Search

BACKGROUND: Affecting >20million people in the U.S., including 4 % of all hospitalized patients, substance use disorder (SUD) represents a growing public health crisis. Evaluating a national cohort, we aimed to characterize the association of concurrent SUD with perioperative outcomes and resource utilization following elective abdominal operations. METHODS: All adult hospitalizations entailing elective colectomy, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, hepatectomy, and pancreatectomy were tabulated from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients with concurrent substance use disorder, comprising alcohol, opioid, marijuana, sedative, cocaine, inhalant, hallucinogen, or other psychoactive/stimulant use, were considered the SUD cohort (others: nSUD). Multivariable regression models were constructed to evaluate the independent association between SUD and key outcomes. RESULTS: Of ∼1,088,145 patients, 32,865 (3.0 %) comprised the SUD cohort. On average, SUD patients were younger, more commonly male, of lowest quartile income, and of Black race. SUD patients less frequently underwent colectomy, but more often pancreatectomy, relative to nSUD.Following risk adjustment and with nSUD as reference, SUD demonstrated similar likelihood of in-hospital mortality, but remained associated with increased odds of any perioperative complication (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.17, CI 1.09-1.25). Further, SUD was linked with incremental increases in adjusted length of stay (β + 0.90 days, CI +0.68-1.12) and costs (β + $3630, CI +2650-4610), as well as greater likelihood of non-home discharge (AOR 1.54, CI 1.40-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent substance use disorder was associated with increased complications, resource utilization, and non-home discharge following major elective abdominal operations. Novel interventions are warranted to address increased risk among this vulnerable population and address significant disparities in postoperative outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs. METHODS: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. RESULTS: Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic operation associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While respiratory and septic complications have been well-defined, the implications of acute kidney injury (AKI) remain unclear. Using a nationally representative database, we aimed to characterize the association of AKI with mortality, resource use, and 30-day readmission. METHODS: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer were identified in the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Study cohorts were stratified based on presence of AKI. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar survival analysis were used to evaluate the independent association between AKI and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of an estimated 40,438 patients, 3,210 (7.9%) developed AKI. Over the 10-year study period, the incidence of AKI increased from 6.4% to 9.7%. Prior radiation/chemotherapy and minimally invasive operations were associated with reduced odds of AKI, whereas public insurance coverage and concurrent infectious and respiratory complications had greater risk of AKI. After risk adjustment, AKI remained independently associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 3.62-5.83) and had significantly increased attributable costs ($112,000 vs $54,000) and length of stay (25.7 vs 13.3 days) compared to patients without AKI. Furthermore, AKI demonstrated significantly increased hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: AKI after esophagectomy is associated with greater risk of mortality, hospitalization costs, and 30-day readmission. Given the significant adverse consequences of AKI, careful perioperative management to mitigate this complication may improve quality of esophageal surgical care at the national level.

BACKGROUND: Expedited discharge following esophagectomy is controversial due to concerns for higher readmissions and financial burden. The present study aimed to evaluate the association of expedited discharge with hospitalization costs and unplanned readmissions following esophagectomy for malignant lesions. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective esophagectomy for cancer were identified in the 2014-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients discharged by postoperative day 7 were considered Expedited and others as Routine. Patients who did not survive to discharge or had major perioperative complications were excluded. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess association of expedited discharge with index hospitalization costs as well as 30- and 90-day non-elective readmissions. RESULTS: Of 9,886 patients who met study criteria, 34.6% comprised the Expedited cohort. After adjustment, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.71, p = 0.001) and increasing Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (AOR 0.88/point, p

Background: The progression of malnutrition and sarcopenia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer negatively influences long-term prognosis. To improve nutritional status after esophagectomy, we introduced an intensified nutrition management (iNM) protocol, in which nutritional counselling by dietitians was provided more frequently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iNM compared with the conventional NM (cNM). Methods: We included 126 patients who underwent esophagectomy before and after NM revision, and compared nutritional status and changes in body composition after esophagectomy between the cNM and iNM groups. Nutritional parameters were assessed, and we also calculated skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and visceral fat area (VFA) using computed tomography volumetry. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or surgical outcomes between the groups. Compared with the cNM group, nutritional counselling was provided more frequently (P < 0.001) in the iNM group, and compliance rate increased from 56.3 to 91.9% (P < 0.001). Body weight loss at 4 and 6 months and SMI reduction at 6 months were significantly improved in the iNM group compared with the cNM group (P < 0.001, P = 0.032, and P = 0.023, respectively). There were no significant differences in the changes in SMD, VFA, serum albumin level, and prealbumin level between the two groups. Conclusions: Outpatient iNM significantly mitigated the reduction in body weight and SMI 3–6 months after esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to determine the relationship between preoperative arterial calcifications and postoperative outcomes after Ivor Lewis esophagectomies. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective review of Ivor Lewis esophagectomies from 2013 to 2018. Preoperative CT imaging was reviewed, and arterial calcifications were graded (absent, minor, or major) in various locations. The primary outcome included major complications (defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification III–V) and the secondary outcomes were 90-day reoperations, readmissions, and mortality. Significant associations (p < 0.05) between calcifications and outcomes on univariable analysis were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratios, OR; 95% confidence intervals, CI). Results: One hundred patients underwent esophagectomies from 2013 to 2018 (79% male, 90% White, median age 68 years), and 85% were classified as ASA III. Ninety-four patients had accessible preoperative imaging. Arterial calcifications in specific areas were observed: 82 in coronary arteries (major in 33 patients), 54 in the aortic valve, 78 in supra-aortic arteries, 79 in the thoracic aorta, 82 in the abdominal aorta, and 71 in common iliac. Furthermore, 60 patients exhibited celiac axis calcifications, with 40 patients classified as major. Twenty-five patients experienced major complications. Anastomotic leak occurred in two patients, and graft necrosis occurred in one patient. Ninety-day readmission was 10%, reoperation was 12%, and mortality was 4%. On univariable analysis, major coronary artery calcifications were significantly associated with major complications (OR 4.04; 95% CI 1.34–12.16; p = 0.02) and 90-day readmissions (OR 8.20; 95% CI 1.01–68.47; p = 0.04). However, no significant associations were identified between 90-day reoperations or mortality and arterial calcifications. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that preoperative coronary calcifications increase the risk of postoperative complications, as this may be a surrogate of overall health. Nonetheless, the correlation between splanchnic calcifications and postoperative outcomes needs further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy occur frequently and impact on nutrition and quality of life. Although strictures are often attributed to ischemia and anastomotic leaks, the role of anastomosis size and pyloroplasty is not well evaluated. Our study aims to assess the rate of and risk factors for anastomotic stricture following esophagectomy, and the impact of treatment with regular endoscopic balloon dilatations. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 207) undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy performed by two surgeons at our institution were included. Data on patient demographics, surgical outcomes and anastomotic strictures were recorded. Relationship of anastomotic strictures with circular stapler size, pyloroplasty and anastomotic leak was analyzed. Treatment of strictures with endoscopic balloon dilatation was reviewed and percentage weight loss at 1 year was evaluated. Results: Anastomotic strictures occurred in 17.4% of patients. Patient demographics between those with and without stricture were similar. Stricture rate was similar in patients with or without pyloroplasty (13.9% vs 21.7%, respectively, p = 0.14) and in those with or without an anastomotic leak (25.0% vs 16.6%, respectively, p = 0.345). Stricture risk increased with smaller sized stapler (25 mm = 33.3%, 28 mm = 15.3%, 31 mm = 4.8%; p = 0.027). The median number of dilatations required to fully treat strictures was 2 (IQR: 1–3). The median length of time from surgery to first dilatation was 2.9 months (IQR: 2.0–4.7) and to last dilatation was 6.1 months (IQR: 4.8–10.0). Median maximum dilatation diameter was 20 mm (IQR: 18.0–20.0). There were no complications from dilatations. Percentage weight loss at 1 year in patients with strictures was similar to those without strictures (8.7% vs 11.1%, respectively, p = 0.090). Conclusions: Post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures are common and not necessarily related to anastomotic leaks or absence of pyloroplasty. Smaller anastomosis size was strongly linked with stricture formation. A driven approach with regular endoscopic balloon dilation is safe and effective in treating these strictures with no excess weight loss at 1 year once treated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Benign tumors of the esophagus are uncommon, and primary esophageal schwannoma of the esophagus is even rarer, accounting for 2% of cases. Less than 30 cases have been reported in the literature. Here we report a case of a young man with a symptomatic giant esophageal schwannoma, which was completely removed by laparoscopic three-staged esophagectomy. This is the first case of such a large lesion being removed by a minimally invasive approach. Our patient was a 22-year-old male, presented with dysphagia and dyspnea for five years. An endoscopy and CT scan suggested a giant leiomyoma. Postoperative biopsy revealed a primary esophageal schwannoma. We present our case of benign esophageal tumor measuring about 10.5 cm in greatest dimension. This is the first schwannoma resection performed with the Mckeown technique among the limited case reports in the literature. Esophageal schwannoma must be kept as a possible diagnosis in patients presenting with benign esophageal tumors. Esophagectomy is the mainstay of treatment for giant esophageal schwannomas. Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be safely performed for giant benign esophageal tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of surgery in oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This study evaluated the oncological outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with ESCC with distant lymph node (LN) metastasis. Patients with ESCC and nodal metastasis treated with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy between 2010 and 2020 were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between patients with distant LN metastasis (dLN+) and exclusively regional LN metastasis (dLN–). The cohort comprised 69 dLN+ and 111 dLN– patients. Survival was significantly better in the dLN– group than in the dLN+ group (5-year OS, 51.9% vs. 25.5%, P  < 0.001; RFS, 47.2% vs. 18.1%, P  < 0.001). Stratified by the yp stage, 49 (44.1%) dLN– and 30 (43.5%) dLN+ patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). In the dLN– and dLN+ groups, the OS rates were significantly higher in the pCR group than in the non-pCR group (dLN–: 76.7% vs. 32.4%, P  < 0.001; dLN+: 39.6% vs. 14.2%; P  = 0.002). The dLN–/pCR group had the best OS, significantly outperforming the dLN−/non-pCR and dLN+/pCR groups. OS did not differ between the dLN−/non-pCR and dLN+/pCR groups. The dLN+/non-pCR group had the worst OS. The RFS analysis paralleled the OS findings. Patients with dLN+ disease had worse outcomes than their dLN– counterparts, irrespective of the pCR status. The survival rates were poor but comparable between the dLN+/pCR and dLN−/non-pCR groups. Adjuvant therapy may be required for dLN+ patients following systemic treatment and surgery, even after achieving pCR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anastomotic leaks and stenoses remain critical complications in esophagectomy and are related to conduit perfusion. Surgical gastric preconditioning has been described but requires additional surgery and creates scar tissue, potentially hindering future operation. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous gastric preconditioning by angioembolization to improve perfusion of gastric conduits before esophagectomy in a high-risk patient cohort. Patients pending an esophagectomy for cancer and deemed to be high risk for anastomotic complications underwent preconditioning by image-guided angioembolization. Preconditioning was performed on an outpatient basis by means of superselective embolization of the left gastric and short gastric arteries. Intraoperative conduit perfusion evaluation with indocyanine green and postoperative surgical outcomes was reviewed. Seventeen patients underwent gastric preconditioning, with no complications observed. Thirteen of the 17 patients ultimately underwent esophagectomy; the remaining four patients were not candidates for an operation. Patients proceeded to surgery a median of 23 days (interquartile range, 21–27 days) after preconditioning. The intraoperative indocyanine green perfusion of all conduits was appropriate, with no tip demarcation and with a median time to dye uptake of 20s (interquartile range, 15–20s). There were no anastomotic stenoses or leaks noted within the series. Gastric conduit preconditioning by percutaneous angioembolization of the left gastric and short gastric arteries can be performed safely and without operative delay in high-risk patients. Further evaluation of preconditioning for conduit optimization is warranted to limit the critical complications of anastomotic leak and stenosis in esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Posterior thoracic para-aortic lymph node (TPAN) metastasis is a distant metastasis of esophageal cancer. Several case reports have shown that radical esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN improve the prognosis of patients with cStage IVB esophageal cancer and solitary posterior TPAN metastasis; however, the true value of this procedure is unclear. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN after induction chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. This study enrolled 15 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for cStage IVB esophageal cancer with solitary posterior TPAN metastasis after induction chemotherapy between January 2013 and October 2022 at our hospital. The short- and long-term of radical esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN were retrospectively evaluated. All patients who underwent radical esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN achieved a pR0 in this study. The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 385 minutes and 164 ml, respectively. Four patients (26.7%) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or more. The median postoperative hospital stay was 15 days. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 55.6% (95% confidence interval: 23.1–79.0) and 55.0% (95% confidence interval: 25.3–77.2), respectively. We showed that lymphadenectomy for posterior TPAN metastasis was associated with an improved prognosis of some patients with advanced esophageal cancer. This technique may serve as a viable treatment option for patients who respond well to induction chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standard treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy damages the surrounding tissue, which potentially increases the risk of postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage. The impact of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT, 50.4 Gy radiotherapy) compared to the standard neoadjuvant scheme (nCRT, 41.4 Gy radiotherapy) prior to surgery on the incidence of anastomotic leakage remains poorly understood. To study this, all patients who received dCRT between 2011 and 2021 followed by esophagectomy were included. For each patient, two patients who received nCRT were selected as matched controls. Outcomes included postoperative anastomotic leakage, pulmonary and other complications, anastomotic stenosis, pulmonary and other postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo Classification ≥1), and overall survival. One hundred and eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 28 months. The time between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery was longer in the dCRT group compared to the nCRT group (65 vs. 48 days, P  < 0.001). Postoperatively, significantly more patients in the dCRT group suffered from anastomotic leakage (11% vs. 1%, P  = 0.04) and anastomotic stenosis (42% vs. 17%, P  < 0.01). No differences were found for other complications or overall survival between both groups. In conclusion, preoperative dCRT is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage and stenosis. These complications, however, can be treated effectively. Therefore, esophagectomy after dCRT is considered to be an appropriate treatment strategy in a selected patient group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although esophageal cancers invading the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (pT1b-SM) after endoscopic resection (ER) are associated with a risk of lymph node metastasis, details of metastatic recurrence after additional treatment remain unknown. We aimed to identify the risk factors for metastatic recurrence and recurrence patterns in patients receiving additional treatment after ER for esophageal cancer. Between 2006 and 2017, patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer who underwent ER with additional treatment (esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy [CRT], and radiation therapy) at 21 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We evaluated the risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment. Subsequently, the rate and pattern (locoregional or distant) of metastatic recurrence were investigated for