Search

Introduction: Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). Methods: We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model. Results: We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7 cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups. Conclusion: Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We describe a complex urgent clinical case of aortic arch aneurysm treated with a hybrid intervention with a medium-long follow-up. Case presentation: A 67-years-old man presented to the emergency room for chest pain. The computed tomography angiography (CTA) documented the presence of saccular aneurysm of the aortic arch. First stage of the hybrid intervention was performed as carotid-carotid-subclavian-bypass using 7-mm PTFE graft with ringed support. The saccular aneurysm was repaired by placing a thoracic endovascular stent graft (Gore C-TAG) with Chimney technique (cTEVAR) in the anonymous trunk (with Gore Excluder Iliac Extension) to create a suitable proximal landing zone in Zone 0. Then the procedure was completed with occlusion of the left subclavian artery by plug. Final angiography and post-operative CTA document the absence of endoleaks, patency of the Chimney and bypass. At the 4th year of follow-up with Doppler ultrsound and CTA, we unexpectedly found carotid-subclavian bypass occlusion. The patient is completely asymptomatic and apparently in excellent condition at the 8-years follow-up. The Chimney is still pervious, the prosthesis is correctly placed, and the lesion has gone through complete shrinkage. Conclusion: The hybrid treatment combined with Chimney of the arch in urgent setting provides good outcomes in the medium to long term as in this case. In the present case, mid-term patient outcome was satisfactory and the patient is asymptomatic despite the closure of the bypass.

Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection without aortic involvement is an exceptionally rare event. Nonoperative management remains the first-line therapy. However, surgical interventions can be indicated in the event of bowel ischemia. In the present report, we describe a case of complicated isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection treated with a hybrid approach.

Purpose: Comparison of hybrid and total endovascular aortic arch repair at two tertiary vascular surgery centers. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing hybrid (HG) or total endovascular (TEG) total aortic arch repair for aneurysms or dissections were included (2008–2022). Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were major complications, technical success (defined as absence of surgical conversion/mortality, high-flow endoleaks or branch/limb occlusion), clinical success (defined as absence of disabling clinical sequelae), late and aortic-related mortality/reinterventions, freedom from endoleaks, aortic diameter growth > 5 mm, graft migration and supra-aortic trunks (SAT) patency. Results: In total, 30 patients were included, 17 in HG and 13 in TEG. TEG presented shorter intervention time (240.5 vs 341 min, p = 0.01), median ICU stay (1 vs 4.5 days, p < 0.01) and median length of stay (8 vs 17.5 days, p < 0.01). No intraoperative deaths occurred. Technical success was 100%; clinical success was 70.6% in HG and 100% in TEG (p = 0.05). Thirty-day mortality was 13.3%, exclusively in HG (p = 0.11). Nine major complications occurred in 8 patients, 5 in HG and 3 in TEG (p = 0.99), among which five strokes, two in HG and three in TEG (p = 0.62). Late mortality was 38.5%, six patients in HG and four in TEG, p = 0.6. Two late aortic-related deaths occurred in HG (p = 0.9). Two aortic-related reinterventions, no graft migration or SAT occlusion was observed. Conclusions: Total endovascular repair seems to shorten operative times and provide higher clinical success compared with hybrid solutions, without significant 30-day mortality differences. The most common major complication is stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A case of a young patient with incidental bilateral internal iliac artery aneurysms and common iliac artery aneurysms is described. A staged hybrid surgical approach was performed to preserve pelvic perfusion, with bilateral stent grafts deployed into an ipsilateral anterior division branch and contralateral posterior division branch of the internal iliac arteries. One week later, an open infrarenal aorto-bi-iliac graft was performed with distal anastomoses to the previously deployed stent grafts. The findings from the present case add to the growing number of reported cases of hybrid repair of bilateral internal iliac and common iliac artery aneurysms with preservation of pelvic perfusion.

Background: Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) with a right aortic arch (RAA) and aberrant left subclavian artery (aLSCA) is a rare congenital anomaly of the aortic arch. Treatment is not well defined due to its uncommon presentation, with rupture and dissection risk rates of up to 53%. Case summary: A 54-year-old male with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypertension presented with difficulty breathing during exercise without dysphagia. Follow-up computerized tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed the presence of a RAA and aLSCA arising from the descending thoracic aorta with an adjacent 58 × 41-mm KD and tracheal and esophageal displacement. Due to the size of the KD, risk of rupture, unsuitable anatomy for total endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and high COPD burden, the patient was planned to undergo a hybrid surgical repair. Left common carotid (LCCA) artery to LSCA bypass, full aortic debranching, LSCA embolization and percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) were performed. Successful device position and exclusion of the diverticulum and aneurysmal aorta were observed after completion thoracic aortogram. 18-month follow-up CTA demonstrated patency of the LSCA to LCCA bypass graft and arch vessel branches, as well as stable exclusion of the KD. Persistence of a type II endoleak originated at the right first posterior intercostal artery has been noted and is being followed conservatively since no sac growth has occurred. Conclusion: We highlight the presence of a KD with RAA and aberrant subclavian artery, a rare congenital anatomic variation of the aortic arch with complex anatomy. Surgical planning must be individualized according to comorbidities and anatomical variations identified on imaging and 3D reconstructions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Deep femoral artery aneurysms (DFAA) are extremely rare. We treated four DFAAs with different procedures including surgical, endovascular, and hybrid surgery. The best treatment should be selected for each individual case. We report three cases of deep femoral artery aneurysms treated with different techniques. Case 1: A 69‐year‐old man with a huge deep femoral artery aneurysm underwent open reconstruction using a 6 mm expanded polytetrafluoroethylen graft. Case 2: A 67‐year‐old man presented with bilateral deep femoral artery aneurysms. The right‐sided rupture was treated with hybrid embolization, while the left aneurysm was treated by endovascular stent‐grafts deployment. Case 3: A 87‐year‐old man with a large deep femoral artery aneurysm underwent simply surgical aneurysmectomy. As there are many treatment options for deep femoral artery aneurysms, a comprehensive preoperative assessment is essential, encompassing an evaluation of symptoms, anatomy, and comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message Deep femoral artery aneurysms (DFAA) are extremely rare. We treated four DFAAs with different procedures including surgical, endovascular, and hybrid surgery. The best treatment should be selected for each individual case. Abstract We report three cases of deep femoral artery aneurysms treated with different techniques. Case 1: A 69‐year‐old man with a huge deep femoral artery aneurysm underwent open reconstruction using a 6 mm expanded polytetrafluoroethylen graft. Case 2: A 67‐year‐old man presented with bilateral deep femoral artery aneurysms. The right‐sided rupture was treated with hybrid embolization, while the left aneurysm was treated by endovascular stent‐grafts deployment. Case 3: A 87‐year‐old man with a large deep femoral artery aneurysm underwent simply surgical aneurysmectomy. As there are many treatment options for deep femoral artery aneurysms, a comprehensive preoperative assessment is essential, encompassing an evaluation of symptoms, anatomy, and comorbidities.

