Search

Copyright of Filozofski Vestnik is the property of Scientific Research Centre of Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filosofija, Sociologija is the property of Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

U ovom radu nudim interpretaciju Mercierove kritike modernog pristupa spoznajnom problemu. Interpretacija počiva uglavnom na razlikovanju između objekta i stvari i na razlikovanju između objektivnoga i transobjektivnoga. Ta dva razlikovanja prožimaju Mercierovu kritiku, premda ih on nigdje ne razrađuje. U ovom radu, razrađujem te dvije distinkcije, da bih im potom pustio da, tako razrađene, prožmu Mercierovu kritiku iznova, s konačnim rezultatom koji, u osnovi, pokazuje da Mercierova kritika počiva na načelima objektivizma i objektivnoga realizma, nasuprot transobjektivnome realizmu, i na motivu povratka svijeta umu koji ga je stvorio, nasuprot modernoj koncepciji stvarnosti odvojene od uma.

Copyright of Church in the World / Crkva u Svijetu is the property of University of Split, Catholic Faculty of Theology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filozofija i Drustvo is the property of University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy & Social Theory and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Etnolog is the property of Slovene Ethnographic Museum and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Analitički američki filozof religije Alvin Plantinga razvio je epistemološku teoriju jamstva (warrant theory) i epistemološki model Akvinski/Calvin. Ovdje želimo predstaviti njegovu teoriju, model i izabrane kritičke osvrte.

Copyright of Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law is the property of Revus - European Constitutionality Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filozofski Vestnik is the property of Scientific Research Centre of Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filozofija i Drustvo is the property of University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy & Social Theory and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

U ovom radu polazimo od konstatacije da današnje filozofske rasprave o slici čovjeka (antropologija) stoje pod snažnim utjecajem prirodoznanstvenog mišljenja. Posljednjih desetljeća u filozofiji duha prevladava fizikalizam koji se oslanja na uspjehe modernih prirodnih znanosti. Iz toga zatim proizlazi stav da je potrebno odbaciti neke bitne vidove slike čovjeka, poglavito one koji se tiču čovjekova odnosa prema transcendenciji, kao i njegove sposobnosti za etičko djelovanje. U današnjem kulturnom i znanstvenom kontekstu izgubio se svaki trag onome što smo stoljećima u kulturnoj povijesti, u povijesti religija, u filozofiji i teologiji nazivali imenom „duša“. Pojam „duša“ nije više predmet studijskog izučavanja, tek je još retorička ili pjesnička figura, riječ kojoj se pridaje puka simbolička vrijednost u popisu uhodanih pobožnih izraza religioznog jezika. U prvom dijelu rada, koji nosi naslov „Sudbina duše u doba znanosti“, pratit ćemo progresivno iščeznuće pojma ljudske duše u filozofiji, psihologiji i neuroznanostima. Moderne znanosti radije koriste pojmove kao što su: ja, svijest, subjektivnost, um, psiha, mozak, duh, a sasvim rijetko „duša“. U drugom i glavnom dijelu rada, pod naslovom „Ponovno misliti dušu u kulturi prožetoj znanstvenim duhom“ pokušat ćemo ukazati na potrebu ponovne aktualizacije pojma duše, s ciljem da se nadiđe scijentistička vizija stvarnosti i antropološki redukcionizam. Najprije ćemo razmotriti biblijsko značenje riječi „duša“, kao i njezinu funkciju u teološkom govoru. Nakon toga prikazat ćemo neke aktualne teološke pokušaje da se progovori o ljudskoj duši u obzorju današnjih znanstveno-filozofskih rasprava. Svrha ovog doprinosa sastoji se u jednom, koliko je to uopće moguće, sažetom prikazu aktualnosti zaboravljenog pojma ljudske duše, kao i pokušaju da se taj pojam učini razumljivim suvremenom čovjeku u kontekstu prirodoznanstvene slike svijeta. Pojam ljudske duše i danas može biti „prijenosnik“ cjelovite i smislene vizije kršćanske slike čovjeka.

