Search

Aim: To evaluate the potential association between suicidality and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs), as well as other medications used for obesity and diabetes, using comprehensive global data. Materials and Methods: This study utilized the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database, encompassing adverse drug reaction reports from 1967 to 2023, from 170 countries (total reports, N = 131 255 418). We present the reported odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and information component (IC) with IC025 regarding the association between GLP‐1RA use and suicidality. Results: Although reports of GLP‐1RA‐associated suicidality increased gradually from 2005 to 2023 (n = 332), no evidence of an association was observed (ROR 0.15 [95% CI 0.13 to 0.16]; IC −2.77 [IC025 −2.95]). The lack of evidence of an association persisted regardless of whether GLP‐1RAs were used for diabetes treatment (ROR 0.13 [95% CI 0.11 to 0.14]; IC −2.95 [IC025 −3.14]) or obesity treatment (ROR 0.44 [95% CI 0.34 to 0.58]; IC −1.16 [IC025 −1.62]). However, an association was found between suicidality and other diabetes medications excluding GLP‐1RAs (ROR 1.13 [95% CI 1.10 to 1.15]; IC 0.17 [IC025 0.13]). Similarly, the potential association with suicidality was observed in medications used to treat obesity excluding GLP‐1RAs (ROR 1.08 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.14]; IC 0.10 [IC025 0.01]). Conclusions: The suspected association between GLP‐1RA use and suicidality, as raised by the European Medicines Agency, was not found in our global analysis. This indicates that the sporadic reports of GLP‐1RA‐associated suicidality are likely influenced by factors such as comorbidities present in the GLP‐1RA user population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During weight loss, reductions in body mass are commonly described using molecular body components (eg, fat mass and fat-free mass [FFM]) or tissues and organs (eg, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle). While often conflated, distinctions between body components established by different levels of the 5-level model of body composition—which partitions body mass according to the atomic, molecular, cellular, tissue/organ, or whole-body level—are essential to recall when interpreting the composition of weight loss. A contemporary area of clinical and research interest that demonstrates the importance of these concepts is the discussion surrounding body composition changes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), particularly in regard to changes in FFM and skeletal muscle mass. The present article emphasizes the importance of fundamental principles when interpreting body composition changes experienced during weight loss, with a particular focus on GLP-1RA drug trials. The potential for obligatory loss of FFM due to reductions in adipose tissue mass and distribution of FFM loss from distinct body tissues are also discussed. Finally, selected countermeasures to combat loss of FFM and skeletal muscle, namely resistance exercise training and increased protein intake, are presented. Collectively, these considerations may allow for enhanced clarity when conceptualizing, discussing, and seeking to influence body composition changes experienced during weight loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The concept of quadruple therapy as a "one-size-fit-all" approach is effective among all eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with consistent and significant clinical benefits including reduced mortality across various subgroups. However, with exception of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, the consistency of benefit with therapies does not extend to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The clinical benefits of other promising medical therapies, such as angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have been demonstrated only in certain phenotypes of the highly heterogenous heart failure with preserved ejection fraction population. This variability can confuse frontline practicing cardiologists, potentially leading to the under-implementation of these medications. Therefore, we propose a simple approach: "targeted" combination therapy. This strategy aims to optimize evidence-based medications in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by tailoring treatments to specific subgroups within the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction population where significant benefits are most evident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Materials and Methods Results Conclusions ClinicalTrials.gov The aim was to investigate the effects of lotiglipron, a once‐daily, oral small‐molecule glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist, in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity.A phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study investigated the efficacy and safety of lotiglipron. The study was terminated early for safety reasons after routine data and monitoring review. The planned analyses for the end points were modified prior to unblinding the study.In total, 901 participants were treated with at least one dose of the study drug (T2D cohort: n = 512, obesity cohort: n = 389). Although the majority of participants who were randomly assigned to higher doses did not reach their target maintenance dose, statistically significant changes in HbA1c and body weight were observed. In the T2D cohort, reductions in HbA1c were observed across all lotiglipron doses at week 16 (p < 0.0001), with least squares mean decreases up to −1.44% (90% confidence interval [CI]: −1.63, −1.26) (lotiglipron 80 mg), versus placebo, −0.07% (90% CI: −0.25, 0.11). In the obesity cohort, decreases in body weight were observed across all lotiglipron doses at week 20 (p < 0.01), up to −7.47% (90% CI: −8.50, −6.43) (lotiglipron 200 mg, five‐step titration), versus placebo, −1.84% (90% CI: −2.85, −0.83). Across cohorts, the most frequently reported treatment‐emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal related (most mild to moderate severity), with nausea being the most common (ranging from 4% [placebo] to 28.8% [80 mg] in the T2D cohort and 12.5% [placebo] to 60.6% [200 mg, four‐step titration] in the obesity cohort). Transaminase elevations were observed in a subset of participants (6.6% and 6.0% of participants on lotiglipron in the T2D and obesity cohorts, respectively, compared with 1.6% on placebo in the obesity cohort).The efficacy (HbA1c and/or body weight) of a range of lotiglipron doses was demonstrated in T2D and obesity cohorts. The safety profile was largely consistent with what has been previously known about the mechanism of action. Our results are unique in reporting elevations in liver transaminases in a subset of participants treated with lotiglipron, with attempts to identify the at‐risk population unsuccessful and therefore clinical development of lotiglipron terminated.NCT05579977. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Materials and Methods Results Conclusions Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and obesity are major global health challenges, eventually leading to kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but body mass index (BMI) thresholds hinder kidney transplantation. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists induce weight loss, thereby offering attractive treatment options; however, their safety and efficacy have not been systematically investigated in patients undergoing dialysis.We conducted a prospective 12‐week, open‐label trial with 13 patients who had a BMI ≥ 30.00 kg/m2, were undergoing dialysis (12 haemodialysis and 1 peritoneal dialysis) and had not been listed for transplantation due to their weight. Semaglutide was administered once weekly subcutaneously, and the dose was increased from 0.25 mg to 0.5 mg and then to 1 mg. Study endpoints included change in body weight and BMI (primary – statistically evaluated by repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]), side effects, adverse events, blood parameters and patient‐reported outcomes (secondary).At baseline, the mean age ± standard deviation of patients was 64.0 ± 6.4 years, the mean weight was 113.9 ± 16.6 kg, and the mean BMI was 37.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2. At week 12, average weight reduction under semaglutide treatment was 4.6 ± 2.4 kg and ranged from 2.0 to 9.7 kg (p < 0.001 for weight and BMI reduction across the study period). One patient discontinued treatment due to nausea/vomiting, two patients died of unrelated causes and six patients reported side effects. Approximately 9 months after the treatment started, three patients were able to seriously reconsider being listed for transplantation.Semaglutide treatment resulted in significant reduction in weight and BMI in patients with obesity undergoing dialysis, while maintaining an acceptable side effect profile comparable to that of the non‐dialysis population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate, through post hoc analysis of nine studies from the SemaglUtide Real‐world Evidence (SURE) programme, the safety of once‐weekly (OW) semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice, complementing findings from the phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) SUSTAIN programme. Methods: The SURE studies had a duration of ~30 weeks and included adults with diagnosed T2D treated with OW semaglutide. Safety information, including hypoglycaemic events, were collected and analysed for the total study population and for patient subgroups based on baseline patient characteristics, baseline co‐medication and prescriber specialty. Results: Of the total 3505 patients, 24.3% reported adverse events (AEs), with most patients reporting non‐serious (22.3%) and mild (17.1%) AEs. AEs mainly belonged to the gastrointestinal disorders system organ class (16.3% of patients). In total, 5.1% of patients reported AEs that led to treatment discontinuation, 0.5% reported serious adverse drug reactions and 0.2% had an AE with a fatal outcome, reported as unrelated to treatment. Overall, 1.1% and 0.1% of patients reported level 2 and 3 hypoglycaemic events, respectively. A higher rate of level 2 hypoglycaemia was observed in patients with baseline microvascular complications treated with insulin versus those on insulin without these complications. Conclusions: Safety data reported in the real‐world SURE studies were generally consistent with observations in phase 3 OW semaglutide RCTs. No new safety concerns were identified, highlighting that OW semaglutide is well tolerated by adults with T2D and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Recently, the development of the oral glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist semaglutide has drawn a great deal of attention. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of oral glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist semaglutide and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors on glycaemic control and several metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over a 6‐month period. Methods: Fifty‐nine participants were included, and we compared various clinical parameters between before and after switching from DPP‐4 inhibitors to oral semaglutide in 'study 1' (pre‐post comparison) and set the control group using the propensity score matching method in 'study 2'. Results: In 'study 1', 6 months after the switching, the glycated haemoglobin value was significantly reduced from 7.5% to 7.0%, and the body mass index was also decreased from 29.7 kg/m2 to 28.8 kg/m2. Such effects were more clearly observed in participants whose glycaemic control was poor. In 'study 2', after 1:1 propensity score matching, 51 participants from each group were matched, and glycaemic control as well as body weight management were improved in the switching group compared with the DPP‐4 inhibitor continuation group over the 6‐month observation period. Conclusion: In this study, including obese participants with poor glycaemic control, switching DPP‐4 inhibitors to oral semaglutide showed more beneficial effects on both glycaemic and weight control, irrespective of age, body weight and diabetes duration. Therefore, we should bear in mind that it would be better to start using an oral semaglutide in clinical practice, particularly in obese participants with poor glycaemic control with DPP‐4 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), especially in patients with comorbid diabetes and obesity. This study investigated the effects of GLP-1RAs on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with MASLD, as measured by changes in vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and other clinical parameters in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of 96 patients with MASLD from a multidisciplinary care clinic who completed VCTE at baseline and follow-up within 6–24 months to compare changes in controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), as well as other metabolic markers, between GLP-1RA users and nonusers using two-sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We also assessed whether improvements in hepatic steatosis, defined as a change in CAP >38 dB/m as previously described in the literature, were associated with improvement in fibrosis. Results: GLP-1RA use resulted in significant improvements in weight (−8.1 kg vs. −3.5 kg, P = 0.009), body mass index (BMI) (−2.9 kg/m2 vs. −1.3 kg/m2, P = 0.012), alanine aminotransferase (−15.0 IU/L vs. −4.0 IU/L, P = 0.017), aspartate aminotransferase (−5.0 IU/L vs. −1.0 IU/L, P = 0.021), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (−0.7% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.019), and CAP (−59.9 dB/m vs. −29.1 dB/m, P = 0.016). Responders also had significant improvements in weight (−9.2 kg vs. −1.9 kg, P < 0.001), BMI (−3.3 kg/m2 vs. −0.7 kg/m2, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (−6.1 mmHg vs. −0.7 mmHg, P = 0.028), HbA1c (−0.8% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001), and LSM (−1.5 kPa vs. 0.1 kPa, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with MASLD treated with GLP-1RAs showed significant improvements in hepatic steatosis and multiple other metabolic parameters, with weight loss as the proposed mechanism for this liver improvement. In addition, change in CAP >38 dB/m was associated with improvements in LSM and other metabolic parameters, suggesting the clinical utility of VCTE in the surveillance of MASLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/hypothesis: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) has been proposed as a measure of changes in kidney microstructure, including kidney fibrosis. In advanced kidney disease, the kidneys often become atrophic; however, in the initial phase of type 2 diabetes, there is an increase in renal size. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors both provide protection against progression of kidney disease in diabetes. However, the mechanisms are incompletely understood. To explore this, we examined the effects of semaglutide, empagliflozin and their combination on renal ADC and total kidney volume (TKV). Methods: This was a substudy of a randomised clinical trial on the effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin alone or in combination. Eighty patients with type 2 diabetes and high risk of CVD were randomised into four groups (n=20 in each) receiving either tablet placebo, empagliflozin, a combination of semaglutide and tablet placebo (herein referred to as the 'semaglutide' group), or the combination of semaglutide and empagliflozin (referred to as the 'combination-therapy' group). The semaglutide and the combination-therapy group had semaglutide treatment for 16 weeks and then had either tablet placebo or empagliflozin added to the treatment, respectively, for a further 16 weeks; the placebo and empagliflozin groups were treated with the respective monotherapy for 32 weeks. We analysed the effects of treatment on changes in ADC (cortical, medullary and the cortico–medullary difference [ΔADC; medullary ADC subtracted from cortical ADC]), as well as TKV measured by MRI. Results: Both semaglutide and empagliflozin decreased cortical ADC significantly compared with placebo (semaglutide: −0.20×10−3 mm2/s [95% CI −0.30, −0.10], p<0.001; empagliflozin: −0.15×10−3 mm2/s [95% CI −0.26, −0.04], p=0.01). No significant change was observed in the combination-therapy group (−0.05×10−3 mm2/s [95%CI −0.15, 0.05]; p=0.29 vs placebo). The changes in cortical ADC were not associated with changes in GFR, albuminuria, TKV or markers of inflammation. Further, there were no changes in medullary ADC in any of the groups compared with placebo. Only treatment with semaglutide changed ΔADC significantly from placebo, showing a decrease of −0.13×10−3 mm2/s (95% CI −0.22, −0.04; p=0.01). Compared with placebo, TKV decreased by −3% (95% CI −5%, −0.3%; p=0.04), −3% (95% CI −5%, −0.4%; p=0.02) and −5% (95% CI −8%, −2%; p<0.001) in the semaglutide, empagliflozin and combination-therapy group, respectively. The changes in TKV were associated with changes in GFR, albuminuria and HbA1c. Conclusions/interpretation: In a population with type 2 diabetes and high risk of CVD, semaglutide and empagliflozin significantly reduced cortical ADC compared with placebo, indicating microstructural changes in the kidneys. These changes were not associated with changes in GFR, albuminuria or inflammation. Further, we found a decrease in TKV in all active treatment groups, which was possibly mediated by a reduction in hyperfiltration. Our findings suggest that DWI-MRI may serve as a promising tool for investigating the underlying mechanisms of medical interventions in individuals with type 2 diabetes but may reflect effects not related to fibrosis. Trial registration: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) 2019-000781-38 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context The coexistence of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with substantial risks of adverse cardiovascular events. Objective The relevant outcomes associated with the use of a sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) vs glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with/without concomitant AF remain unknown. Methods In this nationwide retrospective cohort study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, there were 344 392 and 31 351 patients with T2D without AF, and 11 462 and 816 T2D patients with AF treated with SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs, respectively, from May 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Patients were followed from the drug index date until the occurrence of study events, discontinuation of the index drug, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2020), whichever occurred first. We used propensity score–stabilized weight to balance covariates across the 2 medication groups. Results The incidence rate of all study outcomes in patients with concomitant AF was much higher than in those without concomitant AF. For the AF cohort, SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) (2.32 vs 4.74 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), with no benefit seen for the non-AF cohort (P for homogeneity <.01). SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA was associated with a lower risk of composite kidney outcomes both in the AF (0.38 vs 0.79 events per 100 person-years; HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.96) and the non-AF cohorts (0.09 vs 0.18 events per 100 person-years; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-0.64). There were no significant differences in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in those who received SGLT2i compared with GLP-1RA for the AF or non-AF cohorts. Conclusion Considering the high risk of developing HF and/or high prevalence of concomitant HF in patients with concomitant diabetes and AF, whether SGLT2is should be the preferred treatment to GLP-1RAs for such a high-risk population requires further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. Methods In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. Results At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from −8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) −10.3, −6.3] to −6.9% [95% CI −9.1, −4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P =.39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P =.042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P =.24–.