Search

Background: Letrozole is an aromatase inhibitor, which has been proposed as a great tool in ovulation induction and infertility management. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of letrozole in combination with gonadotropins and GnRH antagonist is superior to gonadotropins and GnRH antagonist alone in women undergoing ICSI treatment. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted during the period from October 2017 to March 2020 in a private fertility center. 112 participants were randomly allocated into two groups either intervention (Letrozole plus antagonist protocol) or control (antagonist protocol) groups. Participants were subjected to ovarian stimulation (OS) using a GnRH antagonist protocol. Only for the intervention group, letrozole was added from the second day of the cycle to the sixth day. On the day of hCG trigger, endometrial thickness, estradiol and progesterone level were assessed. The results were correlated to the outcomes of the Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. Results: Both the intervention and control groups wer balanced in respect to the demographic and clinical characteristics. The stimulation outcomes were comparable between the two studied groups. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate were comparable between both groups. There was no significant relation between the day of embryo transfer and either occurrence of clinical pregnancy or ongoing pregnancy among both groups' participants. Conclusions: Letrozole co-treatment in the first five days of gonadotropins stimulation in anatagonist cycles did not show any significant change in the pregnancy outcomes of ICSI cycles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The morphofunctional features of the ovaries were evaluated in rats with functional ovarian cysts model treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. Administration of the antagonist significantly (p=0.009) reduced the number of cysts and the growth of follicles in the ovaries. The obtained results attest to a possibility of successful treatment of functional ovarian cysts with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied the expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), androgen receptor (AR) and luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) in the ovaries under the conditions of the modeling and subsequent treatment of functional ovarian cysts with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (ant-GnRH). The intensity of IGF-1, LHR, and AR expression in the generative elements of rat ovaries changed under conditions of functional ovarian cysts simulation, as well as during treatment with ant-GnRH. In both experimental groups, the expression levels of the studied markers in preantral follicles and epithelial lining of cysts were found to be related to the number of growing follicles and cysts. A divergence of LHR and AR expression indices and a more pronounced decrease in the number of cystic cavities were observed in the group receiving ant-GnRH. These changes demonstrate a positive effect of ant-GnRH on intra-ovarian regulatory factors and a therapeutic effect in functional ovarian cysts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tomoyuki Tatenuma,1,2 Hiroshi Miyamoto1,3 1Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; 2Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan; 3Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USACorrespondence: Hiroshi Miyamoto, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 626, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA, Tel +1 585 275 8748, Fax +1 585 273 3637, Email hiroshi_miyamoto@urmc.rochester.eduAbstract: Androgen deprivation therapy, primarily via a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor agonist or antagonist together with or without an androgen receptor antagonist, remains the mainstay of medical treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Meanwhile, relugolix has been developed as the first orally active, non-peptide, selective antagonist for the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Previous randomized studies involving patients with prostate cancer have demonstrated comparable efficacy in androgen suppression between relugolix vs other gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists or agonists. This review summarizes available data on the design and development of relugolix and its therapeutic application, and discusses if relugolix represents a promising oral alternative to injectable androgen deprivation therapy. Based on current published evidence, further investigation is likely required to determine the actual clinical benefits of relugolix therapy against prostate cancer.Keywords: androgen deprivation therapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, prostate cancer, relugolix

Abstract Background A premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge refers to an endogenous LH peak that occurs before follicle maturation or human chorionic gonadotropin injection in the process of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The effect of premature LH surge on pregnancy outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles is still controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of a premature LH surge without elevated progesterone levels on the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of patients during a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Methods A total of 730 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI were recruited for this retrospective study. Only women who either delivered a live infant or had no remaining frozen embryos after a single stimulation cycle were included in the analysis. During the study period, each patient underwent a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Women were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of a premature LH surge. The primary outcome measures were the CPR and CLBR per ovarian stimulation cycle. The secondary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, good-quality embryo rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Results Ninety-one women (12.47%) experienced a premature LH surge without elevated progesterone levels, and the other 639 (87.53%) women were assigned to the control group. The numbers of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rate were significantly greater in the premature LH surge group than in the control group. There was no significant difference between groups in the good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. The primary outcome measures, the CPR and CLBR per ovarian stimulation cycle, were not significantly different between the premature LH surge group and the control group. According to the analysis stratified by ovarian response (normal or high), there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the groups with and without a premature LH surge. Conclusions The retrospective study demonstrated that the patients experiencing a transient premature LH surge without progesterone elevation had equivalent pregnancy outcomes with those without a premature LH surge on a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. The present conclusions need to be further validated in a prospective well-designed large-scale study.

Introduction: The delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol seems effective for patients who are poor ovarian responders, but there are insufficient data on whether it is also effective for patients with poor-quality embryos and low rates of good blastocyst formation. Specifically, the effectiveness of delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists with progesterone has not been adequately investigated. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of the original delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol using medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and high-dose gonadotropin in patients with poor ovarian response. Methods: Overall, 156 patients with recurrent assisted reproductive technology failure who underwent the original protocol were included. They received cetrorelix acetate (3 mg) and MPA (10 mg) on cycle day 3, and high-dose gonadotropin was initiated on day 11. When the leading follicle reached 14 mm, ganirelix acetate (0.25 mg) was administered until the trigger day. The number of oocytes retrieved, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, two pronuclear (2PN) zygotes, and good blastocysts and live birth rates were compared between the previous (Cycle A) and original (Cycle B) cycles in three groups (Group A, all patients; Group B, poor responders; and Group C, patients with poor-quality embryos). Results: In Group A (n=156), the number of MII oocytes (3.6 ± 3.3 versus 4.5 ± 3.6), 2PN zygotes (2.8 ± 2.9 versus 3.8 ± 3.1), good blastocysts (0.5 ± 0.9 versus 1.2 ± 1.6), and live birth rates (0.6 versus 24.4) significantly increased in Cycle B. Similar results were obtained in Group B (n=83; 2PN zygotes [1.7 ± 1.7 versus 2.3 ± 1.8], good blastocysts [0.4 ± 0.7 versus 0.9 ± 1.3], live birth rates [0 versus 18.1]) and Group C (n=73; MII oocytes [5.1 ± 3.8 versus 6.6 ± 4.0], 2PN zygotes [4.0 ± 3.4 versus 5.4 ± 3.4], good blastocysts [0.7 ± 1.1 versus 1.6 ± 1.9], and live birth rates [1.4 versus 31.5]). Conclusion: This original protocol increased the number of MII oocytes retrieved, 2PN zygotes, good blastocysts, and live birth rates in both poor responders and in patients with poor-quality embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis is an important regulatory mechanism involved primarily in the development and regulation of the reproductive systems. The suppression of the HPG axis by gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is expected to be effective for the treatment of sex hormone‐dependent diseases, such as endometriosis, uterine fibroid, prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Despite the established involvement of GnRH signalling in these disorders, the therapeutic efficacy of small molecular GnRH antagonists for BPH and PCOS has not been adequately evaluated in non‐clinical studies. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the potential of linzagolix, a small molecular GnRH antagonist, as a potential new treatment option for BPH and PCOS. Dogs and rats exhibiting normal prostates and dogs diagnosed with prostatic hyperplasia were used to evaluate the effects of linzagolix in BPH. The effects of linzagolix were also examined in a rat model of PCOS induced by repeated administration of letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor. Linzagolix reduced serum luteinizing hormone and testosterone levels in male rats and normal or BPH model dogs and suppressed prostate weight without testosterone depletion, suggesting the existence of an optimal therapeutic testosterone level for BPH treatment. In a PCOS rat model, linzagolix improved both insulin resistance and ovarian dysfunction. Treatment with linzagolix decreased follicle‐stimulating hormone levels, but did not alter serum luteinizing hormone and testosterone levels. These results indicate that linzagolix may provide a new treatment option for GnRH‐related disorders, such as BPH and PCOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ying-Jie Ma,1,* Meng-Yao Li,1,* Jing-Yan Song,1,2 Zhen-Gao Sun1,2 1The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250011, People’s Republic of China; 2Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zhen-Gao Sun; Jing-Yan Song, Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 42, Wenhua Road (W), Lixia District, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, People’s Republic of China, Email sunzhengao77@126.com; hanlingjuzei91@126.comBackground: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) are widely used in current in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), however, whether the lowest daily dose of GnRH-ant is individualized remains unknown. Due to the negative effect of GnRH-ant on endometrial receptivity, lessening the amount of GnRH-antagonists used during controlled ovarian stimulation may be helpful for embryo implantation. As such, a randomized controlled study is essential to validate the feasibility and efficacy of daily GnRH-ant dose reduction to 0.125 mg geared towards providing scientific evidence for guidance in clinical practice.Methods: In total, 620 infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization will be enrolled in the multicentered, randomized, parallel controlled trial. Based on a computer-generated random list, they will be randomly and equally subdivided into half-dose GnRH-ant group or conventional-dose GnRH-ant group. The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy ie, intrauterine pregnancy diagnosed by pelvic ultrasonography at more than 12 weeks of gestation accompanied by normal fetal heartbeats. Secondary outcomes include cycle cancellation, premature luteinizing hormone surge, positive pregnancy, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy, early spontaneous abortion, and live birth. The intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses will be used to initially analyze the difference in ongoing pregnancy rate between the two groups, while the multiple imputation method was used to handle missing values in the data.Discussion: At present, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed on the use of the half-dose GnRH-ant protocol (0.125mg/d) to improve reproductive outcomes of IVF-ET in predicted normal responder, compared to conventional-dose GnRH-ant protocol (0.25mg/d). Half-dose GnRH-ant protocol might provide a suitable clinical solution for predicted normal responder undergoing IVF treatment. Thus, it is critical to conduct a well-designed RCT to evaluate the impact of a half-dose GnRH-ant protocol on the reproductive outcomes of IVF-ET in predicted normal responder.Trial Registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Platform on August 29, 2020. (chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2000037629). This trial is version 1.3.Keywords: gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, half-dose GnRH-ant protocol, predicted normal responder, randomized controlled trial

