Search

Background: Chest pain is a prevalent reason for emergency room referrals and presents diagnostic challenges. The physician must carefully differentiate between cardiac and noncardiac causes, including various vascular and extracardiovascular conditions. However, it is crucial not to overlook serious conditions such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and early discharge management become difficult when traditional clinical criteria, ECG, and troponin values are insufficient. Recently, the focus has shifted to a "multi-marker" approach to improve diagnostic accuracy and prognosis in patients with chest pain. Methods: This observational, prospective, single-center study involved, with informed consent, 360 patients presenting to the emergency department with typical chest pain and included a control group of 120 healthy subjects. In addition to routine examinations, including tests for hsTnI (Siemens TNIH kit), according to the 0–1 h algorithm, biochemical markers sST2 (tumorigenicity suppression-2) and suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) were also evaluated for each patient. A 12-month follow-up was conducted to monitor outcomes and adverse events. Results: We identified two groups of patients: a positive one (112 patients) with high levels of hsTnI, sST2 > 24.19 ng/mL, and suPAR > 2.9 ng/mL, diagnosed with ACS; and a negative one (136 patients) with low levels of hsTnI, suPAR < 2.9 ng/mL, and sST2 < 24.19 ng/mL. During the 12-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the negative group. In the intermediate group, patients with hsTnI between 6 ng/L and the ischemic limit, sST2 > 29.1 ng/mL and suPAR > 2.9 ng/mL, showed the highest probability of adverse events during follow-up, while those with sST2 < 24.19 ng/mL and suPAR < 2.9 ng/mL had a better outcome with no adverse events at 12 months. Conclusion: Our data suggest that sST2 and suPAR, together with hsTnI, may be useful in the prognosis of cardiovascular patients with ACS, providing additional information on endothelial damage. These biomarkers could guide the clinical decision on further diagnostic investigations. In addition, suPAR and sST2 emerge as promising for event prediction in patients with chest pain. Their integration into the standard approach in PS could facilitate more efficient patient management, allowing safe release or timely admission based on individual risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives To investigate the association between radiotherapy (RT) and cardiac biomarkers in women with left-sided breast cancer. Methods This prospective observational study recruited patients with stage I-III left-sided breast cancer without coronary heart disease who required adjuvant RT. High-sensitivity troponin I(hsTnI), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hsCRP) levels were measured pre-RT, immediately after RT, and 3 months post-RT. Cardiac-sparing RT techniques were utilized (Field-in-Field IMRT/VMAT ± voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold). Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests and multivariable quantile regression (QR). Results One hundred five patients completed the study, with 63 evaluable at three months post-RT. Pre- and post-RT biomarkers showed no significant differences. Median pre-RT and post-RT values were: hsTnI (0.012ng/mL; 0.012ng/mL), hsCRP (3.1 mg/L; 2.8 mg/L), and NT-proBNP (59pg/mL; 45pg/mL). Three months post-RT, hsTnI, hsCRP and NT-proBNP levels also showed no significant differences. Multivariable QR revealed no association between heart Dmean [median(IQR): 2.87 Gy (2.05–3.94)] and post-RT biomarkers. Age and BMI were associated with hsCRP and NT-proBNP, respectively. Conclusions hsTnI, NT-proBNP, and hsCRP are not correlated with contemporary low cardiac exposure in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with contemporary RT techniques.

