Search

Purpose: Ramucirumab (RAM) is recommended as premedication with H1-receptor antagonists (H1RA) to prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs). However, RAM is a human antibody with a low incidence of IRRs. We evaluated the noninferiority of non-H1RA (dexamethasone [DEX] alone) premedication to H1RA (plus DEX) premedication in terms of IRRs in patients with gastric cancer receiving RAM plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX). Methods: This was a noninferiority, multicenter, retrospective trial conducted in three Japanese centers to assess the incidence of IRRs in patients receiving RAM plus nab-PTX for gastric cancer between 2018 and 2023. Patients with gastric cancer receiving RAM plus nab-PTX were divided into groups with and without H1RA premedication. The incidence of IRRs was compared between the two groups. Results: Ninety patients were evaluated, with non-H1RA and H1RA premedications in 43 and 47 cases, respectively. After the first dose of RAM, IRRs were not observed in either group. IRRs during the overall doses were 0% for non-H1RA premedication and 2.1% for H1RA premedication (90% confidence interval (CI): –5.6%–1.3% for each comparison). The upper limit of the 90% CI (1.3%) did not exceed the noninferiority margin (Δ) of + 10% and therefore met the noninferiority criteria. Conclusion: RAM plus nab-PTX for gastric cancer with DEX premedication may be possible without H1RA premedication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined as a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) involving the bone marrow (BM) with presence of IgM monoclonal protein, and comprises > 95% of all LPL cases. Rituximab-based regimens have been predominant in the management of WM. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a primary concern with rituximab, although it is generally better tolerated with less toxicity than conventional anticancer agents. Here, we present an autopsy case of an elderly man who died suddenly after receiving the initial infusion of rituximab for WM/LPL. Case presentation An 84-year-old man was found dead in his bedroom. He had undergone the initial intravenous rituximab infusion for progressive anemia related to Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) approximately 15 h before death. Although the protocol for rituximab administration and additional medication was considered appropriate, he exhibited several symptoms consistent with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the infusion. Autopsy revealed monotonous proliferation of small-to-medium-sized lymphocytic cells in the bone marrow, consistent with the premortem diagnosis of WM/LPL. Additionally, immunoglobulin λ-light chain-derived amyloid (ALλ) deposition was identified in all organs other than the brain. Although ALλ deposition and LPL infiltration were found in the heart, they were not severe enough to cause severe functional impairment. Severe congestion and/or edema were observed in the lungs, liver, and brain. Although significant inflammatory cell infiltration was not found in any organs, laboratory tests revealed elevated serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and the presence of IgM-λ monoclonal protein. Conclusion Acute IRRs associated with the initial rituximab infusion were the major contributing factor to his sudden unexpected death. The autopsy findings of present case suggest the necessity for thorough monitoring of older patients with WM/LPL undergoing rituximab treatment, particularly when pronounced IRRs occur during the first administration, in addition to investigating complications of WM/LPL before infusion.

Background: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined as a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) involving the bone marrow (BM) with presence of IgM monoclonal protein, and comprises > 95% of all LPL cases. Rituximab-based regimens have been predominant in the management of WM. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a primary concern with rituximab, although it is generally better tolerated with less toxicity than conventional anticancer agents. Here, we present an autopsy case of an elderly man who died suddenly after receiving the initial infusion of rituximab for WM/LPL. Case presentation: An 84-year-old man was found dead in his bedroom. He had undergone the initial intravenous rituximab infusion for progressive anemia related to Waldenström's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) approximately 15 h before death. Although the protocol for rituximab administration and additional medication was considered appropriate, he exhibited several symptoms consistent with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the infusion. Autopsy revealed monotonous proliferation of small-to-medium-sized lymphocytic cells in the bone marrow, consistent with the premortem diagnosis of WM/LPL. Additionally, immunoglobulin λ-light chain-derived amyloid (ALλ) deposition was identified in all organs other than the brain. Although ALλ deposition and LPL infiltration were found in the heart, they were not severe enough to cause severe functional impairment. Severe congestion and/or edema were observed in the lungs, liver, and brain. Although significant inflammatory cell infiltration was not found in any organs, laboratory tests revealed elevated serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and the presence of IgM-λ monoclonal protein. Conclusion: Acute IRRs associated with the initial rituximab infusion were the major contributing factor to his sudden unexpected death. The autopsy findings of present case suggest the necessity for thorough monitoring of older patients with WM/LPL undergoing rituximab treatment, particularly when pronounced IRRs occur during the first administration, in addition to investigating complications of WM/LPL before infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With the increasing use of daratumumab (DARA)‐containing regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in China, the standard infusion time of DARA is long, with the potential for infusion‐related reactions (IRRs) and increased hospitalization and use of resources. Shortening the duration of DARA infusion helps to optimize the hospital stay and enhance the patient treatment experience. The current, commonly used 90‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen may not be applicable to Chinese MM patients, and therefore, we explored a new 110‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen aimed at reducing the treatment burden on patients to guarantee therapeutic safety. Methods: MM inpatients treated with the DARA regimen were divided into two groups according to the number of times the DARA regimen was used: a standard infusion regimen for patients treated with the first two doses of DARA and a 110‐min rapid infusion regimen for patients treated with more than two doses of DARA. Anti‐allergy medications were routinely administered prior to the start of DARA infusion, patient consent, and authorization was obtained for all treatments, and statistical evaluation of the results was conducted via descriptive analyses, one‐way ANOVA and chi‐square tests. Results: A total of 129 patients were included in this study: 68 in the standard infusion group, with 121 DARA infusions, and 129 in the rapid infusion group (patients who participated in the standard infusion subsequently participated in the rapid infusion), with 738 DARA infusions. The incidence of IRRs was 27.27% (36/121) in the standard infusion group and 1.35% (10/738) in the rapid infusion group, which were significantly different (p < 0.001). The incidence of IRRs after rapid infusion in other studies was <6%. The incidence of grade 1 IRRs in the rapid infusion group was 0.81% (6/738), the incidence of grade 2 IRRs was 0.54% (4/738), and there were no IRRs above grade 3; age, sex, and underlying disease had no effect on the choice of infusion method (p > 0.05). The mean infusion time after the occurrence of IRRs was also shorter in the rapid infusion group than in the standard infusion group (F = 24.781, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The 110‐min rapid infusion DARA regimen is feasible and safe for use in Chinese MM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background With the increasing use of daratumumab (DARA)‐containing regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in China, the standard infusion time of DARA is long, with the potential for infusion‐related reactions (IRRs) and increased hospitalization and use of resources. Shortening the duration of DARA infusion helps to optimize the hospital stay and enhance the patient treatment experience. The current, commonly used 90‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen may not be applicable to Chinese MM patients, and therefore, we explored a new 110‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen aimed at reducing the treatment burden on patients to guarantee therapeutic safety. Methods MM inpatients treated with the DARA regimen were divided into two groups according to the number of times the DARA regimen was used: a standard infusion regimen for patients treated with the first two doses of DARA and a 110‐min rapid infusion regimen for patients treated with more than two doses of DARA. Anti‐allergy medications were routinely administered prior to the start of DARA infusion, patient consent, and authorization was obtained for all treatments, and statistical evaluation of the results was conducted via descriptive analyses, one‐way ANOVA and chi‐square tests. Results A total of 129 patients were included in this study: 68 in the standard infusion group, with 121 DARA infusions, and 129 in the rapid infusion group (patients who participated in the standard infusion subsequently participated in the rapid infusion), with 738 DARA infusions. The incidence of IRRs was 27.27% (36/121) in the standard infusion group and 1.35% (10/738) in the rapid infusion group, which were significantly different (p 0.05). The mean infusion time after the occurrence of IRRs was also shorter in the rapid infusion group than in the standard infusion group (F = 24.781, p

Key Clinical Message This report documents the treatment of a 41‐year‐old male with sickle cell disease (SCD) and repeated stuttering priapism using crizanlizumab, which alleviated the priapism but induced a significant vaso‐occlusive crisis during the second infusion. Encouragingly, no subsequent vaso‐occlusive crises occurred. However, the potential for infusion‐related adverse events warrants close supervision. Further research is necessary to explore its full benefits on priapism management.