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P <.0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P <.001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. Conclusions In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04788511 and NCT04916470. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As obesity evolves as a global pandemic, the use of drugs to treat it is booming. The latest among these are Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). Along with their use, the incidence of adverse events has become more common. Although severe effects have been mentioned, details and associations are unclear regarding some of them. We performed a systematic review of studies related to GLP-1 RA drugs. Drugs that have been the subject of at least three studies meeting all our criteria were included. Analysis of GLP-1 RA therapies across eight studies, involving 4422 subjects, indicated varying rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Semaglutide demonstrated an SAE incidence of 8.9%, compared to 6.2% for Liraglutide. These results were not statistically significant. For both drugs, no clear association with pancreatitis or neoplasm was established. Discontinuation rates due to adverse effects were 10.3% for Semaglutide and 8.3% for Liraglutide. Severe adverse effects with GLP-1 RA use are not uncommon, and warrant further close monitoring when patients are started on treatment. Further studies are required to analyze the difference between the adverse effect profiles of each drug and to assess whether or not each of these severe adverse effects is dose dependent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1A) medications are gaining widespread popularity for the treatment of obesity. The optimal use of these drugs in pediatric bariatric populations, and especially in those considering metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), is yet to be established. We sought to characterize current practice patterns of GLP-1A use at major pediatric bariatric centers across the United States. We administered an online survey to a purposive sample of 46 surgeons who perform MBS on children and adolescents. Survey questions explored practices prescribing GLP-1As in patients considering MBS, holding them prior to elective operations, and restarting them postoperatively following MBS. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics and inductive content analysis. There were 22 responses (48% response rate) representing 19 institutions. Most (86%) respondents do sometimes prescribe GLP-1As for patients considering MBS, but the specific indications vary. Practices for holding GLP-1As preoperatively also vary, from not at all to holding for 2 wk. Over half (55%) of respondents sometimes restart GLP-1As after MBS. Free-response themes included still-evolving preoperative utilization patterns, difficulty with access and insurance coverage, and a lack of data informing GLP-1A use in the pre and postoperative periods. Given the increasing use of these medications for weight loss purposes, this substantial variation in practice highlights a need for further research to examine the safest and most effective use of GLP-1As in the pre and postoperative periods and for practice guidelines to standardize care pathways in pediatric bariatric contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) with premixed insulin, insulin degludec plus insulin aspart (IDegAsp), in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drug(s) (OADs). Methods: In Soli‐D, a 24‐week, multicentre, open‐label, study, insulin‐naïve adults were randomized 1:1 to once‐daily injections of iGlarLixi (n = 291) or IDegAsp (n = 291), with continued metformin ± sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint was non‐inferiority in HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints included superiority in HbA1c change and body weight (BW) change at week 24. Hypoglycaemia rates were also assessed. Results: At week 24, iGlarLixi showed non‐inferiority and superiority over IDegAsp in HbA1c reduction (least squares [LS] mean difference: −0.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: –0.33, −0.07]; P <.001 for non‐inferiority; [97.5% CI: –0.35, −0.05]; P =.003 for superiority). iGlarLixi decreased BW and IDegAsp increased BW from baseline to week 24, with a statistically significant LS mean difference of −1.49 kg in favour of iGlarLixi (97.5% CI: –2.32, −0.66; P <.001). Event rates (per person‐year) for American Diabetes Association (ADA) Level 1, 2 or 3 hypoglycaemia were lower for iGlarLixi (1.90) versus IDegAsp (2.72) (relative risk: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.98). No ADA Level 3 hypoglycaemia or unexpected safety findings were reported. Conclusions: In Chinese people with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs, once‐daily iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control with BW benefit and lower hypoglycaemia event rates versus IDegAsp. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use has increased over the last decade for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk reduction, and weight loss. Clinical trials indicate that gastrointestinal adverse effects are commonly experienced and severe hypoglycemia is rare; however, there is little data regarding glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in overdose. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review evaluating and characterizing glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposures reported to a single poison center between 2006 and 2023. Patient demographics, circumstances of exposure, clinical effects, and outcomes were abstracted from charts. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize demographic information and clinical factor data. Results: A total of 152 charts met inclusion criteria. Therapeutic errors accounted for 91% of exposures. Most patients (67%) reported no symptoms, although not all patients were followed to a definitive outcome. Nausea, vomiting, generalized weakness, and abdominal pain were the predominant symptoms reported. Most patients (62%) were monitored and closely followed in the home setting. Hypoglycemia was rare but occurred in the setting of a single agent glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure in two patients. Two additional patients who developed hypoglycemia involved co-administration of insulin. 21% of the exposures were related to errors on initial use of the pen. Conclusion: Exposures to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have increased substantially over the years. Effects from an exposure tended to be mild and primarily involve gastrointestinal symptoms. Hypoglycemia was rare. Therapeutic and administration errors were common. Education on pen administration may help to reduce errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Semaglutide is increasingly used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Ensuring the safety of this medication is crucial for its clinical use. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety profile of semaglutide across patient populations and treatment durations. Methods: Randomized controlled trials assessing the safety of semaglutide vs. placebo, with specified treatment durations were identified. The primary outcome was occurrence of any cardiovascular adverse events. Secondary outcomes included sudden cardiac death, adverse events leading to death, adverse events, gastrointestinal side effects, occurrence of hypoglycemia, and new-onset neoplasm. Results: A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria with a combined sample size of 57,911 participants. The meta-analysis revealed that the adverse event associated with semaglutide is gastrointestinal in nature (nausea and vomiting). No significant differences were observed between semaglutide and comparator groups. Conclusion: Semaglutide appears to have a favorable safety profile across diverse patient populations and treatment durations, supporting its continued use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. It is generally well-tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events. Clinicians should be aware of these findings and monitor patients accordingly. Further long-term studies are warranted to assess the safety of semaglutide in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA) may promote bone formation, but conversely, they could also weaken bones due to the reduction in mechanical load associated with weight loss. However, the clinical effects in humans have not been clearly demonstrated. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate whether GLP‐1RAs affect BMD and bone turnover markers. Material and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on June 13, 2024. The eligibility criteria were: (1) human studies, (2) receiving a GLP‐1RA for more than 4 weeks, (3) an untreated control group or a placebo group, (4) reporting of at least one BMD or bone turnover marker, and (5) an RCT design. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Fixed‐ or random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed according to heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies were included in the meta‐analysis. GLP‐1RAs did not significantly change BMD in the femoral neck (mean difference [MD], 0.01 g/cm2; 95% CI, −0.01–0.04 g/cm2), in the total hip (MD, −0.01 g/cm2; 95% CI, −0.02–0.01 g/cm2), and in the lumbar spine (MD, 0 g/cm2; 95% CI, −0.02–0.02 g/cm2). C‐terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), a bone resorption marker, significantly increased after GLP‐1RA treatment (MD, 0.04 μg/L; 95% CI, 0.01–0.07 μg/L). GLP‐1RAs did not significantly change bone formation markers such as procollagen type 1 N‐terminal propeptide, bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin. Conclusions: GLP‐1RA did not affect BMD and bone formation markers. However, GLP‐1RAs led to a significant increase in CTX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kae Sunagawa,1,2 Keiji Hirai,3 Sumito Sunagawa,1,2 Norifumi Kamiya,1 Isao Komesu,1 Yusako Sunagawa,1 Hiroshi Sunagawa,1 Ken Nakachi,4 Aizan Hirai,5 Susumu Ookawara,3 Yoshiyuki Morishita3 1Sunagawa Medical Clinic, Okinawa, Japan; 2Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Hematology, and Rheumatology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan; 3Division of Nephrology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Shonan Hospital, Okinawa, Japan; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Chiba, JapanCorrespondence: Keiji Hirai, Division of Nephrology, First Department of Integrated Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma-cho, Saitama-shi, Saitama-ken, 330-8503, Japan, Tel +81 48 647 2111, Fax +81 48 647 6831, Email keijihirai@kfy.biglobe.ne.jpPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the additional effects of empagliflozin on liraglutide in patients with advanced-stage type 2 diabetic kidney disease.Patients and Methods: Forty-one patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with liraglutide alone during the first 6 months and subsequent treatment with liraglutide plus empagliflozin during the next 6 months (liraglutide plus empagliflozin group) (n = 20) or treatment with liraglutide alone for 12 months (liraglutide group) (n = 21). Liraglutide was administered subcutaneously once daily at a starting dose of 0.3 mg/day and up-titrated weekly by 0.3 mg to a maximum dose of 0.9 mg/day. Empagliflozin was administered orally at a dose of 10 mg once daily. The primary outcome was the change in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) during the latter 6 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in body weight, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, uric acid, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and urine protein creatinine ratio during the latter 6 months.Results: Empagliflozin significantly increased the hemoglobin concentration (from 12.9 ± 1.9 to 13.7 ± 1.9 g/dL; p< 0.05) and decreased body weight (from 66.1 ± 12.9 to 64.5 ± 12.6 kg; p< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups for estimated glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, uric acid, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and urine protein creatinine ratio.Conclusion: Empagliflozin increased hemoglobin concentration and decreased body weight in patients with advanced-stage type 2 diabetic kidney disease who received liraglutide. However, empagliflozin did not provide short-term benefits with regard to renal function decline, urinary protein excretion, or glycemic control in these patients.Keywords: empagliflozin, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, liraglutide, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, diabetic kidney disease, diabetic nephropathy

Zhen Ruan,1,&ast; Xianwen Chen,1,&ast; Menghuan Song,1 Ruxu Jia,2 Hang Luo,3 Carolina Oi Lam Ung,1,4,5 Hao Hu1,4,5 1State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, Macau SAR, People’s Republic of China; 2Global Business School for Health, University College London, London, UK; 3Shanghai Palan DataRx Co., Ltd, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, Macau SAR, People’s Republic of China; 5Centre for Pharmaceutical Regulatory Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, Macau SAR, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Hao Hu, University of Macau, Room 1050, E12 Research Building, Macau, Macau SAR, People’s Republic of China, Email haohu@um.edu.moAim: This study aimed to conduct a retrospective observational study in China to investigate the real-world utilization of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1RA) in China.Methods: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients were retrieved from the electronic medical records of 18 hospitals from 2016 to 2020. A descriptive analysis detailed patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysed the factors associated with daily and weekly GLP-1RA.Results: Fifteen thousand one hundred and seventy-six individuals were included. At the 6-month follow-up, the overall estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c was − 1.26± 1.91% (p < 0.001), the “Weekly GLP-1RA” group was − 1.58± 2.03% (p < 0.001), and the “Daily GLP-1RA” group was − 1.25± 1.90% (p < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, the overall estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c was − 0.95± 1.80% (p < 0.001), the “Weekly GLP-1RA” group was − 1.05± 1.93% (p < 0.001), and the “Daily GLP-1RA” group was − 0.95± 1.80% (p < 0.001). At 6 months following GLP-1RA initiation, there were statistically significant improvements in the mean TC, LDL-C, and TG at 6 months or 12 months separately following GLP-1RA initiation. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the mean HDL-C after 6 months. Compared with the baseline (11.92%), the proportion of patients who had an incidence of all hypoglycemia was lower at the 6-month follow-up (9.73%). Patients with dyslipidemia were more likely to use weekly GLP-1RA (OR =1.61, 95% CI: 1.27– 2.06, p < 0.001).Conclusion: In China, weekly GLP-1RA demonstrated better effectiveness compared to the daily GLP-1RA. The results confirmed the efficacy of GLP-1RA in clinical trials.Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, GLP-1RA, retrospective, China, electronic medical record, real-world

Background: The expanding roles and popularity of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists has created access barriers to medication use. We sought to describe an adverse drug event which occurred after reinitiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist following a prolonged lapse in therapy due to poor medication access. Case Summary : Once-weekly injectable semaglutide was prescribed to an outpatient 33-year-old male for chronic weight management. After a delayed initiation due to global shortage, semaglutide was initiated and titrated over five months before a seven week lapse in therapy due to prior authorization interruption. Despite the extended treatment gap, the patient was directed to reinitiate semaglutide at the target dose rather than starting dose, which was followed by recurrent, symptomatic nausea and vomiting requiring medical intervention. Practice Implications: A prolonged lapse in GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy, typically defined as missing three or more doses of a once-weekly injectable, warrants consideration of reinitiation at a reduced dose, personalized to the patient's prior gastrointestinal tolerability, efficacy goals, and therapy lapse duration. Therapy lapses with GLP-1 receptor agonists may be prevented by utilizing a multi-modal approach including extended dosing intervals, intermediate doses, agent interchange, efficient prior authorization communication, and cautious initiation of GLP-1 recent agonists while supply cannot meet demand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As obesity evolves as a global pandemic, the use of drugs to treat it is booming. The latest among these are Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). Along with their use, the incidence of adverse events has become more common. Although severe effects have been mentioned, details and associations are unclear regarding some of them. We performed a systematic review of studies related to GLP-1 RA drugs. Drugs that have been the subject of at least three studies meeting all our criteria were included. Analysis of GLP-1 RA therapies across eight studies, involving 4422 subjects, indicated varying rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Semaglutide demonstrated an SAE incidence of 8.9%, compared to 6.2% for Liraglutide. These results were not statistically significant. For both drugs, no clear association with pancreatitis or neoplasm was established. Discontinuation rates due to adverse effects were 10.3% for Semaglutide and 8.3% for Liraglutide. Severe adverse effects with GLP-1 RA use are not uncommon, and warrant further close monitoring when patients are started on treatment. Further studies are required to analyze the difference between the adverse effect profiles of each drug and to assess whether or not each of these severe adverse effects is dose dependent.

Abstract Given the substantial burden of chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes, an aggressive approach to treatment is required. Despite the benefits of guideline-directed therapy, there remains a high residual risk of continuing progression of chronic kidney disease and of cardiovascular events. Historically, a linear approach to pharmacologic management of chronic kidney disease has been used, in which drugs are added, then adjusted, optimized, or stopped in a stepwise manner based on their efficacy, toxicity, effects on a patient’s quality of life, and cost. However, there are disadvantages to this approach, which may result in missing a window of opportunity to slow chronic kidney disease progression. Instead, a pillar approach has been proposed to enable earlier treatment that simultaneously targets multiple pathways involved in disease progression. Combination therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes is being investigated in several clinical trials. In this article, we discuss current treatment options for patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes and provide a rationale for tailored combinations of therapies with complementary mechanisms of action to optimize therapy using a pillar-based treatment strategy. [This article includes a plain language summary as an additional file].