Abstract Background Although some emergency department risk stratification tools consider non‐specific ECG findings as an aid in disposition decisions, their clinical value in patients with an initially low high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) is unclear. Objective Our purpose was to determine if non‐specific ECG (ns‐ECG) findings are associated with 30‐day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ED patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who have a low initial hsTnI. Methods Using the prospective Siemens Atellica hsTnI Food and Drug Administration submission observational database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of the association between ns‐ECG findings (defined as left bundle branch block [LBBB], ST depression [STD], or T‐wave inversions [TWI]) and 30‐day MACE (death, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, or coronary revascularization). Eligible patients presented with suspected ACS to one of 29 US EDs from April 2015 to April 2016, had stable vital signs, a blood sample for hsTnI (Siemen's Atellica, Siemens Healthineers, Inc, Malvern, PA) obtained at 1, 3, and 6 hours after ED presentation, and were followed for 30 days. The relationship between 30‐day outcome, initial hsTnI, and ns‐ECG was evaluated using chi‐square testing. Results Of 2676 enrolled, 1313 patients met the inclusion criteria and are included in the analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 years (54, 72), 54% were male, with 56% white, and 39% African American. Median (interquartile range) times from symptom onset to presentation and presentation to specimen collection were 92 (0, 216) and 146 (117, 177) minutes, respectively. The most common presenting symptoms were chest pain (84%), followed by dyspnea (9%). ECG findings were categorized as T‐wave inversion or non‐specific T wave changes (42%), ST depression ns‐ECG ST changes (16%), or LBBB (2%). Thirty‐day MACE occurred in 72 (5.5%) patients, with coronary revascularization (35 patients, 2.7%) and heart failure (25 patients, 1.9%) being the most frequent outcomes. In patients with an initial hsTnI below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 2.5 ng/L (n = 449), there was no association between ns‐ECG changes and 30‐day MACE (P = 0.42). If the hsTnI was ≥LOQ (2.5 ng/L), there were increased rates of 30‐day MACE and ns‐ECG findings (P = 0.01). Conclusion In ED suspected ACS patients without unstable vital signs, and an initial hsTnI less than the LOQ (2.5 ng/L), ns‐ECG findings are not associated with 30‐day major adverse cardiac events. The use of ns‐ECG findings in ACS disposition should be considered in the context of hsTnI levels.

The limitation of echocardiography to measure chemotherapy cardiotoxicity at left locally advanced breast cancer with large ulcer is still serious problem. HsTnI and erCRP are biomarkers to detect cardiotoxicity that are cheap, easy to examine and available at Dr.Soetomo Hospital Surabaya. This study was to compare HsTnI, erCRP and echocardiography as cardiotoxicity predictors in locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant CAF therapy. This study used one group pretest and posttest design among 23 locally advanced breast cancer patients. All patients underwent echocardiography, HsTnI, and erCRP examinations before and after 3 times chemotherapy and compared. The average age was 49.78±8.7. Statistically significant decrease in LVEF was found after treatment (67.98%±4.06 and 64.07%±3.53, p=0.000). HsTnI was significantly increased after treatment (0.007 µg/mL±0.004 and 0.043 µg/mL±0.051 p=0.000). erCRP was significantly decreased after treatment (1.043mg/dL±0.913 and 0.573mg/dL±0.444 p=0.044). Decreased LVEF and increased HsTnI was compared by its cardiotoxic cut-off. HsTnI was significantly better and faster to detect cardiotoxicity (0.033±0.051 p=0.002). In conclusion, strong correlation is present in the detection of cardiotoxicity between HsTnI and LVEF. HsTnI is faster than echocardiography, and could be alternative diagnostic to detect early cardiotoxicity.

