1. Accounting for interspecies and intraspecies variation in swimming performance for fish passage solutions.
- Author
-
Crawford, Rachel M. B., Gee, Eleanor, Hicks, Brendan, Nolte, Dana, Dupont, Deborah, and Franklin, Paul A.
- Abstract
Across the globe, there are millions of in‐stream structures that fragment the world's river networks, acting as barriers that can impede the movements of fish. Designing effective solutions to accommodate fish communities requires information about the swimming abilities and behaviours of all species. This should account for different swimming modes, abilities, behaviours, and niches. We investigated the swimming speeds of nine migratory New Zealand species to assess both inter‐ and intraspecies variation. We then calculated maximum traversable speeds for culverts of a given length, based on the endurance abilities of our lowest performing species (Galaxias maculatus). Our findings reveal significant inter‐ and intraspecies variation in swimming speeds. Among the species studied, Galaxias brevipinnis, Galaxias argenteus, and Galaxias postvectis were the strongest swimmers. In contrast, Galaxias maculatus was one of the weakest swimmers. Body length positively correlated with Umax indicating that fish passage barriers select against the weakest swimming species, as well as smaller individuals within a species. Maximum water speeds in a culvert must be lower than 0.3 m s−1, the previously assumed standard rule‐of‐thumb for New Zealand, to provide adequate passage for a high proportion of a weak‐swimming indicator species (Galaxias maculatus). Synthesis and applications. Previous maximum traversable water speeds for fish passage designs have been based on average swimming ability, but this approach only enables fish that are better than the average swimmers of their species to overcome barriers. This study highlights the importance of evidence‐based designs for successful fish passage solutions to account for the ability of all fish. By considering differences between and within species, rather than assuming a ‘one‐size‐fits‐all’ approach we can develop more effective passage solutions that better preserve fish communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF