Search

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the in vivo spread of iodinated contrast following injections in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath in anesthetized dogs via computed tomography. Secondarily, the time of performing each block was compared. ANIMALS 6 adult, purpose-bred Beagles. METHODS In a prospective crossover study, dogs were administered injections either in the rectus sheath or transversus abdominis fascial plane in the same manner as a rectus sheath block (RSB) or TAP block using dilute iodinated contrast. Computed tomography scans were performed immediately following injection (time [T]-0) and at 3, 9, 18, and 30 minutes postinjection. Data regarding the spread in the cranial-caudal and lateral directions and time to perform the injections were compared between the 2 techniques using paired or 2-sample t tests. RESULTS There was significantly greater spread in the cranial-caudal direction in the RSB group (62.9 ± 6.4 mm vs 54.8 ± 6.8 mm at T30; P = .009), whereas spread in the lateral direction was greater in the TAP group (37.3 ± 3.0 mm vs 48.6 ± 6.1 mm at T30; P < .0001). The RSB injection was performed in a more time-efficient manner than TAP injection (48.2 ± 3.2 seconds vs 82.3 ± 8.7 seconds; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS In living subjects, RSB injections resulted in greater cranial-caudal spread while TAP injections resulted in greater lateral spread. Rectus sheath block injections were performed in a more time efficient manner compared to a single point TAP injection in anesthetized dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The RSB was performed in a more time-efficient manner and would likely result in greater coverage of the ventral midline. The TAP block would likely result in more significant regional anesthetic coverage of the lateral abdominal wall. Further studies are required to determine the degree of the clinical significance of these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Now, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is widely used in various thoracolumbar surgeries. It has unique advantages: simple and convenient operation, low safety risks, and reduced opioid use. The ESPB is used in thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, and spinal surgery. There are also relevant research reports on postoperative analgesia during general anesthesia surgery. This article searches the PubMed and Web of Science databases to find and screen relevant studies on ESPB since 2019 and retrospectively summarizes the current indications of ESPB. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk tool. The results showed that the current research on ESPB generally provides low-level clinical evidence. The complex anatomy of the erector spinae muscles is both responsible for its unique advantages and restricts its development. Few anatomical studies have clearly and completely demonstrated the diffusion relationship of local anesthetics among the anatomical structures of the erector spinal muscles. The uncontrollability of the diffusion plane prevents ESPB from being applied on a wider scale with a high level of evidence. To further clarify the scope of application of ESPB and achieve the best analgesic effect, in the future, we should focus on the unique anatomical course and distribution of the erector spinal muscles and their fascia and nerves. It is necessary to combine anatomical, imaging, and histological methods to obtain high-quality evidence to guide clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) or erector spinae plane (ESP) block reduces postsurgical pain in patients who underwent kidney transplantation surgeries. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of both modalities in terms of duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with postoperative fentanyl consumption. Methods: We conducted a randomised study and analysed 60 patients posted for elective live-related kidney transplantation surgery. They were randomised into two groups. Group M patients received ITM, whereas Group E patients received ESP block. We standardised the postoperative analgesia for both groups with intravenous fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was to compare the quality of analgesia using the numerical rating scale score between the groups. The secondary outcome was to observe the effect of both modalities on the duration of analgesia, postoperative fentanyl consumption, rescue analgesics requirement, catheter-related bladder discomfort and any complications. Results: We found significantly lower pain scores at rest and while coughing in Group M at all time intervals, except at 24 h while coughing. The mean time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group M than in Group E (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative consumption of total fentanyl (P = 0.065) and rescue analgesia in both groups. In Group M, there was significantly more nausea, vomiting and pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusions: ITM provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia at the cost of higher side effects than ESP block.

This prospective anatomical study aimed to establish an ultrasound-guided technique to the quadratus lumborum (QL) plane in sheep cadavers. Thirteen cadavers, weighing less than 117 kg, were included. In phase 1, one cadaver underwent dissection and two cadavers underwent 3D computed tomographic reconstruction for anatomical evaluation of the thoracolumbar region. In phase 2, two cadavers were used to compare two ultrasound techniques to the QL plane: lateral to the QL muscle with a transversal approach (LQL) and transmuscular between QL and psoas muscles with a longitudinal approach (TQL). For LQL, the reference was the first lumbar transverse process, whereas for TQL, it was the intertransverse region between the first and second lumbar vertebrae. The needle was advanced in-plane towards the specific target for each technique and a total of four injections were performed using 0.4 ml kg−1 of a dye-lidocaine solution. In phase 3, 10 cadavers received bilateral LQL injections (n = 20). All cadavers were then dissected to evaluate spread of dye. In phase 2, following LQL injections, no dye was observed in undesired locations; however, the dye was noted in the retroperitoneal space (1/2) after TQL injections. In phase 3, the 13th thoracic, first, second, third lumbar nerves, and sympathetic trunk segments were stained in 80%, 95%, 100%, 45% and 35% of the injections, respectively. In conclusion, the LQL technique was feasible, allowing staining of the spinal nerves innervating the cranial abdomen in sheep cadavers. Further studies in live animals are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) or erector spinae plane (ESP) block reduces postsurgical pain in patients who underwent kidney transplantation surgeries. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of both modalities in terms of duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with postoperative fentanyl consumption. Methods: We conducted a randomised study and analysed 60 patients posted for elective live-related kidney transplantation surgery. They were randomised into two groups. Group M patients received ITM, whereas Group E patients received ESP block. We standardised the postoperative analgesia for both groups with intravenous fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was to compare the quality of analgesia using the numerical rating scale score between the groups. The secondary outcome was to observe the effect of both modalities on the duration of analgesia, postoperative fentanyl consumption, rescue analgesics requirement, catheter-related bladder discomfort and any complications. Results: We found significantly lower pain scores at rest and while coughing in Group M at all time intervals, except at 24 h while coughing. The mean time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group M than in Group E (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative consumption of total fentanyl (P = 0.065) and rescue analgesia in both groups. In Group M, there was significantly more nausea, vomiting and pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusions: ITM provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia at the cost of higher side effects than ESP block. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nerve transfer surgery has emerged as a promising approach to restoring function in paralyzed muscles. The trapezius plane block (TPB) blocks the thoracic branches of the posterior primary rami, providing extended analgesia in nerve transfer surgeries. The case report describes the analgesia profiling of a young man who suffered a traumatic pan-brachial plexus injury and underwent a spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve transfer. TPB was utilized as a part of multimodal analgesia. TPB represents an advancement in regional anesthesia, providing extended analgesia and reducing opioid consumption. TPB can promote patient comfort and facilitate early mobilization.

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block spread can be unpredictable. We previously improved the spread of ESP injection by addition of retrolaminar (RL) injection. However, it is not clear whether spread at high thoracic levels is similar to spread at midthoracic levels. Our primary objective was to demonstrate that craniocaudal dye spread was equivalent after combined ESP and RL injection using a 19 G Tuohy needle at the third (T3) and sixth (T6) vertebrae in soft embalmed Thiel cadavers. We randomised 20 combined ESP and RL injections to the T3 and T6 vertebral levels on both sides of 10 prone Thiel cadavers. A 3–8 MHz transducer was placed in the paramedian sagittal plane and a single anaesthetist injected 10 ml dye onto the transverse process, then 10 ml dye onto the laminae of T3 or T6. Cadavers were dissected 24 h later. Mean (sd) craniocaudal spread of dye after combined ESP + RL injection at T3 and T6 vertebral levels was equivalent: 8.6 (1.8) vs 8.7 (2.3) levels, respectively; difference (90% confidence interval): –0.1 (–1.4 to 1.6), P =0.904. Dye extended uniformly, cranially and caudally, from the point of injection. A 3D prosection created from a Thiel cadaver confirmed that the dorsal ramus emerges from the costotransverse foramen deep to the intertransverse ligament within the retro-superior costotransverse ligament space. Combined ESP and RL block in six patients before mastectomy achieved extensive anterior, lateral, and posterior chest wall paraesthesia over four to six dermatomes. Combined ESP and RL injections showed equivalent and consistent spread at T3 and T6 injection sites. A pilot study confirmed translation to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significant acute postoperative pain remains prevalent among patients who undergo truncal surgery and is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged patient recovery, and increased healthcare costs. The provision of high-quality postoperative analgesia is an important component of postoperative care, particularly within enhanced recovery programmes. Regional anaesthetic techniques have become increasingly prevalent within multimodal analgesic regimens and the widespread adoption of ultrasonography has facilitated the development of novel fascial plane blocks. The number of described fascial plane blocks has increased significantly over the past decade, leading to a burgeoning area of clinical investigation. Their applications are increasing, and truncal fascial plane blocks are increasingly recommended as part of procedure-specific guidelines. Some fascial plane blocks have been shown to be more efficacious than others, with favourable side-effect profiles compared with neuraxial analgesia, and are increasingly utilised in breast, thoracic, and other truncal surgery. However, use of these blocks is debated in regional anaesthesia circles because of limitations in our understanding of their mechanisms of action. This narrative review evaluates available evidence for the analgesic efficacy of the most commonly practised fascial plane blocks in breast, thoracic, and abdominal truncal surgery, in particular their efficacy compared with systemic analgesia, alternative blocks, and neuraxial techniques. We also highlight areas where investigations are ongoing and suggest priorities for original investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nerve transfer surgery has emerged as a promising approach to restoring function in paralyzed muscles. The trapezius plane block (TPB) blocks the thoracic branches of the posterior primary rami, providing extended analgesia in nerve transfer surgeries. The case report describes the analgesia profiling of a young man who suffered a traumatic pan-brachial plexus injury and underwent a spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve transfer. TPB was utilized as a part of multimodal analgesia. TPB represents an advancement in regional anesthesia, providing extended analgesia and reducing opioid consumption. TPB can promote patient comfort and facilitate early mobilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. Despite the proven clinical effectiveness of the transverse abdominal plane block (TAP block), the factors affecting the distribution of local anesthetic in the fascial case have not been fully studied, and there are no clear recommendations regarding the choice of the volume of local anesthetic taking into account anthropometry.The objective was to identify anthropometric factors influencing the choice of an adequate volume of local anesthetic for performing a TAP block.Materials and methods. In the pathology department, 40 upper and 40 lateral TAP blocks were performed in 20 corpses using ultrasound navigation. On the right side, 20 ml (block group A) of diamond green dye solution was injected, on the left side - 30 ml (block group B). The dependence of the area of distribution of the dye solution on the volume of the body, weight and height of the corpse was investigated. The analysis of the effect of damage in the execution zone on the area of dye distribution was carried out.Results. In the group B, the dye in 100 % of cases (n=18) spread to the nerve passage areas Th6 – Th9 in the upper TAP block and Th9 – L1 in the lateral TAP block. In group A, in 38.8 % of cases (n=7), the dye did not spread to the Th8-Th9 nerve passage area with the upper TAP block, as well as to the Th10 and Th12–L1 passage areas with the lateral TAP block. An inverse correlation of the growth and the dye distribution area was revealed (p < 0.01). In all unfixed corpses whose height exceeded 179 cm, the dye could not compromise all the zones of passage of nerve structures. Tissue damage in the area of the block limited the spread of the dye.Conclusion. Adequate distribution of local anesthetic depends on the patient’s height. With the height of >179 cm, 20 ml may not be enough to perform a TAP block, and