Infectious diseases are disorders caused by microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, parasites or fungi. According to the World Health Organization, infectious diseases cause about 26% of the world's deaths and are the leading cause of death in people younger than 50 years old. Infectious diseases are classified into: new infectious diseases which include SARS-1, SARS-2, bird flu, etc. and recurrent diseases, which include pre-existing infections with known incidence and geographical spread. Coronaviruses are a family of viruses widely found in animals and humans, responsible for a variety of diseases, ranging from common cold to much more severe diseases which often lead to pneumonia. The group of new diseases also includes Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), which initially causes a respiratory infection with the continuation of other complications. This virus is a new type of beta-coronavirus, which first appeared in China and later spread very fast all over the world leading to a global pandemic. Disease monitoring should primarily include erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leukocyte count, leukocyte formula. C-reactive protein (CRP), determination of Troponin I (hsTnI) and T (cTnT, pro-B type N-terminal natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Multiple biomarkers have been independently and additively associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the prognostic value of suPAR (soluble urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor) and hsTnI (high‐sensitivity troponin I) levels in symptomatic patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that high levels of these biomarkers will be associated with the risk of future adverse outcomes. Methods and Results Plasma levels of suPAR and hsTnI were measured in 556 symptomatic patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease. A biomarker risk score was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers above the median in this cohort (suPAR>2523 pg/mL and hsTnI>2.7 pg/mL). Survival analyses were performed with models adjusted for traditional risk factors. All‐cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure) served as clinical outcomes over a median follow‐up of 6.2 years. Mean age was 57±10 years, 49% of the cohort patients were female, and 68% had a positive stress test. High suPAR and hsTnI levels were independent predictors of all‐cause death (hazard ratio=3.2 [95% CI, 1.8–5.7] and 1.3 [95% CI, 1.0–1.7], respectively; both P

The limitation of echocardiography to measure chemotherapy cardiotoxicity at left locally advanced breast cancer with large ulcer is still serious problem. HsTnI and erCRP are biomarkers to detect cardiotoxicity that are cheap, easy to examine and available at Dr.Soetomo Hospital Surabaya. This study was to compare HsTnI, erCRP and echocardiography as cardiotoxicity predictors in locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant CAF therapy. This study used one-group pretest and posttest design among 23 locally advanced breast cancer patients. All patients underwent echocardiography, HsTnI, and erCRP examinations before and after 3 times chemotherapy and compared. The average age was 49.78±8.7. Statistically significant decrease in LVEF was found after treatment (67.98%±4.06 and 64.07%±3.53, p=0.000). HsTnI was significantly increased after treatment (0.007 µg/mL±0.004 and 0.043 µg/mL±0.051 p=0.000). erCRP was significantly decreased after treatment (1.043mg/dL±0.913 and 0.573mg/dL±0.444 p=0.044). Decreased LVEF and increased HsTnI was compared by its cardiotoxic cut-off. HsTnI was significantly better and faster to detect cardiotoxicity (0.033±0.051 p=0.002). In conclusion, strong correlation is present in the detection of cardiotoxicity between HsTnI and LVEF. HsTnI is faster than echocardiography, and could be alternative diagnostic to detect early cardiotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early detecting AMI in individuals presenting to the ED with chest pain continues to be a challenge. cTn is the gold standard for AMI diagnosis but early presenters (<1 hours from symptom onset) maybe cTn negative on admission. We analysed the diagnostic value of h-FABP and hs-TnI in patients presenting to ED with chest pain and no cTnI elevations.Methods: 28 AMI and 28 no-AMI individuals both presented to ED within one hour from pain onset were included. Blood donors were analysed for h-FABP cut-off identification. Among AMI patients, 55% were positive for h-FABP and 34.6% were positive for hs-TnI (p = .015), thus 21% were positive only for h-FABP. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by ROC curve. h-FABP showed a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than hs-TnI.Conclusions: In our study, the frequency of h-FABP positivity among AMI patients was higher than that of hs-TnI, which would have missed six of them; however, hs-TnI AUC was superior to that of h-FABP. These preliminary findings might confirm that h-FABP may be a good candidate for AMI rule-in/rule-out within the ED context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aims of this study were to determine plasma elevations of biomarkers of myocardial injury associated with transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to evaluate their prognostic value. Background Increases in biomarkers of myocardial injury are a common finding after TAVR, but their clinical significance is unclear. Methods In 756 consecutive TF TAVR patients, cardiac high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) levels were measured at pre-defined time points to assess the occurrence of myocardial injury (defined as 15 times the upper reference limit for hsTnI [≥1.5 ng/ml] or 5 times the upper reference limit for CK-MB [≥18 μg/l]) during the first 72 h. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Results After uneventful TF TAVR, hsTnI was elevated in 51.6% and CK-MB in 7.4% of patients, respectively. Myocardial injury was associated with transcatheter heart valve (THV) type: patients who received the LOTUS THV more frequently had myocardial injury compared with those who received other THVs (LOTUS, 81.6%; Direct Flow Medical, 56.4%; CoreValve, 51.2%; Evolut R, 42.7%; SAPIEN XT, 40.4%; SAPIEN 3, 36.6%; p < 0.001). Myocardial injury defined by hsTnI was not associated with adverse outcomes at 30 days (3.1% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.778) or 1 year (16.7% vs. 17.2%; p = 0.841). Likewise, a CK-MB increase was not associated with 30-day mortality (5.5% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.258) or 1-year mortality (16.4% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.856). Conclusions Myocardial injury is common following TF TAVR. The extent of cardiac biomarker elevation depends on THV type but is not associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes after uneventful TAVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significant advances have been made in detecting cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction with serum biomarkers, cardiovascular MRI, echocardiography and multi-modality approaches. Serum biomarkers, notably cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides, have been evaluated for their prognostic ability in predicting left ventricular dysfunction. Imaging modalities, such as cardiovascular MRI and echocardiography, have been used for cardiac surveillance of patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Developments in imaging, specifically myocardial deformation imaging, also known as strain, have been shown to be sensitive tools in detecting early changes in cardiac function. This review aims to synthesize the evidence that supports emerging serum biomarkers and complementary imaging modalities that continue to enhance the detection of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although some emergency department risk stratification tools consider non-specific ECG findings as an aid in disposition decisions, their clinical value in patients with an initially low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) is unclear., Objective: Our purpose was to determine if non-specific ECG (ns-ECG) findings are associated with 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ED patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who have a low initial hsTnI., Methods: Using the prospective Siemens Atellica hsTnI Food and Drug Administration submission observational database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of the association between ns-ECG findings (defined as left bundle branch block [LBBB], ST depression [STD], or T-wave inversions [TWI]) and 30-day MACE (death, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, or coronary revascularization). Eligible patients presented with suspected ACS to one of 29 US EDs from April 2015 to April 2016, had stable vital signs, a blood sample for hsTnI (Siemen's Atellica, Siemens Healthineers, Inc, Malvern, PA) obtained at 1, 3, and 6 hours after ED presentation, and were followed for 30 days. The relationship between 30-day outcome, initial hsTnI, and ns-ECG was evaluated using chi-square testing., Results: Of 2676 enrolled, 1313 patients met the inclusion criteria and are included in the analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 years (54, 72), 54% were male, with 56% white, and 39% African American. Median (interquartile range) times from symptom onset to presentation and presentation to specimen collection were 92 (0, 216) and 146 (117, 177) minutes, respectively. The most common presenting symptoms were chest pain (84%), followed by dyspnea (9%). ECG findings were categorized as T-wave inversion or non-specific T wave changes (42%), ST depression ns-ECG ST changes (16%), or LBBB (2%). Thirty-day MACE occurred in 72 (5.5%) patients, with coronary revascularization (35 patients, 2.7%) and heart failure (25 patients, 1.9%) being the most frequent outcomes. In patients with an initial hsTnI below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 2.5 ng/L (n = 449), there was no association between ns-ECG changes and 30-day MACE ( P  = 0.42). If the hsTnI was ≥LOQ (2.5 ng/L), there were increased rates of 30-day MACE and ns-ECG findings ( P  = 0.01)., Conclusion: In ED suspected ACS patients without unstable vital signs, and an initial hsTnI less than the LOQ (2.5 ng/L), ns-ECG findings are not associated with 30-day major adverse cardiac events. The use of ns-ECG findings in ACS disposition should be considered in the context of hsTnI levels., Competing Interests: Lamees Alshaikh: The author has no disclosures to report. Fred Apple: Board of Directors: HyTest Ltd; associate editor: Clinical Chemistry; Advisory Boards: Instrumentation