Search

Copyright of SKEI - International Interdisciplinary Journal / Medunarodni Interdisciplinarni Casopis is the property of University Vitez, Bosnia & Herzegovina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The growth of inventive activity in the NBC Protection Troops is accompanied by an increase in requests for examination, leading to a delay in the process of considering patent applications at the Federal Institute of Industrial Property of Rospatent. The aim of this work is to summarize the common mistakes in the claim and the Specifications of the inventions in the NBC Protection Troops. Materials and research methods. Examination requests for applications for inventions were analyzed, for which positive decisions were eventually received, i. e. the delay in their consideration was not due to the lack of a technical solution. In the application materials, the most typical mistakes were identified and summarized with the references to regulatory documents. The provisions of these documents were explained in the text of the article and supported by references to the work of patent law specialists. The results of the study. The main mistakes detected at the stage of formal examination are made in the application, description of drawings and in the claims. At the stage of substantive examination, the experts pay attention to the applicants' misunderstanding of the rules for drawing up the claims and sections of the description that substantiate the claims. The «Background of the Invention» section is usually presented in the form of a review, in which the closest analogue is not analyzed; the technical result is not indicated; examples revealing the implementation of the claimed invention are not complete. Discussion of results and conclusions. Any mistakes detected at the stage of formal expertise can be easily corrected with careful attention to the preparation of application documents. The mistakes identified at the stage of substantive examination are of a systemic nature. They are based on the stereotypes of a specialist, who can not see patentable technical solutions and cannot plan them. It is possible to correct this situation by training young specialists in the field of legal protection and protection of inventions, utility models, industrial designs and methods of their use, even before they start their main activities. It is possible also to accompany such trainings with the study of the fundamentals of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Patenting itself must be carried out within the framework of the organization's patent policy.

Copyright of Taiwan Law Review is the property of Angle Publishing Co., Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Intellectual Property / Dusevne Vlastnictvo is the property of Industrial Property Office of the Slovak Republic and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Propiedad Inmaterial is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia, Centro de Estudios de la Propriedad Intelectual and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Мета. Проаналізувати помилки, які допускають сторони в документах про передачу прав на сорти рослин при неправильному застосуванні заявниками та авторами сорту норм чинного законодавства в частині складання документів заявки на сорт рослини та додатків до неї; впорядкувати та розробити практичні рекомендації при укладанні правочинів про передачу прав на сорти рослин. Результати. Виявлено, що чинним законодавством передбачено укладання тільки двох видів договорів у сфері охорони прав на сорти рослин, якими не повністю забезпечуються права та інтереси сторін. Укладання договору про передачу права на подання заявки на сорт рослин є інструментом захисту прав заявників та підставою для прийняття її уповноваженим органом. Висновки. Оформлення документів заявки без помилок сприяє швидкому проведенню формальної експертизи та прийняттю позитивного для заявника рішення. Правильне оформлення трудових угод між селекціонером (автором) та роботодавцем сприяє захисту прав кожного з учасників таких угод.