Copyright of Agri: Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology / Türk Algoloji (Ağrı) Derneği'nin Yayın Organıdır is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background Classic neuraxial techniques, such as thoracic epidural anesthesia, or alternative approaches like the paravertebral block, are not indicated in cardiac surgery due to increased bleeding risk. To provide satisfactory analgesia without the need for excessive opioid use, novel ultrasound techniques gained popularity and are of growing interest. The pectoralis nerve block II (PECS II) has been shown to provide good postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy and might also be suitable for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Methods In a single center, prospective, triple-blinded, two-group randomized trial, 60 patients undergoing elective, unilateral minimal invasive cardiac surgery will be randomized to receive a PECS II with 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% (intervention group) or sodium chloride 0.9% (placebo group). The primary outcome parameter is the overall opioid demand given as intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during the first 24 h after extubation. Secondary endpoints are the visual analog scale (VAS) 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after extubation, the Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) after 24 h, the interval until extubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) discharge within 24 h, as well as the length of hospital stay (LOS). Discussion This prospective randomized, controlled, and triple-blinded trial aims to assess if a PECS II with ropivacaine 0.5% helps to decrease the opioid demand in the first 24 h and increases postoperative pain control after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Trial registration www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu ; EudraCT Nr: 2021–005452-11; Lukas Gasteiger MD, November 18, 2021.

Simple Summary: Ultrasound guidance enables direct visualisation of local anaesthetic spread during the performance of regional anaesthetic techniques, thus improving their accuracy and effectiveness while minimising their complications. In human patients receiving thoracic analgesia, a new regional anaesthetic technique, named retrolaminar block, has a lower complication risk when compared with the gold standard, thoracic paravertebral block. The aim of this study was to develop an ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar retrolaminar technique to provide thoracolumbar analgesia in dogs. Another aim was to compare the distribution of contrast solution between the ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided techniques in canine cadavers, using computed tomography. Ten canine cadavers were randomised to receive either an ultrasound-guided or a landmark-guided retrolaminar injection of 0.6 mL/kg of iodinated contrast solution in each hemithorax at the level of the twelfth thoracic vertebra. The injectate spread in a similar manner in the retrolaminar space and the space surrounding the intervertebral foramina, while minimal spread was noted in the paravertebral space. One of the landmark-guided injections failed to spread, thus highlighting the importance of ultrasound guidance in improving outcomes in regional anaesthetic techniques. Further studies are warranted to clarify the role of the ultrasound-guided retrolaminar technique in the management of thoracolumbar pain in dogs. The retrolaminar block was developed in humans as an easier and safer alternative to the thoracic paravertebral block. This study aims to describe an ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar retrolaminar injection in canine cadavers and compare the injectate distribution between a landmark-guided and an ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar retrolaminar technique using computed tomography. Ten canine cadavers were randomised to receive two injections each of 0.6 mL/kg of iodinated contrast at the level of the twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12): a landmark-guided retrolaminar injection was performed on one hemithorax (group B, n = 10) and an ultrasound-guided on the other hemithorax (group U, n = 10). Groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The median (range) spread of the contrast in the paravertebral space was 0 (0–3) and 1 (0–5) vertebrae in groups B and U, respectively (p = 0.038). The median (range) extent of the spread surrounding the interverbal foramina was 4 (0–5) in group B and 4 (3–5) in group U. The median (range) spread along the retrolaminar space cranial and caudal to T12 was 3 (0–6) retrolaminar segments in group B and 3 (3–4) in group U. The potential of the ultrasound-guided retrolaminar injection to provide analgesia for dogs suffering from thoracolumbar pain should be further investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Classic neuraxial techniques, such as thoracic epidural anesthesia, or alternative approaches like the paravertebral block, are not indicated in cardiac surgery due to increased bleeding risk. To provide satisfactory analgesia without the need for excessive opioid use, novel ultrasound techniques gained popularity and are of growing interest. The pectoralis nerve block II (PECS II) has been shown to provide good postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy and might also be suitable for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Methods: In a single center, prospective, triple-blinded, two-group randomized trial, 60 patients undergoing elective, unilateral minimal invasive cardiac surgery will be randomized to receive a PECS II with 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% (intervention group) or sodium chloride 0.9% (placebo group). The primary outcome parameter is the overall opioid demand given as intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during the first 24 h after extubation. Secondary endpoints are the visual analog scale (VAS) 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after extubation, the Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) after 24 h, the interval until extubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) discharge within 24 h, as well as the length of hospital stay (LOS). Discussion: This prospective randomized, controlled, and triple-blinded trial aims to assess if a PECS II with ropivacaine 0.5% helps to decrease the opioid demand in the first 24 h and increases postoperative pain control after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; EudraCT Nr: 2021–005452-11; Lukas Gasteiger MD, November 18, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We are reporting the anesthetic management of a breast cancer patient with a high risk to undergo general anesthesia using a single shot ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with monitored sedation. Targeted at T4, 20 mL of 0.375% Bupivacaine provided complete surgical anesthesia in 15 minutes. Concurrent sedation was administered with Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol with Entropy monitoring throughout the procedure. The surgery lasted 90 minutes and the patient remained pain free and hemodynamically stable throughout. At the end of the surgery, the patient received 1g Paracetamol intravenously, and did not require any further analgesics other than routinely administered Paracetamol until her discharge from the hospital. On top of the successful execution of our plan, this case was especially interesting as her postoperative analgesia remained completely opioid free. Keywords: Ultrasound, breast cancer, esp block, erector spinae plane block, fascial plane block, pain, analgesia, regional anesthesia.

