Search

Copyright of RumeliDE Journal of Language & Literature Research / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi is the property of RumeliDE Uluslararasi Hakemli Dil & Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The candidature of Eric Zemmour, a far-right polemicist journalist, in the 2022 presidential election has aroused the indignation and amazement of political leaders of all stripes. The polemicist held on December 5, 2021 in Villepinte his first major meeting since his announcement, where he tried to restore his image and present an ethos of the ideal leader. The purpose of this article is to analyze the images that Zemmour broadcasts of himself during the meeting as well as the different strategies he uses to convey an ethos favorable to his person. It is a question of determining the different constructions that the candidate makes of his own image. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of XVIIe Siècle is the property of Presses Universitaires de France and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neuphilologische Mitteilungen is the property of Modern Language Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Fear and hatred are affections inherent to human nature; they are not exclusive to the current historical moment but have worsened in recent decades. According to Zygmunt Bauman (2016), "fear and hatred have the same origin and feed on the same thing". Such a statement is an excuse to inquire -through the analytical discourse and by following the Freudian indication- as to what it is feasible to say about the relationship between fear and hatred in the current reality: applying psychoanalytic premises to other practices and fields of knowledge allows us both to raise new problems and to glimpse in a different light those already conceived. This indication invites us to think with the psychoanalytic doctrine, in this case, the discourse of fear and hatred, more than just denouncing it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Acta Universitatis Lodziensis: Folia Litteraria Romanica is the property of Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lodzkiego and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Dégénérés ! de Michel Provins est une œuvre particulière dans le répertoire du théâtre français de contestation sociale. Inspiré par les traités médicaux sur les cas de « dégénérescence », le dramaturge décide d’y brosser les portraits de bourgeois égoïstes et pervers qui, au lieu de remplir leurs obligations envers la société, s’enlisent dans une vie de débauche. L’écrivain exprime un mépris sincère à l’égard des élites moralement abaissées qui contribuent à la dégradation de toute la nation. Tout d’abord, il fustige les travers des politiciens qui font carrière aux dépens des plus démunis, puis, il dénigre les hommes d’affaires et banquiers qui s’enrichissent outrageusement par la spéculation, et enfin, il s’en prend aux artistes et littérateurs qui propagent des vices dévastateurs pour la santé publique. En dépit de son langage virulent, Provins ne pense pas à se rallier aux anarchistes, il veut bouleverser les consciences afin de régénérer l’humanité.

Copyright of Cadernos de Pesquisa is the property of Fundacao Carlos Chagas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Trivium (2176-4891) is the property of Mestrado Profissional em Psicanalise, Saude e Sociedade da Universidade Veiga de Almeida and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Taken from interviews with men having been incarcerated on the charge of criminal association with the intent of committing or aiding and abetting to terrorist acts, the central question of this article has thus emerged: which part does Islamist radicalization play on the psychic level of the self? Therefore, we have selected several theorical concepts, to guide us in this research, that became operative concepts, such as hatred, drive, melancholy and symptom. These have a converging point that is linked with the clinic of boredom and emptiness, or named otherwise, "off language". The radicalization process seems to come as a way to fill this emptiness, and hence to avoid the risk of the collapsing of the self. However, this "solution" is only a lure, leading to destruction, while at the same time, the person is aiming to restore its identity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Il s'agit d'une approche conceptuelle de la notion de Passion, de son évolution au cours du temps ; la méthodologie repose sur l'analyse des textes princeps et la recherche de termes et de thèmes qui perdurent dans la pensée contemporaine et peuvent éclairer les radicalisations liées au terrorisme. L'auteur analyse l'apparition du lien entre passion et folie à partir des philosophes antiques et la persistance du rapport à la raison de sous-catégories des passions comme la haine et les radicalités. D'abord centré sur l'individu, on assiste à l'extension de son usage vers le groupe avec la notion de passion sociale. État affectif dominant la vie de l'esprit d'un individu, la passion est par la suite analysée successivement comme subordonnée à la raison et susceptible de devenir une forme de folie chez les Stoïciens. Le pouvoir théologico-politique les fera considérer comme des attitudes d'incapacité et d'insoumission à la loi divine. Considéré d'abord comme une opinion, le passage au courant médical et aliéniste amène la caractérisation d'entités nosographiques avant que ne soient soulignés le contexte particulier des pensées radicales et le questionnement des radicalités religieuses et philosophiques. Les analyses des médecins et aliénistes reflèteront les conceptions de leur temps, mais se dégageront progressivement du contexte religieux. Le rapport au rationnel et au vrai sera restauré dans l'analyse des délires au XIXe siècle. L'analyse des pensées radicales et des radicalités sera plus tardive et inclura le passage des passions individuelles aux passions collectives et aux passions sociales. It is a conceptual approach to the notion of passion, its evolution over time. The methodology is based on the analysis of original texts and the search for terms and themes that persist in contemporary thought. The author analyses the appearance of the link between passion and madness since ancient philosophers and the persistence of the relationship to reason and subcategories of passions, such as hatred and can inform terrorism-related radicalizations. The author analyses the appearance of the link between passion and madness from ancient philosophers and the persistence of the relationship to the reason of subcategories of passions such as hatred and radicalities. Initially focused on the individual, we see the extension of its use towards the group with the notion of social passion. An affective state dominating the life of an individual's mind, passion is subsequently analyzed successively as subordinate to reason and likely to become a form of madness among the Stoics. The theological–political power will cause them to be regarded as attitudes of incapacity and disobedience to the divine law. Viewed first as an opinion, the passage to the medical and alienist current leads to the characterization of nosographic entity before the particular context of radical thoughts and the questioning of religious and philosophical radicalities is emphasized. The analyses of doctors and alienists will reflect the conceptions of their time but will gradually emerge from the religious context. The relation to the rational and the true will be restored in the analysis of the delusions in the 19th century. The analysis of radical thoughts and radicalities will be late and will include the passage from individual passions to collective passions and social passions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