A 64-year-old woman had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for right coronary occlusion and the Dor procedure for a left ventricular apex aneurysm 10 years previously. A follow-up computed tomography scan showed the evolution of a giant coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) located on the proximal left circumflex artery (CX). It also revealed a previous saphenous vein graft (SVG) that was patent and located on the midline. Surgical exclusion was regarded as invasive, and isolated percutaneous intervention was unsuitable for a wide-necked CAA. Thus, a hybrid approach was planned. First, CABG (SVG-CX) via left thoracotomy was performed. Following the surgery, stent-assisted coil embolization was performed. A coronary angiogram revealed complete CAA exclusion. Many authors have reported successful repair for coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) with a percutaneous approach or surgery. Although there is no consensus for giant CAA repair, surgical repair including resection, ligation, and coronary artery bypass grafting have been recommended in previous reports. However, every decision should be tailored to suit each condition. In this case with the history of previous cardiovascular surgery, our hybrid approach was thought to be less invasive and feasible than isolated surgical or percutaneous repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES A better surgical approach for acute DeBakey type I dissection has been sought for decades. We compare operative trends, complications, reinterventions and survival after limited versus extended-classic versus modified frozen elephant trunk (mFET) repair for this condition. METHODS From 1 January 1978 to 1 January 2018, 879 patients underwent surgery for acute DeBakey type I dissection at Cleveland Clinic. Repairs were limited to the ascending aorta/hemiarch (701.79%) or extended through the arch [extended classic (88.10%) or mFET (90.10%)]. Weighted propensity score matched established comparable groups. RESULTS Among weighted propensity-matched patients, mFET repair had similar circulatory arrest times and postoperative complications to limited repair, except for postoperative renal failure, which was twice as high in the limited group [25% (n  = 19) vs 12% (n  = 9), P  =   0.006]. Lower in-hospital mortality was observed following limited compared to extended-classic repair [9.1% (n  = 7) vs 19% (n  = 16), P  =   0.03], but not after mFET repair [12% (n  = 9) vs 9.5% (n  = 8), P  =   0.6]. Extended-classic repair had higher risk of early death than limited repair (P  =   0.0005) with no difference between limited and mFET repair groups (P  =   0.9); 7-year survival following mFET repair was 89% compared to 65% after limited repair. Most reinterventions following limited or extended-classic repair underwent open reintervention. All reinterventions following mFET repair were completed endovascularly. CONCLUSIONS Without increasing in-hospital mortality or complications, less renal failure and a trend towards improved intermediate survival, mFET may be superior to limited or extended-classic repair for acute DeBakey type I dissections. mFET repair facilitates endovascular reintervention, potentially reducing future invasive reoperations and warranting continued study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additive manufacturing (AM) in general and laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) in particular are becoming increasingly important in the field of production technologies. Especially the high achievable accuracies and the great freedom in design make PBF-LB/M interesting for the manufacturing and repair of gas turbine blades. Part repair involves building AM-geometries onto an existing component. To minimise the offset between component and AM-geometry, a precise knowledge of the position of the component in the PBF-LB/M machine is mandatory. However, components cannot be inserted into the PBF-LB/M machine with repeatable accuracy, so the actual position will differ for each part. For an offset-free build-up, the actual position of the component in the PBF-LB/M machine has to be determined. In this paper, a camera-based position detection system is developed considering PBF-LB/M constraints and system requirements. This includes finding an optimal camera position considering the spatial limitations of the PBF-LB/M machine and analysing the resulting process coordinate systems. In addition, a workflow is developed to align different coordinate systems and simultaneously correct the perspective distortion in the acquired camera images. Thus, position characteristics can be determined from images by image moments. For this purpose, different image segmentation algorithms are compared. The precision of the system developed is evaluated in tests with 2D objects. A precision of up to 30μm in translational direction and an angular precision of 0.021∘ is achieved. Finally, a 3D demonstrator was built using this proposed hybrid strategy. The offset between base component and AM-geometry is determined by 3D scanning and is 69μm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background After a type A aortic dissection repair, a patent false lumen in the descending aorta is the most common situation encountered, and is a well-known risk factor for aortic growth, reinterventions and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of residual aortic dissection (RAD) at a high-volume aortic center with prospective follow-up. Methods In this prospective single-center study, all patients operated for type A aortic dissection between January 2017 and December 2022 were included. Patients without postoperative computed tomography scans or during follow-up at our center, and patients without RAD were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up for patients with RAD. The secondary endpoints were perioperative mortality, rate of distal aneurysmal evolution, location of distal aneurysmal evolution, rate of distal reinterventions, outcomes of distal reinterventions, and aortic-related death during follow-up. Results In total, 200 survivors of RAD comprised the study group. After a mean follow-up of 27.2 months (1–66), eight patients (4.0%) died and 107 (53.5%) had an aneurysmal progression. The rate of distal reintervention was 19.5% (39/200), for malperfusion syndrome in seven cases (3.5%) and aneurysmal evolution in 32 cases (16.0%). Most reinterventions occurred during the first 2 years (82.1%). Twenty-seven patients were treated for an aneurysmal evolution of RAD including aortic arch with hybrid repair in 21 cases and branched aortic arch endoprosthesis in six cases. In the hybrid repair group, there was no death, and the rate of morbidity was 28.6% (6/21) (one minor stroke, one pulmonary complication, one recurrent paralysis with complete recovery and three major bleeding events). In the branched endograft group, there was no death, no stroke, and no paraplegia. There was one case (16.7%) of carotid dissection. Complete aortic remodeling or complete FL thrombosis on the thoracic aorta was found in 18 cases (85.7%) and in five cases (83.3%) in the hybrid and branched endograft groups, respectively. Conclusions: Despite a critical course in most cases of RAD, with a high rate of aneurysmal evolution and reintervention, the long-term mortality rate remains low with a close follow-up and a multidisciplinary management in an expert center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been associated with a high risk of postoperative mortality, spinal cord ischemia, and renal failure. Endovascular repair combined with open repair in a two-staged hybrid approach has had a lower incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. In the present report, we have described single-stage hybrid repair of a complex chronic type B aortic dissection with a Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with extensive prior aortic reconstruction.