Laboratory, Siemens Healthineers, Osler Diagnostics, Qorvo; Honorarium for Speaking at Industry Conferences: Siemens Healthineers, Abbott Diagnostics; principal investigator on Industry Funded Grants (non‐salaried) on cardiac biomarkers through Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute: Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott POC, BD, Beckman Coulter, Ortho‐Clinical Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthcare, ET Healthcare, Qorvo. Frank Peacock: Research Grants: Abbott, Becton Dickenson, Brainbox, Calcimedica, CSL Behring, Cue, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Relypsa, Roche, Salix, Siemens. Consultant: Abbott, Astra‐Zeneca, Beckman, Bosch, Fast Biomedical, Forrest Devices, Ischemia Care, Dx, Instrument Labs, Janssen, Nabriva, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Osler, Relypsa, Roche, Quidel, Salix, Siemens, Upstream. Stock/Ownership Interests: AseptiScope Inc, Brainbox Inc, Braincheck Inc, Coagulo Inc, Comprehensive Research Associates LLC, Comprehensive Research Management Inc, Emergencies in Medicine LLC, Fast Inc, Forrest Devices, Ischemia DX LLC, Lucia Inc, Prevencio Inc, ScPharma, Trivirum Inc, Upstream Inc. Christopher R. deFilippi: Research funding to Inova fromAbbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, and Ortho Diagnostics, and consults for FujiRebio, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, and Ortho Diagnostics. James McCord: Research Support: Beckman, Abbott, Siemens, Roche. Consulting: Beckman, Roche. Richard Nowak: The author has no disclosures to report. Robert H. Christenson: Consultant: Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, Quidel Diagnostics, Sphingotech, Becton Dickinson, Beckman Coulter. Scientific Advisory Board: Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, Quidel Diagnostics, Sphingotech, Becton Dickinson. Alexander T. Limkakeng: Research funding from the following entities: Roche Diagnostics, Inc., Abbott Laboratories 2020‐now, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics until 2020, Bristol Meyers Squibb 2019–2020, GE 2019—2020, Astrazeneca 2019—2020, Forest Devices, Inc: 2019—2020, Department of Defense/Henry Jackson Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Regeneron, Becton Dickinson., (© 2022 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians.)

Background Multiple biomarkers have been independently and additively associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the prognostic value of suPAR (soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor) and hsTnI (high-sensitivity troponin I) levels in symptomatic patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that high levels of these biomarkers will be associated with the risk of future adverse outcomes. Methods and Results Plasma levels of suPAR and hsTnI were measured in 556 symptomatic patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease. A biomarker risk score was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers above the median in this cohort (suPAR>2523 pg/mL and hsTnI>2.7 pg/mL). Survival analyses were performed with models adjusted for traditional risk factors. All-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure) served as clinical outcomes over a median follow-up of 6.2 years. Mean age was 57±10 years, 49% of the cohort patients were female, and 68% had a positive stress test. High suPAR and hsTnI levels were independent predictors of all-cause death (hazard ratio=3.2 [95% CI, 1.8-5.7] and 1.3 [95% CI, 1.0-1.7], respectively; both P <0.04) and major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio=2.7 [95% CI, 1.4-5.4] and 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2-2.0], respectively; both P <0.002). Compared with a biomarker risk score of 0, biomarker risk scores of 1 and 2 were associated with 19- and 14-fold increased risk of death and development of major adverse cardiovascular events, respectively. Conclusions Among symptomatic patients with no obstructive coronary artery disease, higher levels of suPAR and hsTnI were independently and additively associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Whether modification of these biomarkers will improve risk in these patients needs further investigation.

Heart failure (HF) biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way HF patients are evaluated and managed. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are the gold standard biomarkers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, and studies on natriuretic peptide-guided HF management look promising. An array of additional biomarkers has emerged, each reflecting different pathophysiological processes in the development and progression of HF: myocardial insult, inflammation and remodeling. Novel biomarkers, such as mid-regional pro atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), highly sensitive troponins, soluble ST2 (sST2), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 and Galectin-3, show potential in determining prognosis beyond the established natriuretic peptides, but their role in the clinical care of the patient is still partially defined and more studies are needed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Heart failure pathogenesis and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic interventions., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)