Owing to their potent glucose-lowering efficacy and substantial weight loss effects, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are now considered part of the frontline therapeutic options to treat both type 2 diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic overweight/obesity. Stemming from successful demonstration of their cardiometabolic modulation and reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events in clinical outcome trials, GLP-1 RAs have since been validated as agents with compelling cardiovascular protective properties. Studies spanning from the bench to preclinical and large-scale randomised controlled trials have consistently corroborated the cardiovascular benefits of this pharmacological class. Most notably, there is converging evidence that they exert favourable effects on atherosclerotic ischaemic endpoints, with preclinical data indicating that they may do so by directly modifying the burden and composition of atherosclerotic plaques. This narrative review examines the underlying pharmacology and clinical evidence behind the cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 RAs, with particular focus on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. It also delves into the mechanisms that underpin their putative plaque-modifying actions, addresses existing knowledge gaps and therapeutic challenges and looks to future developments in the field, including the use of combination incretin agents for diabetes and weight loss management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary This narrative review article explores the complex interplay between obesity, osteoarthritis, and their associated inflammatory cascades, offering a deeper understanding of the underlying of mechanisms of inflammation and potential therapeutic interventions targeting both diseases. Through examination of the shared inflammatory pathway of obesity and osteoarthritis, our objective is to directly elucidate the relationship between these two conditions, highlighting the promising role of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists in modulating inflammation and its therapeutic implications for patients with obesity and osteoarthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are novel hypoglycemic agents that have garnered widespread acceptance in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, largely attributed to their safety profile, potent hypoglycemic effects, and metabolic advantages. Their primary mechanisms of action encompass promoting insulin release, inhibiting glucagon secretion, bolstering pancreatic islet cell function, curbing appetite, and slowing gastric emptying. This article delves into the clinical evidence underscoring the efficacy of various GLP-1RAs. Notably, these agents have demonstrated marked improvements in glycemic control, significant weight reduction, and substantial cardiovascular and renal protection. Nonetheless, certain adverse effects of GLP-1RAs, such as pancreatitis and intestinal obstruction, have been reported, warranting vigilant monitoring by healthcare professionals. In sum, GLP-1RAs hold significant promise in the management of type 2 diabetes, offering notable cardiovascular and renal advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Tirzepatide is a glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) dual receptor agonist (RA) that reduces glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. We assessed the effectiveness of tirzepatide in real‐world use in an Arab population. Methods: Review of clinical data from a specialist outpatient diabetes centre; study time points and outcome measures were pre‐specified. Results: Tirzepatide was initiated in 8945 patients between 24 October 2022 and 31 December 2023. Of these, 3686 individuals reached 40 weeks of follow‐up. At initiation, the mean ± SD age was 54.1 ± 11.5 years, body mass index 34.6 ± 6.0 kg/m2 and HbA1c 7.3 ± 1.5% (56 ± 17 mmol/mol); 2296 (62%) were switched to tirzepatide from another GLP‐RA and 317 (8.6%) reported previous bariatric surgery. The maximum dose dispensed was ≥12.5 mg/week in 1087, 7.5‐10.0 mg/week in 1688 and 2.5‐5.0 mg/week in 911. The mean 40‐week reduction in HbA1c was 0.6 ± 1.2% (8 ± 13 mmol/mol) and the reduction in weight was 4.5 ± 6.9 kg (4.8 ± 7.3%). GLP‐RA‐naïve patients experienced a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c [1.0 ± 1.3% (11 ± 14 mmol/mol) versus 0.5 ± 1.2% (6 ± 13 mmol/mol), p <.0001] and weight (7.2 ± 8.6 vs. 4.2 ± 6.6 kg, p <.0001) compared with previously exposed individuals. Post‐metabolic bariatric surgery patients lost significantly more weight (7.8 ± 9.4 vs. 4.5 ± 7.0 kg, p <.0001). Improvements in blood pressure, lipid profile, and liver transaminases were noted at 40 weeks. Tirzepatide was well tolerated, with 288 (7.8%) of patients discontinuing treatment because of adverse effects, predominantly gastrointestinal. Conclusion: In real‐world use, tirzepatide significantly reduced HbA1c levels and weight and was well tolerated. Previous GLP‐RA use was associated with significantly lesser HbA1c and weight reduction, and previous metabolic bariatric surgery was associated with greater weight loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the effects of lotiglipron (PF‐07081532), a once‐daily, oral small‐molecule glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist, in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or obesity. Materials and Methods: Two Phase 1 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multiple‐ascending‐dose studies were conducted to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lotiglipron. Results: Across the studies, 74 participants with T2D were treated for 28 or 42 days, and 26 participants with obesity without diabetes were treated for 42 days, following randomization to placebo or lotiglipron (target doses 10–180 mg/day, with dose titration to higher target doses). Most adverse events were mild (89.6%), with nausea the most frequently reported in both studies. There were no clinically meaningful adverse trends noted in safety laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiogram parameters. In participants with T2D, lotiglipron resulted in dose‐dependent reductions in mean daily glucose. The 180‐mg dose was associated with least squares mean decreases from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (−1.61% [90% confidence interval {CI} –2.08, −1.14] vs. −0.61% [−1.56, 0.34] for placebo) and body weight (−5.10 kg [90% CI –6.62, −3.58] vs. −2.06 kg [90% CI –4.47, 0.36] for placebo) after 42 days; a similar magnitude of weight loss was seen in participants with obesity. The observed pharmacokinetic profile supported once‐daily dosing. Conclusions: The profile of once‐daily lotiglipron with doses up to 180 mg, as observed in these two Phase 1 studies, indicated a safety and tolerability profile consistent with the mechanism of action, with dose‐dependent reductions in glycaemic indices (T2D) and body weight (both populations) after multiple doses. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04305587, NCT05158244. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess whether adults with diabetes on oral hypoglycaemic agents undergoing general endotracheal anaesthesia during nine common surgical procedures who are glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP1‐RA) users, compared with non‐users, are at increased risk of six peri‐ and post‐procedure complications. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational cohort analysis of over 130 million deidentified US adults with diabetes (defined as being on oral hypoglycaemic agents) from a nationally representative electronic health dataset between 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2023 was analysed. Cohorts were matched by high‐dimensionality propensity scoring. We compared the odds of six peri‐ and postoperative complications in GLP1‐RA users and non‐users. A sensitivity analysis compared these odds in GLP1‐RA users to non‐users with diabetes and obesity. We measured the odds of (a) a composite outcome of postoperative decelerated gastric emptying, including antiemetic use, ileus within 7 days post‐procedure, gastroparesis diagnosis, gastric emptying study; (b) postoperative aspiration or pneumonitis; (c) severe respiratory failure; (d) postoperative hypoglycaemia; (e) inpatient mortality; and (f) 30‐day mortality. Results: Among 13 361 adults with diabetes, 16.5% were treated with a GLP1‐RA. In the high‐dimensionality propensity score‐matched cohort, GLP1‐RA users had a lower risk of peri‐ and postoperative complications for decelerated gastric emptying and antiemetic use compared with non‐users. The risk of ileus within 7 days, aspiration/pneumonitis, hypoglycaemia and 30‐day mortality were not different. A sensitivity analysis showed similar findings in patients with diabetes and obesity. Conclusion: No increased risk of peri‐ and postoperative complications in GLP1‐RA users undergoing surgery with general endotracheal anaesthesia was identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although, in randomized clinical trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (OW s.c.) has demonstrated superior efficacy in comparison with placebo and active controls in terms of glycemic control and body weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), these results need to be confirmed in a real-world (RW) setting. An RW ambispective study (6 months retrospective and 6 months prospective) was conducted in 10 tertiary hospitals in Spain. We evaluated changes in HbA1c and body weight in patients with T2DM treated with semaglutide OW s.c. Additionally, we analyzed different subgroups of patients treated with semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. A total of 752 patients with a mean age of 60.2 years, a mean HbA1c level of 8.5%, a mean body weight of 101.6 kg, and a mean T2DM duration of 10 years were included. At 12 months, compared with baseline, there was a mean difference