Copyright of Filozofski Vestnik is the property of Scientific Research Centre of Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies / Sodobna Pedagogika is the property of Association of Slovenian Educationalists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Svaka ozbiljna rasprava o prozi Vjenceslava Novaka uzima činjenicu nemogućnosti njezina smještanja u unaprijed zadani diskurzivni okvir kao normu. Od Frangeša do Nemeca, književna će kritika i teorija u Novakovim djelima s pravom uočavati elemente koji istovremeno potvrđuju i potiru nazore epohe. Ovaj će se rad, na primjeru ambivalentnoga tretmana lika Lucije Stipančić u romanu Posljednji Stipančići, baviti analizom upravo tih elemenata. Nema sumnje kako se kroz Lucijin lik prelamaju proturječni individualni i društveni motivi. Ono što izaziva pozornost jest točka prijeloma: kritika postaje moguća tek u trenutku kada njezina realizacija više nije moguća. Koristeći epistemološke uvide Foucaulta, Bachelarda i nazore performativne feminističke kritike (Butler), ali i Novakove estetske preokupacije (Čemu se uči teorija glazbe), u radu će se pokušati odgovoriti na pitanje u kojoj je mjeri moguće govoriti o umjetnički svjesnom činu subvertiranja epohalnoga jezika, a u kojoj je mjeri riječ tek o simptomatičnim ideološkim i diskurzivnim impulsima inherentno nazočnima u svakom jezičnom iskazu.

Pričujoče besedilo govori o možnostih

Copyright of Church in the World / Crkva u Svijetu is the property of University of Split, Catholic Faculty of Theology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of the Institute of Croatian History / Radovi Zavoda za Hrvatsku Povijest is the property of Zavod za Hrvatsku Povijest, Filozofski Fakultet and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Obnovljeni zivot is the property of University of Zagreb, Society of Jesus and Faculty of Philosophy & Religious Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination & New Anthropology / Časopis za Kritko Znanosti, Domišljijo in Novo Antropologijo is the property of Institute for the Critique of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Socijalna Ekologija is the property of Croatian Sociological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filozofija i Drustvo is the property of University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy & Social Theory and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Filozofija i Drustvo is the property of University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy & Social Theory and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The text presents the phenomenological foundation of the epistemology of interculturality and indicates the importance of phenomenology for social epistemology. Waldenfels’ understanding of phenomenology as philosophy of experience and views of philosophy in the perspective of its impact on social reality is especially emphasized. In this sense, the epistemology of interculturality is presented as an expression of the active thought and the power of philosophy to establish the social meaning of reality, explain relations within networks of lifeworlds and show the real consequences of the spirit on social phenomena. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Filozofija i Drustvo is the property of University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy & Social Theory and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article, which is written in memory of Graham Barnes, describes his project of »reflexive« or »recursive psychotherapy«, which uses circular logic to turn psychotherapy back onto itself to bite its own tail to investigate its basic premises. With reflexive thinking we cannot step out of theory, but rather into another experience through a comparative epistemology. This entails developing a theory about theories, a language of language, an explanation of someone's experience that is also their experience. On the basis of my personal learning experience with Graham Barnes I describe his understanding of the tragedy in mental health and psychotherapy and his endeavours for the realization of psychotherapy which is not theory centered and which looks at psychopathology as invention rather than as a discovery. Three concepts - justice, love and wisdom - are then presented, which Barnes proposes as the key elements of psychotherapy as a talking activity and a way of persuasion, which can contribute to the development of civilization and democracy. Using the idea of »auditory hallucination« and with a vignette from clinical practice, it is shown how reflexive psychotherapy can reframe psychopathology to prevent pathologization, objectivizing connotations and stigmatizing the social impacts of psychiatric diagnostic categories. It is then shown how Barnes' dialogical and reflexive psychotherapy fits with postmodern constructivist ways of practice and how its principles can help psychotherapists to improve their efficacy and flexibility in their responses to the uniqueness of each client. The principles, which Barnes is proposing, have been confirmed by contemporary process - outcome research about what works in psychotherapy and by common factors theory on which the client-directed approach is based. The article concludes with showing how Barnes since his childhood was always creatively stepping beyond limitations and as a nonconformist stood up against unjust social restrictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Družboslovne Razprave is the property of Druzboslovne Razprave and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal for the Critique of Science, Imagination & New Anthropology / Časopis za Kritko Znanosti, Domišljijo in Novo Antropologijo is the property of Institute for the Critique of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Rad razmatra ključne rasprave u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima i kritički predstavlja i ocenjuje uvide teoretičara u njihovu sadržinu, sistematizujući ih u analitičkom okviru zasnovanom na Ventovom ontološkom zaokretu, inspirisanom Rozenauovom rekonceptualizacijom promene u svetskoj politici nakon završetka Hladnog rata. Svest o složenosti ovakvog zadatka je prisutna, no pomenuti okvir bi, ako ništa drugo, trebalo da ponudi čitaocu svojevrsnu mapu koja olakšava snalaženje u naizgled nepreglednom i zamršenom svetu teorije međunarodnih odnosa, njenih trajnih sporenja i novih istraživačkih tema. Autor je posebnu pažnju posvetio karakterizaciji discipline u stanju „teorijskog mira”, odnosno značenjima i implikacijama danas preovlađujućeg teorijskog pluralizma i eklekticizma u međunarodnim odnosima. Autor ostavlja zaključak otvorenim budući da nije moguće pouzdano predvideti na koji način će naučna zajednica odgovoriti na ove perspektive, bilo da se krene putem prodornijeg dijaloga u ranom dobu teorijskog pluralizma, ili da se više radi na „kritičkom rešavanju problema” koje svakodnevno ispostavlja turbulentna svetska politika.