'Hate stereotyping' occurs when researchers foreground negative emotions, especially hate, as motivating right-wing social movements, epitomized by labels like 'hate group'. This convention contradicts empirical evidence showing that hateful feelings and ideological prejudices are mostly insignificant for attracting and retaining members in such movements. Using contemporary theories of hate, this article demonstrates the concept's limits and misuse in studying and theorizing the political Right. For instance, hate's theoretical and methodological ambiguity sometimes leads scholars to confuse hatred with right-wing ideology and prejudice, which can obfuscate findings and spur dubious generalizations across political groups. Moreover, some researchers accept post-structuralist theories of hate as a substitute for vital data on emotions, motivations and meaning-making among right-wing actors. Hate explanations persist because they appeal to 'common sense' about intolerance, not because of their methodological integrity for studying right-wing movements. By foregrounding intolerance, hate stereotyping risks sustaining the dominant narrative that prejudices such as racism are deviant, and that racism is a problem of bad attitudes and fringe ideologies, rather than larger issues of systemic and structural inequality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Trivium (2176-4891) is the property of Mestrado Profissional em Psicanalise, Saude e Sociedade da Universidade Veiga de Almeida and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Espiga is the property of Revista Espiga and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article aims to show how aggressiveness was taken into account by psychoanalysis from the first Freudian essays to Lacan's reinterpretation, which, starting from aggressiveness of the subject directed to a similar other, evolves to the concept of hatred of the Other. In this regard, we emphasize the last stage of Lacan's teaching, which highlights the concept of Real, crucial to understand the inception of hatred in the subjective constitution. We show how this reference starts to influence the way culture - and especially the clinic - are affected, summoning the subject to deal with the Real of existence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores Bion's theory of links, L, H, K (Love, Hate and Knowledge) and their minus counterparts, -L, -H, -K, which are not conceivable as simply opposite to or as a lack of L, H, K. Rather, they correspond to a way of experiencing Love, Hatred and Knowledge in terms of absoluteness, and in terms of a radical impossibility of acknowledging loss, relativeness and absence. The theory of links is also examined in its evolution towards the conceptualization of three types of container/contained configurations (commensal, symbiotic and parasitic). These Bionian models are compared and referred to the way Jung articulates the coexistence of 'good' and 'evil', and the paradoxical nature of mental functioning in relation to the individuation process. The images taken from the Rosarium Philosophorum, particularly the Fons Mercurialis, examined by Jung in 'The psychology of the transference' (1946), are explored in the paper. Theory is examined with a particular focus on the adolescent mind and its dramatic phenomenology. Two excerpts taken from the analytic work with a mid-adolescent female patient and a late-adolescent male patient are presented to describe minus-Hate as a form of absolute love, and minus-Love as a form of absolute hatred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The transfero-countertransference relationship is a real working tool for the caregiver, the caregiver, the psychist. It invites us to think of hatred and cruelty. Between cruelty and tenderness, what capacities for intrapsychics and intersubjectives re-co-births does the caregiver have in himself in order to consider a patient who is himself in a state of absolute dependence and who survives somatically and psychically? The cruelty in clinical studies of the extrem, that of the clinic of chronic renal failure, is specified here, illustrated. The patient and the caregiver are caught, genuinely and fantastically, between a haematophilic cruelty, consequent on vampiric orality on hemodialysis, and an anthropophagous cruelty, resulting from cannibalic orality in the clinic of renal transplant. A clinical encounter with a transplanted kidney patient and the paradoxical thoughts that it aroused in one of us will refine our point. We will discuss a constituent cruelty to conclude on the need to think in any caregiver hatred and cruelty. For us, this allows to be at the service of the care relationship, therefore of somatopsychic entanglement, to free himself from it so as not to act, in particular by active/passive reversals, this hatred and this cruelty in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Acta Universitatis Lodziensis: Folia Litteraria Romanica is the property of Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lodzkiego and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In Euripides' tragedy Orestes are represented the events occurred in the city of Argos after the murder of Clytemnestra. The main character of the play is the matricide Orestes, who is displayed extremely excited in the planning of a new crime, the one of Helena and her daughter Hermione. This paper aims to analyze hatred towards the woman as motivation of the plot from the psychoanalytic theory of Lacanian orientation. Contempt becomes an antecedent of the tragic action by moving from Clytemnestra towards Helena, emblematic figure of Greek mythology for being considered as the most beautiful woman. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Frontières is the property of Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Revue Frontieres and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Author-supplied Abstracts.)

By referring to a clinical example of psychoanalytic family psychotherapy, the author highlights the relevance of the hate and rivalry dynamics characterizing the sibling and family links. In particular, the author analyses the rivalry identification of the daughter with her dead elder brother, and her hate link with her younger one. The focus on the family's common and shared psychic world allows these dimensions to be considered more in depth. The author describes a sequence of the psychotherapeutic work, also by referring to the use of dream analysis, by focusing particularly on a denial pact that characterises the family dynamics and on the interpsychic dynamics related to the replacement child. The author shows the importance of taking into account both the oedipal and the fraternal dimension in working psychoanalytically with families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]