Key Clinical Message: This report documents the treatment of a 41‐year‐old male with sickle cell disease (SCD) and repeated stuttering priapism using crizanlizumab, which alleviated the priapism but induced a significant vaso‐occlusive crisis during the second infusion. Encouragingly, no subsequent vaso‐occlusive crises occurred. However, the potential for infusion‐related adverse events warrants close supervision. Further research is necessary to explore its full benefits on priapism management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rituximab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has broad clinical application. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and cost of the original reference rituximab (MabThera) and its biosimilar (Riximyo). This retrospective analysis of 262 patients receiving Riximyo in the Department of Hematology of Wroclaw Medical University in Poland from the period of 1 October 2020 to 21 June 2021 focused on infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which occurred in 4,96% of patients (N = 13). 109 patients (41,6%) had previously been treated with the reference drug and 2 IRRs were reported after switching therapy. During the study period, after biosimilar introduction, the cost of rituximab decreased by 41%. Rixmyo while maintaining similar safety profile is much more cost-effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibodies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, are increasingly used in various cancers. Acute low back pain as infusion-related reaction (IRR) to monoclonal antibodies is poorly described. We report a bicentric series of 10 cases of acute low back pain due to administration of monoclonal antibodies directed against PD-1/PD-L1 for skin cancer treatment in patients treated at University Hospital Heidelberg and University Medical Center Mainz (Germany). The management of IRR symptoms was immediate interruption of infusion and analgesia leading to quick improvement and complete symptom relief in all patients. Our findings suggest that the risk of developing low back pain as IRR is depending on the concentration of the administered drug. Low back pain as IRR can be managed by early interruption of infusion and by decreasing the infusion rate or concentration in following administrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Alpha‐mannosidosis (AM), an autosomal recessive disorder caused by pathogenic biallelic variants in the MAN2B1 gene, leads to lysosomal alpha‐mannosidase deficiency and accumulation of mannose‐rich oligosaccharides. Velmanase alfa (VA), a recombinant human lysosomal alpha‐mannosidase, is the first enzyme replacement therapy for non‐neurological symptoms of AM. Previously, a potential relationship was identified between three MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups (G1, G2, and G3) and AM disease severity. In VA‐treated patients with AM, it is unknown if a relationship exists between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups, antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and infusion‐related reactions (IRRs). This pooled analysis evaluated data from 33 VA‐treated patients with AM to investigate this relationship. Overall, 10 patients were positive for ADAs, 4 of whom had treatment‐emergent ADAs (G1: 3/7 [43%]; G2: 1/17 [6%]; G3: 0/9). Treatment‐emergent ADA‐positive patients with relatively high titers (n = 2; G1: 1012 U/ml and G2: 440 U/ml) experienced mild/moderate IRRs that were well‐managed; patients with lower titers (n = 2) experienced no IRRs. Overall, changes from baseline in serum oligosaccharides and immunoglobulin G levels did not vary between ADA‐positive and ADA‐negative patients, suggesting a similar effect of VA treatment regardless of ADA status in most patients. Clinical outcomes (3MSCT and 6MWT) were also similar in most patients regardless of ADA status. While further studies are needed, these data suggest a relationship between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups and ADA development, with G1 and G2 subgroups more likely to develop ADAs and IRRs. Regardless, this study suggests that ADAs have limited effect on the clinical impact of VA in most patients with AM.

Monoclonal antibodies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, are increasingly used in various cancers. Acute low back pain as infusion-related reaction (IRR) to monoclonal antibodies is poorly described. We report a bicentric series of 10 cases of acute low back pain due to administration of monoclonal antibodies directed against PD-1/PD-L1 for skin cancer treatment in patients treated at University Hospital Heidelberg and University Medical Center Mainz (Germany). The management of IRR symptoms was immediate interruption of infusion and analgesia leading to quick improvement and complete symptom relief in all patients. Our findings suggest that the risk of developing low back pain as IRR is depending on the concentration of the administered drug. Low back pain as IRR can be managed by early interruption of infusion and by decreasing the infusion rate or concentration in following administrations.