of −2.1% in HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) and a mean difference of 9.2 kg in body weight (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between baseline and month 12 in both HbA1c and body weight in the four subgroups receiving semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. Semaglutide OW s.c. was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most commonly reported side effects. In this RW study, 12 months of treatment with semaglutide OW s.c. in patients with T2DM was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycemic control and weight loss, regardless of the glucose-lowering therapy received, and the overall safety profile was positive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the substantial burden of chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes, an aggressive approach to treatment is required. Despite the benefits of guideline-directed therapy, there remains a high residual risk of continuing progression of chronic kidney disease and of cardiovascular events. Historically, a linear approach to pharmacologic management of chronic kidney disease has been used, in which drugs are added, then adjusted, optimized, or stopped in a stepwise manner based on their efficacy, toxicity, effects on a patient's quality of life, and cost. However, there are disadvantages to this approach, which may result in missing a window of opportunity to slow chronic kidney disease progression. Instead, a pillar approach has been proposed to enable earlier treatment that simultaneously targets multiple pathways involved in disease progression. Combination therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes is being investigated in several clinical trials. In this article, we discuss current treatment options for patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes and provide a rationale for tailored combinations of therapies with complementary mechanisms of action to optimize therapy using a pillar-based treatment strategy. [This article includes a plain language summary as an additional file]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of semaglutide on gut microbiota, cognitive function, and inflammation in obese mice. Method: Twenty-four C57BL/6J male mice were randomly assigned to three groups: a normal-chow diet group (NCD, n = 8), high-fat diet group (HFD, n = 8), and HFD+semaglutide group (Sema, n = 8). The mice were fed a HFD to establish an animal model of obesity and then administered with semaglutide or saline for 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze test. Serum pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured. 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was used to explore gut microbiota characteristics in obese mice. Result: Obese mice showed significant cognitive impairment and inflammation. Semaglutide improved cognitive function and attenuated inflammation induced by a HFD diet. The abundance of gut microbiota was significantly changed in the HFD group, including decreased Akkermansia, Muribaculaceae, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG_002, Clostridia_UCG_014 and increased Romboutsia, Dubosiella, Enterorhabdus. Whereas semaglutide could dramatically reverse the relative abundance of these gut microbiota. Correlation analysis suggested that cognitive function was positively correlated with Muribaculaceae and Clostridia_UCG_014, and negatively associated with Romboutsia and Dubosiella. Romboutsia was positively correlated with TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β. While Clostridia_UCG_014 was negatively related to TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β. Conclusions: For the first time semaglutide displayed different regulatory effects on HFD-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis. Semaglutide could regulate the structure and composition of gut microbiota associated with cognitive function and inflammation. Thus, affecting gut microbiota might be a potential mechanism of semaglutide in attenuating cognitive function and inflammation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) are the most widely used oral hypoglycemic drugs in Japan. However, once-daily oral semaglutide has been reported to reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight (BW) without causing significant hypoglycemia. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from a DPP-4i to oral semaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of the changes in HbA1c and BW in 68 patients with T2D who were switched from a DPP-4i and took oral semaglutide for ≥ 6 months, without changes in any other oral hypoglycemic agent. Results: Mean HbA1c decreased from 7.8 to 7.0% (p < 0.001) and BW decreased from 74.2 to 71.2 kg (p < 0.001) over 6 months. The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced in participants with high baseline HbA1c (r = − 0.542, p < 0.001). There was also a trend (r = 0.236, p = 0.052) toward a decrease in BW in individuals with shorter disease duration. There were reductions in either HbA1c or BW in 65 participants (95.6%). In addition, the larger the decrease in HbA1c was, the greater was the decrease in BW (r = 0.480, p < 0.001). Eighteen participants (20.1%) discontinued the drug within 6 months, of whom 10 (11.6% of the total) did so because of suspected adverse effects and the discontinuation rate was the highest in older, non-obese patients. Conclusions: Switching from a DPP-4i to oral semaglutide may be useful for Japanese patients with T2D who have inadequate glycemic or BW control. However, its utility may be limited by gastrointestinal adverse effects in certain patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, there is no known cure for diabetes. Different pharmaceutical therapies have been approved for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), some are in clinical trials and they have been classified according to their route or mechanism of action. Insulin types, sulfonylureas, biguanides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, sodium–glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors, and incretin-dependent therapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: GLP-1R, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors: DPP-4). Although some of the currently available drugs are effective in the management of T2DM, the side effects resulting from prolonged use of these drugs remain a serious challenge. GLP-1R agonists are currently the preferred medications to include when oral metformin alone is insufficient to manage T2DM. Medicinal plants now play prominent roles in the management of various diseases globally because they are readily available and affordable as well as having limited and transient side effects. Recently, studies have reported the ability of phytochemicals to activate glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), acting as an agonist just like the GLP-1R agonist with beneficial effects in the management of T2DM. Consequently, we propose that careful exploration of phytochemicals for the development of novel therapeutic candidates as GLP-1R agonists will be a welcome breakthrough in the management of T2DM and the co-morbidities associated with T2DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6) trial showed that semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), is effective in managing type 2 diabetes by stimulating insulin secretion and promoting weight loss. Though recent evidence suggests no increased risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) with subcutaneous semaglutide use, some studies report an increase in pancreatic inflammation with GLP-1 RAs. We present a case of AP in a patient recently started on subcutaneous semaglutide for type 2 diabetes. As GLP-1 RA use increases, clinicians should be aware of their potential to cause acute pancreatitis.

Background: In 2023, the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) published “Compounded peptides: An Obesity Medicine Association Position Statement.” Since this publication, the use of compounded peptides for the treatment of obesity has continued to evolve, leading to additional confusion and questions from obesity medicine clinicians and their patients. Methods: This frequently asked questions (FAQ) document and “Call for Action” commentary is based upon the existing evidence and practical clinical experiences of the authors. Results: This FAQ is intended to provide insights beyond the original 2023 OMA Position Statement regarding the use of “compounded peptides” for treating obesity. Three obstacles impair patient access to highly effective peptide anti-obesity medications: insufficient production especially during times of high demand, high costs, and lack of clarity surrounding the role of compounded peptides. Solutions to enhance patient access to these medications lie within the existing legal and regulatory framework and Food and Drug Administration policies. Implementing these solutions necessitates dispelling misinformation and providing clear guidance on the appropriate prescribing and administration of compounded peptides, particularly during times of acknowledged shortage. Conclusion: Among stakeholders with aligned priorities, challenges can often be overcome by collaboration and communication. Towards the goal of providing patient-centered care, the OMA calls on applicable stakeholders (e.g., pharmaceutical companies, compounding pharmacy organizations, health insurance companies, and the Food and Drug Administration) to work collaboratively to achieve a consensus that improves patient access to safe anti-obesity medications. The purpose of this “Call to Action” is to ask stakeholders to provide clinicians and their patients clarity regarding the role of compounded peptide anti-obesity medications during times of FDA-acknowledged shortages. Finally, this FAQ review provides clinicians with a simple and practical checklist respective to the potential use of compounded peptides.