Endometriosis is an oestrogen‐dependent disease in which endometrial‐like tissue grows outside the uterus in women of reproductive age. Accordingly, control of oestradiol (E2) levels is an effective treatment for endometriosis. Because gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) is the main controller of E2 secretion, control of GnRH signalling by GnRH antagonism is an effective strategy for the treatment of sex hormone‐dependent diseases such as endometriosis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the potent, orally available and selective GnRH antagonist linzagolix on experimental endometriosis in rats and compare them with those of dienogest, which is used clinically to treat endometriosis. Experimental endometriosis was induced in female rats at the proestrus stage of the oestrous cycle via autotransplantation of endometrial tissue into the renal subcapsular space. Linzagolix significantly decreased cyst volumes compared with the control group at doses of 50 mg/kg or more. Indeed, a suppressive effect of dienogest on cyst volume was observed only at the highest dose evaluated (1 mg/kg). The effective concentration of linzagolix, calculated as the free form of the last‐observed drug concentration, was ~1 μmol/L in endometriosis model rats. The present study also reveals that linzagolix exerts a sustained inhibitory effect on E2 secretion, indicating that the suppressive effect on endometriosis cyst volumes could be attributed to its pharmacological suppression of GnRH signalling and serum E2 concentrations. Altogether, our findings indicate that linzagolix may be a useful therapeutic intervention for hormone‐dependent diseases including endometriosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge refers to an endogenous LH peak that occurs before follicle maturation or human chorionic gonadotropin injection in the process of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The effect of premature LH surge on pregnancy outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles is still controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of a premature LH surge without elevated progesterone levels on the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of patients during a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Methods: A total of 730 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI were recruited for this retrospective study. Only women who either delivered a live infant or had no remaining frozen embryos after a single stimulation cycle were included in the analysis. During the study period, each patient underwent a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Women were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of a premature LH surge. The primary outcome measures were the CPR and CLBR per ovarian stimulation cycle. The secondary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, good-quality embryo rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: Ninety-one women (12.47%) experienced a premature LH surge without elevated progesterone levels, and the other 639 (87.53%) women were assigned to the control group. The numbers of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rate were significantly greater in the premature LH surge group than in the control group. There was no significant difference between groups in the good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. The primary outcome measures, the CPR and CLBR per ovarian stimulation cycle, were not significantly different between the premature LH surge group and the control group. According to the analysis stratified by ovarian response (normal or high), there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the groups with and without a premature LH surge. Conclusions: The retrospective study demonstrated that the patients experiencing a transient premature LH surge without progesterone elevation had equivalent pregnancy outcomes with those without a premature LH surge on a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. The present conclusions need to be further validated in a prospective well-designed large-scale study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeElagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist approved in the United States for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. We performed a real-world evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis who were initiating elagolix therapy in the United States.Patients and methodsThis retrospective cohort database analysis included women 18-49 years of age with ≥1 pharmacy claim for elagolix between August 2018 and December 2019 from the Copyright © 2020 Truven Health Analytics LLC. All Rights Reserved. Women had continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment during the baseline period (year immediately preceding the index date [date of earliest elagolix claim]) and had ≥1 medical claim with endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 code [617.x and N80.x]) on or before the index date. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, ICD code-based endometriosis anatomic site, endometriosis-related treatments, and pain symptoms were summarized descriptively.ResultsThe study included 2083 patients with mean age at baseline of 33.2 ± 8.1 years. Comorbidities most commonly recorded were non-cancer, non-endometriosis pain (59.5%), including arthritis/joint pain (43.7%) and back/neck pain (31.7%), and mental disorder (40.7%), including anxiety (32.7%). The majority of endometriosis diagnosis codes recorded referred to unspecified location (52.3%) and pelvic peritoneum (23.0%); 61.0% of patients received a medical endometriosis-related treatment in the baseline period, with the most common treatments being contraceptives (various routes of administration, 40.2%) and progestins (31.7%). Additionally, 35.4% of the patients received an endometriosis-related surgery during baseline, with the most common being laparoscopy (33.2% of all patients). Opioids were used during the baseline period by 57.3% of the patients. For pain symptoms, 71.5%, 30.4%, and 19.3% of the patients had claims for pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, respectively.ConclusionEndometriosis therapies were used by a significant proportion of patients with endometriosis in the year immediately preceding elagolix initiation.

Background: The optimal protocol for minimal stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF) has yet to be established. This study aims to determine if the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist during minimal stimulation improves outcomes. Materials and Methods: All cycles designated as minimal stimulation from 2014 to 2016 from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Online Reporting System were identified. Cycles in which GnRH antagonist was administered (n?=?5984) were compared to those that did not receive it (n?=?7066). Wilcoxon's rank-sum test and chi-square test were used to analyze continuous and categorical variables. Results: A total of 6750 patients undergoing 13,050 cycles were included. GnRH antagonist use was associated with a significantly higher total gonadotropin dosage (median 975.0 [interquartile range, IQR, 600.0, 1575.0] vs. median 660.0 [IQR 375.0, 975.0], p?0.001), lower cycle cancelation rate (11.3% vs. 13.6%, p?

