Purpose: Building on the foundational work in risk management and hedging by Froot et al. (1993) and Smith and Stulz (1985), the academic landscape has evolved significantly. However, despite the groundwork laid by these seminal studies, there remains a distinct gap in fully capturing the breadth of contemporary research in the field. Given the rapid changes in the current economic, characterized by extraordinary volatility and emerging global dilemmas, the need for sophisticated risk management strategies has intensified, underscoring the critical importance of this area for ongoing scholarly investigation. This evolving context sets the stage for this research, which is driven by three key questions: (1) How are financial hedging strategies and operational strategies integrated in organizations? (2) What factors influence the decision to use financial hedging? And (3) What operational hedging strategies are discussed in risk management activities? By analyzing these issues, the primary objective is to identify directions for future research in corporate risk management. It seeks to uncover new insights that could fuel subsequent academic investigations with the goal of significantly enhancing our understanding of risk management strategies in today's complex business environment. Additionally, the research endeavors to showcase empirically tested strategies, offering pragmatic insights poised to refine and inform decision-making processes in real-world scenarios. Methodology: The methodology of this study employs an in-depth bibliometric analysis, focusing on key articles from the last decade in the field of "Business Economics", as retrieved from the Web of Science database, ensuring a comprehensive overview of contemporary trends and discourses. The VOSviewer used for this analysis provides a graphical representation of bibliometric data using a similarity matrix and a metric called "strength of association," which facilitates an intuitive understanding of complex relationships within the data (Van Eck and Waltman 2007). This initial phase aims to uncover significant research gaps and emerging trends in the field of corporate risk management. Subsequently, the study expands into a comprehensive literature review, incorporating a wide range of studies to further investigate the integration of financial and operational hedging strategies in organizations, with the goal of providing a deeper understanding of current practices and potential research directions. Results: The bibliometric mapping revealed distinct clusters of research, providing insights into core areas of risk management. Recent literature on hedging has demonstrated its diverse role in reducing uncertainty for multinational firms (Fisch and Puhr, 2022), enhancing firm value (Jiang and Feng, 2022), and supporting liquidity management for financially constrained firms (Shin and Pyo, 2019). Moreover, financial risk research has encompassed a range of strategies, including managing currency uncertainty (Fisch and Puhr, 2022), leveraging financial instruments and debt for value creation (Hadian and Adaoglu, 2020), and evaluating the benefits of cross-commodity hedging (Kar and Khandelwal, 2020). In addition, operational hedging has been introduced as a complementary tool by Fisch and Puhr (2022) and Laing et al. (2020). Almansur et al. (2020) focus on vertical integration, suggesting that firms expand their operations along the supply chain to mitigate input price risk. The study highlights key findings that suggest new directions for research, particularly the impact of hedging strategies on broad financial indicators such as the Sharpe ratio. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing emerging and evolving risks, including issues related to illiquid markets, regional price differentials, increased volatility in commodity prices, and climate-related concerns such as carbon emissions. It also highlights the growing need to integrate environmental, social and governance factors into risk management practices. These emerging areas, which may not have been thoroughly covered in the current literature, represent significant gaps that future research needs to address in order to advance the discussion on corporate hedging. This study deepens the understanding of the integration of financial and operational hedging strategies in organizations, highlighting the importance of flexibility and strategic coordination to improve corporate risk management. It makes a significant contribution to the literature by introducing a bibliometric analysis in this area and outlining new directions for future research. In terms of practical implications, it guides managers in formulating or refining hedging strategies, highlights effective tactics that have been validated, and suggests innovative and underexplored approaches for integrated management of financial and operational risks. Research limitations: Although the study covers a wide range of existing literature, it recognizes the limitations of relying solely on published research, which may not fully capture current practices and emerging challenges in corporate hedging. Originality: To the best of the author's knowledge, this study pioneers the fusion of bibliometric analysis with a comprehensive literature review in the area of corporate hedging. This innovative methodology not only maps the existing research terrain, but also identifies critical pathways for future academic inquiry. In doing so, it provides an essential foundation for advancing the understanding of risk management strategies. In addition, this dual-analytic approach allows for the dissection of research trends, the identification of seminal works, and the highlighting of underrepresented topics, providing a panoramic view that could stimulate a diverse array of future research topics within the intricate field of risk management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]