each additional treatment. Of the 220 patients who received additional treatment, 57, 125, and 38 underwent esophagectomy, CRT, and radiation therapy, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion was the sole risk factor for metastatic recurrence after additional treatment (hazard ratio, 3.50; P  = 0.029). Although the risk of metastatic recurrence with additional esophagectomy was similar to that with CRT (hazard ratio, 1.01; P  = 0.986), the rate of locoregional recurrence tended to be higher with additional esophagectomy (80.0% (4/5) vs. 36.4% (4/11)), leading to a better prognosis in patients with metastatic recurrence after additional esophagectomy than CRT (survival rate, 80.0% (4/5) vs. 9.1% (1/11)). Patients with lymphatic invasion have a high risk of metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment for pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer. Additional esophagectomy may result in a better prognosis after metastatic recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgical resection is the consistent component of curative treatment strategies for primary malignant diseases of the stomach and the esophagus. The placement of anastomoses for the necessary reconstruction still accounts for substantial morbidity and in the case of a failure to rescue also for mortality, especially for esophagojejunostomy and esophagogastrostomy. The diagnostics of anastomotic leakage routinely involve computed tomography and endoscopy and timely performance appears to be essential. Endoscopy can simultaneously initiate the essential treatment step. A major reason for the improvement of postoperative outcomes after resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract in the last decades is the successful and mostly endoscopically performed management of anastomotic leakage, whereby different endoscopic treatment options are now available. Endoscopic vacuum therapy has become established as the standard, normally with an endoscopic vacuum sponge technique but is also now supplemented by a combination system of vacuum sponge and stent. Furthermore, a foil-coated multiple lumen nasogastric tube represents another available option, which can possibly especially be used as a prophylactic measure. The longest established endoscopic therapy option for anastomotic leaks, the endoluminal metal stent, has been replaced as the standard by the vacuum treatment but is still used in suitable situations. Additionally, there are endoscopic suture devices that are currently only used very occasionally. Surgical revision is always available as treatment escalation but is only recommended for very early occurrences and possibly technically related anastomotic leakage and in the case of failure of endoscopic treatment. This article describes and summarizes the diagnostics and treatment of anastomotic leakages after surgical procedures of the upper gastrointestinal tract. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of the present study is to assess the effectiveness of indocyanine-green (ICG)-guided lymphography (ICG-Lg) in reducing the incidence of chyle leak (CL) after esophagectomy. Background: Chylothorax may severely impact esophageal cancer surgery, and the pre-emptive ligation of the thoracic duct (TD) is the most widespread control of this complication. Intraoperative ICG-Lg has been recently embedded in minimally invasive esophagectomy to facilitate TD detection and pre-emptive ligation. Methods: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer at a tertiary referral center between January 2018 and August 2023. Patients were routinely submitted to extended lymphadenectomy with TD ligation and removal. All patients treated after January 2021 underwent ICG-Lg for TD identification and ligation (ICG group) and compared with the previous series (no- ICG group). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative CL, while univariate and backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify associated factors. Results: After including 320 patients, 151 (ICG group) were submitted to ICG-Lg before the pre-emptive TD ligation. Both groups presented similar characteristics, except for neoadjuvant therapy (P< 0.001) and preoperative comorbidities (P=0.045). Intraoperative ICG-Lg significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative CL (11.8% vs 4.6%, P=0.026) and was significantly associated with shorter median length of hospital stay (13 vs 9 d, P=0.006). However, CL after ICG-Lg was more likely to require repairing reoperation (P= 0.050). Conclusions: Intraoperative ICG-Lg demonstrated significantly lower rates of CL after total minimally invasive esophagectomy and, therefore, it should be routinely embedded in the standardized surgical technique of high-volume centers for esophageal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the era of minimally invasive surgery, esophagectomy remains a highly invasive procedure with a high rate of postoperative complications. Preoperative risk assessment is essential for planning esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer, and it is crucial to implement evidence‐based perioperative management to mitigate these risks. Perioperative support from multidisciplinary teams has recently been reported to improve the perioperative nutritional status and long‐term survival of patients undergoing esophagectomy. Intraoperative management of anesthesia and fluid therapy also significantly affects short‐term outcomes after esophagectomy. In this narrative review, we outline the recent updates in the perioperative management of esophagectomy, focusing on preoperative risk assessment, intraoperative management, and perioperative support by multidisciplinary teams to improve operative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Dysphagia often develops after esophagectomy. The geniohyoid muscle is involved in swallowing movements, but its significance in esophagectomy patients remains unclear. We investigated the relationship of preoperative geniohyoid muscle mass with post‐esophagectomy swallowing function. Method s : We retrospectively analyzed 114 patients who underwent esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal malignancy. We evaluated preoperative geniohyoid muscle sagittal cross‐sectional areas (cm2) using computed tomography. Median values for each sex were considered as cutoff values. Dysphagia severity was assessed using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) during video‐fluoroscopic swallowing studies performed 7–10 days postoperatively. Results: The cross‐sectional area was significantly larger in males than in females (3.2 ± 0.7 vs. 2.4 ± 0.5, p < 0.01: median in males: 3.2 cm2, and in females: 2.3 cm2). These values were used to define high and low cross‐sectional area groups. The cross‐sectional area correlated positively with grip strength (correlation coefficient (CC) = 0.530) and skeletal muscle index (CC = 0.541). Transthyretin levels (22.4 ± 6.8 vs. 25.4 ± 5.5, p = 0.03) and cross‐sectional area (2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients with (PAS score ≥6; 20%) than in those without aspiration during fluoroscopic swallowing studies. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was significantly more frequent in those with than in those without aspiration during fluoroscopic studies (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, low cross‐sectional area and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were both independent risk factors for aspiration during swallowing studies (odds ratio = 3.6, p = 0.03 and odds ratio = 6.6, p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion: Preoperative geniohyoid muscle mass, evaluated using neck computed tomography, can predict dysphagia after esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite being a less-invasive procedure, esophagectomy can cause severe infectious complications, such as pneumonia and anastomotic leakage. Herein, we aimed to clarify the inflammatory characteristics of pneumonia/anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy by assessing the difference between the postoperative trends of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels in patients with pneumonia/anastomotic leakage using the values on the consecutive postoperative day (POD). Methods: This study included 439 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy. Serum CRP and PCT levels were measured on PODs 1–7, 10, and 14. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage were defined as Clavien–Dindo grades ≥ 2. Results: Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 96 and 51 patients, respectively. The CRP and PCT levels peaked on POD 3 (11.6 ± 6.8 mg/dL) and POD 2 (0.69 ± 2.9 ng/mL), respectively. Between PODs 3 and 14, CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with pneumonia and anastomotic leakage than in those without complications (P < 0.001). Between PODs 3 and 14, PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with pneumonia; however, on most PODs, there were no significant differences in PCT levels between patients with and without anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: Inflammatory reactions caused by pneumonia may be more intense than those caused by anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Postoperative trends in serum CRP and PCT levels may vary depending on the complication type. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy can be potentially distinguished by the postoperative trend of PCT values before detailed examinations, such as computed tomography and endoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The upper mediastinum is the most common metastatic site of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and complete dissection of this region is important for oncologic reasons. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes and completeness of upper mediastinal dissection for ESCC patients undergoing the Ivor-Lewis (IL) or McKeown (MK) operations. Methods: Between 2013 and 2018, 680 patients (IL, 433; MK, 247) underwent upfront esophagectomy with two-field lymph node (LN) dissection for mid-to-lower ESCCs. Propensity score-matching (1:1 ratio) was performed to minimize the effects of confounding factors. Results: The mean age was 64.5 ± 8.8 years, and 635 (93.4%) of the patients were male. The median follow-up period was 71.66 months (interquartile range [IQR], 59.60–91.04 months). The IL group had a higher mean age, lower body mass index, higher proportion of advanced T and N, and higher adjuvant therapy rates, but these differences were well-balanced after propensity score-matching. The mean number of dissected LNs at the mediastinum and at the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) were similar between the two groups after matching, whereas the IL group exhibited a slightly greater number of dissected LNs at the left RLN. Among the matched patients, the IL and MK groups exhibited similar 5-year overall survival (OS: 75.1% vs 78.0%; p = 0.368). The multivariate model showed no differences in OS, disease-free survival, or recurrence-free survival for locoregional, upper mediastinum, or neck between the two groups. Conclusions: This study suggests that both the IL and MK operations are oncologically feasible for patients with mid-to-lower ESCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the method of choice for the resection of esophageal cancer worldwide. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a tertiary care center with a detailed description of the course of the program. Results: A total of 136 transthoracic esophageal resections were performed between 2010 and 2023. The study group included 116 operations, 69 of which were fully minimally invasive and 47 hybrid. 80.0% of the study group underwent surgery using a multimodality approach. The median operation time was 431 min (± 103). The R0 resection rate was 100%. Forty-two patients (36.2%) had no postoperative complications. The postoperative Clavien-Dindo > IIIb morbidity was 27%. The postoperative 90-d mortality rate was 1.7%. The average number of lymph nodes removed in the last quarter of cancer patients was 31. The anastomotic insufficiency rate for reoperation was 4% (Ivor-Lewis 4.2%, McKeown 5%). Conclusions: With extensive expertise in high-end minimally invasive abdominal and thoracic surgery, implementation of a minimally invasive esophageal resection program with a clinical and oncologic outcome within generally accepted limits is feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Esophageal surgery is associated with a high hospital mortality. Research shows that hospitals performing more esophageal surgeries have better outcomes due to a higher likelihood of rescuing patients from complications. Since 2004, Germany has mandated a minimum required caseload per year for hospitals to ensure quality care and, as of 2023, increased the annually required number of complex esophageal operations from 10 to 26. This review will explore how the caseload per year impacts the quality of patient care and surgical training, especially regarding robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), which promises greater precision and better outcomes for esophageal cancer surgeries. Esophageal surgery is deemed one of the most complex visceral operations. There is a well-documented correlation between higher caseload and better outcomes, with hospitals that perform more surgeries experiencing significantly lower mortality rates. The approach to caseload per year varies across different countries within Europe. Germany increased the minimum annual required caseload of complex esophageal surgeries from 10 to 26 starting in 2023. Furthermore, the new regulations present challenges for surgical training and staff recruitment, risking the further fragmentation of training programs. Enhanced regional cooperation is proposed as a solution to ensure comprehensive training. This review explores the benefits of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in improving surgical precision and patient outcomes and aims to evaluate how the caseload per year influences the quality of patient care and the efficacy of surgical training, especially with the integration of advanced robotic techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is a common complication of esophageal surgery. The current study compares three endoscopic procedures—Intra-Pyloric Injection of Botulinum Toxin (IPBT), Pneumatic Balloon Dilation (PBD), and a combination of both in the same session (BTPD)—to determine which approach is the most effective in DGCE treatment. By analyzing data from 64 patients endoscopically treated, results showed that the combination approach (BTPD) was associated with a higher rate of symptom resolution. BTPD allowed patients to resume eating and be discharged more quickly. These findings suggest that BTPD may be the most effective treatment for DGCE, offering better patient outcomes and potentially guiding future treatment strategies. Background/Objectives: Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) occurs in 15–39% of patients who undergo esophagectomy. Intra-Pyloric Injection of Botulinum Toxin (IPBT), Pneumatic Balloon Dilation (PBD), and the same session combination (BTPD) represent the main endoscopic procedures, but comparative data are currently unavailable. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on all consecutive patients with DGCE treated endoscopically with IPBT, PBD, or BTPD. ISDE Diagnostic Criteria were used for DGCE diagnosis and classification. A Gastric Outlet Obstruction Score was used for clinical staging. All patients undergoing IPBT received 100 UI of toxin, while those undergoing PBD were dilated up to 20 mm. Clinical success (CS) was defined as the resolution of symptoms/resumption of feeding at discharge or expanding dietary intake at any rate. Recurrence was defined as symptom relapse after more than 15 days of well-being requiring endoscopic/surgical intervention. Results: A total of 64 patients (81.2% male, 90.6% Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, 77.4% adenocarcinoma) with a median age of 62 years (IQR 55–70) were enrolled: 18 (28.1%) in the IPBT group, 24 (37.5%) in the PBD group, and 22 (34.4%) in the BTPD group. No statistically significant differences were found in the baseline characteristics, surgical techniques, and median follow-up among the three groups. BTPD showed a higher CS rate (100%) compared to the PD and BTPD groups (p = 0.02), and a Kaplan–Meier analysis with a log–rank test revealed that the BTPD group was associated both with a significatively shorter mean time to refeed of 1.16 days (95% CI 0.8–1.5; p = 0.001) and a shorter median time to discharge of one day (95% CI 1–3; p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Endoscopic management of DGCE remains challenging. Waiting for further strong evidence, BTPD can offer patients a higher clinical efficacy rate and a shorter time to refeed and be discharged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tongue pressure (TP) decreases significantly after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients (ECPs). Meanwhile, 2 weeks of gum-chewing training (GCT) significantly increased TP in healthy university students. We examined whether perioperative GCT would decrease the proportion of patients exhibiting a decline in TP at 2 weeks postoperatively, and prevent postoperative complications, in thoracic ECPs (TECPs). This was a single-center interventional study, and nonrandomized study with a historical control group (HCG). TECPs who underwent first-stage radical esophagectomy were recruited. Thirty-two patients of 40 in the gum-chewing group (GCG) were completed perioperative GCT in 3 times daily. Propensity score matching was performed with covariates related to TP including preoperative age, sex, body mass index, and the repetitive saliva swallowing test result, and yielded a matched cohort of 25 case pairs. Eleven GCG patients [44.0%] exhibited significantly lower TP at 2 weeks postoperatively than before esophagectomy was significantly fewer than that of 19 patients [76.0%] in the HCG. The median number of fever days (> 38 °C) in the 2 weeks after esophagectomy in the GCG was significantly fewer than those in the HCG. Perioperative GCT may prevent postoperative TP decline and postoperative dysphagia-related complications after esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastric conduit obstruction (GCO) is a known complication after esophagectomy. Laparoscopic revision surgery for GCO is relatively rare, with limited reports in the literature. Here, we report a case of GCO after robot-assisted subtotal esophagectomy and posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction, which was successfully repaired laparoscopically. Case presentation: A 66-year-old man presented with a passage disorder that became noticeable 14 months after surgery. Fluid passage was difficult, and the patient opted for revision surgery. The conduit had entered and deflected into the mediastinum; it also twisted due to band formation. The revision surgery was performed laparoscopically through five ports. The bands were dissected, esophageal hiatus was sutured, and conduit re-fixed. The intraoperative endoscopy was used to confirm that the obstruction had been released. The lack of adhesion of the posterior half of the gastric conduit wall, combined with postoperative weight loss leading to a decrease in omental volume, as well as inadequate fixation during the initial surgery, are believed to have contributed to the ease of the conduit deviation into the intrathoracic cavity. In addition, the twisting of the conduit due to band formation exacerbated the obstruction. Conclusions: Laparoscopic revision surgery may become an effective treatment option as the number of minimally invasive esophagectomies is expected to increase in the