We aimed to evaluate the effect of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection day (LHHCG) on outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) patients. It is a retrospective cohort study involving 620 women who had an IVF cycle in Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University between 2018-2020. The participants were divided into different groups according to LHHCG level and age. The clinical data and outcomes were compared between groups. The numbers of follicles (≥ 14 mm) on HCG day, retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, and two pronuclei (2PN) embryos in women with LHHCG < 2 IU/L were more than those with LHHCG ≥ 2 IU/L. Women with LHHCG < 2 IU/L had lower high-quality embryo rate (42.2% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.002) and implantation rate (40.0% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.044) compared to those with LHHCG ≥ 2 IU/L. When LHHCG < 2 IU/L, there was no significant difference in implantation rates in patients < 35 years compared to those ≥ 35 years. When LHHCG ≥ 2 IU/L, patients < 35 years old had higher implantation rates (71.7% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.001) compared to those ≥ 35 years old. The success rates of IVF fertilization and ICSI fertilization and biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates were not significantly different between groups. Our results demonstrated that women undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET might benefit from maintaining LHHCG levels at ≥ 2 IU/L. In addition, age might associate with LHHCG levels and be a better determining factor of the transfer outcome than serum LHHCG levels for IVF/ICSI-ET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Teverelix drug product (DP) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in development for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer in whom androgen deprivation therapy is indicated. The aim of this paper is to present the results of five Phase 2 studies that assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of different loading dose regimens of teverelix DP. Methods: Five single-arm, uncontrolled clinical trials were conducted in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The five different loading dose regimens of teverelix DP tested were (a) a single 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2); (b) a single 90 mg intramuscular (IM) injection of teverelix DP given 7 days apart (Days 0 and 7); (c) a single 120 mg SC injection of teverelix DP given on 2 consecutive days (Days 0 and 1); (d) 2 × 60 mg SC injections of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2), and (e) 2 × 90 mg SC injections of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2). The primary efficacy parameter was the duration of action of an initial loading dose regimen in terms of suppression of testosterone to below the castration level (0.5 ng/mL). Results: Eighty-two patients were treated with teverelix DP. Two regimens (90 mg and 180 mg SC on 3 consecutive days) had a mean duration of castration of 55.32 days and 68.95 days with >90% of patients having testosterone levels < 0.5 ng/mL at Day 28. The mean onset of castration for the SC regimens ranged from 1.10 to 1.77 days, while it was slower (2.4 days) with IM administration. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site reaction. No AEs of severe intensity were reported. Conclusions: Teverelix DP is safe and well tolerated. Castrate levels of testosterone can be rapidly achieved following the subcutaneous injection of teverelix DP on 3 consecutive days. Streamlining of the administration of the loading dose and identifying a suitable maintenance dose will be investigated in future trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Premature progesterone rise (PPR) refers to an increase in serum progesterone (P4) levels on or before the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger day. This work aimed to evaluate the impact of serum P4 levels on the day of hCG trigger on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Methods: The prospective cohort study was conducted at the Cytogenetics and Endoscopy unit, Obstetrics & Gynaecology Department, Zagazig University, including 150 women having ICSI/fresh-embryo transfer (ET). Each patient had one trial of ICSI/fresh ET cycle. In the study, patients were subjected to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) using a GnRH antagonist protocol. P4 levels were measured on the hCG trigger day (hCG-P4), and the results were correlated to the outcomes of the ICSI cycle. Results: There was a statistically significant negative correlation between hCG-P4 and the top-quality embryo (TQE) rate. No significant association was found between hCG-P4 level and clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, or miscarriage. The cutoff for hCG-P4 predicting unsuccessful achievement of clinical pregnancy was = 0.925 (p>0.05). Patients with hCG-P4 level =0.925 ng/ml had a significantly lower TQE rate than patients with hCG-P4 <0.925 ng/ml. There were significantly lower mature oocyte and TQE rates in patients with serum hCG-P4 level =1.5 ng/ml. Conclusion: PPR was associated with significantly lower TQE, and hCG-P4 levels of = 1.5 ng/ml were also associated with a significantly lower mature oocyte rate. However, it did not significantly affect pregnancy outcomes, either miscarriage, clinical or ongoing pregnancy rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High responders are characterized by a large number of retrieved oocytes and/or a high level of estradiol on the day of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin. There is controversy in the literature regarding live birth rates from fresh day-5 single blastocyst transfer (day-5 SBT) compared to cleavage-stage fresh day-3 embryo transfer (day-3 ET) in high responders. The aim of this study was therefore to compare reproductive outcomes between day-5 SBT and day-3 ET using high-quality embryos and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in high responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of 282 high responders who underwent fresh day-5 SBT (day-5 SBT group, n = 142) or two cleavage-stage fresh day-3 embryo transfer (day-3 ET group, n = 140) between 2015 and 2019. Results: No significant differences were observed between the day-5 SBT and day-3 ET groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (51.41% vs. 59.29%, p = 0.183) or live birth rate (41.55% vs. 52.86%, p = 0.057). The incidence of multiple pregnancy (1.37% vs. 36.14%) and of low birth weight (5.00% vs. 32.26%) were significantly less frequent in the day-5 SBT group than in the day-3 ET group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: SBT may be the preferred choice for high-quality embryos in high responders undergoing IVF/ICSI during GnRH antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfers. This is due to the lower incidence of obstetric complications compared to day-3 ET, although the clinical outcomes for the two groups are comparable.

Background: Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists is a powerful strategy to suppress gonadotropin activity in women with sex hormone-dependent disorders. Herein, we provide the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles of SHR7280, an oral non-peptide GnRH antagonist in healthy premenopausal women. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, doseascending, phase 1 trial, healthy premenopausal women were randomized to receive SHR7280 or placebo orally. Four doses of SHR7280 (200, 300, 400, and 500 mg BID) were planned. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were evaluated. Results: SHR7280 presented tolerable toxicity and most adverse events weremild in severity. SHR7280 showed rapid onset of action (median Tmax ranged from1.0 to 1.2 h for each dose), and plasma exposurewas dose-dependent. PD results showed that SHR7280 300 mg BID and above suppressed estrogen concentration within the estradiol (E2) treatment window for endometriosis (20-50 pg/ml), inhibited the emergence of the peak of luteinizing hormone (LH) and the concentration of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and maintained the concentration of progesterone (P) in an anovulatory state (2nmol/L). Conclusion: SHR7280 showed favorable safety, PK, and PD profiles in the dose range of 200-500 mg BID in healthy premenopausal women. This study supports the continued clinical development of SHR7280 as a GnRH antagonist for sex hormone-dependent disorders in women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Testicular toxicity following chemotherapy is of increasing importance with the continuous improvement of survival rates. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was suggested to protect testis against such toxicity; however, its suppressive quality and mechanism of action are still unclear. We examined whether and how pretreatment with GnRH antagonist protects against the testicular damage caused by chemotherapy. Methods: Mature male mice were injected subcutaneously eight times in 2-day intervals with either saline or GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide; 1 g/mg), followed by an intraperitoneal injection with either saline or cyclophosphamide (CTX;100 mg/kg BW) and sacrificed 2 weeks or 3 months later. Testicular weight, epididymis weight, epididymal sperm count and sperm motility were measured. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunohistochemistry (Ki-67), immunofluorescence (PCNA, CD34), terminal transferase-mediated deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and computerized analysis were performed to examine testicular proliferation, apoptosis and vascularization. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to assess the amount of spermatogonial reserve (Id4 and Gfra1 mRNAs). Results: Pretreatment with GnRH antagonist transiently reduced testicular weight, epididymal weight, germinal proliferation and sperm count; it also abolished the permanent long-term effect of CTX on these parameters and prevented cyclophosphamide-induced testicular toxicity characterized by apoptosis and serum AMH increase and irreversible loss of spermatogonial reserve. Conclusions: Our findings imply that pretreatment with GnRH antagonist temporarily reduces spermatogenesis and may be used as pretreatment for reducing chemotherapeutic testicular toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Control of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) signalling is an effective strategy for the treatment of sex hormone‐dependent diseases. GnRH analogues have been widely used for treating these diseases; however, initial stimulation or complete suppression of GnRH signalling by GnRH analogues results in the occurrence of several distinct adverse effects. Accordingly, we aimed to discover small molecule GnRH antagonists with superior pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Linzagolix is a potent, orally available, and selective GnRH antagonist. Here, we reported the pharmacological characterization of linzagolix in vitro and in vivo. Linzagolix selectively binds to the GnRH receptor and inhibits GnRH‐stimulated signalling, in a manner comparable to cetrorelix, a peptide GnRH antagonist. Because the inhibitory effect of the gonad axis is useful for the treatment of gynaecological conditions such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids, we investigated the effect of orally administrated linzagolix on the gonadal axis in ovariectomized and intact cynomolgus monkeys. In ovariectomized monkeys, linzagolix immediately suppressed the serum luteinizing hormone concentration at doses over 1 mg/kg, indicating dose‐dependent inhibition that correlated with serum linzagolix concentrations. In intact female monkeys, repeated linzagolix administration suppressed hormone surges and ceased or prolonged menstrual cycles. Furthermore, all animals presenting arrested menstrual cycles following linzagolix treatment showed recovery of hormone secretion and regular menstrual cycles after administration periods ended. Our results demonstrated that linzagolix has potential as a novel agent for reproductive‐age women suffering from sex hormone‐dependent diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For preparing the optimal condition in transcervical resection (TCR) surgery, gonadotropin‑releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist has been utilized. Recently, an oral GnRH antagonist (relugolix) is available and acts directly on GnRH receptor, avoiding flare up and reducing blood E2 levels rapidly. We retrospectively compared the oral GnRH antagonist (n = 14) effect to that of subcutaneous GnRH agonist (n = 19) for the pretreatment of endometrium in TCR myomectomy. Endometrial thickening was determined by intraoperative videos. The color tone of the endometrium in the normal part was assessed by digital image processing. The median duration of the first GnRH agonist injection and the surgery was 67 days(21–136 days), which is significantly longer than that of the oral GnRH antagonist group, 18.5 days (7–157 days P < 0.01). Both the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups did not exhibit prominence in the endometrium. The GnRH antagonist group showed the same degree of whiteness in the normal endometrium as the GnRH agonist group. The oral GnRH antagonist administration could rapidly atrophy the endometrium and create an optimal surgical field for TCR in a short period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Uterine leiomyomas are the most common neoplasm affecting women and frequently cause heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists provide fast symptom relief and show promise as a medical (non-surgical) treatment option and as a presurgical treatment to reduce leiomyoma size. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of oral relugolix, a small molecule GnRH receptor antagonist, in Japanese women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding. Methods This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at 36 sites in Japan in women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of ≥ 120 in one menstrual cycle. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to relugolix 10, 20, or 40 mg, or placebo, orally once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a total PBAC score of