The retrolaminar block was developed in humans as an easier and safer alternative to the thoracic paravertebral block. This study aims to describe an ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar retrolaminar injection in canine cadavers and compare the injectate distribution between a landmark-guided and an ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar retrolaminar technique using computed tomography. Ten canine cadavers were randomised to receive two injections each of 0.6 mL/kg of iodinated contrast at the level of the twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12): a landmark-guided retrolaminar injection was performed on one hemithorax (group B, n = 10) and an ultrasound-guided on the other hemithorax (group U, n = 10). Groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The median (range) spread of the contrast in the paravertebral space was 0 (0–3) and 1 (0–5) vertebrae in groups B and U, respectively (p = 0.038). The median (range) extent of the spread surrounding the interverbal foramina was 4 (0–5) in group B and 4 (3–5) in group U. The median (range) spread along the retrolaminar space cranial and caudal to T12 was 3 (0–6) retrolaminar segments in group B and 3 (3–4) in group U. The potential of the ultrasound-guided retrolaminar injection to provide analgesia for dogs suffering from thoracolumbar pain should be further investigated.

Background The rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane (RISS) block is a new interfascial block technique that has shown promising results for abdominal and thoracic surgeries. Our objective was to describe the improved analgesia and dermatomal coverage in patients who received bilateral RISS blocks after a major abdominal surgery. Case Twenty-one patients who underwent abdominal surgery received the rhomboid intercostal component of the block at the T5 to T6 levels, and the subserratus component block was performed at the T6 to T9 levels. The RISS blocks provided effective postoperative analgesia. There was a variation in the dermatomal coverage ranging from T3 to T12. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate from pain management. Conclusions The RISS block in abdominal surgery seems to have an important role in perioperative pain management, complementing the multimodal analgesic regimen. To determine the efficacy of the RISS block for abdominal surgery, we need further randomized control trials.