future. Furthermore, the fixation method during initial surgery should be carefully considered and optimized to prevent gastric conduit obstruction. Additionally, the use of intraoperative endoscopy to evaluate the lumen of the conduit during surgery proved beneficial in this case, highlighting its potential value in identifying and addressing obstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To mitigate gastroparesis as well as other post-operative complications, we undertook a prospective multicenter study to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic whole stomach esophagectomy with preoperative pyloric balloon dilatation. Methods: A prospective descriptive study on 37 patients with laparoscopic and thoracoscopic whole stomach esophagectomy with preoperative pyloric balloon dilatation from January 2019 to March 2023. The perioperative indications, clinical data, intra-operative index, pathological postoperative specimens, postoperative complications, and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated. Results: In our study, all patients were male, with dysphagia as the predominant symptom (45.9%). Esophageal cancer incidence was similar between middle and lower thirds. Nodules were the primary finding on esophagoscopy (48.6%). Preoperative pyloric dilation averaged 31.2 min without complications. Surgical duration ranged from 225 to 400 min (mean 305). Gastric tube fluid volume averaged 148.9 ± 110.66 ml per day. Among 34 post-operative cases underwent gastric transit scans, most had non-dilated stomachs with efficient pyloric drug circulation. Three cases required prolonged ventilation, precluding pyloric circulation scans. Four patients developed chylous fistula, one requiring chest tube embolization. Recurrent laryngeal nerve damage occurred in 10.8% of cases. Conclusion: After evaluating esophageal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic whole-stomach esophagectomy with preoperative pyloric balloon dilatation, it was found that this procedure is safe, effective, and significantly reduces postoperative gastroparesis and related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The relationship between postoperative cumulative systemic inflammation and cancer survival needs to be investigated. We developed an approach to the prognostication of postoperative esophageal cancer by establishing low and high cut-off values for the C-reactive protein (CRP) area under the curve (AUC) at 7 and 14 days after esophagectomy. Methods: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients with biopsy-proven invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent esophagectomies were evaluated. Postoperative CRP levels were analyzed for the first 14 days after surgery. The AUC on days 7 and 14 were calculated and compared with clinicopathological features and survival. The cut-off values for CRP at 7 days (CRP 7 d) and 14 days (CRP 14 d) were 599 mg/L and 1153 mg/L, respectively. Results: The patients in the low CRP 7 d group had significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), not that in the low CRP 14d group. The OS rates in the high CRP groups at PODs 1, 3, 10, and 14 were significantly lower than those in the low CRP groups. Postoperative complications were more common in the high CRP groups on PODs 3, 10, and 14. Univariate analyses revealed that pTNM stage, depth of tumor invasion, tumor location, lymph node involvement, and CRP 7 d were significant prognostic factors for both OS and RFS. The Cox proportional hazards model identified pTNM, tumor location, and CRP 7d as independent prognostic factors for the RFS and OS. Conclusions: Early prediction of patients with postoperative complications, and adequate management will suppress the elevation of CRP 7 d and further suppress the CRP value in the late postoperative period, which may improve the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES Elderly-specific data for multimodal treatment of oesophageal cancer (EC) is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multimodal treatment in older EC patients and to compare the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS Patients diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma who received NCT/NCRT were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2004–2015). First, we compared baseline and post-treatment characteristics between younger (<70 years) and older patients (≥70 years). Logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors of postoperative mortality. Second, we evaluated the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative mortality and overall survival in the older cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weights and multivariable analyses were used to compensate for differences in baseline covariates. RESULTS We 1st compared outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy plus oesophagectomy in 14 778 eligible EC patients. The older group experienced higher rates of postoperative mortality at 30 days (5.8%) and 90 days (13.5%) compared to younger patients. Postoperative mortality was significantly related to the Charlson–Deyo score and treatment-related factors including neoadjuvant therapy type and minimally invasive technique. Second, among the 3141 older patients (with a median follow-up of 57.8 months and 2029 deaths), those receiving NCT obtained significantly lower postoperative mortality and improved overall survival compared with NCRT (inverse probability of treatment weights-adjusted P  = 0.05; hazard ratio 0.85; 95% Cl 0.72–0.99). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant therapy plus oesophagectomy carries increased short-term mortality risk in older EC patients. NCT in older EC patients showed lower postoperative mortality but no statistically significant differences in overall survival, with a point estimate favouring NCT compared to the NCRT group, making NCT a potential option for consideration in specific cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in the surgical management of early- stage esophageal cancer. However, few studies have examined lymphadenectomy outcomes in advanced stages, particularly in patients who initially underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This retrospective study investigates the effect of lymphadenectomy in patients diagnosed with AJCC 8th-edition clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received concurrent preoperative chemoradiation. Methods: Data from 1994 to 2023 were retrieved from our retrospective database. All patients underwent a uniform evaluation and treatment protocol, including preoperative concurrent chemoradiation therapy comprising cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, followed by esophagectomy. The analysis encompassed clinical T and N stages, tumor location, tumor grade, pathological T and N stages, pathological stage, and the extent of lymph node dissection. Overall survival, "Free-To-Recurrence", and disease-free survival were assessed via Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the Cox regression model for multivariate analysis. Results: The dataset was stratified into two groups according to extent of lymph node dissection, with one group having <15 dissected nodes and the other having ≥15 dissected nodes. The group with <15 nodes exhibited a shorter "Free-To-Recurrence", worse disease-free survival, and lower overall survival. In multiple-variate analysis (Cox regression model), the number of dissected lymph nodes emerged as a significant factor influencing overall survival and freedom from recurrence. Conclusions: The quantity of lymphadenectomy is a crucial determinant for patients with AJCC 8th-edition clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving preoperative concurrent chemoradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who underwent either hybrid or open esophagectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic, Russia, from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. Data on demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary measures were overall complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi square test and t test via StatTech software (version 2.8.8). The number of removed lymph nodes was higher in the hybrid group (24±9) than in the open group (15±7) (P<0.001). In addition, the hybrid esophagectomy group showed significant reductions in operational time and blood loss (P<0.001 and P=0.014, respectively). The need for blood transfusion was higher in the open esophagectomy group (P=0.043). The postoperative length of stay in the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (open=20±8 days, hybrid=17±7 days, P=0.178). Cardiac complications were more frequent after an open esophagectomy (P=0.044). Hybrid esophagectomy reduced postoperative cardiac complications and other adverse events while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. It had advantages over standard open esophagectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirements, suggesting its efficacy for esophageal cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short‐term perioperative morbidity, long‐term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease‐free survival. Results: The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease‐free survival between groups. Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease‐free survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after a major complication, is increasingly being used as a surrogate for assessing quality of care following major cancer resection. The aim of this paper is to determine the failure to rescue (FTR) rate after oesophagectomy and explore factors that may contribute to FTR within Australia. Methods: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2015 to 2023 at five Australian hospitals was conducted to identify patients who underwent an oesophagectomy. The primary outcome was FTR rate. Perioperative parameters were examined to evaluate predictive factors for FTR. Secondary outcomes include major complications, overall morbidity, mortality, length of stay and 30‐day readmissions. Results: A total of 155 patients were included with a median age of 65.2 years, 74.8% being male. The FTR rate was 6.3%. In total, 50.3% of patients (n = 78) developed at least one postoperative complication with the most common complication being pneumonia (20.6%) followed by prolonged intubation (12.9%) and organ space SSI/anastomotic leak (11.0%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine any factors that were predictive for FTR however none reached statistical significance. Conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate the FTR rates following oesophagectomy within Australia, with FTR rates and complication profile comparable to international benchmarks. Integration of multi‐institutional national databases such as ACS NSQIP into units is essential to monitor and compare patient outcomes following major cancer surgery, especially in low to moderate volume centres. Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after a major complication, is increasingly being used as a surrogate for assessing quality of care following major cancer resection. This study is the first to evaluate the FTR rates following oesophagectomy within Australia. FTR rates and complication profiles were comparable to international benchmarks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Robotic surgery was first introduced in the late 1980s. Over the last few decades, it gradually gained popularity across all fields of surgery. Thoracic surgery is one of the surgical subspecialities to embrace this innovative platform. The field is currently experiencing a paradigm shift from the video-assisted thoracoscopic platform to the robotic platform, which will likely become the mainstream approach to minimally invasive surgery. There is still a lack of large randomized control studies to directly compare the patient outcomes between the minimally invasive approaches. This review aims to summarize the current application of the robotic platform in commonly practiced thoracic operations, its impact on clinical outcomes, and the future directions for thoracic robotic surgery to assist surgeons when choosing the optimal surgical approach. With the paradigm shift in minimally invasive surgery from the video-assisted thoracoscopic platform to the robotic platform, thoracic surgeons are applying the new technology through various commonly practiced thoracic surgeries, striving to improve patient outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality. This review will discuss the updates in lung resections, lung transplantation, mediastinal surgeries with a focus on thymic resection, rib resection, tracheal resection, tracheobronchoplasty, diaphragm plication, esophagectomy, and paraesophageal hernia repair. The transition from open surgery to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to now robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery (RVATS) allows complex surgeries to be completed through smaller and smaller incisions with better visualization through high-definition images and finer mobilization, accomplishing what might be unresectable before, permitting shorter hospital stay, minimizing healing time, and encompassing broader surgical candidacy. Moreover, better patient outcomes are not only achieved through what the lead surgeon could carry out during surgeries but also through the training of the next generation via accessible live video feedback and recordings. Though larger volume randomized controlled studies are pending to compare the outcomes of VATS to RVATS surgeries, published studies show non-inferiority data from RVATS performances. With progressive enhancement, such as overcoming the lack of haptic feedback, and future incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI), the robotic platform will likely be a cost-effective route once surgeons overcome the initial learning curve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive cancer with a poor therapeutic response and a significant risk of recurrence after radical resection. It usually metastasizes to the lung, bones, or liver. Unusual spread can be found in other organs, but only nine cases of pancreatic metastases have been reported in the Medline database. In the present paper, a literature review of nine cases with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and pancreatic metastasis was carried out. In addition to these cases, we present our case, the tenth case in the literature. It involved a patient who underwent surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and developed metachronous pancreatic metastasis 67 months after esophagectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed a squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Conclusions: Pancreatic metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is extremely rare. Pancreatic metastasis may develop several years after the treatment of the primary lesion. The diagnosis of metastasis is difficult, requiring histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The minimally invasive approach has been applied to esophageal cancer surgery since the last decade of the 20th century to reduce the notoriously high levels of postoperative morbidity and respiratory complications. In the last twenty years, due to all the encouraging demonstrations of clinical feasibility, safety, and oncological effectiveness, minimally invasive esophagectomy has gradually incorporated multiple elements of technical heterogeneity, creating individualized approaches for indications for surgery and operative techniques. This article combines all the procedural details and interdisciplinary requirements from a high-volume experience in esophageal cancer care and aims to provide a comprehensive description of the total minimally invasive (laparo-thoracoscopic) procedure for the two-field Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Background/Objectives: Esophagectomy represents a major oncological operation due to the surgical involvement of both the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The minimally invasive technique has been developed to minimize the operative impact on patients undergoing esophageal resections, often presenting with nutritional deterioration and poor functional reserves. Methods: The present article provides an illustrative description of the total minimally invasive (laparo-thoracoscopic) Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer integrated with complementary components of perioperative clinical management. This standardized surgical technique of two-field esophagectomy (i.e., laparoscopy and thoracoscopy) was depicted based on the experience of a tertiary center for esophageal cancer care with more than 1500 cases operated on, and in accordance with the SUPER reporting guidelines. Results and conclusions: The accomplishment of the following descriptive and illustrative content allowed the development of remarks on the strengths and possible flaws of this specific procedure, providing a measurable opportunity to absorb technical details of the most widespread surgical resection for esophageal cancer worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transcervical mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer is indicated in select institutions because of the complex surgical technique required and the unfamiliar surgical view compared with the standard transthoracic esophagectomy approach. This study was performed to compare the feasibility and efficacy of bilateral transcervical mediastinoscopic-assisted transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy (BTC-MATLE) with thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) for esophageal cancer. Methods: This study involved 392 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative minimally invasive esophagectomy with R0 resection (excluding salvage, conversion, and two-stage operations and open thoracotomy) at the National Cancer Center Hospital from 2017 to 2022. The patients underwent either BTC-MATLE or TE (32 and 360 consecutive patients, respectively). Propensity score-matching analysis was used to balance the baseline differences by covariates of age, performance status, and clinical stage. Results: There were statistically significant differences in age, performance status, cT factor, cN factor, cStage, preoperative treatment, and surgical history for respiratory disease. After propensity score-matching, these significant differences (excluding a surgical history of respiratory disease) were no longer statistically significant, and 27 patients were assigned to each group. The total operation time and the postoperative intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter in the BTC-MATLE than TLE group. There were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications or the three major postoperative complications of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, and pneumonia, even for patients whose preoperative pulmonary function indices (vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s) were significantly lower in the BTC-MATLE than TLE group. The numbers of total and thoracic harvested lymph nodes were significantly higher in the TLE than BTC-MATLE group; however, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups. Conclusion: BTC-MATLE may provide the same feasibility and oncological outcomes as TLE even for patients with significantly lower pulmonary function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A high risk of complications still accompanies gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. In this narrative review, we summarize the technological progress and the problems of gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Several types of gastric conduits exist, including the whole stomach and the narrow gastric tube. The clinical outcomes are similar between the two types of conduits. Sufficient blood supply to the conduit is mandatory for a successful esophageal reconstruction. Recently, due to the availability of equipment and its convenience, indocyanine green angiography has been rapidly spreading. When the blood perfusion of the planning anastomotic site is insufficient, several techniques, such as the Kocher maneuver, pedunculated gastric tube with duodenal transection, and additional microvascular anastomosis, exist to decrease the risk of anastomotic failure. There are two different anastomotic sites, cervical and thoracic, and mainly two reconstructive routes, retrosternal and posterior mediastinal routes. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in outcomes between the anastomotic sites as well as the reconstructive routes. Anastomotic techniques include hand-sewn, circular, and linear stapling. Anastomoses using linear stapling is advantageous in decreasing anastomosis-related complications. Arteriosclerosis and poorly controlled diabetes are the risk factors for anastomotic leakage, while a narrow upper mediastinal space and a damaged stomach predict leakage. Although standardization among the institutional team members is essential to decrease anastomotic complications, surgeons should learn several technical options for predictable or unpredictable intraoperative situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: During esophagectomy for malignancy, the anterior and posterior branches of the vagus nerve are transected in order to achieve surgical radicality. This leads to loss of central nervous system-control of the pylorus which may lead to delayed gastric emptying. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of the EndoFLIP technique for assessment of pyloric biomechanical properties in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods: A feasibility study in six patients undergoing surgery was conducted. EndoFLIP measurements were carried out preoperative (Pre-op), after surgical resection (Post-op) and following prophylactic balloon dilatation of the pylorus (Post-dil). By measuring the cross-sectional area and pressure of the pylorus the pyloric compliance and the incremental pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated. Results: Placing the catheter in the pyloric region was successfully achieved in all six patients. No complications were observed. Resection of the esophagus increased the incremental pyloric elastic modulus (Ep) from 0.59 ± 0.18 kPa to 0.99 ± 0.34 kPa (p = 0.03). After dilatation, the Ep was reduced to 0.53 ± 0.23 kPa (p = 0.04), which was close to Pre-op (p = 0.62). The pyloric compliance showed a similar pattern as that found for Ep. Conclusion: The EndoFLIP system holds promise for assessment of biomechanics of the pyloric region in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: For patients with clinical complete response of non-metastatic esophageal cancer (EC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), the two treatment options obligate postneoadjuvant surgery as the current standard treatment (surgery on principle) versus active surveillance with surgery as needed only in recurring loco-regional tumor as a possible future alternative or standard exist. Since these treatments are presumably equivalent in terms of overall survival, patient-centered information can encourage the discussion with the treating physician and can make it easier for patients to make trade-offs between the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment alternatives in a highly distressed situation. Methods: A qualitative prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to create patient-centered information material that is based on patients’ preferences, needs, and concerns regarding the two treatment options, and to investigate the potential participation in a consecutive randomized controlled trial (RCT). Therefore, EC patients (N = 11) were asked about their attitudes. Results: Concerns about the surgery and possible postoperative impairments in quality of life were identified as most mentioned negative aspects of surgery on principle, and recurrence and progression fear and the concern that surgery cannot be avoided anyways as most named negative aspects of surgery as needed. In regard to the participation in an RCT, making a contribution to science and the hope that the novel therapy would be superior to the established one were relevant arguments to participate. On the other hand, the lack of a proactive selection of treatment was named an important barrier to participation in an RCT. Conclusion: The importance of adapting medical conversations to the patients’ lack of expertise and their exceptional cognitive and emotional situation is stressed. Results of this study can be used to improve patient-centered information and the recruitment of patients in RCTs in cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate prognostic differences between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in patients with surgery after a prolonged interval (> 12 wk) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Background: Previously, we established that a prolonged interval after CRT before esophagectomy was associated with poorer longterm survival. Methods: This was an international multicenter cohort study involving 17 tertiary centers, including patients who received CRT followed by surgery between 2010 and 2020. Patients undergoing MIE were defined as thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approaches. Results: A total of 428 patients (145 MIE and 283 OE) had surgery between 12 weeks and 2 years after CRT. Significant differences were observed in American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, radiation dose, clinical T stage, and histologic subtype. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, sex, body mass index, pathologic T or N stage, resection margin status, tumor location, surgical technique, or 90-day mortality. Survival analysis showed MIE was associated with improved survival in univariate (P= 0.014), multivariate analysis after adjustment for smoking, T and N stage, and histology (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.14-2.5) and propensity-matched analysis (P=0.02). Further subgroup analyses by radiation dose and interval after CRT showed survival advantage for MIE in 40 to 50 Gy dose groups (HR= 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-3.0) and in patients having surgery within 6 months of CRT (HR =1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.2). Conclusions: MIE was associated with improved overall survival compared with OE in patients with a prolonged interval from CRT to surgery. The mechanism for this observed improvement in survival remains unknown, with potential hypotheses including a reduction in complications and improved functional recovery after MIE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to explore the clinical value of 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in dissecting recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 205 patients, including 120 males, who underwent esophagectomy from May 2018 to May 2020 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Perioperative parameters, including intraoperative blood loss, operation time, the number of dissected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, the incidence and degree of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, the volume of postoperative thoracic drainage, and postoperative complications, were compared between the 3D and 2D groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative baseline data between these two groups (P > 0.05). The number of dissected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in the 3D group was significantly higher than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). The operation times were significantly shorter in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). The volume of thoracic drainage in the first 2 days was significantly less in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to the 2D system, the application of 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy can increase the number of dissected recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes and ensure safety. Additionally, it can reduce the duration of the operation, decrease early postoperative thoracic drainage volume, and promote patient recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a highly invasive gastrointestinal surgical procedure. The National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan, initiated in 2011, has compiled real-world data on esophagectomy, one of nine major gastroenterological surgeries. This review examines outcomes after esophagectomy analyzed using the Japanese big databases. Certification systems by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery (JSGS) and the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) have shown that institutional certification has a greater impact on short-term surgical outcomes than surgeon certification. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged as a viable alternative to open esophagectomy, although careful patient selection is crucial, especially for elderly patients with advanced tumors. The NCD has significantly contributed to the assessment and enhancement of surgical quality and short-term outcomes, while studies based on Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan (CRECJ) have provided data on patient characteristics, treatments, and long-term outcomes. The JES has conducted various questionnaire-based retrospective clinical reviews in collaboration with authorized institutions certified by JES. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database provides administrative claims data including itemized prices for surgical, pharmaceutical, laboratory, and other inpatient services. Analyzing these nationwide databases can offer precise insights into surgical quality for esophageal cancer, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting. Methods: We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL. Results: Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11–70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64–3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference). Conclusions: In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The association between recurrence timing and prognosis in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify this association using multicenter prospective clinical trial data. Methods: Among 162 patients enrolled in a NAC phase II study comparing the efficacy of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus adriamycin, 64 patients with recurrence after R0 resection were included in this study. We evaluated the association between recurrence timing and overall survival after recurrence (OSr), along with clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence timing and OSr. Results: Among 64 patients, 46 (71.9%) and 59 (92.2%) experienced recurrence within 1 and 2 years after surgery, respectively. Groups based on recurrence timing, including ≤ 6, 6–12, and > 12 months, had median OSr of 3.6, 13.9, and 13.4 months, respectively. The prognosis was significantly poorer for patients with recurrence ≤ 6 months after surgery than for other patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed pathological lymph node staging as an independent factor associated with early recurrence (odds ratio: 3.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–8.02, P = 0.0045). On the other hand, multivariate analysis for factors associated with OSr revealed pT (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91, 95%CI 1.26–2.88, P = 0.0022), early recurrence (HR: 6.88, 95%CI 2.68–17.6, P < 0.001), and treatment after recurrence, with both local treatment (HR: 0.47, 95%CI 0.22–0.98, P = 0.043) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.25, 95%CI 0.11–0.58, P = 0.0011) as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer experiencing recurrence within 6 months after esophagectomy following NAC have an extremely poor prognosis, suggesting that an advanced pN stage is associated with early recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study. Methods: Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I–IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used. Results: The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61–1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression–free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04–1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1–2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29–1.26) and cStage I–II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24–1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3–4 and cStage III–IVA. Conclusions: Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1–2 and cStage I–II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a very rare case of delayed necrosis of the reconstructed colon 6 months after esophagectomy. A 67-year-old male patient had undergone esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer in 2014. Subsequently, total gastrectomy and ileo-colon reconstruction via a retrosternal route was performed for gastric tube cancer in 2022. Six months later, he suffered acute chest pain and came to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced CT showed severe dilation of the reconstructed colon with poor enhancement of the wall opposite mesentery, without arterial obstruction. Endoscopy showed no ischemic changes in the esophago-ileum anastomosis; however, mucosal color change to black was observed in the reconstructed colon. We diagnosed ischemic colitis of the reconstructed colon and started conservative treatment; however, 18 days later, he developed a right pyothorax due to perforation of the reconstructed colon. We performed necrosed colectomy with right chest drainage and cervical esophageal fistula was made. Histopathological examination revealed mucosal detachment, thinning of the muscularis propria, and ghost-like appearance of crypt. If necrosis of the reconstructed colon is suspected in the late postoperative period, endoscopic findings of the colonic mucosa may be useful in determining surgical treatment, even in the absence of arterial blood flow obstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radical esophagectomy, including thoracic duct resection (TDR), has been proposed to improve regional lymphadenectomy and possibly reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence. However, because of its impact on immunoregulation, some authors have expressed concerns about its possible detrimental effect on long-term survival. The purpose of this review was to assess the influence of TDR on long-term survival. Patients and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched through 15 March 2024. Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary outcomes. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology was employed to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Results: The analysis included six studies with 5756 patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy. TDR was reported in 49.1%. Patients' ages ranged from 27 to 79 years and 86% were males. At 4-year follow-up, the multivariate meta-analysis showed similar results for the comparison noTDR versus TDR in term of OS [− 0.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 3.1, 1.3], CSS (0.1 months, 95% CI − 0.9, 1.2), and DFS (1.5 months, 95% CI − 2.6, 5.5). TDR was associated with a significantly higher number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.01–1.13) and higher risk of postoperative chylothorax (RR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.04–2.23). Anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications were comparable. Conclusions: TDR seems not to improve long-term OS, CSS, and DFS regardless of tumor stage. Routine TDR should not be routinely recommended during esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients achieving pathological complete response (pCR) post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have a favorable prognosis. However, recurrence occurs in approximately 20–30% of all patients, with few studies evaluating their prognostic factors. We identified these prognostic factors, including inflammation-based markers, in patients with ESCC showing pCR after nCRT and surgery. Patients and Methods: Patients with ESCC undergoing esophagectomy post-nCRT (January 2007–August 2017) were studied. Survival analysis evaluated 5-year overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Risk factors, including inflammation factors, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), were analyzed using Cox-proportional hazards model. Results: Overall, 123patients participated herein. After a median follow-up duration of 67 months (44–86 months), 17 patients (12.3%) had recurrent disease. The 5-year OS and RFS rates were 71.6% and 68.0%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, older age (≥ 60 years) [hazard ratio (HR) 3.228, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.478–7.048, p = 0.003], higher pretreatment T stage (≥ T3; HR 2.563, 95% CI 1.335–4.922, p = 0.005), nonapplication of induction chemotherapy (HR 2.389, 95% CI 1.184–4.824, p = 0.015), and higher post-nCRT PLR (≥ 184.2; HR 2.896, 95% CI 1.547–5.420, p = 0.001) were poor independent prognostic factors for 5-year RFS. The patient group with three to four identified factors with poor outcomes exhibited a 5-year RFS rate of 46.2%. Conclusions: Significant prognostic factors include higher post-nCRT PLR, older age, higher clinical T stage, and nonapplication of induction chemotherapy. Identifying higher recurrence risk patients is crucial for tailored follow-up and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this perspective article, we highlighted some special aspects of being a surgeon that are typically not taught in medical training. Departing from a real and personal story, the present manuscript is intended to communicate how surgery imbues us doctors with an unparalleled degree of satisfaction, gratification, meaning and fulfilment, like no other field of medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During esophagectomy, evaluation of blood supply to the gastric tube is critically important to estimate and avoid anastomotic complications. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography during esophagectomy and postoperative endoscopy findings, especially mucosal color change. Methods: This study retrospectively collected data from 86 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy and reconstruction using a gastric tube for esophageal cancer at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University between 2017 and 2020. The flow speed of ICG fluorescence in the gastric tube was evaluated during the operation. Additionally, the main root of ICG enhancement and pattern of ICG distribution in the gastric tube were evaluated. On postoperative day 1 (POD1), the change in the mucosal color to white, thought to reflect ischemia, or black, thought to reflect congestion of the proximal gastric tube, was evaluated. The correlations between these factors, clinical parameters, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses used logistic regression to identify the risk factors affecting mucosal color change. Results: Multivariate analyses revealed that the only independent significant predictor of mucosal congestion on POD1 was the ICG enhancement time of the right gastric tube tip (odds ratio, 14.49; 95% confidential interval, 2.41–87.24; P = 0.004). Conclusions: This study indicated that the ICG enhancement time is related to venous malperfusion and congestion rather than arterial malperfusion and ischemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]