Background: Limited studies have compared pregnancy outcomes with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) vs. gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH antagonist) in ovarian stimulation protocols. The results show heterogeneity. Objective: This study aims to assess pregnancy outcomes with the use of MPA instead of GnRH antagonist for ovarian stimulation in donor-recipient cycles. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out from June 2016 to May 2019. The study included 250 donors receiving ovarian stimulation with 2 different protocols: group 1 (n = 109) receiving GnRH antagonist (0.25 mg/day) from the 5th or 6th day of menses and group 2 (n = 141) receiving MPA (10 mg/day) from the second day of menses. In 384 recipients, 2 good-quality blastocysts were transferred after endometrial preparation. The primary endpoint was live birth in recipients. Results: The results showed that live birth was comparable in both recipient groups (59% vs. 60%, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.13-2.99, p = 0.559). The number of live-born fetuses (adjusted OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.31-1.05, p > 0.01) showed no significant difference in both groups. However, the implantation rate with twin sacs was significantly lower in group 2 (adjusted OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.99, p = 0.05). The regression analysis for goodquality blastocyst proportion was comparable (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: -4.33-5.60, p = 0.802) in both donor groups. The mean stimulation cost in group 2 was less than in group 1. Conclusion: MPA had a comparable live birth and embryological outcomes in both groups. Oral administration makes it convenient, acceptable, and patient-friendly. Its cost-effectiveness and convenience open new possibilities in ovarian stimulation protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the value of using both HMG and recombinant FSH (r-FSH) in the GnRH antagonist protocol for women with high AMH. Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2018. Of 277 GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles in women with anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ≥5 μg/L, 170 cycles receiving the combination of r-FSH and HMG (77 with HMG added at the beginning of the GnRH antagonist cycle and 93 with HMG added after GnRH antagonist administration) and 107 cycles receiving r-FSH alone were analyzed. The dynamic hormone profiles and embryonic and clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated. Results: We observed significantly lower serum LH levels in the r-FSH + HMG groups during ovarian stimulation. The serum estradiol and progesterone levels were lower in the r-FSH + HMG groups on the trigger day. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved, maturation, fertilization, blastocyst formation rate or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The implantation and live birth rates were increased in the r-FSH + HMG groups compared with the r-FSH alone group, with no statistical significance. Conclusions: HMG for LH supplementation in the GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with high AMH is not significantly superior to r-FSH alone in terms of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome. Nevertheless, HMG supplementation might be appropriate for women with an initially inadequate response to r-FSH or intracycle LH deficiency.

Abstract Background Relugolix is a once-daily, oral, nonpeptide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety of relugolix over 24 weeks in women with endometriosis-associated pain. Methods This phase 2, randomized, open-label, parallel-group extension study was conducted in 101 clinics in Japan. Patients (premenopausal females ≥ 20 years) who completed the preceding 12-week relugolix phase 2 study continued to receive relugolix (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg), placebo, or leuprorelin (3.75 mg) for an additional 12 weeks. Relugolix was administered orally once daily, and leuprorelin subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. The primary outcome was safety, including bone mineral density (BMD) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for endometriosis-associated pain. Analysis sets were defined as all patients who were administered the study drug. Results Of 487 randomized patients in the preceding study, 397 enrolled in this extension study and continued to receive placebo (n = 77), relugolix 10 mg (n = 84), relugolix 20 mg (n = 78), relugolix 40 mg (n = 89), or leuprorelin (n = 69). Baseline characteristics were similar between extension study patients and patients in the preceding study. Frequency of TEAEs including metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, and hot flush was similar in the relugolix 40-mg and leuprorelin groups. Mean (SD) change in BMD from baseline at Week 24 was − 0.2 (1.99)% for placebo; − 1.6 (2.34)%, − 2.6 (2.94)%, and − 4.9 (2.91)% for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and − 4.4 (2.16)% for leuprorelin. Mean ± SD change from baseline in mean VAS score (mm) for pelvic pain at end of treatment was − 3.2 ± 12.16 for placebo; − 6.8 ± 10.56, − 9.0 ± 11.84, and − 11.9 ± 11.26 for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and − 12.7 ± 12.57 for leuprorelin. Estradiol levels decreased with increasing relugolix dose and remained below postmenopausal levels throughout the 24-week relugolix 40-mg treatment period. Conclusions Treatment with relugolix for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated similar pain reduction to leuprorelin in women with endometriosis. The dose-dependent loss in BMD observed with relugolix treatment was expected due to an induced hypoestrogenic state. Relugolix demonstrated a similar benefit/risk profile to injectable therapy in this phase 2 study. Trial registration NCT01452685 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 17/10/2011).

Background and objectives: Teverelix drug product (DP) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in development for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer in whom androgen deprivation therapy is indicated. The aim of this paper is to present the results of five Phase 2 studies that assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of different loading dose regimens of teverelix DP. Methods: Five single-arm, uncontrolled clinical trials were conducted in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The five different loading dose regimens of teverelix DP tested were (a) a single 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2); (b) a single 90 mg intramuscular (IM) injection of teverelix DP given 7 days apart (Days 0 and 7); (c) a single 120 mg SC injection of teverelix DP given on 2 consecutive days (Days 0 and 1); (d) 2 × 60 mg SC injections of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2), and (e) 2 × 90 mg SC injections of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2). The primary efficacy parameter was the duration of action of an initial loading dose regimen in terms of suppression of testosterone to below the castration level (0.5 ng/mL). Results: Eighty-two patients were treated with teverelix DP. Two regimens (90 mg and 180 mg SC on 3 consecutive days) had a mean duration of castration of 55.32 days and 68.95 days with >90% of patients having testosterone levels < 0.5 ng/mL at Day 28. The mean onset of castration for the SC regimens ranged from 1.10 to 1.77 days, while it was slower (2.4 days) with IM administration. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site reaction. No AEs of severe intensity were reported. Conclusions: Teverelix DP is safe and well tolerated. Castrate levels of testosterone can be rapidly achieved following the subcutaneous injection of teverelix DP on 3 consecutive days. Streamlining of the administration of the loading dose and identifying a suitable maintenance dose will be investigated in future trials.