Objectives. Composite frozen elephant trunk is an increasingly popular solution for complex aortic pathologies. This review aims to compare outcomes of zone 0 type II hybrid (hybrid II) with the composite frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique in managing acute Stanford type A aortic dissections. Methods. PubMed and Embase were systematically searched using PRISMA protocol. 11 relevant studies describing the outcomes of hybrid II arch repair and FET techniques in patients with type A aortic dissection were included in the meta-analysis. The study focused on early post-operative 30-day outcomes analysing mortality, stroke, spinal cord injury, renal impairment requiring dialysis, bleeding and lung infection. Results. 1305 patients were included in the analysis – 343 receiving hybrid II repair and 962 treated with the FET. Meta-analysis of proportions showed Hybrid II was associated with less early mortality [5.0 (CI 3.1–7.8) vs 8.1 (CI 6.5–10.0) %], stroke [2.3 (CI 1.1–4.6) vs 7.0 (CI 5.5–8.8) %], spinal cord injury [2.0 (CI 0.9–4.3) vs 3.8 (CI 2.8–5.3) %], renal impairment requiring dialysis [7.9 (CI 5.5–11.2) vs 11.8 (CI 9.8–14.0) %], reoperation for bleeding [3.9 (CI 1.8–8.4) vs 10.6 (CI 8.1–13.8) %] and lung infection [14.8 (CI 10.8–20.0) vs 20.7 (CI 16.9–25.1) %]. Conclusion. Hybrid II should be considered in favour of FET technique in acute Stanford type A dissection patients who are at higher risk due to age and comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lateral abdominal wall hernias (LAWH) constitute about 1-4% of hernia surgical procedures. They represent a unique surgical challenge on account of their potential for anatomical complexity and consequent operative technical demand. Furthermore, LAWH repairs are currently not standardized, and remain contentious, despite a variety of approaches. These repairs are attendant with not insignificant morbidity and recurrence rates. We profile here our endoscopic and hybrid surgical approach to the management of LAWH and early therapeutic outcomes.Methods: A retrospective review of our hernia clinical database between March 2018 and December 2020 was performed to extract all LAWH (with and without an associated midline component) patients, who underwent an enhanced-view totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) hernia repair with a transversus abdominis release (TAR), or a hybrid repair. Initial outcome data (6-month follow-up) is profiled here. The primary outcome measures were hernia recurrence and hernia-site bulging. The secondary measures were surgical site occurrence (SSO) and hernia-related quality of life (QoL).Results: A total of 33 LAWH patients underwent an eTEP TAR or hybrid hernia repair. 11 patients had an associated midline defect and 12 were recurrent hernias. The mean hernia defect area was 84.2 ± 49 cm2 and mean mesh size was 859.6 ± 263 cm2. There was no hernia recurrence at initial follow-up of 24 months. The SSO rate was 12%. The CCS QoL scores were 34.6 ± 2 pre-operatively, and improved to 27.2 ± 4 at 6 months.Conclusions: Our endoscopic and hybrid technique is a safe, reproducible, and technically promising approach for the repair of LAWH. Thorough knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the lateral abdominal wall and advanced endosurgical skills are imperative for good outcomes. We await the long-term results of our LAWH cohort to confirm the findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Gefaesschirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) with associated Kommerell diverticulum (KD) is a rare congenital aortic disease. KD patients have a high risk of rupture, dissection, and compression of adjacent structures. Although several treatment options have been proposed (traditional surgery, hybrid operation, and endovascular intervention), a consensus regarding optimal surgical management has not yet been established. Case presentation A case of successful hybrid repair of distal aortic arch dissection aneurysm by dissecting KD and ARSA with debranching of right and left common carotid arteries, left subclavian artery, and stent grafting was presented. Conclusions The hybrid operation is suitable for elderly patients or those with high risks. Along with intervention, the hybrid operation needs to be developed as a minimally invasive method.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of frailty on the clinical outcomes of hybrid aortic arch repair with debranching of the supra-aortic arteries. Methods: Consecutive patients ≥ 75 years old who underwent hybrid aortic arch repair from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) scale, all patients with a CSHA scale score > 4 were defined as frail. The frail patients (FP) group and the non-frail patients (NFP) group were compared regarding the early and mid-term outcomes of hybrid aortic arch repair. Results: A total of 84 patients were included. The early postoperative results were not markedly different between the groups, except that the rate of transfer to a rehabilitation hospital was higher in the FP group than in the NFP group. The survival at 5 years was significantly lower in the FP group at 43.0% than in the NFP group at 67.7% (P = 0.015). However, the freedom from aorta-related death was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Frailty did not affect the short-term outcomes of hybrid aortic arch repair; however, the mid-term outcomes, including the survival, of the frail patients were significantly worse than those of the non-frail patients, mostly because of non-aorta-related causes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta remains challenging. We have reported the case of an 81-year-old woman with ascending aortic injury who underwent a life-saving hybrid repair. The patient had previously undergone extended radical mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer, which had resulted in a right thoracic wall defect and bone exposure and osteonecrosis of the sternum. Therefore, the ascending aorta was directly compressed by the sternum at the level of the brachiocephalic artery bifurcation, causing persistent bleeding from the thoracic wall. Hybrid zone 0 debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair with a left subclavian artery inflow was emergently performed and achieved hemostasis.

Purpose: Hybrid aortic arch repair in patients with chronic residual aortic dissection (RAD) is a less invasive alternative to conventional surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the short-term and long-term results of hybrid treatment for RAD after type A repair. Methods: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, all patients treated for chronic RAD with hybrid aortic arch repair were included. Indications for treatment were rapid aortic growth, aortic diameter > 55 mm, or aortic rupture. Results: Between 2009 and 2020, we performed 29 hybrid treatments for chronic RAD. Twenty-four patients were treated for complete supra-aortic debranching in zones 0 and 5 with left subclavian artery debranching alone in zone 2. There was 1 perioperative death (3.4%): The patient was treated for an aortic rupture. There was no spinal cord ischemia and 1 minor stroke (3.4%). After a median follow-up of 25.4 months (range 3-97 months), the long-term mortality was 10.3% (3/29) with no late aortic-related deaths. Twenty-seven patients (93.1%) developed FL thrombosis of the descending thoracic aorta; the rate of aneurysmal progression on thoraco-abdominal aorta was 41.4% (12/29), and the rate of aortic reintervention was 34.5% (10/29). Conclusion: In a high-volume aortic center, hybrid repair of RAD is associated with good anatomical results and a low risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, including that of patients treated in zone 0. A redo replacement of the ascending aortic segment is sometimes necessary to provide a safer proximal landing zone and reduce the risk of type 1 endoleak after TEVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hybrid aortic arch repair (HAR) has been implemented for extended aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic disease since 2012 in our institution. This study aimed to estimate the early and mid-term efficacy and safety of HAR. Materials and Methods: From 2007 to 2019, 56 patients underwent HAR for extended aortic arch disease, and 75 patients underwent total arch replacement (TAR) for arch-limited disease. HAR comprises 3 procedures: replacement of the aorta, reconstruction of all arch vessels, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) from zone 0 to the descending aorta after cardiopulmonary bypass is off in 1 stage. The type II-1 HAR procedure, in which the ascending aorta and aortic arch distal to the brachiocephalic artery are replaced, was the most frequently selected procedure (40/56 patients). The outcomes of the type II-1 HAR procedure were compared with those of TAR using the Cox regression analysis. Results: The median follow-up period was 36 months. In HAR, the operative mortality, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative permanent neurological deficits were not observed. The paraplegia rate was 1.8%. TEVAR-related complications occurred in 3 patients. Among the patients with non-ruptured atherosclerotic aortic arch aneurysm (31 type II-1 HAR patients and 36 TAR patients, the postoperative respiratory support time in those who underwent type II-1 HAR was quicker than in those who underwent TAR (p<0.01). The rate of 6 year freedom from all-cause death in type II-1 HAR (83.1%) was numerically higher than that in TAR (74.7%), and the rate of 6 year freedom from surgery-related complications in type II-1 HAR (90.3%) was numerically lower than that in TAR (96.9%) due to the occurrence of TEVAR-related complications, and the rate of 6 year freedom from reintervention to the descending thoracic aorta in type II-1 HAR (100%) seemed to be better than that in TAR (83.7%). However, Cox regression analysis did not reveal any statistical difference between the 2 procedures. Conclusions: HAR, especially the type II-1 procedure, can treat extended aortic arch disease with acceptable survival outcomes. The development of TEVAR technology will further improve the outcomes of HAR in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a genetic syndrome caused by mutations in transforming growth factor beta receptors (TGFBR) 1 and 2. It can manifest with craniofacial, musculoskeletal, cognitive abnormalities, and vascular pathologies including early onset aortic root aneurysms, extensive aortic dissections, and TAAA. Open repair is considered the gold standard treatment but carries morbidity risks, especially in patients with multiple previous aortic procedures. Endovascular treatment is associated with treatment failure when used in the native aorta, because of inherent wall weakness precluding seal. This case report adds to the available literature on hybrid treatment of LDS associated aortic pathologies. Report: This is the report of staged hybrid TAAA treatment in a 24 year old male patient with multiple previous aortic procedures via sternotomy and thoracotomy. Retrograde infrarenal aortic visceral debranching was performed using 14 mm by 7 mm bifurcated Dacron grafts. These emerged from the limbs of an 18 mm by 9 mm bifurcated Dacron graft in an aortobi-iliac reconstruction. This was followed by staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) seven days later using three endografts (26 mm–22 mm × 150 mm distal, 30 mm × 200 mm bridging, then 32 mm × 100 mm proximal). The endograft landed in an old thoracic aortic graft proximally and the new infrarenal aortic graft distally. Follow up at 11 months showed patency and no sac expansion. Conclusion: Hybrid TAAA repair was a valid treatment option in this patient with LDS and multiple previous aortic procedures. It minimised the morbidity of revision surgery and mitigated potential treatment failure by achieving an endovascular seal in surgical grafts. Short term surveillance showed no complications. Limitations to making recommendations include lack of long term follow up.