The introduction of regional analgesia in the past decades have revolutionized postoperative pain management for various types of surgery, particularly orthopedic surgery. Nowadays, they are being constantly introduced into other types of surgeries including cardiac surgeries. Neuraxial and paravertebral plexus blocks for cardiac surgery are considered as deep blocks and have the risk of hematoma formation in the setting of anticoagulation associated with cardiac surgeries. Moreover, hemodynamic compromise resulting from sympathectomy in patients with limited cardiac reserve further limits the use of neuraxial techniques. A multitude of fascial plane blocks involving chest wall have been developed, which have been shown the potential to be included in the regional analgesia armamentarium for cardiac surgery. In myofascial plane blocks, the local anesthetic spreads passively and targets the intermediate and terminal branches of intercostal nerves. They are useful as important adjuncts for providing analgesia and are likely to be included in "Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS)" protocols. There are several small studies and case reports that have shown efficacy of the regional blocks in reducing opioid requirements and improving patient satisfaction. This review article discusses the anatomy of various fascial plane blocks, mechanism of their efficacy, and available evidence on outcomes after cardiac surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks (FPBs) versus local infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic non-donor nephrectomy. This study specifically compares the efficacy of FPBs with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus FPBs with dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DXP) and methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) versus surgical site local anesthetic infiltration without FPBs.  Design This is a retrospective cohort study conducted over a five-year period (January 2018-December 2022). Setting The study was conducted in a tertiary care, academic, multi-hospital healthcare system.  Participants Patients who underwent elective radical or partial laparoscopic non-donor nephrectomy were included in the study. Intervention Patients either received preoperative FPBs without intraoperative surgical site local anesthetic infiltration or received surgical site local anesthetic infiltration without FPBs (n = 141) at participating hospitals. Measurements The primary endpoint of this study was postoperative opioid use, measured as oral milligram morphine equivalents (MME). Secondary endpoints included postoperative pain scores, length of hospital stays, and significant adverse events within 30 days. The impact of medications utilized in FPBs was determined by univariate and multivariable analyses with covariates balancing propensity score weighting. Main results Patients undergoing non-donor laparoscopic radical or partial nephrectomy who received FPBs with bupivacaine or ropivacaine plus glucocorticoids DXP and MPA were more likely to be opioid-free 24-48 hours postoperatively compared to those who received FPBs with LB or surgical site local anesthetic infiltration without FPBs (40.5% vs. 30% vs. 13.9%, respectively; p = 0.017). Patients who received FPBs with glucocorticoids also reported the lowest pain scores at rest and with activity 0-12 hours postoperatively as compared to patients who received LB or local infiltration (p = 0.006 and p = 0.014, respectively). Additionally, patients who received FPBs with glucocorticoids received over 30% fewer opioids during the first 48 hours postoperatively compared to patients who received surgical site local anesthetic infiltration alone (30 MME vs. 44 MME, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in total opioid use during the first 48 hours postoperatively between patients who received FPBs with bupivacaine plus glucocorticoids and those who received FPBs with bupivacaine plus LB (mean ratio: 0.91, (95% CI: 0.05 ~ 15.97); p = 0.948). There was also no difference in the length of hospital stays or rate of adverse events between the groups. Conclusion Perioperative FPBs for non-donor laparoscopic nephrectomy using glucocorticoids as an adjuvant to long-acting local anesthetics may decrease postoperative opioid use and reduce pain scores as compared to FPBs with LB or surgical site local anesthetic infiltration. Bupivacaine or ropivacaine combined with DXP and MPA is a safe and effective alternative to LB for FPBs in laparoscopic nephrectomy., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Yale School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB) issued approval (2000029282). Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Sobhani et al.)

Objective: To evaluate the in vivo spread of iodinated contrast following injections in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath in anesthetized dogs via computed tomography. Secondarily, the time of performing each block was compared., Animals: 6 adult, purpose-bred Beagles., Methods: In a prospective crossover study, dogs were administered injections either in the rectus sheath or transversus abdominis fascial plane in the same manner as a rectus sheath block (RSB) or TAP block using dilute iodinated contrast. Computed tomography scans were performed immediately following injection (time [T]-0) and at 3, 9, 18, and 30 minutes postinjection. Data regarding the spread in the cranial-caudal and lateral directions and time to perform the injections were compared between the 2 techniques using paired or 2-sample t tests., Results: There was significantly greater spread in the cranial-caudal direction in the RSB group (62.9 ± 6.4 mm vs 54.8 ± 6.8 mm at T30; P = .009), whereas spread in the lateral direction was greater in the TAP group (37.3 ± 3.0 mm vs 48.6 ± 6.1 mm at T30; P < .0001). The RSB injection was performed in a more time-efficient manner than TAP injection (48.2 ± 3.2 seconds vs 82.3 ± 8.7 seconds; P = .03)., Conclusions: In living subjects, RSB injections resulted in greater cranial-caudal spread while TAP injections resulted in greater lateral spread. Rectus sheath block injections were performed in a more time efficient manner compared to a single point TAP injection in anesthetized dogs., Clinical Relevance: The RSB was performed in a more time-efficient manner and would likely result in greater coverage of the ventral midline. The TAP block would likely result in more significant regional anesthetic coverage of the lateral abdominal wall. Further studies are required to determine the degree of the clinical significance of these results.

Keywords: chest wall; fascial plane block; nerve block; regional anaesthesia; serratus anterior plane; serratus plane block; ultrasound; ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia EN chest wall fascial plane block nerve block regional anaesthesia serratus anterior plane serratus plane block ultrasound ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia 1129 1133 5 07/07/21 20210801 NES 210801 For this instalment in the "Contemporary Classics" series, we celebrate the work of modern pioneers in regional anaesthesia. Eight years and already a classic: marking the rise of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for chest wall surgery Translating research into clinical practice The serratus plane block has been utilised for acute pain management after mastectomy; thoracotomy; thoracoscopy; minimally invasive cardiac surgery; cardiac device implantation; rib fracture; and chest wall trauma, among other clinical indications (Table 1). Chest wall, fascial plane block, nerve block, regional anaesthesia, serratus anterior plane, ultrasound, serratus plane block, ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. [Extracted from the article]

• Erector spinae plane block is increasingly being used for thoracic analgesia • Evidence to support its use for thoracic analgesia is limited • We argue that erector spinae plane block is not useful for thoracic analgesia [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anesthesia and pain management have experienced advances in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block is one of the newest techniques to be described. In the past two years, publications referring to ESP block have increased significantly. The objective of this review is to analyze the articles about ESP block that have been published to date. We performed a search in the main databases and identified 368 articles. After a selection of the relevant articles, 125 studies were found eligible and were included in the review. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anesthetic in the fascial plane, deeper than the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. Many cases of its use have been described with satisfactory results in the treatment of both acute pain and chronic pain. The applicability of the technique covers many clinical scenarios. Of the 98 case reports reviewed, 12 and 87 articles, respectively described the technique as a treatment for chronic pain and acute pain. The single-shot was the most frequently used technique. As described in the articles published to date, the technique is easy to perform and has a low rate of complications. However, despite the effectiveness of the technique, further studies are necessary to obtain more evidence of its actions.

