Search

Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is an aneurismal type of macular neovascularization that show similarities with age‐related macular degeneration and diseases that are part of the pachychoroid disease spectrum. Exudative changes in PCV can be treated with intravitreal anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy; however, a combination therapy with photodynamic therapy may be required. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of faricimab for PCV. We searched 12 literature databases for eligible studies. All study evaluation and data extraction were made by two authors in duplicate. Studies eligible for analysis were included for a qualitative and quantitative review. We identified seven studies with data from 150 eyes with PCV, five studies were of treatment‐naïve eyes who were commenced in faricimab monotherapy, and two studies were of switch‐over to faricimab from other anti‐VEGF drugs. After faricimab loading dose in treatment‐naïve eyes, the best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable at −0.09 (95% CI: −0.20–0.03) logMAR, central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased −169 (95% CI: −311–−27) μm, and 48.7 (95% CI: 32.5–65.0) % of eyes obtained polyp closure. In switch‐over eyes, 57%–67% experienced fluid reduction and 21% were able to extend their treatment interval. In conclusion, faricimab monotherapy for PCV leads to acceptable clinical outcomes in terms of stable BCVA, reduction of CRT, and high incidence of polyp closure. Some cases may benefit from a switch to faricimab. However, long‐term efficacy studies and controlled comparative studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes of patients with "treatment‐resistant" neovascular age‐related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema who were switched to intravitreal faricimab injections (IFIs) using a "real‐world" treat‐and‐extend (TAE) protocol. Methods: Seventy‐one eyes from 62 patients receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor injections were evaluated before and after switching to IFI. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Primary endpoints were treatment interval extension and presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid on spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) after switching to IFI. Secondary endpoints included best‐corrected visual acuity, average OCT central subfield thickness, and presence of a pigment epithelium detachment and pigment epithelium detachment height. Results: The average treatment interval after switching to IFI significantly increased from 37.6 ± 10.8 days to 45.2 ± 16.6 days (p = 0.0016). At the last follow‐up, 35% of eyes were able to achieve a fluid‐free status post‐IFI. A chi‐square test of independence validated this finding by showing a significant difference in the OCT findings trending towards less or no fluid on follow‐up (X2 [3, N = 71] = 13.0705; p = 0.0003). The average central subfield thickness decreased from 327.2 ± 89.1 μm to 294.8 ± 86.5 μm (p = 0.0294). Best‐corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, pigment epithelium detachment presence, and height had no significant difference after switching to IFI. Conclusions: In "treatment‐resistant" patients receiving anti‐VEGF therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema, switching to IFI in a "real‐world" TAE protocol led to statistically significant improvements in treatment interval and retinal fluid on spectral domain OCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); however, vision gains and anatomical improvements are not sustained over longer periods of treatment, suggesting other relevant targets may be needed to optimize treatments. Additionally, frequent intravitreal injections can prove a burden for patients and caregivers. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has been explored as an additional therapeutic target, due to the involvement of Ang-2 in DME and nAMD pathogenesis. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that targeting both VEGF and Ang-2 may improve clinical outcomes in DME and nAMD compared with targeting VEGF alone by enhancing vascular stability, resulting in reduced macular leakage, prevention of neovascularization, and diminished inflammation. Faricimab, a novel bispecific antibody that targets VEGF-A and Ang-2, has been evaluated in clinical trials for DME (YOSEMITE/RHINE) and nAMD (TENAYA/LUCERNE). These trials evaluated faricimab against the anti-VEGFA/B and anti–placental growth factor fusion protein aflibercept, both administered by intravitreal injection. In addition to faricimab efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics, durability was evaluated during the trials using a treat-and-extend regimen. At 1 year, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains versus aflibercept across YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. In YOSEMITE/RHINE, faricimab improved anatomic parameters versus aflibercept. Reduction of central subfield thickness (CST), and absence of both DME and intraretinal fluid were greater in faricimab- versus aflibercept-treated eyes. In TENAYA/LUCERNE, CST reductions were greater for faricimab than aflibercept at the end of the head-to-head phase (0–12 weeks), and were comparable with aflibercept at year 1, but with less frequent dosing. CST and vision gains were maintained during year 2 of both YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. These findings suggest that dual Ang-2/VEGF-A pathway inhibition may result in greater disease control versus anti-VEGF alone, potentially addressing the unmet needs and reducing treatment burden, and improving real-world outcomes and compliance in retinal vascular diseases. Long-term extension studies (RHONE-X, AVONELLE-X) are ongoing. Current evidence suggests that dual inhibition with faricimab heralds the beginning of multitargeted treatment strategies inhibiting multiple, independent components of retinal pathology, with faricimab providing opportunities to reduce treatment burden and improve outcomes compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study assessed the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), previously treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab with unsatisfactory results. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with nAMD switched to intravitreally administered faricimab from traditional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments between September 2022 and April 2023 because of unsatisfactory response (maximal fluid-free interval ≤ 8 weeks). Faricimab was administered with a loading dose of four 4-weekly injections, followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. The primary outcome measures were maximum fluid-free interval after the switch and last assigned treatment interval. Secondary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural optical coherence tomography parameters. Results: Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients were included. Patients were followed for a median of 72 weeks [interquartile range 61, 76]. Median maximum fluid-free treatment interval after switch to faricimab and the last assigned interval were significantly longer than before the switch (7 vs. 4 weeks, p < 0.001 and 8 vs. 5 weeks, p < 0.001, respectively). Significant improvements in central subfield thickness (353 vs. 281 µm), macular volume (2.46 vs. 2.16 mm3), and pigment epithelial detachment height (198 vs. 150 µm) were observed (all p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable at 0.4 versus 0.3 logMAR before switch (p = 0.190). One eye (3%) developed intraocular inflammation and one eye (3%) developed a retinal pigment epithelium tear. Conclusions: Faricimab improved anatomical outcomes and allowed longer treatment intervals in patients with nAMD previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapies with unsatisfactory response, reducing treatment burden. A favorable safety profile was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T suggests that the response to treatment among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) may vary depending on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We evaluated the efficacy of faricimab 6 mg versus aflibercept 2 mg over 2 years in patients with DME and baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse enrolled in faricimab phase III trials. YOSEMITE and RHINE were identically designed, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator–controlled, noninferiority trials. Adults ≥18 years of age with center-involving macular edema secondary to type 1 or 2 diabetes. Patients were randomized to faricimab every 8 weeks (Q8W), faricimab personalized treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen, or aflibercept Q8W. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat population with baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse. Changes in ETDRS BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to years 1 and 2 were compared between treatment arms using mixed-model repeated measures analyses. In YOSEMITE and RHINE, respectively, 220 and 217 patients in the faricimab Q8W arm, 220 and 219 patients in the faricimab T&E arm, and 219 and 214 patients in the aflibercept Q8W arm showed baseline BCVA of 20/50 or worse. In both trials, mean change in ETDRS BCVA was comparable between treatments across trials at years 1 and 2. In YOSEMITE, adjusted mean change from baseline in CST (μm) at year 1 was greater with faricimab Q8W (–232.8; P < 0.0001) and faricimab T&E (–217.4; P = 0.0004)) versus aflibercept Q8W (–190.4). In RHINE, this was faricimab Q8W (–214.2; P = 0.0006) and faricimab T&E (–206.6; P = 0.0116) versus aflibercept Q8W (–186.6). In both trials, change from baseline in CST at year 2 was greater with faricimab Q8W versus aflibercept. The median time to first CST of <325 μm and first absence of intraretinal fluid was shorter in the faricimab arms versus the aflibercept arm, with fewer injections on average. In patients with DME and baseline ETDRS BCVA of 20/50 or worse, faricimab treatment resulted in comparable visual acuity, greater reduction in retinal thickness, and fewer injections compared with aflibercept. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Methods Results Conclusion To analyse the impact on cost if faricimab is used as the first‐line treatment for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (nAMD) compared to standard treatment with bevacizumab.Retrospective registry study including real‐world data from the Swedish Macula Registry between 2017 and 2022. The observed number of injections and visits for bevacizumab during the first two years of treatment was used (n = 437 patients). Number of faricimab injections was obtained from published clinical trial data and unit costs mostly from publicly available Swedish sources. The provider cost included medication and visit cost and societal cost included additionally patient travel cost. Costs are presented in 2023 EUR.The incremental societal cost of faricimab was 277 EUR per patient compared to bevacizumab in the base case. Medication cost was higher (1516 EUR) while visit cost (−1183 EUR) and patient travel cost (−56 EUR) were lower due to longer injection intervals. Faricimab was of similar cost as bevacizumab for patients residing far from the clinic. The faricimab injection interval and the number of bevacizumab injections were major drivers of uncertainty in the results.Faricimab represents a cost‐effective alternative to bevacizumab for patients with nAMD in Sweden. Its extended treatment interval is particularly beneficial for patients living far from clinics, and if the real‐life faricimab injection interval extends beyond 12 weeks. Our findings emphasize faricimab's potential to free up healthcare staff to treat a larger patient population with existing clinic resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in many retinal diseases. The comparative efficacy and safety of newer bispecific anti-VEGF/angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) agents in the treatment paradigm versus widely used monospecific anti-VEGF agents remains unclear. Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials published from 2015 to Jul 2024. With assessment by three independent reviewers, original English peer-reviewed full-text articles evaluating faricimab versus monospecific anti-VEGF agent(s) in FDA-indicated retinal disease with data on at least one set of efficacy and/or safety outcomes for each treatment arm and a minimum 3-month follow-up period were included. Data were appraised using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools, PRISMA, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. All outcomes were collected at the last follow-up. Random effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals were conducted to calculate weighted mean differences and risk ratios. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters), change in central subfield thickness (CSFT, μm), and presence of retinal fluid were primary endpoints; ocular adverse events were secondary endpoints. Results: Across 13 studies, in the context of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO), 2,226 eyes received anti-VEGF monotherapy and 3,022 received faricimab. Final and change in BCVA were similar between treatment groups. Faricimab was associated with a significantly higher reduction in CSFT in DME and RVO eyes but not in nAMD eyes. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusion: There was no difference in BCVA between faricimab and anti-VEGF monotherapy in nAMD, DME, and RVO. While faricimab offered superior improvement in CSFT at the final follow-up for DME and RVO eyes, this effect was not seen in nAMD eyes. Future studies are needed to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of faricimab for retinal vascular disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzes the dynamics of short-term treatment response to the first intravitreal faricimab injection in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). This retrospective, single-center, clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich. Patients with treatment-naïve and pretreated DME were included. Patient chart data and imaging were analyzed. Safety and efficacy (corrected visual acuity (CVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and signs of intraocular inflammation (IOI)) of the first faricimab intravitreal therapy (IVT) were evaluated weekly until 4 weeks after injection. Forty-three eyes (81% pretreated) of 31 patients were included. Four weeks after the first faricimab IVT, CVA remained stable and median CST (µm) decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 325.0 (293.5–399.0) at baseline to 304.0 (286.5–358.0). CVA at week 4 was only associated with baseline CVA (p < 0.001). CST was the only predictive variable (p = 0.002) between baseline and week 4 CST. Weekly safety assessments did not show any sign of clinically significant IOI. This study suggests faricimab is an effective treatment for (pretreated) DME, showing structural benefit 1 month following the first injection without short-term safety signals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Faricimab, a novel pharmaceutical agent targeting both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A pathways, has gained approval for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema. While clinical trials have demonstrated its favorable safety profile, this research presents two cases of hypertensive uveitis following intravitreal Faricimab injections. Methods: Medical history, clinical findings and multimodal images were retrospectively collected. Results: The patients experienced elevated intraocular pressure, mutton-fat keratic precipitates, anterior and posterior segment inflammation shortly after faricimab administration. Conclusions: These cases prompt further investigation into the potential risk of uveitis associated with faricimab and underscore the importance of continued monitoring and research to elucidate its real-world safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study investigates the early temporal changes in pigment epithelial detachment (PED) morphology following treatment with faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Utilizing an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted approach, we provide a detailed quantification and characterization of the dynamics of these morphological changes. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 22 eyes from 22 treatment-naïve patients with nAMD-associated PED (presenting either type 1 or type 3 macular neovascularization). Participants were administered intravitreal faricimab (6 mg) at baseline and at days 30, 60, and 90. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging were conducted at baseline and at seven additional follow-up visits on days 1, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120. An AI-based automated segmentation algorithm was utilized to precisely quantify changes in PED volume, alongside intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes, at each time point. Results: Treatment with faricimab resulted in a significant reduction in mean PED volume, with an average decrease of 12% at day 1, 29% at day 7, 51% at day 14, 68% at day 30, 72% at day 60, 79% at day 90, and 84% at day 120 (p < 0.0001 for all time points). Similarly rapid and marked reductions were noted in both mean IRF (23.5% at day 1, 90.7% at day 14) and SRF (14.4% at day 1, 91.2% at day 14) volumes. The study also showed a statistically significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over the follow-up period, correlating with the reduction in PED volume. Conclusion: Faricimab demonstrates early and significant efficacy in improving PED architecture in patients with nAMD. The rapid morphological improvements observed in this study suggest faricimab may represent a valid therapeutic option for PEDs associated with nAMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We describe a case of