A 69-year-old woman underwent aortic root reimplantation and graft replacement of the ascending aorta 12 years ago. A pseudoaneurysm (2.5 cm × 3 cm) arising from the side branch of the ascending aortic prosthetic graft was incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. After endovascular balloon occlusion of the side branch through the left subclavian artery, the side branch was exposed via right mini-thoracotomy in the third intercostal space. After circumferential dissection, the side branch was ligated uneventfully. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 7 without any complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report a rare case of giant aortic coarctation (CoA)-related descending thoracic aneurysmal degeneration, complicated by an acute aortic dissection. Case Report: A 57-year-old man referred with acute chest pain to the emergency department. A computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a CoA with a giant post-stenotic descending thoracic aneurysm (14 cm) and a concomitant left subclavian artery (LSA) aneurysm, complicated by an acute type B aortic dissection. A single-stage hybrid procedure was planned in an urgent setting. Initially, a left common carotid-to-left subclavian artery (LCCA-LSA) bypass was performed to gain a suitable proximal landing zone, the procedure was then completed with 3 thoracic endografts and 1 aortic dissection stent through a percutaneous femoral approach. The patient was discharged in postoperative day 8th without complications; the CTA performed at 1 month demonstrated patency of supra-aortic and visceral vessels, dilation of CoA site and exclusion of the false lumen. Conclusions: CoA is a congenital malformation rarely found in adults that may represent a challenge for the surgeon, especially when combined with a complication like an acute aortic dissection. This case shows that a hybrid approach is a safe and feasible treatment option even in such complex anatomies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 32-year-old woman presented with moderate effort intolerance, hemoptysis and cyanosis.She was found to have pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVM) in the right lower lobe along with severe rheumatic calcific mitral stenosis. She underwent hybrid intervention, initially transcatheter fistula closure with CERA 24 mm Vascular Plug followed by mitral valve replacement. Her saturation normalized following intervention. She remained well in short term follow up.

Introduction: Post-operative anastomotic pseudo-aneurysms are rare but potentially lethal complications after the Bentall procedure. When symptomatic or ruptured, expedited repair is warranted, and open surgery may carry significant bleeding risk, particularly when these lesions project anteriorly. As totally endovascular techniques are frequently limited owing to hostile anatomies, complex hybrid interventions are an alternative option in such scenarios. Report: A 53 year old man with a previous Bentall procedure performed 10 years previously for DeBakey type 1 dissection was admitted with chest pain. Computed tomography angiography revealed a distal anastomotic pseudo-aneurysm. Percutaneous pseudo-aneurysm occlusion with a septal occluder plug was performed initially, with significant clinical improvement but without total sac thrombosis. The patient was discharged under strict surveillance, but six months later was re-admitted owing to hoarseness and new onset of chest pain. As the patient developed acute pain and compressive symptoms, urgent treatment was required. As the pseudo-aneurysm projected anteriorly into the posterior aspect of sternum, significantly bleeding risk was anticipated with redo sternotomy. A hybrid repair was then planned, with a full supra-aortic trunk debranching (carotid–carotid and left carotid–subclavian bypass) and zone 0 TEVAR with a single parallel graft to the brachiocephalic trunk. The patient was discharged 10 days later. Total aneurysm exclusion was achieved, with no complications reported after six months follow up. Discussion: Hybrid procedures may represent a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in symptomatic ascending aortic pseudo-aneurysms. However, long term follow up studies are required to confirm the durability of these procedures.

Objective Ventral hernia repair is a widely practiced surgical procedure worldwide. The objective of this paper is to evaluate and analyze the results of a hybrid approach for treating ventral hernias. Methods All patients with clinically and radiologically proven ventral hernia underwent hybrid laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom using a retrospective approach with the same surgical team. Large defects >10 cm, inguinal hernia, para-stomal hernia, incarcerated patients, and spigelian hernia were excluded. We utilized the laparoscopic approach for the dissection and isolation of the sac and used the port site for the delivery of mesh into the abdominal cavity. Results Our study comprises 67 patients, with 39 males (58.2%) and 28 females (41.8%). The median age in our study group was 41 years (range: 18-65 years). The median BMI was 38 kg/m 2 (range: 24-52 kg/m 2 ). The majority of the cases were umbilical or paraumbilical hernias (n = 46). The median defect size in our study was 5.4 cm (range: 2-10 cm). The median operative time was 67 minutes. We have not encountered any recurrences in this group. Conclusion This hybrid approach combines the advantages of both the open and laparoscopic approaches., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Bhatia et al.)