Context: Tonic hypersecretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) appears to impact both fertility and pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Aim: Whether high basal day 2/3 serum LH levels and day 2/3 LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio affect in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in PCOS patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists. Settings and Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Assisted Reproductive Technique Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, at a tertiary care institute, on PCOS patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using GnRH antagonist protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin trigger between January 2014 to December 2019. Methods and Material: Data related to patient's age, body mass index, day 2/3 serum FSH, serum LH, day 2/3 LH/FSH ratio, and infertility treatment-related variables were collected from the patient record files. IVF cycle characteristics, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred were also recorded. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was calculated. Statistical Analysis: Statistical software SPSS IBM version 24.0 was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation , and range values were calculated. To compare the difference between the groups, the paired t-test was applied for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: High basal day 2/3 LH level and day 2/3 LH/FSH ratio have no statistically significant effect on embryos formed, embryo transferred, and clinical pregnancy rate. However, fertilization rates were significantly less in these groups. Conclusion: The elevated basal day 2/3 LH and LH/FSH ratio do not impair the outcome of GnRH antagonist protocol treated IVF/ICSI cycles in PCOS women.

This study aimed to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve (NOR). Infertile women with NOR who underwent their first IVF cycle were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a freeze-all strategy with delayed embryo transfer (PPOS group, n = 174) and fresh embryo transfer first (GnRH-ant group, n = 174). The primary outcome was the cLBR per aspiration. The cLBR between the PPOS group and GnRH-ant group were comparable (55.75% vs. 52.87%, p  = 0.591). A premature luteinizing hormone surge was not observed in the PPOS group, while there were six cases (3.45%) in the GnRH-ant group, but no premature ovulation in either of the groups. The pregnancy outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate, were all comparable. In addition, the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and viable embryos were similar (all p  > 0.05) between the two groups.

Background: Pharmacobiological behavior differs between gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and GnRH agonists. However, reliable evidence clarifying the difference between them is limited. Objectives: We aimed to elucidate the difference in recovery profile between GnRH antagonist (degarelix) and GnRH agonist (leuprorelin acetate or goserelin acetate) as short‐term (12 weeks) neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prior to 125I‐transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB) for localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: This study was initially designed as a single‐center, prospective, open‐label, randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint was a serum testosterone level above the castration range (>50 ng/dl) after the cessation of 12‐week neoadjuvant ADT (GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonists). All patients underwent 12 weeks of neoadjuvant ADT. The recovery profiles of hormones, prostate‐specific antigen, total prostate volume (TPV), bone mineral density, and quality of life scores were investigated. Results: Testosterone recovery duration after the last injection was significantly longer in the GnRH antagonist arm than in the GnRH agonist arm (median, 27.3 vs. 4.8 weeks, p < 0.001). The serum levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle‐stimulating hormone in the GnRH antagonist arm also remained significantly lower than those in the GnRH agonist arm between 16 and 24 weeks (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, reduction in TPV at the time of TPPB was comparable between both arms (p = 0.128). There were also no significant between‐arm differences in the International Prostate Symptom Score and the International Index of Erectile Function scores. Discussion and Conclusion: The recovery patterns of hormonal profiles after short‐term (12 weeks) neoadjuvant ADT differ between GnRH antagonists and GnRH agonists. The choice between these drugs matters and may have a clinical impact depending on the primary objective of ADT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH Ant), relugolix (R), for assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: We enrolled women undergoing ART using a GnRH Ant for controlled ovarian stimulation. We compared R; 20 mg/day with cetrorelix acetate (C); 0.125 mg. C was administered to 88 women in 2019, and R to 93 women in 2020. Clinical outcomes associated with ART were assessed in both groups. Results: The luteinizing hormone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection in the R group (1.26 ± 0.93 IU/L) were significantly lower than those in the C group (2.85 ± 3.02 IU/L). There were no cases in which egg retrieval was canceled in both groups. The total doses of gonadotropins administered were greater in the R group compared with the C group. The number of days of GnRH Ant administration in the R group (1.71 ± 0.57 days) was significantly longer compared with the C group (1.48 ± 0.58 days). The number of oocytes collected, fertilization rates, and pregnancy rates (R; 47.1% vs C; 45.8%) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion: An orally active GnRH Ant, relugolix, when used in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART, showed comparable clinical outcomes with cetrorelix. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To review data of elagolix plus estradiol and norethindrone acetate as add-back therapy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women with uterine fibroids. Data Sources: Literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS was performed using the search terms Oriahnn; elagolix, estradiol, norethindrone AND heavy menstrual bleeding; elagolix AND heavy menstrual bleeding; and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist AND heavy menstrual bleeding between January 1, 1996, to March 2, 2021. Additional data were obtained from prescribing information, references of identified articles, and abstracts from scientific meetings. Study Selection/Data Extraction: Clinical trials and articles discussing elagolix plus add-back therapy for the management of HMB in women with leiomyomas were included. Data Synthesis: Phase 3 trials met the primary end point of menstrual blood loss (MBL) less than 80 mL at month 6 and at least a 50% reduction in MBL from baseline to the final month in 68.5% of women taking elagolix plus add-back therapy enrolled in UF-1 (8.7% placebo) and 76.5% of women in UF-2 (10% placebo). The most common adverse effects include hot flushes, nausea, headache, and night sweats. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Women with symptomatic uterine fibroids can experience significant HMB resulting in distress, depression, and anxiety. Surgical intervention remains the most commonly recommended and chosen treatment. Elagolix plus add-back therapy is a nonsurgical, oral option. Conclusions: Elagolix plus add-back therapy is effective in reducing menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. However, there are several warnings and precautions that must be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative hormone therapy for hormone‐sensitive patients with breast cancer is important to prevent a recurrence. As hormone therapy does not induce infertility in patients, fertility‐preserving therapy is not provided during treatment. Here, however, we performed controlled ovarian stimulation and embryo freezing for fertility preservation under the influence of a sustained‐release gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist in a patient with breast cancer whose postoperative treatment plan was changed from hormone therapy to chemotherapy. After oocyte retrieval, the patient developed treatment‐resistant severe symptomatic ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Following treatment with oral gonadotropin‐releasing hormone antagonist, her symptoms immediately improved, and she could receive chemotherapy on schedule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eric S Surrey,1 Ahmed M Soliman,2 Beverly Johns,2 Jamie B Vora,3 Hugh S Taylor,4 Sanjay K Agarwal5 1Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree, CO, USA; 2Health Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA; 3Healthcare Solutions, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA; 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; 5Center for Endometriosis Research and Treatment, University of California, San Diego, CA, USACorrespondence: Eric S SurreyColorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, 10290 RidgeGate Circle, Lone Tree, CO 80124, USATel +1 (303)-788-8300Email ESurrey@colocrm.comPurpose: Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist approved in the United States for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. We performed a real-world evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis who were initiating elagolix therapy in the United States.Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort database analysis included women 18– 49 years of age with ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for elagolix between August 2018 and December 2019 from the Copyright © 2020 Truven Health Analytics LLC. All Rights Reserved. Women had continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment during the baseline period (year immediately preceding the index date [date of earliest elagolix claim]) and had ≥ 1 medical claim with endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 code [617.x and N80.x]) on or before the index date. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, ICD code-based endometriosis anatomic site, endometriosis-related treatments, and pain symptoms were summarized descriptively.Results: The study included 2083 patients with mean age at baseline of 33.2 ± 8.1 years. Comorbidities most commonly recorded were non-cancer, non-endometriosis pain (59.5%), including arthritis/joint pain (43.7%) and back/neck pain (31.7%), and mental disorder (40.7%), including anxiety (32.7%). The majority of endometriosis diagnosis codes recorded referred to unspecified location (52.3%) and pelvic peritoneum (23.0%); 61.0% of patients received a medical endometriosis-related treatment in the baseline period, with the most common treatments being contraceptives (various routes of administration, 40.2%) and progestins (31.7%). Additionally, 35.4% of the patients received an endometriosis-related surgery during baseline, with the most common being laparoscopy (33.2% of all patients). Opioids were used during the baseline period by 57.3% of the patients. For pain symptoms, 71.5%, 30.4%, and 19.3% of the patients had claims for pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, respectively.Conclusion: Endometriosis therapies were used by a significant proportion of patients with endometriosis in the year immediately preceding elagolix initiation.Keywords: gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, women’s health, clinical characteristics, demographics

Context/Background: A premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist downregulation, leads to cycle cancellation. Currently, risk factors for the development of premature LH surge remain unknown. Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and identify the contributing factors for premature LH surge in IVF cycles with GnRH antagonist suppression. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Setting: IVF-embryo transfer program at a fertility and research center. Materials and Methods: The study included all patients undergoing IVF from December 1, 2014, to November 30, 2018, in whom GnRH-antagonist (cetrorelix 0.25 mg/d) flexible protocol was used. The primary outcome measure was the identification of premature LH surges (documented by a 2.5-fold increase in LH from the baseline above a threshold of 17 mIU/mL) with or without a decrease in E2and appearance of free fluid on ultrasound. Results: Premature LH surges occurred in 15 (2.16%) of 692 patients undergoing IVF with GnRH-antagonist suppression. Patients with premature surges had significantly lower ovarian reserve as compared to the controls (as seen from their higher age group, higher day 2 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), lower antral follicle counts, and lower anti-Müllerian hormone). Conclusions: Premature LH surge in a GnRH-antagonist cycle can lead to cycle cancellation and disappointment. Although this is a rare event, the incidence is higher in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Further studies are needed to determine if giving the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger a day earlier or giving higher doses of GnRH-antagonist can benefit such cases.

Background: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common neoplasm affecting women and frequently cause heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists provide fast symptom relief and show promise as a medical (non-surgical) treatment option and as a presurgical treatment to reduce leiomyoma size. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of oral relugolix, a small molecule GnRH receptor antagonist, in Japanese women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding.Methods: This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at 36 sites in Japan in women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of ≥ 120 in one menstrual cycle. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to relugolix 10, 20, or 40 mg, or placebo, orally once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a total PBAC score of < 10 from week 6 to 12. A sample size of 50 patients per group was estimated to provide ≥ 95% power, based on the comparison of relugolix 40 mg with placebo using a chi-square test with a significance level of 5% (two-sided).Results: From November 2011 to September 2012, 216 patients were randomized and 214 patients (99.1%) were analyzed. The proportion (difference vs. placebo) of patients that achieved the primary endpoint in the placebo and 10-, 20-, and 40-mg relugolix groups were 0%, 20.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3-32.3, P < .001), 42.6% (95% CI: 29.4-55.8, P < .001), and 83.3% (95% CI: 73.4-93.3, P < .001), respectively. Though treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between the 20- and 40-mg groups, the incidence rates were more frequent compared with the placebo group. Most of these adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity.Conclusions: Relugolix decreased menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas in a dose-response manner, and was generally well tolerated.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01452659 , NCT01452659 (registered 17/10/2011); JAPIC Clinical Trial Information, https://www.clinicaltrials.jp , JapicCTI-111590 (registered 31/08/2011). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bone mineral density (BMD) changes during the life span, increasing rapidly during adolescence, plateauing in the third decade of life, and subsequently entering a phase of age-related decline. In women, menopause leads to accelerated bone loss and an increase in fracture risk. Between peak bone mass attainment and menopause, BMD is generally stable and the risk of fracture is typically low. This time period is marked by life events such as pregnancy and lactation, which transiently decrease BMD, yet their long-term effects on fracture risk are less certain. BMD may also be altered by exposure to medications that affect bone metabolism (e.g., contraceptives, glucocorticoids, antidiabetic medications, antiepileptic drugs). Although oral contraceptives are often believed to be neutral with regard to bone health, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists have been associated with decreases in BMD. Development of newer medical therapies, principally GnRH antagonists (e.g., ASP1707, elagolix, linzagolix, relugolix), for treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and heavy menstrual bleeding due to uterine fibroids has renewed interest in the short- and long-term impacts of changes in BMD experienced by premenopausal women. It is important to understand how these drugs influence BMD and put the findings into context with regard to measurement variability and naturally occurring factors that influence bone health. This review summarizes what is known about the effects on bone health pregnancy, lactation, and use of DMPA, GnRH agonists, and GnRH antagonists in premenopausal women and potential consequences later in life. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03213457. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Relugolix is a once-daily, oral, nonpeptide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety of relugolix over 24 weeks in women with endometriosis-associated pain.Methods: This phase 2, randomized, open-label, parallel-group extension study was conducted in 101 clinics in Japan. Patients (premenopausal females ≥ 20 years) who completed the preceding 12-week relugolix phase 2 study continued to receive relugolix (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg), placebo, or leuprorelin (3.75 mg) for an additional 12 weeks. Relugolix was administered orally once daily, and leuprorelin subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. The primary outcome was safety, including bone mineral density (BMD) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for endometriosis-associated pain. Analysis sets were defined as all patients who were administered the study drug.Results: Of 487 randomized patients in the preceding study, 397 enrolled in this extension study and continued to receive placebo (n = 77), relugolix 10 mg (n = 84), relugolix 20 mg (n = 78), relugolix 40 mg (n = 89), or leuprorelin (n = 69). Baseline characteristics were similar between extension study patients and patients in the preceding study. Frequency of TEAEs including metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, and hot flush was similar in the relugolix 40-mg and leuprorelin groups. Mean (SD) change in BMD from baseline at Week 24 was - 0.2 (1.99)% for placebo;  - 1.6 (2.34)%,  - 2.6 (2.94)%, and  - 4.9 (2.91)% for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and - 4.4 (2.16)% for leuprorelin. Mean ± SD change from baseline in mean VAS score (mm) for pelvic pain at end of treatment was - 3.2 ± 12.16 for placebo; - 6.8 ± 10.56, - 9.0 ± 11.84, and - 11.9 ± 11.26 for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and - 12.7 ± 12.57 for leuprorelin. Estradiol levels decreased with increasing relugolix dose and remained below postmenopausal levels throughout the 24-week relugolix 40-mg treatment period.Conclusions: Treatment with relugolix for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated similar pain reduction to leuprorelin in women with endometriosis. The dose-dependent loss in BMD observed with relugolix treatment was expected due to an induced hypoestrogenic state. Relugolix demonstrated a similar benefit/risk profile to injectable therapy in this phase 2 study. Trial registration NCT01452685 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 17/10/2011). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is considered to be a very popular treatment procedure that is used for many infertile women worldwide. Aim The aim was to evaluate whether the addition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist would improve the clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing IUI. Materials and methods A prospective study was performed at El-Galaa Maternity Teaching Hospital where 124 women with primary or secondary infertility were subjected to controlled ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin (74–150 IU/day) only (control group, n=62) or to human menopausal gonadotropin (75–150 IU/day) plus Cetrorelix (0.25 mg/day, starting when the leading follicle was ≥16 mm; n=62). A single insemination was performed 36 h after hCG was given (5,000 IU, intramuscularly) in both groups. Main outcome measure(s) Clinical pregnancy rate, premature luteinization (PL), and follicular development were measured. Results Clinical pregnancy rates (20 vs10.9%) and the number of mature follicles (2.2±1.1 vs 1.4±0.96) were statistically significantly higher in the antagonist group compared with the control group. The PL rate was significantly lower in the antagonist group (0.91 vs 4.61%). Conclusion The addition of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist to controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI was significantly associated with an increase in pregnancy rates in multifollicular cycles and a reduction in the incidence of PL.