In this paper, I will consider Wittgenstein’s understanding of the concepts of knowledge and certainty and the need to differentiate these concepts in order to obtain a clearer picture about the nature and structure of human cognition. In his text On Certainty (Über Gewißheit), Wittgenstein analyses Moore’s characterization of the I Know attitude and points out to contradictions arising from his understanding of the previously stated. In this example, Wittgenstein shows that the question of the reliability of knowledge is incomprehensible without the question of the connection between linguistic and epistemic games which should always be contextually observed and articulated. Only in this way is it possible to overcome epistemological scepticism and relativism and open the question about the objectivity of knowledge. In this paper, I want to analyse the above stated assumptions that made Wittgenstein’s project the basis for a different understanding of epistemological topics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article stems from discussions on subjugating journalism to the capitalist imperative of 'rationalisation' of the labour process through technological innovations. A continuation of these tendencies is the gradual introduction of algorithms with the aim to supplement, enhance or replace journalistic work with technology. The apotheosis of this process is automated journalism, although it primarily supplements the established news production. Accompanying controversies raise challenging questions about what and how we know via journalism and how that knowledge is substantiated. In automated journalism, the construction of 'objective' facts and its language game depend not only on the combination of technology and human activity, but also on the separation of technological 'objectivity' and human subjectivity. The process of datafication of the facticity draws from the algorithmic judgment concentrated in the principle of legitimation through an instant and authoritative performance. In this respect, the historical principles of 'objective' journalism are being transformed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology is the property of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology is the property of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology is the property of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology is the property of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Obnovljeni zivot is the property of University of Zagreb, Society of Jesus and Faculty of Philosophy & Religious Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of CEPS Journal is the property of University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This review article focuses on the debate which is once again resurfacing in western culture: is hearing voices (»auditory verbal hallucinations« (AVH) in psychiatric vocabulary) a symptom of mental disorder or valuable resource? What is the appropriate reaction to voice hearers and their social context: endeavours to silence the voices with medication or acceptance and their utilization for recovery? The author is contributing to this debate from the viewpoint of cybernetic or constructivist epistemology as it was defined by Gregory Bateson (1904-1980). After a short summary of the history of voice hearing the epistemological problems with the definition of AVH are presented. With neuroscientific discoveries and epidemiological data it is shown that we are all potential voice hearers. Then the neurophenomenological project is presented in a more detailed way, which could connect first- and third-person research of AVHs. Additionally this is explained with the presentation of possibilities for the coexistence of objectivist nomothetic, hermeneutic constructivist and transformative epistemology. The article concludes with a consideration of not only how this coexistence could be helpful for a better quality of response to voice hearers, but also in a broader sense for the development of science and correction of pathologies of epistemology which are threatening ourselves, our close relatives, society and indeed the whole ecology of our planet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Social Sciences Bulletin / Sociālo Zinātņu Vēstnesis is the property of Socialo Zinatnu Vestnesis and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)