occlusive vasculitis associated with intravitreal Faricimab (Vabysmo) injections. Methods: A retrospective case report. Results: A 52-year old man treated with monthly Faricimab injections for diabetic macula oedema presented with sudden reduced vision, new retinal hemorrhages, significant retinal vascular occlusions and ischemia. After screening for differential diagnoses was unremarkable, the patient was treated with oral and intravitreal steroid therapy under which the occlusive vasculitis was stabilized. Conclusion: Occlusive vasculitis, though rare, is a potential complication of Faricimab therapy. Comprehensive reporting and large-scale analyses are essential to better understand and manage this adverse event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intravitreal faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting both angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), was recently introduced for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema and cystoid macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of intravitreal faricimab in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Methods: Single-centre, prospective cohort study of 21 eyes from 19 treatment-naïve nAMD patients who were treated with intravitreal faricimab from October 2022 to April 2024. Patients underwent a loading dose (LD) of 4 monthly faricimab injections followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural parameters from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of eyes achieving a dry macula, maximal fluid-free interval and intended interval at last follow-up. Results: The study included 21 eyes of 19 patients (mean age 83.1 years). After LD, 93.3% of eyes achieved a dry macular SD-OCT scan within a median time of 8 weeks. At the first extension, 53% of eyes remained dry, while 47% showed fluid recurrence. Long-term analysis (n = 14) revealed significant reductions in macular volume (MV), central subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height over a median follow-up of 64.9 weeks, with sustained visual and anatomical improvements. Median BCVA, CST, and MV at the final follow-up were significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.01). The intended interval between injections was ≥ 12 weeks in 42.86% of eyes. No cases of intraocular inflammation were observed, although 10% experienced retinal pigment epithelial tears. Conclusions: Intravitreal faricimab demonstrated favourable efficacy, safety, and durability outcomes in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve nAMD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate functional and anatomical changes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with a loading dose of faricimab intravitreal injections (IVIs). Methods: Eighteen eyes of 18 patients with active macular neovascularization and nAMD were enrolled at the Ophthalmology Clinic of University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy. All patients were scheduled for faricimab IVI as per label. Enrolled patients underwent complete ophthalmic evaluation, including optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography. All measurements were evaluated at baseline (T0) and then monthly up to week 20 (T4). Main outcome measures were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) presence and maximum height (PED-MH), intraretinal fluid (IRF) presence, subfoveal subretinal fluid (SSRF) presence and thickness. Results: BCVA improved and CMT reduced significantly during follow-up (p < 0.001). In addition, SFCT decreased significantly (p = 0.031). Between T0 and T4, SSRF presence reduced from 55.6 to 16.7% (p = 0.045); IRF presence changed from 50 to 22.2%, respectively (p = 0.074). PED-MH was reduced in 58.8% of patients at T4. At week 20, 72.3% of patients were in the q12/q16 interval. Conclusion: Faricimab showed efficacy in the treatment of naïve nAMD patients with an improvement of anatomical and functional parameters and a treatment interval after the loading phase equal or greater than 12 weeks in the majority of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and outcomes of switching neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients from aflibercept to faricimab, focusing on visual acuity, retinal fluid management, and treatment intervals. The primary aim was to assess the early outcomes in nAMD patients refractory to aflibercept and explore faricimab's potential as a longer-lasting therapeutic alternative. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 50 refractory nAMD patients at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi from September 2022–May 2023. Patients were switched from aflibercept to faricimab, having met specific criteria for refractory nAMD. The study analyzed best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and fluid changes post-switch, using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Results: After three faricimab injections, significant reductions in CST were observed, with a notable decrease in retinal fluid. The mean BCVA remained stable throughout the study period. Although there was a decrease in the maximum pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height, it was not statistically significant. Treatment intervals post-switch showed that the majority of patients maintained or extended their treatment intervals, with a significant proportion achieving resolution of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF). Conclusions: Switching to faricimab from aflibercept in refractory nAMD patients led to significant improvements in retinal fluid management and CST, with stable BCVA outcomes. Faricimab presents a promising alternative for patients requiring frequent aflibercept injections, potentially offering a more manageable treatment regimen with extended dosing intervals. This study highlights the need for personalized therapeutic strategies in nAMD treatment, though further research is necessary to optimize treatment switches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to