Abstract Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is an important cause of heart failure(HF). Recent studies reveal that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists can improve mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction in the patients with type 2 diabetes and HF. The present study aims to investigate whether semaglutide, a long-acting GLP1R agonist, can ameliorate cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload, and explore the potential mechanism. The rats were performed transverse aortic constriction (TAC) to mimic pressure overload model. The rats were divided into four groups including Sham, TAC, TAC + semaglutide, and TAC + semaglutide + HCQ (hydroxychloroquine, an inhibitor of mitophagy). The rats in each experimental group received their respective interventions for 4 weeks. The parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy(LVH) were measured by echocardiography, Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining, western-blot and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively. The changes of mitophagy were reflected by detecting cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COXII), LC3II/LC3I, mitochondria, and autophagosomes. Meanwhile, NLRP3, Caspase-1, and interleukin-18 were detected to evaluate the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in each group. The results suggest that LVH, impaired mitophagy, and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome were present in TAC rats. Semaglutide significantly reduced LVH, improve mitophagy, and down-regulated NLRP3 inflammatory signal pathway in TAC rats. However, the reversed effect of semaglutide on cardiac hypertrophy was abolished by HCQ, which restored the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome suppressed by improved mitophagy. In conclusion, semaglutide ameliorates the cardiac hypertrophy by improving cardiac mitophagy to suppress the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Semaglutide may be a novel potential option for intervention of cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload.

Oral semaglutide has potent anti-hyperglycemic efficacy in phase III trials. However, the complicated dosing instructions hamper to use this drug; therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes in a real-world clinical setting. In this multi-center retrospective observational study, we analyzed subjects with type 2 diabetes newly treated with an oral semaglutide for >6 months at four medical centers located in Sapporo, Japan. The changes in glycated hemoglobin, body weight, and other metabolic parameters were evaluated and any adverse event leading to semaglutide discontinuation were recorded from February 2021 to December 2022. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center (UMIN000050583). Of 543 subjects who met the inclusion criteria, data for 434 subjects (age 55.5 ± 12.6 years; body mass index 29.6 ± 6.0 kg/m2) were analyzed. After a 6 months of observation period, semaglutide 3 mg, 7 mg, or 14 mg was used by 55 (12.7%), 241 (55.5%), and 138 (31.8%) of subjects, respectively. Both glycated hemoglobin and body weight significantly improved: 7.65 ± 1.11% to 6.88 ± 0.91% (p < 0.001) and 80.2 ± 19.2 kg to 77.6 ± 19.2 kg (p < 0.001), respectively. Efficacy was also confirmed in the subgroup switched from other anti-hyperglycemic agents, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. In total, 154 subjects had symptomatic gastrointestinal symptoms and 39 (7.2%) were discontinued semaglutide due to the adverse events. None of the participants experienced severe hypoglycemic events. Oral semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes improved glycemic control and body weight in a real-world clinical setting.

Abstract Background Mitochondria are essential organelles involved in cellular energy production. Changes in mitochondrial function can lead to dysfunction and cell death in aging and age-related disorders. Recent research suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction is closely linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist has gained interest as a potential treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of GLP-1R-related agonists are not yet fully understood. Methods In this study, we explores the effects of early treatment with PT320, a sustained release formulation of the GLP-1R agonist Exenatide, on mitochondrial functions and morphology in a progressive PD mouse model, the MitoPark (MP) mouse. Results Our findings demonstrate that administration of a clinically translatable dose of PT320 ameliorates the reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase expression, lowers reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and inhibits mitochondrial cytochrome c release during nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation in MP mice. PT320 treatment significantly preserved mitochondrial function and morphology but did not influence the reduction in mitochondria numbers during PD progression in MP mice. Genetic analysis indicated that the cytoprotective effect of PT320 is attributed to a reduction in the expression of mitochondrial fission protein 1 (Fis1) and an increase in the expression of optic atrophy type 1 (Opa1), which is known to play a role in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis and decreasing cytochrome c release through remodeling of the cristae. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the early administration of PT320 shows potential as a neuroprotective treatment for PD, as it can preserve mitochondrial function. Through enhancing mitochondrial health by regulating Opa1 and Fis1, PT320 presents a new neuroprotective therapy in PD. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggest that combination therapy with sodium–glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is associated with improvement in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels. However, a systematic review of available real-world evidence may facilitate clinical decision-making in the real-world scenario. This meta-analysis assessed the safety and effectiveness of combinations of SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs with a focus on their cardioprotective effects along with glucose-lowering ability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a real-world setting. Methods Electronic searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, PROQuest, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases. Qualitative analyses and meta-analyses were performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute SUMARI software package and Review Manager v5.4, respectively. Results The initial database search yielded 1445 articles; of these, 13 were included in this study. The analyses indicated that SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs combinations were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality when compared with individual therapies (odds ratio [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 [0.41, 0.60]; p

Many individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) do not achieve their management goals. The patient perspective on unmet needs in T1D may guide the role of adjunctive therapies, including glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). A quantitative online survey (n = 133) assessed (1) self-reported demographic and management data, (2) management priorities, satisfaction, and willingness to use adjunctive therapies and (3) conducted a risk-benefit analysis using three masked drug profiles (1.8 mg vs 0.6 mg liraglutide vs placebo). A subgroup of respondents (n = 20) participated in semi-structured interviews to extend upon survey insights. Needs were unmet by current treatment in 28% of surveyed individuals. The greatest unmet needs included (1) glycemia, (2) management-related fatigue, and (3) weight management. Most respondents (94%) indicated that they would use adjunctive therapies. The preferred administration route was daily tablets (66%) followed by weekly injections (32%). Metabolic improvements were most valued (reduction in hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia). Most respondents (94%) preferred the liraglutide risk-benefit profile (1.8 mg, then 0.6 mg) over placebo. Individuals with T1D self-report many unmet needs. While not currently approved in T1D, GLP-1RA properties align with many management priorities reported by individuals with T1D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Potent incretin‐based therapy shows promise for the treatment of obesity along with reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and obesity. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the incretin‐based obesity treatments, once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg, in people with obesity without diabetes. Of the 744 records identified, seven randomized controlled trials (n = 5140) were included. Five studies (n = 3288) investigated semaglutide and two studies (n = 1852) investigated tirzepatide. The treatment effect, shown as placebo‐subtracted difference, on body weight was −15.0% (95% CI, −17.8 to −12.2) with −12.9% (95% CI, −14.7 to −11.1) for semaglutide and −19.2% (95% CI, −22.2 to −16.2) for tirzepatide. The treatment effect on waist circumference was −11.4 cm (95% CI, −13.7 to −9.2) with −9.7 cm (95% CI, −10.8 to −8.5) for semaglutide and −14.6 cm (95% CI, −15.8 to −13.4) for tirzepatide. The adverse events related to semaglutide and tirzepatide were primarily of mild‐to‐moderate severity and mostly gastrointestinal, which was more frequent during the dose‐titration period and leveled off during the treatment period. This emphasizes that once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg induce large reductions in body weight and waist circumference and are generally well‐tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Introduction: Whilst glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP1‐RAs) are effective for treating adolescent obesity, weight loss maintenance (WLM; preventing weight regain) remains a challenge. Our goal was to investigate appetite/satiety hormones and eating behaviours that may predict WLM with exenatide (a GLP1‐RA) versus placebo in adolescents with severe obesity. Methods: Adolescents who had ≥5% body