Background: Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) with associated Kommerell diverticulum (KD) is a rare congenital aortic disease. KD patients have a high risk of rupture, dissection, and compression of adjacent structures. Although several treatment options have been proposed (traditional surgery, hybrid operation, and endovascular intervention), a consensus regarding optimal surgical management has not yet been established.Case Presentation: A case of successful hybrid repair of distal aortic arch dissection aneurysm by dissecting KD and ARSA with debranching of right and left common carotid arteries, left subclavian artery, and stent grafting was presented.Conclusions: The hybrid operation is suitable for elderly patients or those with high risks. Along with intervention, the hybrid operation needs to be developed as a minimally invasive method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We present single‐institution results of types I and II hybrid procedures for aortic arch disease with 30‐day and long‐term results and review of the literature. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of all patients that underwent zone 0 endografting and open bypass from ascending aorta to the arch vessels at our institution between January 2013 and 2020. The following data for the systematic review were extracted from eligible studies: 30‐day/in‐hospital mortality, stroke rate, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rate, renal failure requiring dialysis, development of retrograde dissection, early (<30 days) types I and III endoleak, follow‐up length, late (>30 days) endoleak, and late (>30 days) mortality. Results: Twelve patients underwent hybrid aortic arch treatment in our institution. The most common aortic arch pathology was degenerative aortic aneurysm. The rate of retrograde dissection and SCI was 8.33%. Regarding the literature data, a total of 768 patients undergoing types I and II hybrid aortic arch debranching procedure. The pooled rate of 30‐day/in‐hospital mortality was 10.96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.21–14.06), SCI pooled rate was 2.91% (95% CI, 1.76%–4.33%), and retrograde dissection pooled rate was 3.22% (95% CI, 1.99–4.72). Conclusion: Hybrid arch techniques provide safe alternative to open repair with acceptable short‐ and midterm results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Congenital portal vein aneurysm is a rare vascular anomaly with poorly understood natural history. Whereas asymptomatic aneurysms are often managed conservatively, surgery has been used in symptomatic cases complicated by thrombosis or rupture. Surgical experience in management of portal aneurysms is restricted to case studies with limited comparative data and inconsistent reporting of outcomes. A hybrid open and endovascular approach has rarely been described in the literature. Methods: We present a case of an extrahepatic portal aneurysm which demonstrated changes on surveillance imaging concerning for early asymptomatic thrombosis. Acute thrombus was identified at the time of open aneurysm repair. We review the limited literature regarding management of portal vein aneurysms in non-cirrhotic patients. Results: Our case was complicated by intrahepatic thrombo-embolism, which necessitated hybrid thrombectomy and anticoagulant therapy. The patient remains asymptomatic at three-year follow-up with no recurrent aneurysm or thrombosis on surveillance Doppler and CT imaging. Conclusions: Altered hemodynamic appearances on Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT may warn of impending thrombosis in portal vein aneurysms. Hybrid open and endovascular surgical repair ensures vessel patency and a durable surgical result. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We present the technical description and preliminary results of a hybrid approach for the treatment of chronic total occlusions of superficial femoral artery in the setting of critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods: A retrospective analysis of selected case series was performed. A trans-popliteal hybrid technique was carried out in seven limbs (six patients). Open exposure of above-the-knee popliteal artery was performed over its maximum calcification zone. After retrograde recanalization and graft-stenting of the entire superficial femoral artery, endarterectomy of the popliteal artery was performed for debulking and widening of the distal landing zone of the endoprosthesis. The latter is included in the bovine patch suture to avoid leaving a segment untreated. Results: Technical success, haemodynamic and clinical improvement were achieved in all procedures. Median length of treated occlusion was 19.8 cm. After a mean follow-up of 12 months (range 6–26 months), the primary patency was 85.7% (only one asymptomatic occlusion occurred). There were no major cardiovascular or limb adverse events. No re-interventions were required. Conclusion: This less-invasive, one-incision technique is safe and effective for the restoration of in-line flow from groin to ankle, currently recommended in CLTI revascularization. It could be especially useful in highly calcified popliteal artery lesions, hostile groins or those at high risk of infection and in cases of vein absence for bypass surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) associated with Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) is a common congenital arch anomaly. It can be complicated by type B aortic dissection (TBAD) or aneurysmal formation at its ostium. Recently, hybrid repair with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has appeared to be more favorable. Due to the normal anatomic proximity of the ARSA to the left subclavian artery (LSA) orifice in KD, coverage of the bilateral subclavian arteries (SCAs) to obtain an adequate proximal landing zone (PLZ) is usually required, and double cervicotomy for SCA revascularization potentially increases the risk of complications.Technique: This technique was demonstrated on a 50-year-old man presenting with progressive aneurysmal formation of KD with ARSA after chronic TBAD. A 3-step technique, namely left cervical debranching with a left common carotid artery to LSA bypass graft, TEVAR, and an LSA-to-ARSA endovascular debranching with a self-expanding covered stent by a through-and-through wire from the right brachial artery to the bypass graft, was performed in a 1-stage repair to cover the primary tear of TBAD and preserve the bilateral SCAs. The postoperative course was uneventful.Conclusion: This technique can prevent complications from double cervicotomy and achieve an adequate PLZ with preservation of the bilateral SCAs for TEVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this prospective US investigational device exemption trial, we assessed the safety and 1-year clinical outcomes of the Thoraflex Hybrid device (Terumo Aortic) for the frozen elephant trunk technique to repair the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta. For the trial, which involved 12 US sites, 65 patients without rupture were recruited into the primary study group, and 9 patients were recruited into the rupture group. All patients underwent open surgical repair of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta in cases of aneurysm and/or dissection. The primary end point was freedom from major adverse events (MAE), defined as permanent stroke, permanent paraplegia/paraparesis, unanticipated aortic-related reoperation (excluding reoperation for bleeding), or all-cause mortality. In the primary study group, 2 patients were lost to follow-up at 1 year. Freedom from MAE at 1 year was 81% (51/63). Seven patients (11%) died (including 2 before 30 days or discharge), 3 patients (5%) suffered permanent stroke, and 3 (5%) developed permanent paraplegia/paraparesis. Twenty-six patients (41%) underwent planned extension procedures, including 22 endovascular procedures within a median of 122 (interquartile range, 64-156) days. In the aortic rupture group, 2 patients were lost to follow-up at 1 year. Freedom from MAE at 1 year was 71% (5/7). One patient (14%) died, 2 patients (29%) had permanent stroke, and none had permanent paraplegia/paraparesis. No extension procedures were performed in the rupture group. One-year results with the Thoraflex Hybrid device are acceptable. Long-term data are necessary to assess the durability of these repairs. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hybrid repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm comprising thoracic endovascular aortic repair and total renovisceral debranching is a feasible alternative to open repair, especially for high-risk patients. However, transperitoneal debranching is a relatively complicated procedure that requires deep dissection around vital abdominal organs. Therefore, we developed a new debranching technique called Chunnel debranching, which was characterized by transaortic tunneling using a covered stent between the target artery and the prosthetic graft anastomosed on the aneurysmal wall using an inclusion technique. This procedure increases the feasibility of renovisceral debranching with fewer dissections than conventional transperitoneal debranching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This paper reviewed clinical experiences to evaluate the feasibility of a surgical strategy for an entire shaggy aorta.Methods: Fifty-two (52) surgeries (47 men, average age 72±7 years) were performed for an entire shaggy aorta at the current institution from 2002-2017. Open surgery was performed in 30 cases, including total arch replacement in 12, extended aortic arch replacement via L-shaped thoracotomy in 10 and median sternotomy combined with left thoracotomy in two, and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement in six. Hybrid procedures were performed in 22 cases: type I hybrid arch repair in six, type II hybrid arch repair in seven and type III hybrid arch repair in nine.Results: Hospital mortality was significantly higher with a hybrid repair: surgical, one case (3%); hybrid, six cases (27%), (p=0.0125). Stroke occurred at relatively high rates in both groups: surgical, seven cases (23%); hybrid, six cases (27%) (p=0.75). Spinal cord injury was significantly higher in hybrid repair: surgical, one case (3%); hybrid, seven cases (32%), (p=0.004). Open surgery revealed a better long-term survival rate than the hybrid procedure at 5 and 10 years: surgical, 82%, 65.7%; hybrid, 53%, 35.1%, respectively (p=0.0452). The rate of freedom from aortic events was significantly better with open surgery than a hybrid procedure at 5 and 10 years: surgical, 96%, 85%; hybrid, 83%, 41.3%, respectively (p=0.0082).Conclusions: Surgery for an entire shaggy aorta was frequently associated with embolic complications such as stroke, paraplegia, renal failure, and bowel necrosis. However, open surgical repair may produce better early and late outcomes and freedom from aortic events compared with hybrid repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA), it is unclear whether it is better to perform hybrid repair in one (single) or two stages (staged). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of single vs. staged hybrid repair of TAAA. The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Databases (1 January 1994 to 11 May 2020) were searched for studies on hybrid repair of TAAA. Cohort studies and case series reporting outcomes of single and staged hybrid repair of TAAA were eligible for inclusion. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale and an 18 item tool were used to assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included post-operative complications, overall survival, and other mid term events. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. A total of 37 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The quality assessment of the included studies suggested low or moderate risk of bias. The pooled estimates for aneurysm rupture and death during stage interval were 2% (95% CI 0%–4%, I 2 = 0%) and 4% (95% CI 2%–7%, I 2 = 0%), respectively. Single repair was associated with a significantly higher 30 day risk of death when compared with patients who completed staged procedures successfully (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36–5.12, I 2 = 0%). Staged repair also had lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (single: 10%, 95% CI 5%–16%; staged: 2%, 95% CI 0%–5%) and intestinal complications (single: 15%, 95% CI 8%–25%; staged: 3%, 95% CI 1%–6%). For mid term outcomes, single and staged repair had comparable 12 month overall survival, aneurysm related mortality, rate of re-intervention, and graft patency. Two stage hybrid repair may represent a better choice for patients with controlled risk of aneurysm rupture, because it can provide lower 30 day mortality risks, MACE, and intestinal complications, as well as comparable mid term outcomes. Randomised controlled trials are needed to ascertain the effect of repair staging in patients for elective TAAA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contained rupture of an aortic aneurysm is a high-mortality condition that requires immediate repair. Open repair has been the gold standard; however, endovascular and hybrid open-endovascular repair techniques have also emerged as less invasive solutions to this vascular emergency. Here. we present a patient with a giant 14.0 cm contained rupture of a Thoracic aortic aneurysm and 7.4 cm juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm who was successfully treated with hybrid open-endovascular repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although rare, subclavian artery injuries are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, with almost two-thirds of patients dying before reaching hospital. Recent advances in technology have resulted in increasing use of endovascular therapy in management of these injuries. In this report, we present a case of a successful hybrid repair of traumatic left proximal subclavian artery transection. The employment of an Amplatzer Vascular Plug to control a short proximal subclavian artery stump and subsequent ligation of the distal segment of subclavian artery with its anastomosis to the carotid artery resulted in excellent clinical outcome without performing a sternotomy in a young patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate early and late results of hybrid repair techniques for Kommerell's diverticulum (KD). All patients who underwent hybrid repair (thoracic endovascular aortic repair + supra-aortic debranching) for KD between 2009 and 2018 were included in this retrospective multicenter study (three Italian centers). A proximal landing zone (PLZ) of at least 2 cm of healthy aorta was considered adequate for the deployment of a standard thoracic stent graft. The early end points were technical success, in-hospital mortality, and cerebrovascular events. Late outcomes included survival, reintervention, and