compare the regressive effects of aflibercept and faricimab on pigment epithelial detachment (PED) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: In total, 41 eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with type 1 macular neovascularization were retrospectively analyzed using multimodal imaging. Of these, 23 eyes were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IVA group), and 18 eyes were treated with intravitreal faricimab (IVFa group), with 3 consecutive injections administered as loading dose therapy. Before treatment and at 1, 2, and 3 months after the first treatment, the maximum height (MH) and maximum diameter (MD) of the PED were measured using optical coherence tomography in each treatment group. Results: In the IVA group, the MH at baseline (215 ± 177 μm) was reduced to 141 ± 150 (P = 0.06), 119 ± 150 (P < 0.01), and 107 ± 150 µm (P < 0.0001) at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, respectively. Similarly, in the IVFa group, the MH decreased from 240 ± 195 µm before treatment to 165 ± 170 µm (P = 0.24), 139 ± 142 µm (P < 0.05), and 117 ± 112 µm (P < 0.01) at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, respectively. The reduction at 2 and 3 months was significant in both treatments. The mean changes of MH from baseline were -108 ± 142 µm in the IVA group and -124 ± 112 µm in the IVFa group, with no significant difference (P = 0.21). In both groups, the MD did not regress significantly. Conclusions: The results suggested that the MH of the PED between the IVA and IVFa groups regressed similarly after each loading therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a prevalent exudative maculopathy, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first-line choice for treatment. Faricimab, a novel anti-VEGF and anti-angiopoietin-2 bispecific agent, has recently been approved for the treatment of DME. In this study, we systematically reviewed the real-world evidence of the efficacy of faricimab for the treatment of DME. Methods: We searched 11 databases for eligible studies. Study selection and data extraction were made independently by two authors in duplicate. Eligible studies were reviewed qualitatively. Results: We identified 10 eligible studies that summarized data from a total of 6054 eyes with a mean follow-up of between 55 days and 12 months. Five studies reported outcomes in a population of both treatment-naïve and previously treated eyes, and five studies reported outcomes exclusively in relation to eyes that were previously treated. Faricimab improved the best-corrected visual acuity and macular thickness. The extension of the treatment interval was possible in 61–81% of treatment-naïve eyes and 36–78% of previously treated eyes. Conclusions: Faricimab for DME yields clinical outcomes similar to those known from previous anti-VEGF treatments but with extended treatment intervals, thus lowering the burden of therapy for patients. Long-term real-world studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup. Study design: YOSEMITE/RHINE (NCT03622580/NCT03622593) subgroup analysis: global, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-comparator–controlled, phase 3 faricimab trials. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to intravitreal faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) and per treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing, or aflibercept 2.0 mg Q8W. Outcomes were assessed through year 2 for the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup (N = 60) and the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE global cohort (N = 1891). Results: In the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup, 21, 19, and 20 patients were randomized to faricimab Q8W, faricimab T&E, and aflibercept Q8W, respectively (632, 632, and 627 patients in the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort). Vision gains and anatomic improvements with faricimab at year 1 were maintained over 2 years and were generally consistent between groups. Mean best-corrected visual acuity changes from baseline at year 2 (weeks 92–100 average) for the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup were +12.5, +9.0, and +5.0 letters in the faricimab Q8W, faricimab T&E and aflibercept Q8W arms, respectively (+10.8, +10.4, and +10.3 letters in the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort). At week 96, 61.1% of the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup and 78.1% of the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort were on ≥ Q12W dosing. Faricimab was well-tolerated with a safety profile comparable with aflibercept. Conclusion: Faricimab up to Q16W offered durable vision gains and anatomic improvements up to 2 years in patients with DME in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup. Outcomes were generally consistent with the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the short-term outcomes of intravitreal faricimab (IVF) for previously treated refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective monocentric study including 44 eyes treated with an upload of 4 × monthly intravitreal injections (IVI) of faricimab 6 mg/0.05 mL and followed for 4 weeks after last IVI (16 W). Patients were switched to IVF after treatment with at least three other anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF). Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and retinal fluid distribution. Results: 44 eyes of 44 patients with previously treated refractory nAMD (63% males) were included. Mean age was 79 ± 7 years. The total number of previous anti-VEGF before switching to IVF was 32 ± 15 IVIs/eye. BCVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.65 ± 0.26 to 0.50 ± 0.23 at 16 W (p <0.01). CMT (µm) decreased significantly from 422 ± 68 to 362 ± 47 at 16 W (p < 0.01). SFCT did not change significantly at 16 W (p = 0.06). The number of eyes with subretinal fluid (SRF) decreased significantly from 29 (65%) to 13 (29%) at 16 W (p =0.001). There were no significant changes regarding the distribution of intraretinal fluid or pigment epithelial detachment (p > 0.05). A complete fluid resolution was achieved in 8 eyes (18%). No adverse events were noticed. Conclusion: In the short term, IVF led to a significant decrease in CMT as well as a significant improvement of BCVA and thus appears to be an effective treatment option for previously treated refractory nAMD without relevant adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Yaqoob Qaseem,1 Kirk Kohwa Hou,1,2 Moritz S Pettenkofer1 1Retina Division, Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Moritz S Pettenkofer, Retina Division, Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, 200 Stein Plaza Driveway, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA, Email mpettenkofer@mednet.ucla.eduPurpose: To examine response to faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD) refractory to traditional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.Patients and methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted on eyes with nARMD with persistent subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid despite previously receiving ≥ 15 injections with ≥ 2 different anti-VEGF agents. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters were collected at baseline, initial post-injection visit, and most recent visit with OCT following last faricimab.Results: Nineteen eyes were included. Average logMAR BCVA was 0.47 ± 0.60 at baseline, 0.42 ± 0.47 at initial follow-up (p=0.38), and 0.51 ± 0.63 at final visit (p = 0.50). Average central subfield thickness (CST) was 310 ± 92 μm at baseline, 279 ± 88 μm at initial follow-up (p = 0.001), and 274 ± 100 μm at last visit (p < 0.001). 9 eyes (47%) achieved resolution of fluid at both initial and final follow-up visits.Conclusion: Faricimab mildly decreased CST and reduced fluid in some nARMD eyes refractory to traditional anti-VEGF agents but had minimal effect on BCVA.Keywords: anti-VEGF, choroidal neovascularization, faricimab, neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Danielle Modeste,1 Christopher Stewart,2 Hajani Premanandhan,2 Mahmoud Husseiny Awad,1 Gwyn Samuel Williams1 1Ophthalmology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, Wales, UK; 2Swansea Bay University, Medical School, Swansea, Wales, UKCorrespondence: Danielle Modeste, Ophthalmology Department, Singleton Hospital Sketty Ln, Sketty, Swansea, UK, SA2 8QA, Email danielle.modeste@wales.nhs.ukPurpose: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of Faricimab on treatment-naive neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real world UK clinic.Patients and Methods: This single centre, retrospective note review was conducted on treatment-naive patients with nAMD. The data collected included demographics, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), total retinal fluid (TRF), the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF).Results: A total of 66 eyes from 62 patients were analysed. The average age was 77 years (range 36– 91) and 54% of patients were female. After the first dose of faricimab, the average BCVA improved by 0.05 LogMAR (+2.5 letters), the average CMT decreased by 65.9μm and 41% of patients were found to be inactive. The follow-up intervals after the third loading dose were divided into 2 subsets of 4 and 8 week extensions. The 4 week extension subset saw a smaller improvement in BCVA (+3 letters) than the 8 week extension (+6 letters) while both had an average decrease in CMT by 86.6 μm. The total retinal fluid decreased by 45% and 70.7%, leaving only 30% and 12.2% residual intraretinal fluid (IRF) and 30% and 24.4% residual subretinal fluid (SRF), respectively. Over a ten-month period, the average number of injections received was 6.6, including 3 initial loading doses. There was only one reported case of an adverse event out of 66 eyes (1/66, 1.5%).Conclusion: Three loading doses of Faricimab appear efficacious and safe for the treatment of nAMD.Plain language Summary: What is already known on this topic:Faricimab is recombinant humanised bispecific IgG monoclonal antibody which binds and neutralises both VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (VEGFA and ANG2).Clinical trials have reported faricimab dosing intervals of up to Q16W.What this study adds:To offer a glimpse into real-world effectiveness and safety of faricimab beyond the constraints of a randomised controlled study in treatment naïve nAMD patients.Presents results derived from implementing a “Treat and Extend” algorithm with faricimab in nAMD management, showcasing its beneficial impact on the strategic planning and execution of patient care.How this research may affect research, practice or policy:Faricimab should be seen as a viable therapy in treatment-naive patients with nAMD.Employing a shortened loading regimen of three doses presents no discernible detriment to treatment efficacy when compared to the established four-dose schedule.Keywords: treatment-naïve, nAMD, Faricimab, dosing interval

Abstract Introduction This study assessed the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), previously treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab with unsatisfactory results. Methods This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with nAMD switched to intravitreally administered faricimab from traditional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments between September 2022 and April 2023 because of unsatisfactory response (maximal fluid-free interval ≤ 8 weeks). Faricimab was administered with a loading dose of four 4-weekly injections, followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. The primary outcome measures were maximum fluid-free interval after the switch and last assigned treatment interval. Secondary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural optical coherence tomography parameters. Results Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients were included. Patients were followed for a median of 72 weeks [interquartile range 61, 76]. Median maximum fluid-free treatment interval after switch to faricimab and the last assigned interval were significantly longer than before the switch (7 vs. 4 weeks, p