BACKGROUND: Pertuzumab is a humanized anti-HER2/neu receptor monoclonal antibody indicated in combination with trastuzumab for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Ado-trastuzumab emtansine is a HER2-targeted antibody and microtubule inhibitor conjugate indicated for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. These monoclonal antibodies have a risk for non-immunoglobulin E-mediated infusion-related reactions during and shortly after administration. Therefore, a 30-minute observation period is required after each infusion per the prescribing information. Other anti-HER2/neu monoclonal antibodies do not have this observation requirement. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of patients who have a reaction during infusion with pertuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine and the observation time after receiving a third dose in patients who did not have a reaction after infusion of the first 2 doses of pertuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included patients who were receiving pertuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine infusions in the M Health Fairview system between October 2011 and May 2017. The reactions during infusion and within the observation time for the drug were recorded. The infusion-related reactions included fever, chills, fatigue (in combination with another symptom listed), headache, extreme physical weakness, rash, vomiting, muscle pain, and abnormal taste sensitivity. Patients were included in the analysis if they were aged >18 years and received the first 3 doses of pertuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the M Health Fairview system. RESULTS: In all, 128 patients met the inclusion criteria of receiving pertuzumab in this study. A total of 3 of the 128 patients had an infusion-related reaction during the first or second infusion of pertuzumab, leaving 125 patients for analysis. All 125 patients met the criteria for analysis, and there were no reactions during the infusion or in the observation time after receiving the third dose of pertuzumab (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-2.9%). In addition, 35 patients met the inclusion criteria for receiving ado-trastuzumab emtansine in this study. A total of 2 patients of the 35 patients had a reaction during the first infusion of ado-trastuzumab emtansine, leaving 33 patients for analysis. Of the 33 patients, 1 patient had an infusion-related reaction during the third infusion of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (3%; 95% CI, 0%-15.3%). None of the patients had a reaction during the observation time after receiving pertuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine. CONCLUSION: This review provides data showing a low risk for infusion-related reactions during the observation times after receiving pertuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine and justifies the need for a prospective trial to evaluate the necessity for observation times after patients receive these drugs. Based on these data, our institution waived all observation times for pertuzumab and observation times after the third dose and beyond for ado-trastuzumab emtansine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody that is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple myeloma and light-chain amyloidosis. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) have been reported in 28% to 56% of individuals receiving the intravenous (IV) formulation of daratumumab, necessitating slow infusions and the frequent use of rescue medications. In 2020, subcutaneous (SC) daratumumab was approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma, and randomized data suggest a lower rate of IRRs compared with IV daratumumab. Guidelines regarding postinjection monitoring with SC daratumumab are not well-established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of SC daratumumab and to suggest guidelines for monitoring patients after the administration of SC daratumumab. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included patients with multiple myeloma and/ or light-chain amyloidosis who were receiving SC daratumumab at Stanford Health Care between June 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of IRRs. The secondary outcomes include the timing and severity of IRRs based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients received SC daratumumab during the study period. Of these patients, 49 (60%) had previously received IV daratumumab (daratumumab-exposed), and 33 (40%) had never received IV daratumumab previously (daratumumab-naïve). Of the total cohort, 8 (9.8%) had an IRR. All IRRs were grade 1 (N = 5; 63%) or grade 2 (N = 3; 38%) in severity. A total of 7 (21%) patients in the daratumumab-naïve group had an IRR, and 1 (2%) patient in the daratumumab- exposed group had IRRs with the first SC dose. Among the daratumumab-naïve patients, 6 had IRRs after receiving the first SC dose and 1 had IRRs after receiving the second SC dose. Of all the patients who had IRRs, 3 patients had immediate reactions (onset <15 minutes) and 4 patients had delayed reactions (onset >4 hours) after the SC administration of daratumumab (median, 11.9 hours; range, 5-24 hours). One patient had IRRs right before the 4-hour observation was completed. Among the patients with delayed reactions, 3 had reactions after being discharged from the treatment area, but their symptoms resolved without any intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study of patients who were receiving SC daratumumab, IRRs occurred in approximately 10% of patients and were more likely after a patient received the first dose of SC daratumumab than with subsequent doses. All reactions were mild to moderate in severity and could be managed in the outpatient setting. We suggest that patients who are receiving their first dose of SC daratumumab be monitored for 1 hour after administration. Monitoring is not necessary for patients who are transitioning from IV to SC daratumumab or in patients who are receiving subsequent doses of SC daratumumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biosimilars offer cost-effective and safe treatment options both for patients and healthcare systems. CT-P10 is the first biosimilar of rituximab approved in Europe for use in all indications of originator rituximab (oRTX). This study aimed to provide real-life data on treatment changes and adverse events in patients who received oRTX or CT-P10. We retrospectively reviewed treatment-related adverse events [infusion-related reactions (IRRs), infections, hypogammaglobulinemia] in patients treated with at least one dose of oRTX (MabThera®) or CT-P10 (Truxima®) between 2020 and 2021 and had at least 6 months follow-up after rituximab infusion in a rheumatology clinic. The switches between oRTX and CT-P10 were performed according to drug availability at the hospital pharmacy at the time of infusion according to the local hospital procedure. Physicians were not involved in the decision of biosimilar selection. A total of 128 patients (CT-P10, n = 64; oRTX, n = 64) were included. CT-P10 was switched in 52 (40.6%) patients who had previously used oRTX, and 48 (37.5%) patients remained on oRTX. We demonstrated no difference between patients treated with oRTX or CT-P10 in the rates of IRRs, in which all reactions were grade 1 and 2. Comparable rates of infections (p > 0.05) and the rate of hypogammaglobulinemia (p > 0.05) were found in both groups with no significant difference. CT-P10 provides a safe treatment alternative in patients who require rituximab therapy. The rational use of biosimilars can be supported by evolving evidence on interchangeability and switching in real-life settings, which will help clinicians in decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daratumumab, a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody indicated for multiple myeloma treatment in adult patients, is associated with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs). Due to CD38 receptor presence in the lungs, many reactions present similarly to asthma or allergic rhinitis. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, has been hypothesized to reduce daratumumab IRRs due to its efficacy in treating allergic rhinitis and asthma and the presence of leukotriene receptors in the lungs. Recently published data reported daratumumab can be safely administered via rapid rate protocol that reduces infusion time from 195 min to 90 min after completion of two doses. This retrospective, observational cohort study examined 73 patients who received daratumumab in the outpatient setting between December 2015 and April 2020. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older, had an International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 diagnosis code for multiple myeloma, and received daratumumab intravenously. The primary outcome was a comparison of IRRs between those who did and did not receive montelukast. Secondary outcomes included IRR symptoms, rescue medications utilized for IRRs, and rapid rate administration outcomes. Montelukast use was associated with a lower rate of IRRs (44.4% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.044). Pulmonary IRR symptoms were more common in those who did not receive montelukast. Rapid rate administration of daratumumab did not lead to any IRRs. Adding montelukast as a pre-medication for daratumumab infusions led to a reduction in IRRs, and rapid rate administration was found to be safe after completion of two full doses of daratumumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B cell-depleting therapies such as ocrelizumab (OCR) are highly effective in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Especially at treatment start and initial infusion, infusion-related reactions (IRR) are a common adverse event. The relevance of acute changes of cell-depleting therapies on peripheral immune compartments and routine lab testing is important for clinical practice. We systematically analyzed routine blood parameters, detailed blood immunophenotyping and serum cytokine profiles in 45 MS patients starting on OCR. Blood samples were collected before and after corticosteroid premedication and directly after each OCR infusion of the first three ocrelizumab infusions. Blood B cells were rapidly depleted and accompanied only by a mild cytokine release at the first OCR infusion. Cytokine release was not significantly detectable from a third application in line with decreasing IRRs. B cell depletion was accompanied by short-lived changes in other immune cell populations in number, activation and cytokine secretion after each OCR infusion. Standard lab parameters did not show any clinically relevant changes. Our data demonstrate only mild changes during the first OCR infusion, which are not present any more during long-term treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by the presence of sickle hemoglobin that leads to chronic hemolysis and vaso-occlusive crisis. After decades of limited therapy options, crizanlizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for sickle cell-related pain crises for patients 16 years of age and above. Although rare, infusion-related reactions, including painful crises, occurred in 3% as per the package insert. However, the data on how to deal with such reactions and about further treatment outcomes are limited as most patients stopped crizanlizumab after the reaction. Herein, we report the good outcome of 13 doses of crizanlizumab in a 19-year-old female patient with sickle cell disease on hydroxyurea, despite experiencing a severe infusion-related painful crisis during the second infusion. Additional benefits of crizanlizumab, in this case, were preventing new episodes of acute chest syndrome, quitting chronic narcotics use, and a remarkable improvement in quality of life and overall performance.

