Lamb, Jonathan Nicholas, Evans, Jonathan Thomas, Relton, Samuel, Whitehouse, Michael Richard, Wilkinson, J Mark, and Pandit, Hemant
Background: Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (POPFF) after total hip replacement (THR) requires complex surgery and is associated with a high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Although the United Kingdom based National Joint Registry (NJR) captures over 95% of THRs treated with revision, before June 2023 it did not capture POPFF treated with fixation. We aimed to estimate the incidence and epidemiology of POPFF treated with either surgery in England. Methods and findings: We performed a retrospective analysis of a mandatory, prospective database (NJR) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). All linkable primary THRs between 01/01/2004 and 31/12/2020 were included. Revision or fixation of POPFF were identified using a combination of procedural and diagnosis codes. We identified 809,832 THRs representing 5,542,332 prosthesis years at risk. A total of 5,100 POPFF were identified that had been surgically treated by revision, fixation, or both, and 2,831 of these fractures were treated with fixation alone, meaning 56% were not represented with revision data alone. The incidence of POPFF needing surgery was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90, 0.95) per 1,000 prostheses years. This incidence was higher in patients over the age of 70 at the time of primary THR (1.31 [95% CI 1.26, 1.35] per 1,000 prostheses years) and for patients who underwent THR for hip fracture (2.19 [95% CI 1.97, 2.42] per 1,000 prostheses years). This incidence appears to be increasing year on year. The cumulative probability of sustaining a POPFF within 10 years of THR was 1% and over 15% of patients died within 1 year of surgery for a POPFF. Conclusions: To date, the incidence of POPFF may have been underestimated with over 50% of cases missed if the case identification in this study is correct. After including these cases, we observed that POPFF is the largest reason for major reoperation following THR and patients sustaining these injuries have a high risk of death. The prevention and treatment of POPFF and requires further resource allocation and research. Jonathan Nicholas Lamb and colleagues perform a retrospective analysis of UK data sources to investigate the true incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture following total hip replacement. Author summary: Why was the study done?: When the thigh bone supporting a hip replacement breaks because of injury, it is called a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. Patients are usually treated with major surgery, which is associated with significant risk of complications, high cost, and even death. Currently the best estimates of how often these injuries occur after hip replacement in England are made using data which only counts when fractures are treated with one surgical method, revision and therefore miss a large proportion of cases. This study is the first large study combining hospital data and the best currently used source to get a much more complete picture of when these fractures occur. In addition to revision, the study was able to capture the other common treatment method, i.e., fixation, thereby providing a comprehensive and more meaningful review. What did the researchers do and find?: A very large data set of all hip replacements performed in England were matched to health data on hospital admissions to find patients who were treated with either exchange of implants (revision) and fixation of the fracture without exchange of implants. This study found that previous estimates of periprosthetic fractures only represented about half of the actual number treated in hospitals over the past 2 decades. When cases treated with revision and fixation are combined, periprosthetic fracture appears to be the most common cause of major re-operation after hip replacement. Patients who go on to sustain a fracture tended to be older and frailer at the time of the first hip replacement than those who do not go on to break. One in 25 patients with fractures died within 30 days of their operation, and the hospital length of stay was over 2 weeks. What do these findings mean?: These results suggest that periprosthetic fracture after hip replacement is the biggest problem facing patients with a hip replacement and the scale of the problem has previously been underestimated. Health care providers and researchers should prioritise the prevention and care for these vulnerable patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]