The quadratus lumborum (QL) block is a relatively new FPB and was developed based on the concept of the original TAP block, which uses the triangle of Petit as the main anatomical landmark [[1]]. Keywords: Fascial plane block; Ultrasound; Quadratus lumborum block; Erector spinae plane block EN Fascial plane block Ultrasound Quadratus lumborum block Erector spinae plane block 171 173 3 04/01/22 20220401 NES 220401 In recent years, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks (FPBs) have become commonly used in the field of anesthesia and pain medicine, and the development and modification of new FPB techniques are happening rapidly. One clinical study found that the analgesic effects of the QL block are superior to those of the ultrasound-guided lateral TAP block in patients undergoing Cesarean Section [[2]]. The QL block mainly covers the subcostal, ilioinguinal, and iliohypogastric nerves, which are on the ventral aspect of the QL muscle. [Extracted from the article]

Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall are increasingly popular alternatives to established techniques such as thoracic epidural or paravertebral blockade, as they are simple to perform and have an appealing safety profile. Many different techniques have been described, which can be broadly categorised into anteromedial, anterolateral and posterior chest wall blocks. Understanding the relevant clinical anatomy is critical not only for block performance, but also to match block techniques appropriately with surgical procedures. The sensory innervation of tissues deep to the skin (e.g. muscles, ligaments and bone) can be overlooked, but is often a significant source of pain. The primary mechanism of action for these blocks is a conduction blockade of sensory afferents travelling in the targeted fascial planes, as well as of peripheral nociceptors in the surrounding tissues. A systemic action of absorbed local anaesthetic is plausible but unlikely to be a major contributor. The current evidence for their clinical applications indicates that certain chest wall techniques provide significant benefit in breast and thoracic surgery, similar to that provided by thoracic paravertebral blockade. Their role in trauma and cardiac surgery is evolving and holds great potential. Further avenues of research into these versatile techniques include: optimal local anaesthetic dosing strategies; highquality randomised controlled trials focusing on patient-centred outcomes beyond acute pain; and comparative studies to determine which of the myriad blocks currently on offer should be core competencies in anaesthetic practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anaesthesia in children has evolved rapidly in the last decade. Although it previously consisted of primarily neuraxial techniques, the practice now incorporates advanced peripheral nerve blocks, which were only recently described in adults. These novel blocks provide new avenues for providing opioid-sparing analgesia while minimising invasiveness, and perhaps risk, associated with older techniques. At the same time, established methods, such as infant spinal anaesthesia, under-utilised in the last 20 years, are experiencing a revival. The impetus has been the concern regarding the potential long-term neurocognitive effects of general anaesthesia in the young child. These techniques have expanded from single shot spinal anaesthesia to combined spinal/epidural techniques, which can now effectively provide surgical anaesthesia for procedures below the umbilicus for a prolonged period of time, thereby avoiding the need for general anaesthesia. Continuous 2-chloroprocaine infusions, previously only described for intra-operative regional anaesthesia, have gained popularity as a means of providing prolonged postoperative analgesia in epidural and continuous nerve block techniques. The rapid, liver-independent metabolism of 2-chloroprocaine makes it ideal for prolonged local anaesthetic infusions in neonates and small infants, obviating the increased risk of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity that occurs with amide local anaesthetics. Debate continues over certain practices in paediatric regional anaesthesia. While the rarity of complications makes comparative analyses difficult, data from large prospective registries indicate that providing regional anaesthesia to children while under general anaesthesia appears to be at least as safe as in the sedated or awake patient. In addition, the estimated frequency of serious adverse events demonstrates that regional blocks in children under general anaesthesia are no less safe than in awake adults. In infants, the techniques of direct thoracic epidural placement or caudal placement with cephalad threading each have distinct advantages and disadvantages. As the data cannot support the safety of one technique over the other, the site of epidural insertion remains largely a matter of anaesthetist discretion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane (RISS) block is a new interfascial block technique that has shown promising results for abdominal and thoracic surgeries. Our objective was to describe the improved analgesia and dermatomal coverage in patients who received bilateral RISS blocks after a major abdominal surgery. Case: Twenty-one patients who underwent abdominal surgery received the rhomboid intercostal component of the block at the T5 to T6 levels, and the subserratus component block was performed at the T6 to T9 levels. The RISS blocks provided effective postoperative analgesia. There was a variation in the dermatomal coverage ranging from T3 to T12. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate from pain management. Conclusions: The RISS block in abdominal surgery seems to have an important role in perioperative pain management, complementing the multimodal analgesic regimen. To determine the efficacy of the RISS block for abdominal surgery, we need further randomized control trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been demonstrated in several meta-analyses and it is increasingly being used in clinical practice. However, its mechanism of action is still not fully elucidated. Although initial anatomical studies have suggested the spread of the injectate into the paravertebral space as the main mechanism of action, more recent studies have not consistently demonstrated this. This systematic review was conducted to determine the overall proportion and extent of injectate spread following a thoracic ESPB. PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE were searched. All studies that examined the injectate spread after a thoracic ESPB either through dissection or imaging were included. Excluded were all reviews, studies performed in paediatric patients and non-thoracic ESPBs. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with injectate spread in the erector spinae plane (ESP), paravertebral space (PVS), intercostal space (ICS) and epidural space (ES). This review included 29 studies involving 113 cadavers and 79 volunteers. The proportion of subjects with injectate spread in the ESP, ICS, ES and PVS was 1 (95% confidence interval, 0.97–1), 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38–0.64), 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28–0.5) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.49–0.64) respectively. The mean spread of injectate in the ESP, ICS, ES and PVS were 9.1 (95% CI, 8.0–10.3), 5.6 (95% CI, 4.0–7.3), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.0–5.3) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.4–4.6) spinal levels respectively. Based on this study, the thoracic ESPB consistently led to injectate spread into the ESP compartment but less reliable spread into the PVS, ES and ICS compartments. There is also preliminary evidence that an increased time to assessment may be associated with an increased spread of injectate into the PVS. • Consistent with other literature, this study shows that the likely mechanism of action of the Erector Spinae Plane block is via diffusion or bulk flow to the paravertebral space, epidural space and intercostal space. • However, the spread into these areas is inconsistent, raising questions about the reliability of the block. • Further research is required to understand the relationship between injectate volume, timing of assessment and injectate spread. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anesthesia and pain management have experienced advances in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block is one of the newest techniques to be described. In the past two years, publications referring to ESP block have increased significantly. The objective of this review is to analyze the articles about ESP block that have been published to date. We performed a search in the main databases and identified 368 articles. After a selection of the relevant articles, 125 studies were found eligible and were included in the review. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anesthetic in the fascial plane, deeper than the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. Many cases of its use have been described with satisfactory results in the treatment of both acute pain and chronic pain. The applicability of the technique covers many clinical scenarios. Of the 98 case reports reviewed, 12 and 87 articles, respectively described the technique as a treatment for chronic pain and acute pain. The single-shot was the most frequently used technique. As described in the articles published to date, the technique is easy to perform and has a low rate of complications. However, despite the effectiveness of the technique, further studies are necessary to obtain more evidence of its actions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To examine the analgesic efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block compared with conventional treatment for pain after cardiac surgery in adult patients. Design A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. Setting Single-center tertiary teaching hospital. Participants One hundred and six adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Interventions Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 (ESP block group, n = 53) received ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block with 3 mg/kg of 0.375% ropivacaine before anesthesia induction at the T6 transverse process level. Patients in group 2 (paracetamol and tramadol group, n = 53) received paracetamol (1 gm every 6 hours) and tramadol (50 mg every 8 hours) intravenously in the postoperative period. The primary study outcome was to evaluate pain at rest using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparing NRS scores. Measurements and Main Results The postoperative pain level after extubation and duration of analgesia during which NRS was < 4 of 10 was compared between the groups. The median pain score at rest after extubation in group 1 was 0 of 10 until hour 6, 3 of 10 at hour 8, and 4 of 10 at hours 10 and 12 postextubation. These were significantly less in comparison with group 2 (p = 0.0001). Patients in group 1 had a significantly higher mean duration of analgesia (8.98 ± 0.14 hours), during which NRS was < 4 of 10, compared with group 2 (4.60 ± 0.12 hours) (p = 0.0001). Conclusion ESP block safely provided significantly better pain relief at rest for longer duration as compared to intravenous paracetamol and tramadol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been demonstrated in several meta-analyses and it is increasingly being used in clinical practice. However, its mechanism of action is still not fully elucidated. Although initial anatomical studies have suggested the spread of the injectate into the paravertebral space as the main mechanism of action, more recent studies have not consistently demonstrated this. This systematic review was conducted to determine the overall proportion and extent of injectate spread following a thoracic ESPB., Methods: PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE were searched. All studies that examined the injectate spread after a thoracic ESPB either through dissection or imaging were included. Excluded were all reviews, studies performed in paediatric patients and non-thoracic ESPBs. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with injectate spread in the erector spinae plane (ESP), paravertebral space (PVS), intercostal space (ICS) and epidural space (ES)., Results: This review included 29 studies involving 113 cadavers and 79 volunteers. The proportion of subjects with injectate spread in the ESP, ICS, ES and PVS was 1 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1), 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38-0.64), 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28-0.5) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.49-0.64) respectively. The mean spread of injectate in the ESP, ICS, ES and PVS were 9.1 (95% CI, 8.0-10.3), 5.6 (95% CI, 4.0-7.3), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.0-5.3) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.4-4.6) spinal levels respectively., Conclusion: Based on this study, the thoracic ESPB consistently led to injectate spread into the ESP compartment but less reliable spread into the PVS, ES and ICS compartments. There is also preliminary evidence that an increased time to assessment may be associated with an increased spread of injectate into the PVS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is an efficient perioperative analgesic modality for breast surgeries. SAPB does not block the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves; thus, it does not provide adequate analgesia for the parasternal region and the medial side of the breast. A new parasternal block, the pectointercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) has been developed to overcome this issue., Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the perioperative analgesic effect of using PIFB in addition to SAPB. The primary outcome was to evaluate the postoperative pain score. The secondary outcomes were to assess perioperative opioid requirements, hemodynamic stability, and the satisfaction of the patient and surgeon., Study Design: The current study was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. The current study was registered at the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202001789968542) and was designed after obtaining ethical institutional approval (Institutional Review Board No 00012098, Federalwide Assurance No 00018699)., Setting: The study involved 60 women between 21 and 69 years old with breast cancer who were scheduled for modified radical mastectomy or conservative breast surgeries in a university hospital., Methods: After verbal and informed written consent, the patients were allocated to Group 1, which received SAPB, and Group 2, which received SAPB with PIFB. We assessed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), perioperative opioid requirements, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, rescue analgesia, and complications. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were surveyed using a questionnaire where one is very dissatisfied and 5 is very satisfied., Results: Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate were significantly lower in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB). The number of patients who needed intraoperative fentanyl was also significantly lower in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB) (P value = 0.010). Postoperative VAS showed no significant difference in both groups. The number of patients who needed postoperative rescue morphine, time for the first rescue analgesia, first morphine dose (mg), and total opioid consumption were also comparable for both groups. Patient satisfaction and surgeon satisfaction were comparable for both groups (P values = 1.000 and 0.496, respectively)., Limitations: VAS was not recorded during movements and no follow-up was done to detect the potential effect on chronic postmastectomy pain. Moreover, after reviewing the literature, there was no efficient data about adding PIFB with different regional blocks for breast surgery., Conclusions: The number of patients who needed intraoperative fentanyl, as well as the MABP and heart rate were significantly lower in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB). Postoperative vital signs, VAS, postoperative analgesic requirements, and opioid consumption were comparable for both groups. Patient satisfaction was comparable for both groups, while surgeon satisfaction was higher in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB) but statistically not significant.