mass index (BMI) reduction with meal replacement therapy were randomized to 52 weeks of once‐weekly exenatide extended release or placebo. In this secondary analysis, eating behaviours and appetite/satiety regulation hormones post‐meal replacement therapy (pre‐randomization to exenatide or placebo) were evaluated as possible predictors of WLM. Percent change in BMI from randomization to 52 weeks served as the primary measure of WLM. Results: The analysis included 66 adolescents (mean age 16.0 years; 47% female). Lower leptin response to meal testing was associated with greater WLM in terms of BMI percent change in those receiving exenatide compared to placebo (p = 0.007) after adjusting for sex, age and BMI. There were no other significant predictors of WLM. Conclusions: Prior to exenatide, lower leptin response to meals was associated with improved WLM with exenatide compared to placebo. The mostly null findings of this study suggest that GLP1‐RA treatment may produce similar WLM for adolescents with obesity regardless of age, BMI, sex and eating behaviours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Combining insulin with a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA) to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) is common. While many studies have investigated concomitant therapy with basal insulin+GLP‐1RA, few have reported on premixed insulin+GLP‐1RA. We aimed to address this gap using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database in England. Methods: This retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching assessed glycaemic levels and other clinical outcomes in people with T2D, comparing biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) + GLP‐1RA with basal insulin (insulin detemir/glargine U100) + GLP‐1RA (from 2006 to 2021). Results: In total, 4770 eligible people were identified; 1511 had a BIAsp 30 + GLP‐1RA regimen and were propensity score‐matched to an equal number receiving basal+GLP‐1RA. There was no significant difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction between cohorts at 6 months (p = 0.15), with a decrease of −1.07 (95% CI: −1.16; −0.98) %‐points (−11.7 mmol/mol [95% CI: −12.7; –10.7]) in the BIAsp 30 + GLP‐1RA cohort, versus −0.97 (95% CI: −1.07; −0.88) %‐points (−10.6 mmol/mol [95% CI: −11.7; –9.6]) in the basal+GLP‐1RA cohort. Body mass index (BMI) decreased by −0.35 kg/m2 (95% CI: −0.52;−0.18) at 6 months with BIAsp 30 + GLP‐1RA, versus −0.72 kg/m2 (95% CI: −0.90;−0.54) with basal+GLP‐1RA (p = 0.003). BMI was influenced by the initiation sequence of GLP‐1RA in relation to insulin (p < 0.0001). Hypoglycaemia rates were low and not significantly different between cohorts. Conclusions: Combining BIAsp 30 + GLP‐1RA provides glycaemic control with no significant difference to that of propensity score‐matched people receiving basal insulin+GLP‐1RA, with no increase in hypoglycaemia risk or weight gain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The mainstay of treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is weight loss. Endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are effective weight loss therapies. This study aims to assess the effect of combining EGR with GLP-1RA on liver-related outcomes and weight profile. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected registry of patients with MASLD and compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) who underwent EGR. Patients were categorized as (1) monotherapy: EGR alone and (2) combination therapy: GLP-1RA prescribed within 6 months prior to or after EGR. Outcomes included changes in noninvasive tests of hepatic fibrosis, weight profile, and insulin resistance status at 12 months. Results: Thirty patients (body mass index 40.7 ± 9.3 kg/m2) were included. Of these, 12 patients (40%) underwent EGR monotherapy, and 18 patients (60%) underwent EGR + GLP-1RA combination therapy. Combination therapy group experienced greater improvements in fibrosis compared to monotherapy group (alanine aminotransferase: reduction by 55 ± 23% vs 29 ± 22% (p = 0.008), NAFLD fibrosis score: reduction by 181 ± 182% vs 30 ± 83% (p = 0.04), liver stiffness measurement on transient elastography: reduction by 54 ± 12% vs 14 ± 45% (p = 0.05)). There were greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance in combination therapy compared to monotherapy (p < 0.05). At 12 months, the combination therapy group experienced 18.2 ± 6.6% TWL, while monotherapy group experienced 9.6 ± 3.3% TWL (p = 0.004). Conclusions: In patients with MASLD and cACLD, combination of EGR with GLP-1RA is associated with greater improvements in hepatic fibrosis, weight profile, and insulin resistance compared to EGR alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mitochondria are essential organelles involved in cellular energy production. Changes in mitochondrial function can lead to dysfunction and cell death in aging and age-related disorders. Recent research suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction is closely linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist has gained interest as a potential treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of GLP-1R-related agonists are not yet fully understood. Methods: In this study, we explores the effects of early treatment with PT320, a sustained release formulation of the GLP-1R agonist Exenatide, on mitochondrial functions and morphology in a progressive PD mouse model, the MitoPark (MP) mouse. Results: Our findings demonstrate that administration of a clinically translatable dose of PT320 ameliorates the reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase expression, lowers reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and inhibits mitochondrial cytochrome c release during nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation in MP mice. PT320 treatment significantly preserved mitochondrial function and morphology but did not influence the reduction in mitochondria numbers during PD progression in MP mice. Genetic analysis indicated that the cytoprotective effect of PT320 is attributed to a reduction in the expression of mitochondrial fission protein 1 (Fis1) and an increase in the expression of optic atrophy type 1 (Opa1), which is known to play a role in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis and decreasing cytochrome c release through remodeling of the cristae. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the early administration of PT320 shows potential as a neuroprotective treatment for PD, as it can preserve mitochondrial function. Through enhancing mitochondrial health by regulating Opa1 and Fis1, PT320 presents a new neuroprotective therapy in PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a post hoc analysis of two clinical trials, SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6, which examined the effects of semaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The analysis aimed to determine the impact of semaglutide compared to a placebo based on baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. The findings indicate that semaglutide reduced the risk of MACE, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke, across various baseline HbA1c values. The study was conducted ethically and with participant consent. The article also mentions that semaglutide effectively reduces HbA1c and body weight compared to a placebo, regardless of baseline HbA1c levels. The analysis suggests that semaglutide can be used to reduce MACE in individuals with type 2 diabetes, regardless of their HbA1c values, aligning with current guidelines. The study was funded by Novo Nordisk. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: Exenatide (twice daily) has been used as a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in patients with diabetes with inadequate glycemic control for over a decade. In this paper, we aimed to investigate the long-term glycemic control and change in body weight in patients treated with exenatide. Methods: A total of 287 patients who were treated with exenatide twice daily between 2012 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and body weight were assessed over time after exenatide administration. The administered insulin dosage and metabolic parameters were documented. The baseline data were compared over a period of 3 months to 3 years. Results: The study included 101 (36%) males and 186 (64%) females, with an average age of 56.4 ± 10.7 years. The baseline HbA1c level was 8.0 ± 1.8%, and the body mass index was 38.8 ± 5.9 kg/m². The HbA1c level had decreased by 1.29% from the baseline at 3 months (P < .001), which continued up to 3 years (−0.63%, P = .010). During the 3-year period, body weight continued to decrease significantly (−12.1, P < .001). Glucose levels were significantly reduced, but the lipid levels and glomerular filtration rate after exenatide treatment were similar. Notably, exenatide administration resulted in a decrease in insulin dosage for patients treated with insulin. Conclusion: Exenatide therapy produced continued improvements in glycemic control and progressive weight loss for 3 years in patients with diabetes in a real-life setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study provides a reference for healthcare organizations in the selection and rational use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), based on the Rapid Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (Second Edition). Methods: According to the Rapid Guide for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (Second Edition) released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for drug information. We systematically evaluated 7 GLP-1RAs marketed in China for safety, efficacy, economy, pharmacological properties, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method. Results: The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were semaglutide (71.5 points), dulaglutide (68.9 points), liraglutide (68.7 points), exenatide (62.5 points), lixisenatide (59.9 points), polyethylene glycol loxenatide (55.9 points), and benaglutide (45.1 points). Conclusion: When a healthcare organization introduces GLP-1RAs to their hospital, they can refer to the assessment results and use the top three recommended medications: semaglutide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]