patency of supra-aortic debranching. We used an embryogenetic anomaly based aortic arch classification for PLZ evaluation to identify the most appropriate hybrid adjunct. Sixteen patients with KD were included. According to the aforementioned classification, stent graft deployment was required in six patients (37.5%) in PLZ 0, nine patients (56.3%) in PLZ 1, and one patient (6.3%) in PLZ 2. Technical success was achieved in all patients. One patient (6.3%) died in the hospital because of posterior cerebral hemorrhage after total debranching (PLZ 0). No further cerebrovascular events were observed. One patient (6.3%) had an asymptomatic left subclavian artery-right left subclavian artery bypass occlusion and required early reintervention. The 30-day secondary patency of supra-aortic debranching was 100%. Two type II endoleaks (12.5%) were detected at 1 month through computed tomography angiography. Further transient complications were found in three cases: hemidiaphragm paralysis in one patient and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in two patients. At a mean follow-up of 48 months, four patients had died because of nonaortic reasons, and one RCCA-right subclavian artery bypass had lost its patency. None of the patients reported any growth of KD after hybrid repair. Ten patients (62.5%) showed aneurysmal sac shrinkage of at least 5 mm. Hybrid repair is confirmed to be a safe and effective approach for KD. Operative risk is associated primarily with the invasiveness of the hybrid adjunct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aim was to study the outcomes of hybrid debranching endovascular aortic repair (H-EVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Patients and methods Patients who had H-EVAR for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. Early outcome (30 days) in terms of mortality, morbidity, and target vessel patency were analyzed. Follow-up outcomes in terms of late death, endoleak, and re-intervention rates were evaluated. Results A total of 33 patients (48% males) with a mean age of 68±13 years were included. Eighteen (55%) patients were asymptomatic, whereas eight (24%) patients were symptomatic and seven (21%) patients had a contained rupture. Six (18%) patients died after the visceral debranching operation (stage 1), and 27 (82%) patients completed both stages of H-EVAR. The 30-day mortality in completed H-EVAR was 5 (19%) of 27 patients. Five (15%) patients developed spinal cord ischemia. Four (12%) patients had post-operative dialysis. Two (6%) patients had a stroke. Four (12%) patients experienced respiratory failure. Four (12%) patients had mesenteric ischemia and two (6%) had ischemic colitis. The 30-day overall primary target vessel patency rate was 92±3%. Early endoleak I rate was 3 (11%) of 27 patients, and endoleak III rate was 2 (7%) of 27 patients (completed H-EVAR). The mean follow-up period was 23±11 months for 22 patients who survived the completed H-EVAR. Late death occurred in 4 (18%) of 22 patients. Conclusion Hybrid EVAR had several advantages that included avoiding thoracotomy, aortic cross-clamping, single-lung ventilation, and the need for extensive dissection in multiple aortic segments. However, the controversial outcomes led to criticism, and there is a need to examine the three techniques (open, hybrid, and total endovascular) simultaneously, which would give a unique definition of the selection criteria to achieve the optimum results in each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open repair of extent II and III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) is associated with substantial morbidity. Alternative strategies, such as hybrid operations combining proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair with either staged open distal TAAA repair or visceral debranching (hybrid), as well as fenestrated/branched endografts (FEVAR), have been increasingly reported; however, benefits of these approaches compared with direct open surgery remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of these three different strategies in the management of extent II/III TAAA. All extent II/III TAAA repairs (2002-2018) for nonmycotic, degenerative aneurysm or chronic dissection at a single institution were reviewed. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. Secondary end points included incidence of spinal cord ischemia (SCI), complications, unplanned re-operation, 90-day readmission, and out-of-hospital survival. To mitigate impact of covariate imbalance and selection bias, intergroup comparisons were made using inverse probability weighted-propensity analysis. Cox regression was used to estimate survival while cumulative incidence was used to determine reoperation risk. One hundred ninety-eight patients (FEVAR, 92; hybrid, 40; open, 66) underwent repair. In unadjusted analysis, compared with hybrid/open patients, FEVAR patients were significantly older with more cardiovascular risk factors, but less likely to have a connective tissue disorder or dissection-related indication. Unadjusted 30-day mortality and complication rates were: 30-day mortality, FEVAR 4%, hybrid 13%, open 12% (P =.01); and complications, FEVAR 36%, hybrid 33%, open 50% (P =.11). Permanent SCI was not different among groups (FEVAR 3%, hybrid 3%, open 6%; P =.64). In adjusted analysis, 30-day mortality risk was greater for open vs FEVAR (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-9.2; P =.01) with no difference for hybrid vs open/FEVAR. There was significantly lower risk of any SCI for open vs FEVAR (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.96; P =.04); however, no difference in risk of permanent SCI was detected among the three groups. There was no difference in complications or unplanned reoperation, but open patients had the greatest risk of unplanned 90-day readmission. There was a time-varying effect on survival probability, with open repair having a significant survival disadvantage in the first 1 to 6 months after the procedure compared with hybrid/FEVAR patients (Cox model P =.03), but no difference in survival at 1 and 5 years (1- and 5-year survival: FEVAR, 86 ± 3%, 55 ± 8%; hybrid, 86 ± 5%, 60 ± 11%; open 69 ± 7%, 59 ± 8%; Cox-model P =.10). Extent II/III TAAA repair, regardless of operative strategy, is associated with significant morbidity risk. FEVAR is associated with the lowest 30-day mortality risk compared with hybrid and open repair when estimates are adjusted for preoperative risk factors. These data support greater adoption of FEVAR as first-line therapy to treat complex TAAA disease in anatomically suitable patients who present electively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms present across a spectrum of anatomic variants that can pose unique operative challenges. A wide variety of procedural approaches have been described in the literature with current therapeutic options including both open and endovascular repair. These techniques may involve either ligation or embolization of the internal iliac artery (IIA) with reliance on collateralized blood flow to the pelvis to mitigate postoperative complications. However, preservation of the IIA is often preferred. This case report describes a hybrid surgical approach for treating CIA aneurysms while preserving IIA perfusion. Our technique mitigates the risks of hypogastric artery dissection (including hypogastric vein injury) in the presence of a large CIA aneurysm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]