Abstract Background Intravitreal faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting both angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), was recently introduced for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema and cystoid macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of intravitreal faricimab in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Methods Single-centre, prospective cohort study of 21 eyes from 19 treatment-naïve nAMD patients who were treated with intravitreal faricimab from October 2022 to April 2024. Patients underwent a loading dose (LD) of 4 monthly faricimab injections followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural parameters from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of eyes achieving a dry macula, maximal fluid-free interval and intended interval at last follow-up. Results The study included 21 eyes of 19 patients (mean age 83.1 years). After LD, 93.3% of eyes achieved a dry macular SD-OCT scan within a median time of 8 weeks. At the first extension, 53% of eyes remained dry, while 47% showed fluid recurrence. Long-term analysis (n = 14) revealed significant reductions in macular volume (MV), central subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height over a median follow-up of 64.9 weeks, with sustained visual and anatomical improvements. Median BCVA, CST, and MV at the final follow-up were significantly improved from baseline (p

Abstract Purpose We describe a case of occlusive vasculitis associated with intravitreal Faricimab (Vabysmo) injections. Methods A retrospective case report. Results A 52-year old man treated with monthly Faricimab injections for diabetic macula oedema presented with sudden reduced vision, new retinal hemorrhages, significant retinal vascular occlusions and ischemia. After screening for differential diagnoses was unremarkable, the patient was treated with oral and intravitreal steroid therapy under which the occlusive vasculitis was stabilized. Conclusion Occlusive vasculitis, though rare, is a potential complication of Faricimab therapy. Comprehensive reporting and large-scale analyses are essential to better understand and manage this adverse event.

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the regressive effects of aflibercept and faricimab on pigment epithelial detachment (PED) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods In total, 41 eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with type 1 macular neovascularization were retrospectively analyzed using multimodal imaging. Of these, 23 eyes were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IVA group), and 18 eyes were treated with intravitreal faricimab (IVFa group), with 3 consecutive injections administered as loading dose therapy. Before treatment and at 1, 2, and 3 months after the first treatment, the maximum height (MH) and maximum diameter (MD) of the PED were measured using optical coherence tomography in each treatment group. Results In the IVA group, the MH at baseline (215 ± 177 μm) was reduced to 141 ± 150 (P = 0.06), 119 ± 150 (P

Abstract Introduction This study investigates the early temporal changes in pigment epithelial detachment (PED) morphology following treatment with faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Utilizing an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted approach, we provide a detailed quantification and characterization of the dynamics of these morphological changes. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on 22 eyes from 22 treatment-naïve patients with nAMD-associated PED (presenting either type 1 or type 3 macular neovascularization). Participants were administered intravitreal faricimab (6 mg) at baseline and at days 30, 60, and 90. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging were conducted at baseline and at seven additional follow-up visits on days 1, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120. An AI-based automated segmentation algorithm was utilized to precisely quantify changes in PED volume, alongside intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes, at each time point. Results Treatment with faricimab resulted in a significant reduction in mean PED volume, with an average decrease of 12% at day 1, 29% at day 7, 51% at day 14, 68% at day 30, 72% at day 60, 79% at day 90, and 84% at day 120 (p

Abstract Background To systematically review the real-world outcomes of intravitreal faricimab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) to evaluate its efficacy and safety in clinical settings. This study was conducted due to the need for real-world evidence to complement the findings from controlled clinical phase-III trials. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted on March 17, 2024, across 11 databases, utilizing search terms specifically tailored each database. All studies were reviewed qualitatively with specific focus on the outcomes of interest: the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the central retina thickness (CRT), and the burden of therapy. Results We identified a total of 22 eligible studies of 1762 eyes from 1618 patients with nAMD. Studies reported that intravitreal faricimab injections maintained BCVA in patients with previously treated eyes and demonstrated statistically significant improvement in patients with treatment-naïve eyes. The CRT was reduced after intravitreal faricimab therapy. Faricimab was well-tolerated, with no significant safety concerns identified, and reduced the overall burden of therapy. Conclusion Real-world studies corroborate the conclusions drawn from phase-III trials regarding faricimab treatment, demonstrating improvement in both visual and anatomical outcomes. Additionally, no significant safety issues were identified, as the treatment was generally well-tolerated and reduced the overall burden of therapy in the real-world settings.