The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in two healthcare centers in Quebec, Canada. The study enrolled patients with white blood cell counts ≥25.0 × 109/L who received their first rituximab dose for hematological cancer between December 2007 and May 2020. One healthcare center used asymmetrical split dosing, while the other used symmetrical split dosing. A total of 183 treatment episodes were collected from 143 patients. Among patients who received a fractionated dosing schedule, 42% developed an IRR from the first rituximab infusion compared with 50% for the standard protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; p = 0.540). No significant difference was observed in IRR severity between either groups. However, 24% of patients who received the asymmetrical protocol developed an IRR compared to 68% for the symmetrical protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; p = 0.003). These results suggest that an asymmetrical split dosing could be effective in reducing the incidence of IRR and is preferable to a symmetrical one.

Background: The antibody-mediated prevention (AMP) studies (HVTN 703/HPTN 081 and HVTN 704/HPTN 085) are harmonized phase 2b trials to assess HIV prevention efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of anti-gp120 broadly neutralizing antibody VRC01. Antibodies for other indications can elicit infusion-related reactions (IRRs), often requiring premedication and limiting their application. We report on AMP study IRRs. Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 2699 HIV-uninfected, at-risk men and transgender adults in the Americas and Switzerland (704/085) and 1924 at-risk heterosexual women in sub-Saharan Africa (703/081) were randomized 1:1:1 to VRC01 10 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, or placebo. Participants received infusions every 8 weeks (n = 10/participant) over 72 weeks, with 104 weeks of follow-up. Safety assessments were conducted before and after infusion and at noninfusion visits. A total of 40,674 infusions were administered. Results: Forty-seven participants (1.7%) experienced 49 IRRs in 704/085; 93 (4.8%) experienced 111 IRRs in 703/081 (P < 0.001). IRRs occurred more frequently in VRC01 than placebo recipients in 703/081 (P < 0.001). IRRs were associated with atopic history (P = 0.046) and with younger age (P = 0.023) in 703/081. Four clinical phenotypes of IRRs were observed: urticaria, dyspnea, dyspnea with rash, and "other." Urticaria was most prevalent, occurring in 25 (0.9%) participants in 704/085 and 41 (2.1%) participants in 703/081. Most IRRs occurred with the initial infusion and incidence diminished through the last infusion. All reactions were managed successfully without sequelae. Conclusions: IRRs in the AMP studies were uncommon, typically mild or moderate, successfully managed at the research clinic, and resolved without sequelae. Analysis is ongoing to explore potential IRR mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is the backbone of most anti-multiple myeloma (MM) regimens. To mitigate the risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), intravenous daratumumab administration requires 7 hours for the first infusion and 3.5-4 hours thereafter, thus making daratumumab-containing regimens burdensome for patients and health care resources. Preliminary data suggest that a rapid (90-minute) infusion of daratumumab is safe and does not increase IRRs. The rapid schedule was adopted by our centers since 2019. Methods: We conducted an observational multi-center, real-life study to assess the safety of rapid daratumumab infusion protocol from the third administration in relapsed MM patients receiving daratumumab alone or in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was the safety of the rapid infusion protocol, particularly in terms of IRRs. Results: A total of 134 MM patients were enrolled. IRRs occurred in 7 (5%) patients and were mostly mild (6/7 of grade 1-2), with only 1 patient experiencing a grade 3 IRR. Due to the IRRs, 5 (3.7%) patients discontinued the rapid infusions and resumed daratumumab at the standard infusion rate, while 1 patient permanently discontinued daratumumab. In 4/7 patients (57%), IRRs occurred while resuming rapid daratumumab infusions after a temporary interruption (2-4 months). No other adverse event was considered related to the rapid infusion protocol. Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the safety of rapid daratumumab infusions starting from the third administration. In case of prolonged daratumumab interruption, it is advisable to resume infusions at the standard rate (3.5 hours) before switching to the rapid infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is the backbone of most anti-multiple myeloma (MM) regimens. To mitigate the risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), intravenous daratumumab administration requires 7 hours for the first infusion and 3.5-4 hours thereafter, thus making daratumumab-containing regimens burdensome for patients and health care resources. Preliminary data suggest that a rapid (90-minute) infusion of daratumumab is safe and does not increase IRRs. The rapid schedule was adopted by our centers since 2019.MethodsWe conducted an observational multi-center, real-life study to assess the safety of rapid daratumumab infusion protocol from the third administration in relapsed MM patients receiving daratumumab alone or in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was the safety of the rapid infusion protocol, particularly in terms of IRRs.ResultsA total of 134 MM patients were enrolled. IRRs occurred in 7 (5%) patients and were mostly mild (6/7 of grade 1-2), with only 1 patient experiencing a grade 3 IRR. Due to the IRRs, 5 (3.7%) patients discontinued the rapid infusions and resumed daratumumab at the standard infusion rate, while 1 patient permanently discontinued daratumumab. In 4/7 patients (57%), IRRs occurred while resuming rapid daratumumab infusions after a temporary interruption (2-4 months). No other adverse event was considered related to the rapid infusion protocol.ConclusionsOur findings confirmed the safety of rapid daratumumab infusions starting from the third administration. In case of prolonged daratumumab interruption, it is advisable to resume infusions at the standard rate (3.5 hours) before switching to the rapid infusion.