Background: This phase IV routine care study evaluated ovarian responses when using a biosimilar follitropin alfa r-hFSH (Bemfola®) for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment who were pituitary-suppressed with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, non-comparative, non-interventional study (Germany/Austria) was conducted with 885 women (Mean age of 34.0±4.4 years) for whom COS with Bemfola® and GnRH-antagonist for pituitary suppression were applied as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment with/without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) observing routine clinical-practice protocols. Primary endpoint was the number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs). Results: Among 986 ART cycles, COS was given for 9.9±1.8 days (First-day r-hFSH dose of 220.7±68.9 IU; mean total dose of 2184.3±837.5 IU). It was revealed that 99.1% of cycles resulted in follicular puncture, with mean of 10.7±6.6 oocytes retrieved. Successful fertilization took place after IVF/ICSI in 93.8% of follicular punctures. Freeze-all was performed in 14.2% of cycles. Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 76.9% of cycles with follicular puncture; mean day of transfer was 3.5±1.3 and average number of transferred embryos was 1.76±0.50. Clinical pregnancy rate was 30.2% of embryo-transfer cycles and 23.4% of started cycles. Sixty-nine reports of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (7.0% of started cycles) were documented. Conclusion: COS with Bemfola® in GnRH-antagonist IVF/ICSI protocols in a routine care setting led to an appropriate ovarian response allowing oocyte retrieval in 99.1% of initiated cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TU2670, a novel orally active, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administered to healthy female participants.Methods: This was a first-in-human, multicenter, phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose ascending trial that took place in multiple medical centers. A total of 16 healthy premenopausal women (23 to 45 years of age) were randomized and received 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg TU2670 (GnRH antagonist) or placebo 7 days (±1 day) after the onset of menstrual bleeding. We performed a noncompartmental analysis for pharmacokinetic parameters and calculated relative minimum concentration values (Cmin, % Baseline) of serum pharmacodynamic (PD) markers (luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and estradiol).Results: There were no significant differences among treatments with respect to vital signs, electrocardiography, adverse events, ovulation test results, and ultrasonography. The median Tmax of TU2670 occurred 0.75 to 1.00 hours after dosing, and concentrations then declined, with a mean apparent half-life (t1/2) of 3.0 to 5.9 hours. AUClast (17.7-417.9 ng·h/mL) and Cmax (8.1-95.4 ng/mL) increased in a dose-dependent manner. The PD analysis after a single administration of TU2670 revealed dose-dependent suppression of LH, FSH, and estradiol. Maximal suppression of the pre-dose baseline (%) was 58% to 82% at 6 to 8 hours for LH, 28% to 39% at 6 to 12 hours for FSH, and 34% to 82% at 12 to 24 hours for estradiol.Conclusion: The single administration of TU2670 in healthy premenopausal women was well tolerated and resulted in the dose-dependent suppression of LH, FSH, and estradiol, suggesting rapid and significant inhibition of pituitary and ovarian hormones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estrogen deficiency can be caused by ovarian dysfunction in females. Mechanisms underlying osteoporosis in this condition have been characterized in animal models, such as ovariectomized mice and rats, although it remains unclear how hypothalamic dysfunction promotes osteoporosis. Here, we show that administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHa) significantly decreases uterine weight, a manifestation of hypothalamic dysfunction, and promotes both cortical and trabecular bone loss in female mice in vivo. We also report that osteoclast number significantly increased in mice administered GnRHa, and that the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) accumulated in those osteoclasts. We previously reported that treatment of mice with the active vitamin D analogue ED71, also known as eldecalcitol, inhibited HIF1α accumulation in osteoclasts. We show here that in mice, co-administration of ED71 with GnRHa significantly rescued the reduced cortical and trabecular bone mass promoted by GnRHa administration alone. GnRHa-dependent HIF1α accumulation in osteoclasts was also blocked by co-administration of ED71. We conclude that hypothalamic dysfunction promotes HIF1α accumulation in osteoclasts and likely results in reduced bone mass. We conclude that treatment with ED71 could serve as a therapeutic option to counter osteoporotic conditions in humans. • Administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHa) reduces cortical and trabecular bone mass in female mice. • Hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) accumulates in osteoclasts from mice administered GnRHa. • ED71 treatment significantly rescues reduced bone mass seen in GnRHa-treated mice. • HIF1α accumulation in osteoclasts of mice administered GnRHa is blocked by simultaneous ED71 treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Can luteolysis-targeted drugs, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant), mifepristone and letrozole, administered separately or in combination, prevent the progression of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in a rat model? Thirty-six female Wistar rats were randomly divided into six groups, including control group (OHSS group, ovarian hyperstimulation-induced OHSS); GnRH-ant group (OHSS with GnRH-ant treatment); mifepristone group (OHSS with mifepristone treatment); letrozole group (OHSS with letrozole treatment); combination group (OHSS with GnRH-ant, mifepristone and letrozole treatment in combination). The main outcomes were the alterations in OHSS-related indices, including ovarian weight, vascular permeability, serum oestradiol and progesterone levels, corpus luteum proportion and diameter, ovarian vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 levels. No significant difference was found in body weight gain among the six groups. Compared with the control group, the OHSS group showed significant increases in all OHSS-related indices. GnRH-ant treatment showed decreases in vascular permeability, serum oestradiol level, corpus luteum diameter, ovarian VEGF /IL-6 mRNA levels, and increases in ovarian caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 levels. Mifepristone treatment demonstrated reduction in serum progesterone level and corpus luteum diameter, and elevation in ovarian caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 levels. Letrozole treatment displayed a decline in serum oestradiol level and corpus luteum diameter, and up-regulation in ovarian caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 levels. The combination treatment by GnRH-ant, mifepristone and letrozole showed enhanced synergistic effect on reducing OHSS-related indices. GnRH-ant, mifepristone and letrozole are beneficial in preventing the progression of OHSS through different luteolytic mechanisms. Cocktail style treatment shows enhanced synergistic effect on preventing the progression of OHSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Tonic hypersecretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) appears to impact both fertility and pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Aim: Whether high basal day 2/3 serum LH levels and day 2/3 LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio affect in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in PCOS patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists. Settings and Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Assisted Reproductive Technique Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, at a tertiary care institute, on PCOS patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using GnRH antagonist protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin trigger between January 2014 to December 2019. Methods and Material: Data related to patient's age, body mass index, day 2/3 serum FSH, serum LH, day 2/3 LH/FSH ratio, and infertility treatment-related variables were collected from the patient record files. IVF cycle characteristics, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred were also recorded. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was calculated. Statistical Analysis: Statistical software SPSS IBM version 24.0 was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and range values were calculated. To compare the difference between the groups, the paired t-test was applied for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: High basal day 2/3 LH level and day 2/3 LH/FSH ratio have no statistically significant effect on embryos formed, embryo transferred, and clinical pregnancy rate. However, fertilization rates were significantly less in these groups. Conclusion: The elevated basal day 2/3 LH and LH/FSH ratio do not impair the outcome of GnRH antagonist protocol treated IVF/ICSI cycles in PCOS women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the time course of total testosterone (TT) recovery after cessation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in Japanese patients treated with brachytherapy.Methods: In total, 125 patients with prostate cancer received 6 months of neoadjuvant ADT (nADT) followed by low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. TT was measured every 3 months after cessation of nADT, and some predictive factors affecting TT recovery were analyzed.Results: The cumulative incidence rates of TT recovery to normal levels (TT ≥ 3.0 ng/mL) after 12 and 24 months cessation were 49.6% and 81.6%, respectively. The median interval to recover to normal TT was 15 months. In multivariate analysis, the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist as nADT significantly earlier improved to recovery to normal TT level (p = 0.046). Conversely, higher body mass index (BMI) and hypertension significantly prolonged TT recovery to normal (p = 0.026 and p = 0.026, respectively).Conclusions: Approximately one-fifth of patients still had low TT levels 2 years after the cessation of 6 months nADT before LDR brachytherapy. Use of a GnRH agonist, higher BMI, and hypertension were the predictive factors for slower TT recovery to normal TT levels after the cessation of nADT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endometriosis is an estrogen dependent disease, which occurs frequently in women of childbearing age. The incidence rate is high, and the treatment time is long. It seriously affects the physical and mental health and quality of life of women. At present, its pathogenesis has not been clarified, and the available treatment methods have their limitations, so improving the existing treatment scheme and finding new treatment drugs have become a research hotspot. In this paper, the traditional medicine and emerging medicine of endometriosis are described. This article will focus on the introduction of emerging drugs such as gonadotropin -releasing hormone antagonist, aromatase inhibitors, selective progesterone receptor modulators, selective estrogen receptor modulators, anti-angiogenic agents and antioxidants, in order to provide new ideas for the research and treatment of endometriosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dyspareunia experienced by women diagnosed with endometriosis is associated with a decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated the relationship of clinically meaningful improvements in dyspareunia with HRQoL changes among women with endometriosis. This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase III ELARIS-I and ELARIS-II clinical trials. Women aged 18–49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were randomized to placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily. HRQoL was measured using the validated Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire (EHP-30), consisting of 5 core domains and a sexual intercourse modular domain. Dyspareunia was ranked 0–3 (none, mild, moderate, or severe) or not applicable using a daily eDiary and averaged monthly. A woman with a clinically meaningful dyspareunia response (dyspareunia responder) was defined as a woman with a reduction from the baseline in dyspareunia score greater than or equal to a predetermined cutoff while maintaining stable/decreased analgesic use. Dyspareunia response impact on EHP-30 scores was determined at 3 and 6 months using multivariate linear regression controlling for age, baseline EHP-30 scores, and dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain symptom severity. Analysis included 1,368 women with a mean age of 32.2 years. Dyspareunia responders had significant improvements vs non-responders in all adjusted mean EHP-30 domain scores at months 3 and 6 (control and powerlessness: −17.8 and −18.5; emotional well-being: −10.0 and −10.4; pain: −15.3 and −15.7; self-image: −11.4 and −12.8; social support: −14.3 and −14.0; and sexual intercourse: −18.1 and −19.7; all P <.0001). Dyspareunia improvements are associated with both personal and psychological benefits. This study involved a large sample of women from a well-defined patient population to provide statistical power in evaluating the results. As such, the findings may not be generalizable in a real-world setting. Although the perception of dyspareunia and its severity and the associated effect on HRQoL was subjective, the use of a large patient sample was used to minimize potential issues with this limitation. Clinically meaningful responses in dyspareunia are associated with improvements across multiple HRQoL domains among women with endometriosis. Agarwal SK, Soliman AM, Pokrzywinski RM, et al. Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Dyspareunia Is Associated with Significant Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of Elagolix. J Sex Med 2020;17:2427–2433. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background There is limited literature investigating the effects of body mass index (BMI) and androgen level on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Androgen-related variation in the effect of body mass index (BMI) on IVF outcomes remains unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, 583 infertile women with PCOS who underwent IVF using the conventional GnRH-antagonist protocol were included. Patients were divided into four groups according to BMI and androgen level: overweight- hyperandrogenism(HA) group, n = 96, overweight-non-HA group, n = 117, non-overweight-HA group, n = 152, and non-overweight-non-HA group, n = 218. Results A significantly higher number of oocytes were retrieved, and the total Gn consumption as well Gn consumption per day was significantly lower, in the non-overweight groups than in the overweight groups. The number of available embryos was significantly higher in the HA groups than in the non-HA groups. Clinical pregnancy rate was of no significant difference among four groups. Live-birth rates in the overweight groups were significantly lower than those in non-overweight-non-HA group (23.9, 28.4% vs. 42.5%, P