Background and Aim: Cardiac surgery typically causes moderate to severe postoperative pain and discomfort. Inadequate pain management in the early postoperative period leads to pulmonary complications. The length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the hospital is typically prolonged. As a component of multimodal analgesia regimens, fascial plane blocks have become more popular. In our clinic, serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB), pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I-II), and pectointercostal nerve fascial plane blocks (PIFB) are performed by ultrasonography. We wished to evaluate the postoperative visual pain scale, initial additional analgesic agent requirement time, extubation time, morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent open heart surgery with fascial plane blocks., Materials and Methods: Forty-eight patients over 18 years who underwent open heart surgery with sternotomy between 01 September 2021 and 15 June 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients with chest wall blocks placed at the end of surgery were included in the study. In Group 1, the PECS II block was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery in the operating room. In Group 2, SAPB was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery. Data regarding patient demographics, anesthesia method applied, amount of opioid used intraoperatively, cardiopulmonary bypass time, anesthesia and surgery time, postoperative extubation time, mechanical ventilation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of patients at rest and movement at 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 48th hours post-extubation, time to and type of first postoperative analgesic, postoperative complications, length of cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) stay and hospital length of stay were recorded from hospital records., Results:  The data of a total of 46 patients (Group 1: PECS II block + PIFB, n=20; Group 2: SAPB+ PIFB, n=26) were analyzed retrospectively. There was no difference in demographic variables between the groups. Intraoperative opioid usage, operation time, Cardiopulmonary bypass time, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, extubation time, ICU discharge time, and length of hospital stay were not statistically different between the groups. The first rescue analgesic requirement time was longer in group 2 than in group 1 but not statistically significant (18.76±15.36 h vs 12.62±10.61 h, p=0.162). The post-extubation VAS scores at rest and movement at the 6th hour were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1.73±1.28 vs 3.15±2.10, respectively, p=0.02)., Conclusion: In our study, the VAS scores at the 6th hour were lower in SAPB + PIFB group than in PECS II + PIFB group. As these blocks can be easy to apply, we thought these combinations could be an alternative for pain relief in cardiac surgery. Prospective randomized studies are needed with a large number of patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Ata et al.)

This study tested the hypothesis that continuous bilateral erector spinae plane blocks placed preoperatively would reduce opioid consumption and improve outcomes compared with standard practice in open cardiac surgery patients. Patients who received bilateral continuous erector spinae plane blocks for primary open coronary bypass, aortic valve, or ascending aortic surgery were compared to a historical control group. Patients in the block group received a 0.5% ropivacaine bolus preoperatively followed by a 0.2% ropivacaine infusion begun postoperatively. No other changes were made to the perioperative care protocol. The primary outcome was opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were time to extubation and length of stay. Twenty-eight patients received continuous erector spinae plane blocks and fifty patients served as historic controls. Patients who received blocks consumed less opioids, expressed as oral morphine equivalents, both intraoperatively (34 ± 17 vs. 224 ± 125 mg) and during their hospitalization (224 ± 108 vs. 461 ± 185 mg). Patients who received blocks had shorter times to extubation (126 ± 87 vs. 257 ± 188 min) and lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (35 ± 17 vs. 58 ± 42 h) and hospital (5.6 ± 1.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.6 days). Continuous erector spinae plane blocks placed prior to open cardiac surgical procedures reduced opioid consumption, time to extubation, and length of stay compared to a standard perioperative pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]