Keywords: Follicular lymphoma; Obinutuzumab; Infusion-related reactions; Risk factors EN Follicular lymphoma Obinutuzumab Infusion-related reactions Risk factors 2795 2797 3 11/11/22 20221201 NES 221201 B Dear Editor, b The outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, has been improved since the introduction of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody. Bone marrow involvement is predictive of infusion-related reaction during rituximab administration in patients with B cell lymphoma. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Although the biological agent ustekinumab (UST) is reported to be effective for Crohn's disease (CD) in pediatric as well as adult patients, data on the efficacy and safety of UST in pediatric patients with CD are limited. Here, we describe the case of a pediatric patient who showed an allergic reaction to UST after subcutaneous (SC) maintenance injections but not immediately after initial intravenous (IV) injection.Case Presentation: A 9-year-old boy presented to our hospital with diarrhea lasting 2 years and weight loss, leading to the diagnosis of CD. After prednisolone (PSL) was tapered and discontinued, he promptly relapsed. According to our institution's protocol, we introduced the biological agent infliximab (IFX) with premedication. Coughing and vomiting was observed after the second dose of IFX and it was changed to adalimumab (ADA). However, the effect of ADA gradually disappeared after 18 months; therefore, it was discontinued and he was treated using UST. The first IV UST dose was given after administering hydrocortisone (HDC), an antiallergic and antipyretic analgesic, as premedication, and no obvious adverse reaction was observed. After 8 weeks, UST was subcutaneously injected without premedication. The patient then complained of nausea, dizziness, and headache within 15 min of UST administration. Therefore, for the third dose of UST, HDC was administered again as premedication. However, nausea, dizziness, and headache presented 10 min after UST administration, resulting in discontinuation of further UST treatment.Conclusion: Careful distinction between “true” infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and anaphylaxis or allergic reactions is necessary to determine whether biological agents can be continued after the development of “so-called” IRRs. For true IRRs, it may be possible to continue using the biological agent with appropriate premedication; however, in cases of anaphylaxis, the biological agent itself should be changed.

This retrospective study aimed to assess the characteristics and predictors of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) to rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). The medical records of adult patients with B-NHL who received their first cycle of rituximab from August 2020 to August 2022 were reviewed. IRRs were defined as any signs experienced by patients during rituximab infusion and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. During the study period, 334 patients were included; among them, 100 patients (30%) developed IRRs (mean age 54.7 (SD 13.2) years). Of the reported IRRs, 90% were grade II reactions, and 10% were grade III reactions. The multivariate analysis identified indolent lymphoma [OR 1.90, p  = 0.025], no hydrocortisone as premedication [OR 3.03, p  = 0.029], thrombocytopenia [OR 2.55, p  = 0.009], and absolute lymphocyte count ≥ 2000 lymphocytes/microL [OR 1.74, p  = 0.045] as independent predictors for IRRs.

B cell-depleting therapies such as ocrelizumab (OCR) are highly effective in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Especially at treatment start and initial infusion, infusion-related reactions (IRR) are a common adverse event. The relevance of acute changes of cell-depleting therapies on peripheral immune compartments and routine lab testing is important for clinical practice. We systematically analyzed routine blood parameters, detailed blood immunophenotyping and serum cytokine profiles in 45 MS patients starting on OCR. Blood samples were collected before and after corticosteroid premedication and directly after each OCR infusion of the first three ocrelizumab infusions. Blood B cells were rapidly depleted and accompanied only by a mild cytokine release at the first OCR infusion. Cytokine release was not significantly detectable from a third application in line with decreasing IRRs. B cell depletion was accompanied by short-lived changes in other immune cell populations in number, activation and cytokine secretion after each OCR infusion. Standard lab parameters did not show any clinically relevant changes. Our data demonstrate only mild changes during the first OCR infusion, which are not present any more during long-term treatment.

The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in two healthcare centers in Quebec, Canada. The study enrolled patients with white blood cell counts ≥25.0 × 109/L who received their first rituximab dose for hematological cancer between December 2007 and May 2020. One healthcare center used asymmetrical split dosing, while the other used symmetrical split dosing. A total of 183 treatment episodes were collected from 143 patients. Among patients who received a fractionated dosing schedule, 42% developed an IRR from the first rituximab infusion compared with 50% for the standard protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; p = 0.540). No significant difference was observed in IRR severity between either groups. However, 24% of patients who received the asymmetrical protocol developed an IRR compared to 68% for the symmetrical protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; p = 0.003). These results suggest that an asymmetrical split dosing could be effective in reducing the incidence of IRR and is preferable to a symmetrical one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-CD20 antibody treatments, such as obinutuzumab, have been associated with infusion-related reactions (IRRs). In the phase 3 iLLUMINATE study of ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, IRRs were substantially reduced with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. We prospectively analyzed inflammatory cytokines to evaluate the impact of ibrutinib on circulating cytokine levels following obinutuzumab infusion. In iLLUMINATE, ibrutinib or chlorambucil was given approximately 30-120 min before the first obinutuzumab infusion. Cytokines evaluated were IFNγ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNFα. Changes in peak cytokine levels from baseline (immediately before obinutuzumab) to post-obinutuzumab infusion were compared between arms and between patients with versus without IRRs using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Of 228 treated patients, 95 on ibrutinib-obinutuzumab (15 with IRRs, 80 without) and 88 on chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (45 with IRRs, 43 without) with cytokine data were included. Irrespective of IRR occurrence, median increase in cytokines was lower with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for all cytokines (P < 0.01) except MIP-1β. Across treatment arms, post-obinutuzumab median increase in all cytokines except MIP-1β was greater in patients with versus without IRRs (P < 0.001). IL-6 and IL-8 elevations were associated with IRRs in both treatment arms. Among patients with IRRs, those receiving ibrutinib-obinutuzumab had lower post-obinutuzumab increases in IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and MCP-1 (P < 0.04) than patients receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. For patients in the ibrutinib-treatment arm, we observed a reduction in both the rate of clinically apparent IRRs and the levels of IRR-related cytokines and chemokines. This observation supports an immunomodulatory mechanism of action for ibrutinib. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02264574. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We investigated the impact of infusion duration (30 and 60 min) on the pharmacokinetic profile of ramucirumab using a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling approach. We also assessed the relationship between infusion rate and incidence of immediate infusion-related reactions (IRRs; occurring on the day of administration) using ramucirumab phase II/III study data. Methods: The impact of different infusion durations (30 vs. 60 min) on the time-course of ramucirumab concentration profiles were evaluated using a PopPK model, established using ramucirumab pharmacokinetic data from 2522 patients. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between ramucirumab infusion rate and incidence of immediate IRRs in clinical trials. Results: Ramucirumab time-course concentration profiles were equivalent following a 30- or 60-min infusion. In the pooled clinical study dataset, 254 of 3216 (7.9%) patients receiving ramucirumab experienced at least one immediate IRR (any grade). When grouped according to infusion rate quartile, the incidence of immediate IRRs (any grade or grade ≥ 3) was similar across quartiles; findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. The risk of immediate IRRs was not found to be associated with infusion rate based on multivariate logistic analysis. Conclusion: Shortening the infusion duration of ramucirumab from 60 to 30 min has no impact on ramucirumab exposure. Analysis of trial data found no relationship between an increased risk of immediate IRRs and a faster infusion rate. Such a change in infusion duration is unlikely to affect the clinical efficacy or overall safety profile of ramucirumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trastuzumab is a vital treatment option for human epidermal growth factor 2 positive breast cancer. Since 2017, there have been 5 trastuzumab biosimilars approved for use. Despite hypotheses of infusion-related reactions among intravenous trastuzumab, subcutaneous trastuzumab, and trastuzumab biosimilars, there is minimal available literature comparing these agents. This evaluation will compare the rate of infusion-related reactions among these agents, evaluate our institution's utilization, and compare acquisition costs to determine if there is a potential cost savings by utilizing specific agents as our formulary preferred medication.We retrospectively analyzed medical records to identify the incidence of infusion-related reaction after administration of intravenous or subcutaneous trastuzumab or trastuzumab biosimilars. Additionally, we conducted a cost analysis to identify potential cost savings by switching to an alternative institutional preferred agent. Infusion chair time was calculated to identify chair time savings with subcutaneous administration.There were 183 patients included in this study. Seven patients (3.8%) experienced an infusion-related reaction. The most utilized agent within our cohort was intravenous trastuzumab. During our study period, 181 patients received intravenous infusions, which could allow for substantial infusion chair savings by switching to trastuzumab/hyaluronidase, the subcutaneous formulation. Beyond the chair time, direct drug cost savings were also identified when comparing the costs of each of the evaluated medications.Subcutaneous trastuzumab or trastuzumab biosimilars do not pose a greater risk of infusion-related reactions compared to intravenous trastuzumab and may offer more affordable treatment options for breast cancer patients who qualify for trastuzumab therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, which is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma, is associated with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions, including allergic rhinitis and anaphylactic symptoms. Daratumumab infusion follows a slow titration rate to decrease infusion-related reactions. Because the incidence of such reactions is low after the first infusion, it may be prudent to omit premedications for subsequent infusions of daratumumab. Some studies suggest decreasing the infusion time to 90 minutes. Rapid infusion can result in shorter treatment time for patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and severity of infusion-related reactions after the omission of premedications before daratumumab infusion, and to compare the incidence of infusion-related reactions in patients who received rapid infusion versus standard infusion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, amyloid light-chain amyloidosis, or light-chain deposition disease who finished at least 1 cycle of daratumumab treatment at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA, between November 2017 and December 2018. The study included a total of 57 patients, who were divided into 2 groups. Cohort 1 included 36 patients, in whom premedications were omitted per the physician's judgment after doses 3 to 5 of daratumumab (ie, the intervention group). Cohort 2 included 21 patients, who received standard premedications (ie, standard-of-care group), as defined in the prescribing information of daratumumab. RESULTS: After the first dose of daratumumab, 15 patients in cohort 1 and 8 patients in cohort 2 had infusion-related reactions. However, in subsequent doses of daratumumab, only 1 patient in cohort 1 had infusion-related reaction (ie, headache), and 2 patients in cohort 2 had infusion-related reactions (ie, itching and chills), resulting in an insignificant difference between the 2 groups (P = .5478) in infusion-related reactions after omitting premedications before the infusion of daratumumab. In addition, 12 patients in cohort 1 received rapid infusion of daratumumab after dose 5, and they all tolerated the treatment well, without any infusion-related reactions. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the practice of omitting premedications and escalating the infusion rate of daratumumab after dose 3 is safe and does not result in an increase in the rate of infusion-related reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At our institution, tacrolimus is used as a second-line agent for the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host-disease in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) unit after patients have experienced a serious or intolerable adverse event to cyclosporine. As per our standard practice, tacrolimus is administered via 2-h intermittent IV infusions (IIVs) every 12 h rather than continuous IV infusion. Shorter infusion times are cautioned due to concerns of higher rates of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and infusion-related reactions, although there is a paucity of data to support this claim. Our primary objective was to evaluate the safety of a 2-h IIV of tacrolimus in an adult HSCT population. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 104 patients who received tacrolimus by IIV (3574 doses; median = 22, range 1–158, IQR = 28) from 2002 to 2016. Primary outcomes collected include rates of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and infusion-related reactions. One (0.9%) grade 2 infusion-related reaction occurred and resolved without discontinuation of tacrolimus. Of 16 incidences (13.6%) of nephrotoxicity, all but 10 (8.5%) cases resolved. Precipitating factors for nephrotoxicity unrelated to tacrolimus were identified in all 10 cases. There were 41 incidences (35%) of neurotoxicity, of which, 8 (6.8%) were considered serious. All neurotoxicity reverted to baseline or resolved completely. We propose that a 2-h IIV of tacrolimus is a safe method of administration in the adult HSCT setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This phase II clinical trial evaluated feasibility and tolerability of 90-minute rituximab infusion and a concentration of 4 mg/mL rituximab infusion in Japanese patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Methods: Treatment was rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone. In cycle 1, rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2 (4 mg/mL) was administered at the standard infusion rate stipulated in the package insert. On confirmed tolerance of rituximab, patients received 90-minute infusion in second and subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 3 or higher infusion-related reactions during 90-minute rituximab infusion in cycle 2 of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone., Results: All 32 patients (median age 61.5 years, 16 males, 24 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) completed the prescribed six or eight cycles of treatment. One patient withdrew consent after cycle 1, and another developed grade 2 erythema and continued receiving 4 mg/mL at the standard infusion rate for cycle 2. The remaining 30 patients received 90-minute rituximab infusion; 28 (93.3%) completed cycle 2 at the scheduled infusion rate and dosage. No grade 3 or higher infusion-related reactions were associated with a concentration of 4 mg/mL rituximab dose or 90-min rituximab infusion in cycle 2. The most common infusion-related reaction symptoms were pruritus, hypertension and oropharyngeal discomfort. During the study, toxicities and adverse events were as expected, with no new safety signals., Conclusion: High-concentration dosing (4 mg/mL) and 90-minute infusion of rituximab are feasible and tolerable in Japanese patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Clinical Trial Number: JapicCTI-173 663., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background/Aim: To prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs), H1-antihistamines (H1AT) are recommended as a premedication for monoclonal antibodies, such as Ramucirumab (RAM), even though there are H1AT-related side effects, such as drowsiness and dizziness. Here, we investigated the safety of H1AT-free RAM regimens in patients with solid cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients with solid cancer receiving RAM without H1AT at Osaka Medical College Hospital between 2015 and 2019. Results: Among the 123 registered patients, 58 were identified as eligible. The total number of RAM infusions was 291, and the median number of RAM administration was 4 cycles (range=1-23 cycles). IRRs were not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Although our data are preliminary and limited, H1AT-free RAM regimens may be a treatment option for cancer patients having a significant risk of developing H1AT-related side effects. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety of H1AT-free RAM regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Neurologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis have been developed tremendously over the last two decades. Objective: The aim of this study was to review the short-, medium-, and long-term safety of alemtuzumab in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Method: This retrospective observational study (2015–2019) included all patients with highly active or rapidly progressing and aggressive RRMS who were treated with alemtuzumab at the Cabueñes University Hospital. The short-, medium-, and long-term adverse effects were evaluated following the risk management program of the European Medicines Agency. Results: 39 patients were included, 23 of them received at least two cycles of treatment. Most patients showed at least one adverse event. The following adverse reactions were reported: infusional reactions (17), urinary tract infections (six), thrombopenia (five), and thyroid dysfunction (six). Conclusion: In clinical practice alemtuzumab showed an acceptable safety profile in selected patients even if all of them suffered at least one adverse effect. Thorough and prolonged follow-up is required to further confirm the safety of this drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antithymocyte globulin is a major drug in transplantation. rATG has been successfully used to prevent graft‐versus‐host disease in allogeneic HSCT. However, its first infusion is associated with reactions ranging from simple fevers to distributive shocks and may interfere with the transplant conditioning. To evaluate the impact of rATG infusion rate on clinical tolerability, we conducted a retrospective study of all pediatric allogeneic HSCT patients who received rATG (Thymoglobulin®) as part of their conditioning at Lille University Hospital from 2003 to 2018. Until 2012, patients received rATG with a theoretical infusion time of 12 hours (12H group, n = 33). From 2012, they had a theoretical infusion time of 4 hours (4H group, n = 43). Patients from the 12H arm presented more ≥ grade 3 infusion‐related reactions at first dose (70% versus 44%, P =.027), had significantly higher fever (median of 39.6°C versus 39.2°C, P =.002), and needed a greater use of symptomatic treatments. However, they received a slightly higher first dose of rATG (median of 2.7 versus 2.3 mg/kg, P =.042). In view of these results, a rATG infusion time of 4 hours can be a relevant option for pediatric transplant centers to avoid interference with the conditioning regimen and facilitate medical surveillance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis is caused by a mutation in transthyretin (TTR) gene resulting in misfolded TTR protein accumulating as amyloid fibrils. Patisiran is a lipid nanoparticle formulation of ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi), which can reduce the production of TTR. Areas covered: In this review, the chemical property, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of patisiran were introduced. Expert Commentary: Patisiran offers a new treatment option for patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis. Patisiran can significantly reduce the TTR level and improve patient's neuropathy and quality of life. The common adverse reactions were upper respiratory tract infections and infusion-related reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by mutations in GLA gene resulting in lack of or faulty α-galactosidase A (α-GalA) enzyme. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human α-GalA enzyme (agalsidase) is the standard treatment option for FD. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs), with symptoms ranging from rigors, to fever, pain, vomiting, angioedema and diarrhea, are often seen due to immune response against the exogenous enzyme. To elucidate the mechanisms causing the IRRs in FD, eight patients who developed IRRs were investigated. All, except one, tested negative for agalsidase-specific IgE and had normal tryptase levels. Circulating dendritic cells were drastically reduced during IRRs, suggesting possible sequestration to the sites of inflammation. An increase in NK cells and a decrease in T cells were also observed. Cytokines IL-4, IL-8 and TNF-α showed a significant increase, indicating nonspecific degranulation of mast cells. All IRRs were managed successfully using a combination of standard premedications and mast cell stabilizers without any interruption of therapy. Taken together, the results indicate crosstalk between immune cells resulting in IgE-independent mast-cell-specific allergic inflammation. Mast cell stabilizers could be used to control IRRs and for safe reintroduction of agalsidase in patients previously treated with ERT.

Copyright of Der Hautarzt is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective. The aim was to evaluate the incidence of serious infusion-related reactions (SIRRs) in RA treated by non-TNF-targeted biologics. Methods. We analysed data from three independent prospective registers, namely autoimmunity and rituximab, Orencia (abatacept) and RA (ORA) and Registry RoAcTEmra (tocilizumab), promoted by the French Society of Rheumatology and including patients with RA. SIRRs were defined by an occurrence during or within 24 h of an infusion and requiring discontinuation of treatment. Characteristics of patients with SIRRs were extracted from the electronic database. Results. Among the 4145 patients, SIRRs occurred in 100 patients: 56 patients with the rituximab cohort (2.8% or 0.7/100 patient-years), 15 with the abatacept cohort (1.5% or 0.6/100 patient-years) and 29 with tocilizumab (1.9% or 1/100 patient-years). No fatal SIRR occurred. A previous mild infusion reaction to non-TNF-targeted biologics was observed in a quarter of patients with SIRRs. After pooled multivariate analysis, positive anti-CCP was associated with a higher risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.01, 6.17). Absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD tended to be associated with a higher (risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.86). Conclusion. In daily practice, SIRRs are slightly more frequent than in clinical trials and rarely life threatening. In common practice, serological status (anti-CCP positivity) and absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD increase the risk of SIRR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rituximab is a widely used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during administration. Reducing the incidence of IRRs remains problematic in hematological practices. In the present study, a novel strategy of a prednisone pretreatment regimen was designed similar to the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with the aim of exploring the effect on the incidence of IRRs to rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A prospective, randomized (1:1) and controlled study was conducted in three regional hospitals in two groups (n=44 for each group): i) A control group treated with standard R-CHOP-like regimen; and ii) a group receiving a prednisone-pretreatment, modified R-CHOP-like protocol for newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of IRRs to rituximab, as well as the association of IRRs with the efficacy of treatment. The second endpoint involved clinical outcomes. The total incidence of IRRs to rituximab in the treatment group was significantly lower compared with that in the control group (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051). The different grade incidence of IRRs was lower in the treatment group compared with that in the control group (P=0.0053). In total, 29.5% of patients (26/88) experienced >1 IRR episode. The incidence of IRRs in the pre-treatment group was decreased compared with that in the control group in the 1st cycle (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051) and 2nd cycle (6.8 vs. 27.3%; P=0.0107). The overall response rate was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were not statistically distinct between the two groups (P=0.5244 and P=0.5778, respectively). Grade ≥III toxicities mainly included vomiting and nausea (<20%), leukopenia and granulocytopenia (<20%), and alopecia (<25%). No death events were reported. Apart from IRRs to rituximab, the incidence of other adverse events was similar in both groups. The novel prednisone-pretreatment R-CHOP-like protocol in the present study significantly decreased the total and different grade incidences of IRRs to rituximab among newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number, ChiCTR2300070327; date of registration, 10 April 2023). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a major adverse event of rituximab. Objective To develop a prediction model for IRRs to rituximab among patients with B cell non- Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHL). Setting A 1000-bed university hospital in Tokyo. Methods Patients with B-NHL treated with rituximab at our institution from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Chills, fever, rash, nausea, asthenia, headache, cardiovascular symptoms, and respiratory symptoms of any grade, in association with rituximab infusion, were identified as IRRs. Risk factors for IRRs to rituximab found in the intergroup analysis were subsequently evaluated by using multivariate analysis. Main outcome measure Occurrence of IRRs to rituximab. Results A total of 140 patients with various types of B-NHL, including 74% with diffuse large Bcell lymphoma, were analysed. Among them, 55 and 85 patients were assigned to the IRR group and the non-IRR group, respectively. Indolent histological subtypes, bulky disease (>10 cm), B symptoms, higher serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentration, and bone marrow involvement were more common in the IRR group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified low-grade lymphomas [odds ratio (OR) 2.81, p = 0.017] and bulky disease (OR 2.52, p = 0.037) as independent risk factors for IRRs to rituximab. The incidence rates of IRRs to rituximab among patients with neither, one, or both of these risk factors were 26, 54, and 78%, respectively (χ2 = 16.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions A simple combination of histopathological subtype and bulkiness of disease could predict the risk of IRRs to rituximab among patients with B-NHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Carmustine (BCNU) is used in the conditioning regimens BEAM and CBV for autologous stem cell transplantation. Carmustine-related infusion reactions, while not described in the BEAM literature, occurred in 95 % of patients who received CBV. The most common symptoms include flushing, facial pain, headache, and hypotension. These reactions have been attributed to the absolute ethanol that is used in the reconstitution process or alternatively by a direct effect of carmustine. It is currently recommended that carmustine 300 mg/m2 be infused over at least 100 min (3-5 mg/m2/min). Prior to October 2014, carmustine infusions were given over 90 min but were changed to 120 min based on the above recommendation. We compared the two infusion rates in patients receiving BEAM to see if lengthening the infusion decreased the frequency of reactions.Methods: Overall, 100 patients received BCNU as part of BEAM or Zevalin BEAM and were equally divided between 90 and 120 min infusion times. The primary outcome was the incidence of infusion-related reactions which were graded based on CTCAE 4.03 descriptions of flushing and infusion-related reactions. We also evaluated the impact of premedication as well as the efficacy of medications used to treat infusion reactions.Results: Between the years 2013-2016, there were 50 patients who received BCNU over 90 min and 50 patients over 120 min. There were no significant differences observed for diagnosis, age and gender between the two groups. Twenty-eight (56 %) in the 90-min and 26 (52 %) in the 120-min infusion intervals developed a reaction (p = 0.6882). Of the patients that developed a reaction, 19 patients (67 %) in the 90-min and all 26 patients (100 %) in the 120-min infusion were given premedications predominately acetaminophen, in addition to dexamethasone. Among reacting patients, 57 % of the 90-min and 65 % of the 120-min groups received additional intervention (p = 0.53).Conclusion: Infusion reactions during high-dose BCNU are common and are not clearly reduced by modestly extending the duration of infusion or giving premedications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to compare infusion-related reactions and outcomes of using subcutaneous (subQ) alemtuzumab versus intravenous (i.v.) alemtuzumab as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantations. Outcomes include incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV)/Epstein-Barr (EBV) viremia, development of CMV disease or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, fatal infections, acute and chronic GVHD, time to engraftment, relapse rate, and survival. We conducted a retrospective study of all adult matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantations patients who received fludarabine/melphalan with subQ or i.v. alemtuzumab in combination with tacrolimus as part of their conditioning for unrelated donor transplantation at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center from January 1, 2012 to March 21, 2014. Alemtuzumab was administered at a total cumulative dose of 100 mg (divided over days −7 to −3). Forty-six patients received an unrelated donor stem cell transplantation with fludarabine/melphalan and either subQ (n = 26) or i.v. (n = 20) alemtuzumab in combination with tacrolimus. Within the evaluable population, 130 subQ and 100 i.v. alemtuzumab doses were administered. For the primary outcome, ≥grade 2 infusion-related reactions occurred in 11 (8%) versus 25 (25%) infusions in the subQ and i.v. cohorts, respectively ( P = .001). Overall, 12 injections (9%) in the subQ arm versus 26 infusions (26%) in the i.v. arm experienced an infusion-related reaction of any grade ( P = .001). There were no significant differences between the subQ and i.v. arms in rates of reactivation of CMV/EBV, development of CMV disease or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, fatal infections, acute and chronic GVHD, relapse, or survival. Subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab for GVHD prophylaxis was associated with fewer infusion-related reactions compared with i.v. administration in the SCT setting. Incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar between both arms. There was also no difference in reactivation of CMV/EBV viremia, development of CMV disease or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, fatal infections, relapse, or survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]