Context: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in fixed or flexible regimens are used for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, however, data comparing these regimens in stimulated intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles are lacking. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonists in fixed and flexible regimens on the rate of premature luteinization (PL) and ovulation rate in sequential clomiphene-gonadotropin controlled ovulation–IUI cycles. Settings and Design: This study was conducted at tertiary care center; this was randomized controlled study. Materials and Methods: A total of 45 infertile women randomized into three groups of 15 each received clomiphene citrate + human menopausal gonadotrophin. GnRH antagonist was added according to fixed (n = 15) and flexible (n = 15) protocol. No antagonist in control group (n = 15). PL was defined as LH level ≥10 mIU/ml and progesterone level ≥1.0 ng/ml. Statistical Analysis: Mean values compared using the Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance. Categorical variables distribution tested using either Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results: Of a total of 45 women, 58% (n = 26) presented with primary and 42% (n = 19) secondary infertility with mean age of 30.8 ± 3.43 years and BMI 26.57 ± 3.22 kg/m2. Fixed regimen (3.7%) showed most reduction in PL compared to flexible (15.38%, P = 0.33) or control (36.67%, P = 0.004). On human chorionic gonadotropin day, mean LH (P = 0.002) and progesterone (P = 0.079) levels in fixed, flexible, and control groups were as follows: 5.04 ± 5.47 mIU/ml, 3.95 ± 4.16 mIU/ml, 9.57 ± 7.91 mIU/ml, and 0.409 ± 0.320 ng/ml, 0.579 ± 0.727 ng/ml, and 1.033 ± 1.022 ng/ml, respectively. Ovulation (P = 0.813) and pregnancy rates (P = 0.99) were 88.9%, 84.6%, and 90% and 22.2%, 19.23%, and 10% in fixed, flexible, and control groups, respectively. Conclusions: Addition of antagonist in any regimen appears to lower PL rates and improve pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI cycles.

Background: Luteal support is a key to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol. This study aimed to compare the effect between vaginal progesterone (VP) and intramuscular progesterone (IMP) with GnRH-antagonist protocol after IVF-ET. Methods: A total of 1760 patients (18 years ≤ age ≤35 years) undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol were studied retrospectively between September 2014 and August 2015 in Peking University Third Hospital. In the patients, 1341 patients received VP (VP group) and 419 patients received IMP (IMP group) as luteal support. We compared clinical outcomes between these two groups. The primary objective of the study was the live birth rate. Measurement data between the two groups were conducted using independent samples t-test. The variables in line with non-normal distribution were expressed as median (p25 and p75) and were compared using nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: Live birth rate in VP group was 38.55%, significantly higher than that in the IMP group, which was 30.79% (χ2 = 8.287, P = 0.004). The clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate and implantation rate in VP group were also significantly higher than those in the IMP group (clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate 47.35% vs. 41.29%, χ2 = 4.727, P = 0.030; implantation rate 30.99% vs. 25.26%, χ2 = 14.546, P < 0.001). Any statistically significant differences in ectopic pregnancy and abortion rates between two groups were not observed. Conclusion: Luteal support with VP had better clinical outcomes for young women undergoing IVF-ET with GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer‐related deaths in men, representing a major source of morbidity and mortality. Androgen deprivation therapy is the primary treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer at disease presentation, which can be achieved either with surgical or chemical castration. The development of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonists revolutionized the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, replacing the need for surgical castration. Agonists downregulate gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist receptors in the pituitary gland, and thus decrease the release of luteinizing hormone and testosterone. Although agonists are a common therapeutic option to date, their use is associated with testosterone surges, metabolic dysfunction and an increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease; they might contribute to tumor flares and potentially an increase in non‐cancer mortality. More recently, gonadotropin‐releasing hormone antagonists have entered the prostate cancer treatment landscape. Unlike agonists, antagonists directly inhibit the androgen receptor in the pituitary gland, and thus do not cause initial testosterone surges. In this article, we provide a concise review of the mechanism of actions, safety and efficacy of the approved agonists and antagonists for prostate cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]