Abstract Introduction The aims of this work were to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of a loading dose of intravitreal faricimab in eyes with active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) and to analyze the treatment outcome in relation to specific biomarkers. Methods Patients with active n-AMD or DME, treated with four monthly intravitreal injections of faricimab, were enrolled in this retrospective, uncontrolled study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), presence of retinal fluid (RF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), and adverse events were assessed at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Predefined biomarkers were evaluated at baseline (BL) and at last visit. Results Sixteen eyes of 15 patients with n-AMD (n-AMD group) and 15 eyes of 12 patients with DME (DME group) were included. Mean (± standard deviation) logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BL BCVA changed from 0.68 (± 0.43) to 0.53 (± 0.36; P = 0.13) and from 0.51 (± 0.34) to 0.32 (± 0.24; P: 0.048) at week 16 in n-AMD and DME group, respectively. A statistically significant mean CST reduction was reported in both groups at last visit (n-AMD: − 166.5 μm; P = 0.0009/DME: − 110.8 μm; P = 0.0086). Seventy-five and 33% of eyes with n-AMD and DME respectively achieved complete RF resolution at last visit. Subfoveal inner and outer retinal damage correlated with a lower final BCVA in n-AMD group. The presence of large (> 100 μm) juxtafoveal microaneurysms (MAs) was significantly correlated with a higher chance of residual fluid in eyes with DME. Conclusions Both n-AMD and DME groups achieved satisfactory anatomical results after a loading-dose of intravitreal faricimab. BCVA improvement might be hampered by pre-existing retinal damage in eyes with n-AMD. Large, juxtafoveal MAs might represent a hallmark of a slower anatomical response to the treatment in eyes with DME.

Abstract This is a summary of the original article ‟Cost‑Effectiveness of Faricimab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO): A UK Analysis”. DMO, a serious eye condition that can lead to vision loss in people with diabetes, is a significant health concern and a lack of knowledge exists about the cost-effectiveness (the balance of a treatment’s cost and its effectiveness) of new treatments. This research assessed the cost-effectiveness of a new medication named faricimab, using a mathematical model that simulated the progression of DMO and its treatment over 25 years. The model compared faricimab against relevant therapeutic alternatives for DMO in the UK, including ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab. The research discovered that faricimab could offer improved vision results and be cost saving or cost-effective. It also suggested that faricimab could lessen the strain on healthcare services due to its less frequent dosing schedule. Overall, such findings suggest that faricimab is a promising new treatment option for DMO that could benefit patients and the healthcare system. This could have implications for future treatment guidelines and the management of DMO in clinical practice.

Introduction: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment stands as the primary approach for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Faricimab has recently emerged as a novel anti-VEGF option for nAMD. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of faricimab in patients with refractory nAMD. Method: This retrospective study focused on refractory nAMD patients treated with faricimab at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from March 2023 to December 2023. Primary outcomes assessed the change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) over the first 4 months. Secondary outcomes included the presence of subretinal and intraretinal fluid (SRF and IRF) and changes in pigment epithelial detachment (PED). Subgroup analysis for the successful and unsuccessful treatment groups was conducted to identify potential confounding factors influencing treatment response. Result: This study included 42 eyes with refractory nAMD treated with faricimab. During a 6-month follow-up, no significant improvement in BCVA was observed, while CRT significantly decreased at all time points, except during the 5-month follow-up. Height PED showed significant reduction up to 5 months. The prevalence of SRF decreased significantly, while IRF remained lower but not significant. According to the treatment criteria, 67.4% successfully met the treatment goals. Subgroup analysis between successful and unsuccessful groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except a higher predominantly serous PED percentage in the successful group. Conclusion: Faricimab showed favorable outcomes in refractory nAMD patients. Further investigations are needed to understand the factors contributing to its efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]