Search

Varicose veins (VVs) and varicose ulceration (VU) are usually considered non-life-threatening conditions, but in some cases they can lead to major complications such as fatal bleeding. The aim of this systematic review is to evidence the most updated information on bleeding from VV and VU. As evidence acquisition, we planned to include all the studies dealing with "Haemorrhage/Bleeding" and "VVs/VU". We excluded all the studies, which did not properly fit our research question, and with insufficient data. As evidence synthesis, of the 172 records found, after removing of duplicates, and after records excluded in title and abstract, 85 matched our inclusion criteria. After reading the full-text articles, we decided to exclude 68 articles because of the following reasons: (1) not responding properly to our research questions; (2) insufficient data; the final set included 17 articles. From literature searching, we identify the following main issues to be discussed in the review: epidemiology and predisposing factors, pathophysiology and forensic aspects, first aid. It has been estimated that deaths for bleeding due to peripheral venous problems account up to 0.01% of autopsy cases. From a pathological point of view, venous bleeding may arise from either acute or chronic perforation of an enlarged vein segment through the weakened skin. From a forensic point of view, in cases of fatal haemorrhage the death scene can even simulate non-natural events, due to crime or suicide. In most cases, incorrect first aid led to fatal complications. Further investigation on epidemiology and prevention measures are needed.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of reports indicates that vaccines against influenza may interact with specific drugs via drug metabolism. To date, actual impact of vaccine-drug interactions observed in the real world clinical practice has not been investigated. METHODS: From VAERS and VigiBase, we collected Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) reports for individuals receiving vaccines against influenza recorded as suspect and selected cases where predictable toxicity was recorded with oral anticoagulants, antiepileptics and statins (i.e. hemorrhages, overdosage and rhabdomyolysis, respectively). We applied AEFI and Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) Algorithms to assess causality of drug-vaccine interactions. RESULTS: 116 AEFI reports submitted to VAERS and 83 from Vigibase were included in our analysis; antiepileptics and statins were related to the highest number of indeterminate/consistent (93.7%; 65.3%) and possible/probable (50%; 57.7%) cases according to the AEFI and DIPS, respectively. The majority of cases occurred within the first week after vaccine administration (5-7 days). CONCLUSION: The relative paucity of detected interactions does not impact on the benefit of the vaccination against influenza, which remains strongly recommended; this does not exclude that closer monitoring for selected patients exposed to concomitant chronic pharmacological therapies and affected by predisposing factors may be useful.

Resumen Objetivo: Evaluar el uso concomitante de la warfarina y el acetaminofén en una población ambulatoria de pacientes anticoagulados, como posible factor de riesgo en el aumento de la Relación Normalizada Internacional (INR). Métodos: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo. Se analizó la información de 1.458 pacientes anticoagulados con la warfarina. El factor de riesgo fue la utilización conjunta de warfarina- acetaminofén; el tiempo de seguimiento fue de 1 mes y como evento final se consideró un incremento del INR igual o mayor a 0,5 unidades. La asociación del factor de riesgo con el evento final se estableció con el riesgo relativo (RR) y el riesgo atribuible poblacional (RAP). Resultados: 63 pacientes cumplieron criterios de inclusión, 21 pacientes expuestos y 42 pacientes no expuestos. En los individuos expuestos se observó un aumento estadísticamente significativo en el INR al mes siguiente de haber iniciado el tratamiento con el acetaminofén comparado con el momento de ingreso al estudio (mes 1: mediana 3,06 vs. mes 0: mediana 2,63), (valor p = 0,003). En contraste, en los sujetos no expuestos no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los valores del INR (mes 0: mediana 2,63 vs. mes 1: mediana 2,75), (valor p = 0,115). El uso de la warfarina y el acetaminofén representó un RR de 2,5 veces mayor de incrementar el INR mayor o igual de 0,5 unidades. Conclusión: El uso concomitante de la warfarina y el acetaminofén está asociado a un aumento del INR igual o mayor de 0,5 unidades, lo cual podría generar un mayor efecto anticoagulante y, por tanto, un mayor riesgo potencial de sangrado. Abstract Motivation: To assess concomitant use of warfarin and acetaminophen in an outpatient population of patients receiving blood-thinning drugs as a possible risk factor for the increase of International Normalised Ratio (INR). Methods: Retrospective cohort study. The information pertaining 1,458 patients receiving blood-thinning drugs with warfarin was analysed. The risk factor was the joint intake of warfarin and acetaminophen; follow-up time was 1 month and the final event considered was a INR increase of or higher than 0.5 units. The association of the risk factor with the final event was establish with the Relative Risk (RR) and the Population Attributable Risk (PAR). Results: 63 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 21 were exposed patients and 42 were unexposed patients. In the exposed patients a statistically significant increase of INR on the month following the onset of treatment with acetaminophen was observed, compared to the baseline values (month 1: median 3.06 vs. month 0: median 2.63), (p = 0.003). In contrast, no statistically significant differences of INR values were observed in unexposed individuals (month 0: median 2.63 vs. month 1: median 2.75) (p = 0.115). The combination of warfarin and acetaminophen represented a RR 2.5 times higher to increase INR greater than or equal to 0.5 units. Conclusion: Concomitant use of warfarin and acetaminophen is associated to an increase of INR equal to or greater than 0.5 units, which could generate a higher blood-thinning effect and, thus, cause a potentially higher risk of bleeding.

