1. Finger and foot tapping as alternative outcomes of upper and lower extremity function in multiple sclerosis
- Author
-
Bibiana Bielekova, Makoto Tanigawa, Irene Cortese, John K. Park, Peter Kosa, and Jason Stein
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,finger and foot tapping ,Multiple sclerosis ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,medicine ,Screening tool ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,clinical trial ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,disability scales ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,030104 developmental biology ,Physical therapy ,Original Article ,Neurology (clinical) ,progressive MS ,outcome measurement ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Foot (unit) - Abstract
Background While magnetic resonance imaging contrast-enhancing lesions represent an excellent screening tool for disease-modifying treatments in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), this biomarker is insensitive for testing therapies against compartmentalized inflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, alternative sensitive outcomes are needed. Using machine learning, clinician-acquired disability scales can be combined with timed measures of neurological functions such as walking speed (e.g. 25-foot walk; 25FW) or fine finger movements (e.g. 9-hole peg test; 9HPT) into sensitive composite clinical scales, such as the recently developed combinatorial, weight-adjusted disability scale (CombiWISE). Ideally, these complementary simplified measurements of certain neurological functions could be performed regularly at patients’ homes using smartphones. Objectives We asked whether tests amenable to adaptation to smartphone technology, such as finger and foot tapping have comparable sensitivity and specificity to current non-clinician-acquired disability measures. Results We observed that finger and foot tapping can differentiate RRMS and progressive MS in a cross-sectional study and can also measure yearly and two-year disease progression in the latter, with better power (based on z-scores) in comparison to currently utilized 9HPT and 25FW. Conclusions Replacing the 9HPT and 25FW with simplified tests broadly adaptable to smartphone technology may enhance the power of composite scales for progressive MS.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF