Search

In order to objectively and accurately assess the airborne flight posture in the trajectory-based operation (TBO) mode, a flight posture assessment method based on complex network and MFIM-TOPSIS is proposed. Firstly, the precise protection zone of different aircraft types is established by analyzing the risk of lateral collision between aircraft, and the flight conflict network is constructed by using the three-dimensional velocity barrier method, which is close to the TBO air operation environment, based on which six network topology indexes, such as total node degree, average point strength and network density, are selected to build the flight attitude assessment index system. To weaken the influence of the assessment subjectivity, an interaction matrix that can reflect subjective factors-objective factors is proposed. The maximum information coefficient is used to improve the coding of interaction matrix. Finally the flight attitude level status is assessed by using the superiority-disadvantage solution distance method. The simulation analysis and the example analysis of Takasaki Airport show that the evaluation model can accurately assess the air traffic situation and provide auxiliary information for controllers' decision making and command.

Copyright of Systems Engineering & Electronics is the property of Journal of Systems Engineering & Electronics Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aiming at the problems of difficult handling of three-dimensional flight conflicts and unfair distribution of resolution costs, we propose a multi-aircraft conflict resolution method based on the network cooperative game. Firstly, we establish a flight conflict network model with aircraft as nodes and the conflict relationship between node pairs as edges. After that, we propose a comprehensive network index that can evaluate the effect of resolution strategy. Based on the concept of "nucleolus solution", we establish a conflict network alliance with all nodes as participants, and balance the interests of all participants through the resolution cost function. In order to improve the timeliness of the method, we propose two optimization methods: adjusting high-priority nodes and customizing the initial resolution scheme. Finally, we combine the NSGA-II algorithm to solve the optimal conflict resolution scheme. The simulation results show that our method can adjust 10 aircraft in 15.17 s and resolve 12 flight conflicts in a complex conflict scenario containing 40 aircraft; our method reduces the resolution cost by more than 22.1% on average compared with the method without considering the resolution cost. The method ensures both the conflict resolution capability and the reduction in resolution cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aiming at the problems of difficult handling of three-dimensional flight conflicts and unfair distribution of resolution costs, we propose a multi-aircraft conflict resolution method based on the network cooperative game. Firstly, we establish a flight conflict network model with aircraft as nodes and the conflict relationship between node pairs as edges. After that, we propose a comprehensive network index that can evaluate the effect of resolution strategy. Based on the concept of “nucleolus solution”, we establish a conflict network alliance with all nodes as participants, and balance the interests of all participants through the resolution cost function. In order to improve the timeliness of the method, we propose two optimization methods: adjusting high-priority nodes and customizing the initial resolution scheme. Finally, we combine the NSGA-II algorithm to solve the optimal conflict resolution scheme. The simulation results show that our method can adjust 10 aircraft in 15.17 s and resolve 12 flight conflicts in a complex conflict scenario containing 40 aircraft; our method reduces the resolution cost by more than 22.1% on average compared with the method without considering the resolution cost. The method ensures both the conflict resolution capability and the reduction in resolution cost.