinhan Yayincilik and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Omer Halisdemir Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Omer Halisdemir University, Faculty of Economics & Admistrative Sciene and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kırıkkale Law Journal (KLJ) is the property of Kirikkale Law Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The responsibility of transnational corporations in terms of human rights violations occuring in their supply chains has been a significant topic of debate in recent years. It is seen that addressing liability within the framework of soft law regulations does not provide sufficient effect on preventing violations. At this stage, the role of national tort rules and the increasing number of binding due diligence regulations in the human rights liability of transnational corporations is being debated. The most comprehensive example of binding national law norms has been drafted in Germany. The Corporate Duty of Due Diligence in Supply Chains Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz-LkSG) entered into force in Germany on January 1, 2023. In this study, first of all, the liaison between transnational corporations and human rights will be briefly discussed. Then, the regulatory framework of LkSG in terms of human rights responsibility of companies will be analyzed. Finally, the civil liability of companies will be analyzed from the perspective of the recent decisions of the English courts, which tend to overcome the principle of separate legal personality in the corporate group, as well as the debates in German law. In lieu of a conclusion, the paper concludes with an assessment of the impact of the regulations and decisions on Turkish law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Selcuk Law Review / Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Selcuk Law Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ankara Barosu Dergileri is the property of Ankara Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Süleyman Demirel Law Review / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Law & Justice Review is the property of Justice Academy of Turkey and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)