ResumenObjetivoEvaluar el uso concomitante de la warfarina y el acetaminofén en una población ambulatoria de pacientes anticoagulados, como posible factor de riesgo en el aumento de la Relación Normalizada Internacional (INR).MétodosEstudio de cohortes retrospectivo. Se analizó la información de 1.458 pacientes anticoagulados con la warfarina. El factor de riesgo fue la utilización conjunta de warfarina-acetaminofén; el tiempo de seguimiento fue de 1 mes y como evento final se consideró un incremento del INR igual o mayor a 0,5 unidades. La asociación del factor de riesgo con el evento final se estableció con el riesgo relativo (RR) y el riesgo atribuible poblacional (RAP).Resultados63 pacientes cumplieron criterios de inclusión, 21 pacientes expuestos y 42 pacientes no expuestos. En los individuos expuestos se observó un aumento estadísticamente significativo en el INR al mes siguiente de haber iniciado el tratamiento con el acetaminofén comparado con el momento de ingreso al estudio (mes 1: mediana 3,06 vs. mes 0: mediana 2,63), (valor p=0,003). En contraste, en los sujetos no expuestos no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los valores del INR (mes 0: mediana 2,63 vs. mes 1: mediana 2,75), (valor p=0,115). El uso de la warfarina y el acetaminofén representó un RR de 2,5 veces mayor de incrementar el INR mayor o igual de 0,5 unidades.ConclusiónEl uso concomitante de la warfarina y el acetaminofén está asociado a un aumento del INR igual o mayor de 0,5 unidades, lo cual podría generar un mayor efecto anticoagulante y, por tanto, un mayor riesgo potencial de sangrado.AbstractMotivationTo assess concomitant use of warfarin and acetaminophen in an outpatient population of patients receiving blood-thinning drugs as a possible risk factor for the increase of International Normalised Ratio (INR).MethodsRetrospective cohort study. The information pertaining 1,458 patients receiving blood-thinning drugs with warfarin was analysed. The risk factor was the joint intake of warfarin and acetaminophen; follow-up time was 1 month and the final event considered was a INR increase of or higher than 0.5 units. The association of the risk factor with the final event was establish with the Relative Risk (RR) and the Population Attributable Risk (PAR).Results63 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 21 were exposed patients and 42 were unexposed patients. In the exposed patients a statistically significant increase of INR on the month following the onset of treatment with acetaminophen was observed, compared to the baseline values (month 1: median 3.06 vs. month 0: median 2.63), (p=0.003). In contrast, no statistically significant differences of INR values were observed in unexposed individuals (month 0: median 2.63 vs. month 1: median 2.75) (p=0.115). The combination of warfarin and acetaminophen represented a RR 2.5 times higher to increase INR greater than or equal to 0.5 units.ConclusionConcomitant use of warfarin and acetaminophen is associated to an increase of INR equal to or greater than 0.5 units, which could generate a higher blood-thinning effect and, thus, cause a potentially higher risk of bleeding.